route-map command

Hello

I try to configure the router to router ipsec tunnel, but I don't understant what of the command:

"road-map sheep permit 10.

Can someone explain it to me clearly?

Regars

It is there so that if you perform tunneling split that IE don't no nat on to the list of internet access that you set. You must follow this command with a "match ip address".

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

How to set up in the community of the 4-byte ASN route map?

Hi all

I want to do AS-prefix for one of my ISPs. I have map route this ISP and when I try to configure 'set the 64704:xxxxxx community' under the route map configuration mode, I get an error (it's 6 figures in my number of ACEs).

in the configuration guides always mentioned ASN "well known." I found 'set extcommunity rt' but I think, and it seems that is not what I want to achieve.

so, how can I include 4-byte ASN in my 'community set?

Thank you

Hi Ruslan,

Just to comment on the 4B ASN support - there are a few pitfalls. A the community attribute is a value of 4 b itself. So if you store your own ASN 4B in a community standard, there is no space left in it for the remaining part of the value of the community. As the set community command manipulates only standard communities, it is impossible to use 4B ASN with her. Extended communities could be the solution, because they are long 8B; However, the type of extended community to use is called AS specific BGP extended community and is defined in RFC 5668. Unfortunately, IOS does not seem to take this type of community - and even if it did, your ISP would not seek for it according to the output of BLACKBERRIES from the database. The particular kind of wider community, you tried to use is called road target, and it serves a different purpose.

That being said, I must say that I clearly don't understand the use of communities as indicated by your neighbor. Note that there are two communities:
```
remarks:         64700:ASN - do not announce to AS ASNremarks:         64709:ASN - announce to AS ASN
```
They say - do not advertise or advertise, to the ASN such AS specified in the lower part of the community. But how could your ISP perform filtering for an independent arbitrary system there if it isn't directly peering with it? It seems to me that if the ASN here in this description may be made by a defined limited ASN ot want to peer with your ISP and not an ASN preceded. In addition, when you read carefully:
```
remarks:         64701:ASN - prepend 1x to AS ASNremarks:         64702:ASN - prepend 2x to AS ASNremarks:         64704:ASN - prepend 4x to AS ASNremarks:         64706:ASN - prepend 6x to AS ASN
```
It is said "prefix N times to AS ASN" - but to precede what? And what it means when they say "precede"? I would say that at this point, it would be better to call your ISP and to clarify the precise meaning and operation of these values of the community until we try to find a solution to your needs. It might be possible that these communities leads to a different prepending operation than what we think. Best regards, Peter

Based on the IOS VPN Lan-to-Lan (NAT and route map Questions)

Hello world

I worked on my review of CCNA security and I have a question about this stage

LAN1 192.168.0.0/24---(routeur HQ)--10.10.10.0/30--(INTERNET)--20.20.20.0/30--(routeur Branch) - LAN2 192.168.1.0/24

I use 10.10.10.0/30 and 20.20.20.0/30 networks assuming that these are public addresses (is just a laboratory).

I read that if I want to make the VPN tunnel while I using NAT I must exclude valuable traffic from the NAT process so I look on the database of cisco for more help and I found this (look at the 3660 router configuration):

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008045a2d2.shtml#T1

so, I applied this config for my routers, so the config is:

IP nat inside source map route sheep interface fastEthernet0/1

access list 110 deny ip 192.168.0.0. 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

access list 119 permit ip 192.168.0.0. 0.0.0.255 any

sheep allowed 10 route map

corresponds to the IP 110

I didn't really understand who is using the command route-map here, so I made this configuration:

IP nat inside list sheep interface FastEthernet0/1

sheep extended IP access list

deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

Licensing ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 any

Two of them worked I could translate my LAN addresses to the public to address internet and also could establish the VPN tunnel. So my questions are:

1. What is the purpose of the road-map command?

2. What is the difference between these two configuration?

3. which one I should use and in what cases?

Thanks in advance

Jose

Jose,

Very good questions and in fact no need to the road map it.

Personally, I like using course maps because it allows much more flexibility than simply ACL setup, but in order to bypass the NAT source IPs, there is no need of route-maps and you can do this with the ACL directly.

I personally always use road-maps just because I can (route-maps are cool) haha

Route-maps are very useful in other scenarios where you need to put more of conditions or factors.

Remember that it is almost always more than one method to accomplish a task... which is one of those cases.

It will be useful.

Federico.

When you try to add a network route with the "route add" command in the command line, I get the message "the requested operation requires a rise."

Elevation required to route add command

When you try to add a network route with the "route add" command in the command line, I get the message "the requested operation requires a rise." What is the correct syntax to use?

You can watch using the PowerShell...

http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb978526.aspx

http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/scriptcenter/dd742419.aspx

.. .and post questions about Windows PowerShell forum...

http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/winserverpowershell/threads

Route map!

Hi all

I installed the VPN and VPN connections are OK. Internet access (with NAT overload) is also OK.

The ping between HUB = SPOKE1 and SPOKE2 = HUB is good.

But the ping between SPOK1 and SPOKE2 is bad.

I see that the map(ACL 105) road is deny certain packets, when I check the hit counters list (ACL 105).

Can help some body on it, y at - it all the parameters that miss me.

Why the route-map(ACL 105) private packages? The HUB ping = SPOK1 and SPOKE2 = HUB is 100% but in route map see the increase to deny the meter (105 ACL).

Here are the details of config:

ISR2821 #show run

version 12.3

no service button

tcp KeepAlive-component snap-in service

a tcp-KeepAlive-quick service

horodateurs service debug datetime localtime show-timezone msec

Log service timestamps datetime localtime show-timezone msec

encryption password service

sequence numbers service

hostname ISR2821

boot-start-marker

boot-end-marker

Security of authentication failure rate 3 log

Passwords security min-length 6

no set record in buffered memory

recording console critical

enable secret 5%

enable password 7%

username & password $7

No aaa new-model

IP subnet zero

no ip source route

synwait-time of tcp IP 10

IP cef

no ip bootp Server

property intellectual ssh time 60

property intellectual ssh authentication-2 retries

inspect the IP name def cuseeme

inspect the name def ftp IP

inspect the name def h323 IP

inspect the IP name def netshow

inspect the IP rcmd def name

inspect the name def realaudio IP

inspect the name def rtsp IP

inspect the name def smtp IP

inspect the name def sqlnet IP

inspect the name def streamworks IP

inspect the name def tftp IP

inspect the name def tcp IP

inspect the name def udp IP

inspect the name def vdolive IP

inspect the name def icmp IP

Max-in. IP 100 ips events

No ftp server enable write

crypto ISAKMP policy 1

BA 3des

preshared authentication

Group 2

crypto ISAKMP policy 2

preshared authentication

life 3600

key # address A.B.C.39 255.255.255.0 crypto ISAKMP xauth No.

key # address A.B.C.38 255.255.255.0 crypto ISAKMP xauth No.

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-sha-hmac ISRTest

map SDM_CMAP_1 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto

Description Tunnel toA.B.C.38

defined by peer A.B.C.38

game of transformation-ISRTest

match address 103

map SDM_CMAP_1 2 ipsec-isakmp crypto

Description Tunnel toA.B.C.39

defined by peer A.B.C.39

game of transformation-ISRTest

match address 104

Null0 interface

no ip unreachable

interface GigabitEthernet0/0

IP 172.29.160.1 255.255.255.0

IP access-group 100 to

no ip redirection

no ip unreachable

no ip proxy-arp

IP nat inside

IP virtual-reassembly

route IP cache flow

automatic duplex

automatic speed

No mop enabled

interface GigabitEthernet0/1

address IP A.B.C.40 255.255.255.0

IP access-group 101 in

Check IP unicast reverse path

no ip redirection

no ip unreachable

no ip proxy-arp

NAT outside IP

inspect the def on IP

IP virtual-reassembly

route IP cache flow

automatic duplex

automatic speed

No mop enabled

map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto

Have you tried an upgrade in the code for 12.3.14T and see if that helps?

I try to add a route using the route add command, the command response is "the requested operation requires a rise."

I'm traying to add a route using the route add command, the command response is "the requested operation requires a rise."

Command: route add 10.1.1.0 mask 192.168.31.3 192.168.31.33

Whay can I do, because I had tried in many cases

original title: route command

In response to a previous and similar thread...

You can watch using the PowerShell...

http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb978526.aspx

http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/scriptcenter/dd742419.aspx

.. .and post this question on the forum of Windows PowerShell...

http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/winserverpowershell/threads

Understand the NAT translation with route map

Hello

I try to configure the server EZVPN on SAA and EZVPN client on router 881. I found on the documentation to the NAT translation on the client side

My confusion is that I should use the deny on the access list statement? If anyone can explain this, enjoy it.

IP nat inside source overload map route EzVPN1 interface FastEthernet4

access-list 103 deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 103 allow ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 any

allowed EzVPN1 1 route map
corresponds to the IP 103

Hello

So that's the explanation for the statement "denied" on the ACL for NATing.

Based on the config, 192.168.3.x here is the network behind your 881 and 192.168.2.x is the network behind the ASA. Let's suppose you're trying to install between 192.168.2.10 and 192.168.3.10. When this package is delivered to the 881, it checks first the characteristics of penetration on the incoming interface (such as the ACL, political, policy-services, etc.) and before checking the 'IPSEC security associations", it checks the NAT configuration.

Now, your IPSec security association will specify for 192.168.2.x 192.168.3.x traffic to be encrypted and then sent. If we do not have the declaration of 'decline' in the ACL, the 881 will be NAT incoming packets and then the IP source in the package will get changed the IP address of the interface of SA4.

This match is no longer the configuration of IPSEC SA and therefore not get encrypted. Therefore, we must have the statements 'decline' to ensure that VPN traffic is not coordinated and is therefore correctly.

Hope this helps!

Newbie question route-map/access-list

I am quite new to the thing whole cisco here. I'm very hesitant to make changes as I am not sure that I take down the entire network of 200%. (We are a very small company)

We have a router cisco 1811 (yes I know its old)

We now have a road map and I'm trying to understand it to make it work the way we want. Basically, we have a few servers and we do not want some servers to use our cable internet connection, we want to use our T1. Our T1 uses an ASA5505 as a router. I don't know why, I know its not the best practice but I was just hired and that's all I have to say on this subject. I am doing as a result. Web traffic currently out our interface cable, everything, including the speed of transfer on speedtest.net out our T1. This makes the bad, bad VoIP phone calls. We also have a tunnel punch in Q1 of our other offices as well as our server Exchange2010 using T1. If our cable goes down, everything for the T1 (by design). We have a long list of defined access our route map - use corresponding ip. I want to change the access list to not allow local network IP addresses. I know that if I put in a whole ip allow it break our network and nothing comes out of the T1 line, and no one can get to our mail server more. So, I was thinking of adding some statements, but I was wondering if someone could help me with logic, so I know not if I will break the network. I wouldn't pull the laminated cord and use the console. (I really need get a USB serial interface). Now, you understand a little more about my situation now for all numbers, etc.

Network internal 90.0.0.0/24, 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.30.0/24, 172.20.0.0/16 (we use only 40 addresses, why they chose 16 is beyond me, stupid really)

PTP VPN: 192.168.116.0/24 comes and goes out our T1.

1811 router: 90.0.0.254/192.168.30.254/192.168.0.254

ASA: 90.0.0.50

!

follow the accessibility of ALS 40 ip 40

delay the decline 90 60

!

interface Vlan1

Description * INTERFACE LAN 90.0.0.x network * $FW_INSIDE$

IP 90.0.0.254 255.255.255.0

IP nat inside

IP virtual-reassembly

IP tcp adjust-mss 1452

route WEBPBR card intellectual property policy

!

interface Vlan10

Description * INTERFACE LAN NET 192.168.0.x * $FW_INSIDE$

IP 192.168.0.254 255.255.255.0

IP nat inside

IP helper 90.0.0.2

IP virtual-reassembly

route WEBPBR card intellectual property policy

!

! Static routes

IP forward-Protocol ND

IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 90.0.0.50 track 20

IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 197.164.245.109 200

IP route 8.8.8.8 255.255.255.255 197.164.245.109 permanent

IP route 10.250.10.0 255.255.255.0 90.0.0.50 permanent

IP route 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 90.0.0.50 permanent

IP route 208.67.220.220 255.255.255.255 197.164.245.109 permanent

WEBTRAFFIC extended IP access list
deny ip any host 208.67.222.222
deny ip any 172.20.0.0 0.0.255.255
refuse the host tcp 90.0.0.2 any eq www
refuse 90.0.0.14 tcp host any eq www
refuse 90.0.0.235 tcp host any eq www
refuse the host ip 192.168.0.40 everything
deny ip any host 192.168.0.40
refuse the host ip 192.168.0.41 all
deny ip any host 192.168.0.41
deny ip any host 192.168.0.221
refuse the host ip 192.168.0.221 all
refuse the host ip 192.168.0.225 all
refuse 90.0.0.10 tcp host any eq www
deny ip any host 192.168.0.225
refuse 90.0.0.11 tcp host any eq www
refuse 90.0.0.9 tcp host any eq www
refuse 90.0.0.8 tcp host any eq www
refuse 90.0.0.7 tcp host any eq www
refuse 90.0.0.6 tcp host any eq www
refuse the 90.0.0.1 tcp host any eq www
refuse 90.0.0.13 tcp host any eq www
refuse 90.0.0.200 tcp host any eq www
permit tcp any any eq www
allow the host ip 192.168.0.131 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.130 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.132 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.133 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.134 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.135 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.136 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.137 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.138 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.139 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.140 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.141 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.142 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.143 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.144 a
allow the host ip 192.168.0.145 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.146 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.147 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.148 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.149 one
allow the host ip 192.168.0.150 one
allow the host ip 90.0.0.80 one
allow the host ip 90.0.0.81 one
allow the host ip 90.0.0.82 one
allow the host ip 90.0.0.83 one
allow the host ip 90.0.0.84 one
allow the host ip 90.0.0.85 one
allow the host ip 90.0.0.86 one
allow the host ip 90.0.0.87 one
allow the host ip 90.0.0.88 one
allow the host ip 90.0.0.89 one
allow the host ip 90.0.0.90 one
allow the host ip 90.0.0.91 one
allow the host ip 90.0.0.92 one
allow the host ip 90.0.0.93 one
allow the host ip 90.0.0.94 one
allow the host ip 90.0.0.95 one
refuse the host tcp 90.0.0.3 any eq www

ALS IP 40

208.67.220.220 ICMP echo source interface Vlan1

Timeout 6000

frequency 20

ALS annex IP 40 life never start-time now

allowed WEBPBR 2 route map

corresponds to the IP WEBTRAFFIC

set ip next-hop to check the availability of the 197.164.245.109 1 track 40

That is how we have it set up right now. If I put in a few lines above WEBTRAFFIC with:

deny ip any 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255

deny ip any 90.0.0.0 0.0.0.255

deny ip any 192.168.116.0 0.0.0.255

! Etc with all internal networks

* And then put at the bottom:

allow an ip

who will ALL break so we can not communicate with anything? Or is that what I did to do this, we get internal routing etc.? Also, I guess I'd put in 15 IP addresses that are coming in the SAA as well? (We have public IPS 14 (one for the T1 gateway) that would go as well?) I don't want to try to put in those at the top and make sure no one can do anything. I hope I made clear what I'm doing...

Post edited by: Ryan Young

I have not read this thread well enough to be able to talk to the intricacies of the issue whether this access will make what you want. But I can answer the specific question you are asking. Yes - the access list is top-down, transformed and if a few more top line in the access list matches, then treatment for this package will not get the license at the bottom of the access list.

HTH

Rick

Attempt to create overlay route map with...

Hi all

I am trying to create a route for the updated plan overlay direct semi. Currently, I'm trying to understand how the game a value in pixels in the command ForeignWindow transperant so I can draw my lines inside, then superimpose on mapview. It appers that the only possible pixel values available are between 0 and 255, which leads me to believe the transparency with this control is not always possible because with this limit, I can even clone the image under my control.

Is there a way I can manually pull on any other control to achieve the desired effect?

Kind regards

-J

Pixels have an RGBA value, where RGB is the color between 1 and 255, and A is the alpha value, carried out by Alpha Composition. For each pixel and it associated the pointer, R = [point], G = [pointer + 1], B [pointer + 2] = and a = [pointer + 3]. Focus on changing the alpha value of your pixels.

On a side note, I tried to do a very similar thing on another project. I don't know that it is possible, in some way, with a bitmap image.

Firewall router ios commands

In order to solve problems that result from a problem with a vpn connection, where the router contains an ios firewall, knowing the correct controls are essential. What are the proper commands that should be used for the display of information related to vpn problems? For example, on a pix commands show conn, isa to show her, see the ipsec sa, sh help etc exlate in the determination of the issues. What are some commands which correspond to these and others can be used on a router with a firewall ios?

Take a look at this link to learn more about the Cisco IOS Firewall.

http://Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/sw/secursw/ps1018/tsd_products_support_series_home.html

HTH

How to get the google - a route map?

I have a google map that I included in a mobile site, when you click on the link that includes the latitude and longitude of the destination, it opens google maps, but it does not recognize the current location to create the directions from, though even I have the settings on my mobile device configured to allow the location. Can you please help me find a way to get it so the person responsible for the search of the site can click on driving directions button that I put in place and it will calculate, for them, indications of their current location to the defined destination.
Thank you!

set up your route in google

Click on the menu item and select share & embed map.

Choose the short URL

Copy the URL address

In Muse, create a static image (maybe a graph of google map or what ever you decide to design) to use as the link and paste the code.

Note: using the Google map widget Muse does not work for what you need to do.

iOS9 send route map of the iPhone iPad

How to send an itinerary from my iPad to my iPhone, or save it in the cloud? Now, I want to talk about a place I pinned drop, not an address I can easily grasp. Address, it is not everywhere wherever I'm going.

On the app - side or nearby search box must be a share button - the square with the arrow coming out on top

Tap on that and there should be an option to send to your phone

(I'm on a Mac right now, and that's how it is on the Mac)

for the router privilege command syntax

Have a local installation of user name and pw. then configure private Level0 sh running-config exec.

But we will succeed as 10 lines of sh run when you log in as this user.

Tried to go to level 8 and got the same number of small sh run lines. Any ideas what we're doing wrong. ?

See online,

One more question-so at the level of the cmd, you are able to access is entirely dependent on who you identify you as and what level (or what the DGM) is / are assigned to that user?

---> Yes, which depends on the level of priv to user and the commnds

Also, I need to check for my client that the previous question is correct and that it applies regardless of the line you come in?

---> Line any here. Regardless of where the same user comes, priv lvl take effect.

Is there an additional granularity that you can assign to the VTY or Con (other than the ACL and access-class)?

---> I don't think.

Kind regards

~'JG

Note the useful messages

WS-C3750G-12 s with c3750-ipservicesk9 - mz.122 - 53.SE2 will not apply for route interface map VLAN

I'm not able to implement a roadmap for an interface VLAN on this three switch layer.

Switch:

WS-C3750G-12 S

IOS:

C3750-ipservicesk9 - mz.122 - 53.SE2

Route map Config:

access-list 151 allow the host ip 10.1.0.11 everything

!

TEST allowed 10 route map

corresponds to the IP 151

set ip jump following x.x.x.x (Public IP)

Used command.

interface VLAN2

IP route-matches of TEST strategies

I also do a show run all | I have the interface Vlan 2 and there is no config hidden for this too. Does not support this version of IOS.

I suspect it's because your other switches in the stack are not 3750-12s switch?

3750-12s switch running the model of aggregation by default but all other 3750 s cannot run office model.

Then on the master can try this-

"sdm prefer routing Office."

and then charge again.

Jon

Why "bgp bestpath missing-as-worst med" command does not produce the desired result?

Can dear all, someone tell me why "bgp bestpath missing-as-worst med" command does not produce the desired result?
And I use GNS3 to this practice, the IOS Version: 12.4 (3)
TKS...

Back to the beginning:
192.168.23.0/24 192.168.12.0/24
RA(F0/0)-(f0/0) RB (s2/0) - RC (s2/0)
[AS1] [AS2] [AS3]

Configuration:
* RA *:
A #do sh run (config - router). b r b
router bgp 1
no synchronization
The log-neighbor BGP-changes
1.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
192.168.12.2 neighbor remote-2
setmed map of nearby route 192.168.12.2 out
No Auto-resume

IP route 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0

setmed allowed 10 route map
the metric value 20

* RB *:
B (config - router) #do sh run | b r b
router bgp 2
no synchronization
BGP always-compare-med
The log-neighbor BGP-changes
BGP bestpath missing-as-worst med
neighbor 192.168.12.1 distance-1
neighbour 192.168.23.3 distance-3
No Auto-resume

* RC *:
C (config - router) #do sh run | b r b
router bgp 3
no synchronization
The log-neighbor BGP-changes
1.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
neighbour 192.168.23.2 distance-2
No Auto-resume

IP route 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0

But when I checked out table RB bgp, as below:

B (config - router) #do sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 2, local router ID is 192.168.23.2
Status codes: deleted, cushioning d s, history of h, * valid, > best, i - internal.
r SIDE-failure, stale S
Source codes: i - IGP, e - EGP,? -incomplete
Network Next Hop path metrics LocPrf weight
* > 1.1.1.0/24 192.168.23.3 0 0 3 I
* 192.168.12.1 20 0 1 i

The prefix is assigned a MED of 0, but also the best path value when I use "bgp bestpath missing-as-worst med" in how to configure bgp... :-(

Please take a look at the discussion on the configuration of drugs to an eBGP neighbor:

https://supportforums.Cisco.com/thread/343397?TSTART=0

Note that BGP MED is set to 0 even if the injected BGP route from a connected route.

The first time I came across this problem sending MED was there in a picture of 5-6 years service provider. Routes were injected into BGP with the command 'network', has been validated by OSPF routes or static to null0. Involuntary consignment of drugs was mess with load balancing between 2 links of our inbound traffic from the same upstream service provider.

Also note that if a route is learned via iBGP, border router removes MED before the road to advertising for an eBGP peers (i.e. the above comments apply a when a route is injected locally into the border and then router BGP sent to an eBGP peer).

I don't know what the cause of the problem that you said in your last post. It delivers last for a long time or that it does not change after a while?

p.s. Sorry, I edited post because I said "iBGP" instead of "eBGP" at some point.

route-map command

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for