Secure domain problem

Ensure the domain Redirection - exception 1 domain does not work, but others do.   I tried all the common browsers with the same result. The login screen opens with this single IP address.  We use the platform for our Intranet so outside our internal IPS functionality is essential.  All solutions?   My number is 803-834-2111... email [email protected]

Shared certificate is used in British Colombia.

https://yoursite.worldsecuresystems.com would be your secure domain URL.

Tags: Business Catalyst

Similar Questions

  • HP mini 110 unlock, after successful computer unlock, website security certificate problem

    Web site security certificate problem

    Ok

  • Replace Server - domain problems

    I recently replaced our company Windows 2003 server with the new machine with Windows 2008 R2.  Our computer provider informed me that I could just the name of the new server and domain that matches the old and our 30 workstations (all XP Professional) would be able to connect to the domain without any problem.  The vast majority of our workstations must be restarted every day, because they lose the connection to the server.  I looked in the event log and found the common event ID: 5513.  He says, "the computer (computer name) tried to connect to the server (server name) using the relationshop of trust established by the domain (domain name). However, the computer lost the correct security identifier (SID) when the domain was reconfigured. Re-establish the trust relationship.  I did a little research and it looks like I need to reach each of the workstations with the domain name to resolve this problem.  Will it rename each computer or can I join with the same computer name?  This will create a new profile on each workstation to which I have to copy all the files from the old profile?  How would you recommend that I solve this problem?

    Thanks for your help, Todd

    Hi ToddVan Woerkom,

    Thank you for visiting the Microsoft answers community.

    The question you have posted is related to Windows Server and would be better suited in the MS TechNet Windows Server Forum. Please visit this link to find a community that will provide the support you want.

  • Secure gateway problem

    I have a problem with connecting through Secure Gateway.

    The following error occurs when access to the content environment using Secure Gateway

    -L' environment manages 2 servers Secure Gateway (load balanced using Fortigate)

    -Secure gateway servers are configured to run Connection Broker and RDP using the same IP address

    -Its configured to use an ssl wildcard certificate

    I cannot pntsc use with success (from the outside) and retrieve the office setting (on Secure Gateway).

    The client is configured as below (same FULL domain name is used that matched the wildcard cert)

    The proxy for Connection Broker and Proxy for the RDP traffic using the same IP and port, which is accessible from the outside because I can conect with success the broker through the Secure Gateway, what could be the problem with the part of proxy RDP? Specifc parameters for Fortigate?

    The bridge of desktop services shows that at the time of the error:

    10:56:19 - 2924:2772 - security [972] context OK

    10:56:19 - 2924:2772 - SSL handshake ok [972]

    10:56:19 - 2924:2772 - [972] given Extra after the SSL handshake

    10:56:19 - 2924:2772 - [972] reading data, 569 bytes

    10:56:19 - 2924:2772 - client full ticket, broker auth required = true

    10:56:19 - 2924:2772 - CProxyThread::validateTicket [972]: ticket timeout = 300, connect the window = 15

    10:56:19 - 2924:2772 - [972] CProxyThread::validateTicket: CTicketCache::handleConnectMsg returned 3

    10:56:19 - 2924:2772 - CProxyThread::validateTicket [972]: ticket not found in the cache, with broker ticket validation...

    10:56:19 - 2924:2772 - CProxyThread::validateTicket [972]: successfully validated the ticket

    10:56:19 - 2924:2772 - CProxyThread::validateTicket [972]: after validating, call the addTicketAfterValidateIf returned 4

    10:56:19 - 2924:2772 - CProxyThread::validateTicket [972]: ticket added, connection was not possessed or current thread added to the owners, after validation

    10:56:19 - 2924:2772 - CProxyThread::ConnectToServer [816]: disable the nagle algorithm

    10:56:19 - 2924:2772 - * Handle to Thread [972 816] 00000478, Id 00000ad4

    10:56:19 - 2924:2772 - Start [972 816]: 9:56:19.112 08/01/2014

    10:56:19 - 2924:2772 - [972 816] NL, XXXX, XXX, XXX XX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, Wildcard SSL, *. [email protected], of 10.3.72.32:3389

    10:56:29 - 2924:2772 - Server [972 816] Recv 0

    10:56:29 - 2924:2772 - [972] CTicketCache::handleProxyEnd returned 10

    10:56:29 - 2924:2772 - [972 816] proxy's client 0 bytes, 0 bytes Server

    10:56:29 - 2924:2772 - Server SSL channel cleaning [972]

    10:56:29 - 2924:2772 - [972] 37 bytes of handshake data sent

    10:56:29 - 2924:2772 - [972] 0000 15 03 01 00 20 4 b 5 a: 96 c2 e0 a6 e5 1 7 a 1 d 89... K.Z.... z...

    10:56:29 - 2924:2772 - [972] finished cleaning.

    10:56:29 - 2924:2772 - end of thread [972 816].

    Clues?

    People with the same problem, we managed to make it work using the Source IP Hash option in the Fortigate.

    Thanks Andrew for the fast support!

  • Need help to understand the security sandbox problem after changing Web host

    I am trying to switch my Web host 1 & 1 shared hosting to an IP address with a small company that specializes in Drupal sites and doesn't know much about flash dedicated.

    1 & 1 is always the Registrar for my domain, but I 'tidied up' YourGods.com on holistic servers and "stressed" my site DomainNameServers holistic rather than servers 1 & 1.

    After doing this, my Flash site (which is based on the Gaia framework) has stopped working, and the Flashplayer debugger, gave me the following errors:

    Error: Cannot load the xmlsocket://127.0.0.1:5800 policy file

    Error: Request for resource at the xmlsocket://127.0.0.1:5800 by the http://www.yourgods.com/bin/main.swf applicant failed because the server is not reachable.

    Security Sandbox Violation

    Connection to 127.0.0.1:5800 broken - not allowed to http://www.yourgods.com/bin/main.swf

    Someone to help me on another thread thought 127.0.0.1:5800 could mean that the problem had to do with my ways and I tried to access something on my local computer, rather than being a matter of cross-domain standard where one server was attempting to access files on another server without report.

    If anyone can clarify this?

    I googled 127.0.0.1:5800 and found some stuff on the loops between a server and the original computer, but I don't really know how to put it all together.

    Is it possible (with the flash debugger or other software) to step through my code actionscript with periodic break points so I can understand which line is causing the problem?

    Or a way to find out if there is a problem between holistic and my local or holistic computer and the 1 & 1 servers?

    Thanks for any help.

    127.0.0.1 is your local development server. It seems that your application is trying to access this IP address and unable to. You need to look at the source and find where it accesses to this and replace it with the IP address.

  • Link with the domain problem

    So, this site that I've just finished has a Flash homepage. My first in CS3 and it seems to work perfectly, except;

    links work when you visit. http://finessecuisine.com

    and the links do not work when you visit http://www.finessecuisine.com

    This is the same file that you see in both cases, so I don't understand what the problem is.

    Available FLA to http://pointbcommunications.com/FinesseHome.zip

    I'll take any advice at this point. Thanks for the research.

    you have an apparent (for flash) issue cross-domain security:

    SecurityError: Error #2137: security sandbox violation: http://finessecuisine.com/images/uploads/FinesseHome.swf cannot navigate window _self http://www.finessecuisine.com/ (allowScriptAccess is sameDomain). Attempted URL was http://www.finessecuisine.com/fc/page/people/.
    Global / flash.net::navigateToURL()
    to MethodInfo-(86)
    function /http://adobe.com/AS3/2006/builtin: apply)
    to gs::TweenLite/complete()
    to gs::TweenLite/render()
    to gs::TweenLite$/updateAll()

    to remedy this, use a local path to your sovereign wealth funds and other assets that you load.

  • 2016-002 App Store of security update problem

    I downloaded and installed Security Update 2016-002 10.10.5 three times, and it always appears as an update that is available on the App Store.

    It also appears as having been installed 3 times today (each of these updates in double has its own line) under "Installed updates in the last 30 days" under updates.

    What gives?

    This means generally that it is not actually be installed.

    I recommend that you manually download this update combo, which is supposed to have that security update as well and see if that fixes the problem and that he fixes what might be bad start.

    Download update of OS X El Capitan 10.11.4 Combo

    Sorry, I do not take that you're still in Yosemite! Here is this update of security for Yosemite itself that you can install manually.

    Download Security Update-2016-002 Yosemite

    By the end of 2012 mini Mac, OS X El Capitan 10.11.4. Apple Watch, 38 mm silver AL, Watch OS 2.2; iPad 2 Air & iPhone 6 + iOS 9.4

  • Security update problem - trying to update from McAfee!

    try to install McAfee 2011 3 users Total Protection with installation CD.  After spending the last 4 hours online with them, they claim I have windows update problem - shows up in the history as: for.NETon of a security update windows XP, windows Server 2003, windows vista, windows 7, vista windows 2008... KB2160841.  Finally, they said that the problem of 'failure' to be fixed through windows before my McAfee can be updated? !!! Help!  already four hours online trying to fix! :(

    See Andre.Ziegler response to a previous post, involving the KB:

    Error: WindowsUpdate_00000002 when installing .NET Framework 4 (KB2160841)

    http://social.answers.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/vistawu/thread/07e67bc5-1841-4972-Bac4-7a1d81dba8e7

  • Update of security causing problem

    July 15 security updates caused my computer does not recognize is not the secondary hard drive, which is the cd-rom drive, ideas on how to fix? I am running XP.

    http://www.Microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/list/en-us/default.aspx?DG=Microsoft.public.windowsupdate&cat=en_us_d99bb655-a5d5-4C07-bdb0-90caf9f30c42&lang=en&CR=us

    Microsoft.public.windowsupdate discussions

    The focus group above will help you with your XP update problems.

    XP discussion groups:

    http://www.Microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/newsgroups/reader.mspx?DG=Microsoft.public.WindowsXP.General

    Link above is to the XP newsgroups.

    There is a list of groups of discussion XP to the bottom of the left column.

    You get the help you need there.

    Here is the Vista Forums.

    See you soon

    Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

  • Windows update KB 2686509 security installation problem (error code is 0X8007F0F4)

    original title: I'm having a problem installing to a KB 2686509 windows security update.  The update downloads but continues to do not settle.  The error code is 0X8007F0F4.  What can I do to solve to partition?

    This installation has "failed" to install several times.  I keep getting the security shield on the toolbar.

    Hello

    I suggest you follow the steps listed in this article and check if this may help.

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/958051

  • Malwarebytes MS Security Center problem reports.

    After installing Windows Security Essentials (MSE), I ran Malwarebytes' Anti - Malware (MWB).  He reported this:

    Infected registry data items:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE Center\UpdatesDisableNotify (Disabled.SecurityCenter)-> Bad: (1) Good: (0) not-> no action taken.

    Is suggesting that MSE is to blame for this registry problem (if it is indeed a problem), or maybe it was a problem that existed on my system before I installed MSE and appear all the time because I ran MWB before installing MSE?

    How can I "fix" this issue?

    -Jim

    It's probably a pre-existing condition.

    Assuming XP, open the Security Center - of the control panel and click on change the way Security Center alerts me. You can enable or disable notifications as desired.

    -steve

    ~ Microsoft MVP Windows Live ~ Windows Live OneCare | Live Mesh | MS Security Essentials Forums moderator ~.

  • EA6500 FTP security & server problem

    I'm fairly knowledgeable about computers, but still learning my way around networking.  There are two ethernet cables to come to my house with optical fiber connections high speed.  There is a router on both of them and I have therefore 2 WI - fi networks.  I have a 2 t HD Seagate attached to the EA6500. Access to records is enabled and I have a name of user and password set up so I can see the drive of all my devices.  It is mapped as a network drive on a window 8.1 machine and a Windows 7 laptop.  I'll try to set up a ftp server on one of them, but when I'm at the EA6500 last week, I discovered that he has built in ftp server.  I turned and tried to open a session.  I tried networks as well as the 4 g network on my phone.  4g just give an error, but the connection request came when I was on one of the networks.  My credentials have been accepted, the ftp screen came, but no drive and no file.  I spent an hour for most useless on the phone with Linksys support, but have learned one thing: when I disabled access to the records, and then the disc with all the files appeared.  However, no newspaper was asked.  Enter "ftp: / / {ipv4 address}" product page ftp in my browser with all the files revealed.  In addition, access to the files on my network was of course now disabled.  I asked the tech by the lack of a connection is required, and she told me that I only knew that the address ip so no one else would be able to see my files.  I almost called her a stupid at this point.  Unfortuneatley she seemed not very security conscious or not even aware of how ridiculous that was.  I have re-enabled access to the folder and the disabled of course ftp again.  A refresh of the page in the browser returned to the blank page of ftp.  Is it possible to use effectively the built in Server ftp securely?

    Now if I'm in a remote location, I can connect account Smart Wi - Fi, will disable access to files and turn on ftp temporarily, then access my files and ftp, then backtrack.  It's a work-around that I don't like.  Someone managed using the Linksys FTP safely while maintaining access to local folders?  Also, is there a way to limit the connection to a particular username?  The customer accounts and admin (password w/router) have already been awarded to highly secure passwords, but the one I used for local access, not so much.  If I get this job, which apparently won't be enough, because it doesn't seem to be a way to make the distinction between a local and a remote user in the settings of the router.

    Hold on!   AHA!  I think that I thought about it!  The correct answer to your question should have been no. only, I created a user, but I did not know that the 'actions' were added to the user by clicking on the blue word 'actions' next to my username.  So NOW, when I try it in Google Chrome, voila! I can see the files.  I turned it back off again, so I can create a combo/part of the user with a good password.  One problem remains.  I tried adding the actions first by clicking on the admin user.  Now, I don't see a way to edit the admin user to disassociate the part.  I really didn't have admin access.  I was only adding the part as a test, but now it seems that it is there to say.  Please don't tell me I have to reset the router to get rid of it.

    What a pity that phone support is not able to explain on the management of stocks.  Just ask me about stocks helped helped focus my attention on the right box.  Thanks, chadster766!  I ' l count this issue resolved and leave the issue with admin for another ad if I can't understand me.

  • Vista security update problem

    Most recent update, check on my hard disk has been altered during the installation of Windows.  I had Vista Ultimate 32 bit on this drive.  Attempts to repair disk or restore disk has failed.

    My second drive has Vista Ultimate 64-bit installed.  When I started from this drive, Windows, installed the security update.  On the next startup, Windows wouldn't start: record on this disk as corrupt.  No luck with the repair or restoration.

    Everyone knows about this problem?  Does anyone have suggestions for a solution?  I don't want to lose all the data on these discs.

    Hello

    I suggest you refer to the link mentioned to fix the corrupt below boot disk:

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/927392

    Kind regards

    GauravPrakash - Microsoft Support
    Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

  • OfficeJet Pro 8500 A910 - security certificate problem

    When I try to access certain areas on my 8500 has requiring secure access, I get the following error:

    "You have received an invalid certificate.  Please contact the server administrator or email correspondent and give them the following information:

    Your certificate contains the same serial number for another certificate issued by the certification authority.  Please get a new certificate containing a unique serial number.

    " (Error code: sec_error_reused_issuer_and_serial)"

    How can I fix it?

    I called HP earlier this evening (25 Oct).  The man who answered was nice and helpful but had never seen the problem.  On his advice, I did a reset of the Internet Explorer options and I could pass by ignoring the problem error/warning on this certificate and change my settings.  However, I still had the annoying certificate warning message in the face all the time.

    For Firefox, I followed the instructions on the link below and has been granted access (without the annoying message after accepting the "defective" certificate).  It's a good permanent solution.  The same must be doable for IE...

    http://support.Mozilla.com/en-us/KB/certificate%20contains%20The%20Same%20serial%20number%20As%20another%20certificate

  • RV016 - Dual WAN & Secure connection problem

    I have settings wrong my RV016 upward to allow connections secured on our server. I have searched the forums and read a lot of posts and it seems that the protocol binding is the answer, but I can't make it work.

    We have a static double-WAN with 5 IPs configuration on our slow connection (a cable modem, 1 WAN) and a dynamic IP address on our fast (FIOS, 2 WAN). I use special NAT to send all incoming traffic on a static (on WAN 1) to static IP internal IP of our server. We use intelligent load balancing and (by a message I read) I turned off the detection of Network Service on the two networks.

    When I try to SSH from outside the server, I get through: I get a password and, if I get the wrong password I'm re - you are prompted for the password. But when I enter the password of the connection hangs. When I unplug WAN 2 I can connect on SSH without problem.

    I tried implementing binding protocol as follows: I created a service for SSH (TCP/22 ~ 22) and added to WAN 1. I remembered to turn it on. I played with a different IP address ranges, but nothing works (it is where I am a little out of my League). Here is what I tried:

    • Internal IP of the server at all: 10.10.10.10 ~ 10.10.10.10(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)
    • internal subnet at all: 10.10.10.2 ~ 10.10.10.254(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)

    In a lot of posts I read that binding protocol has solved bad people to a connection secure. What I am doing wrong?

    Thank you

    Alex

    Hi Alex, I think one thing that you should really consider is the DMZ to see if it localized to a problem of double-WAN or not. If the problem follows with two WAN upward in the DMZ, I agree there is something which perhaps does not properly.

    Another argument may be, if you are the type of thinking somehow that load balancing is messing things up, link ALL SERVICE for the server to a specific WAN, don't let not limited just a port. That can also give an idea, especially if the server works as expected.

    -Tom
    Please mark replied messages useful

Maybe you are looking for