Similar Questions

• WRT54G2 slows down the internet connection

  Hello.

  Somehow, my WRT54G2 router slows down my internet connection. My PC is connected by cable and I cannot watch youtube videos and gave to wait fo 20 seconds for gmail to load up. If I connect the PC to the modem directly then everything works fine. Reset to the default router configuration solves the problem for a few weeks, but this solution is quite annoying. Is there another way to solve this problem once and for all?

  Thnx.

  In the latest version of firmware notes, it is written:

  -updated with the patch to solve the problems of ping

  I'll try to update my routers firmware now, if this will fix my problem, I probably won't respond to this thread more.

  Router support page:

  http://homesupport.Cisco.com/en-us/wireless/LBC/WRT54G2

  Firmware release notes:

  http://homedownloads.Cisco.com/downloads/WRT54G2V1.5_1.5.01.013_FwReleaseNotes.txt

• Dllhost.exe surrogate COM slow down the computer using the memory

  Hello

  I could really use some help if anyone has the time. :-)
  My computer behaves strangely since I made a restore point.
  I did the restore point because I could not get online, oddly enough it turned out to be a loose wire.
  Anyway, now there is an application that keeps popping up in my task manager using most of my cpu, so my
  computer bogged down. It is named dllhost.exe COM surrogate and when I opened its location
  He was in my folder windows32. It is not my services that I can see, but it seems to be bound to play
  video or music files. I could be wrong.
  I did the usual antivirus (avast free edition free antivirus and malwarbytes) analysis, I defragmented
  my computer, I did a scan of system, I did a scan of the memory...  I can't understand.
  Any suggestions?
  My computer has 16 GB of installed RAM and 1 TB HDD I am running Windows 7
  Professional 64-bit.
  Thank you in advance.  :-)

  I did go to the task manager of windows, processes, sort them alphabetically by the description column, you can list by going to display and select column, and then down to the substitution of com and do a right-click and choose end process... you may need to do more than once... This will remove at least for awhile... it is mainly used to display thumbnail pictures in my photo folder... you can the delete permanently, but then you would not have miniature photos...

• Why FFx21, from the opening, thus creating three CACHE of INTERNET files duplicate (01, 02, 03 & tot'ng 12 MB) slows down the site?

  On the 'OPENING' Firefox for the web, there is an initial use of 12 + MB of use via INTERNET CACHE files. These files show up, when using CCleaner, as... \_CACHE_001, 002, 003 each with a size of say 4 096 Ko. The browser seems to "lag" - particularly visible when I type in one of the available search bars... I tap and then wait for the letter or the word to display. In addition, Firefox crashed several times since the upgrade to the latest version (ffox 21). I have two images CCleaner printscreen to show files so useful, but not sure how to enter them here.

  Hello, these are the files where firefox stores its cache - you won't need CCleaner (in fact, it will be only slow down the things that you have already noticed, given that these files must be recreated after the next startup of the browser), you can also clear the cache with the mechanism built into firefox: How to clear the cache of Firefox

• Slow down the performance of the internet in general.

  PERFORMANCE OF THE INTERNET IN GENERAL

  Please comment on the following: A RESPONSE to MY QUESTION WAS: "the thing that affects the performance of the Internet is the line speed you use."  The answer refers to the DSL, or ROADRUNNER, or WI - FI and other Internet services?  But, of course, there are known factors that can slow down your browsing habits: more than a running program; reading information while listening to music, too, on the same PC; not enough space on the hard drive; possible viral infection, classic disk cleanup, but also occasional Defrag, etc.  Thank you very much.

  Hello

  The type of Internet connection that you use is the most important factor in determining the speed of your connection. The most common three ways to connect to the Internet at home are dial-up, DSL and cable. If you have the choice, cable is usually the fastest, but DSL and cable are faster than dial-up.

  See: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-vista/Why-is-my-Internet-connection-so-slow

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/help/Internet-Explorer/slow-five-tips-to-boost-performance

• Can I use an SDXC (512MB) card as a drive hard primary (such as startup HD with El Capitan) on my iMac 5 K - end 2015? It will slow down the performance of the iMac?

  Can I use an SDXC (512MB) card as a drive hard primary (such as startup HD with El Capitan) on my iMac 5 K - end 2015? It will slow down the performance of the iMac?

  

  I did it with a 32GB SDHC UHS - I Transcend

  

  I do not recommend under OS X from such media, but it works very well. I was preparing for my review of the CPHA Yosemite and did not want to mess with the internal drive of OS X.

• How do I disable Adobe Flash - too many sites have Flash ads that slow down the browser unless an analysis.

  Some pages contain 3, 4, 5 or more adobe flash ads running at the same time, which slows down the browser a lot. Then, if you happen to have several tabs open, the browser is dragging virtually interrupted and many times is not responding at all.

  I would like to be able to choose whether or not a page can run flash content - not it be something that works all the time for each page, with the only option being to kill the plugincontainer process in taskmanager - who kills even the Adobe Flash elements you can watch; like a youtube video.

  Why is there not a way to disable Adobe Flash in the browser? I have updated Firefox and Adobe Flash, but nowhere is there at - it an option to turn on or off according to your needs.

  A control can be added to the Internet Options that you can set to have a page request before it is allowed to run the Flash content? Having that kind of control would GREATLY increase the pleasure of sailing on several pages.

  Any information on how to do it, would be appreciated.

  Hello, this is already possible in firefox: go to firefox/tools > addons > plugins and shockwave flash to Activategame. then the plugin will be disabled by default but can be enabled on a site-by-site basis.

• Slow down the automatic transition

  Hello!

  I'm working on an introductory presentation with automatic switching between slides. I want to slow down the presentation (I tried to put a 15 seconds delay) but it keeps on changing every second...

  Can someone help me?

  (I must say that my speech is in french... so I hope I used the right conditions...!)

  The procedure is:

  Select all of the slides in the Panel of the browser (click on a slide and then use: control)

  Inspector > Animation > add an effect of > select the effect in the list

  on the start menu, transition drop-down list box select automatically

  change the time of 15 seconds (double-click the entry, type in 15 and then on enter)

  This not work?

• Slow down the Audio and keep beat related Sections

  Hello people,

  I have a song that I would like to remix and I all set beat matching.  When I go to slow down the audio I lose my bearings.  Is there anyway that I can keep the sections that I beat matched and slow down the audio so these sections remain?

  For example, that the song is 120bpm and I have this rhythm corresponded perfectly.  If I have a loop of 4 bars and slow down the audio I have more 4 perfect bars.  I want to be able to slow down the audio and still have my bars 4 faultless.

  I hope that makes sense.

  Logic Pro X: using Varispeed to change speed

• Slow down the speed of FAR FAR AWAY in iMovie 10.1

  In iMovie 10.1 FAR FAR AWAY effect scrolls too fast and I don't think I should buy a market after effect fix a bug. How can I slow down the speed of the text please?  Roll the credits cost $20 and it will not work with updates so it is not an option, in addition to its construction in already, it is adjustable and now is not!  HELP PLEASE

  See that work around posted by Vanessa D 19 dec in this link

  Slow down the title Far Far Away in iMovie 10.1?

  I don't use version 10 so can't comment, but the link it seems to work.

• Prevent the Beep.vi slow down the VI

  Hello

  I'm working on a metronome that should run for a period of x with a frequency of x. The time is in seconds and rate.

  Whenever there is the beet, the VI must make a beep. This can be done easily by the beep.vi, but the standard for the beep.vi is to play one system.

  This is a fairly long tone (10 of Windows). And so, I want to put my own frequency and duration of the beep.

  But when I change this in the beep.vi, the VI will wait for the set time (msec) before it continues the vi. If it slows down the whole VI.

  Is there a way to make the beep.vi a sound signal with frequency and duration that I put, without that it slows down the VI?

  Thank you!

  Have the code "beep" performed asynchronously to your hand VI: have the VI in another loop and use a queue / notifier to notify the loop when playing the main loop.

• Unable to connect to the internet using Firefox or IE

  Unable to connect to the internet using Firefox or IE. I can ping other pc on my network home and can ping websites such as google.com. Other PCs on the home network connect without problems. Nothing has changed in the network or the configuration of IE/Firefox. The only change is that I have installed the update to Vista SP1

  Hello

  Stack TCP/IP Winsock settings in Vista has probably been corrupted.

  Journal to this page and scroll down, there are instructions for Vista.

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/811259

  Jack, MVP-Networking. EZLAN.NET

• Performance - remove igdkmd64.sys monitor - its by slowing down the boot process

  Hello

  I am running windows 7 Home premium SP1 64-bit and the monitor above suggests that I try to delete the driver above because it slows down the startup / boot process

  Can someone please suggest easy steps to remove the same and if there are implications for the removal of the driver

  Hello

  What is there to process you followed to remove it... It's actually not a bad file... Its graphic driver Intel. Igdkmd64 sys is the Intel Graphics Kernel Mode Driver for Microsoft Windows 8, Windows 7, Windows Vista, and Windows XP 64 - bit operating systems.

  the igdkmd64.sys file could be the driver Intel Graphics. Have you tried to download the drivers directly from the Intel web site? If this is not the case, try using this link:

  http://www.Intel.com/p/en_US/support/detect

• My laptop is down the internet connection several times daily.

  Internet connection

  My laptop is down the internet connection several times daily. I can usually restore the connection to solve the problem. It restores the connection for a while but always says the same thing. «A network cable connected correctly isnot or can be broken and also problem with wireless adapter access point.» I live with 3 other people and we all use the same router and they have no problems.

  Also, my computer has some weird pink points at the top of the home screen. So sometimes when I pull up to early or a photo or something there are pink lines on the photos. No idea why this is happening and how to fix it?

  I discovered that I had the same problem of the abandonment of the Internet with HP envy. I went on the Intel site and found that they had a fix for the problem I do not know the wireless card you have that I go to your site of NIC and check and see if they have a patch for your network card. After I installed the patch for my NIC my problem disappeared. HP sent me an email with the appropriate also fix.

• Lumetri slows down the encoding of color correction more "obsolete."

  Based on my own informal tests, I notice that Lumetri effects on an element in a sequence slows down the process of encoding significantly compared to the same general objective realized with effects of correction of the so-called color "obsolete". Other messages on the forum seem to confirm this.

  I guess the older "out-of-date" color correction effects are far from obsolete. Looks more Adobe innovates and push this crowd of material premium to their last, Lumetri, but that the older effects are more obsolete than obsolete, probably to be there for a long time... iow, use them as you wish for you will hit all compat issues in the foreseeable future.

  Is that what that sounds right?

  My goal by asking is to better align myself as a user of first... my tendency is to take the final product as user recommendations, but that can be a trap when it is really a big innovative push who sometimes material/performance hits that make it unrealistic for all users.

  I have a portable old 5 year, the Sony Vaio VPCF215FX w/6 GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce GT 540 M, 1 TB SSD.  I am able to do, but I really need to think intelligently avoiding external USB drives, using smart rendering, etc. When I tried an experiment with older color effects, I saw a significant reduction in the encoding time (General of my test described below). For this reason, I'm stepping back and thinking that the push 'use Lumetri' everything is beautiful for those who really need, want, and also have the material that can reasonably be taken in charge, but maybe not for someone like me, at least if I can avoid using older effects and with all the same. I just can't justify Lumetri in some cases where it slows down encoding medium.

  It is not that my hw is unable to use it but when I can use older effects and get a nice discount time coding for my not pro use, seems useful to avoid the Lumetri currently, until the upgrade hw or something. I wanted to just check-in here on the forum because everything above is me in a vacuum, I felt ready to hear some voices from the community on my point of view.

  Oh, my test...

  Create two sequences, each with the same single element from the same ~ 60 second clip of Canon EOS 70 d (ALL-I, 1920 x 1080, 23.976 FPS, MPEG-4 AVC / H.264, VBR in.) Container MOV), where each sequence has the following effects of color...

  Seq1-UsingLumetri uses the following color effects:

  • Lumetri #1 (primary): globally adjust contrast/tone/WB Correction of basic and secondary HSL to affect parts of the installation image.
  • Lumetri #2 (secondary): none other than the Secondary to affect an object moving on tracks with a circular mask.

  Seq2-NonLumetri uses the following color effects:

  • The fast color corrector: adjust overall contrast/tone/WB (identical to what Lumetri No. 1 above is without its Secondary).
  • #1 RGB color corrector: Color Correction secondary only to affect certain parts of the image (the highest Lumetri #1 only secondary HSL what).
  • #2 RGB color corrector: secondary color Correction only affect an object moving on tracks with a circular mask (what does the #2 above Lumetri).

  I coded then everyone if above with such parameters as input media, none made smart (because I want to see encoding time with effects) and out of type, etc. The result was that Seq1-Lumetri took about 225 seconds, while Seq2-NonLumetri took about 150 seconds, about 50% more time when using Lumetri on the same ~ 60 second clip entry.

  Note, part of the reason why I'm here is to ask my question above one, sort of general/summary, but it is also based on my not not having seen a single Lumetri color correction tutorial that describes these nuances... check in shades that seem to be essential for efficient use of the product by someone like me. I want to know about Lumetri, that's fine, but I also really want to know how to use the product together more effectively... to do this, seems to me, should not take account of the effects of color more older 'obsolete '. I want to at least know if there is agreement, or if I could be missing something here.

  Thank you!

  "Legacy" color tools more elderly are simpler "peripheral" in the code if I understand and don't work... especially... but as has been clearly established by colorists, especially if you do anything with the "" range"in the young or 3-way controls, you can get weird and very... results not correct not...

  That said, if you stick to their tools without using the modifiers of the range and not to push things too far, they work for the most part, kind of like what you would expect.

  Thus, on this laptop old of yours, stick to the Legacy tools is probably a good thing. And works very well for you. If you move up to a more recent material, you probably want to look more like the Lumetri Panel.

  Currently, I am working with the help of a mixture of Lumetri for the 'main' ranking, but using 3-way & RGB secondary additional & such.

  Neil