Satellite L755D - Webcam: very bad image quality?

Similar Questions

• SVE14123CNB with camera of 64-bit windows 8 is to give a very bad image quality.

  My sony vaio SVE14123CNB with camera of 64-bit windows 8 is to give a very bad image quality.

  I have compained several times to sony, but they said that there is problem with windows 8 and this laptop model.

  I think that this response is not the solution to the problem, as it is my work that still hinder once. This laptop has with exmor HD webcam, so we expect the quality of the picture from the webcam to be strong, but it is dark, blurry, vary hard to identify someone even. It is even lower than some old VGA cam.

  Please provide a rigid solution.

  Hello krishna_18,

  The most common cause of this problem is a poorly lit room.  Please try to use the camera in well-lit areas.  Since there is no light or flash on the camera device, it is not able to work as well in dark situations.

  As to the answer before someone gave you "problem with Windows 8";  What they probably meant is that this laptop does not come with any software the camera included.  Therefore, the "Camera" app Windows 8 is what is natively provided and used.  This application is very limited in options and resolution.  Using an alternative app camera of your choice can also improve options, parameters, and results.

• Satellite A350 - webcam is of poor quality

  Integrated webcam quality is poor (a350)
  Is this normal for this computer?
  Switches only light black screen shown in the night on Skype and is even worse.

  Hello

  The picture quality could not be better because of the darkroom where you use the webcam.
  You should increase the brightness in the room and need to set the parameters of the webcam in night mode!

  See this Toshiba document:
  + Bad image quality when using the internal webcam under dark light conditions +.
  http://APS2.toshiba-tro.de/KB0/TSB8A02G80000R01.htm

  or this:
  + How to change the settings for the built-in webcam If the image is very dark or black +.
  http://APS2.toshiba-tro.de/KB0/HTD9402LC0000R01.htm

• Toshiba Camileo Pro HD - bad image quality camcorder

  I recently bought a toshiba camileo pro hd camcorder due to its size and 720 hd quality.

  I connected through my wlt toshiba tv via the component cable, but the picture quality is bad. It seems very grainy. I thought it was the connection, but these have been checked and were perfect.

  IM pretty impressed if this is how it will run even if it was valuable.

  I'm doing something wrong?

  Cheers for all the advice

  Hello

  If you image quality is bad check details in the menu setting by choosing the right standard of TV (try PAL and NTSC as an alternative).

  And if the LCD screen image is unclear when shooting, try to turn the ring to 'Focus' on the circumference of the lens on the proper position: (general/Figure/Macro)

  Good bye

• IdeaPad Yoga 13 - HDMI of bad image quality on the TV 1080 p screen?

  Hi people, I have recently connected my Yoga via HDMI to my TV Samsung 40 ". Unfortunately, the image quality does not as good as my old T61 via VGA hooked up to my TV. Image via HDMI on my TV has some sort of "shadows" around the edges at all. I use a HDMI Basics Amazon cable that is capable of 3D and Ethernet over HDMI - I think this cable should be ok.

  Did it someone else faced with problems with the picture quality of the Yoga on a TV via HDMI before?

  Just for completeness: it was my TV sharpness settings. I had to turn off completely disable the artifacts.

• Satellite C660D webcam very poor quality

  Hello

  I bought my laptop 2 weeks ago and have only begun to use my webcam today.
  It is of very poor quality and flashes.
  What happens during the day in a good light as well when it's dark outside with light.

  My os is windows7 x 64.
  Yes, the plastic film is out of the front of it, I checked.
  I reinstalled the driver twice and is still the same poor quality.
  I restarted the process in both Device Manager.

  Please help I can't think of anything I can do.

  I put t know which model of laptop you have, but Satellite C660D has generally not HD cam but 0.3 M Pixcel camera only. And with this cam, you can't expect excellent image.

  There is nothing you can do. If the cam is installed properly, you can just try change the settings of the cam in the hope that the image will be a little better.
  When I compare 0, 3 m pixcel cam on old L300 and now 1.0 M (HD) Pxcel camera into my new P500 the difference is simply huge.

• Protect S100 - bad image quality on an external display with Windows 7

  I just installed Windows 7 but have lost my projector - external source - FN + F5 functionality
  It seems to work, but a bad quality image is on the screen and is then lost less than a second

  Are there drivers available for Windows 7, I need or it's another question?

  Appreciate any help

  Hello

  You have installed a display driver on your laptop? I doubt you will find a driver for Windows 7 at the moment, but in most cases, the driver for Vista works on Windows 7 too.
  Check it!

  Do you really need Windows 7 or you installed it? It s not released yet and at the moment, the socket driver is not very good.

  Welcome them

• Satellite M70 wireless very bad signal - Intel 2200 b/G card

  I'm very angry about this wireless, an Intel 2200 b/G card.
  The wireless card do not work very well. It connects to the AP, but the quality of the signal is very poor. It's the ping response from a robotics AP we:
  Ping 192.168.2.1 with 32 bytes of data:

  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 2ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 2ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 510ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 7 ms TTL = 255
  Request timed out.
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 1ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 1ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 40ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 1ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 307ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 827ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 31ms TTL = 255
  Request timed out.
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 4 ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 433ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 2993ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 15 ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 288ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 3931ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 20ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 3ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 894ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 563ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 48ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 1ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 1ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 2649ms TTL = 255
  Request timed out.
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 5ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 1ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 315ms TTL = 255
  Request timed out.
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 1ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 1ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 1ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 59ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 7 ms TTL = 255
  Request timed out.
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 1ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 1ms TTL = 255
  Request timed out.
  Request timed out.
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 3748ms TTL = 255
  Request timed out.
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 140ms TTL = 255
  Request timed out.
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 1195ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 106ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 1ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 177ms TTL = 255
  Request timed out.
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 3ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 1ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 1ms TTL = 255
  Reply from 192.168.2.1: bytes = 32 time = 235ms TTL = 255

  Ping statistics for 192.168.2.1:
  Packets: Sent = 55, received = 45, Lost = 10 (18% loss),
  Time approximate round trip in milli-seconds:
  Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 3931ms, average = 434ms

  What should I try? I'm using the latest drivers, change the transmitting power, try to manage the connection with MS Application and software for Intel wireless, I have the latest version of the bios, I change the default MTU for this connection. Nothing help me.
  The access point works very well, if I use a Wireless USB stick connection is ok, no lost package or 3 sec ping response

  Hello

  I've heard that Intel has a problem with this wireless network card, but I'm not sure if they have yet set.
  Have you tried the driver here:
  http://Downloadcenter.Intel.com/scripts-DF-external/Filter_Results.aspx?strTypes=all&ProductID=1637&OS FullName = Windows * + XP + Home + Edition & lang = eng & strOSs = 45 & submit = Go %21

  Good bye

• Help! -photoshop giving bad image quality

  Hello

  I need help please.

  I recently started taking pictures in RAW. Post processing is in camera raw, and then the images are saved in jpeg format.

  My difficulty is this: the images seem fine in camera raw or so open as a jpeg in a windows like photo viewer application, however if reopened in Photoshop they look terrible and are very grainy.

  I have the consistency of the parameters of the camera to monitor and Photoshop they are all set to Adobe RGB 1998.

  Thank you very much.

  Hi ianw

  Please save your settings as presets, Actions, work spaces (custom) .

  Then reset the preferences. See How to remove/reset the Photoshop preferences

  Concerning

  Assani

• Bad image quality of interactive PDF

  Help!

  A logo that is placed in InDesign and exported as an interactive PDF does not appear correctly.

  The customer says it is damaged on your laptop. Some letters in the logo seem more than others and some seem thicker.

  It is a vector file of RGB. I tried, eps, pdf, png, jpeg. I redesigned the letters. I copied and pasted into another document. I reduced the extent of it. I've copied from illustrator directly in Indesign.

  I changed the management of image compression, JPEG quality and resolution in the export to interactive PDF settings.

  I don't know what else to try.

  The customer declares to 200% the logo seems ok in acrobat, but full screen, the problem returns.

  Help, please!

  The version I.

  Open the logo and care than I and L are not replaced by a single line. Add one or two anchor points in straight lines.

  L and I are often converted in PDF export in simple lines instead of rectangles, because it saves space, but it allows the bolder appearance on screen.

• E525 HDMI bad Image quality

  Connect the laptop to my 32 '' Full HD LCD LG TV and the picture looks a lot worse than when my Macbook (running Windows 7) has been hooked.

  It is certainly not resemble 1080 p (even though it says it is). Maybe it is scaling of the 1366 x 768 on screen because the text is particularly horrible.

  Any ideas what I am doing wrong? There are a lot of options and I tried to play with them, but nothing helped.

  Thanks for your input colonel, but I have now solved the problem. The sharpness on my TV has been increased somewhat. I've now handed down to 50 and the image is now as good as my work Macbook.

• Bad picture quality

  After browsing through previous discussions I don't think that this issue has been addressed. I'm looking to take advantage of the features of full-screen Muse but am struggling with the very bad image quality on a 27 "screen. I import the files to 2560px width, but every time I have 'place' of these files, they automatically have the size to 2040px. In addition, Muse is downsampling these heavlily images resulting in very poor image quality. I'd rather have an excellent image quality and slow loading times than not.

  Incidentally, I noticed the "swipe" function does not work outside of the ipad and iPhone, although this was not always the case. At one time this feature was present on the sites office, too. Please advise!

  Finally, did anyone aware of a way to activate keyboard shortcuts (for example: left and right arrow keys navigate to the images in full screen, / arrows navigate between fixing elements, etc.).

  Thank you!

  Hello

  Regarding the browser keyboard shortcuts, we cannot conceive that the use of any widget, or you can go with any custom coding.

  But global keyboard shortcuts will work fine with pages on almost all browsers without incorporation of any code, you can check here:

  http://www.howtogeek.com/114518/47-keyboard-shortcuts-that-work-in-all-Web-browsers/

  With Image quality, Zak explained the situation is similar on these topics:

  http://forums.Adobe.com/message/6048743#6048743

  http://forums.Adobe.com/message/5461004#5461004

  Thank you

  Sanjit

• S70 satellite image quality - A - 11 H web camera is not good

  Hello

  Running windows 8.1 which came with the laptop.
  New out of the box.

  According to the title.

  I find the quality of the image of the camera very grainy color image, poor etc.

  When I start the webcam using the search bar on the right, he begins using the Microsoft application, when you access all the parameters that is available under settings/options is Photo image format, the grid lines, the location information.

  I've been in touch with Toshiba support who advised to do a refresh of laptop, I did.
  It made no difference.

  After which they asked me to find the Toshiba web camera application on your laptop, it should have been in the Program Files folder in the folder of Toshiba.
  This application does not exist on my laptop.

  Technology verified the same laptop model, that he was available, he said when he selected the webcam, he opened using Web of Toshiba, Microsoft no camera app.

  I looked at the other portable Toshiba with web cameras and found the picture quality to be better. Unable to get to settings and these computers portable on-screen and in demo mode, so locked up to a certain extent.

  I can't believe a web camera in this day and age for this value of laptop to have this bad image quality. My digital camera of 10 years ago has a better picture quality.

  I checked through the laptop, and I don't have this app installed.

  I have checked for software and drivers updated to my laptop and cannot find this application applies to my laptop. Etc drivers seem to be up to date.

  I would like to know, other users of this series S have any camera image quality problem.
  What application is used when the camera is selected, Toshiba or Microsoft.

  Is Toshiba web camera application for Windows 8.1, that I don't see not listed for 8.1
  This sounds like a hardware failure or a problem with the application/software.

  Any guidance or help on this would be appreciated, because I came to a point of the return of this laptop for a refund.

  Thanks in advance.

  D.

  Yes, I tried using FORCE!

  > Technology checked the same laptop model, that he was available, he said when he selected the webcam, he opened using Web of Toshiba, Microsoft no camera app.

  Toshiba webcam app is available for the system Win 7 but win it 8 and 8.1 of Windows system use the webcam from Microsoft to the own address application.

  > I looked at the other portable Toshiba with web cameras and found the picture quality to be better.
  Different Toshiba laptops are equipped with different webcams.
  Satellite S70 - A - 11 H was fitted with a * 0.92 mega pixel webcam *.

  For example a Satellite A660 was equipped with a mega pixel webcam_ _1.3M

  There is therefore a difference of resolution of the webcam

• Pictures still have very bad quality

  Hello

  First of all, I'm all new premier adobe.

  Now, I have a couple of very high quality images that are somewhere around 1100 x 1600 pixels.

  I'm on a mac and when I open these jpgs in the preview, they are fantastic, but after importation in the Prime Minister and adding them to my sequence, they lose crazy amounts of quality and a very bad image.

  Why is that happening and how can I solve this problem?

  Thank you

  LagMaster

  Yes, you have the video part correct... This map is roughly equivalent with mine except with half the RAM... but to manage a 480 p sequence should be quite adequate.

  Big question... Why is your sequence only 480 p? Yes, PrPro isn't always down at the level of the best, well some people seem to use it better that way I could. Still... taking an image of 1600 x 1100 pix and reject up to 480 throws a way a LOT of resolution. When you have moving images, you do not notice things so much... but a picture pixel for pixel who sits there for a while, to 480 p unless you view from a distance (remote TV 6 feet or better) or in a small part of a typical computer monitor, it will not be particularly detailed...

• Satellite L500 - Webcam is grainy

  Yes as shown, I have recently purchased a Toshiba satellite L500 on a month and half ago.
  When I used the webcam it was fine, but then, all of a sudden it seems he has turned REALLY grainy, especially when, in low light conditions where it is used to good work and be clear and sharp.

  I tried to uninstall the toshiba webcam software, the driver for the webcam and reinstall both without success. I can say that I have nothing to make this happen. The computer that is running windows vista.

  I uploaded a picture for comparison as to how it was first and how it is now, I hope that someone on this forum can help me to solve this problem without having to climb on toshiba.

  Thanking you in advance for reading and your answers.
  Zach.
  [Comparison of Webcam | http://i50.tinypic.com/2wftslx.jpg]

  (Note on this not too grainy picture sound I have a lamp just next to me, but too low light, it darkens the bunch and will really grainy)

  (I tried to change all the settings I can find any avil is, as you can prob see its less sharp, gritty, and the colors are disabled).

  Hello

  As far as I know the quality of the image depends on the light conditions of the surrounding area.

  Have a look here:
  + Bad image quality when using the internal webcam under dark light conditions +.
  http://APS2.toshiba-tro.de/KB0/TSB8A02G80000R01.htm

  Also check this doc from Toshiba:
  + How to change the settings for the built-in webcam If the image is very dark or black +.
  http://APS2.toshiba-tro.de/KB0/HTD9402LC0000R01.htm

  You can try to activate the Mode night in the webcam settings.
  To do this check the doc above.

  Welcome them