SX10 and H.323 by highway

For the record, is not on the track express-E and CUCM...

I a SX10 recorded a highway of VCS and have run into some problems when I call a Polycom RMX customers. If I call from a SX20 forced to call H.323, everything works fine, but with SIP my client will receive my audio.

As the SX10 cannot force H.323, there is simply not yet this option, I would like the VCSE make interoperability for me. How can I configure the VCSE so that it always uses the H.323 when a specific end point registered calls him a specific endpoint or MCU point? Is this possible? The RMX meets SIP calls, if she only answered calls H.323 the VCSE course automatically would make interoperability.

Appreciate any reply :)

/ Christian

You should pass the SX10 at CE8.2 that just came out, it adds support for H323 for the SX10 and should solve your problem of having to use SIP only, here are the Release Notes for CE8 for reference.

It is not an easy way to force a call using this device or this Protocol, if the calling endpoint can answer using the Protocol it is called, it will be. Yoi simply can't do with just a search rule, you must create an entirely second course area between your VCS-C/E, having active H323 and have the rule search - C for this new game of the Polycom alias box and have a higher priority than your other crossing area.

Tags: Cisco Support

Similar Questions

  • SX10 and Multiway?

    Hello

    Hoping for some clarification, I have a client who has SX10s and VCS. Can I use Multiway to climb a point-to-point to multipoint call call or to add an audio participant?

    release TC7.3 notes speak of ad-hoc conference support, that is only if you are registered to CUCM and using resources for media?

    THX,

    RF

    That's CUCM only, not supported with VCS.  The SX10 Administrator's Guide, pg 64.

    Multipoint Conference [1.1] mode

    Describe how the video system manages the multi-party videoconferences. The value is set to
    CUCMMediaResourceGroupList because these conferences are only supported with the
    CUCM conference bridge.

    Conferences are supported only when the video system is saved in a Cisco Unified
    Communications Manager (CUCM) (version 8.6.2 or newer with a suitable device)
    package); It is not supported when saved on a Cisco telepresence video Communication
    Server (VCS).

  • Highway-E and H.323

    I have a monthly conference that occurs with a home organization. They essentially use a tin can and a string and somehow initiate a conference call to our Expressway-E using H.323 server which I then set it up to forward to a sx10. It is an audio and video call. The problem is that for some unknown reason, the teleconference ends every 30 minutes. I was looking at the properties of logging Expressway-E and I'm trying to understand what I have to configure from the Web page to capture the termination and to see which side (my side or their side) ends the conference call.

    Can anyone recommend some configuration settings to capture the connection to the highway-E?

    As far as I know, the way express-E will not be able to tell which device is causing the dismissal.

    If you have a device configured with a maximum call - the other end, given that the SX10 does not support this call have and as far as I know - or, you have a device such as a firewall must be configured to longer wait times.

    See this thread: https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12601586/h323-inbound-call-drops-after-5-mins-every-time

  • Upgrade CUCM 10.5 and 11.5 with Mediasense, UCCX and confirmation of the highway

    Hello everyone, I'm looking to upgrade CUCM 10.5 to 11.5 and try to find out if the version of Mediasense, UCCX and highway are supported and to confirm with the experts that I am mistaken.

    Currently I have the following text:

    CUCM/CUC - 10.5

    UCCX - 10.6.1

    MediaSense - 11.0.1

    Highway - 8.5.1

    So based on the documentation below if I go to CUCM 11.5 UCCX must be upgraded to version 11 and highway be upgraded to 8.8? MediaSense is ok here its version 11?

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified...

    Thank you

    Dan

    ORC evolving documents now States that UCCX 10.6 (1) can be compatible with 11.5 (1) CUCM (plus all patches) after you install the ciscouccx.106x.cucm11xcompatible.14.cop.sgn hotfix.

    http://www.Cisco.com/Web/software/280840578/114618/Readme-UCCX-1061-UCCX...

    -Alex

  • SX10 and TMS 13.2

    Hi all

    I try to add SX10 endpoint version TC7.1.4.908e4a9 to version 13.2 TMS and get this error message "failed to update field on: EndPoint_VolumeLevel: value cannot be null." ' Parameter name: String.

    You have an idea about this?

    Best regards

    Mesut

    TMS does not officially support the SX10 up to 14.4, as you use a TMS version below, could be the reason why you get the error you see

    See Cisco-TMS-release-notes-14-4, pg 8.

  • SX10 and support with key 8/10

    With the new SX10 user interface seems to be the remote control and probably the web interface.

    Can we pair it the SX10 with a tactile Unit 8 or 10 touch?

    If this is not the case now, it is planned?

    Hi Richard,

    From now SX10 supports 6 TRC remote control with it.

    It can support touch screen in the future, but there is no confirmation about this.

  • CUCM with highways of Collaboration and mobility, a traditional VCS environment

    Hi all

    I'm positive, that I've read this in many posts before mine, or in related presentations, or the deployment of the guides, but I find it difficult to find this info now.

    I'm looking for is a simple real explanation of how VCS-C/E or Expressway-C/E pairs (or single instances) would be required for a deployment of CUCM that wanted to allow external Collaboration (if communication B2B, both the SIP and H.323), more access mobility (i.e. remote workers using Jabber or other devices for VPN less access), as well as integration with the existing H.323 estate and maybe even the comments Jabber thrown into the mix?

    As far as I understand, MRA and external Collaboration must be on separate pairs of the highway, but I can't remember if the license VCS without Expressway (although I think that it's free) can be used to provide collaboration B2B access, or if something is necessary precisely for H.323.

    See you soon

    Chris

    Hi Chris,

    you will find in the annex a PDF where on page 6-7, 16-20 is a short explanation of the difference between VCS - C/E and Expressway-C/E, also on their differences in license.
    In short - used only for ARM Expressway, Expressway-C cannot be SIP/H.323 in the office, just as a proxy for CUCM (AFAIK).

    Here is the discussion and the replica of the Cisco employee who comments Jabber and MRA may not be on the same pair of VCS/Expressway - https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12289446/jabber-guest-and-mra-same-expressway

    And you can configure B2B (XMPP Federation for example) on the motorway-E but before deployment, you must consider some limitations:

    Simultaneous internal Federation Unified CM IM and presence services, as well as the Federation-controlled external
    managed by VCS Cisco only is not supported. If a single internal Federation is required, you must use
    cross-domain Federation unified CM IM and presence Service. The deployment of the available Federation
    configuration options are:
    l the external Federation only (managed by Cisco VCS).
    l internal Federation only (managed by Cisco Unified CM IM and presence Service).
    l internal and external Federation run by Cisco Unified CM IM and presence Service, but requires
    setting up your firewall to allow incoming connections.
    the information in this document - http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/expressway/config_guide/X8-5/XMPP-Federation-with-Cisco-Expressway-and-IM-and-Presence-Service.pdf

  • VCS Expressway, highway

    Hello

    Gently, I confused, what are the differences between VCS Expressway and Freeway?

    -Don't need Expressway a HW (server), it is only allowed in CUCM I need to buy?

    -pre sales engineer, when can I choose VCS-E? and when can I take the freeway?

    Thanks and greetings

    There is a thread here:

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/12699961/Expressway-series-vs-VCs-control-Expressway

    To summarize:

    What are the differences between VCS Expressway and Freeway?

    -VCS expressway or the Server Traversal is the 'legacy' that supports local recording of external H323/SIP based endpoints by using its features of Registrar Gatekeeper h.323 and SIP. It also serves as the traversal server for VCS (client of crossing) control to support for firewall traversal calls and B2B.

    -Highway consists of Core Expressway and the highway, or they call it 'Collaboration Edge'. The concept of highway is the same as the 'life' VCS control + VCS Expressway to provide firewall route, B2B calls. Channel Express is an extension for CUCM controlled environment for Mobile and remote access. With Highway, external clients/video endpoints can register on the CUCM without using VPN. Expressway in this case do not support the records the of endpoints. Endpoints will locally save on CUCM using technology of firewall Expressway (Core + Edge) courses.

    Expressway takes a HW (server), it is only allowed in CUCM I need to buy?

    Highway needs a server and it can be deployed in a virtual environment.

    You can take a look at offerings Cisco Business Edition 6000 (BE6K):

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/Unified-Communications/Business-Edition-6000/data_sheet_c78-717454.html?CacheMode=refresh

    as when can pre sales engineer, I choose VCS-E? and when can I take the freeway?

    -I suggest to contact your Cisco representative helping you find the right solution for your customer.

    Kind regards

    Acevirgil

  • SOLUTION for your HP printer disconnect and/or constantly disconnecting from the network

    If you are having a problem printing, scanning or fax with any HP printer because of this be disconnected and constantly disconnecting from the network, here again is the fix!

    I thought that this all after several failed attempts with HP Support, my Internet access provider and various troubleshooting tasks including reinstall the HP software and more and more.  Well, through self teaching on internet and exhausting search for 6 months, I FINALLY thought to it.  OMG!  I'm a paramedic (not IT) and a little computer but far not an expert.  I have all of you here!  Nobody seems to have the answer, but I'm sure that I'm doing it to 97%.  Whatever it is, if it please answer and let me know that it worked for you!  :-)

    It doesn't matter if your printer is installed cable or wireless.  You don't reinstall your software, no recycling power of your printers or your router/Modem.  Your printer is unstable on the network and continues to log out or disconnect from the network it is NOT because the software is glitched, it isn't a firewall problem by saying, is not a router problem, is not a problem with your power cord, because most networks use a 'Beach' and IP addresses for security reasons This kind of "cycles" the IP addresses of the devices to reduce the risk of an attack.  A printer is not a threat, but the 'network' don't own human intelligence, so he does not know this.  Here are my step by step instructions on how to basically your printer address IP (static IP) instead of change back through a cycle so drop your printer on the network or disconnected.

    Funny, if you're someone who has had the elements in your print queue, they will not print, and you turn your printer off and on again and suddenly your print... well documents, join my club.  The reason it works is that when you turn on the printer, it starts with the same IP address before cycle.  If you are someone who is sitting there for a while and all of a sudden your printed documents without changing you something... it is because through the cycle of change of IP address, it hits your printers IP address and the network would allow him to print.  Not very funny, I know.  It took me forever to figure out why my printer would print sometimes, but not always.  Since I thought at this point, I can SCAN, PRINT, and use all the features of my HP software installed like HP, Photosmart Essentials Solution Center.

    On your printer, go to menu/Setup/network and press OK.  In the network menu, print a "network configuration page" so you can see the IP address and other settings of your printer.

    Now, back to the main menu on the screen of your printers.  Or you can go to your web browser and type the IP address using decimal numbers too and this will take you to the web page of your printers.  Choose: setup\network, then press OK.  Look for the IP settings and press OK. Choose "manual" instead of "automatic". Manually enter the IP address it as well as the default gateway that you can see the Network Setup page you printed earlier.  Note: If you manually set the IP Address of the printer, make sure that it is outside the range of your router's DHCP. Otherwise you might encounter a problem with IP addresses on your network duplicate. (If you don't know how to do this, write back and I'll explain).  Don't forget to click "save changes".  Now, restart your computer, and print just what you want.  :-)

    A trick I often use with DHCP network printers:
    In printers and faxes, right-click on the printer and select "Properties".  Click Add a new port.  Choose standard TCP/IP port configured for the host name of the printer. Read the host name of the network printer configuration sheet.

    Using my method means that you always connect to the printer even if its IP address changes (which can happen with the dynamic configuration). This does not jeopardize the security of your network.  It shows just your printer to stay put and stop traveling the highway of IP address.  :-)

    The DHCP range is the range of IP addresses that the router distributes automatically as devices to join the network.  The DHCP range is determined by the router and each brand has a range that is set at the factory (which can be changed by you).

    Default value for the DHCP of your D-link is 192.168.0.100 to 192.168.0.199.  Thus, outside the DHCP range est.2 a.99.200 a.254.

    Is a handy cheat sheet attached.

    You can change this interval by entering the router settings page - type the router's IP address in a browser, enter the login information and access the DHCP parameter area (varies depending on router, hunting around).

  • Encrypted SX10 cannot connect to the other encrypted SX10 internall

    Hi all

    I have 2 SX10s and can not figure out how encryption works for the latter. They are all two registrants to our VCS - C and unable to connect with each other. The two systems are active encryption and not 'Best Effort'. I think this might have to do with our VCS or our team of safety engineers. Help, please...

    Thank you.

    Hello

    May be small but had to check, are the units recorded over TLS? If not, can you try to do? The certificates should not be required unless TLS check is checked.

  • Tests EX60 UCM and VCS registration

    Hello

    I did a few test with Cisco EX60 a few days ago a the following infrastructure:

    -UCM 8.6.2

    -Cisco VCS control X7.2.2

    -Cisco EX60 series

    -Csco EX90 series

    -Cisco CPIC

    -Cisco IP Phone

    The goal was to try to save the EX60 in SIP mode with UCM and H.323 mode in VCSC and make some calls with EX60 register in both devices, because I have found no documents where it was stated that only I can save EX60, EX90 in VCS or Complutense University of MADRID, but not in both at the same time.

    I recorded the EX90 in VCS and EX60 in VCS (H.323) and UCM (SIP).

    All calls to H.323 devices EX60 send control VCS and all calls all works fine without any problems. If I try to call EX90 to EX60 in SIP mode, the call will be fails. When the EX90 with EX60 H.323 call is connected, the University Complutense of MADRID and using RTMT I saw that the EX60 was on appeal or in busy state.

    -Audio call of the registered IP phone or CPIC to the AAU to EX60: I saw the call in the call control in the EX60 and RTMT and Complutense University of MADRID, but I did not see the call to the control VCS Cisco. If I try to call to EX90 to EX60 using H.323 right now, I got an EX60 busy tone. Also, if I make an audio call to EX60 for an IP phone I can do another audio EX60 call to an IP phone or an EX90. EX90 try to video negotited but calls finally was audio only.

    -The presence does not work when the EX60 is under appeal with the other end H.323 in the Complutense University of MADRID, too the BLFs do not work and does not appear the call at the Complutense University of MADRID.

    -Si EX60 is videoconferencing with EX90, the EX60 can receive an audio call to UCM get connect and the presence and the BLFs working properly.

    I find no more problems at the moment.

    Kind regards.

    This isn't a Setup program that you want to use, or register them both to the VCSC or

    Let CUCM control your end point, then h323 must be disabled.

  • How can I set the resolution to 1080 p using SIP H.323 or SIP protocols H.323 by VCS on EX90, C60 both?

    Hi, I'm an engineer junior network in Korea.

    and, for the first time, I apologize for my bad writing to read in uncomportable. Sorry, as eng is not my mother tongue.

    I tested on SIP to SIP and H.323 to H.323 call. These cases are all correctly, in 1080P(1920*1080),

    BUT

    SIP to H.323 or H.323 SIP dosen't work through VCS. The types of devices are EX90, C60.

    Status of devices: HD-resolution activated license, 6000K, the default bandwidth

    and there is no external problems, because it is the TURN of test on the same LAN.

    I tried several times, but these devices connect sometimes 720P(1280*720) and sometimes each other 1080 p resolution.

    Is anyone knows how to put the devices in trouble their 1080 p not 720 p resolution?

    I'll look forward to your good kindness.

    Please read my bad writing.

    Jinsung salvation.  It would be important to know what SW version running on the CV.  Before X7.1, VCS would set lines for SIP step of BW calling in 1920, and this is fixed in this version.  I would like to ask, if you can, upgrade your VCS to X7.1 and try the call again.  It is perhaps what is you covering for the moment and achieve 1080 p on Interworking call.

    CSCtx32717

    Symptoms: A call interworked will find its video bandwidth, capped at 2 Mbps in one direction.

    Conditions: Video sent by the side of the SIP in the H323 will be capped at 2 Mbps. This may cause a different codec being chosen, or a lower bandwidth on the favorite codec.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/Telepresence/infrastructure/VCs/release_note/Cisco_VCS_Release_Note_X7-1.PDF

    You can try:

    Workaround would be to set optimal definition to high on both
    endpoints or avoid interworking to achieve 1080p in the meantime.

    Let us know the outcome.

    Thanks in advance.

    VR
    P2

  • SX10 or SX20... Adding the calendar to the screen to show the next meeting

    I've seen screenshots of it, but I do not know how to configure it. Documentation for the SX10 is hard to find.  How can I configure my SX10 or SX20 to show the next meeting on the wallpaper next to the clock?

    With the SX10 and the new endpoints with the new user interface, at the request of TMS meetings will be displayed automatically on the screen next to the clock for systems managed by TMS.  This is why the SX10 lacks the TodaysBookings option in its configuration.  I just tested and confirmed.

    What Wayne refers to apply to the endpoints using the older user interface, such as endpoints SX20 and C series.

  • SX10 problem with sending audio with the video presentation

    I recently deployed a Cisco SX10 and found a fault, that I can't understand. When sharing content with extreme of end users, they can see the video but don't get no audio. I checked the settings and I'm confused as to what is misconfigured.

    I checked the bases, wiring, volume, and the settings in the codec it resembles a simple set up. When I introduce locally I have the same problem - no sound from the TV.

    Any ideas?

    Looking at the Guide of Installation SX10 on pg 5.  The SX10 is not an audio connector dedicated to the VGA input, since doesn't send VGA audio you need an additional input for audio.  I test using the HDMI input, and I heard audio locally and on the far - end, since HDMI will send video and audio together.

  • Third party of SX10 control

    The SX10 can be controlled via the port micro USB with a Crestron processor?  If Yes, are there any experience with it?

    The train of crestron will be on one VLAN separate Cisco equipment so control IP can not be used for security reasons.  I know that the SX20 can be controlled with the USB port but the port USB SX10 shows that it is only for "future use".

    Thank you for the pointers.

    You can control the SX10 (and most of the other endpoints) a Crestron processor via the network with SSH/Telnet connection or by using the XML API.  This eliminates any need for the old series control or USB interfaces. Although, if you have a VLAn different and don't have connectivity - so this will be problematic - could you just open a communication to a small subset of ports between the two devices?

    The SX10 is not an endpoint of Integrator type, so is not designed to be used with any system of external control (other than Cisco Touch Panle controllers).  For this kind of integration the SX80 device is one that is referred to in this space.

    Note: Your question might be better placed in the section of telepresence to the forums where these devices are more actively discussed in the conferences section you posted in - I would say, if the above has not answered your query, you move your discussion there.

    Wayne
    --
    Remember the frequency responses and mark your question as answered as appropriate.

Maybe you are looking for