Static Nat issue unable to resolve everything tried.

Similar Questions

• Im trying to open the tutorial of 23 minutes on how to use different tools in photoshop and it continues to come with unable to resolve the DNS servers worked fine yesterday? Ive had creative cloud on my laptop for a week and still have not been able t

  Im trying to open the tutorial of 23 minutes on how to use different tools in photoshop and it continues to come with unable to resolve the DNS servers worked fine yesterday? Ive had creative cloud on my laptop for a week and not yet able to get past the basics make me very frustrated.

  I guess you meant the links when you open photoshop CC. I tested all four videos of the 23 min tutorial and they all played fine. If something between you and adobe does not work correctly.

  • Check that your firewall is blocking the net. Try to access youtube videos and see if they play very well
  • Go to the adobe tv site and try to play one of the videos here. Adobe TV
  • If youtube plays very well and adobe tv does not work, next is to check if you have flash installed. Some videos require flash, others are html 5. Sorry that I could not confirm what player has been used for this tutorial. I think that html 5 but not sure.
  • Next is to look at the properties of your browser and check multimedia settings are not disabled if it y in a. (this is totally dependent on the browser)

  If none of this helps, let us know.

• Dual active/passive failover of ISP with static Nat on Cisco 1941

  Hello world

  I'm working on a configuration of a client and I have everything in place right now except the NAT' static ing.  The config fails during an ISP to another and track als and routes by default static weighted, the PAT rocking with course to each interface maps.  It is, is it possible to switch on the large amount of static NAT entries to the ISP of backup?  So far, everything I've read said no because you can have only one entry per ip/port combo, other than another configuration static NAT double server with a different IP address.  I just want to be sure before making my recommendations, all thoughts are greatly appreciated.

  Thank you

  Brandon

  In fact, you can also long as you use standard NAT ("ip nat inside source static") or not NVI ('ip nat static source') for your attackers. You apply the roadmap by the end of the static NAT statement to indicate which interface it should apply to. So, if you have something like this:

   ip access-list extended ACL_NAT permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 any ! route-map RM_NAT_ISP1 match ip address ACL_NAT match interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ! route-map RM_NAT_ISP2 match ip address ACL_NAT match interface GigabitEthernet0/2 

  Using port 80/tcp for example, you can do this:

   ip nat inside source static tcp x.x.x.x 80 y.y.y.y 80 route-map RM_NAT_ISP1 ip nat inside source static tcp x.x.x.x 80 z.z.z.z 80 route-map RM_NAT_ISP2 

  Just replace x.x.x.x with the LAN address of the machine that you are shipping y.y.y.y with the WAN address you are shipping on isps1 and z.z.z.z with the address of the ISP WAN you are shipping on ISP2. The static NAT will be conditional on the roadmap, at this point.

  This works with TCP, UDP, and IP forwarding, but does not require that you use an IPv4 address to your WAN address. For some reason, it does not work if you use an interface... so if you're using dynamic addresses, it will be more complicated.

• Static NAT with asa 5520

  Hi all

  I have the following situation

  The following rules of the static nat

  static (inside, outside) tcp 200.200.200.200 80 10.0.0.200 80 netmask 255.255.255.255

  static (inside, outside) 200.200.200.200 tcp 8080 10.0.0.200 80 netmask 255.255.255.255

  I would redirect all packets destined for port 8080 and 80 IP address 200.200.200.200,

  to the private IP address on port 80 10.0.0.200.

  I tried to do that the ASA said there is already a rule, there is a way it be done?

  Kind regards.

  I don't think you can use port forwarding using the same local destination IP on port 80 in this way, fw will give you duplicate static entries.

  You can however get around and give 10.0.0.200 NIC a secondary IP address i.e. 10.0.0.201 and make electricity as follows.

  static (inside, outside) tcp 200.200.200.200 www 8080 10.0.0.201 netmask 255.255.255.255

  static (inside, outside) tcp 200.200.200.200 80 10.0.0.200 80 netmask 255.255.255.255

  See examples of port forwarding

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a00804708b4.shtml

  concerning

• Cisco IOS - how config static nat to NAT on the VPN

  Hello world

  I need help.

  I configured a VPN site-to site between two routers IOS. One of the routers already had a static NAT (172.16.100.1 inside to the public IP address), but this static NAT prevents remote VPN hosts access to the 172.16.100.1 home as it tries to the response to public IP NAT router configured.

  Does anyone know how to use static NAT for the inside to the outside, but don't not NAT inside to outside VPN traffic?

  I know how to make using a roadmap for "overload" dynamic NAT, but I can't? t see how you can use a roadmap on the static NAT statement.

  You can provide any help would be appreciated.

  Chris

  Hi Chris

  Take a look at the document atatched with gives a few examples of the very thing you are trying to do.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/SW/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feature_guide09186a0080087bac.html

  HTH

  Jon

• Public static political static NAT in conflict with NAT VPN

  I have a situation where I need to create a VPN site-to site between an ASA 5505 using IOS 7.2 and a Sonicwall NSA4500. The problem arises where the LAN behind the Cisco ASA has the same subnet an existing VPN currently created on the Sonicwall. Since the Sonicwall cannot have two VPN both run on the same subnet, the solution is to use policy NAT on the SAA as well as for the Sonicwall, the new VPN seems to have a different subnet.

  The current subnet behind the ASA is 192.168.10.0/24 (The Sonicwall already has a private network virtual created for another customer with the same subnet). I try to translate it to 192.168.24.0/24. The peer LAN (behind the Sonicwall) is 10.159.0.0/24. The ASA relevant configuration is:

  interface Vlan1

  IP 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0

  access extensive list ip 192.168.24.0 outside_1_cryptomap allow 255.255.255.0 10.159.0.0 255.255.255.0

  list of access VPN extended permit ip 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.159.0.0 255.255.255.0

  public static 192.168.24.0 (inside, outside) - list of VPN access

  card crypto outside_map 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap

  In addition, there are other static NAT instructions and their associated ACLs that allow certain traffic through the firewall on the server, for example:

  public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface smtp SERVER smtp netmask 255.255.255.255

  The problem is this: when I enter the static strategy statement NAT, I get the message ' WARNING: real-address conflict with existing static "and then it refers to each of the static NAT statements reflecting the external address to the server. I've thought about it, and it seemed to me that the problem was that policy NAT statement must be the first statement of NAT (it is the last one) so that it is run first and all traffic destined to the VPN to the Sonicwall (destination 10.159.0.0/24) tunnel would be properly treated. If I left him as the last statement, then the other static NAT statements would prevent a part of the 10.159.0.0/24 network-bound traffic to be correctly routed through the VPN.

  So, I tried first to my stated policy NAT upward in the ASDM GUI interface. However, moving the declaration was not allowed. Then I tried to delete the five static NAT statements that point to the server (an example is above) and then recreate them, hoping that would then move up the policy statement NAT. This also failed.

  What Miss me?

  Hello

  I assumed that we could have changed the order of the 'static' , the original orders, but as it did not work for some reason any then it seems to me that you suggested or change, that I proposed should work.

  I guess that your purpose was to set up static political PAT for the VPN for some these services, then static PAT of public network access, then static NAT to policy for the rest of the network in-house.

  I guess you could choose any way seems best for you.

  Let me know if get you it working. I always find it strange that the original configuration did not work.

  Remember to mark a reply as the answer if it answered your question.

  Feel free to ask more if necessary

  -Jouni

• ASA 5500 and static NAT 1-to-1

  We currently have a pair of s ASA 5500 failover providing firewall & nat with inside, outside and the dmz interfaces. We do PAT interface for most of the internal to the external and static connections 1-to-1 NAT for specific hosts that need to accept connections from the outside inside. The space of the static nat is a 27 which includes the address of the external interface. It's that everything is working properly.

  However, we are out of space for the static NAT to this/27. I would like to be able to add a different network, probably another 27, for the more static NAT but I'm a hard time to find the best way to do it. Is this possible with a network that does not include the external interface on the ASA?

  Here are some of our current NAT config:

  Global interface 10 (external)

  NAT (inside) 10 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  (dmz1, outside) static dmz1-net-net dmz1 netmask 255.255.255.224

  static (inside, dmz1) 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0

  static (inside, dmz1) 10.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0

  static (inside, outside) xx.yy.164.15 192.168.98.46 netmask 255.255.255.255

  static (inside, outside) xx.yy.164.8 192.168.98.47 netmask 255.255.255.255

  static (inside, outside) xx.yy.164.14 192.168.98.48 netmask 255.255.255.255

  static (inside, outside) xx.yy.164.13 192.168.101.50 netmask 255.255.255.255

  Thank you very much...

  Hello

  The correct syntax for the proxyarp activation will be

  No outside sysopt noproxyarp

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_command_reference_chapter09186a00805fb9e9.html#wp1111405

• Cannot ping via the VPN client host when static NAT translations are used

  Hello, I have a SRI 3825 configured for Cisco VPN client access.

  There are also several hosts on the internal network of the static NAT translations have a services facing outwards.

  Everything works as expected with the exception that I cannot ping hosts on the internal network once connected via VPN client that is internal IP addresses have the static NAT translations in external public addresses, I ping any host that does not have static NAT translation.

  For example, in the example below, I cannot ping 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2, but I can ping to the internal interface of the router, and any other host on the LAN, I can ping all hosts in the router itself.

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Concerning

  !

  session of crypto consignment

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  !

  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group vpnclient

  key S3Cu4Ke!

  DNS 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2

  domain domain.com

  pool dhcppool

  ACL 198

  Save-password

  PFS

  netmask 255.255.255.0

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set-SECURE 3DES esp-3des esp-sha-hmac

  !

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

  86400 seconds, life of security association set

  game of transformation-3DES-SECURE

  market arriere-route

  !

  card crypto client cryptomap of authentication list drauthen

  card crypto isakmp authorization list drauthor cryptomap

  client configuration address card crypto cryptomap answer

  map cryptomap 65535-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynmap

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  NAT outside IP

  IP 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.240

  cryptomap card crypto

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/1

  IP 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0

  IP nat inside

  !

  IP local pool dhcppool 192.168.2.50 192.168.2.100

  !

  Note access-list 198 * Split Tunnel encrypted traffic *.
  access-list 198 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255

  !
  Note access-list 199 * NAT0 ACL *.
  access-list 199 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
  access-list 199 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

  !

  Sheep allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 199

  !
  IP nat inside source map route sheep interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload

  !

  IP nat inside source static 192.168.1.1 1.2.3.5
  IP nat inside source static 192.168.1.2 1.2.3.6

  The problem seems to be that static NAT take your nat exemption.

  The solution would be:

  IP nat inside source static 192.168.1.1 1.2.3.5 sheep map route
  IP nat inside source static 192.168.1.2 1.2.3.6 sheep map route

  HTH

  Herbert

• Static NAT problem with PIX501

  Hi all

  We have problems with our PIX firewall. We have configured PIX 501 with static NAT for our Web server. Here's the running configuration.

  6.3 (4) version PIX

  interface ethernet0 car

  interface ethernet1 100full

  ethernet0 nameif outside security0

  nameif ethernet1 inside the security100

  pixfirewall hostname

  domain ciscopix.com

  fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512

  fixup protocol ftp 21

  fixup protocol h323 h225 1720

  fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719

  fixup protocol http 80

  fixup protocol rsh 514

  fixup protocol rtsp 554

  fixup protocol sip 5060

  fixup protocol sip udp 5060

  fixup protocol 2000 skinny

  fixup protocol smtp 25

  fixup protocol sqlnet 1521

  fixup protocol tftp 69

  names of

  access-list 101 permit tcp any host x.x.x.26 eq www

  access-list 101 permit tcp any host x.x.x.26 EQ field

  access-list 101 permit udp any host x.x.x.26 EQ field

  pager lines 24

  Outside 1500 MTU

  Within 1500 MTU

  IP address outside x.x.x.28 255.255.255.248

  IP address inside 192.168.90.1 255.255.255.0

  alarm action IP verification of information

  alarm action attack IP audit

  location of PDM 192.168.90.0 255.255.255.0 inside

  history of PDM activate

  ARP timeout 14400

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  static (inside, outside) x.x.x.26 192.168.90.3 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  Access-group 101 in external interface

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.25 1

  Route inside 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.90.2 1

  Timeout xlate 03:00

  Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225

  H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00

  Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute

  GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server

  AAA-server GANYMEDE + 3 max-failed-attempts

  AAA-server GANYMEDE + deadtime 10

  RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server

  AAA-server RADIUS 3 max-failed-attempts

  AAA-RADIUS deadtime 10 Server

  AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol

  Enable http server

  http 192.168.90.0 255.255.255.0 inside

  No snmp server location

  No snmp Server contact

  SNMP-Server Community public

  No trap to activate snmp Server

  enable floodguard

  Telnet timeout 5

  SSH timeout 5

  Console timeout 0

  Terminal width 80

  : end

  the problem is the configuration, we are unable to access the web server both inside and outside the network.

  All input will be greatly appreciated.

  Kind regards

  udimpas

  activate icmp backtrace and then ping the x.x.x.26 of the internet. the output should be as below:

  3363574:-out ICMP echo request: ID = 21834 seq = 1202 length = 80

  3363575: ICMP echo request: external untranslating: inside: 192.168.90.3

  3363576: ICMP echo-reply from the inside: 192.168.90.3 ID = 21834 seq = 1202 length = 80

  3363577: response to ICMP echo -: translate inside: 192.168.90.3 out:

  by doing this, you can 1. Check the nat 2. If the server responds to the internet.

  do not forget to allow incoming icmp:

  access-l 101 permit icmp any one

• 2 static NAT on the same Interface

  I have an ASA 5510 (8.2 (5)) and I'm trying to set up a VPN site-to site of one of our suppliers.  The problem I am running into is that they want me NAT one specific to one of our servers private IP, and this server already has a static NAT from the outside of a demilitarized zone.  It's the current rule NAT:

  static (DMZ1, external) 65.43.x.x 10.0.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.255

  and they want card me 172.28.9.42 on the same server, so I tried to add:

  (DMZ1, external) 172.28.9.42 static 10.0.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.255

  but can not because it's a double translation.

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Hello

  It seems to me you must configure a static NAT to politics

  Configurations would be as follows

  DMZ-POLICY-NAT of ip 10.0.0.3 host allowed access list

  (DMZ1, external) 172.28.9.42 static access-list DMZ-POLICY-NAT

  Regarding configurations

  • Name of the ACL can be naturally you want
  • Destination network can be a single host if necessary IP address
  • You should be able to configure multiple lines if necessary

  Note that you need to have this NAT configuration before the real public IP address command static NAT. You need to remove the existing static NAT to configure the above and add the original.

  This is because if you do not configure static NAT of politics first in the configuration, all traffic will keep hitting the normal rule of the static NAT for the public IP address.

  -Jouni

• PIX 501 PPPoE w / static NAT loss of connectivity

  I have a {should} installation very simple. PIX 501 with PPPoE on the external interface, 3 inside customers using PAT and 1 inside the client I am trying to use an address mapping static on permit communications with this host from the outside using a particular service. I did a lot of these before where there was an ADSL router in front of the PIX, but this is the first where I've used the PIX as the PPPoE client. When I use the static NAT for the single host it loses all connectivity beyond the PIX outside interface. When I get rid of the static mapping, through PAT very well. I spent many hours troubleshooting and control a lot of obvious things, but I am at a loss right now... unless it could be a problem with the IP address that has been assigned by the ISP for use with static NAT. Any thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you

  Sorry, in your case that static would look like this because of the dynamic IP.

  static (inside, outside) 23 interface 10.1.1.1 23 netmask 255.255.255.255

  Daniel

• VPN with static nat for a whole subnet

  Hey there,

  For some reason, I can't do this on the router. Errrr...

  I'm trying to config a static nat (many to one), which will be in effect only when traffic needs to go on our vpn tunnel to the remote location.

  example:

  internal LAN 192.168.0.0

  remote network: 10.10.10.0 and 10.10.15.0

  When traffic passes over the tunnel vpn - at the remote site, I need to translate my internal network (192.168.0.0) to an ip address 172.16.32.65 static

  any ideas?

  also on my crypto map ACL, which must be specified for interesting traffic? my local network or static ip address search?

  Let me know your thoughts on the matter.

  Kind regards

  R.

  NAT you describe is named PAT or overload, at least in terms of Ciscos...

  What you need:

  (1) a NAT - ACL when you describe your traffic which should be natted.

  (2) a nat pool with your 172.16.32.65 address

  (3) a statement-NAT for dynamic NAT inside based on the ACL for the pool

  Here are some examples:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/ipaddr/configuration/guide/iadnat_addr_consv_ps10591_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1073436

  Your crypto ACL then referred to the NATted IP as NAT happens before encryption.

• Get message unable to load XPCOM trying to start applications

  Original title: unable to load XPCOM

  I get the message "Unable to load XPCOM" on several applications and they launch.  Couldn't find anything on this site to help on this.  Anyone know the fix?

  Hello

  Thanks to join Microsoft Community where you will find all the required information on the Windows operating systems!

  You get message unable to load XPCOM trying to run some applications.

  XPCOM is Mozilla-related.

  To work with the issue, I suggest to uninstall Mozilla Firefox and check if the problem persists.

  To uninstall a program:

  a. press the Windows key + W

  b. now, select applications if it is not selected

  Hit and c. Type appwiz.cpl enter and uninstall the program from the list.

  If the issue is not persistent, then to work with the issue, I suggest you to post a query in the Mozilla support forum.

  You could try to get assistance for the Mozilla support forum:

  http://support.Mozilla.org/en-us/KB/get-community-support

  For any question related to Windows, feel free to contact us.

• Static NAT configuration

  I have VMWare with Windows 2012 R2 VM installation.  I am installing the VM to have a static NAT (DHCP disabled) address and connect to the internet.  I can't understand why it doesn't work for me.  The virtual computer can connect to the internet fine with DHCP active, but once I change to static, using the same IP addresses, it stops working.

  I have modified the virtual network Editor to use a specific subnet and disabled DHCP

  

  Changed the settings for the TCP/IPv4 virtual machine to use a static address

  

  The only thing I noticed is that the host NIC for VMnet8 continues to change its configuration to default.  Even if I change it to the new subnet that he shouldn't come back to 192.168.21.0.

  I tried many different types of configurations, but I can't understand exactly what I'm doing wrong!  This guide of VNE was not very helpful and many other resources did not help much either.

  try to manually configure DNS settings in advanced NAT settings option and check again

• Impossible to mount any NFS data store: unable to resolve host name '< obsolete Server > '.

  Hello

  On a particular ESXi server, whenever I try to mount any NFS data store, I get this error message:

  Call "HostDatastoreSystem.CreateNasDatastore" of object "ha-datastoresystem" on ESXi '172.22.216.64' failed.
  Operation failed, the diagnostic report: unable to resolve host name 'cosmo '.

  Always mention hostname 'cosmo', no matter what server I'm actually trying to mount. 172.22.216.64 is the exact address of the ESXi server.

  'cosmo' was the former name of a desktop linux machine, several months ago has re-installed and renamed in the process. So 'cosmo' is no more and it's just expected that 'cosmo' cannot be resolved. However, the error message mentioning 'cosmo' occurs regardless of what server I try to mount a NFS datastore of. I can't find any references to 'cosmo' in the ESXi server configuration in the vSphere client (although I don't know exactly where to look). I remember that at one point, a NFS datastore was mounted temporarily to 'cosmo' to host the ISO debug files. But no more.

  I tried this same sharing of an another ESXi (running the same version of ESXi) mounted in the same subnet (works great), and I also tried to mount a new NFS share on a server where the ESXi already had another NFS data store mounted from the same server (the data store already mounted works fine (, but attempts to connect to a new data store on the same failed server mentioning the independent 'cosmo' server as mentioned above). I tried to restart the ESXi server, but the problem persists after restarting.

  I'm under vSphere client 5.0.0 Build 455964 and ESXi 5.0.0 - 469512-standard with the free license. Because of the free license (I think), I don't have SSH access on the server. (Is that right?)

  How to work around the error message mentioning the obsolete server 'cosmo '? The only thing I can think of right now is to move all data from the local data store to a store of data already mounted, reinstall the ESXi server and give all the data. I'm hoping for a simpler solution! :-)

  Peter

  Can you confirm if this solution works for you?