Switch SF300

Similar Questions

• rrack mounting brackets for Cisco switch SF300 - 48P?

  Does anyone know how to get grid mounting brackets for switch Cisco SF300 - 48P?

  You might be able to get them through the support of Cisco.  Check this thread: https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11201291/sf-300-series-rack-m...

• Linking the two switches SF300-8 and gvrp

  After passing the age trying to propagate VLAN one SF300 to another, I think that I finally did it.  It seems that we must implement the GVRP Protocol on both sides of the trunk AND manually create the VLAN on the slave switch.  Now I can ping machines on the two switches that share the same VLAN successfully.

  However; If I try and ping a machine on the passage of the slave from outside in the VLAN, which is a connection routed the master switch, it fails, succeeds the ping of a machine on the main switch.

  What I am doing wrong?

  Hi Nigel, GVRP is basically a terrible (and useless) Protocol.

  GVRP not to dispose of anything, unless it is predefined to what it can affect, the manually fresh General requirements is greater than the configuration comes actually port.

  Configuring you mentioned basically tells me that you built manually the trunk as vlan 1 UNTAG, tag 11 and 42. The GVRP Protocol should do it for you if it is properly implemented.

  To work successfully the port GVRP must send the GVRP join messages, the interface of the receiver must be configured to receive the join messages and then the database of VLAN switch advertising must have these VLANS constructed/defined manually as they are underway in the messages...

  If you need using the configuration, do not hesitate to post what is your goal, I'm sure I or someone can help you if you provide a network, the schema and configuration files.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Switch SF300 trunk with a 3750

  Is it possible to stem a SF300 switch with a 3750 switch?  If so, how?  Whenever I turn on the 3750 trunking port I lose connection to the SF300.

  I'd appreciate any help, thank you

  Larnel

  Hi Larnel,

  You can do so by setting the 3750 for 802. 1 q ecapsulation on the trunk port, set it vlan native and wait for VLAN throughout. On the SF300, you must run the same process create the trunk port, enable the VLAN and set the PVID to match the VLAN native on the 3750 trunk interface. To do this, you will need from your VLAN pre-configured on both switches. Hope this helps you.

  Kevin

• I have configured Link Aggregation on two Switch SF300

  The two links connect to both switches via two radios. The problem is that I can't access the attached radios http interface:

  radio_on_aggregation.PNG

  

  Everything else works fine and the radios are passing data according to PRTG monitoring of the towed gear

  Thank you

  Well, it looks like this is it.
  She looks like that ever, you can manage your bridges because of this.

  This is due to the notion of the Association and its operation
  L3 from the IP address of bridge management package can never be process as the etherchannel does not recognize. He treats only packets from his peers, etherchannel port in the etherchannel port.

  Overall, you cannot manage your bridges, to put it simply

• There is a maximum amount of hosts for Cisco SF300?

  Hello world

  I m using a Cisco (SRW224G4P) SF300 in my network and I m using Vlan´s.

  I m a lot of loss of packet´s in the network and the users are facing in the absence of performance.

  There are altogether seven switch´s in the network, 6 SF200 Cisco as 'access' switch´s and 1 Cisco SF300 as the 'core' switch.

  It has almost 170 devices connected to the network, mainly IP cameras, other devices are the DVR´s and the NVR´s, a server a certain stand-alone.

  Thing is I m, including the loss of packet´s, and I found this alarm in the SF300:

  2147480831 2012-Jul-06 13:14:45 % of IPFFT-W-SFFTREDYELLOW warning: IP SFFT Table Overflow, aggregated (1)

  2147480831 2012-Jul-06 13:14:45 % IPFFT-W-SFFTREDYELLOW WARNING: IP SFFT Table Overflow

  Some people say this switch (SF300) support´s only 100 guests and that s why I m get this alarm and lose packets.

  But I can't find the limit of host´s in the specification of the switch in any document from Cisco.

  Think you on this?

  There is a limit of 100 guests for this switch?

  Thanks in advance!

  Carlos

  Hi Calavalle, the module layer 3 can only the hardware switch 100 until it starts to change software. The switch can support up to 510 IP addresses but anything over 100 have wait performance degradation.

  -Tom
  Please evaluate the useful messages

• Small business SF300 waterfall

  Hello

  I have 4 switches SF300, I need cascade together but the user guides do not appear to cover the physical aspects of the waterfall was cheating him.

  Here's what I was going to maybe someone could check the installation or me to benefit from their experience.

  SW1 (port GB2)--> SW2 (port GB1)

  SW2 (port GB2)--> SW3 (port GB1)

  SW3 (port GB2)--> SW4 (port GB1)

  SW3 (port GB2)--> (port GB1) SW1 - loopback for redundancy of cascade cable.

  Is that what that sounds right?

  After the first use Setup will be changed to place the switches 3 and 4 in a factory, date at which we will then use the GBIC connectors and fiber to connect SW2 SW3, and then back to SW1-SW4.

  Thanks in advance for the help.

  Gary

  Hello Gary,.

  The connection you described works well for these switches. It allows for up and down traffic to use the ports in concert but also to provide redundancy.

• SF300-48 - I want to have two VLANS communicate

  I want to segment our users our wireline users wireless and I bought this switch in the hope to be able to do.

  How can I do this?

  I've already put the mode switch to layer 3.

  I created the second VIRTUAL LAN and assigned it and IP.  How can I get the VLAN wireless talking to data VLAN?

  Thank you!

  Hi Scott,.

  Your only sends me a part of the story, but we move forward another step and add a static route to the WAN router...

  A network diagram, even done with paint would be fantastic to understand the topology of your network.

  So no history full of how the network is set up, I have to work on assumptions.

  PC in the 10.1.32.0 network used the WAN router as the default gateway. You put the default gateway address of VLAN1 and VLAN2, IP switches, according to which VLAN the PC is.

  I would like to work on the assumption that the address IP of VLAN1 to the SF300 switch is 10.1.32.100

  step 1. Put the PC in VLAN1 back if its default gateway is 10.1.32.1.

  step 2.  Add a static route that is appropriate in your WAN router so that it knows how to send traffic to VLAN2

  It could be something like, and I'll cite the statement of the itinerary which must reside in your WAN router.

  To get to 10.20.32.0 network with a mask of 255.255.255.0 Gateway 10.1.32.100 (IP address of vlan1 on the SF300.)

  This should then hosts of PC in VLAN1 and the router to learn how to get traffic to VLAN2.  the router will redirect traffic to the switch SF300 and he has a way to interface to VLAN2, so he certainly knows how to get to VLAN2 IP packets.

  If the WAN router knows where VLAN2, go via the SF300 switch, then he might be able to the Internet of NAT traffic then this second VIRTUAL local network.

  We are not finished here, more is yet to happen, such as the DNS and DHCP resolution for hosts in VLAN2 and possible NAT problems according to the capabilities of your WAN router.

  Best regards, Dave

• The managed behind router switch remote access?

  What is the best way to access remotely to a switch behind a router?  I will use a switch SF300, and there is no server.

  For points of access (PA) behind a router, I give each a diffferent LAN address and port number.  In router I have forward TCP traffic with the single port/LAN IP.  Then using the port numbers with the address of the static router, the browser can remote access to the router or the attached AP.  But where do I put the managed switch LAN port number?  Assume default is port 80 and I would change to 8001 to switch #1; 8002 to switch #2; etc.  Could not find this info in the manual of configurtion.

  Hello

  At this point, I would recommend a call to the Cisco Small Business Centre at 1-866-606-1866 support so that action can be taken and your configuration can be reviewed.

  I have reproduced the concern here and I am able to remotely manage my switch SF300 with an RV082 as the router.

  My rule in the RV082 are as follows:

  Creating a custom topic UPnP service.  Create SF300 application name (it is a basic text field and can be any name), 8001 an external port and internal port 80.  I send to the address IP internal SF300 switch and click the check box.  From there on, I select Add to the list.  Once it appears in my list, I then click Save settings at the bottom of the page.

  Thank you!

  Dave

• stopped working for some backup devices

  I installed 6 switches SF300 - 24 p and gave them IP addresses static admin.  Initially, they are automatically recognized by ON100 and had the device driver and icon, etc.  They were also back up files of config based on credentials, that I gave to the web port 80 access.  I could even push the new firmware for them.

  I struggled with the switches and they were restarting several times a day, so I upgraded and plant their default and reprogrammed by hand.  Same configs, same IP address, etc.  I rediscover the edge network and we found them once again and I got the credentials, but now the backup for all 6 switches button is gray and they aren't automatically backup OU configs.

  I don't know what else to try to get these working properly again.

  Hi Brandon,.

  You can check if you have enabled "SNMP Service" on the switch? It's under ' Services TCP/UDP ", see below:

  

  If SNMP is enabled on the device, then OnPlus must use SNMP to communicate with the device. If this option is enabled, you can disable SNMP, or to provide information for the identification of SNMP.

  SF300 Notes:

  Note that if SNMP is enabled on the device, OnPlus must must use SNMP to communicate with the device.

  This can also lies in the Guide of the user, page 240:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/net_mgmt/other_net_mgmt/onplus/Portal/user_guide/onplus_portal_user_guide_7820144.PDF

  If SNMP is not enabled, send me the name of the site, and I can collect additional troubleshooting site logs.

  Thank you

  The OnPlus team

• Material selection/setup help

  I am helping to set up a network in their new premises and want to see if my choice of equipment is correct.  The products of the small business suite seemed to meet our needs better I could say. There are a dizzying number of products to choose from. I did my best.

  Here are the conditions:

  1 need a point of access wireless to manage a connection to Internet only and a connection used to network services Corp. and Internet.

  2. they have two buildings with a fiber multimode link between them.

  3. each building will have security camera with PoE.

  4. remote access to all the VLANS in the buildings (except comments)

  a. PCAnywhere on VLAN30 PC security

  b. file services on VLAN20

  5. all the VLANS need to access to the internet.  I guess the Mgmt VLAN40 wouldn't need it.

  I had planned to purchase the following:

  WAP561 wireless - wanted both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz of spectrum

  Switch SF300 - 24 p - 1 for each building w / a module 1000Base-SX MGBSX1 for fiber link

  RV320 Router/VPN

  My first attempt to design was to create the VLAN following on all devices

  1 - default VLAN, VLAN native - nothing will use this

  10 - Guest, WAP only, NO cable connections

  20 - corp, WAP and wired

  30 - security, Wired only at this time

  40 - Mgmt, WAP and wired

  Circuits carrying all them VLAN will be used for the AP<->Switch1,

  Router<->Switch1 and Switch2 connections<->Switch1.

  I'm more concerned about the configuration of the router/VPN.

  Until we decide on adding VPN for the project that I thought it wouldn't be hard to do. Disable the Inter-VLAN routing, configure a DHCP pool for each VIRTUAL LAN and everyone stay out of each other. But then I opened my big mouth and asked if they wanted a remote access.

  So, what VPN configuration would allow us to do all the VLANS? PPTP would work better? There are Inter-VLAN routing? If I turn the routing Inter-VLAN would be that this means that might enjoy other VLAN? An access list will allow me to keep the guests of enjambment?

  Any glare issues anyone sees?

  Thank you.

  Mark

  Hi Mark, admittingly I'm not familiar with the new RV320 router or the new WAP. However, I can say that the basic set up should work as expected and you have correctly identified the remote access is the hitch.

  On the previous routers RV PPTP would be easier to get on the network. The real question is, the remote connection what resource t - it need access to? Certainly not a network of comments. In the past, if you wanted to PPTP intervlan communicate that you need to connect in one subnets defined and have the intervlan routing active the PPTP protocol.

  This provides a different scenario. Which means that this would require the access lists on the ports on the switch for the traffic of infiltration should be blocked access to unwanted resources. I don't know if the RV320 supports inter - vlan ACL, I know it has been introduced on the RV220w, but that may be another idea to fight against this concept.

  So I think that consideration for now is, who needs access to that as a remote connection?

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• SF 300

  Friend of Delmas

  I knocked in certain configuration of my network.  I have two switches sf300 and cisco router 827.  In fact sf300 supports dhcp server.  I took cisco 827 as dhcp server and I create 4 pools dhcp in it.

  How do I configure in sf300 to service dhcp of the router cisco 827.  ISIT possible to configure 827 with interface bvi, when I try, I got error below.  Can someone help me configure the bvi interface and I'll link this bvi to vlan on sf300.

  error in 827 router

  Router (config-subif) #bridge - Group 1

  The bypass on a subinterface LAN requires that the interface already
  configured encapsulation Inter Switch Link (ISL) or 802. 1 q encapsulation

  SF300 Configuration:

  Int vlan 1

  IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

  int vlan 2

  IP 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0

  int vlan 3

  address 192.168.3.1 IP 255.255.255.0

  int vlan 4

  192.168.4.1 IP address 255.255.255.0

  How can I connect two switch sf300 for redundancy?  I connected giga4 SW1 and SW2 giga4 mode trunk isit good or in any other way, I need to connect. ?

  Thanks in advance.

  Hi SIR,

  You must have the correctly configured DHCP relay

  Configure the terminal

  activate a dhcp IP Relay

  IP address of relay dhcp (DHCP server address)

  Info IP dhcp (option 82) option

  interface IG4

  activate a dhcp IP Relay

  The rest of your config seems fine for the switch.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• WAP200E SW 2960 POE

  I have a problem to connect my WAP200E to SW2960. What was my mistake?

  Both are POE. I only connect Wap200e to SW2960 and I check the 15.4watts, but I assumed that 200th WAP does not, because 200th WAP does not illuminate.

  I need to put in cultivated, or put a camera on to connect to SW2960 to the 2000th WAP.

  Can you help me, please?

  

  I tested a wap200e with a SB-PWR-INJ1 connection to the switch SF300, this fuelled the AP without problems

  

  -Tom
  Please evaluate the useful messages

• GAL/LACP with several VIRTUAL LANs

  Hello

  I have two switches SG-200-50. I created three VLANS on one and define the place of the other - there is no requirement for routing between VIRTUAL LANs. However, I want to trunk between local networks VIRTUAL using with LACP LAG. For example, A button 1-22 ports VLAN 1 and then 23-24 is the junction for this. 25-34 is VLAN2 and trunking is 35-36. VLAN 3 is 37-48 and 49-50 trunking. I seemed to be able to get 1 VLAN, the default, trunking but no VLAN 2.

  I have a few questions:

  1. the SG-200 will allow you to the trunk several VIRTUAL LANs for another switch?

  2. If so - how? I've lived the documentation and it does not mention explicitly "multiple" VLAN with DELAY.

  3 circuits is possible by a LAG (say 6 ports) happening all the VLANS on the switch?

  So the main question is that I want to achieve is possible on this switch. The reason why I'm doing it is of course of redundancy. Carrying one VLAN on both switches is preferable. I just need trunk correctly between them.

  See you soon! Any thoughts appreciated.

  Scott

  Hi Scott,.

  You had questions, which I copied in red. :

  1. the SG-200 will allow you to the trunk several VIRTUAL LANs for another switch?  Absolutely

  2. If so - how? I've lived the documentation and it does not mention explicitly "multiple" VLAN with DELAY.

  I have attached the Administrator's guide.  The OFFSET rules are defined at the bottom of page 82 of the attached document.

  The 200 series supports four lags, or in other words four groups aggregagted of links.

  3 circuits is possible by a LAG (say 6 ports) happening all the VLANS on the switch?  Yes as indicates it page 83 administrator guide.

  Assign up to eight ports active members to the static LAG.

  So the main question is that I want to achieve is possible on this switch. The reason why I'm doing it is of course of redundancy. Carrying one VLAN on both switches is preferable. I just need trunk correctly between them.

  Personally, I prefer to the trunk on gal differently, especially when you are trying only to achieve redundancy and higher aggregate bandwidth between switches.  It is also relevant to the 300 series as the product of the 300 series is just a richer product.

  You want; "I want to trunk between local networks VIRTUAL using with LACP LAG. For example, A button 1-22 ports VLAN 1 and then 23-24 is the junction for this. 25-34 is VLAN2 and trunking is 35-36. VLAN 3 is 37-48 and 49-50 trunking. It seemed to me be able to obtain VLAN 1, the default value, trunking but no VLAN 2. »

  What about using the ports numbers higher for the uplink between switches, I have no particular reason to use these ports except that they are on the right side of the switch.

  A B switch

  ports ports

  VLAN 1 1-24, 47-48 1-24, 47-48

  VLAN2 25-34, 25-34

  vlan3 35-46 35-46

  LAG ports 49-50 49-50

  The advantage of this is that now you have two ports of the traffic load balancing between switches of series two 200.  I could have more if I want, but I want to keep my simple example.

  Create a static OFFSET, by the sound of it you did already.

  I just used my 300 series switch (SF300 - 48P) as a demo, as I don't have a series 200 switch.  Configuration should be roughly about the same.  In my case, I have four ports GiG GE1 to GE4.  I will use GE1 and GE2 as my two members of a group LAG 1.  May sound a bit confusing, but follow below.

  Added two ports for the DELAY, note in the example below GE1 and GE2 are not connected to another switch, so they showup as ports of Eve;

  Also my 300 series switch supports eight groups of LAG, so captures the numbers 1 to 8 as shown in the following screen.

  

  Now that my LAG is created, you'll notice in the screenshot below that VLAN1 is added automatically to the LAG 1 as unmarked frames.

  Note: circled point, I selected LAG in this menu drop-down and then click Go.

  Note: 1 in the Red rectangular box represents GAL Group 1, which consists of GE1 and GE2

  

  Now, I add 2 VLAN group LAG 1 by selecting 2 VLAN selected then LAG and then click go, the following screen came.

  

  I clicked on the button marked radio in the rectangle above, to allow VLAN 2 send labeled on group GAL 1 ethernet frames.

  And so on for the other VLANS I migth.

  My methodology or train of thought, was to allow of vlan1 to just send frames unmarked on the Group LAG 1, but any other VLAN later is marked on the Group 1 GAL.

  You should be able to do exactly the same thing on the other switch 200 series.

  in my example, as I then simply take some CAT6 or CAT5e cables and connect GE1 on a 200 series switch to other Ge1 200 series

  I connect then GE2 on a 200 series switch to other Ge2 200 series.

  Now I have the aggregation of links and balancing working between switches.

  Hope this helps

  Best regards, Dave

• Switch Cisco SF300

  Dear all,

  I'll purchse SF 300 24 p POE Switch and could someone tell me if this switch supports configuration through the console?

  As I Sieries ESW - 500 switches and it doesnot support console!

  Please give me the answer to this question!

  Thank you in advance!

  Best regards

  Giorgi

  Hello Giorgi Ninidze,

  Yes on firmware version 1.1.18 and above.

  Cisco Small Business Support Center

  Randy Manthey

  CCNA, CCNA - security