Site to Site VPN question
Hello world
The vendor name is implemented server in our environment.
We implement VPN site-to-site.
Subnet it is interesting traffic 192.168.50.x
Server IP 192.168.50.1 - Switch1 - ASA - Site to site VPN - provider ASA.
Gateway server is on switch1 if this server requires access to the internet I need to know what config I need on ASA on my site?
I want the server to access the internet through the provider network
Concerning
Mahesh
Hello
Your crypto ACL would be:
ip access-list VPN-TO-VENDOR permit ip 192.168.50.0 255.255.255.0 anyCryptography providers ACL would be:
ip acces-list VPN-TO-COMPANY permit ip any 192.168.50.0 255.255.255.0All traffic from 192.168.50.0/24 out of the application interface map encryption for any destination would be sent to the seller through the VPN. It will be useful.
Tags: Cisco Security
Similar Questions
-
Site to site VPN question: passing a public IP with IPSEC
Hi all
I need to create a VPN tunnel site to site using IPSEC between two offices on the Internet. The offices belong to two different companies.
They gave me a series of 16 public IP addresses. One of these IP addresses is used on the ISP router and this is the next hop for my router. Another IP in the range is used on my router? s external interface (which is a Cisco 851) and he is also my site VPN endpoint. So far so good...
Here's my problem: the IP source of encrypted traffic, is a public address from within the IPs public 16 I (not the one on my router interface). The actual application that needs to send the encrypted data is a server in my local network, and it has a private IP address. The other site, expects to receive data, however, the public IP address. I used NAT between the private IP address of the server and its public IP address, but no data goes through the tunnel. Moreover, the tunnel between the two end points established without problem. The problem is that the source of my encrypted data is the public IP address and I don't know how to get through the tunnel. I enclose my router configuration.
Any help is appreciated.
The access list "natted-traffic" should say:
extended traffic natted IP access list
deny ip host 192.168.0.160 BB. ABM ABM BD
deny ip host 192.168.0.160 BB. ABM BB.BE
output
I hope this helps.
-Kanishka
-
ASA (Active standby) site-to-Site VPN Question
Hello
I had the question as below
Site A - 1 unit of VPN Netscreen firewall
Site B - 2 units of ASA VPN firewall
I'm trying to set up a VPN from Site to Site, but a problem with the configuration of the active standby.
Initially, I tried Site A 1 unit Netscreen and Site B 1 unit ASA vpn site-to-site. There's no problem.
but joins another ASA at site B and configure it as active / standby then I saw a few questions that I need help from here
Things that confuse me.
(1) do I need to use 2 public IP address on the SAA? (public IP for assets and the other a public IP ensures IP. it seems like a waste of the public IP address.)
(2) link failover and dynamic failover can be configured on the same interface?
Please help in this case, configuring VPN from Site to Site with active configuration / standby.
just to add to this,
just be careful when you dedicate an interface for dynamic failover, make sure that it is the highest capacity, or at least the same ability as an interface offers th
so if you use concert for passing traffic interface uses a concert for dynamic failover port, several times we saw people using the management for steful interface when they ports of concert and they run into issues where the dynamic function does not work as expected
You can read more here
https://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/configuration/guide/failover.html#wp1051759
-
ACL IPSEC site to site VPN question
Okay, so just as a test of validation, I have a question for the group. When you configure the cryptographic ACL that defines interesting traffic for a tunnel, are we able to use summaries?
So let say site B is 10.5.10.0/24 and site A can be summarized with 10.10.0.0/16. Is it acceptable to write something like below for the crypto acl?
access-list 101 permit ip 10.5.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255
A site would have the networks
10.10.0.0/24
10.10.1.0/24
etc.
Terminal head, then the ACL would be:
access-list 101 permit ip 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 10.5.10.0 0.0.0.255
Thanks for all your comments!
Hello
Yes, that's perfectly fine.
As long as we have routes set up correctly, nothing should stand in your way of configuring the acl like this.
Kind regards
Praveen
-
question links to site 2 site VPN with authentication cert
Currently we are accumulate tunnel site-2-site VPN with our client. Usually we use pre-shared key as authentication with other customers without any problems, but it must use authentication cert with her this time. But the question is that our CA is different from theirs. I tried a few times, but he failed. Is it someone please let me know that he must have the certificate issued by the same certification authority to create the VPN tunnel?
Thank you very much!
Hello
You can read this document to get a simple example of setting up a VPN S2S using certificates on an ASA:
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080aa5be1.shtml
Basically the sides must have the same certification authority and If there is an intermediate certificate that must be installed also. The ASA 2 will generate a CSR (certificate access code request), now then PKI will create a certificate for both parties, commonly called "certificate of identity".
Please pass a note and mark as he corrected the post helpful!
David Castro,
Kind regards
-
Cisco ASA Site to Site VPN IPSEC and NAT question
Hi people,
I have a question about the two Site to Site VPN IPSEC and NAT. basically what I want to achieve is to do the following:
ASA2 is at HQ and ASA1 is a remote site. I have no problem setting a static static is a Site to IPSEC VPN between sites. Guests residing in 10.1.0.0/16 are able to communicate with hosts in 192.168.1.0/24, but what I want is to configure the NAT with IPSEC VPN for this host to 10.1.0.0/16 will communicate with hosts in 192.168.1.0/24 with translated addresses
Just an example:
N2 host (10.1.0.1/16) contacted N1 192.168.1.5 with destination host say 10.23.1.5 No 192.168.1.5 (notice the last byte is the same in the present case,.5)
The translation still for the rest of the communication (host pings ip destination host 10.23.1.6 N3 N2 not 192.168.1.6 new last byte is the same)
It sounds a bit confusing to me, but I've seen this type of configuration before when I worked for the supplier of managed services where we have given our customers (Ipsec Site to Site VPN with NAT, don't know how it was setup)
Basically we contact the customer via site-to-site VPN hosts but their real address were hidden and we used as translated address more high 10.23.1.0/24 instead of (real) 192.168.1.0/24, last byte must be the same.
Grateful if someone can shed some light on this subject.
Hello
OK so went with the old format of NAT configuration
It seems to me that you could do the following:
- Configure the ASA1 with static NAT strategy
- access-list L2LVPN-POLICYNAT allowed ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
- public static 10.23.1.0 (inside, outside) access-list L2LVPN-POLICYNAT
- Because the above is a static NAT of the policy, this means that the translation will be made only when the destination network is 10.1.0.0/16
- If you have for example a PAT basic configuration to inside-> external traffic, the above NAT configuration and the custom of the actual configuration of PAT interfere with eachother
- ASA2 side, you can normally configure NAT0 / NAT Exemption for the 10.1.0.0/16 network
- Note of the INTERIOR-SHEEP access-list SHEEP L2LVPN
- the permitted INSIDE SHEEP 10.1.0.0 ip access list 255.255.0.0 10.23.1.0 255.255.255.0
- NAT (inside) 0-list of access to the INTERIOR-SHEEP
- You will need to consider that your access-list defining the VPN encrypted L2L traffic must reflect the new NAT network
- ASA1: allowed to access-list L2LVPN-ENCRYPTIONDOMAIN ip 10.23.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
- ASA2: list L2LVPN-ENCRYPTIONDOMAIN allowed ip 10.1.0.0 access 255.255.0.0 10.23.1.0 255.255.255.0
I could test this configuration to work tomorrow but I would like to know if it works.
Please rate if this was helpful
-Jouni
- Configure the ASA1 with static NAT strategy
-
Question creating a site to site vpn
I am trying to configure a site to site vpn to test and through http://www.ciscosecrets.info/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080950890.shtml still unable to establish a connection. I have attached the config for both the 5520's that I use. What Miss me.
Try this if you are pinging from the ASA
management-access inside
-
Question about ACL's with the 2621 when using site to site VPN
I set up two site to site vpn. We have an ASA at our headquarters and branches will IOS routers - one is a 1811 and the other 2621. Both are running the latest versions of IOS, respectively. The two VPN site-to-site do not work. I have a list of inbound on the external interfaces of both routers, access that allows only the IP address of the ASA IP traffic. All other traffic is denied. I put NAT overload upward in the typical form, and I use ip outgoing inspection on the same interface, to allow incoming traffic back to surfing the internet. This configuration works very well with the 1811, where all traffic is blocked except traffic IP (IPSEC) coming from the ASA. Guests at our headquarters can reach hosts behind the 1811 and vice versa.
Here's my problem: the 2621 is processing traffic encapsulated on the external interface and block this traffic because it does not match. I know because when I turn on logging / debugging on the 2621, I see inbound traffic blocked by the ACL. Technically, I guess that it does not, but to this interface, the traffic is always encapsulated so I think it fits to this access list and then go to the Cryptography decapsulation card and be sent to the destination host. Just as it does on the 1811. I have not 'wan' t to create another line in the access list for all subnets to Headquarters. Why is not it works the same way as it does on the 1811? Is there something else I need to activate?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Config of 1811:
!
version 12.4
horodateurs service debug datetime msec
Log service timestamps datetime localtime show-timezone msec
encryption password service
!
hostname BranchVPN1
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
logging buffered 51200 notifications
!
AAA new-model
!
!
AAA authentication login default local
activate the default AAA authentication no
authorization AAA console
AAA authorization exec default local
!
AAA - the id of the joint session
no ip source route
IP cef
!
!
IP inspect the audit trail
inspect the IP dns-timeout 10
inspect the name IP internet udp timeout 30
inspect the name IP internet tcp timeout 30
inspect the name IP internet ftp timeout 30
inspect the name IP internet http timeout 30
inspect the name firewall tcp IP
inspect the name IP firewall udp
inspect the name IP firewall icmp
IP inspect the dns name of the firewall
inspect the name IP firewall ftp
inspect the name IP firewall http
inspect the name IP firewall https
inspect the IP firewall name ftps
property intellectual auth-proxy max-nodata-& 3
property intellectual admission max-nodata-& 3
!
!
IP domain name xxxx
!
!
!
!
username xxxxxxxxxx
!
!
!
class-map correspondence vpn_traffic
police name of group-access game
!
!
VPN policy-map
class vpn_traffic
in line-action police 2000000 37500 pass drop exceeds-action
!
!
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
BA aes 256
preshared authentication
Group 2
ISAKMP crypto key address xxxx xxxxxx
ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10
!
life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac xxtransform
!
xxmap 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
defined peer xxxx
Set transform-set xxtransform
PFS group2 Set
match the address tunnelnetworks
static inverse-road
!
!
!
interface Loopback0
172.16.99.1 the IP 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
Description Connection to Internet (DHCP)
DHCP IP address
IP access-group outside_in in
no ip redirection
no ip unreachable
no ip proxy-arp
inspect the firewall on IP
NAT outside IP
IP virtual-reassembly
automatic duplex
automatic speed
No cdp enable
xxmap card crypto
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
Description of the connection to the local network
address 172.20.1.1 IP 255.255.255.0
no ip redirection
no ip unreachable
no ip proxy-arp
IP nat inside
IP virtual-reassembly
automatic duplex
automatic speed
No cdp enable
VPN service-policy input
!
interface Serial0/0/0
no ip address
Shutdown
No cdp enable
!
interface Serial0/1/0
no ip address
Shutdown
!
IP forward-Protocol ND
IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 dhcp
!
no ip address of the http server
local IP http authentication
no ip http secure server
IP nat inside source list nat - acl interface FastEthernet0/0 overload
!
IP nat - acl extended access list
refuse any 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 ip
allow an ip
outside_in extended IP access list
allow udp any eq bootps host 255.255.255.255 eq bootpc
allow an ip host (ASA IPADDR)
deny ip any any newspaper
IP extended access list police
deny ip host xxxx any
deny ip any host xxxx
IP 172.20.1.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
tunnelnetworks extended IP access list
permit host 172.16.99.1 ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
IP 172.20.1.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
!
recording of debug trap
logging source-interface Loopback0
exploitation forest xxxx
access-list 160 note t is
not run cdp
!
!
control plan
!
Banner motd ^ CCAuthorized technician!
^ C
!
Line con 0
line to 0
line vty 0 4
exec-timeout 5 0
Synchronous recording
entry ssh transport
line vty 5 15
exec-timeout 5 0
Synchronous recording
entry ssh transport
!
Scheduler allocate 20000 1000
end------------------------------------------------------------------------
2621 Config:
!
version 12.3
horodateurs service debug datetime msec
Log service timestamps datetime localtime show-timezone msec
encryption password service
!
hostname BranchVPN2
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
logging buffered 51200 notifications
no console logging
!
AAA new-model
!
!
AAA authentication login default local
activate the default AAA authentication no
authorization AAA console
AAA authorization exec default local
AAA - the id of the joint session
IP subnet zero
no ip source route
IP cef
!
!
IP domain name xxxx
!
IP inspect the audit trail
inspect the IP dns-timeout 10
inspect the name IP internet udp timeout 30
inspect the name IP internet tcp timeout 30
inspect the name IP internet ftp timeout 30
inspect the name IP internet http timeout 30
inspect the name firewall tcp IP
inspect the name IP firewall udp
inspect the name IP firewall icmp
inspect the name IP firewall ftp
inspect the name IP firewall http
Max-events of po verification IP 100
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
username xxxxxxxxxxxx
!
!
!
class-map correspondence vpn_traffic
police name of group-access game
!
!
VPN policy-map
class vpn_traffic
in line-action police 2000000 37500 pass drop exceeds-action
!
!
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
BA aes 256
preshared authentication
Group 2
ISAKMP crypto key address xxxx xxxxx
ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10
!
life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac xxtransform
!
xxmap 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
defined peer xxxx
Set transform-set xxtransform
PFS group2 Set
match the address tunnelnetworks
reverse-road remote-peer
!
!
!
!
interface Loopback0
172.16.99.2 the IP 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
Description Connection to Internet (DHCP)
DHCP IP address
IP access-group outside_in in
no ip redirection
no ip unreachable
no ip proxy-arp
NAT outside IP
inspect the firewall on IP
automatic duplex
automatic speed
No cdp enable
xxmap card crypto
!
interface Serial0/0
no ip address
Shutdown
No cdp enable
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
Description of the connection to the local network
IP 172.20.2.1 255.255.255.0
no ip redirection
no ip unreachable
no ip proxy-arp
IP nat inside
automatic duplex
automatic speed
No cdp enable
VPN service-policy input
!
interface Serial0/1
no ip address
Shutdown
No cdp enable
!
IP nat inside source list nat - acl interface FastEthernet0/0 overload
no ip address of the http server
local IP http authentication
no ip http secure server
IP classless
IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 dhcp
!
!
!
IP nat - acl extended access list
refuse any 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 ip
allow an ip
outside_in extended IP access list
allow udp any eq bootps host 255.255.255.255 eq bootpc
allow an ip host (ASA IPADDR)
deny ip any any newspaper
IP extended access list police
deny ip host xxxx any
deny ip any host xxxx
IP 172.20.2.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
tunnelnetworks extended IP access list
permit host 172.16.99.2 ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
IP 172.20.2.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
recording of debug trap
logging source-interface Loopback0
exploitation forest xxxx
not run cdp
!
!
!
!
!
Banner motd ^ CCCAuthorized technician!
^ C
!
Line con 0
line to 0
line vty 0 4
exec-timeout 5 0
Synchronous recording
entry ssh transport
line vty 5 15
exec-timeout 5 0
Synchronous recording
entry ssh transport
!
!
endPlease check if this helps:
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/12_3t/12_3t8/feature/guide/gt_crpks.html
Federico.
-
Site to site VPN, I need all internet traffic to exit the site.
I have 2 sites connected via a pair of SRX5308
A = 192.168.1.0/24
IP WAN = 1.1.1.1
B = 192.168.2.0/24
IP WAN = 2.2.2.2
Now what I need to do, is to have all traffic from B to go to the site one even traffic destined to the internet. That is, I need internet traffic out of our network with the IP 1.1.1.1, even if it is from the network B.
On my I have set up a route 1.1.1.1 of the ISP, then a value by default 0/0 to 192.168.1.1 it ASA knows how to get to the peer VPN is a more specific route, but sends everything above the tunnel, at the remote end which then hairpin of ASA routes internet outside its own WAN port traffic.
I can understand though not how to so the same thing on the pair of SRX5308 they either don't raise the tunnel or internet route to the local site address B.
Anyone have any ideas?
I need to do this because we are logging and monitoring of internet traffic to A site via tapping from upstream to various IDS solutions and will not (cannot) reproduce this to all our remote sites.
Thank you
Dave.
After some more thought and testing I came up with a workable solution to my own problem. I'll share it here in case it can help others.
(1) use the wizard at both ends to implement a normal VPN that connects the two segments of network 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0
(2) go to site VPN - VPN policy remote router192.168.2.1 and click Edit
(a) disable Netbios
(b) select "None" from the drop-down list the remote IP address.
(c) to apply the change
3) go to the VPN-> VPN policy on the head end site (192.168.1.1) and click Edit
(a) disable Netbios
(b) select "None" from the drop-down list the local IP address
(c) to apply the change
Now all the traffic wil go down the VPN tunnel and exit to the internet on the site of head end. Hope this helps others with the same question.
-
I have a VPN site-to-site existing on Azure and Azure a new subnet created on the local network that must be able to reach.
I added the new subnet within azure for the VPN and add a static route on the RRAS server win 2012 for routing.
On the initial installation of a RRAS-Site VPN site (I didn't configure it) I think the interesting traffic specified must be sent through the VPN Tunnel, but I knew how to specify the new subnet via RRAS, I don't want to delete and re-create the VPN Site to Site.
Y at - there anyone who can help please.
Thank you
Philippe
Hello
Your question is beyond the scope of this community.
I suggest that repost you on the Azure MSDN Forums:
https://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/azure/en-us/home?category=windowsazureplatform
TechNet forums Azure:
https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/azure/en-us/home?category=windowsazureplatform
TechNet Server forums.
http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?category=WindowsServer
TechNet forums:
https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home
MSDN forums:
https://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home
See you soon.
-
SBS 2008 office1 Serv2008 Office 2 need to share assets between them via a site to site VPN tunnel
Hi all.
I really need help on this one.
The office 1 installer running SBS2008 Office 2 running Server 2008.
Each firm has its own FQDN Office 1 CompanyABC 2 A_B_C of the company office.
Each firm has its own internal IP address pool Office 1 192.168.69.xxx and office 192.168.20.xxx 2.
Site to site VPN tunnel between 2 office routers Netgear SRX5308 1 and 2 Netgear FVS318G Office established and working.
Each firm has its own DNS server and acts as a domain controller
How to configure the 2 networks to see each other and be able to use assets on every network (files, printers)?
Is it so simple that the addition of another pool internal IP for each DNS server?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Hello
Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.
I suggest that repost you your question in the Forums of SBS.
https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?Forum=smallbusinessserver
"Windows Small Business Server 2011 Essentials online help"
https://msdn.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/home-client.aspx
TechNet Server forums.
http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?category=WindowsServer
See you soon.
-
Cisco 3640 to the PIX 501 site 2 site VPN performance specifications.
I intend on creating a site-2-site VPN in Star configuration with a Cisco 3640 as the hub and PIX 501 at the remote sites. My question is around the plug that I read.
.
The specifications for a PIX-501-BUN-K9 tell PIX 501 3DES Bundle (chassis, SW, 10 users, 3DES).
.
A question is what really "10 users. Which is the limit of the number of concurrent sessions, I have on the VPN at a given time, or that it means something else?
.
I also read the specs say that the Maximum number of VPN tunnels that can support a PIX 501 is 5. Because I'm not going to make a tunnel between the PIX 501 at the remote site and the 3640 on the central site, I think I would be OK. Is that correct or is the max value talk the maximum number of concurrent sessions on the tunnel tunnels?
.
Thank you.
UDP traffic always creates a session in the PIX so that the return traffic will be allowed in. The UDP timeout is 2 minutes but IIRC. If you go around NAT with a statement of "nat 0" should not create an xlate I think.
The real time is hard to say really, probably around 2 minutes for a UDP-only user, you would probably make a few 'local sho' orders on the PIX to really see for sure however.
-
I have vpn site-to-site on firewall Cyberoam (outside), remote VPN access created the (inside) Firewall ASA.
the question that I cannot access site to Site Vpn remote access VPN subnet
See attached drawing
A likely reason is that you are missing just the following command on the ASA:
same-security-traffic permit intra-interface
Or you might miss a NAT exemption from outside to outside.
-
site to site vpn - internal network even on both sides of the tunnel
Hi all
I have the following questions about the Site Site VPN using ASA 5510 and 5505
Scenerio is
1. we have five branches & headquarters
2. we want to establish a vpn between branches & Head Office (VPN from Site to Site)
3. all branches & head office using the same internal network (192.168.150.0 255.255.255.0)
My question is
How can I configure VPN site-to-site between branches & head office with the same internal network (192.168.150.0/24)
Please help me with the configuration steps & explanation
I have experience on setting up vpn site to site between branches with differnet internal network (for example: 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24)
Waiting for your valuable response
Hello
Here are a few links on policy nat
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008046f31a.shtml#T10
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807d2874.shtml
Concerning
-
Site to Site VPN. pick up DfltGrpPolicy instead of Tunnel-Group
Hello
Our ASA was set by a consultant some time ago to allow connectivity SSLVPN RSA backend. I am now trying to get a Site to Site VPN working but seem to get into a lot of difficulties. I get a load of the l2l VPN-related debugging messages which I believe is set up correctly. Here's what I think is of interest
"January 24, 2009 12:13:01: % ASA-6-113009: AAA recovered in group policy by default (DfltGrpPolicy) to the user = x.x.x.x".
The user specifies the IP address of the Cisco router remote that we try to get the VPN configuration.
I have to admit that I haven't done a lot with the side things SSLVPN so this part of the config is out of my depth, that's why I post here.
If anyone can help it would be really appreciated.
Here are the relevant details (I can post more if there isn't enough). My question is, how do I get the l2l using the tunnel-group and not the default group policy?
Thanks in advance for any help.
dynamic-access-policy-registration
DfltAccessPolicy
WebVPN
list of URLS no
SVC request no svc default
RADIUS protocol AAA-server VPNAUTH
AAA-server VPNAUTH *. *. *
interval before new attempt-5
timeout 3
key *.
AAA authentication enable LOCAL console
AAA authentication http LOCAL console
LOCAL AAA authentication serial console
the ssh LOCAL console AAA authentication
AAA authentication LOCAL telnet console
LOCAL AAA authorization command
attributes of Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy
value of DNS server! !. !. !
VPN-idle-timeout no
VPN-tunnel-Protocol webvpn
enable IP-comp
enable IPSec-udp
field default value mondomaine.fr
the address value vpnpool pools
WebVPN
enable http proxy
SVC Dungeon - install any
SVC keepalive 60
SVC generate a new method ssl key
SVC request no svc default
disable ActiveX-relays
disable file entry
exploration of the disable files
disable the input URL
tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup webvpn-attributes
message of rejection-RADIUS-
IPSec-attributes tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup
pre-shared-key *.
tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup ppp-attributes
PAP Authentication
ms-chap-v2 authentication
attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultWEBVPNGroup
address vpnpool pool
authentication-server-group VPNAUTH
tunnel-group DefaultWEBVPNGroup webvpn-attributes
message of rejection-RADIUS-
tunnel-group x.x.x.x type ipsec-l2l
tunnel-group ipsec-attributes x.x.x.x
pre-shared-key *.
Wayne
Do "sh run all tunnel-group" you should see the strategy of group associated with it.
for example:
tunnel-group 1.1.1.1 type ipsec-l2l
tunnel-group 1.1.1.1 General attributes
no accounting server group
Group Policy - by default-DfltGrpPolicy
tunnel-group 1.1.1.1 ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *.
by the peer-id-validate req
no chain
no point of trust
ISAKMP retry threshold 10 keepalive 2
Let me know if it helps.
See you soon,.
Gilbert
Maybe you are looking for
-
Problems with firmware of Toshiba TL 838 - Youtube and Toshiba Places does not work
Hey,. I have a TL838 TV with: -6.4.0V 1 firmware-Mboot version 00518740-MFC version 244930 About 1 month ago youtube stopped working.A few days ago, Toshiba places stopped working again.The TV is connected to the Internet and connection test is also
-
ProBook Crash/unable to Boot by using a recovery disk
The title explains it well enough. My computer crashed after getting the blue screen of death. I was unable to boot after that. I ordered the HP recovery discs. And now I am unable to boot from the recovery disc. I also gave a screen that says device
-
printer uses three colors for printing
Black photosmart 5510 printer uses three colors for printing
-
Error messages from backup system «Ox8078014B and Ox80070570»
When you try to back up my Windows 10 System I get error 'Ox8078014B and Ox80070570' messages and backup fails? What can I do?