Routes to PIX - Prioratization...

Similar Questions

• Basic router and PIX during installation of ADSL

  I have a router with a WIC ADSL card 1751, a 506th PIX and a 24 port Catalyst 2950. The office is connected via ADSL with a public IP address. I also have a router ADSL 837 (but I don't think I'll need with the map of ADSL in the 1751). I need to set up a WAN connectivity, a static tunnel site to another and also allow access to the Cisco VPN client. I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions or examples of configurations for me initially on the right track with this. I wanted to also be the router or PIX hand addresses DHCP. In addition, I never configured (ADSL) ATM card into the router. I don't know if I need to assign the public IP address or this bridge for the PIX.

  Thank you very much

  Hello...

  I presume that the firewall is connected to the inside interface of the router. the firewall's default gateway is the IP Address of the ISP router. right? Now, configure the DHCP protocol and other things as said in the previous post...

  On the firewall, all traffic between inside and outside is open. so, you don't connect on an inside vpn server. Let us know if you need more information.

  For site-to-site ipsec tunnel, refer to the following URL.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00801c4445.shtml#configs

  See the configurations on the PIX and replicate in your condition.

  REDA

• Place a FIOS for VPN router behind PIX 501

  I have a Verizon FIOS internet connection and one of their routers wide wireless broadband, and this is a configuration of base completely... their router DHCP and firewalls, and the connection has a dynamic address.  I would put the PIX 501 behind the Verizon router as one of its clients and make the VPN PIX of other PIX 501 at other locations, such as my entire network has access to remote networks.

  Is this possible, and if yes, any who could some suggest configurations (how to address internal and external, static routes ports that may be required somewhere, etc.)?

  Thanks for any help.

  When installing my FiOS, I had already asked that it be installed on the Ethernet cable. Don't know they need to do something for you to spend the coax to Ethernet.

  The best way to test it would be to find the Media Converter (follow the coaxial cable between your FiOS router to the demarc and there should be a box with a coaxial port, some phone Sockets and an Ethernet port). If you unplug the coaxial cable and plug a laptop computer on the Ethernet port, see if your laptop takes a public IP address. If Yes, then you just have to run to your PIX501 Ethernet cable and you should be ready.

  Just to note that Verizon, according to your region, reserved DHCP assignments. This means that you may need to call Verizon and ask them to release the previous assignment of DHCP-MAC addresses. I had this happen recently. They must release the assignment then your PIX will pull a new IP address and they will book your new IP - MAC address assignment. They do this to speed up the connection to a cold start time on the router.

  Basically, they are filtering by MAC address, but rather through a sticky ARP where they clear the entry, and then the next device that connects records his MAC address and then only that device is permitted to connect to this leg of the cable. So there is a bit of work you have to do, but the most difficult part would be sitting on hold waiting for a tech, if you call to Verizon.

• AAA authentication for external router through PIX 515

  I have been in vain, to get the authentication AAA works to my external router, through the PIX.

  When I connect the router directly within that network (bypassing the PIX) AAA works fine, so I know the configuration of the AAA works between the router and the ACS server.

  Initially, I got the PIX configured with a static map between a global external address 192.x.x.12 and a 10.200.1.187 for the ACS server local address, but that didn't work either. So, currently I am using NAT exemption for the ACS server, but it does not work either.

  If I activate the debug on the PIX package, I see the ACS authentication request and response between the router and GBA when I try to connect to the router, but it is not successful. After the three way TCP handshake, the router repeats it is last receipt, and then the ACS asked an RST.

  The attached diagram shows the simple connection that I'm trying to create.

  The configuration of the PIX is also attached. (too large messages size):

  Thanks in advance for your help. I tried EAC for two days and have not found solutions that look like this.

  Ron Buchalski

  What to do is:

  1 PIX:

  -static map the ACS/GANYMEDE to a public IP address

  static (inside, outside) x.x.x.10 10.1.1.25 netmask 255.255.255.255

  -otherwise, if you have enough public IP, use the port forwarding for card IP ACS to PIX outside IP of the interface, IE x.x.x.2, via a specific TCP 49:

  public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface 49 10.1.1.25 49 netmask 255.255.255.255

  * allow ACS talk to external router via public IP

  Create/add entry for ACL applied to the outside interface to allow the GANYMEDE Protocol + switch router external to the ACS:

  access outside permit tcp host XXX1 host x.x.x.10 eq 49 list (Ganymede + use tcp 49)

  outside access-group in external interface

  * x.x.x.1 = outside the router

  2 ACS

  -Add the outside router IP (FastEthernet face PIX outside interface) interface as a client of the AAA

  -Making of course secret key is identical at ACS and router

  3. the outside router

  -Add the ACS as radius-server using its IP public, as mapped in PIX which is x.x.x.10.

  -check the key AAA statement is accurate.

  The test without saving the config is outside the router. Save ok once confirmed.

  I have similar facility before, and it worked very well.

  Pls note all useful message (s)

  AK

• Routing of PIX VPN site to Site?

  I just configured my PIX to establish VPN site to site with my Linksys (1710 to follow).

  Looks like my SA and IPSec are set up, but I get no routing. When I do a tracert, my PIX transmits all traffic to my internet router and not through the tunnel.

  Any ideas?

  Here's my chiseled config (subnet/ip have been changed)

  access-list 101 permit ip 10.11.101.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0

  NAT (inside) 1 101 access list 0 0

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac mytransform

  MYmap 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  correspondence address 1 card crypto mymap 101

  card crypto mymap 1 peer set 1.2.3.4

  mymap 1 transform-set mytransform crypto card

  mymap outside crypto map interface

  ISAKMP allows outside

  ISAKMP key * address 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.255

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 1

  of ISAKMP policy 1 encryption

  ISAKMP policy 1 md5 hash

  1 1 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP policy 1 lifetime 1000

  But, for some reason, my pix custody transfer of VPN traffic to the internet rather than through my tunnel. I'm doing something wrong?

  Aaron,

  I've replied to you offline, try adding the following command on the pix (in configuration mode):

  ISAKMP nat-traversal

  And now try to ping to your customers of the remote peer, let me know the results.

  Jay

• Problem of routing in PIX 515E

  Hi all

  I have a problem here with the routing routing in PIX515E version 6.35. I have a few Client PC located in the DMZ of the PIX515E interface, they connect to the PIX using Cisco VPN Client (IPSEC VPN), once these computers can be routed to access servers (static route) located behind internal PIX interfaces. I have a few servers remotely with access to the Internet, the gateway router to connect remotely to PIX Outside (Internet) Interface using IPSEC VPN and then routed inside the Interface (static route).

  After establishing a VPN IPSEC computers Client behind the DMZ interfaces can access servers located behind the internal Interface of a PIX. So do the remote servers. However, the Client computers cannot access remote servers.

  I was wondering if there are any restrictions for the delivery in PIX?

  Thanks for the reply.

  Hello

  Thanks for posting, sorry for the late reply, been a little busy!

  I'm not to clear on how you route your networks, I personally try to be more specific in what is routed where when the static use of the routes that the large 16s prefixes.

  you have vpn l2l to allow remote access within your acl as crypto 172.16.0.199/32 to your server:
  Access ip 172.16.0.0 Remote_Server list allow 255.255.0.0 host 172.16.0.199

  and also you have cleared nat rule:
  NAT (inside) 0 access-list sheep

  for the resources of DMZ RA VPN 172.16.45.129 for server access through this VPN L2L wallpaper external interface, you need to activate in your acl L2L Tunnel end as well as for the valuable traffic.

  The end has access-list for the tunnel L2L is allowing the network of Client VPN ID?

  I would also like to add to your rule exempt Ant configuration on interface dmz as you do with inside interface

  NAT 0 access-list sheep (dmz)

  Let us know how it works, I'll be back on your config and after some more later.

  Concerning

• 3 interfaces and routing PIX

  Hi all

  I have a PIX 515E configured with 3 interfaces, exterior, Interior and a Tunnel interface to my VPN clients. VPN clients not only access within the network, I have to move them to other networks through the external interface. As you cannot route the IPSEC packets from the same interface its entry, which is why I used a separate interface for VPN clients. Default gateway is set to the external interface. Now the problem is that when the vpn users try to connect to Internet, Tunnel interface is getting traffic but does not send back as default route traffic is defined on the external interface.

  Tunnel interface is 192.168.32.253 and if I connect from a pc with the ip address of 192.168.32.50, its works perfectly fine and also routing traffic to other networks through outside as PIX knows where to forward packets. Can someone please help me solve this problem of routing in PIX.

  the Interior is 192.168.33.254 security 0

  the outside is 192.168.34.254 security 100

  The tunnel is 192.168.32.253 security 90

  NAT (inside) - 0 110 access list

  access-list 110 permit ip 192.168.33.0 255.255.255.0 any

  Thanks in advance.

  KAZ

  Unless you know that networks, clients must connect to it may not be a solution, given that it looks like you need the default routes two, one for traffic encrypted clients and the other for traffic not encrypted Internet. You may be able to create a NAT pool in the router that provides Internet access to the Tunnel interface so that all incoming client traffic is coordinated in this router to an address from a pool. That would make all remote clients look like they came from a subnet, so you wouldn't need a default route on the interface of Tunnel in the PIX. You will probably need to do this router's Internet interface an interface 'ip nat inside' because I don't think that IOS supports dynamic NAT pools with 'ip nat outside source. It sounds backwards, but I think it would work. You'll probably also want to use an access list or with the pool route map, NAT to only apply to the traffic to the Tunnel from PIX interface (i.e. VPN traffic), as I'm assuming that the same router provides Internet connectivity for the interfaces from the outside and the Tunnel to the PIX.

  Good luck!

• PIX, router/modem connection

  My network need additional security. I replaced the previous firewall with the PIX 515E. Not connecting to the router (DLINK DSL-G604T), there is no communication. How can I solve the problem

  What is the level of communication you have? Is this due to wiring problem (vs right croiseent UTP) or configuration?

  Make sure you use crossover utp. If this is already in place, make sure the router interface both pix is mode active/unshut. Other than that, check the IP asigned to the router and PIX interfaces + netmask. Other than that, maybe, you will need to allow icmp router to reach pix off interface (or any interface that you connect to the router).

  On the end of PIX, is on/flashing LED when you connect to the DLINK router?

  Rgds,

  AK

• Routing problem of inside inside via PIX

  Hello

  I use a Cisco PIX 506th Version 6.3 (4).

  My inner interface is 192.168.5.1/24. The interface connects to a Cisco Catalyst 4503, the interface in question lies in the VLAN 20.

  On the 4053, I recently created a new VLAN (30). This VLAN holds 192.168.6.0/24. On the 4503, I created an interface VLAN, which acts as a default gateway for the network 192.168.6.0/24, IP: 192.168.6.2. The IP address of the interface VLAN on 4503 belonging to VLAN 20 is 192.168.5.2.

  My hosts in VLAN 30 have 192.168.6.2 default gateway - the Cisco 4503.

  My hosts in VLAN 20 have default gateway 192.168.5.1 - the Cisco PIX.

  I am trying to establish connectivity between the 2 networks. When I try to install between 192.168.5.10 (a random host) and 192.168.6.10 (another random host), I see that the PIX complains of not having a route to 192.168.5.10 192.168.6.10.

  (Road No. 6-PIX-110001 to 192.168.6.10 of 192.168.5.10)

  I have however to add a lane on the PIX that presents itself as such:

  inside 192.168.6.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.5.2 1 ANOTHER static

  So I will try to explain the PIX she can find 192.168.6.0/24 through 192.168.5.2.

  With regard to the NAT'ing:

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  NAT (inside) 0 access list acl-sheep

  NAT (inside) 1 access list acl-inside 0 0

  I thought for a moment it could have something to do with NAT'ing, so I added this to the ACL acl-sheep:

  allowed to access list acl sheep line 4 192.168.5.0 ip 255.255.255.0 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 0)

  allowed to access list acl sheep line 4 192.168.5.0 ip 255.255.255.0 192.168.6.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 0)

  allowed to access list acl sheep line 4 192.168.6.0 ip 255.255.255.0 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 0)

  allowed to access list acl sheep line 4 192.168.6.0 ip 255.255.255.0 192.168.6.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 0)

  Because I don't want PIX of NAT traffic.

  After that, he always complains about not having a route.

  Does anyone have an idea what I could always try to solve this problem?

  With sincere friendships.

  Kevin

  Unfortunately, PIX does not route or redirect traffic on the interface, he received the package. Unlike a router, the PIX cannot route packets back through the same interface where the packet was originally received.

  CEC reference URL:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_qanda_item09186a0080094874.shtml

  Another suggestion for you, is if there are only a handful of hosts on the NET 192.168.5.0/24 needed to arrive at the NET 192.168.6.0/24 you can add a static route on them for use as the next hop 4503 to access the 192.168.6.0/24.

  Let me know if this helped.

  Sundar-

• PowerConnect 6248 routing problem

  Hi all

  I have a very frustrating problem with routing using a PowerConnect 6248 switch.

  Network configuration is the following:

  VLAN3

  172.16.0.254/24

  VLAN4

  192.168.0.254/24

  PC on each VLAN using the switch VLAN interface IP (x.x.x.254) as the gateways.

  Switch has configured default route to 192.168.0.248 which is a router with excess of 100 subnets frame relay cloud. 192.168.0.248 has routes suitable for all remote subnets via a serial interface, a static route to VLAN 3 (172.16.0.0/24) traffic through 192.168.0.254 and one way by default via a PIX 515 (192.168.0.253). Router and PIX is connected to access VIRTUAL 4 LAN ports. The PIX has a route to VLAN 3 traffic through 192.168.0.254.

  The problem is that VIRTUAL 3 all hosts on the local network cannot access the Internet. They can ping the gateways in the order - 172.16.0.254, 192.168.0.248 and 192.168.0.253. I have disabled IP forwarding on the router and the switch with no effect.

  I built this configuration in Cisco Packet Tracer 5.0 (it works) and we are running exactly the same IP configuration with a Nortel switch instead of the Dell 6248 (this also works).

  Absoloutely perplexed to find out what I'm missing! I also noticed that if I perform a traceback while in the CLI on the router using a source IP address of the interface VLAN that it blocks the interface on the switch.

  I would be very grateful to anyone who can punch me in the right direction.

  I've included the config switch below.

  Configure
  database of VLAN
  VLAN 2-4
  subnet of VLAN association 172.16.0.0 255.255.255.0 3
  subnet of VLAN association 192.168.11.0 255.255.255.0 2
  subnet of VLAN association 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 4
  output
  battery
  1 2 Member
  output
  IP 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
  no console logging
  no ip redirection
  IP routing
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.248
  bootpdhcprelay enable
  bootpdhcprelay IP_serveur 192.168.0.3
  router RIP
  no activation
  output
  interface vlan 2
  name of the "voice."
  Routing
  IP 192.168.11.254 255.255.255.0
  output
  interface vlan 3
  name "workstations".
  Routing
  IP 172.16.0.254 255.255.255.0
  output
  interface vlan 4
  "Name servers".
  Routing
  IP 192.168.0.254 255.255.255.0
  output
  level of 3c9fd59f1a240ff455a9d9e8eebae936 user name 'admin' password encrypted 15
  router ospf
  no activation
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g1
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2-4
  switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 1
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g2
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2-4
  switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 1
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g3
  switchport access vlan 2
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g4
  switchport access vlan 2
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g5
  switchport access vlan 2
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g6
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g7
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2-4
  switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 1
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g8
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g9
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g10
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g11
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g12
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g13
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g14
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g15
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g16
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g17
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g18
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g19
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g20
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g21
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g22
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g23
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2-4
  switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 1
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g24
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g25
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g26
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g27
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g28
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g29
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g30
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g31
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g32
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g33
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g34
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g35
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g36
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g37
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g38
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g39
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g40
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g41
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g42
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g43
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g44
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g45
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g46
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  output

  
  

• NAT Traversal on site to site VPN pix

  I don't think it's possible to implement NAT traversal between a site to IPSEC VPN using ESP tunnels?

  Our ISP to the remote end will provide only a public IP address and which is attributed to their router...

  Sites are using pre-shared keys and IKE

  for example...

  LAN-PIX1-ISPROUTER-INTERNET-ISPPATROUTER-PIX2-LAN

  I have attached the card encryption for more info

  Thanks in advance...

  I guess that NAT - T is most commonly used in a customer VPN environment, but I'm sure that its not limited to this type of connection.

  I just set up a VPN this morning with the help of a customer on a router running 12.2.15T and tested connection with NAT - T works very well by using IP addresses.

  NAT - T enabled by a NAT detection process, and there is that to protect the ESP of a change should work in both environments.

  I'll have a go in my lab, see if I can implement and check it.

  However by going to the original post, you say that only one address is available from the ISP, it is on the router for pix link?

  Where are the limits of NAT, I expect to be in the PIX, but it must be a public IP address on you interfaces also. You can then use the external address as endpoints IPSec, don't need NAT - T in any case.

• Using PIX 515E configuration require

  Dear all,

  Hi.Actually I need help for PIX 515E.Pls. check out the scenario, design & suggest?

  Pls. find the details following and configuration of VLAN attached router.

  # I want to put as

  «Spend my LAN on CISCO 2900 (range 172.16.29.X IP...» (25 PCs) - VLAN router - CISCO PIX - ISP public IP.

  # Now it's

  "My LAN on CISCO 2900 - VLAN (external) router - ISP.

  Details of router & PIX:

  #Router inside the IP - 172.16.29.1 (inside property intellectual as it is very critical that cannot be changed)

  Outdoor #Router ip - what ip should I use? (I tried with 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0)

  #PIX outside intellectual property - what ip should I use? (My ISP IP?-j' tried with 208.144.230.197 which is currently outside of my router)

  #PIX within the intellectual property - what ip should I use? (I tried with 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0)

  Connection ISP #My is directly from the ISP GW to an ethernet cat 5 on my router VLAN

  #I would allow www, FTP, web-based like Yahoomail... etc... & Messenger services

  VLAN router Config:

  Current configuration: 1028 bytes

  !

  version 12.3

  horodateurs service debug datetime msec

  Log service timestamps datetime msec

  no password encryption service

  !

  hostname VLANRouter

  !

  boot-start-marker

  boot-end-marker

  !

  activate the gcsroot password

  !

  No aaa new-model

  IP subnet zero

  !

  !

  no record of conflict ip dhcp

  DHCP excluded-address IP 172.16.29.1 172.16.29.240

  DHCP excluded-address IP 172.16.29.250 172.16.29.254

  !

  IP dhcp pool dhcppool

  network 172.16.29.0 255.255.255.0

  DNS-server 208.144.230.1 208.144.230.2

  router by default - 172.16.29.1

  !

  !

  !

  !

  controller E1 0/0

  !

  controller E1 0/1

  !

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/0

  IP 208.144.230.197 255.255.255.224

  NAT outside IP

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  IP 172.16.29.1 255.255.255.0

  IP nat inside

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  IP nat inside source list 7 interface FastEthernet0/0 overload

  IP http server

  IP classless

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 208.144.230.200

  !

  !

  access-list 7 permit 172.16.29.0 0.0.0.255

  !

  Line con 0

  line to 0

  line vty 0 4

  opening of session

  !

  !

  !

  end

  All advice is appreciated.

  Kind regards

  Hiren s Mehta.

  ORG Informatics Ltd.

  Bamako, MALI

  AFRICA

  Hi hiren,.

  See the answers below:

  #Router inside the IP - 172.16.29.1 (inside property intellectual as it is very critical that cannot be changed)

  When you upgrade the PIX router inbetween and your switch, you must put the PIX inside IP like 172.16.29.1 and change the router within the subnet to someother pool. Do the PAT on the PIX, rather than the router.

  Outdoor #Router ip - what ip should I use? (I tried with 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0)

  Router outside the property intellectual property will be that given by the ISP... The ISP would have given a public IP address for the WAN link. This cannot be changed.

  #PIX outside intellectual property - what ip should I use? (My ISP IP?-j' tried with 208.144.230.197 which is currently outside of my router)

  PIX outside IP must be comprehensive. ISP would have given you a LAN subnet. Use it. In this case, inside the interface of the router has an IP address from that subnet even...

  #PIX within the intellectual property - what ip should I use? (I tried with 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0)

  PIX inside must be 172.16.29.1, which will be the default gateway for all PCs. If you change this subnet, then the PC should have an IP address on the same subnet that has decided.

  Connection ISP #My is directly from the ISP GW to an ethernet cat 5 on my router VLAN

  didn't get it... is that on the internet router or switch?

  #I would allow www, FTP, web-based like Yahoomail... etc... & Messenger services

  If all these must be permitted from inside to outside, you have not open anything... by default, all traffic to the inside outside is allowed (except if you put a list of access denied)...

• VPN via Pix 515

  Hello forum, I have a question please answer if someone knows the answer...

  Here is my scenario:

  Central location Pix515 (192.168.0.0/24)

  Location 1: (192.168.1.0/24)

  Situation 2: (192.168.2.0/24)

  Location 3: (192.168.3.0/24) local pool for vpn clients

  192.168.0.0/24, 192.168.1.0/24 lan - LAN IPSEC

  192.168.0.0/24 for 192.168.2.0/24 lan - lan IPSEC

  192.168.0.0/24 to 192.168.3.0/24 ezvpn IPSEC

  Question:

  Is it posible to connect Location1 and Location2 via Pix, or Location1 and Location3?

  On encryption ACLs on each location of traffic destined to another location is included for the encryption process.

  for example, location1 acl:

  Access 100 per 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

  Access 100 per 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0

  Access 100 per 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0

  other locations have a similar LCD-s

  There is no problem to access locations 192.168.0.0/24, but traffic between sites does not work.

  I think that pix encrypt packets outside ariving.

  I know, it's possible on IOS with IPSEC over GRE tunnels with some routing, but PIX?

  Republic of Korea

  Hi Rok-

  Allows traffic between VPN sites does not currently work with Pix OS 6.3.4 and earlier. Code pix 7.0, which will be published later this year, will enable traffic between the same interfaces of VPN security level. This will allow talked to talk communication. I have configured the week last with Pix 7.0 beta code, so I know this is a new feature and it will work.

  IOS does not have this limitation with IPSec. The GRE is not required to IOS to make communication speaks to talk work, although it can be used.

  I hope this helps you understand what is happening.

  Please let us know this that followed by questions that you have.

  Thank you!

  Peter

  PS., pls remember to note the positions so others will know if we have provided you with the information you need!

• PIX, wiring question

  Hello

  We currently have a Pix of the 506th, int external ethernet is connected to our 1720 router ethernet int using a crossover cable. We are trying to replace the 506e with a 515e. In the quick start guide that it is said to use one of the provided patch cables. If someone could confirm the good cable for use between the 515e and the 1720 and also if the connection by using a passive filter would have a significant impact?

  Thank you very much

  J Mac

  You need crossover cable between the router and PIX,

  Use a crossover cable when connecting as devices such as the transition to a switch or a PC to a PC... PIX interface is as NETWORK card in your PC so if you connect PIX interface directly to the router (or directly to the PC) you have to crossover, if you connecting PIX to pass you need straight cable...

  M.

  Hope that helps the rate if it isn't

• PIX 501 basic Config

  I'm putting in place an internet service for some members of the service here in Afghanistan. We use the commercial internet (provided by satellite) to a modem that goes into my firewall 501 pix.

  Service that we bought gives us Ip 29, and now I just have it set up as such.

  Modem gateway: 10.124.48.1

  Outside the firewall: 10.124.48.2

  Inside the firewall: 192.168.1.1

  Global NAT pool: 10.124.48.3 30 (the rest of intellectual property s that are outside the package)

  On the inside of the pool of the host: 192.168.1.2 -.33

  DNS for inside customers: 192.168.130.30,.50

  Everything seems ok, as I use the PDM software to allow all traffic ip from outside to inside (I know it isn't the safest to do thing ~ and the fact that I turned a firewall $ 700 to a router for $40). I can browse the internet, but it is really weird.

  I.E.

  I can ping msn.com and www.msn.com , and it resolves the twice,

  But if I put msn.com in Internet explorer, it says cannot display the page, but if I hit the refresh like five times, it'll happen. If I navigate away from the page and then try to type in msn.com again (in the same window) I hit refresh 5 times, to get the next page.

  But if I type in www.msn.com it just generally well upward.

  Even when he says that the page cannot be displayed, I have her pinger running in background ~ so I know that I can get for it. Weird huh?

  I also have a question about licenses. When I get the pix firewall information, it says inside hosts: 10 but he let's have me 32 s ip for inside hosts. Does this mean that I'm having problems when I have more than 10 users browsing through the firewall? Or is that what I have as many hosts ip s?

  Thanks in advance for any assistance.

  1.) to refine the 10 limitation of host within the network you couold install another device inside network that PAT - translation of Port addresses that hide all the IP addresses behind his foreign address.

  All PC-> [device router/PAT] - [PIX Firewall] - [router]-> Internet

  (2.) to buy/pbtain a license longer write a mail to:

  mailto:[email protected] / * /

  The product update:

  PIX-501-SW-10-50 = software upgrade license for 501 10 to 50 users PIX = approximately 340$ US

  PIX-501-SW-10-UL = software upgrade license for the 501 user 10-for-unlimited PIX = about 400$ US

  3.) World normal political deadlock depends on your company security policy, someone should set one, many companys trust their employees and allow all outgoing traffic. Might be good to block traffic P2P, Multimedia Streaming stuff, but this is not possible with OS 6.3.4 Release. You must wait for PIX OS 7.0, which is not available for PIX 501.

  sincerely

  Patrick