SH cdp neighbors port-channel command

Hello

I have a strange problem with the command sh cdp neighbors port-channel on my 3750 and 4500switches.

When I execute the command ' sh cdp neighbors port-channel. I don't see my say on this interface.

The command 'sh cdp nei' with the port-channel works very well and shows all my neighbors.

switch #sh cdp neighbors port-channel 1

Ability code: R - router, T - bridge Trans, B - road Source bridge
S switch, H - host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater, P - phone.
D / remote, C - AEVC, M - two port Mac relay

Device ID Local Intrfce Holdtme Port platform capability ID

switch #sh ether summary
Flags: - Low P - D bundled in port-channel
I have - autonomous s - suspended
H Eve (LACP only)
R - Layer 3 S - Layer2
U - running f - cannot allocate an aggregator

M - don't use, minimum contacts not satisfied
u - unfit to tied selling
w waiting to be aggregated
d default port

Number of channels: 1

Number of aggregators: 2

Protocol for the Port-Channel port group
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
1 Po1 (SU) LACP Gi1/0/1 (P) article gi1/0/2 P)

I tried the command on multiple versions of IOS, but always the same question. When I try the command on a 6506-E, it works fine...

This ordering platform is connected?

SWITCH2 # sh etherchannel summary
Flags: - Low P - D bundled in port-channel
I have - autonomous s - suspended
H Eve (LACP only)
R - Layer 3 S - Layer2
U - N running - is not in service, no aggregation
f cannot allocate an aggregator

M not in use, no aggregation due to minimum links has not met
m don't use, port do not associate due to not meeting minimum links
u - unfit to tied selling
d default port

w waiting to be aggregated
Number of channels: 7
Number of aggregators: 7

Protocol for the Port-Channel port group
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
1 Po1 (SU) LACP Gi1/1 (P) Gi1/2 (P)
...

SWITCH2 #sh cdp nei port-channel 1
Ability code: R - router, T - bridge Trans, B - road Source bridge
S switch, H - host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater, P - phone

Device ID Local Intrfce Holdtme Port platform capability ID
switch to Gig 1 / 2 123 S I Gig 1/0/1
switch to Gig 1 / 1 123 S I Gig 1/0/2

Thank you

Best regards

Joris

Hi Joris,

It is a known problem and is documented as a cosmetic bug internal. Logically speaking, CDP is not supported on etherchannel interfaces and 'sh cdp port-channel' command should not be available.

The platform of 6500, although the "port channel show cdp neighbor" returns the result, it's just for convenience and does not mean that the CDP is supported on the port channels. In fact, if you try to enable CDP on port-channel on 6500, it generates an error:

PO1 #int 6500 (config)

6500(Config-if) #cdp en

% CDP is not supported on this interface, or for this encapsulation

If you run "debug cdp events", you can see the packets exchanged on the physical interface rather than on the port-channel. Correct way is to check the neighborship of the cdp on the physical interfaces.

See you soon,.

Shashank

Please rate if you find the content useful

Tags: Cisco Network

Similar Questions

  • See the bandwidth for the Port-Channel on Powerconnect & Force10

    Reference Dell dear community,

    Y at - it a command CLI or GUI to see how much bandwidth result after having done a port channel in some port Powerconnect and Force10? Suppose we have 4 port 1 Gb and do 4 ports with 1 port-channel. So actually in this channel port have a bandwidth of 4 GB.

    In Cisco, with the command show interface port-channel 1, we get the result

    switch #sh po int 1
    Port-channel 1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
    Material is EtherChannel, address is 0064.4026.739a (bia 0064.4026.739a)
    MTU 1500 bytes, BW 4000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
    reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
    Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
    KeepAlive set (10 sec)
    Full duplex, 1000 Mbps, link type is auto, media type is unknown
    input stream control is turned off, output flow control is not supported
    Members in this channel: Gi0/1 Gi0/2
    Type of the ARP: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00
    Last entry of 00:00:00, 00:04:48 output, output hang never
    Final cleaning of "show interface" counters never
    Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/dumps); Total output drops: 0
    Strategy of queues: fifo
    Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
    5 minute input rate 2000 bps, 3 packets/s
    5 minute output rate 2000 bps, 3 packets/s

    But if we do this command on Powerconnect, the just result inform port that starts from the port-channel.

    Reference Dell #show interfaces port-channel 1 short

    Ch-Type Hash Type Min-links Channel ports local FRP
    -------   ----------------------------- -------- --------- --------- ---------
    PO1 Active: Static disabled people article gi1/0/1, gi1/0/2 7 1 article
    Item in gi1/0/3, item in gi1/0/4

    Type of hashing algorithm
    1 - the source MAC, VLAN, EtherType, source module and port Id
    2 - destination MAC, VLAN, EtherType, module source and port Id
    3 - source IP and TCP/UDP source port
    4 - destination IP and destination TCP/UDP port
    5 source/Destination MAC, VLAN, EtherType, MODID/source port
    6 source/Destination IP and port TCP/UDP source / destination
    7 - improved hash mode

    Can you help us find the answer?

    Thank you

    Kind regards

    Aziz

    The PowerConnect switches do not have the ability to show as much detail as the Force10 can. The RMON tables have an interface use %, what may be the closest we can do on the PowerConnect switch.

    #show rmon statistics

    I've seen some monitoring software which was able to question the switch via SNMP and get some information of bandwidth. However, this can be a bit inconsistent, according to which switch and what software is used.

    The MIBs/OID can be downloaded with the software switch.

    http://www.Dell.com/support/home/us/en/rc959303/products/ser_stor_net/networking/net_fxd_prt_swtchs

  • CDP neighbors

    Hello

    I was wondering if a configuration is as below

    Cisco switch ted (FAS 1/2)-(port 1) switch (int fas 3/1) linksys router (Port 2) - cisco switch Red

    When I do a neighbour of the cdp on one of the switches, I see another switch as a neighbor? If I say ted button, it will show a neighbor directly connected to FAS 3/1?

    Please notify

    Hello

    CDP packets must move seamlessly in each Cisco switch no, because they are sent to a specific multicast MAC address. Like other Cisco switches are not listening on this multicast MAC address, they flood the frame just like any other image to an unknown destination.

    CDP messages will pass not through routers (or better said, through routed ports) because they are not transported in IP packets and so they cannot be routed from one network to the other. The spread of CDP messages is always limited to the most a single broadcast domain.

    In addition, if the Linksys device in the Middle does not include CDP, you will not see it in the output of show cdp neighbors . Instead, you should see the TED and RED switches in CDP lists directly.

    Best regards
    Peter

  • MDS configuration for port channel

    I tried to put in place the new download FC port channel to a pair of 9124 s MDS, but as I don't know enough on the side MDS, I can't the link to come. Are there references available anywhere say you blow by blow exactly how to set up the side MDS of the channel of the port? Or maybe an example of configuration work?

    Thank you

    I don't think it's possible to configure the fabric of interconnections, FC switch mode that only VAN is based on those. The only mode of switch that is taken in charge and possible to configure is the local network Ethernet switching mode.

    I have configured the week last on a pair of 9124 s MDS and needed to activate the F port trunking and channeling Protocol feature by using this command

    "feature fport-channel-trunk.

    After that, I had to run SAN Port Channeling. Here's a snipit of my configuration:

    npiv functionality
    fport-channel-trunk feature

    interface port-channel 11
    active channel mode
    rate switchport dedicated mode

    interface fc1/1
    port-license purchase
    Channel-Group 11
    no downtime

    interface fc1/2
    port-license purchase
    Channel-Group 11
    no downtime

  • Port-channel problem between fabric Interconnect and vPC N7K

    Hi all

    I have a problem with the Port Uplink channel between fabric interconnect with N7K using vPC

    It's my network for the UCS deployment topology

    N7K I configured vPC for red link and green linkto the fabric Interconnect A I has configured the Port-Channel with Member is Port 1 and Port 2, uplink is red link. Interconnection fabric B, I have configured the Port-Channel with Member's Port 1 and Port 2, uplink's green link.

    The interface port-channel on N7K show is good, each port-channel upwards and have all members. But the fabric Interconnnect, when I see in the UCS Manager, the status of the Port-Channel on Fabic A and fabric B dysfunction not more info: no operational Member. Although all the link is a link to the top and I've got the status of the Port Channel is enabled in the UCS Manager. When I see the properties Port 1, Port to Port-Channel 2, I see the number of members status is: individual. This means channel port is not up and no member in this configuration. I want to using the port-channel load balance and more bandwidth for the uplink of 20Gig. I don't understand why?

    Please help me solve this problem, I have to send the screenshot of UCS Manager when I show the status of the Port-Channel and Port-member in port-channel to reach items.

    Can someone help me solve this problem, thanks a lot. References, please include elements for more details on the fault.

    Thank you

    Trung.

    Hello Nguyen,

    Since the two N7k please collect:

    SH cdp nei

    SH run membership in. X int

    SH sum port-chan

    Thank you

    Matthew

  • Determine the NIF port used by the HEART when it is configured in a port channel

    I recently saw an excellent video of live Cisco UCS troubleshooting performance that showed how to track traffic network within Cisco UCS. The speaker made a comment however, to determine that NIF is used by a high HEAT when port-channels are used between the FEX and FI there are different commands to run. You will need to determine the outcome of hash-load balancing. Unfortunately, he never entered what were these commands.

    Then when we have pinned port-channel instead of HIFs and NIFs veths, what commands will indicate which way is used?

    Matt,

    You can use this command:

    B (nxos) # sh port-channel - balance load< this="" will="" tell="" you="" the="" load="" balance="" method="">

    If you use source-dest-ip as in my case, you can use this command:

    B (nxos) # sh port-channel - the balance of the charge-transfer interface port-channel ID vlan ID x.x.x.x y.y.y.y dst - ip, src - ip and it will show you something like this:

    Lack of params will be substituted by 0.

    Algorithm to balance the load on the switch: source-dest-ip
    crc8_hash: 109 port id coming out: EthernetX / Y  < this="" is="" what="" you="" are="" looking="" for="">
    Param (s) used to balance the load to calculate:
    DST - ip: y.y.y.y
    SRC - ip: x.x.x.x
    DST - mac: 0000.0000.0000
    CBC - mac: 0000.0000.0000

    For the blade, depends on which the active vNIC is, for the FEX, depends on pinning, based on the server is located in the blade slot.  Strange servers go through odd links and same servers through the same ports.

    Remember to rate helpful answers.

    -Kenny

  • IOS NXOS VPC PORT channel

    Hello

    I have a pair of Nexus 5 K in an area of the VPC and few 2960's as members of the VPC, with a port to the domain channel.

    Topology is:

    5K 1 and 5 K 2 in the area of the VPC

    VPC 5 1 K and 5 K 2 to 2960

    2960 a gi0/1 and gi0/2 in 1 port channel

    Gi0/1 5 k 1, gi0/2 5 k 2

    I know what I'm going to ask can be completely against the purpose of the VPC, but I'm looking for a way to promote gi0/1 for traffic, rather than balancing on gi0/1 and gi0/2. The reaon for this is I want to take advantage of the absence of loop that provides mail ORDER, but would also like to have a link primary and secondary, as the majority of traffic should in fact go through 5K 1, rather than 5 K 2.

    Any suggestion is welcome.

    Thanks in advance

    Anthony

    Hi Anthony,.

    The Cisco NX - OS software load balance traffic across all operational interfaces in a portchannel by chopping the addresses in a numeric value that selects one of the links in the channel. Port channels provides default load balancing. It uses IP addresses, MAC addresses or layer port numbers 4 to select the port-channel-balancing link of the load. The port-channel load balancing uses the source or destination or port addresses, or both the source and ports or destination addresses.

    You can configure the mode of load balancing to be applied to all port channels that are configured on all of the device, or the specified modules. Each module configuration takes precedence over the configuration of load balancing for the entire device. You can configure a single mode of load balancing for the whole device, a different mode for specified

    modules and another mode of the other specified modules. You can not configure the port-channel load balancing method.

    You can configure the type of balancing algorithm used. You can choose the balancing algorithm that determines which Member port to select for the evacuation traffic by looking at the fields of the frame.

    Note: The mode of load balancing by default for layer 3 interfaces is the IP source and destination address, and the mode of the load balancing by default for non - IP interfaces is the source MAC address and destination.

    The configuration mode, you can try different method of load-balancing,

    port-channel - the balance of the load {dest-ip-port | dest-ip-port-vlan |}

    destination-ip-vlan. destination-mac | destination-port | source-dest-ip-port | source-dest-ip-port-vlan. source-dest-ip-vlan. source-dest-mac | source-dest-port | Source-ip-port | Source-ip-port-vlan. Source-ip-vlan. source-mac | source-port} [number of the module]

    To sum up: I can't tell which port would be chosen, it depends purely on image type you send with the combination method of load balancing.

    After you change you know also from the command which link takes the traffic.

    NEXUS2-SPAN # show the port-channel - the balance of the charge-transfer port-channel 71 src - ip 1.1.1.1 route dst - ip 2.2.2.2 VLANs 51 2 interface module

    Module 2: Missing params will be substituted by 0.

    Load balancing algorithm: src - dst ip-l4port

    RBH: port id out 0xb0: Ethernet8/8

    We can try also to rework the same NLB on the 2960 also. Is it purely depends on the algorithm of load balancing. Below is for 2960 balancing tweaking,

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/switches/LAN/catalyst2960/software/release/12.2_53_se/configuration/guide/swethchl.html

    Even after doing this that I wouldn't say 100 percent, he would choose a link.

    I hope this helps!

    Thank you

    Richard.

    * Rate if this is useful

  • FC Port-Channel does not

    Hello

    I need help, I'm setup CF port-channel between 9148 MDS and Cisco fabric Interconnect 6248 and the port-channel does not work. He said no operational members.

    For the MDS, see configuration below:

    NPIV #feature SW (config)

    SW (config) #feature fport-channel-trunk

    SW (config) #interface fc1/17-18

    SW(config-f) force Group-channel mode # 63

    SW(Config-if) F #switchport mode

    SW(Config-if) #switchport trunk-allowed vsan 1-2 (I have only vsan 1 and 2)

    SW (config) #no close

    SW (config) #interface 63 port channel

    SW(Config-if) F #switchport mode

    SW(config-f) #switchport trunk-allowed vsan 1-2

    SW (config) - #no close

    Note: the ports are assigned to vsan 2

    See the attached screenshots for interconnection fabric config

    On the fabric of interconnections switchport mode are defined E. What I have to change to F. If yes where can I change since the option is not there in the UCS Manager?

    have you added the VSANS on the UCSM as well?

    What Code are you runnig on the San Norhbound selector?

    You can be hitting

    https://Tools.Cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/ CSCty04686

  • Total for the port-channel when speed config speed 1000-nexus5548?

    Hello world.

    now I connect cisco 6509 and nexus 5548up using two link of 1000M and I want the two link port-Channel binding.

    5548up port 10GE port cisco 6509 is 1GE, I config speed 1000 in nexus5548 ethernet port, and I find

    the speed 1000 order auto config interface port-channel, so I would like to know the total speed in this channel port

    is 1000M and 2000M when port-channel speed config 1000? I appreciate your help!

    the topology like this:

    1000M

    --------------------------------------------

    6509 port-channel speed 1000M nexus5548UP

    ----------------------------------------------

    1000M

    Hi again

    The speed of the links and portchannel is 1000M but the bandwidth of the portchannel is 2000M

  • Configuration port-channel, DTP, disabling

    Hi all

    I had a problem on the day where I wanted to attach a pile of 3750 x 2 to the network, the core is a 6500.

    There was a link configured for the core of the 3750 he had the configuration necessary trunk with BPDUFILTER active

    at the end of the base he had the standard configuration of trunk. The link is on the rise and work.

    Went to get a second battery for the heart link. Decided that DTC must be turned off at the end of the SWITCHPORT NONEGOTIATE battery

    the normal chest on the port configuration on the port channel port joined. Then suddenly the newspapers went crazy and right now, I need

    Spanning tree went crazy and started blocking areas of the network to avoid loops. There is STDS running in the network

    I had similar errors to this % SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF

    I pulled the battery cables and all services affected later came back.

    I know that enable the BPDUFILTER option stops at the port to participate in STP.

    Please could someone confirm due to the incompatibility of the config on these ports it has this problem or is there something I missed here

    Thank you mnay

    The BPDU filter is the root of the problem.

    You can't have two active rising running without creating a loop, unless they run into a PaGP/LACP-EtherChannel configuration. By having one or two links running with a filter BPDU, spanning Protocol tree on the 6500 didn't know that a link had to be in a deadlock state and he was panicked when MAC addresses on the stack of 3750 began to stir between interfaces.

    3750 cross media - stack EtherChannel using LACP, so if you want the resilience of two connections without having to factor in the covering tree branches, it is a good idea to combine the two in a group of channels and have both the 3750 and 6500 treat them as a single logical connection.

    If you want to keep them separated, you will need to remove the filters BPDU these ports and leave spanning tree figure things out properly.

  • Fabric Port Channel

    Hello

    Once in production, when the addition of cables in a PortChannel from fabric between the IOM and a FI, first had to be re - ack frame? (so that we will have the chassis package downtime). Or rather, as is a Port-Channel cables are detected automatically, so that it is not necessary to re - ack, and so there is no downtime in all... one that is the correct statement?

    Thank you

    Hello

    Yes, it is possible to have cloth by fabric port channel (A / B) by within an instance of the UCS chassis.

    Option is available under

    Equipment > chassis > chassis X > connectivity strategy

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/unified_computing/UCS/SW/GUI/config/Guide/2.0/b_UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_0_chapter_01100.html#d106201e585a1635

    HTH

    Padma

  • UCS - san-port-channel on vpc

    Hello

    I hope someone can help with this,

    I have a Setup with 2 Nexus of 5548 connected via a link of vpc peers and a keepalive, these two nexus switch have a link of standard VPC to a 6500 upstream. It works fine,

    Then, there are several native FC connections of the 5548 to of 6248. I know that there is the possibility to configure the channel port of CF on the UCS 2.0 but it is possible to link 5548 CF interfaces in a port channel san through a vpc between the nexus of 5548.

    so, for example, I can port-channel which follows through a vpc or is a channel of port san, limited to the same nexus only switch ports.

    Fc1/31 & fc1/32 fabric sent to-> NX5K - 1 Port fc1/31 & NX5K - 2 Port fc1/32 (san port-channel 10 on a VPC)

    Fabric B fc1/31 & fc1/32 passed to-> NX5K - 1 Port fc1/32 & NXFK - 2 Port fc1/31 (san port-channel 11 on a VPC)

    Thank you

    Ray.

    It is not possible. VPC is the only Layer 2 ethernet port channel. Port channel San cannot be built through vpc

    Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

  • IPS Inline Mode Interface - you can use a port channel?

    Hello

    I am trying to determine if you have a 2-gig Layer 3 Port channel through a 4260 IPS appliance. See the attached diagram. Is this possible?

    The customer, I work with would prefer not to enter this cost equal to Port-Channel 1 gig of links (I don't think that there is a difference in performance...) However, I think that if they want the device inline, as the diagram shows - they will have to break the port-channel. Is this a correct assumption?

    Thank you

    Brad

    Asymmetric traffic will prevent the sensor works best, he is capable. There is a configuration that can be done to allow the detector deployed in an asymmetrical environment, BUT it can affect the ability of the sensor to detect attacks, allows through evasions which would have been prevented and will not affect general performance of the sensor.

    If running in unbalanced mode should be avoided if possible. BT in cases where it cannot then the sensor always allows with degraded functionality.

    Traffic spikes above what the sensor can manipulate at will cause ignored packets. There is no help for too much traffic.

    The relief you talk I guess is the bypass function. The bypass feature does not affect during the subscription of the sensor. The bypass feature will only kick if the analytical engine crashes due to a bug.

  • Setting port channel between UCS - FI and MDS 9124 (Mode F)

    Dear team,

    We tried to create the channel of port between UCS FI and MDS 9124

    But the port channel do not take action in mode F on MDS 9124

    FI is in host FC end Mode

    We have allowed FC uplink on FI trunking

    We have activated NPIV on MDS

    We have activated the MDS trunk

    FI and MDS in default VSAN

    To check that we have changed the way FI FC channels mode and switch port became active, but in E mode

    When we enabled CF trunking of uplink on the port mode FI channels and FC Switching became active in mode TE

    but in both cases above, showflogi database shows WWPN of SAN alone does not have the any fi.

    How to achieve this?

    Have read that no need to change the mode switching mode of CF swicthing and keep FC Endhost way

    SO how to channel ports with mode F MDS and FI (Display Mode as NProxy)

    What is it has nothing to do with the MDS NX - OS version? (https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2179129)

    If yes how to put as license for ports came with the camera and we don't have any CAP/PAK or license file as she came

    with license

    Also, we saw 2 files available for download (m9100-s2ek9-kickstart - mz.5.2.8 .bin and m9100-s2ek9 - mz.5.2.8 .bin b b) to use

    Thanks and greetings

    Jose

    Hi Jo Bo.

    What version of the software if your MDS race?

    On your UCS do connect nxos and show ficelleStringString ficelleT inteface and find the mac address.

    It is possible that you could be hitting the bug below. If this is the case, you may need to update the firmware on your MDS.

    Add MAC YES '002a6a', '8c604f', '00defb' for 5 k/UCS-FI

    http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId= CSCty04686

    Symptom:

    Link change cannot connect any other Nexus or other Cisco Switch in mode VAN with a port channel F.   Question can be viewed in older versions of 5.1

    5.1.3.N1.1a

    but not later

    5.1.3.N2.1c

    Release. Question is also found in

    5.2 (1) N1 (1)

    and

    6.0 (2) N1 (1)

    and later versions.

    Conditions:

    Nexus configured for the link SAN PortChannels or NPIV Nexus mode connected to the UCS via regular F port channel where UCS VAN VAN edge mode switch: YES switch manufactured FI or another Cisco UCS Port WWN: xx:xx:00:2 has: 6a: xx:xx:xx or xx:xx:8 c: 60:4f:xx:xx:xx

    Workaround solution:

    Turn-off on Nexus 5 k TF-port question link mode does not happen with standard F-PORT SAN to remove Portchannel config

    Other Description of the problem:

    To check question collect please see the flogi-event history internal errors whenever the port is attempted OLS, AMENDMENTS, PBA counters will increment. This can be determined via the following output, view port internal info to see all the internal-historic port of error events

  • port channels

    I'm looking on the port channels configured on the FI. And that's all. port channel 21 is (eth 1/27-20) which is connected to the nexus 7000

    so, what are the others?

    (nxos) # sh port-channel summary

    Flags: D - low P - Up in the port-channel (members)

    I - individual H - standby (LACP only)

    s suspended r - Module-removal

    S - Dial R - routed

    U - up (port-channel)

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Group-Type Port Protocol Ports members

    Channel

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    21 Po21 (SU) Eth LACP Eth1/17 (P) Eth1/18 (P) Eth1/19 (P)

    Eth1/20 (P)

    1286 Po1286 (SU) Eth NO Eth2/1/9 (P) Eth2/1/10 (P) Eth2/1/11 (P)

    Eth2/1/12 (P)

    1293 Po1293 (SU) Eth NO Eth1/1/9 (P) Eth1/1/10 (P) Eth1/1/11 (P)

    Eth1/1/12 (P)

    1298 Po1298 (SU) Eth NO Eth1/1/5 (P) Eth1/1/6 (P) Eth1/1/7 (P)

    Eth1/1/8 (P)

    1300 Po1300 (SU) Eth NO Eth2/1/5 (P) Eth2/1/6 (P) Eth2/1/7 (P)

    Eth2/1/8 (P)

    1306 Po1306 (SU) Eth NO Eth1/1/17 (P) Eth1/1/18 (P) Eth1/1/19 (P)

    Eth1/1/20 (P)

    1308 Po1308 (SU) Eth NO Eth2/1/17 (P) Eth2/1/18 (P) Eth2/1/19 (P)

    Eth2/1/20 (P)

    1311 Po1311 (SU) Eth NO Eth2/1/13 (P) Eth2-1-14 (P) Eth2/1/15 (P)

    Eth2/1/16 (P)

    1312 Po1312 (SU) Eth NO Eth1/1/13 (P) 1/Eth1/14 (P) 1/Eth1/15 (P)

    Eth1/1/16 (P)

    1315 Po1315 (SU) Eth NO Eth2/1/21 (P) Eth2/1/23 (P)

    1317 Po1317 (SU) Eth NO Eth1/1/21 (P) Eth1/1/23 (P)

    Tony,

    Port channels is those created implicitly by having the material of generation 2 (220 x, VIC 1240/80 and 62xx)

    These PC cannot be destroyed and cannot be seen through NXOS (UCSM-GUI will not display the)< thanks="" to="" my="" colleague="" jeff="">

    There is another discussion in this same forum this morning:

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/4013409#4013409

    I hope this helps

    -Kenny

Maybe you are looking for