Star redirect speaks IPSEC traffic on hub site

Similar Questions

• 301 redirects - how long to keep old site hosting go?

  Hello. We have a company that is about to rebrand itself, so it gets a new website and a new as well domain name, both are sites of Business Catalyst. I did some reading on this and think that I know everything that I have to make about 301 redirects, etc. in order to not lose search ranking. One thing I'm unclear on if, after placing the 301 redirects to direct traffic to the new content to the site, how long the old place accommodation had to be kept going? I read 3 months to a year to keep the 301 redirects in place to ensure indexing.

  I plan to redirect 301 pages from the old site to the new site and then after 3 months (assuming that any good) drop the former host of site (only for reasons of cost at this point) and add the domain name to the new site and will forward it to the new domain name. Can anyone confirm that this is a healthy approach to please, or let me know of any problems they see in my simple plan.

  Thank you

  Grant

  3 months should be plenty. Make sure you submit the "Change of address" form within the webmaster tools. I think that Katherine Anderson recently made a Sandpile BC on it.

• I think that my safari is infected with the virus, he on redirect keeps me from another Web site each time that I click my mouse or press a key on my keyboard... Help!

  I think that my safari (Yosemite) is infected by the virus, he on redirect keeps me from another Web site each time that I click of my mouse or press a key on my keyboard... Help!

  I can't seem to download the print screen, here, anyway, it starts the LINK share appears every time it redirect:

  -"ps4ux.com/click? h = Ax722bagzrmWM3RP_5wPSvP63fG7dqaJCNo55LiVexxUaivPBxSeS7A3C2V4-bO...» »-

  middle part is hidden by «...» »

  the last part is:

  -"ttp: 3% a % 2F % www.apple.com%2F 2F & rt = 46 & date_sid = 50fc88582b4e8512b3e35e56351a22a3" in a new tab.

  Run etrecheck to go to etrecheck.com and see what is running under the hood.

• Why google redirects my research to unwanted Web sites

  a scan antivirus over Macafee shows no problem on my computer and yet google continues to redirect my research to unwanted Web sites

  Hello Marilyn,.
  Your computer is probably infected by malicious software. Try the sequence of steps 1 and 2 in this virus/malware removal guide: http://www.selectrealsecurity.com/malware-removal-guide
  It provides simple instructions on how to remove malware from a computer. If you have any questions, just ask. I hope this helps you.
  Brian

• Redirect a part of the vrf traffic between 2 sites over a redundant link

  Hey guys,.

  We have one customer (in the vrf) with 2 sites in different States and the execution of our soul of mpls... Our main link in our heart is affected by the degradation of service and want to route the client on our redundant link while retaining all other clients going on our primary link - is it possible?

  The customer in question has its own vrf (L3VPN) on both sites and running on mpls between sites. We would like to re - route this particular customer to take our backup path, while keeping everyone between sites through the primary. We do not use, rather LDP to build the SPLM.

  I don't think it's possible to only re - route a customer, but I thought I would ask the question.

  We cannot failover to secondary link for everyone between sites because the link doesn't have the capability.

  Thanks in advance.

  Hello

  Using MPLS YOU would certainly be an option. You must configure MPLS TE LS during the backup. You must also set up a separate look-back on each PE interface and use this address of the loopback interface as the next hop for the specific VRF

  IP vrf X

  BGP jump next loopback 999

  Route IP 255.255.255.255 Tu1

  In this way make you sure that only the traffic for this specific VRF would be above the tunnel of TE.

  Concerning

• Collect data netflow on the load decrypted in IPSec traffic

  Hello

  I have a case where our customers have an IPSec Site to Site tunnel, where traffic is hair-pin on a 2901 router.

  They would collect netflow on the load decrypted for accounting purposes.

  The problem is that according to the order of operations on the router IOS, the netflow is recorded before the packet is decrypted penetration, and after the package is encrypted evacuation.

  Is there a solution to this, or someone has experience with alternative solutions for this scenario?

  (e.g. DURATION encrypted traffic to another device which decrypts and generate netflow data?)

  Best regards

  Steffen

  Hey, Steffen,.

  Yes the path of the EFC is so different [Card Crypto is a feature of output while the Tunnel Protection is a feature of post-encap].

  Therefore, we can apply all feature output such as netflow on a tunnel or a virtual-template interface since then we validate the traffic post-decapsulation.

  An example of one of my box [a vpn to 4.2.2.2 peer ping]. NetFlow which attracts traffic after decryption.

  R1 - HUB #sh ip cache flow. I Vi1

  Vi1 172.16.1.1 Et0/1 4.2.2.2 01 0000 0800 153

  See you soon,.

  Olivier

• How to pass the traffic of a site VPN S2S by ASA to another S2S VPN site?

  I have a need for hosts on separate VPN networks connected to my ASA corp to communicate among themselves.  Example: Host A site 1 a need to communicate with host B on the site 2.  Both sites 1 & 2 are connected via the VPN S2S.  I would get every site traffic to flow through the ASA at the other site.  Where should I start my configuration?  NAT? ACL?

  I can ping each host in the network Corp. but cannot ping from one site to the other.  I set up same-security-traffic permit intra-interface and addition of NAT and rules the ACL to allow/permit 1 Site to contact Site 2.  When I do a trace of package through Deputy Ministers DEPUTIES, packets are allowed to pass. I read different that tell no NAT y at - it something at the other end of the VPN to do?  should NAT and ACLs rules be mirrored? Just in case, a site is an instance of MS Azure VM and the other is a 3rd party VM instance.

  On the HubASA, can I set up a new card encryption that selects the Site1 Site2 traffic and protect the traffic and value her counterpart Site2 public IP or just add this selection of traffic to the existing encryption card for the existing tunnel between HubASA and Site2?

  Just add this traffic to the existing encryption card.

  Remember that this should be added on three routers (two hubs and there has been talk).

  Site1

  CRYPTO ip access list allow Site2 subnet >

  CRYPTO ip access list allow subnet training3 >

  CRYPTO ip access list allow subnet HUB >

  Site2

  CRYPTO ip access list allow Site1 subnet >

  CRYPTO ip access list allow subnet training3 >

  CRYPTO ip access list allow subnet HUB >

  Training3

  CRYPTO ip access list allow Site1 subnet >

  CRYPTO ip access list allow Site2 subnet >

  CRYPTO ip access list allow subnet HUB >

  HUB

  CRYPTO_1 ip access list allow Site1 subnet >

  CRYPTO_1 ip access list allow Site1 subnet >

  CRYPTO_1 ip access list allow Site1 subnet >

  CRYPTO_2 ip access list allow Site2 subnet >

  CRYPTO_2 ip access list allow Site2 subnet >

  CRYPTO_2 ip access list allow Site2 subnet >

  CRYPTO_3 ip access list allow subnet training3 >

  CRYPTO_3 ip access list allow subnet training3 >

  CRYPTO_3 ip access list allow subnet training3 >

  Each of these ACLs is attributed to their respective crypto cards.  CRYPTO_1 is assigned the site1 crypto map, CRYPTO_2 is assigned to the site2 crypto card... etc.

  I hope that's clear

  In addition to this, you need to configure identity NAT / NAT provides both the HUB and the spokes of sites.

  --

  Please do not forget to select a correct answer and rate useful posts

• Unable to pass traffic between ASA Site to Site VPN Tunnel

  Hello

  I have problems passing traffic between two ASA firewall. The VPN tunnel is up with a dynamic IP and static IP address. I have attached a diagram of the VPN connection. I'm not sure where the problem lies and what to check next. I think I have all the roads and in the access lists are needed.

  I've also attached the ASA5505 config and the ASA5510.

  This is the first time that I've set up a VPN connection any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you

  Adam

  Hello

  Regarding your opinion of configuration Remote Site ASA that you have not added the internal networks of the Central Site VPN L2L configurations at all so the traffic does not pass through the VPN.

   access-list outside_1_cryptomap extended permit ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.128 10.182.226.0 255.255.*.* access-list exempt extended permit ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.128 10.182.226.0 255.255.*.* access-list exempt extended permit ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.128 10.182.0.0 255.255.*.* access-list exempt extended permit ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.128 192.168.170.0 255.255.*.* access-list exempt extended permit ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.128 192.168.172.0 255.255.*.* access-list exempt extended permit ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.128 140.15.0.0 255.255.*.* 

  Take a look at ACL configurations above. The 'exempt' ACL is used in configurations NAT0 and tells the ASA what traffic of exempting from NAT. "outside_1_cryptomap" ACL is used to tell the traffic between the subnets should be using the L2L VPN connection.

  So in short on the Remote Site ASA these ACLs should be identical. Make additions to the LIST of VPN L2L, then try again.

  I would also like to point out that to ensure that the Central ASAs L2L VPN ACL Site contains the same networks. The ACL on the Central Site will, of course, its internal subnets as the source and the site LAN remote destination.

  THW out of ' crypto ipsec to show his " shows you that only the SA between binding Site Central network and the Remote Site LAN was established. Others have not formed as the configuration is lacking at LEAST on the Remote Site ASA. Can also be the Central Site.

  -Jouni

• IPv6 on IPv4 VTI ipsec traffic

  Hello

  I have a VTI ipsec on ipv4 I use for LAN traffic between sites.

  Something like:

  interface Tunnel0

  IP 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0

  tunnel source 80.80.80.1

  tunnel destination 90.90.90.1

  ipv4 IPsec tunnel mode

  protection of IPsec profile vti_profile tunnel

  Now I want to tunnel IPv6 on those as well.

  I tried the simple addition of an IPv6 on Tunnel0 address, but that did not work.

  I can create a tunnel on the IPv4 link like this:

  Tunnel1 interface

  source of Tunnel0 tunnel

  tunnel destination 172.16.1.2

  ipv6ip tunnel mode

  enable IPv6

  3000::1/112 IPv6 address

  But I was wondering if there was another solution?

  See you soon,.

  Sylvain

  Sylvain,

  I don't think you can carry IPv6 on IPv4 ASIT.

  I believe that you have received a message that's not supported - negotiated proposals are explicitly for IPv4:

  local  ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0)
  remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0)
  

  There is a tunnel mode ipsec, ipv6, BUT it is ipv6 via IPv6 only.

  I think that your best choice is to run o IPsec instead of ASIT GRE if you want IPv6 tunnel at the same time.

  (Please note that I have not kept up-to-date with all the improvements of VTI recently, maybe things have changed)

  Marcin

• can not see the stars of review and comments from clothing sites

  E.g. #1 = 'Landsend.com', click on 'man', 'pants '.
  http://www.landsend.com/IX/mens-clothing/men/mens-pants/index.html?SEQ=1 ~ catNumbers = 1 & 2 ~ 23 & visible = 1 ~ 2 ~ 1 & cm_re = D-4-8 & pageSize = 72

      Can see pants and pictures, but where the usual 1-5 *s are, it says "Rating".  I click on the "Men's Pleat Front Traditional Fit No Iron Dress Twill Trousers" (the first pants picture/option, Item # 426850-A61) and up pops all of the information EXCEPT the photo/s that should be on the left, and the "Views + Reviews" with all of the comments under that.
  

  For example #2 = "underarmour.com', 'Man', 'Accessories', ' Backpacks and bags ', 'AU Hustle Storm backpack.
  http://www.underarmour.com/shop/us/en//pid1238440-040#BV-reviews

      Can see    "****1/2* (2) Read All Reviews"   but the reviews are missing and when I click on "Read all Reviews", the screen moves down, but nothing else changes and the reviews are not there.
  

  For example #3 = "eddiebauer.com', 'Man', 'Shirts',"Classic Fit legend wash Oxford Shirt - solid short sleeve"
  http://www.eddiebauer.com/EB/men/shirts/index.cat

      Under "Men's Shirts", I see the stars and how many people have rated it [ex.- *** (17)].  If I click on the ratings/stars or on " Classic Fit Legend Wash Oxford Shirt - Solid Short Sleeve", the next page shows up-
  

  http://www.eddiebauer.com/catalog/product.jsp?ensembleId=44679 & & categoryId = 9 & categoryName = SHIRTS & pCategoryId = 2 & pCategoryName = MEN & gpCategoryId = 1 & gpCategoryName = EB & catPath = ~ ~ categoryId = 9 ~ ~ categoryName = SHIRTS ~ ~ pCategoryId = 2 ~ ~ pCategoryName = MEN ~ ~ gpCategoryId = 1 ~ ~ gpCategoryName = EB & viewAll = n & pg = 1 & cmPathInfo = null

     ...however, the stars, ratings, and comments are not there.  The picture/s of the shirt are there, as well as the size, color, add to bag, etc.
      On Amazon, I can see the ratings and comments.  This tends to be a problem with clothes companies and their customer service has not been able to tell me why I can't see what should be there.  Internet Explorer Does show the missing info; I haven't tried Chrome.  I want to work with Firefox.  Any suggestions?
  

  On the first page, next to the marking of Word, I get five sailboats (blue is good, gray is not good). This image comes from the external site "landsend.ugc.bazaarvoice.com." You can see the images if you load them directly? Here is an example: http://landsend.ugc.bazaarvoice.com/2008/2_8/5/rating.gif

  When I click through to the pants, the first image that shows on the left is this one: http://s7.landsend.com/is/image/Lands.../426850_AJ13_FF_KHA?fmt=jpeg, rgb, qlt = 80, 1 & op_sharpen = 0 & resMode = sharp2 & op_usm = 0.5, 1, 3, 0, & icc=sRGB%20IEC61966-2.1,relative & iccEmbed = 1 & rgn = 0, 0, 2000, 3000 & scl = 5.882352941176471. If you click on it directly, it works?

  If you are unable to view these images directly, sites can be blocked. Check out the first section of this article: the problems that cause to not show images.

  If you CAN not display these images directly, but not when they are incorporated on the main site of Lands End, you may be blocked "third party" images. You can check here:

  (1) in a new tab, type or paste Subject: config in the address bar and press ENTER. Click on the button promising to be careful.

  (2) in the filter box, type or paste perm and make a pause so that the list is filtered

  (3) if the value is not 1 (and the line is in bold), click permissions.default.image , then click Reset.

  If the above fails, it could be a problem to Add on. Could you try Mode without failure of Firefox? It is a standard diagnostic tool in order to avoid interference by extensions (and some custom settings). More info: questions to troubleshoot Firefox in Safe Mode.

  You can restart Firefox in Mode safe help

  Help > restart with disabled modules

  In the dialog box, click on 'Start mode safe' (not Reset)

  Any difference?

• How can I activate Firefox redirect to another part of the site that I use regularly without asking permission

  I use a site about 2 or 3 times a week. After registration on the site, it should redirect me to another page but always request my permission to allow.
  In tools, Options where it allows me to give automatic approval to be redirected. Otherwise, I'm sitting watching the screen waiting for him to change, having not noticed ther bar at the top of the page, pending!
  Thank you

  Is there a way to allow the page redirect specific areas? For example, by using a trust list?
  There are a few sites that I use always demanding redirect, for example after the connection, but I don't want to allow redirection to any site.

• Interesting CRYPTO ipsec traffic - need some understanding

  Hi friends,

  I need your help to understand the works of tunnel passing crypto ipsec. It is always said that valuable traffic to the times needs to be mirror config. Now my doubt is if I add a host of 10.10.10.10/32 entry at one end and add an entry for network 10.10.10.0/24 to the other end, it will work? If it's not there? According to the logic that this host 10.10.10.10 has work I am rite? Sometimes back I met this senario where part of the IP'S work and other is... ". After checking the config we experienced that one side has been added to it like 24 and another there are 25.

  Ipsec tunnel will exchange their interesting traffic ACL acoss each other what phase 2 is coming? What happens if I add the above said 10.10.10.10 stuff in tunnel work already... It will cause any problem?

  Awaiting your response

  Thanks & best regards,

  Kamal

  The simple answer to your question is Yes, a entity 32 on one side of the tunnel should work if the network is defined as a 24 on both sides. This isn't like a list of prefixes or routing protocol dynamic where subnet masks must match. Statements of network in the passage from Phase 2 of the IPSEC tunnel (which defines which traffic runs through the tunnel) are defined through ACL, so as long as the traffic meets the criteria of the ACL, then go above the tunnel. That being said, your tunnel of phase 2 should have never been created in your 24 & 25 example because network statements not matching - it's weird. Maybe your tunnels put in correspondence, but you exclude some of the traffic to be NAT'ed?

  As you we, however, portions of the phase 2 of the tunnel (aka security association) must be mirror images. If you use two ASAs then you can simply reverse ACL source and destination. If you make the ASA for say, a netscreen, it may be a little more complex depending on whether you're doing road or political from ipsec on this side there. If you can't get the 32 device work for some reason, you can also create another specific to this traffic safety association.

• ASA Site, Remote Site cannot access DMZ to the Hub site

  So I've been scratching my head and I just can't visualize what I what and how I want to do.

  Here is the overview of my network:

  Headquarters: ASA 5505

  Site1: ASA 5505

  Site2: ASA 5505

  Training3: ASA 5505

  All Sites are connected L2L to the location of the Headquarters with VPN Site to Site.

  Since the HQ site I can ping each location by satellite, and each satellite location I can ping the HQ site. I will also mention that all other traffic is also correctly.

  Here's my number: HQ site, I have a DMZ set up with a web/mail server. This mail/web server is accessible from my HQ LAN, but not from the satellite location. I need allow that.

  What should I do?

  My second question is that I want for satellite sites to see networks of eachother. I should create a VPN network between sites, or can this be solved in the same way that the question of the DMZ?

  I enclose the show run from my ASA HQ

  See the race HQ ASA

  For the mail/web server that requires access on the remote site VPN tunnels, you must add the servers to the acl crypto, similar to the way you have it for network access. Make sure that both parties have the ACL in mirror. If you're natting from the DMZ to the outside, make sure you create an exemption from nat from the dmz to the outside for VPN traffic.

  For the second question, because you have only three sites, I would recommend creating a tunnel from site to site between two satellite sites.

  HTH

  PS. If you found this post useful, please note it.

• Easy traffic between remote sites via Cisco VPN

  We have a Cisco 2921 router at Headquarters (Easy VPN Server) and deployed Cisco 887VA (EasyVPN - Extension of remote network) for remote offices using EasyVPN. We allow voice traffic and data via VPN.  Everything has been great to work until this problem has been discovered today:

  When a remote user behind Cisco 887VA calls another remote user also behind Cisco 887VA, the call connects and Avaya IP phone rings but no voice in both feel.

  Calls from Headquarters and external mobile/fixed are very good. Only calls between two remote sites are affected.

  There is no need for DATA connection between the remote desktop, our only concern is the voice.

  By the looks of it, I think that "hair - pinning" traffic on the interface VPN is necessary. But need some advice on the configuration. (Examples configs etc.).

  Thanks in advance.

  Thanks for your quick response.

  I am sorry, I assumed that the clients have been configured in client mode.

  No need to remove the SDM_POOL_1, given that customers already have configured NEM.

  But add:

  Configuration group customer isakmp crypto CliniEasyVPN

  network extension mode

  You are able to ping to talked to the other?

  Please make this change:

  105 extended IP access list

  Licensing ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255

  * Of course free to do trafficking of translated on the shelves.

  Let me know if you have any questions.

  Thank you.

  Portu.

• US Army hub sites

  Recently we have begun to install the most recent C for U.S. Army Series codecs. But we have some issues that we need to know if it is on other DOD sites.

  1 using the module connection ISDN we have problems connecting to the hub DVS - G sites, given that Cisco did not include the audio G.728 standard in the software Link. So we can not auto negotiate with sites of DVS - G that use only the G.728 (Yes, hard to believe that the two sides, but true)

  2. We also have problems with the fact that you can configure easily fixed series C to an audio or video standards using the remote control or the web interface. I understand that you can do in telnet and using the experimental section, but they do not publish the API for this feature.

  Someone else has these problems and find a solution?

  You can email me directly at

  [email protected] / * /.

  Thank you

  If you are using a version more recent dirmware (IE TC6.2) on your terminals the C series, you can set the filter capset(2) through the web interface (in the experimental section) as well as via telnet/ssh.  There are some quick info on the use of the https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-16106filter.