Route Internet traffic against the default VPN on SAA route

Similar Questions

• SG300-52. Prefer to send traffic to the default gateway rather than static route? Network stops if I disable ICMP redirects.

  I have 4 switches, each act as their own with a 26 subnet mask. They have static routes for every other switch. The firewall has a static route to each switch. If I unplug the LAN of the Firewall interface, traffic stops the flow of the switches. If I block the side LAN firewall, ICMP redirects, traffic stalls outside.

  So if you are connected to this switch, say that you pull an ip address of 192.168.122.20. Your front door is the 192.168.122.62 switch. If you try to access a server 192.168.127.142, the SG300 sends your traffic to 192.168.127.254 to get an ICMP redirect, rather than simply to communicate directly with 192.168.127.50.

  My network 'basic' is 192.168.127.0/24 vlan1 and the firewall is 192.168.127.254

  This is the route of one of my switches table (which has 192.168.122.0/26 and ports run on vlan122)

   Maximum Parallel Paths: 1 (1 after reset) IP Forwarding: enabled Codes: > - best, C - connected, S - static S 0.0.0.0/0 [1/1] via 192.168.127.254, 73:48:13, vlan 1 C 192.168.122.0/26 is directly connected, vlan 122 S 192.168.123.0/26 [1/1] via 192.168.127.123, 73:48:13, vlan 1 S 192.168.124.0/26 [1/1] via 192.168.127.124, 73:48:13, vlan 1 S 192.168.125.0/26 [1/1] via 192.168.127.125, 73:48:14, vlan 1 C 192.168.127.0/24 is directly connected, vlan 1 

  In any case, what gives? Why the switch would first try to send the stream to the firewall?

  EDIT: Here is the server routing table:

   [email protected]/* */:~$ ip route show default via 192.168.127.254 dev eth0 192.168.122.0/26 via 192.168.127.122 dev eth0 192.168.123.0/26 via 192.168.127.123 dev eth0 192.168.124.0/26 via 192.168.127.124 dev eth0 192.168.125.0/26 via 192.168.127.125 dev eth0 192.168.127.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.127.142 

  Hi Jonathan,.

  I'm sorry. I misunderstood the routing table you want to accomplish. Your concern seems relevant given that the matching rule more will be selected instead of one: page 275 http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/csbms/sf30x_sg30x/...

  ... "When the routing of traffic, the next hop is decided based on the longest match on the prefix (LPM algorithm). A destination IPv4 address might match several routes in the IPv4 static routing Table. The device uses the matching route with the higher, subnet mask that is, the longest match on the prefix. "...

  So go ahead and report it to the support team so the guys can make the laboratory, confirm it and declare additional:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/Web/TSD-Cisco-small-business-suppor...

  Kind regards

  Aleksandra

• Internet access from the default remote gateway? NO SPLIT TUNNELING

  I am facing a problem for a long time, I have an ASA5505 I went through a lot of config and research until I got the inside interface to be able to go to the internet; However my VPN clients are unable to go to the Internet. Now, here's the network config:

  -J' have a router (which is a modem and a router and an AP) 3 in 1... This router is connected to the ISP with a coaxial cable. the Interior is 192.168.0.0/24 network.

  -L'ASA is connected to rotate inside the network of its ' outside the interface.

  -L' SAA within the 192.168.1.0/24 network is a configured static gateway already (which is the router) outside the int > default gateway 192.168.0.1 (which is the internal IP address of the router).

  -Inside the ASA computers are able to connect to Web sites (but I can't do anything outside the network of CMD PING)!

  -When a VPN cleint to connect using IPsec (without certificate) by using a Cisco VPN client software, the client can ping and do the remote desktop connection with computers on the same within the network (192.168.1.0/24) but can not pass the Internet even know that other computers on the network can go to the internet.

  -One of the computers on the network (the inside network) is a DC server 2008 R2 which can go to the internet, as I mentioned above.

  What I'm trying to do is have the VPN clients to be able to go to the internet with the help of which the ASA inside the NETWORK card as a default gateway (192.168.1.1), I already have the VPN configuration with the name of the group, preshared key, user name and password and without the split tunneling (which is what I want)

  Thank you

  Hello

  The most common problem by getting ICMP to work through the ASA failed ACL or the ICMP Inspection rules.

  Check your configurations of current ' policy-map ' on the SAA with the command

  See the race policy-map

  I assume you have the default configurations 'policy-map' on the SAA, that are attached to the global

  Under ' policy-map ' configurations, you should see several 'inspect' commands. Pass under the correct configuration mode (where the current commands are found) and add the following

  inspect the icmp

  inspect the icmp error

  Then retest the ICMP through firewall.

  In regards to the VPN Internet traffic, we would need to know the level of Software ASA which you can check with the command 'show version'

  You must first verify that you have this command

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  This will allow the traffic to the VPN users access the interface ' outside ' of the ASA, get PATed and then leave again through the ' outside ' interface. Without the command above it will not work. Will never go the VPN Internet user traffic through the interface "inside" of your ASA.

  Then, you will also need the dynamic configuration PAT for your VPN users, so they are translated at the same IP address that users of LAN behind the ASA. This format of configuration depends on the software level, that I mentioned above

  On a SAA running 8.2 (or below) you would usually have this configuration

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 (or the mentioned specifically LAN)

  To activate the dynamic PAT for VPN users that you would add

  NAT (outside) 1

  On one ASA 8.3 running (and above) you can configure the dynamic PAT for users of VPN in the following way

  network of the VPN-PAT object

  subnet

  dynamic NAT interface (outdoors, outdoor)

  It should be. Of course, you could have a configuration that may replace it, but I doubt it.

  Hope this helps

  -Jouni

• RV 320 won't internet traffic through the SMC modems

  We have recently installed a RV320 to use primarily as a gateway for FTP traffic. The router is installed power 2 60/10 circuits of our Internet service provider who provided 2 edge of the MSC devices and which have Wifi capabilities and router. When connect on modems in factory default state the RV320 connects but does not take advantage of the double connections in terms of speed. When disable us the wifi modems and router running the RV 320 connects but do not traffic through to the modems.

  Since the two modems are identical, we get the same news IP and gateway of each. I would prefer not to have the modem in router mode. Is there a setting on the RV that will connect and pass internet traffic with modems in mode 'dumbed down '.

  Graham Saywell

  Wanted to sound and image

  Toronto

  Hi Graham,

  The best scenario is to have both SMC routers on bridge mode and configure both on RV320 WAN interface with (PPPE, static IP, DHCP... He expense of your WAN connection)

  Can you please share with us what kind of WAN connection you use in the SMC routers?

  -Ensure the RV320 you have the latest firmware 1.1.0.09, otherwise you can download it from this link:

  http://software.Cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=284005929&softwareid=282465789&release=1.1.0.09&relind=available&rellifecycle=&RelType=latest

  -On RV320 under the management of the system--> Dual WAN and check Load Balance

  -After that, you set up the RV320 with the same type of WAN connection as a router SMC and SMC router mode Bridge and in this case, you should see the two public IP on RV320 of audit system summary

  If you do these steps and still you can not the public IP address RV320 and the SMC router in Bridge mode, please share with us the configuration file RV320 and screenshots of two CMS about the WAN configuration

  If in the case the SMC router does not have the option of working in Bridge mode, in this case, you will need to have the local of the SCM with subnet different e.g. 192.168.1.1/24 and other a 192.168.2.1/24

  on RV320 you can leave the configuration in DHCP on both WAN Ondaaah (if you have the DHCP Server enable SMC router) or you can configure the static IP address on the two wan

  * Please answer question mark or note the fact other users can benefit from the TI *.

  Thank you

  Mehdi

• Information on the routing of traffic of the client VPN to PIX.

  Hey all,.

  I could follow the VPN Wizard included in the PDM and able to connect with the VPN Clients for the PIX. But I'm looking for more information about how the routing is done.

  For example, my remote is 67.71.252.xxx and my inside is 192.168.1.xxx. But if I connect via VPN to PIX Client, all data is transferred through my VPN to PIX and then trying to get out to the Internet.

  I'll settle for data goes 192.168.1.xxx for transit through the VPN. This configuration made via the PIX or is it the responsibility of the Client machine to set up rules of the road?

  All links to the guides to installation, or technical notes would be great.

  Thank you inadvance.

  Paul

  Hello

  I think the key word you are looking for is "split tunneling". This can be validated on the PIX using the vpngroup split access_list tunnel GroupName command.

  "Split tunneling allows a remote VPN client or encrypted simultaneous Easy VPN remote access device to the corporate network and Internet access. Using the vpngroup split-tunnel command, specify the access list name with which to associate the split tunneling of traffic. "

  In this example configuration: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/pix3000.html, note that the same access list is used to "nat 0" and split-mining:

  access-list 101 permit ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.2.0 255.255.255.0

  (Inside) NAT 0-list of access 101

  vpngroup vpn3000 split tunnel 101

  Order reference:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps2120/products_command_reference_chapter09186a00801727ae.html#wp1099471

  Please let us know if this helped

  Kind regards

  Mustafa

• Writing javascript code to a box that when activated, it removes the read-only attribute in another area and allows a number against the default calculation that occur.

  I have an order entry form that calculates a sum of $ calculate markup by a formula in the section rating field simplified in the field on the tab properties.  The field of markup is set to read-only.  I also have a configuration like a checkbox.  If the user selects the check box, I need this field of markup to become editable (remove the read-only attribute) to allow a number to be entered in the field.  I guess I'd also need programmatically delete the calculation in the simplified field notation when the box has been activated.  I think I need a custom java script to trigger on mouse enter?  I could also use some help setting java script.  Someone has it all done something similar?

  Thanks in advance.

  You can no longer use the method of the "simple field notation" If you change the field in certain situations. The following script assumes that you just want to add two fields and use 25% of this amount as your markup, unless the box named "CheckBox" is checked, then the field will become editable and you can enter what you want:

  // get the state of the "CheckBox" - modify the field name to match your form
  var cb = this.getField("CheckBox");
  
  if (cb.value == "Off") {
      // Checkbox is unchecked, so perform the calculation and make sure the field is read-only
      event.target.readonly = true;
       // simple calculation - you need to modify this
      var result = (Number(this.getField("Field1").value) + Number(this.getField("Field2").value)) * 0.25;
      event.value = result;
  }
  else {
      // Checkbox is checked, so do not modify the value, set the field to read/write and let the user enter anything they want.
      event.target.readonly = false;
  }
  

• Internet through a RA IPSec VPN Tunnel traffic

  Armed with an ASA 5505 Security Plus, I configure IPSec VPN for RA the VPN IP address pool is in the 192.168.2.0/28 network.

  The Lan is 192.168.1.0/24 with inside interface a.254.

  The VPN works great. What I would do is to route all internet through the firewall traffic when users are connected to the VPN. I put this gateway 192.168.1.254 tunnel, but I'm having no luck to get it works.

  Any ideas?

  Thanks in advance!

  You are just going to route internet traffic to the remote vpn client to the ASA and backward on the Internet?

  If the above statement is correct, you need not configure the tunnel default gateway.

  But you need to configure NAT for the ip pool, so they can go to the internet, as well as the 'same-security-movement' command as follows:

  NAT (outside) 1 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  In addition, assuming that you have not have split configured tunnel.

• High utilization of the processor in Mode VSS when traffic through the internet.

  Hi all

  I have a problem with the installation of VSS. The VSS service install act as a central office switch of transit for internet traffic and the problem arises when there are about 600 Mbps of traffic through the switch. We notice that there are a lot of packages being softswitch and the rate is quite high, almost like 100 to 200 k per second.

  The VSS switch manages ospf and BGP and have plenty of internet routing. After investigation of high CPU usage, I noticed that the AAGR switch is full and has tried to set the course of max mls to the maximum cef and restarted the VSS service.

  Unfortunately, the problem persists after restarting.

  We had planned to filter the full internet routes and enable by default and ospf route only in the VSS service and restart the VSS service to make sure that the table AAGR is not overloaded.

  If I fail the next step is to return to autonomous mode and hope that the processor will not pull up.

  My Question: These step will prevent the issue? Suggestions or the reference similar to the problem I am facing in?

  Hello Sophie,.

  unless you have a PFC 3CXL and all the DFCs the AAGR 3CXL can manage only 256 000 IP prefixes and nowdays that complete a table is in order or 310-320 000 routes.

  See

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps9336/product_data_sheet0900aecd806ed759_ps708_Products_Data_Sheet.html

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/product_data_sheet09186a0080159856.html

  See table 1 in the second link it tells what I wrote in the first line.

  > We planned to filter the full internet routes and enable by default and ospf route only in the VSS service and restart the VSS service to make sure that the table AAGR is not overloaded.

  You should not need the device after accepting only the default route in OSPF or BGP AAGR use will be greatly reduced this is just wait a few minutes (unless there is an underlying SW bug) for the MSFC to update CFP and then all DFCs

  Hope to help

  Giuseppe

• Send all traffic through the vpn tunnel

  Does anyone know how to send all traffic through the tunnel vpn on both sides?  I have a server EZVpn on one side and one EZVpn client on the other.  I'm not natting on each side.  I use the value default 'tunnelall' for the attributes of group policy.  On the client side all traffic, even if not intended for the subnet of the side server, seems to pass through the tunnel.  But if I ping the side server, the same rules don't seem to apply.  Traffic destined for rates aside customer through the tunnel, but the traffic that is not pumped on the external interface in the clear.  That's not cool.

  Hello

  Clinet traffic to server through tunnel, that's right, right?

  Traffic from server to client through tunnel, but the rest of the traffic is not, no?

  This works as expected because in ezvpn, politics of "tunnel all ' is for traffic is coming from the client., do not leave the server.

  Side server, customer traffic will pass through tunnel, the rest used.

  Sian

• Use the class with the same name as the default Package class

  I am upgrading a project to Flash CC and to do in the old class JSON in com.adobe.serialization.json. When I compile, I get an error "1061: call to a possibly undefined method to decode a static type reference Class ' because he's probably trying to use the default package latest JSON class rather than com.adobe. I have the import statement in my class, 'import com.adobe.serialization.json.JSON', but I guess its audit against the default package and gives me a compilation error when I call "var parts: Object = JSON.decode (jsonData);

  Change the name of your custom class or change your settings (to use fp before 11) publication.

• Site to site VPN, I need all internet traffic to exit the site.

  I have 2 sites connected via a pair of SRX5308

  A = 192.168.1.0/24

  IP WAN = 1.1.1.1

  B = 192.168.2.0/24

  IP WAN = 2.2.2.2

  Now what I need to do, is to have all traffic from B to go to the site one even traffic destined to the internet. That is, I need internet traffic out of our network with the IP 1.1.1.1, even if it is from the network B.

  On my I have set up a route 1.1.1.1 of the ISP, then a value by default 0/0 to 192.168.1.1 it ASA knows how to get to the peer VPN is a more specific route, but sends everything above the tunnel, at the remote end which then hairpin of ASA routes internet outside its own WAN port traffic.

  I can understand though not how to so the same thing on the pair of SRX5308 they either don't raise the tunnel or internet route to the local site address B.

  Anyone have any ideas?

  I need to do this because we are logging and monitoring of internet traffic to A site via tapping from upstream to various IDS solutions and will not (cannot) reproduce this to all our remote sites.

  Thank you

  Dave.

  After some more thought and testing I came up with a workable solution to my own problem. I'll share it here in case it can help others.

  (1) use the wizard at both ends to implement a normal VPN that connects the two segments of network 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0

  (2) go to site VPN - VPN policy remote router192.168.2.1 and click Edit

  (a) disable Netbios

  (b) select "None" from the drop-down list the remote IP address.

  (c) to apply the change

  3) go to the VPN-> VPN policy on the head end site (192.168.1.1) and click Edit

  (a) disable Netbios

  (b) select "None" from the drop-down list the local IP address

  (c) to apply the change

  Now all the traffic wil go down the VPN tunnel and exit to the internet on the site of head end. Hope this helps others with the same question.

• Default route inside the tunnel VPN Site to site

  We want to carry the default traffic within the site to site VPN tunnel, our goal is to route all traffic including default branch road and HO HO help branch for surfing the internet.

  I have due to difficulties

  1. cannot configure dynamic NAT for the router in the branch on the ASA HO, I know configuration for 8.2, but know not about 8.4

  This is the configuration for the 8.2, if someone can translate to 8.4, which would be a great help

  NAT (outside) 1 192.168.230.0

  2. I do not know how to write the default route on the branch office router to send all traffic within the VPN tunnel

  Hello

  As I understand it then you want to route ALL traffic from the Remote Site to the Central Site and manage Internet traffic there.

  I suppose you could define "interesting traffic" in configuring VPN L2L ACL / access-list in the following way

  Branch router

  extended IP access list

  allow an ip

  ASA central

  ip access list allow one

  The idea behind the type of ACL for the VPN L2L above configurations is that, for example, the branch office router has a rule that sets connection coming from the local LAN for 'any' destination address must be sent to the VPN L2L connection. So, it would be in such a way that all the traffic will be sent to the Central Site via VPN L2L.

  I must say however, that the VPN router configurations side are not more familiar to me because I manage especially with ASA Firewall (and to some extent still PIX and FWSMs)

  I guess that on the ASA Central you will PAT translation to "outside" so that the host can access the Internet?

  You would probably do something like this

  object-group network to REMOTE-SITE-PAT-SOURCE

  network-object

  interface of REMOTE-SITE-PAT-SOURCE dynamic NAT (outside, outside) after auto source

  If you don't want to use the 'outside' IP address, then you will have to create a 'network of object' for address IP of PAT and use it in the line of NAT configuration above instead of "interface".

  Alternate configuration might be

  network of the REMOTE-SITE-PAT object

  subnet

  dynamic NAT interface (outdoors, outdoor)

  You also need to enable

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  To allow traffic to enter and exit the same interface on the ASA

  All these answers are naturally suggestion on what you have to do. I don't know what kind of configurations you have right now.

  Hope this helps in some way

  -Jouni

  Post edited by: Jouni Forss

• RV180 VPN route all internet traffic via IPSec VPN

  Hello

  I install my RV180 to VPN to our headquarters Fortigate 60 C. It works really well

  My only problem is that I don't know how to move internet traffic on our remote site by Headquarters. We want to use this technique so that all sites have the same web content filtering provided by our main Fortigate unit. I see clearly that all traffic destined to our internal network will go trough the VPN tunnel, but internet traffic will go through our modem at the remote site.

  My way of fortigate thinking said that I need a static route to transfer all traffic through the VPN tunnel. I've read elsewhere that I need to set up some sort of ACL.

  Anyone else has any ideas on this / has anyone successfully implemented somehting similar?

  Hi Jared,

  I don't think that RV180 takes complete care of tunneling. Complete tunneling allows you to all your traffic to VPN. RV180 made only split tunneling.

  Thank you

  Vijay

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• Tunnel of RV042 V3 that routes all traffic to the VPN

  Hi all

  I use Cisco Linksys RV-042 with V2 hardware to set up a VPN tunnel that route all traffic to the remote gateway (a Cisco ASA 5510). This configuration works very well, and I can access the local router and other resources to the central site.

  I'm doing the same thing with Cisco RV042 with version V3 of the material, but I can't access the local router until the VPN breaks down. I can ' ping, SNMP the local router, or access but I can access the central site. Very strange.

  Do you know what can I do to access the router local (for example, hardware V2) with connected VPN?

  Thank you

  Rafael

  Just a hunch, but in the remote network you agree with what the network and subnet?

  I've seen this symptom before.

  LAN on the RV series.

  10.10.2.0 255.255.255.0

  Trust remote networks

  10.10.1.0 255.255.248.0

  It is traffic destined to the router on the 10.10.2.1 ip address is through the tunnel forward. So, for this purpose, you can only access the router LAN interface when the tunnel is out of service. I'm not sure why ping works but it does. I'm looking into this symptom on a different device, but the device has a similar graphical interface.

  I would like to know if you have a similar setup.

  Cisco Small Business Support Center

  Randy Manthey

  CCNA, CCNA - security

• Send all VPN traffic and the other end it blocks Internet

  Hello

  I wonder if I can get a RV042 VPN Tunnel to a RV082 and in the RV082 block all traffic on the internet that comes form the computers that are behind the RV042.

  Something like this:

  Remote PC-> RV042-> VPN-> RV082-> firewall RV082 (block internet traffic, allow intranet traffic)

  Thank you very much

  Oliver

  The scenario you describe should be doable with a pair of RV042 and RV082, where all traffic is transmitted by RV042 to RV082. What you need is to configure an access on RV082 rule to deny the RV042 subnet HTTP traffic to ALL (internet).