Simultaneous connections in ASA

Similar Questions

• Allow unlimited simultaneous connections

  We have ASA, run 8.0 (5).  We set up a user account for several people in the same Department to connect to the Cisco VPN client.  Is there a way to allow connections unlimited competitor?   Advise you to use a single account for multiple people in the same Department?  We have a single account for all sellers 'sales', 'engineer' for all engineers account, one account 'technical support' for all support staff.

  Thank you.

  Hello

  If you have a VPN user Let's say cisco:

  attributes username cisco

  VPN - connections?

  <0-2147483647>Maximum number of simultaneous connections allowed

  I don't think you use the same account for many people, because if you need track someone down, you can't (because many people share the account).

  Federico.

• Maximum number of simultaneous connections error

  Hello!

  After a year of using my BB app, some users have reported to me that following error occurred yesterday:

  net.rim.protocol.iplayer.device.IOException: reach Maximum simultaneous connections to net.rim.protocol.iplayer.queue.IPLayerReceivingQueueManager.puttinQueue(IPLayerReceivingQueueManager.java:171) to net.rim.protocol.iplayer.thread.ListenForClientsPackets.run(ListenForClientsPackets.java:116)

  I searched, but it seems rare to find this error. Can someone tell me what this acutally?

  Thank you!

  Does that help?

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/T5/Java-development/maximum-number-of-simultaneous-connections/t...

• Physical connectivity of ASA AIP - SSM

  How the physical connectivity of ASA AIP - SSM should be in the case of inline interface mode of inspection for all interfaces of the firewall. ?

  Rgds.

  Assuming that 'interface_policy' has "inline ips" in the policy, then yes your configuration is correct.

  Keep in mind that 'GigabitEthernet0/1' being assigned to vs0 is the background interface of basket of the MSS itself and should not be confused with the external interface GigabitEthernet0/1 of the SAA.

  As for using several virtual probes, it is a personal choice.

  When you use an ASA with just a single context, then usually a single virtual sensor is sufficient. It's only when you want to follow for traffic coming from firewall interfaces (or different classes of traffic) If you want to use several different virtual devices.

  However, when you use an ASA with multiple security contexts, then it is usually a good idea to go and use a virtual sensor separate from the context of the ASA.

  If you choose to use several virtual devices, you must understand that the background basket interface GigabitEthernet0/1 are only awarded to only 1 virtual sensors.

  Here is an explanation of how the other virtual sensors would get traffic:

  When packets are sent to DFS for monitoring ASA, ASA includes a special header in each packet. Special information such as the framework of the SAA whence the package, the real and NAT/PAT package addresses, and a few other things. An important field of this header is for the virtual sensor. He tells the SSM which virtual sensor must monitor this package.

  When the ASA is configured without using the names of virtual sensor, this is a virtual sensor in the package header field is blank. If the SSM sees a package with the field left blank it will check the DFS configuration to see which virtual sensor GigabitEthernet0/1 of the SSM has been assigned and that sends the packets to the virtual sensor.

  If ASA has been configured to send the packet to a specific virtual sensor (be it by adding the name of virtual sensor at the end of the "inline ips" entered configuration or by using the configuration entries "allocate ips" in the context of system configuration) then the ASA will include the virtual sensor in the header of the packet. The SSM will read in this area, and instead to send the virtual sensor where Gig0/1 is assigned, it will rather send to virtual sensor specified in the header of the packet.

  Indeed, it overrides the assignment Gig0/1 and will lead to what ever virtual sensor has been specified by the configuration of the SAA.

• Simultaneous connections to the VPN concentrator

  Hello

  The documents indicate that the "concurrent connections" applies for a user unique "in-house".

  I set up a group of users who use RADIUS as an authentication method. Wondered if the simultaneous connection can be applied as well.

  SO what I'm trying to do here, is to let the user to authenticate via RADIUS. I want to restrict only 1 session / username at the same time.

  Any ideas?

  If you can't do, what are the available workaround solutions?

  JEM,

  Correction,

  If you have set up a simultaneous connection "1" group, then all users in the group will be able to connect (1 simultaneous connection by UID).

  Kind regards

  ~ JG

• No Internet connectivity with ASA 5505 VPN remote access

  Hello

  I configured ASA 5505 for remote access VPN to allow a remote user to connect to the Remote LAN officce. VPN works well, users can access Office Resource of LAN with sahred etc., but once they have connected to the VPN, they are unable to browse the internet?

  Internet navigation stop working as soon as their customer VPN connect with ASA 5505 t, once they are disconnected from VPN, once again they can browse the internet.

  Not ASA 5505 blocking browsing the internet for users of VPN? Is there anything else that I need congfure to ensure that VPN users can browse the internet?

  I have to configure Split Tunnleing, NATing or routing for VPN users? or something else.

  Thank you very much for you help.

  Concerning

  Salman

  Salman

  What you run into is a default behavior of the ASA in which she will not route traffic back on the same interface on which he arrived. So if the VPN traffic arrived on the external interface the ASA does not want to send back on the external interface for Internet access.

  You have at least 2 options:

  -You can configure split tunneling, as you mention, and this would surf the Internet to continue during the use of VPN.

  -You can set an option on the ASA to allow traffic back on the same interface (this is sometimes called crossed). Use the command

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  HTH

  Rick

• Applications of multiple simultaneous connection with invalid password saturates the UDP ports and can lower the infrastructure of database 11g.

  Problem statement:

  
  

  Multiple simultaneous connection requests with invalid password saturates the UDP ports and can bring down the 11 GR 2 (11.2.0.4) database infrastructure.

  
  

  When the API try to put applications that is not able to connect and DB is still suspended as long and we restarted to solve the problem.

  
  

  So, I'm curious to know if a fix is available for this problem without having to restart the database.
  

  Multiple simultaneous connection requests with an invalid password

  Have you tried to use the password?

  can lower the 11 GR 2 (11.2.0.4) database infrastructure.

  I have to say that I am skeptical about this claim. I didn't know the database or the listener down due to attempts to connect not valid. Can you give us an error message or two confirming this?

  The right course of action is to use the correct password in the application.

  See you soon,.
  Brian

• Multiple simultaneous connections to a secure area with the same id/password user

  I was wondering if someone can answer this.

  We are creating a secure member area - there will be 3 area secure, air-conditioned and equipped with identical conent - a (one-time) 3 day trial, monthly subscription (recurring) and annual subscription (recurring).

  The user logs in the generic secure area.

  At this point, we can have multiple simultaneous connections with the same credentials in the secure area user - I was expecting it to be like the administration area where you get hunted if someone else logs into your account.

  Is there a way to limit the number of simultaneous connections with the same ID and password to a secure area (generic)?

  See you soon

  Pat

  This is actually a bug that they re not for awhile. If you connect to another place he should expel you from the other source of security.

• How determine a maximum simultaneous connection an oracle database can handl

  How to determine the maximum simultaneous connections that can manage an oracle database
  for example how to calculate maximum simultaneous connections to the database server
  with 40 GB of ram and 4 cpu.
  
  Published by: mankrit on March 11, 2011 13:51

  With shared server, you have the following resources imprint.

  You need one or more dispatcher processes. They will be processes that deal with the real client connections. Each such process will be a physical process on Linux/Unix, or a thread on Windows.

  You need one or more shared server processes. They will be the process that the service of the customer requests. A shared server process can only service application for a single client at a time. But during his life, he can serve many different customers. Each such process will be a physical process on Linux/Unix, or a thread on Windows.

  You must keep state data (called UGA or User Global Area) for each client connection. With a dedicated server, the UGA resides inside the memory of the server process. Shared server cannot have the UGA but they need to deal with a number of different clients over a lifetime and so a number of different UGAs.

  In addition, 1 shared server can process with your 1st request SQL (and the need to use UGA your connection), and when you run your 2nd SQL a few minutes later, shared 5 server needs to use your UGA.

  So the UGA must be shared - and this is why it is stored in the SGA of the Oracle instance.

  And this is in short the resource footprint, you need for shared servers.

  Keep in mind that a shared server can only service application for a single client at a time. A customer who has a complex query will be shared care for awhile and keep him from answering other customers. It would be ' + selfish + "customer - and such a client must use its own dedicated instead server connection instead. Generally - OLTP queries are ideal for shared servers (because they lack the length) and type OLAP applications are best for dedicated servers (because these are complex and slow to do).

  If you want more details on this point - there are many sources available. I suggest you first to the Oracle documentation through (http://tahiti.oracle.com), front of Googling the web for resources.

• Is it possible to simultaneously connect two keyboards of blue-tooth?

  I wouldn't actually use them simultaneously, but I would like to have both available.  I have my music bluetooth connected to my mac with display downstairs and upstairs.  I had to keep the keyboard down.  It would be nice to have a floor to control music as well as downstairs for normal purposes.

  Yes, you should be able to.  They each have their own unique identifier.

  NOTE: Bluetooth is short-range.  30' without walls in the way if the Mac Bluetooth antenna is correctly aligned on the Bluetooth device.  So try it before you buy any additional hardware.

• TCP ip has reached the limit of security imposed on the number of tcp simultaneous connect

  Idle process original title: System, create tcp/ip connections to achieve maximum attempts allowed on win xp
  Continue to event viewer showing warning saying tcp/ip has reached the limit of security imposed on the number of tcp connect attempts simultaneous and system idle process, that's what causes this error.  To many connections 127.0.0.1:6999 127.0.0.1:4426 time_wait

  127.0.0.1:4427 TIME_WAIT
  etc etc etc.

  Hello

  Thanks for asking! If I have understood correctly, you receive tcp ip error message has reached the security limit imposed on the number of simultaneous tcp connect in Event Viewer. I suggest you follow the troubleshooting steps to check if this may help.

  1. don't you make changes on the computer before the show?
  2. when exactly do you face the question?
  3. what anti-virus is installed on the computer?

  Method 1:
  It is a warning that a malicious program or a virus can be run on the system. You can run a Microsoft security scanner to make sure that the computer is free from virus infection:
  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx
  WARNING:
  If you run the antivirus program that is infected by the virus scan will get deleted. Therefore, reinstall the program. Also if the files and folders are affected by the virus, while they might even get deleted

  
  Method 2:
  Check the behavior by starting the computer in a clean boot state. How to configure Windows XP to start in a "clean boot" State
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/310353
  Note: When the diagnosis is complete do not forget to reset the computer to a normal startup. Follow step 7 in the above article.

  Method 3:
  Please close some of the connections (some types of downloads can use multiple connections).

  Check out the link:
  http://www.Microsoft.com/technet/support/ee/transform.aspx?ProdName=Windows+operating+system&ProdVer=5.2&EvtID=4226&EvtSrc=Tcpip&lcid=1033

  Please follow these recommended steps, review the additional information provided and post if you still experience the problem. I'd be happy to help you more

• Internet VERY slow connection on SD2008 connected to ASA 5505

  I recently bought a SD2008 (2008/11/28) to replace an older Linksys 10/100 switch for my home network. This switch connects to an ASA 5505 to go to the internet. I have improved since most of my pc have 10/100/1000 and the new NAS I purchased also connects to 1000 so I wanted to speed internally.

  The cries of network domestic now

  BUT...

  Get out to the internet has now slowed to crawl of a lily "slowski". I used to get 16-18Mbps using the 10/100 switch. Now, I'm lucky to get 1 MB/s dl speed.

  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

  Too bad. I found the answer on a completely different thread that actually worked. I've linked the SD2008 to the ASA 5505 with a crossover cable, set the port speed/duplex AUTO/AUTO, restarted the ASA, and everything was back to normal.

  So much for the detection of cut MDI/MDI-X auto...

  Hope this helps someone else.

• Internet Auth users simultaneous connections by Cisco WLC 5508?

  Hello

  We have 2 WLC5508 (7.2.111.3) with multiple SSID.

  One of them is configured as Passthrough with an external boot server. Works very well.

  Now, we want to use the "failure of MAC filtering on.

  If the client MAC address is configured under filtering MAC on the WLC, authentication is done without WebAuth.

  If the MAC address is not known, the client will be redirect to the external WebAuth server for authentication.

  To preserve the functionality of relay for the user, we have hard coded a username & password in the start page.

  Thus, each customer WebAuth uses the same user name & password for authentication against the WLC.

  Strategies of user login is set to unlimited.

  So far so good, it seems to work, but I've read that the controllers of Cisco 5500 supports only 150 concurrent connections to Auth users.

  The two WLC have abount 100-170 clients connected.

  Question:

  -It's going to be a problem with 150 connections simultaneous, despited when the not usin only one user for all customers-Wifi?

  -L' user WebAuth is possible with a Cisco ISE as Passthrough, no username & password must be entered by the user.

  If so, some guide information wolud be great.

  -When it is properly authenticated, a logout screen shows on the Windows client. Can he hide some how?

  Thanks for the replies ;-)

  Kind regards

  Norbert

  Its probably a limitation to the treatment of patients with the same credentials.  I never ran into a questions, but how many comments will complain, if they hit the button to accept a few seconds after :)

  Thank you

  Scott

  Help others using the system of rating and marking answers questions like "answered."

• Connection interface ASA inside and DMZ

  Hello

  I'm moving my current Internet/VPN link to a double link on different ASA and ISP providers.

  I want to create an INTERIOR on my ASA 5545 x interface that will connect directly to my Nexus 7 k Distribution or tanks

  The interface inside the ASA5520 is currently a virtual local network that was created on the Nexus 7 k.

  It seems simple enough to follow this same design, but using the different VLANs and the intellectual property regime.

  I also need to create an interface DMZ on the SAA on my distribution of Nexus 7 K device.

  Currently the ASA5520 DMZ interface comes from a VLAN that was created on the SAA and then to shared resources

  It seems simple enough to follow this same design, but using the different VLANs and the intellectual property regime.

  Is there a best practice approach document or advise that someone would pass along

  Models reference Cisco Secure Data center not dier DMZ. However, it is a very common configuration for the ASAs.

  Real wrinkles come in on the side of switch. You have the option to use physically separate switches (which you have already decided not to do), and a core of Nexus 7 k, the next option is to know how to separate the DMZ and the inside of the safe areas. The most secure, with a standard kernel k 7 would be to create a second VDC for the DMZ with no layer 3 services and have interface DMZ of the SAA to be the default gateway for hosts. A second option on the 7 k would be to stick with a VDC but put the DMZ VLAN charge either in their own VRF or simply once again make L2 only on the SAA with the ASA being the L3 bridge.

  There are several other approaches that you could take, but those that I have just described is the most commonly used.

• VPN client 3-party which connects to ASA

  Hi all

  There are some users allowed to connect via VPN using the Cisco VPN client.

  We have seen some users who connect with different clients e.g.: http://www.shrew.net/download/vpn

  I just tried it myself.

  Simply download the client, Import FCP, and connect to the ASA.

  The question is...

  The only way to prevent VPN users to connect with any client besides the Cisco VPN client is by defining the type of customer authorized to VPN on the SAA?

  The fact that anyone with a VPN profile can use another client to connect does not any security risks?

  Federico.

  Should not be a problem because it uses the same protocols IPSEC to encrypt/decrypt packets. A possibility is that if she is not comply 100% with the standard, it can could potentially cause unwanted behavior on the SAA.