RVS4000 routing between VLAN static?

Similar Questions

• Routing between VLANS in one direction

  OK... so I don't know if I can do this, but I'd like some input cases possible.

  Network equipment - RV120W, SF300-24

  VLAN10--> switch in VLAN, internet access - preferably just 3 addresses

  VLAN20--> switch in VLAN, initiate connection with VLAN10, VLAN30, access internet (I realize that there is a risk to security, but inevitable)

  VLAN30--> switch in VLAN can access internet

  VLAN40--> Internet access only, can not pass

  I the installation of circuits between the devices and assigns him VLAN quite easily, I'm not sure how (or if its possible) to create routing tables / settings to accomplish.  I am not able to do this on a SF300, but some tips you would know - even if I accomplish only part of what would be ideal.

  Hello Smith,

  I suggest the creation of access list (ACL based IPv4) for your configuration (assuming you do your routing inter - VLAN on the switch). If you are routing inter - VLAN on the RV120W, you may need to create the list of access on the router instead.

  See the article on more details on the ACL on SF300:

  Configure lists of access based on IPv4 on the 200/300 series managed switches

  Thank you

  Vijay

  Please note the answers.

• RV180W ping hostname between VLAN & different subnets

  Hello

  I had a RV180w with 1.0.3.10 closes. According to the name of position, I'm not able to resolve host names between different VLANS which affected to different subnets, for example, allows said I have the following hosts:

  CASA:

  192.168.241.100/25 (wired - VLAN 1)

  Router: 192.168.241.1

  DNS: 192.168.241.1

  XBMC: 192.168.242.100/25 (Wi - FI - VLAN 2)

  Router: 192.168.242.1

  DNS: 192.168.242.1

  If I try to ping from two sources to one of the two destinations, the only one I get is a message 'impossible '.

  Authorized additional information routing between vlans & proxy DNS and if I try to look at the hostname under the 'nslookup' command, I could not resolve the host name, but if I do a "ping - a 192.168.241.100 ' it is said ' response from CASA (192.168.241.100) blah blah blah."

  So what I'm missing here?

  Hi Bruno, you can usually solve different subnet host name because the host does not know the subnet that treats it as a security measure.

  Disable the firewall feature on your computers and which must fix, otherwise you will probably have to change the lmhost files.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Routing between two VLANs on a switch in series SG300

  I've seen a lot of messages from people with problems of traffic between the two routing VLANS with some complex examples.  Can someone show a simple example for a SG300 switch (in layer 3 mode) to set up the two VLAN and send the traffic between VLANS without an external router?

  VLAN1 10.10.10.0

  VLAN2 10.10.20.0

  I tried to do through the UI and can't seem to make it work.  It seems that it must be very simple, so maybe I'm missing something in the GUI.

  Hi Chris,

  I did 5 minutes of recording that showed how I configured the two VLAN on my SG300 switch and layer 3-switched between the VLANS.

  You have no trouble getting to the GUI, so you will have no difficulty to setup in a few minutes...

  • Be sure to use the latest version of the SG300 package, with a bearable CLI.
  • to save your changes to the configuration at the end of the process.
  • the IP addresses that you create will be the address of default gateway for PC hosts on VLANs specified.
  • Recording can be interrupted at any time to perform configuration operations.

  Recording is now available on the website of the WebEx service. Click on the link below to read:

  https://Cisco.WebEx.com/ciscosales/LSR.php?at=PB&SP=MC&rID=55688352&RKEY=05e1fc5fff0d05da

  Configuration of VLAN

  Monday, October 24, 2011 11:02 New York time

  5 minutes

  Have fun

  Best regards, Dave

• Subinterface-vlan-static route

  I tried the static route to the network 192.168.0.0/29 and 192.168.0.8/29. The result is PC1 still does not see PC3

  request: PC1 ping PC3 successful /vlan2

  photo here:

  Hello levantriet2881,

  I'm confused as to what you're asking.  On what router you add static routes, and what looked like the roads?  PC1 is unable to ping PC3?  But can ping to PC2?  Ping PC3 PC2 does What look like on each router's routing tables?  What is the configuration of uplink on the switch port look like?  Certainly need more information levantriet2881.

• RV110W VLAN routing between

  Hello

  I have a NAS I want to place on a VLAN separate from my the rest of my network using the rv110w. The rest of the network would still require a connection to the new VLAN.

  The router has currently only the default value as 1 VLANS configured.

  How to achieve this? I know how to create the VLAN, but am not sure how to assign memberships to the port.

  Thank you!

  HI Kirk,

  Thank you for posting. After you create the new VLAN, assign it to the port you want like "Untagged." Then go to the box to activate routing Inter-VLAN networking-> routing and at the bottom of the check of the page.

• Want to use internet to share WRV210 router between two LANs

  Hello

  I have the following scenario:

  A LAN has access to internet via ADSL through a Fortigate 50B (192.168.100.0)

  A new LAN (different segment) that should have access to the internet. (192.168.102.0)

  Two local networks need to have shared access resources among themselves.

  We have a WRV210 router between two LANs (192.168.100.0 WAN, 192.168.102.0 on LAN) configured in router mode.

  Resources work very well, but internet does not work.

  We receive answers internet addresses on 192.168.102.0 ping and tracert works very well, but we cannot navigate or connect to Skype, msn msg, etc..

  We made on fortigate 50B routes this way:

  192.168.102.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.100.102 internal

  192.168.100.102 is an address WAN WRV210

  We tried the gateway mode and internet works fine on 192.168.102.0, but 192.168.100.0 cannot contact 192.168.102.0 resources (obviously)

  What can be wrong in case of ping and tracert works very well, but nothing else works?

  Hi Willy,.

  You need the WRV210 in not the router mode gateway mode.

  Gateway mode active Stateful inspection, which will address translation from private to public IP addresses and NAT....

  "But I think that the VLAN on the router segments members to talk to other members on the other vlan, so your comment.

  Two local networks need to have shared access resources among themselves. "creates a problem.

  .

  A community previous publication says "with Port Based VLAN on the WRV210, there is no VLAN tagging and so on." It's more like say port 1 not to talk to port 2, because they are on separate physically designated VLAN (even if on the same subnet) and it is far as it goes. But with your configuration you want also to have the 2nd SSID do not talk to any wired client based on the RVS4000 as well? If so, this facility would not work because all wireless clients would be able to talk to cable customers and vice versa. But if you primary concern is simply to prevent the SSID 1 speaking with 2 SSID, it's doable in the page VLAN for the WRV210.

  So if you want the WRV210 to allow switching between the VLAN port basis, it won't work the way it is set up now...

  If you want to restrict access between IP hosts, I suggest using the list feature to access a managed switch that focuses on the PC or servers.  A switch may be as a series of 200 or 300 small businesses switch, see URL below...

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps10898/prod_models_comparison.html

  But then allow all ports to be a member of the VLAN by default.  I hope that I read your question correctly

  Best regards, Dave

• Problem with DHCP broadcast between VLAN

  Hello

  I trying to solve the lab that I set up, I have a problem with broadcast between VLANS with my DHCP. I looked around the vmware community to find my answer, but I did not who is right why I post here!

  So here's my situation :

  • ESX with 2 race of VM:
    • An R2 of 2012 Windows running a DHCP server with a configured scope
      • This virtual machine is assigned to the vmnic4 with the port VLAN 100 group
    • A Windows 7, which I use as a customer
      • This virtual machine is assigned to the vmnic4 with the port VLAN 110 group
  • Switch Cisco with a simple configuration:

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  Description LINK FOR ESX

  switchport mode trunk

  switchport nonegotiate

  interface FastEthernet0/24

  Description OF LINK ROUTER

  switchport mode trunk

  • Configuration of the Cisco "router on the stick:

  interface FastEthernet0/0.100

  encapsulation dot1q 100

  10.1.1.254 IP address 255.255.255.0

  interface FastEthernet0/0,110

  encapsulation dot1q 110

  IP 10.1.2.254 255.255.255.0

  IP helper 10.1.1.0

  
  

  The resolution of the problems that I did:

  • Affecting the client static IP and that both virtual machine can ping each other
  • Moving from the client to the same VLAN as DHCP server, and the DHCP server is to give the client an IP address.
  • Sniffing the packet:
    • I can see the client DHCPDiscover
    • I can see the router with the command "debug ip dhcp server packet" package passed on the 10.1.1.0.
    • I am not able to see the packets from the router to DHCP perspective

  That's why I guess miss me something ESX configuration.

  Thanks in advance for reading this post!

  
  

  PS: I've linked a vswitch configuration screenshot
  

  I think that you have configured an incorrect address of IP support, take a look at the following line:

  IP helper 10.1.1.0

  
  

  Your DCHP server is really 10.1.1.0? I think not, since 10.1.1.0 corresponds to the ID of the network 10.1.1.0/24 network.
  

• RVS4000 > ROUTER set to use custom dns?

  Here's my situation:

  my ISP assigns me a dynamic ip address. That's pretty standard. with my IP, I get my DNS settings as well. This is quite normal. I totally understand this.

  However, I want to use CUSTOM DNS. in windows, I can do this very easily. in the "Network connections" window, I select my network card properties. If I change the properties of the TCP/IP Protocol, I get the dialog box that is present in the "windows.png" file attached to this post. Here, I'm able to make my computer receives the dynamic IP address, but I then overwrite the DNS and use my own.

  simple.

  I want to do this on my RVS4000 router. I want to set up custom dns as shown in the subject.

  before you start screaming about 'server settings (DHCP)' section in the 'lan' tab in the 'setup', this is NOT correct. Why, you say? because when you configure it that way, the DNS information to DHCP clients. This does NOT change the dns from the ROUTER. I want to know how to change the dns from the ROUTER.

  still, the scenario of windows that I described above, I should be able to tell the ROUTER to use a custom DNS. BUT WAIT! before you shout "use the Internet Connection Type" "wan" in the "setup", take into account the fact that I have a commercial ISP and I have AI TO USE DHCP to obtain an IP address and connect to the internet. and believe me, I already tried workarounds... I put my DHCP router, got an address, then without rebooting the modem from the ISP, I changed my "internet connection type" to "static ip", using the information that I had when I was in dynamic mode. IT DOES NOT WORK. PERIOD. THE INTERNET DOES NOT WORK, DESPITE THE THOUGHT, IT IS MUST. I'm sure that the ISP is forcing something down my throat. Moreover, even if this DID work, it would be counterintuitive. Why? because if my ip was reassigned, I would lose the network connection. by design, I should use DHCP, and I shouldn't try to get around.

  so now that I've explained clearly the question and all of the obstacles, how can I configure DNS custom my router while in DHCP mode (just like windows has RIGHT WATCH IS EASILY POSSIBLE SINCE PROBABLY 1995)?

  Another question, you can ask yourself - why not just let my clients get the custom DNS and be happy? because I have that I still want to have access to some of the names of internal network. If customers have custom dns turned directly to them, they will never be able to resolve internal names. If I can just tell my router stupid to use custom DNS, clients always use the router as their DNS, and when the router receives requests, it can then determine whether the DNS query is internal and send it to the network card, or if she needs to go outside.

  I would REALLY appreciate to answer CISCO on this

  Aaron,

  I understand your frustration and I would like to help. If possible, can you send me your email address, because I'd like to set a time to talk one on one with you.

  Thank you

  John Clark

• Routing between vApps in the same ORG

  Am I right in understanding that the only way to route between vApps in the ORG even is manually by creating static routes?

  I have the static routing options under VAPP networks but not under ORG networks. The documentation says that there should be a static routing tab, but the single tab I have is DHCP. Y at - it a step that I missed somewhere?

  Thank you!!

  Ahh ok, if its isolated, you can't do that sort of thing.  Precisely, the docs say you can with a net org of this type?

• Director of the laboratory - routing and VLAN

  Hey,.

  So we are currently setting up Lab Manager in our environment, the environment in which we are setting up is a replica of our production environment. In the LABORATORY, we use 13 VIRTUAL networks.

  I use Vyatta to route between the VLANS right now, but we are running into a problem now, 13 VLAN... 3 more that it has configurable s NIC on a virtual machine.

  Aside from trying to convince everyone that we don't need of 13 VIRTUAL networks in a lab environment, are there other possible solutions or have you guys seen or been around something like this configuration before?

  (I've been throwing around the idea of setting up two VM running Vyatta and creation of a separate network who share the two interfaces on one VLAN from the 14th and then distribute the network load between two virtual machines but it's even more work that manually configure an instance of Vyatta in LM whenever someone wants a new workspace to test.)

  What do you think guys?

  I would say that you need to trim more work for yourself in the long term.   If you want a "real" picture of your lab and prod, you can see either plan b of your presentation above and buy physical passes capable of vlan trunking. Not much, we can hope for until Vmware gets beyond the limit of 10 - nic that seems more promising with all support for 10gbe cards now.  Some department stores I've seen can pull off a true mirror of their production environment as they can in their laboratory.  With virtualization, it makes it much easier to achieve.  I hope one day, we can be their one day ;-).

  See you soon,.

  Chad King

  VCP-410. Server +.

  Twitter: http://twitter.com/cwjking

  If you find this or any other answer useful please consider awarding points marking the answer correct or useful

• Routing between two network cards

  I have 8 fiber switches that are configured to use a private network for management.

  The subnet is 192.168.8.0/24.

  I have a W2K3 (SERVER A) server with two NICS, a NIC (192.168.8.1) is attached to

  the 192.168.8.0 subnet and the other (192.168.100.14) NETWORK adapter is attached to the subnet 192.168.100.0/24.

  I put up two persistent routes of road between these NICS using the following commands:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Pei route add 192.168.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.8.1

  I have an other W2K3 server (SERVER B) with a single NETWORK (192.168.100.12) card that must be able

  to connect with the fiber switches via tcp/ip. Packets should be routed to this server.

  On that I put in place a permanent route:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Everything works very well.

  (Assumes that the SERVER-A and SERVER B are now turned off)

  I'm trying to reproduce this on my VMware ESX Server 3.5upd3.

  ESX server has two NICS, one attached to each of the subnets. I create a virtual machine to replace SERVER-a

  with the same number of network cards and the same IP addresses.

  I then create routes as follows:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Pei route add 192.168.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.8.1

  PROBLEM: as soon as I add the second route I can no longer ping any server on the 192.168.100.0 subnet.

  This also causes connections to last very long.

  Do I need to implement routing between network adapters ESX scale to make this work?

  If so maybe want the command look like? If not, what could be my problem?

  Thank you for the helpful answers

  If you want to configure your machine as a router, you will need to notify the router is the next hop.  Now, the next machine break is its own interfaces, which will not work.  And since you are running some sort of routing protocol, provide two solutions to exit the server is not a good idea, because he doesn't know that one to use.  It will use 1 for some and another for some.

  Do what you intend (or I think you intend), you must delete the static routes and choose a default route, which will be your next jump.  This should be another router in your environment.  Then, the other servers that you want to route via ServerA, ServerA interface on this segment would remind you.

  Hope that makes sense.

  -KjB

• RV042G router - Inter VLAN

  RV042G router - Inter VLAN:

  Is this router supports 802. 1 q? Or do I have to connect to a router port by VLAN?

  for example. If I have 2 VLANS configured on a SINGLE SWITCH, do:

  (a) TRUNK VLAN switch and plug a port on the ROUTER?

  (b) connect a port on the ROUTER to VLAN1 and another port to VLAN2?

  Thank you

  Henrique

  Hello Henrique,

  The RV042G is not compatible 802. 1 q Trunking, so you would need a VIRTUAL local network connection.

  According to the switch, you may need to disable the tree covering both to make multiple connections to the same router work.

  Hope that helps,

  Christopher Ebert - Advanced Network Support Engineer

  Cisco Small Business Support Center

  * Please note the useful messages *.

• No SG300-52 routing inter - VLAN

  Hello

  I have a base on this SG300-52 configuration:

  • L3 is enabled
  • Latest Firmware is installed (1.4.0.88)
  • Vlan1 IP is 10.0.0.1/24
  • A PC is connected to port 1 (with IP 10.0.0.3)
  • VLAN99 IP is 192.168.0.2/29
  • A router is connected to the 49 port (with the 192.168.0.1 IP address and Internet access to the router is OK)
  • On SG300-52 default gateway is 192.168.0.1

  The SG-300:

  • I can ping the default gateway (192.168.0.1) and any Internet address, using 192.168.0.2 as address IP Source
  • I can't ping the default gateway (192.168.0.1) or any Internet address, using 10.0.0.1 as address IP Source
  • I can ping my PC (10.0.0.3), using 10.0.0.1 as the IP Source address
  • I can't ping my PC (10.0.0.3), using 192.168.0.2 as address IP Source

  There is no routing inter - VLAN, but I can't find how to activate...

  The complete configuration is the following:

  #show run SG300-52
  config-file-header
  SG300-52
  v1.4.0.88 / R800_NIK_1_4_194_194
  CLI v1.0
  router adjustment system mode

  SSD of encrypted file indicator
  @
  SSD-control-start
  config of SSD
  control of password file unrestricted SSD
  no control of the integrity of the file ssd
  SSD-control-end cb0a3fdb1f3a1af4e4430033719968c0
  !
  database of VLAN
  VLAN 99
  output
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 0001e3 Siemens_AG_phone___
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00036 b Cisco_phone___
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00096e Avaya___
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 000fe2 H3C_Aolynk___
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 0060 b 9 Philips_and_NEC_AG_phone
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00d01e Pingtel_phone___
  VLAN voice Yes-table add Polycom/Veritel_phone___ 00e075
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00e0bb 3Com_phone___
  Hello interface range vlan 1
  hostname SG300-52
  username privilege 15 c464af817287343305cbd6493c593885695df531 encrypted password cisco
  property intellectual ssh server
  Server SNMP Server
  The telnet server IP
  !
  interface vlan 1
  the IP 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
  no ip address dhcp
  !
  interface vlan 99
  name WAN
  IP 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.248
  !
  interface gigabitethernet49
  switchport mode general
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 99 unidentified
  switchport General pvid 99
  !
  output
  Default IP gateway 192.168.0.1

  You have an idea on the issue?

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  Hi Anthena1390

  My email is [email protected] / * /. When you reply to the email can let me know which devices need to communicate on VLAN 99. Is there a major reason for SG300 happen DHCP assumes that your router? Well I would like to add a few screenshots, they will show you how to properly set up a P2p link, assign DHCP pools, how to correctly add default routes. Send an email and lets get your problem is resolved.

• Problem with routing inter - VLAN... How to solve it?

  Hi all.

  I have a WRVS4400N in my office to have a VPN with our main customer and also to manage the entire network of small size.

  In two weeks, more or less we will change our office somewhere else, merge two in one.

  At its new location, we will have two different ADSL connections, and we will keep our separate LAN to the other LAN.

  The goal is to interconnect the two local networks in order to 'see' the machines on one local network to another, but keep the two local networks with their current configuration, subnet, etc..

  To achieve this, I created a new VLAN on the router and I have attached only port4 to this VLAN.

  

  

  As you can see, VLAN main has its own/24 subnet (10.148.145.0/24) and dhcp enabled (for addresses on my LAN) while the new VIRTUAL local network has its own 24 subnet too (10.0.0.0/24) but with the disabled dhcp (is a different LAN with its own DHCP server).

  

  

  

  

  VLAN 1 use ports 1-3 and VLAN 2 use the single port 4.

  Of course, I enabled routing inter - VLAN:

  

  To emulate the future scenario, I connected a router with an Internet port 4 with IP:10.0.0.2, and I therefore two different local networks.

  Well, the reality is this:

  -From my PC connected to the VLAN1 I have an IP address (assigned by my Cisco) and I see all my VLAN and I see 10.0.0.1 too (IP of the router on VLAN2), but I don't see any more (pings to 10.0.0.2 didn't answer). I can access Cisco router to 10.0.0.1 and 10.148.145.97.

  -My PC connected to the VLAN2 I have an IP address (assigned by the other router on 10.0.0.2), I see only my VLAN (10.0.0.0/24 IPs). I can access only Cisco router to 10.0.0.1.

  How can I do to enable these two VLANS to 'see' each other?

  How can I control access to the WAN port? I don't want machines to VLAN2 accessing internet through our router.

  Thank you and best regards!

  Hello Francisco,.

  In router mode gateway mode switch will turn off the NAT on the router. Which will allow to the vlan 2 does not to get out to the internet but also vlan 1 and which is not what you want. You may be able to create access rules and deny rules for not being able to get out of the internet... may create some default of the rules of the road as 0.0.0.0. Also, you may be able to create internet air to stop a certain subnet that it is able to get out of the internet as well.

  Regarding the VLAN talk to each other, everything looks good, routing inter - vlan, it is allowing the two VLAN to talk to each other and which is activated. What your default gateways are installed on devices you are testing? As long as default gateways on your PC and devices are pointing to the routers ip/gateway address, you should be good to go at this point.

  VLAN 1: default gateway should be 10.148.145.97

  VLAN 2: default gateway must be 10.0.0.1

  Other than that everything seems to be implemented correctly based on the images. The VLANs that you put in place on the ports are correct.

  Let me know your devices are configured on the rise and will go from there.

  Hope this helps,

  Thank you

  Clayton Sill