Routing between two Vmware images (mode single host) running on mac 0sx 10.5.7

Hello

I have two VMware images: a windows 2003 server and another company of red hat running on my mac with vmware fusion. Two of them are to be only one host mode and I manually assigned a static IP address to those servers to vmware. Thier is a situation that I can't change the static IP address.

Vmserver1: 192.168.1.102

255.255.255.0

192.168.1.1

Vmserver2: 10.2.18.28

255.255.255.0

10.2.18.1

How to define two communications between these two servers. (sending between two servers).

Thanks in advance!

Happy the ifconfig worked for you. This is the approach I usually take too.

Tags: VMware

Similar Questions

  • Want to use internet to share WRV210 router between two LANs

    Hello

    I have the following scenario:

    A LAN has access to internet via ADSL through a Fortigate 50B (192.168.100.0)

    A new LAN (different segment) that should have access to the internet. (192.168.102.0)

    Two local networks need to have shared access resources among themselves.

    We have a WRV210 router between two LANs (192.168.100.0 WAN, 192.168.102.0 on LAN) configured in router mode.

    Resources work very well, but internet does not work.

    We receive answers internet addresses on 192.168.102.0 ping and tracert works very well, but we cannot navigate or connect to Skype, msn msg, etc..

    We made on fortigate 50B routes this way:

    192.168.102.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.100.102 internal

    192.168.100.102 is an address WAN WRV210

    We tried the gateway mode and internet works fine on 192.168.102.0, but 192.168.100.0 cannot contact 192.168.102.0 resources (obviously)

    What can be wrong in case of ping and tracert works very well, but nothing else works?

    Hi Willy,.

    You need the WRV210 in not the router mode gateway mode.

    Gateway mode active Stateful inspection, which will address translation from private to public IP addresses and NAT....

    "But I think that the VLAN on the router segments members to talk to other members on the other vlan, so your comment.

    Two local networks need to have shared access resources among themselves. "creates a problem.

    .

    A community previous publication says "with Port Based VLAN on the WRV210, there is no VLAN tagging and so on." It's more like say port 1 not to talk to port 2, because they are on separate physically designated VLAN (even if on the same subnet) and it is far as it goes. But with your configuration you want also to have the 2nd SSID do not talk to any wired client based on the RVS4000 as well? If so, this facility would not work because all wireless clients would be able to talk to cable customers and vice versa. But if you primary concern is simply to prevent the SSID 1 speaking with 2 SSID, it's doable in the page VLAN for the WRV210.

    So if you want the WRV210 to allow switching between the VLAN port basis, it won't work the way it is set up now...

    If you want to restrict access between IP hosts, I suggest using the list feature to access a managed switch that focuses on the PC or servers.  A switch may be as a series of 200 or 300 small businesses switch, see URL below...

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps10898/prod_models_comparison.html

    But then allow all ports to be a member of the VLAN by default.  I hope that I read your question correctly

    Best regards, Dave

  • Routing between two network cards

    I have 8 fiber switches that are configured to use a private network for management.

    The subnet is 192.168.8.0/24.

    I have a W2K3 (SERVER A) server with two NICS, a NIC (192.168.8.1) is attached to

    the 192.168.8.0 subnet and the other (192.168.100.14) NETWORK adapter is attached to the subnet 192.168.100.0/24.

    I put up two persistent routes of road between these NICS using the following commands:

    Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

    Pei route add 192.168.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.8.1

    I have an other W2K3 server (SERVER B) with a single NETWORK (192.168.100.12) card that must be able

    to connect with the fiber switches via tcp/ip. Packets should be routed to this server.

    On that I put in place a permanent route:

    Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

    Everything works very well.

    (Assumes that the SERVER-A and SERVER B are now turned off)

    I'm trying to reproduce this on my VMware ESX Server 3.5upd3.

    ESX server has two NICS, one attached to each of the subnets. I create a virtual machine to replace SERVER-a

    with the same number of network cards and the same IP addresses.

    I then create routes as follows:

    Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

    Pei route add 192.168.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.8.1

    PROBLEM: as soon as I add the second route I can no longer ping any server on the 192.168.100.0 subnet.

    This also causes connections to last very long.

    Do I need to implement routing between network adapters ESX scale to make this work?

    If so maybe want the command look like? If not, what could be my problem?

    Thank you for the helpful answers

    If you want to configure your machine as a router, you will need to notify the router is the next hop.  Now, the next machine break is its own interfaces, which will not work.  And since you are running some sort of routing protocol, provide two solutions to exit the server is not a good idea, because he doesn't know that one to use.  It will use 1 for some and another for some.

    Do what you intend (or I think you intend), you must delete the static routes and choose a default route, which will be your next jump.  This should be another router in your environment.  Then, the other servers that you want to route via ServerA, ServerA interface on this segment would remind you.

    Hope that makes sense.

    -KjB

  • Help! Static route between two router WRT160NL

    Hi all

    I have my internet connection to connect to my main router from Linksys WRT160NL (192.168.1.1) with 192.168.1.x.

    My 2nd Linksys router to connect to the first gateway as well.
    The 2nd router has the ip 192.168.1.100 WAN and it's a local subnet as 192.168.2.x.

    My 192.168.2.x machines can access the internet and connect to all the machines in the network 192.168.1.x.

    However, the 1.x network cannot access the machines on the network of the 2. And because of that, I can't share or print between two networks.

    I try to add static routes on my main router (192.168.1.1) with the road: 192.168.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0 and default gateway 192.168.1.100

    However, the road does not work yet.

    in any case to ensure that the 1.x network able to access the network 2.x and 2.x access 1.x file and print sharing.

    Thanks for your help!

    Gateway of the router does NAT who made the side inaccessible side LAN WAN, unless you configure port forwarding automatic or similar. If she would not make your LAN 192.168.1 would be accessible from the internet. Static routing will not change that.

    You will need to disable NAT (aka switch to router mode) on the second router. You must configure a static route on the main router then. However, most likely your network 192.168.2 * will not have Internet more because the main router will NAT for 192.168.1. * and no 192.168.2. *.

    If possible set up the second router as access point only and run a LAN.

  • How do you find the average value of all the data between two points on a single channel

    I'm tring to calculate the average value of all data points in a single field between two distinct points

    I rasthaus an illustration.

    Hi smoothdurban,

    I thought you wanted to specify the area of interest with the sliders of the band.  If you rather automatically define the area of interest based on thresholds, etc., we cannot see the interactive nature of the example I sent.

    What are the criteria used to determine the start and end of the region of interest lines?

    I would be able to type this out for you if you sent a representative data set ([email protected])

    Brad Turpin

    Tiara Product Support Engineer

    National Instruments

  • Maintenance - VMotion mode single host?

    If I HA and DRS in fully automated and I put a host in maintenance mode will all be moving VMS to multiple hosts or they will move to a single host, then DRS to multiple hosts? We have 23 hosts in the cluster.

    Thank you

    DRS will load balance the guests on the other hosts in the cluster.

  • Routing between two VLANs on a switch in series SG300

    I've seen a lot of messages from people with problems of traffic between the two routing VLANS with some complex examples.  Can someone show a simple example for a SG300 switch (in layer 3 mode) to set up the two VLAN and send the traffic between VLANS without an external router?

    VLAN1 10.10.10.0

    VLAN2 10.10.20.0

    I tried to do through the UI and can't seem to make it work.  It seems that it must be very simple, so maybe I'm missing something in the GUI.

    Hi Chris,

    I did 5 minutes of recording that showed how I configured the two VLAN on my SG300 switch and layer 3-switched between the VLANS.

    You have no trouble getting to the GUI, so you will have no difficulty to setup in a few minutes...

    • Be sure to use the latest version of the SG300 package, with a bearable CLI.
    • to save your changes to the configuration at the end of the process.
    • the IP addresses that you create will be the address of default gateway for PC hosts on VLANs specified.
    • Recording can be interrupted at any time to perform configuration operations.

    Recording is now available on the website of the WebEx service. Click on the link below to read:

    https://Cisco.WebEx.com/ciscosales/LSR.php?at=PB&SP=MC&rID=55688352&RKEY=05e1fc5fff0d05da

    Configuration of VLAN

    Monday, October 24, 2011 11:02 New York time

    5 minutes

    Have fun

    Best regards, Dave

  • Routing between two remote sites connected over the VPN site to site

    I have a problem ping between remote sites.  Now the Cryptography and no nat ACL's for different sites just to affect traffic between the remote site and main site. I tried to add roads, adding other subnets to the crypto and no. ACL Nat at the remote sites... nothing worked.  Any ideas?

    Main site:

    192.168.100.0 - call manager / phone VLAN

    192.168.1.0/24 - data VLAN

    Site 1:

    192.168.70.0/24 - phone VLAN

    192.168.4.0/24 - data VLAN

    Site 2:

    192.168.80.0/24 - phone VLAN

    192.168.3.0/24 - data VLAN

    Main router

    Expand the IP ACL5 access list
    10 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255
    20 ip 192.168.1.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255
    30 permits ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255
    IP 192.168.100.0 allow 40 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255)
    50 permit ip 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255
    Expand the IP ACL6 access list
    10 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255
    20 ip 192.168.1.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
    30 permits ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
    IP 192.168.100.0 allow 40 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

    Expand the No. - NAT IP access list
    10 deny ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255
    20 deny ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255
    30 deny ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255
    40 deny ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
    320 ip 192.168.1.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any
    IP 192.168.100.0 allow 330 0.0.0.255 any

    Site 1:

    ACL5 extended IP access list

    IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

    IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

    ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255

    No. - NAT extended IP access list

    deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

    refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255

    IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

    ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 any

    Site 2:

    ACL6 extended IP access list
    IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
    ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
    IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
    ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
    IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255
    No. - NAT extended IP access list
    deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
    deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
    deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
    deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
    deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255
    IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any
    ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 any

    What should I do for these two sites can ping each other?  I looked through the forums but can't seem to find someone with a similar problem, which has received a definitive answer.

    Thanks in advance!

    Hi, I assume that you need site 1 and 2 to communicate with each other via the main site right? If this is the case, then you need to set add the following lines to your ACL crypto:

    Main router

    Expand the IP ACL5 access list

    IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

    IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

    ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

    ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

    Expand the IP ACL6 access list

    IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

    IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

    ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

    ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

    Make sure you add these lines before the last permit

    Expand the No. - NAT IP access list

    deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

    refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

    refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

    Site 1:

    ACL5 extended IP access list

    IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

    ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

    IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

    ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

    Make sure that these lines are added before the last permit

    No. - NAT extended IP access list

    deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

    refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

    refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

    Site 2:

    ACL6 extended IP access list

    IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

    ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

    IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

    ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

    So make sure that these lines are added before the last permit

    No. - NAT extended IP access list

    deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

    So you're saying good enough your routers with these definitions which will be reached via one main remote sites (sites 1 and 2).

    I would like to know if this is what you need.

  • Route between two VPN

    Hi all

    I have searched endlessly around things online and try on the firewall and can't seem to find an answer to this problem. Its probably something really simple under my nose!

    I use an ASA 5510, which currently has some site to site VPN of distinct connections configured, linking to other Cisco devices on customer networks.

    I work from home, so also connect to our network by using remote access VPN (anyconnect) to connect to the network in the data center.

    Just to be clear, here's my amazingly stretched; network diagram

    -------------- ----------------------------------------

    The problem I have is that I can't connect directly from my house to the customer network, I need to RDP in a server in the data center, then from there, I see network clients.

    It routes to be installed somewhere? between VPN? Ive looked in the routing on the firewall options and cand seem to find something that works.

    I have searched for this and cannot find answers, even some sources saying its impossible. Surely not?

    I have put all your remote LAN segment in a group of objects.

    object-group network in REMOTE LANS
    network-object 10.151.30.0 255.255.255.248
    network-object 212.9.3.72 255.255.255.248
    object-network 10.0.21.0 255.255.255.0
    network-object 212.9.20.240 255.255.255.248

    access extensive list ip 10.0.20.0 outside_nat0 allow 255.255.255.0 object-group REMOTE LANS
    access extensive ip list outside_nat0 allow REMOTE object-group-LANS 10.0.20.0 255.255.255.0

    permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

    NAT (outside) 0-list of access outside_nat0

    Let me know the result

    Thank you

  • VMware image cannot see host

    Hello

    I installed VMWare workstation 6.5.1 on a server (windows 2003) Dell version with 2 NICs (non-associated) but I couldn't get the guest VM OS to see the host.  I set myself VMNet0 at the bridge to one of the network adapters on the host, but I still could not ping the host or anything in the network (from guest operating system) even if they are in the same subnet.   I can ping (of the guest operating system) other OS invited on the same host, however.  I can't ping guest OS to host either.   VMWare Server 1.0.3 used must be installed on the same host and everything worked well.   After I uninstalled VMware server 1.0.3 and installed VMware 6.5.1 the problem began.

    Any suggestions on how to solve this problem would be greatly appreciated.

    Thank you and best regards,

    Esdigee

    "You LOVE me, you REALLY LIKE me!" - Jim Carrey as Stanley Ipkiss as mask in "the mask".

    Laughing out loud

  • Configure two MS for two databases on a single host, EM for first DB cannot open

    Hi all

    My 10 g database version 2.

    In the beginning, I created a database called "ORCL" and configured the EM to her, not manually of course. and it was working fine.
    Then, later, I found that I need to install a second database called "ORCLDW", and since I have used DBCA to create, EM is configured automatically as well.

    EM for ORCL is: http://phoenixbai:1158 / em
    EM for ORCLDW is: http://phoenixbai:5500 / em

    the problem is that the EM for ORCLDW works perfectly fine, even if I can't open the EM for ORCL.

    When I use 'emctl start dbconsole', it works for a very long time, but still, he tells 'EM for ORCL is started successfully.
    However, when I try to open the URL: http://phoenixbai:1158 / em
    Once again, it lasts very very long and doesn't have to open it.

    Then, someone at - it never met the similar situtaiton?
    someone has an idea of what could be the reason? and how to check and fix it?

    I thank you very much in advance and wish you all a great weekend!

    PhoenixBai wrote:
    Hi all

    My 10 g database version 2.

    In the beginning, I created a database called "ORCL" and configured the EM to her, not manually of course. and it was working fine.
    Then, later, I found that I need to install a second database called "ORCLDW", and since I have used DBCA to create, EM is configured automatically as well.

    EM for ORCL is: http://phoenixbai:1158 / em
    EM for ORCLDW is: http://phoenixbai:5500 / em

    the problem is that the EM for ORCLDW works perfectly fine, even if I can't open the EM for ORCL.

    When I use 'emctl start dbconsole', it works for a very long time, but still, he tells 'EM for ORCL is started successfully.
    However, when I try to open the URL: http://phoenixbai:1158 / em
    Once again, it lasts very very long and doesn't have to open it.

    Then, someone at - it never met the similar situtaiton?
    someone has an idea of what could be the reason? and how to check and fix it?

    I thank you very much in advance and wish you all a great weekend!

    the default behavior for OEM is that it supports a single database for each host
    If you need to support multiple DBs, use Grid Control.

    BTW - OEM is NOT necessary to run or support of Oracle's RDBMS

  • How to make a route between two routers (networks) connected to the same switch?

    Hello guys, how are you?

    In my company, we have 2 internet routers more dsl router of data connected to 1 switch line

    the data row is used to connect the branches of our company together for network problems.

    the router 192.168.2.1 IP data

    internet routers IP 192.168.1.1 - 57.194.97.1

    We have 3 accesspoints wireless taking their internet of 192.168.1.1 oky guy

    what I want to do is when I connect to any wireless network to connect to the data line dsl with router 192.168.2.1

    When I use the ethernet on my pc I have IP addresses 192.168.2.222 for router data line and 192.168.1.222 for internet

    but the wireless is DHCP n that it is connected only to 192.168.1.1, which is the internet router, how can I do 192.168.1.1 192.168.2.1 when I connect

    using the wireless?

    I hope that you understand me ^_^

    Thanks in advance.

    Hello

    The question you posted would be better suited to the TechNet community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the support you want.

    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/w7itpro/

    Hope this information is useful.

  • Routing of traffic between two VPN Site-to-Site Tunnels

    Hi people,

    I am trying to establish routing between two vpn Site-to-Site tunnels which are destined for the same outside the interface of my Cisco ASA.

    Please find attached flowchart for the same thing. All used firewalls are Cisco ASA 5520.

    Two VPN tunnels between Point A and Point B, Point B and Point C is too much upward. I activated same command to permit security level interface also intra.

    How can I activate the LAN subnets traffic behind Point to join LAN subnets behind C Point without having to create a tunnel separated between Point A and Point C

    Thank you very much.

    Hello

    Basically, you will need to NAT0 and VPN rules on each site to allow this traffic.

    I think that the configurations should look something like below. Naturally you will already probably a NAT0 configuration and certainly the L2L VPN configuration

    Site has

    access-list NAT0 note NAT0 rule for SiteA SiteC traffic

    access-list allowed NAT0 ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0

    NAT (inside) 0 access-list NAT0

    Note L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB access-list interesting traffic for SiteA to SiteC

    access-list L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0

    Where

    • NAT0 = is the ACL to be used in the NAT0 rules that will exempt SiteA SiteC NAT traffic
    • NAT = is the line of configuration NAT0
    • L2l-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB = LCA in configurations VPN L2L that defines the SiteA LAN to LAN SiteC traffic must use the VPN L2L existing SiteB

    Site B

    access list OUTSIDE-NAT0 note NAT0 rule for SiteA SiteC traffic

    OUTSIDE-NAT0 allowed 192.168.1.0 ip access list 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0

    NAT (outside) 0-list of access OUTSIDE-NAT0

    Note L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEA access-list traffic for SiteA to SiteC through a Tunnel between A - B

    access-list L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEA ip 192.168.3.0 allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

    Note L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEC access-list traffic for SiteA to SiteC through a Tunnel between B - C

    access-list L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEC permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0

    Where

    • OUTSIDE-NAT0 = is the ACL to be used in the NAT0 rules that will exempt SiteA SiteC NAT traffic. It is this time tied to the 'outer' interface, as traffic will be coming in and out through this interface to SiteB
    • NAT = is the line of configuration NAT0
    • L2l-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEA (and SITEC) = are the ACL in the configurations of VPN L2L that defines the SiteA LAN to LAN SiteC traffic should use existing VPN L2L connections.

    Site C

    access-list NAT0 note NAT0 rule for SiteC SiteA traffic

    NAT0 192.168.3.0 ip access list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

    NAT (inside) 0 access-list NAT0

    Note list-access-L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB SiteC to SiteA interesting traffic

    L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB 192.168.3.0 ip access list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

    Where

    • NAT0 = is the ACL to be used in the NAT0 rules that will exempt SiteC to SiteA NAT traffic
    • NAT = is the line of configuration NAT0
    • L2l-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB = LCA in configurations VPN L2L that defines the SiteC LAN to LAN SiteA traffic must use the VPN L2L existing SiteB

    To my knowledge, the foregoing must manage the selection NAT0 and traffic for VPN L2L connections. Naturally, the Interface/ACL names may be different depending on your current configuration.

    Hope this helps

    -Jouni

  • Google maps 'directions' between two points stopped working in firefox

    When using google maps to find the route between two points "Get Directions", he will just stand here loading... never finish and showing the routes between locations.
    It used to work fine a month ago. I didn't expect the update to Firefox.

    I opened the Camino to test on this browser google maps and since I did open Camino in a month or so he asked upgraded but also verified 'Flash' and asked at this level because it was outdated. I have tried re google maps "get directions" between two points on Firefox after the Flash update and it worked!
    It is a pity that so much of the web is based on Flash. Yes its cool but its also a huge pain. I wanted to just quickly answer my own post in case others are having similar problems and simply update Flash.
    See you soon

  • VCD 5.1 routing between VCC-org-network

    Hello

    I want to route between two vapps in the Organization of two different vdc network. I found information on the guide of 5.1 admin vcloud, but it is not very clear on the external ip address of the network of the Organization of vdc.

    Example from vcloud 5.1 administration guide:

    External IP address of the router network network name specification
    VAPP 1 network 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.0.100
    VAPP 2 Network 192.168.11.0/24 192.168.10.100
    Org vDC 1 network 192.168.0.0/24 10.112.205.101
    Org VDC 2 network 192.168.10.0/24 10.112.205.100

    Where can I find the addresses 10.112.205.100 and 101?

    Thank you

    Dominic

    Gateway, properties, configure the IP settings

    or gateway, external IP allocations

Maybe you are looking for