SFE2000 and VLAN

Similar Questions

• PowerConnect 5548 and VLAN

  Good afternoon!

  I'm looking to implement a 5548 in our existing infrastructure. I want to preface this by saying that I am very new to networking.

  I'm looking to have at least two VLANS separated.

  -The first vlan for public sites face. These will have static public IP addresses.

  -The second VLAN is iSCSI traffic. I would like that it won't face public.

  Is it possible to Setup or should I be looking for a different solution.

  If possible, how should I go about setting up?

  Thank you!

  The port that connects to your router should be placed in Trunk mode with the VLAN you want in the trunk port. All ports are in VLAN1 access mode by default, this means that the port that plugs into your routing device is in access mode for VLAN 1 and VLAN 1 has internet access. For traffic VLAN 2 to access routing equipment that you will need to change cela port in Trunk mode and adds 2 VLAN as a VLAN Tag.

  468-page guide details where to put labeling.

  See you soon

• Subinterfaces and VLAN

  Hi all

  I was hired on with a State... Now its been awhile, but I do not remember how subinterfaces and VLAN all link together!

  Now correct me where I'm wrong (please), but them VLAN is created on the correct first switches?  When you create a VLAN on a switch you don't need ip or gateway address by default because them VLANS are the switch.  If you want intervlan routing you need a router.  Then, you configure a port trunking between the switch and router (ISL, 802. 1 q).  Now in the router, you can create a VLAN, and here you inter the ip subnet or the default gateway addresses correct?  This is where I get confused as to what reasons do you need subinterfaces?  How they roped VLAN and what would be the logical flow of data?

  Anyhelp would be appreciated!

  Yes you are right. If you are using the layer 2 switch and want to make the intervlan Routing then you need Layer 3 router device. But you must configure the interfaces sub with the default gateway to route traffic. Because there is a single trunk between swich and router so we need sup interfaces for multiple VLANs.

  Interface FastEthernet0/0.1

  Encapsulation dot1q 10 (10 represent 10 ID VLAN)

  10.1.1.1 IP address 255.255.255.0

  If you use a layer 3 switch, then you point all sub interfaces need so then you can create the interface vlan with the default gateway. You must enable ip Routing.

  Interface vlan 10

  10.1.1.1 IP address 255.255.255.0

  Hope this will help.

  Please rate if this can help.

  Thank you

• VPN and VLAN

  We have a site divided into 2 IEE802.1Q VLAN, using no switches Cisco. They have a PIX515 for Internet access. It is also configured to provide inbound VPN access for management and general purpose of access.

  In principle it is possible to set up a new VPN connection which is reflected by its interior traffic be tagged with a specific VLAN ID while all other traffic (including other VPN connections) remain without a label?

  If the PIX ends your VPN from the outside that the answer is no. If the VPN is coming from outside, and ending at the PIX she never travels a VLAN. VLAN tagging is used to identify what VLAN came from a source image and what VLAN it is intended for a current switch vlan can 'route' frame through the appropriate VIRTUAL LAN. Why you want to tag from outside VPN traffic? If it's to control access, you can specify 2 VLANS and VLAN 3 on the PIX (as long as it has code 6.3) and control what VLAN, you want that each group VPN access to through the use of the ACL. Each VLAN on a PIX is treated as a physical interface. It has its own security prefs (0-100) and can have ACL applied to them as well as the physical interfaces.

• Create 2 VLAN (VLAN 1 and VLAN 2)

  Hi all

  I need help and advice with my new Cisco SF300-48. I want to create 2 vlan (vlan 1 and vlan 2). The switch is set at layer 2.

  example:

  VLAN 1 (port 1, 2, 3), vlan 2 (port 4, 5, 6)

  VLAN 1 can communicate with each other (port 1, 2, 3) and vlan 2 can communicate with each other (port 4, 5, 6)

  But vlan 1 cannot communicate with vlan 2.

  Any help would be appreciated

  Thank you

  Johan

  Well, as far as I understand the message communication between the VLAN is not necessary. The thing is, that all ports LAN VIRTUAL (for example VLAN 1 with ports 1, 2, and 3) cannot communicate with each other. Did you check the configuration of the port / VLAN (VLAN configured to each port configuration right / right about the tag-no identified)?

• Management and Vlan native in different subnet?

  Can I have a management ip and vlan native in a different on AIR-1242 switch subnet and 2960?

  Native on switch = 1.

  The interface vlan 100 = 10.10.1.25X 24

  BVI ip to the vlan 100 = 10.10.1.25X 24

  -HM-

  Hello

  As far as I know, the management and the native will be the same... I guess... You have Vlan native as 1 on the switch and Int Vlan 100 on routing switch? Am I wrong? Let me know what are your needs... which will help me to help out you!

  for your question...

  Normally, we specify him vlan native on the switch and the AP so that communication happens... communication won't happen if there is a match of...

  Looking forward to hear from you!

  Let me know if that answers your question...

  Concerning
  Surendra
  ====
  Please do not forget to note positions that answered your question and mark as answer or was useful

• Controll SFE2000 and dissemination

  Hello world

  You can configure the limits of broadcast by port in SFE2000?

  Thank you.

  Hi Andre,

  Yes, you have the option to pay on a per-interface basis the broadcast packet and multicast storm, see my screen capture below from the SFE2000 big brother the SGE2000P.  The operating system is basically the same on the SFE2000 and SGE2000 the.

  If you have the rate limiting already defined on an interface that it will take precedence over the limits of the diffusion rate that you set.

  Best regards, Dave

  

• With the help of VLANS and VLAN Tagging is not working / no connection

  Hello

  I m trying to configure a VLAN between some virtual machines on ESX host 3.

  I want to do this way:

  http://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US & cmd = displayKC & externalId = 1004074

  I got 1 dedicated NETWORK adapter to each ESX host that is connected to a dvSwitch in which I configured a portgroup

  with VLAN ID 2121. I have configured each virtual machine to use this network.

  When I put the virtual machines on a single host, they are able to communicate.

  When they are placed on different hosts they are (if the VIRTUAL LAN is enabled on portgroup) not able to communicate.

  So I m assuming it must be a problem in the config NIC on the ESX host or switch.

  I m using a HP2910AL on which I activated mode trunk for each port that is connected to a NETWORK card with

  the dvSwitch/Portgroup I try to use for the vlan. In the hp switch, I have a default VLAN with ID 1 where

  the Ports are marked not signposted. I install a second VLAN on the switch with ID 2121 in which I scored

  This tag ports.

  Is there something else to do - perhaps side ESX host?

  I tried changing the settings as "forged transmission-> allow ' on portgroup and I found other things

  in the web, but always without success.

  Kind regards

  Patrick

  Were you referred to this guide? :

  http://CDN.ProCurve.com/training/manuals/2910-ATG-Feb09-2-VLAN.PDF

  "show vlan ports" would be my next check to make sure that you have connected to your ESXi host 3 ports in the vlan 2121.

  As Duncan has said if you have a VLAN ID on the portgroup in the vSwitch and you have the port on the pSwitch as trunk not acess and VLAN ID is allowed on the trunk port pSwitch you should be ok.  Just to clarify the trunk is 802. 1 q No 802.3ad.

  The reverse is not VLAN ID on the portgroup vSwitch, use coelio on pSwitch with VLAN ID.  Limited pSwitch port to a VLAN, this may be ok for you?

• Script to change the subnet and vlan.

  Hello

  Please can anyone help with a script to change the subnet and VLANs on all the esx host in a cluster for the vmotion and management network interface?

  Thank you

  Astra

  I guess it worked because you pasted an out front, so:

  Get-Cluster mycluster. Get-VMHost | Get-VMHostNetworkAdapter | where {$_.} PortGroupName - eq "VMotion"} | {} %
  Game-VMHostNetworkAdapter - VirtualNic $_ - IP $_. IP - subnet mask "255.255.254.0" - confirm: $false
  }

  I guess that makes still out:

  Get-Cluster mycluster. Get-VMHost | Get-VMHostNetworkAdapter | where {$_.} PortGroupName - eq "VMotion"}

  2 vmknis right?

  If Yes, then it should work I think.

• Existing vSwitch using and VLAN

  Hello

  I was wondering if it was possible to configure Lab Manager to use an existing vSwitch and VLANS configured in vCenter rather than create its own switch and VLAN?

  Thank you.

  Unfortunately not.  You will need to let LM create and manage their own groups of ports or switches.

  Note that:

  -When you bind a physical network to a vSwitch/vDS, LM creates a port group to represent the network (it also has an 'LM' tag in vCenter)

  -If you deploy a configuration "reserved", he made a vSwitch or vDS port group to represent the fence... and limit network traffic.  Again, when you look in vCenter, there should be an 'LM' tag to the object.

  Kind regards

  Jon Hemming, b.SC., RHCT, VMware vExpert 2009
  http://Twitter.com/vJonHemming

  If your question or problem has been resolved, please click the "right answer".  If someone helped him, please click "useful answer.

• Configurations of VMotion and VLAN

  Configurations of VMotion and VLAN

  ESXi 4.0 / 4.0 vCenter

  Can someone explain how to configure the ports VMotion using VIRTUAL LANs.

  Here's the design;

  Two network adapters for teaming on a virtual standard switch 0

  A network for management and another network for VMotion traffic

  The ports management group is on VLAN 103 and its default gateway is set to the network VLAN 103

  When I add a for VMotion VMkernel port group and configure the network, and I use the gateway of 103 VLAN by default I can't vmkping the other interfaces for VMotion similar configuration.

  If I change the default gateway settings and use VMotion gateway, then bad things happen, i.e. lose connectivity to the service console.

  Thanks,-Jeff

  Both an eon of ar sthjey the same physical segment (i.e., the plughed in the same physical switch) there will be no need for a gateway for the vmotion network address.

  If you find this or any other answer useful please consider awarding points marking the answer correct or useful

• Difference between groups of ports and VLANS

  Hi guys

  I read ESX Admin guide 2 times till now, but I still don't know what exactly is the difference between groups of ports and VLANS? I understand, but if someone asks me this question I will not be able to respond with confidence.

  Network also label: my understanding is that it's just label No technical significance in configuration?

  Thanks in advance

  One VLAN is one of the many settings that you can configure for a group of ports, you also have the tabs security, Traffic Shaping and consolidation of NETWORK cards.

  Port group name, you associate you a VM port group must be placed systematically on other hosts if you want to migrate or virtual failover from one host to another.

  Scott.

  -

• Question about VMKernel iSCSI traffic and VLANS

  Hello

  This is a very fundamental question that I'm sure I know the answer too, but I want to ask him anyway just to reassure myself.  As a precursor to my question, the configuration of my ESX infrastructure is best described here: http://www.delltechcenter.com/page/VMware+ESX+4.0+and+PowerVault+MD3000i.  Or more precisely, we have two controllers MD3000i.  Each controller has two ports and each port is configured on two different subnets, with every subnet connected to the different switch.  ESX host are connected to two switches.  The only difference for the guide, is we have two MD3000i configured the same, connection to the same switches.  Each MD ports is configured on the same subnet, but different IP addresses.

  At present, we are in the process of upgrading our two iSCSI switches of humble Dlink DGS - 1224T to Cisco 2960 T of.  The switches have been and continue to be dedicated to iSCSI traffic, however, I'm trying to set up VLAN s on the side of the switch.  Originally, we used the default VLANS on switches, however, after you have added an another MD3000i, noted the Support Dell best practices is to separate each on its own subnet and VLAN MD3000i iSCSI traffic. This would result in iSCSI 4 VLANS, two on each switch and two for each MD3000i.  Firstly, is this in fact of good practices?

  Second, if I migrate preceding 4 iSCSI VLANS, as each switch port will actually be an access port, will there need to complete the VLAN ID field in the VMKernel configuration page? Presumably, this field is used when the tagging VLAN is used, but as our switches do not need any other rocking trunk (as they are dedicated to iSCSI traffic), there should be no need to fill?  I guess it would be prudent to keep the two existing subnets, create two new subnets and make changes to an MD3000i and connection of the ESX host.  Provided the switch and switch ports has been appropriate configured with VLAN on the right, the rest should be transparent and he wouldn't be Intel VLAN in all ESX hosts?

  Would be nice to get answers and thank you in advance!

  Gene

  (1) Yes, it is best practice for ESX iscsi, having an independent network and vlan for iscsi traffic.

  (2) No, there is no need to mention anything in the area of vlan, if you use an access port. Its a mandatory thing than a choice. If you supply the id vland with access port, it loses connectivity.

  Please explain a bit why you need to create two different virtual local networks for each MD3000i. You are going to use several on the same ESX box iscsi storage? Alternatively, you use only a single iscsi and use these 4 ports for the same single VMkernel interface?

  NUTZ

  VCP 3.5

  (Preparation for VCP 4)

• SD205 (switch) and VLAN

  In addition to all my switches Cisco Catalyst (successful), I have a bunch of Linksys SD205 unmanaged switches on my local network.

  I want to configure my network for VLANs, which means I have all my managed Cisco switches will change to a "Routing" configuration   This configuration works well with Cisco Catalyst switches

  Question: the SD205 can operate in this environment?  I know I can't put one of the ports on the SD205 to be 'delivery', but I would like to connect the SD205 to a port of Cisco, which is "effective", so that the devices on the SD205 can communicate to the rest of the world.

  So far, I have not crowned success, then - maybe - they won't work in a shared resource environment.  Someone at - it a definitive answer?  If they simply can't do it, I will stop wasting my time!

  Thank you

  # A unmanaged switch is not compatible 802. 1 q. It will pass any frame ethernet that was 802. 1 q tagged. The only executives who pass through a switch are unmarked, frames that is the VLAN port on the catalyst native.

  If you want to use unmanaged switches, you have to connect to a port configured in mode access, Member of a single VLAN. For example, you can configure a port on the catalyst for access VLAN 10 mode and connect a switch to that port. All devices connected to the switch unmanaged will be VLAN 10. This as you can do.

  But several VLANS: alert the unmanaged switches is impossible because all frames ethernet on the switch must not be tagged.

• WLAN and VLAN

  Hi, I have a network with srw248g4p and srw224g4 WAP200 access points.

  also, the router is linksys, such as provided by the DSL provider

  Is this enough to configure different wireless LANs, so a WLAN can only connect to the internet, and other WLAN will be internal and internet network

  I would like to continue with regular, if possible WPA2 security.

  Do I need a WLC (e.g. WLC2106) to allow this, or can it be done with the current equipment. Are there other conditions that I have to take care of?

  Are there conditions for the router, or is it enough that it serves as a DHCP server?

  Thanks in advance

  'Stand-alone' (or 'stand-alone') means only "does not work with the controller. An autonomous access point is set up autonomous AP itself. There is no other way to do it with the WAP200. Access point unlike Cisco Aironet the WAP200 cannot be converted to a 'unified' in a WLC version controller. If you have a dozen WAP, you must configure each individually, i.e. assign the LAN IP address, set up the SSID, wireless security, VLAN, etc.. If you need to update firmware, you must update each individually. That's what I hear with "autonomous".

  You can use WAP to provide several separate wireless networks that connect to separate VLANs, for example a guest VLAN and your VLAN normal. Separation is achieved by the 802 tag. 1 q VLAN. You can WAP to connect to one of your SRWs if the connection port is configured correctly. You can also directly connect the WAP200 to any router that is able to manage the 802. 1 q VLAN.

  The problem of routing VLAN remains the same: If you have multiple VLANs and deliver them through a single router in the internet and perhaps some of the traffic between them VLAN you will need a router that is able to manage the 802. 1 q VLAN.