RV042 VPN public ip

Hello everyone,

I ' v bumping my head again and again with this issue... I need to configure a tunnel ipsec VPN with a service provider, they require that the first negotiating phase vpn ip address is public (which is normal "Local Security Gateway") and the need to address public ip for the second phase ("group of Local Security") it is im having problems on the source of the request service must be a public ip address as well. When I created my tunnel with their configuration. I have no problem to have the tunnel connected.

The problem comes when I have to configure my computer with the public ip address and connect to the RV042 router in order to access the tunnel... So I tried to put a local ip address to my computer lets say 10.1.10.102 and then do a NAT with ip address public xx.xx.xx.37

When I do this i never send packets from my computer (which is a linux server bdw) through the VPN... and if I give the server the xx.xx.xx.37 address public ip with gateway xx.xx.xx.38 also packages do not go anywhere...

mainly the problem is to know how to configure my server or gateway to send traffic to my server through vpn! because the tunnel is UP. (remember that the only way that the service provider will acept the connection is with the public ip address on the bridge and on the group.

OK guys, I just managed to make it work! I just plugged my server on the DMZ port with the public ip address and presto! tour of 1to1 nat!

Tags: Linksys Routers

Similar Questions

  • Two RV042 VPN has been a problem to get to the third-party router

    Hello, I have two RV042 connected via VPN very well.    First network let's call A.A.A.A Second network have also RV042 to B.B.B.253.   B.B.B. network, we have Cisco router another provider to B.B.B.254.    On this second network configuration on B.B.B.253 (our default gateway) saying that all traffic will C.C.C.C I have routing tables (just an IP address not a subnet) must pass through the router Cisco at B.B.B.254 and the location of B.B.B.B works well.

    What I'm trying to accomplish, is the unique through the RV042 VPN network A.A.A.A than when I go to C.C.C.C of IP address and get passed out through B.B.B.254 (Cisco of the seller).   I had the seller put the roads in their router to be able to deliver the A.A.A.A network and can ping on both networks.   Specifically, I can ping from A.A.A.A to B.B.B.254.   However, I would like to install my on A.A.A.A routing tables so that whenever someone goes to the unique address of C.C.C.C it passed through the VPN to the B.B.B.254.   All my efforts have failed.   I do not exclude the seller screwed up somewhere, but have been working on this all day and am running out of ideas.  It's for all the suggestions and thanks for any help!

    Concerning

    It is not possible. The RV042 using a simple IPSec VPN Tunnel tunnel. Plain IPSec has routable interfaces. You cannot add static routes to handle additional traffic through the tunnel. IPSec will be tunnel only traffic that matches local & remote security groups. Because C.C.C.C is not part of a security group that he will not get in the tunnel.

  • Customer quick RV042 VPN cannot ping lan network

    Hi guys,.

    I just created a client2gateway on RV042 IPSec tunnel and use the remote PC quick VPN client tries to connect to this router.

    Fast VPN showed that the tunnel has been established. But I couldn't ping the LAN behind the router RV042.

    Can someone help me?

    Thank you.

    Hello

    Yes, you are right. To use the fast with RV042 VPN, it is necessary to configure the user name and a password for access to the VPN Client page. As this router does not support VLANs, you can only connect the VPN client to the LAN subnet (you cannot connect the client to any beach IP configured with multiple subnets)

    Kind regards

    Bismuth

  • RV042 VPN configuration

    I'm looking for help to the RV042 configuration for VPN access to local machines and Win 2008 Server.  History: had problems with remote printers created for customers log into old Linksys RV042 VPN Linksys software.  First Tech exposed server without security, and it had to be removed because he was attacked, but did not print problem.  2nd tech failed to get VPN to work after 1 tech.  3rd tech 4hours and I got the router is a piece of...  I am so on more than 1000 and unable to have a simple router put in place.  The current situation.  New RV042 with the V4.1.1.01 firmware, using the Cisco VPN client 5.0.07.0410, most of the 32-bit machines on network XP, a 64-bit win 7.  My customers do not have access to their data for too long and I need a quick fix.  Willing to pay, just the person to really know what they are doing.  Thanks in advance.  (I hope its ok to offer to hire someone!)

    Mike,

    I am sorry to hear that you're having these problems and even more sorry to tell you that you have problems with the client VPN Cisco 5.x because the RV042 does not support this VPN client. Cisco VPN client is an enterprise-level software utility that uses the IPsec protocols to connect. What you should use is Cisco VPN fast. Cisco VPN client authenticates in 2 phases while the RV042 and Cisco Qvpn authenticates in 1 phase. The router doesn't understand just how to manage connections from the Cisco VPN client. I've included a link to the Cisco Qvpn utility below. Hope this helps

    http://www.Cisco.com/Cisco/software/release.html?mdfid=282414010&softwareid=282465795&release=1.4.2.1&relind=available&rellifecycle=&RelType=latest

    Blake Wright

    HWC Cisco network engineer

  • Router RV042 VPN Client access from Linux?

    Hello world!

    I have a question for the creators and users of RV042.

    Is there a way to communicate with a Linux box for access on a RV042 VPN client? I'm trying to do that and play with the settings, but I am not able to connect. I tried profiles in OpenVPN, OpenSwan, kVPNc and others. For the most part, my problem is that all of these software require too many parameters and other certificates that only types that you can create on a RV042 (.pem files).

    Please let me know if any of you were able to connect to a Linux box for on a RV042 VPN.

    Also, I would ask the CISCO/Linksys people why they provide only a Windows client for this option? "Small companies" are devices not windows based commercial devices!

    Thank you!

    Zoli

    Good day Zoli,

    Unfortunately, there is not any Quickvpn client available for Linux and Macintosh which work together with the Small Business/Small Business routers Pro.

    If I share your dismay that we do not formally use Quickvpn with all Linux distributions or any Mac OS, we have seen limited success with solutions that allow the use of third party VPN Clients when used in conjunction with our routers.

    I'm curious to know whether or not you have explored Shrew Soft VPN Client (a simple Google search will yield results). I'm currently taking a look and to experiment a little bit on my end to see if there is anything we can get to work. If you can, please let me know what you use distribution, what version and a list of all customers third-party vpn that you used.

    Personally, I'd love to see the development of a guide that we as support engineers to help all of our Linux-savvy customer.

    Thanks for your patience!

  • How to configure RV042 VPN to use Windows 7 client native IPSec?

    The question is in the title, I want to make the Windows client compatible with my RV042 VPN because Shrew Soft VPN fail to tunel after that little time and QuickVPN do not support Windows 7 or a 64-bit version of Windows.

    Windows does not have an IPSec client, what they offer is a VPN client that can connect to PPTP, L2TP/IPsec (on IPSec), IKEv2. To connect directly to the router RV that our only option is to connect over PPTP once the PPTP server protocol is enabled on the router. If you have a server located behind the router, you can configure to be an endpoint to one of the above types. Don't know why, Mac and Windows don't have a naked IPSec feature built-in clients.

    Some third-party applications to consider:

    Windows: ShrewSoft IPSec Client

    Mac OS X: IPSecuritas

    Both are relative simple to set up and on the routers RV0xx work fantastic and an exellent substitute QVPN. With these applications you set up the tunnel as a group and use the "XP/2000 Microsoft VPN Client ' option." " This option is a bit misleading because it seems to imply that the native VPN client can support IPSec settings, when it referred only that a computer would use this option during its WAN IP address is not always known.

    I hope this helps.

  • Rv042 VPN Customer

    Hello

    I'm trying to configure the VPN but get no success, to my seat, I have a cisco-3825 Cisco-5515-x, at the office, I have 1 rv042.

    My site to site VPN configuration works very well. But what I want now all the internet traffic of my branch should move from my seat, with the seat only, IP as little of our app only works with our Office IP.

    For VPN Site to Site, I use 3825 and rv042, my 5515-x does not get used for this VPN, I use it for other purposes. Mode routed to the case where if it takes I can configure for VPN too.

    Any help or ideas will be appreciated.

    Thank you

    If you need to make the field of encryption .

    On the 3825 to the default route inside the ASA.  Then add static routes for the public IP addresses remote VPN concentrators on the external interface of the 3825.

    This could also be done using VRF if you hate a 'Data' or "AppX" license on your 3825.

  • RV042 VPN group & access rules

    I have install a GroupVPN and connect to the RV042 with the client VPN Shrewsoft, works like a charm as opposed to QuickVPN ;-)

    The firewall is configured with an explicit deny for RDP access rule to an internal server, can also be used to explicitly a rule is created for certain numbers of IP as a source. I noticed that I need to create an explicit allow rule for the subnet of the client Shrewsoft is using the virtual adapter or I won't be able to access the internal server via RDP through the tunnel of GroupVPN.

    Is it normal? I think that establishing a tunnel defies the rules created for a direct access to the WAN port.

    Peter

    Sorry, I got my signals crossed with my previous suggestion.  Your answer has cleared up my misunderstanding.  My rule was for a different purpose and it does not work for your situation, I thought it would be.

    redirect port (UPnP or redirection) replaced the firewall rules, but does not completely bypass their. He must work around the default rules for work, but don't not past rules customized.  The trick is to know the translation of transfer goes first, then when it is processed by the firewall, the destination is the IP and the port internal.  In addition, it would seem that VPN works the same way - allows to bypass default firewall but not custom rules.

    Since you want to double your security and have a non-standard port MORE limit access to specific IPs through the rules of firewall, then you are set up correctly.

    The VPN to bypass the firewall completely?   Maybe, but then you wouldn't have the opportunity to clients VPN filter with custom (without a separate section in Firewall VPN) rules.  Given that you have created a custom block rule, you must add an allow rule for everything that comes through the WAN (same VPN) port.   I agree it's annoying, but that's just the way the program is written.

    I didn't test the VPN rules, but I think you can handle this - the only variable would be you allow the public IP address of the remote network or remote LAN subnet range?  I expect the LAN subnet.

    ----------------------

    Other thoughts - I personally just use the non-standard port and leave the RDP Security to take care of himself.  My clients are very small, so the exposure and risk are fairly low.  For a client of profile higher or more secure, I would either put everything inside a VPN connection, or configure as you.  Of course, if the security is so important, maybe you should be on a more expensive (and capable) device?

  • RV042 vpn pass trough droping?

    Hello

    I have a Linksys RV042 (defined as a gateway, Firmware Version: 1.3.12.19 - tm) witch I use to balance the load. Two difrent ISP, one in WAN1 defined for ip automaticlly and the other in WAN2 with a static IP address. The two set MTU to 1492.

    On WAN2 I configured a VPN tunnel to another site where I have a Zywall 10w, witch works fine without any problems.

    In the building, we have about 30 computers. Some of them use software that works through a vpn connection. This vpn connects ok until a point when juicing it immediately and it does not connect at least that I reboot the Linksys.

    The newspaper does not say enithing.

    I discovered that when I change the MTU or renew the IP address of the connection drop.

    Is that it must do something with load balancing?

    It is out of memory?

    Discount to zero might help but you must reconfigure everything.

    reflash the firmware.

    HOEP that helps.

  • RV042 VPN tunnel with Samsung Ubigate ibg2600 need help

    Hi all, ok before I completely remove all of my hair, I thought stop by here and ask the volume for you all with the hope that someone can track down the problem.

    In short I am configuring a 'Gateway to gateway' vpn tunnel between two sites, I don't have access to the config of the router from Samsung, but the ISPS making sure that they followed my setup - watching newspapers RV042, I don't however see the reason for the failure - im no expert vpn...

    Sorry if the log file turns on a bit, I didn't know where the beginning and the end was stupid I know... any advice would be greatly welcomed lol.

    System log
    Current time: Fri Sep 2 03:37:52 2009 all THE Log Log Log Log VPN Firewall Access system
     
    Time
    Type of event Message
    2 sep 03:36:01 2009 value of VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] Inbound SPI = c3bdba08
    2 sep 03:36:01 2009 value of outbound SPI VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] = c664c1ca
    2 sep 03:36:02 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] > initiator send fast Mode 3rd package
    2 sep 03:36:02 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] Quick Mode Phase 2 SA established, IPSec Tunnel connected
    2 sep 03:36:02 2009 VPN journal Dead Peer Detection start, DPD delay = timeout = 10 sec 10 sec timer
    2 sep 03:36:02 2009 VPN received log delete SA payload: ISAKMP State #627 removal
    2 sep 03:36:02 2009 VPN Log Main Mode initiator
    2 sep 03:36:02 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] > Send main initiator Mode 1 package
    2 sep 03:36:02 2009 charge of VPN journal received Vendor ID Type = [Dead Peer Detection]
    2 sep 03:36:02 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation of Info]< initiator="" received="" main="" mode="" 2nd="" packet="">
    2 sep 03:36:02 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] > initiator send Mode main 3rd package
    2 sep 03:36:03 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation of Info]< initiator="" received="" main="" mode="" 4th="" packet="">
    2 sep 03:36:03 2009 Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] VPN > main initiator Mode to send 5 packs
    2 sep 03:36:03 2009 Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] VPN > initiator receive hand Mode 6 Pack
    2 sep 03:36:03 2009 log VPN main mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '87.85.xxx.xxx '.
    2 sep 03:36:03 2009 Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] VPN Mode main Phase 1 SA established
    2 sep 03:36:03 2009 log VPN [Tunnel negotiation Info] initiator Cookies = c527 d584 595 c 2c3b
    2 sep 03:36:03 2009 log VPN [Tunnel negotiation Info] responder Cookies = b62c ca31 1a5f 673f
    2 sep 03:36:03 2009 log quick launch Mode PSK VPN + TUNNEL + PFS
    2 sep 03:36:03 2009 Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] VPN > initiator send fast Mode 1 package
    2 sep 03:36:04 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation of Info]< initiator="" received="" quick="" mode="" 2nd="" packet="">
    2 sep 03:36:04 2009 value of VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] Inbound SPI = c3bdba09
    2 sep 03:36:04 2009 value of outbound SPI VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] = e3da1469
    2 sep 03:36:04 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] > initiator send fast Mode 3rd package
    2 sep 03:36:04 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] Quick Mode Phase 2 SA established, IPSec Tunnel connected
    2 sep 03:36:04 2009 VPN journal Dead Peer Detection start, DPD delay = timeout = 10 sec 10 sec timer
    2 sep 03:36:05 2009 VPN received log delete SA payload: ISAKMP State #629 removal

    PFS - off on tada and linksys router does not support the samsung lol! connected!

  • PIX vpn public dmz

    Hello

    I d wishes to establish a vpn to a pix firewall 515 and pos version

    7.0 (5) with a public dmz and nat translation.

    inside: 10.5.10.0/24

    outdoors: 1.1.1.1/27 (Beach)

    DMZ: 2.2.2.2/27 (Beach)

    distance inside the network:192.168.20.0/24

    My area of encryption should be: 2.2.2.3/32--192.168.20.0/24

    announcement I have a nat rule, which is:

    NAT (inside the dmz) 2.2.2.3 10.5.10.28 netmask 255.255.255.255

    So basically I want to translate the connections coming from 2.2.2.3 to

    10.5.10.28

    the vpn is configured correctly and set up both sides, but the nat rule

    with the vpn doesn't work.

    Built of incoming TCP connections to outside:192.168.20.82/34237 4619

    (192.168.20.82/34237) at dmz:2.2.2.3/22 (2.2.2.3/22)

    but I can t see any traffic on the 10.5.10.28 Server, I see instead:

    Built of incoming TCP connections to outside:192.168.20.82/34237 4619

    ((192.168.20.82/34237) at dmz:10.5.10.28/22(10.5.10.28/22)

    any help would be great!

    Kind regards

    dural

    Dural salvation

    Could you specify just the line

    NAT (inside the dmz) 2.2.2.3 10.5.10.28 netmask 255.255.255.255

    should we read

    2.2.2.3 static (inside the dmz) 10.5.10.28 netmask 255.255.255.255

    Also are you terminating the VPN on the external interface of your firewall is to say what is the IP address of the peer to your end.

    You might not try

    static (inside, outside) 2.2.2.2 10.5.10.28 netmask 255.255.255.255

    * Edit - I meant

    static (inside, outside) 2.2.2.3 10.5.10.28 netmask 255.255.255.255 *.

    You need not actually traffic to DMZ, you?

    If not do you have IP addresses available in the public system on your external interface?

    HTH

    Jon

  • Help with presentation of VPN public ip to the customer

    Currently we have our vpn Setup so that they can talk side by side lan lan.

    ATT: contains relevant parts of the structure of vpn that work between offices.

    We now have a private customer that we need to configure a tunnel that will not address private ip. They want a tunnel Setup so that our public ip address is what happens in network. Any ideas on how this is possible with our current structure of vpn. They gave me here vpn gateway and the pre share but how can I introduce so something goes to them only watch our audience and not inside the server ip that sends to them. Looks like that everything I try to to the refuse aside here.

    Please take a look at the config attached to my lab and let me know if you have other questions. You are close to your configuration. You will be relying on the configuration NAT of output overload your IP to the external interface. When you configure the encryption card, you want to make sure that valuable traffic ACL includes the IP Address of the external interface as the source.

  • RV042 VPN site to Site

    Hello please could someone help me regarding my PROBLEM with VPN site-to-site.

    I have installation of gateway to gateway unfortunetly I don't have any static IP address, so I have 2 accounts of DynDNS.org on two installation Sites. The two RV042 connect to another router/Modem.

    I put the two as router in router Mode and not as a gateway.  The VPN status remains tab just to "waiting for connection" I can see the dynamic IP address to connect remotely on the main site and distance from each other.  I can ping so two dyndns names.  But unable to connect...

    The VPN log shows the following.

    ERROR: error report asynchronous network on eth1 to message to the port of 105.237.1.xx 500, complainant 192.168.137.153: no route to the host [errno 148, original ICMP type 3 code 1 (unauthenticated)]

    What is the main site and 192.168.138.0 the remote site, the main site has a subnet of 192.168.137.0

    Please could someone help me or point me in the right direction? Thanks in advance.

    Hi Stephen, it may be a few problems. The first is maybe that you said that you have a modem/router device, this means that it is for the RV042 nating.  If that's the case then the modems/routers upstream need port forwarding to go to the RV042. ICMP type 3 is a destination unreachable error. That means subnet remote th could not be reached by the applicant rv042. This can withdraw your NAT problem with modems/routers.

    So, first thing I would do is port before all the RV042 services to make sure that the firewall on the modems/routers aren't pipe upward works.

    -Tom
    Please mark replied messages useful

  • Cisco RV042 VPN hub and spokes, connecting spokes question

    Hello

    I have a few Cisco RV042 router and VPN links them with a hub and spoke topology.

    Each speaks VPN works, they manage to connect to the platform.

    The hub can see each VPN active rays.

    A computer under the hub can connect to a computer in any talks.

    A computer under any talks can connect to a computer running the hub.

    Which works very well.

    Now, what I really need, is to connect computers under a RADIUS to connect to computers under another spoke.

    It don't work.

    Current configuration of LAN:

    HUB IP / mask: 192.168.0.1 / 255.255.255.0

    Spoke1 IP / mask: 192.168.1.1 / 255.255.255.0

    Spoke2 IP / mask: 192.168.2.1 / 255.255.255.0

    I was wondering if the Cisco RV042 can be configured to allow that and HOW?

    If we can not do, should what other router I use as a hub? Should I change the rays as well?

    Thank you and have a nice day

    Hope that this document can point you the right direction.

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-12534

  • RV042 vpn - stops passing traffic but remains connected

    We have two boxes with a VPN tunnel RV042 connecting.  No problem, initiating the tunnel or passing traffic initially.  However, after "a certain" time (apparently random amounts of time) the VPN stops passing traffic.  Then, someone needs to go in web admin and disconnect/reconnect the VPN how it's ok once again.  What now happens several times a day.  FW ver is 1.3.12.6 on both sides - and addresses static ip from the ISP on both sides as well.  Any ideas on how to solve this problem?

    Thank you
    Drew

    Drew,

    Sorry I don't have a solution for you, but your post almost made me cry. We are experiencing the same problem, but with the VPN gateway to gateway static to the dynamic. I was hoping that the problem should go away if I could make the static dynamic side. It seems now I'm looking for other solutions. I wish you luck and thank you for bringing This gap to my attention.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Escrow Security Alert and keychain circle Notification cannot be stopped

    My iMac 27 "is EL CAPITAN 10.11.5 running Software CleanMyMac3 just showed a box indicating that it could force the following software to stop: "Alert security from trusted third party' and 'ring Keychain Notification." I confirmed the closure of the

  • Is it possible to exchange the US keyboard for a Japanese?

    See title - bought a Macbook from Best Buy American version, but can't seem to locate a cover of keyboard decent/sticker set for Japanese characters. The Apple store would be able to Exchange my English keyboard for a Japanese?

  • Default resolution of the games that I install

    my laptop is dv2000 and I have vista installed in it. But the problem is when I install any game in it, the default of my installed game resolution is 800 by 600 and sometimes the game does not allow to increase the resolution, running at 1280 by 800

  • Hotmail issue

    Hotmail. We continue to see the same question when we aspire in that the server is down for maintenance. He recommends that we optimize our browser. We have optimized all 4 computers at home. I even went to three other locations (different ISP) and g

  • Network three, not to see!

    I created a network called OFFICE with three laptops, two bb wireless and a bb thread, but each computer can not see the other and when trying to open other I tells me that I don't have permission, etc. Any help would be appreciated.  WittsEnd