Shared in Teststand variable: error-17500

Similar Questions

• TestStand GUI (TestExec.exe) indicates random error-17500 (TestStand SeqEdit R6025-pure virtual call)

  Using Labview 2009 and TestStand 4.1, I developed a test solution.

  Found that I get the intermittent error-17500 appear when running my movie file using the TestExec.exe (simple UI of TestStand), who abandons then stable.

  I then used the TestStand sequence editor to run my seq file and even once, I get an intermittent failure, but this time he points out:

  Microsoft C++ Runtime Library Error R6025 - virtual call pure - seqedit.exe

  Seems that this must be a bug in TestStand/Labview.

  Someone at - he never encountered this? Very annoying bug that it stops at our production line.

  Thank you

  Thanks for your reply.

  The problem disappeared when I changed my Labview in engine Labview TestStand adapter back to the Labview developer.

  I had to install the Labview license on this computer to use the license developer, but at least this got rid of the problem.

  I was expecting the Labview engine or TestStand, is more stable than that.

• Hidden properties and PropFlag_Hidden gives - failed [Code of error-17500] Popup

  We use a User Interface LV (8.5) TS (4.0), which is a modified version of the Interface of LabVIEW Basic comes with TestStand.  Our user interface is pretty basic; It allows the selection and execution of the sup within these sequences sequences and test sequences.

  Our selection of void sequence control is a Combobox of sequences which is filled automatically by TestStand, for sub sequences when a test sequence is selected by the user.

  Our problem is this: our test sequences have a number of sequences of void, which some we want the user to be able to choose, through our Combobox sequence, and others who must be visible to the user.  We use PropFlags_Hidden flag staggered with the Options of Station-> view hidden properties (disabled) to remove sequences hidden from the Combobox of sequence.  Unfortunately, when the user selects one of the selectable sup sequences, TestStand displays a popup with the text 'Operation impossible [Code of error-17500]'.  If we choose OK on the popup, we can run the sequence of select sub without problem.

  If we set the Options of Station-> display hidden properties selected, all the Sub sequences that are supposed to be hidden appear in our Combobox sequence (as you know) and we get not the popup has failed when you select one of our sub slectable sequences.

  I wonder if anyone has seen this before and can offer advice.

  Thanks for reading

  Steve B

  Hi Sylvie

  Thanks for your reply.  Yes, sorry I have not to explain my problem very well.  Luckily we found the cause and have a solution in place.

  It seems, if you have the file of unique sequence with several sequences it contains (some others not hidden), no hidden sequences must appear above the sequences hidden in the list of sequences.  The reclassification can be done in the editor of sequence or programmatically through the API.

  Thanks again

  Steve

• Global variables or shared unique process variables?

  Normal
  0
  21

  fake
  fake
  fake

  MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

  / * Style definitions * /.
  table. MsoNormalTable
  {mso-style-name: "Table Normal";}
  MSO-knew-rowband-size: 0;
  MSO-knew-colband-size: 0;
  MSO-style - noshow:yes;
  "mso-style-parent:" ";" "
  MSO-padding-alt: 0 cm 0 cm 5.4pt 5.4pt;
  MSO-para-margin: 0 cm;
  MSO-para-margin-bottom: .0001pt;
  MSO-pagination: widow-orphan;
  do-size: 10.0pt;
  do-family: "Times New Roman";
  MSO-ansi-language: #0400;
  mso-fareast-language: #0400;
  mso-bidi-language: #0400 ;}

  Given that the
  introduction of shared variables, whenever I needed a global variable, I have
  use shared unique process variables. But I started now return to
  using the old global variable because I think that there are some significant drawbacks
  to the single shared variable. Here is the ability to search for
  case of variables and also the ability to view or change the value of
  the variable (OK, we have the variable Manager, but I found slow and)
  unstable). My question is, are there reasons to use the new single
  process variable actions on old global variables?

  Dear Terje,

  As you use only the variables on a single system. There is no advantage to the use of unique process shared on Globals variables.

  Infact a global variable uses a little less processing power that a global variable as the implementation of a shared variable single-pocess effect is a global variable with the timestamp feature.
  If you use a shared variable single process, if you don't need the timestamp feature, then disable it to use less processing power.

• Shared data varying variable published network write error

  In my project in real time, on the VI host running on my Windows PC, I try to write in a number of published network shared variables.  All these write operations are successful (which means that I can read them on the RT target, then a cRIO-9012), except for these shared variables network-published with data type defined as Variant.  I'm not sure what is causing the problem.

  I take the table of clusters shown here...

  

  .. .and going through one "in Variant' VI and then subsequently in writing to the shared variable (data type: Variant).  Diagnosis of the failure of the VI in real-time to read the data, I found that variable writing shared on the host VI produced the following error:

  Error - 2147467259 appeared to Variable shared in the PC host TTS CTRL.vi

  Possible reasons:

  LabVIEW: Unspecified error (Hex 0x80004005).
  =========================
  System OR Configuration: Various operating default (Hex 0x80004005).

  This error or warning occurred when writing the following shared Variable:
  Shared \\My Computer\Network Variables\TC trust Array Group - network
  Shared \\128.144.90.143\Network Variables\TC trust Array Group - network

  .. where 128.144.90.143 is the IP address of the PC.

  Any thoughts?

  Sean

  I saw this post, and when I found myself with no other option, I have redefined the variables in question to the string data type and replaced all the "to variant" and "given Variant of ' functions with functions 'Flatten channel' and"The string Unflatten"respectively.  Initially, it did not work - functions "Chain Unflatten" would produce error 74, until I realized that the "data includes array or string of size? (T)"input on each 'string Unflatten" function must be set to FALSE. Wiring a constant false for each instance of "Unflatten to the string" seems to have corrected the problem.

  I have still no idea why wouldn t Variant.  Shared variables Editor allows to define a variant data type, so I guess it's supposed to?

  Sean

• Sharing of Variable error-1950679023 in LabVIEW 8.6.1

  Hello

  Is anyone else having problems with this error after installing LabVIEW 8.6.1?

  Programs using variables shared that I wrote (and worked), just in older versions don't seem to work.

  Kind regards

  Sarah

  Hi Sarah,.

  Good afternoon and I hope that your well today.

  Sorry for the delay...

  I've did some more research and found that there is a patch for LabVIEW 8.6.1 and variable - could this be the cause of your faceing...

  Link: http://joule.ni.com/nidu/cds/view/p/lang/en/id/1255

  "This is an update to only LabVIEW 8.6.1 solve a problem when the variable path related is incorrect after variable deployment."

  You don't seem to have proved the issue about outside of your code - I go to the update being installed and not the goal of the solution to reproduce your problem.

  Finally, please run - but do not uninstall! the attached MSIBlast tool. It will list all the packages OR (Packages MSI) installed on the machine. Please note that the list should include,

  Client Variable nor to RT + versions Supprt

  Support for versions + OR motor Variable

  Variable Manager OR

  ... to name a few.

  I would be interested to know if they appear in the list,

  Hope this helps,

• Deploy the shared target rt variable fails (crio-9073)

  I use a cRIO 9073 with LabVIEW 8.6. I have some variable published to my PC network I want the cRIO host read. However when I try to deploy the variables on the cRIO, I get the following error:

  Initializing...
  Calculating dependencies...
  The checking for conflicts. This may take some time...
  Prepare the items for download. This may take some time...
  Variables variables.lvlib\\129.186.159.84\robot robot deployment deployment has failed (error:-2147220721, (Hex 0x8004030F) the configuration database cannot be opened, perhaps because of corruption.) Note: the steps that you did which led to this error and contact technical support).
  Completed with errors of deployment

  I tried to reinstall the software on the cRIO, which includes the network Variable 1.5.0 engine and tried hosting variables on the cRIO. I still get this error.

  Everyone knows about this problem? What should I do to use variables shared on the 9073?

  I tried stubborn MAX, who did not work. Then I reformatted the cRIO and the problem is solved.

• Getting a shared list of variable references

  I'm working on a project of data acquisition that will use AES. This is really my first foray in EVS, and I hit a stumbling block.

  I'll use a loop for distributing the waveforms acquired at their appropriate variables (DAQmx read Nsamples, Nchannels, 1 d of DBL waveforms, each waveform of the GET it's own variable.) "Get Shared Variable List" returns a list of variable names, but the Variable 'write' requires a reference to a variable. How can I go from one to the other?

  I've posted an excerpt of what I have so far.

  -Ian

  It seems that you're dealing with two categories of variables.  The origin of the palette of DSC function and returns what looks like an array of labels of DSC.

  The purple thread says it's a network variable (tag BV), but the hook upwards a property to that node and the class is SharedVariable IO.

  Your other function leaves the Variable Communication/Shared Data palette and just says it is a variable.

  I'm not sure it would work as I have no way to test it.  But if you use the node name property of the SDC tag and use it to open a reference to a shared variable, the son all connect without errors.

  

• TestStand database error - error converting data from nchar int type.

  Hello

  I used SQL standards database stored procedure options to store records of my test and I added the generated tables and stored procedures in a database and it seems to work OK in this form. However when I change the UUT_Results table to include a new column that contains the value of the primary key of another table in the database that I meet problems.

  I run a query that returns the primary key value (integer) for a given series number and stores the result as a global station (number format). The correct value is stored in the variable, but when I try to use this value in the stored procedure I get an error like below:

  An error occurred calling "LogResults" in "ITSDBLog" of "ZNIUGOL TestStand database logging"
  An error has occurred by executing a statement.
  Schema: SQL Server Stored Proc (NOR)
  Statement: UUT_RESULT.
  Description: Error converting data from nchar int type.
  Number:-2147217913
  NativeError: 8114
  SQLState: 22018
  Reported by: provider Microsoft OLE DB for SQL Server

  Source: TSDBLog

  My SQL statement for creating the table and the procedure for UUT_results are below:

  ~
  CREATE TABLE UUT_RESULT)
  Uniqueidentifier PRIMARY KEY ID,
  BoardDetailID int,
  STATION_ID varchar (255),
  BATCH_SERIAL_NUMBER varchar (255),
  TEST_SOCKET_INDEX int,
  UUT_SERIAL_NUMBER varchar (255),
  USER_LOGIN_NAME varchar (255),
  START_DATE_TIME is datetime,
  EXECUTION_TIME float,
  UUT_STATUS varchar (32),
  UUT_ERROR_CODE int,
  UUT_ERROR_MESSAGE varchar (255)
  CONSTRAINT UUT_RESULT_FK FOREIGN KEY (BoardDetailID) made REFERENCE BoardDetails)

  ~
  CREATE PROCEDURE InsertUUTRESULT
  @pID uniqueidentifier,
  @pBoardDetailID int,
  @pSTATION_ID varchar (255),
  @pBATCH_SERIAL_NUMBER varchar (255),
  @pTEST_SOCKET_INDEX int,
  @pUUT_SERIAL_NUMBER varchar (255),
  @pUSER_LOGIN_NAME varchar (255),
  DateTime @pSTART_DATE_TIME.
  float of @pEXECUTION_TIME.
  @pUUT_STATUS varchar (32),
  @pUUT_ERROR_CODE int,
  @pUUT_ERROR_MESSAGE varchar (255)
  AS
  INSERT INTO UUT_RESULT (ID, BoardDetailID, STATION_ID, BATCH_SERIAL_NUMBER, TEST_SOCKET_INDEX, UUT_SERIAL_NUMBER, USER_LOGIN_NAME, START_DATE_TIME, EXECUTION_TIME, UUT_STATUS, UUT_ERROR_CODE, UUT_ERROR_MESSAGE)
  VALUES)
  @pID,
  @pBoardDetailID,
  @pSTATION_ID,.
  @pBATCH_SERIAL_NUMBER,.
  @pTEST_SOCKET_INDEX,.
  @pUUT_SERIAL_NUMBER,.
  @pUSER_LOGIN_NAME,.
  @pSTART_DATE_TIME,.
  @pEXECUTION_TIME,.
  @pUUT_STATUS,.
  @pUUT_ERROR_CODE,.
  @pUUT_ERROR_MESSAGE)

  Any help would be appreciated,

  Thank you

  Stuart

  Stuart-

  What is the expression you are evaluating and the data type of the parameter that you defined in the Options database dialog box for the schema that you connect to data with?

• Shared STM vs variable

  From what I saw on the forum so far, it seems to me that, compared to a shared variable, STM is better with different data and larger size data type. The only thing that makes the slightly better shared variable that the STM is to be a little more simple.  If this is the case, why use a variable shared at all?  Are there applications where the shared variable is much better than the STM?

  We used the variables shared/datasocketfor for 5 years and they work well. In the simplest form, they are extremely easy to use. I strongly recommend wrapping it in a logic to give you the ability to detect the connection state and to reestablish the connection if it is lost (simple implementation will raise an error and not reconnect)

  The biggest risk in using this Protocol is that NEITHER has all the cards. You have no guarantee that they will not introduce critical bugs in the next update or eliminate entirely (aka datasocket). In addition, when you identify obscure bugs/features with the Protocol, NOR will be adapted, but, chances are, you will not be able to get a concrete timetable on the fix. It is not very cool if it's the backbone of your system.

  Because of the risks above, I started studying using TCP/IP primitives to make the set of our communication network. I have a theory that they are very stable and little evolutionary (except maybe for ipv6). Can someone save me from this?

• How a shared single process variable be FIFO and single element?

  How a variable shared unique process can we both FIFO and the only element at the same time?

  I read the NOR recommended for communication between a loop deterministic and non-deterministic loop.  He is said to use SVariable ingle-process Shared FIFO and single element.  OK I can't have something... because in my mind these two things must be mutually exclusive.  How do you have a single item 1?

  

  What 'RT FIFO activé' means, that when you use the variables shared in a timed loop it actually is written to a RT FIFO created automatically.

  The key here is that generally shared variables are shared resources and can add jitter to deterministic tasks if another loop uses the variable at the same time as your loop of deterministic.

  So here's the takeaway, when shared with RT FIFO active Variables using:

  • Normal loops read and write the shared variable in the same way as they always do.
  
  
  • Call loops read and write a FIFO RT rather
  
  
  • The data is automatically passed between the RT FIFOs and shared in a nondeterministic loop variable

  RT FIFOs exist because their architecture referred to as non-blocking so that when the timed loop trying to access it is guaranteed immediate access to a memory space.

  Does that answer your question?

• TestStand deployment error - error: unable to locate all the screws saved subVIs because it lacks a Subvi

  Hello

  I am a systems and software engineer based in Vancouver. I developed a test system automated using 2013 LabVIEW and TestStand 2013 with custom operator interface.
  I encountered problem 'lack screw' which is kind of weird because I went to analyze the sequence for the TestStand Deployment Utility and TestStand sequence editor > files broadcast tab.
  But when I tried to build the installer and reach the point ' called distribution screw, it always throws an error saying "an error occurred trying to read the error of the screw, possible because the screws are not saved in the latest version of LabVIEW. Do you want to save any changes now? ". I tried both (that is to say Yes and no) for this option, but it has not solved the problem.

  This is part of the original error message displayed in the TestStand deployment utility:
  " ***************************
  Then the treatment live...
  Error: Cannot locate all the subVIs screws saved because a Subvi is missing or the VI is not registered in the last version of LabVIEW.
  The chain of calls to missing screws:
  1 - ATE_AccelerometerTest.vi
  2 - CreateAndMergeErrors.vi (missing)
  3 - LogControl_CheckForErrorSendUpdates.vi (missing)"

  All screw missing come from userlib.

  Actions performed:
  -File of sequence analyzed by using the TestStand Deployment Utility and TestStand sequence editor
  -Checked "search directories" include all the necessary files/dependencies.
  -Mass to compile the directory of the missing screws
  -Added all the necessary files and folders in the workspace file.

  The result is always the same function according to the actions performed.

  Debugging last I did earlier, is that I tried to find the sequence and steps missing screws as shown above (for example ATE_AccelerometerTest.vi)
  and I discovered that the measure appears to be an empty action step. This would be possible even if it has already passed the analysis?

  Other considerations include:

  I'm using sp1 2013 LabVIEW and TestStand 2013. We tried the building three 3 computers and we only managed once to a freshly installed comptuer.

  Hoping to hear from you soon.

  Kind regards

  Michael Panganiban
  Engineering systems and software
  www.Synovus.ca
  [email protected]

  Hi all

  We were able to solve the problem. First of all to note is that the release notes in 2013 TestStand is obsolete and we confirmed engineer OR Austin TestStand 2013 works very well with LabVIEW 2013 SP1.

  Second, we played option deployment TestStand that solved the problem. Attached are the pictures.

  We have activated just the 'delete unused Components VI'. It could be one of the libraries (lvlib) we have included in the compilation, but we've not thought of it again because we have checked that all the screws are working. It could also be something else that I think is very hard to find from information. However, if someone had the same problem, this could be useful.

  Again, we return to using 2013 TestStand and LabVIEW 2013 SP1.

  I appreciate all comments and feedbacks. Otherwise, you can close this request for assistance.

  Thank you.

  Kind regards

  Michael Panganiban

  Engineering systems and software

• TestStand 2013 error 80004005

  For some reason any, whenever I try to run the sequence editor I get a "system-level Exception" followed by "creating an instance of the COM CLSID {(B2794EF6-C0B6-11d) - 939 C-0020AF68E893 component witch} IClassFactory failed due to the following error: 80004005"

  I followed the patches published, including deleting stationglobals.ini, running 'Selector of Version' etc almost nothing works. The exception is that, after a PC restart, it will work, but very slowly; the sequence editor closing and restarting it brings error 80004005.

  I also tried to uninstall and re - install TestStand as well as complete re-installtion of 2014 DS.

  Short of re-formatting my hard drive and to go back I don't know what I can do.

  Any suggestions would be most welcome.

  Keith

  
  

• error-17500 when you use the version selector and the toolboxinstaller.exe file not found since the deployment of ts3.5

  Whenever I run the version selector to switch between ts4.2 and 3.5, it displays the error message above and gives also advice how to fix for a version of visual studio, I do not have (I am using 2003). As well as this when I start the deployment of TS3.5 engine I get error message with toolboxinstaller.exe system.io.filenotfound. I know that they are then tried to repair/reinstall nothing works, any help would be greatly appreciated thanks

  Hi Elizabeth,.

  The message below is similar to the message that you receive (note that this message relates to Visual Studio 2005, you could relate to Visual Studio 2003):

  

  This is a known issue with Version TestStand selector and was reported to R & D (#171620). The picker Version TestStand assumes that when Visual Studio is installed on the machine, that Visual C++ has also been installed. It tries to write in Visual C++ specific files that do not exist if Visual C++ is not installed.

  This error does not mean that something is not necessarily, it is more a message that the file cannot be written in successfully. You should be able to continue to launch TestStand successfully without problem.

  On the deployment utility, I suppose that the two issues are related, however, it would be much easier to say for certain that the error you receive won't cause problems if you post a screenshot of the error. You can do it.

  Thank you!

• TestStand deployment error Code 1055 when using LabVIEW storage VIs

  After a few days of playing with TestStand deployment. I have final stalked the VI which was the origin of this error.

  He was using the LabVIEW storage screw to save data in a TDM file.

  My work around at the moment is to use a Wrapper VI and call this VI by reference.

  In this way the deployment TestStand cannot detect the Sie of storage.

  I'm using LabVIEW 8.6.1 and TestStand 4.1.1 does anyone know if this issue was address TestStand 4.2?

  It seems that the upgrade can be worth it.

  Simon,

  After investigating the matter further, I found that we had already encountered this bug. It has been fixed in 4.2 TestStand and LabVIEW 2009 I tested your files with 4.2 TestStand, LabVIEW 2009 and everything built successfully without any hiccups on the way.