SX80 h323 call question

Hello

I have a SX80 with software version THIS 8.2.2 on my call manager v11.5 via sip.

I can call all internal extensions and can call external pstn.

It's more the CV out there uses H.323 so that when I try to call and conference H.323 via ip call is rejected, after having checked the call log, it's using sip and H.323 not although h.323 is enabled and the direct value (no watchman),

to work around this problem, I have informed my client to add the address called as a contact and manually select the Protocol of control for this contact.

But this isn't a solution for my client, because it is possible from the web interface and users of the Conference are high-level management and do not have the time to do so.

Please I need solution because it is not acceptable to me. and yes I have tried to use x * x * x * x or [email protected] / * / with no use using all the don't SIP not h.323

Best regards

Since the touch screen you can add h323: in the IP Address, this will force endpoint to compose using H323.

Example = h323:1.1.1.1

Other, you must deploy servers of VCS/Highway to the interoperability of SIP H323, http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/unified-communications/telepre... please check

Kind regards

Tags: Cisco Support

Similar Questions

  • Nuisance H323 call SX20

    Hello

    I'm having a problem with a SX20 device that keeps the subject of unwelcome h323 calls, no IP address appears and it just says: "cisco".  We received more than 100 of these calls.  As a work around, I blocked all the h323 on the firewall and permitted in a few IP of known addresses we use.

    I tried to look in the logs of the SX20 to see if I could find the address called IP that was spam so I could block but I couldn't find something useful in there.  Is there a better way all about that now I need to manually add an IP address on the firewall, whenever they want to compose a new person?

    Thank you

    Hello!

    Yes, I noticed that in the newspapers of VCS as well.

    Before the common analyses were on sip/5060/udp.

    The same question that you might have in SIP is expoded to the public, in particular the udp port, but there are also scanning on tcp and at some point there will be TLS as well.

    Its like spam, spammers adopt.

    For now, I would say that, as you did to put behind a firewall and not allow that you really want to have disclosure of sources with (which might not be ideal or even possible) or use a call control as vcs or cucm + highway from the outset.

    If you have your firewall from the outset, you can log the ip addresses trying to do h323 and sip connections, you can try to block. But its also while playing hide and seek, there is no common ips used for scanning, and anyway, you don't know where they scan from, often compromised systems are used for these scans.

    Some firewalls have features of geo - ip, which you could block the continents / countries / regions that you do not contact.

    In any case, consider using a call control and admission control there.

    Please rate this announcement using the stars below.

  • Missing call to E20 in H323 call control buttons

    Hello, everyone runs into a problem with the E20 videophone, where if it's in a H323 call hold and transfer buttons do not appear?  It seems as if make or receive a call from H323 in this case.  SIP works very well. I'm under TE4.1.1 in this environment.

    Sigh... do not currently implemented.

    Link to RN:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/Telepresence/endpoint/software/TE4/Release_notes/cisco_ip_video_phone_e20_te_software_release_notes_te4.PDF

  • Atrix 2 call questions

    Hello people;

    I have a strange situation at home. I have two Atrix 2 lines at home I... wife and I e. She questions receing and callls, i.e. calls are received and out but none of the parties can hear each other. The calls are connected but not audio on each side.

    I had similar problems only once on my atrix 2. Asked me to change a few 4g sim card SIM cards. I did it for her also and the problem is recurrent for her several times over the last 2 weeks. Unfortunately, it happens most of the time at home.

    Regardless if she try to calll fixed or is called from the fixed network and the call would be in contact but no sound on silence right next door.

    If anyone has experienced this problem and saw any resolution. One thing I excluded the SIM card or the network since if she swaps the SIM on a 3 g iphone, calls go by and are thus received without any problem.

    Any help, greatly appreciated.

    see you soon

    atldude

    In addition, check if changes have been made in call for the setting - in particular settings for hearing impaired.

    You can walk his phone in an AT & T store as well and see what they say. Or call the technical support of AT & T. You can do a reset before calling just to see if that makes a difference. If a reset or the new SIM not fixed no and nothing is wrong with AT & T, you will likely get the permuted phone.

  • SX80 - H323 continues to change OFF

    Hello

    We just got our first SX80 intending to use it for dialing SIP Voip.

    So far, we have older tandbergs, C40s and of the SX20 but they all stand alones use H323. We use a BlueJeans gateway service is the only thing that really, we connect to the video.

    It worked fine on the SX80 for the last month.

    I spent the last few days find out how to get the SIP dialing to work and finally he stood up and running last night.

    However, I could compose is more BlueJeans via H323. I discovered the system Config > Network Services had H323 set to off. I allowed and confirmed with the Contacts entries defined for use H323, it works fine. This morning, H323 was set off again. I have reactivated it and about 30 minutes later, he was put off again.

    I'm guessing it is sycing with CUCM and turn it off again, but I don't see anything in CUCM which seems to indicate an option for this.

    We are on 11.0.1.21900 - 11 CUCM

    SX80 is on TC7.3.6.ea51021

    H323 is not supported by CUCM and when you perform the commissioning with CUCM, H323 will be disabled after every reboot (working as expected).

    See the release notes Page 12

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/Telepresence/endpoint/software/...

    "When you use CUCM commissioning, endpoint cannot save to a VCS (SIP or H323) at the same time. This use case is not supported by Cisco. When CUCM provisioning is active, the H323 mode is disabled. Cisco recommends customers to migrate from H323, SIP telepresence. "

  • Unable to make 1 + 1 audio call SX80 video call?

    I was under the impression that the SX10 has been the only codec that could not do 1 + 1 video audio call.

    I bought a SX80 without multisite, but once I'm in a video call, it won't let me add an audio call. Is this good?

    What version of software is the SX80?

    You might be hitting bug CSCuq41471, if you do not have anything below TC7.3.  See the TC7 Release Notes, on pg 18 under "SX80 updates".

  • CSCub20591 - TCP connection expires on H323 call and40; Firewall problem

    Hey all,.

    I have a client that has this problem.  I sent him the details of this bug, but he has no idea of what setting would need update on its ASA to fix this time-out period.

    Anyone have any ideas?

    Thank you
    Justin

    Hey Justin, funny see you here, haha.

    I never ran on precisely this issue, but I know about the ASA you can set timeouts for different classes of traffic, essentially matching via ACL and by applying a global or interface-specific policy via.

    Some notes on the method I found here - and http://www.networkoc.net/increase-tcp-timeouts-on-traffic-destinated-to-your-sql-server-cisco-asa-8-2/

    Official documentation Cisco - http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa84/configuration/guide/asa_84_cli_config/conns_connlimits.html#wp1179119

    If all goes well which can help to point in the right direction.

    See you later!

  • Endpoint collaboration - Protocol call by default Auto - does not seek after failing with SIP H323

    Hi all

    Hoping someone in the community may be able to explain how the "auto" setting for the default calling Protocol?

    My understanding is that, when together, he should try to SIP and H323 - however, it seems to just try SIP then stop.

    I've seen CSCum27379, but could not know if it was fixed in the end.

    Context:

    We are currently move to SIP from H323, and have all items on the same VCS cluster endpoint (Polycom HDX & Cisco) double (first H323 / by default). The problem is that some people dial still using IP addresses, however our new external gateway and bridge services cannot be connected to the use of SIP (non-interoperable).

    The Polycom HDXs are ok, they'll just try a protocol after the other.

    The Cisco seems to be stuck on one, so either not will have access to the new services (except preconfigured in the address book), or will have all their IP address interoperability of point to point calls.

    Is there a way to direct address IP SIP work while composition on the VCS?

    I was also hoping to create a search rule that blackholed IP SIP addressed calls would force the reversal, but did not: (.)

    As always, appreciate any guidance you can provide.

    Rich

    This bug link you to, CSCum27379, there is no solution for it that its status is "completed".

    There is a specific order in which the endpoint will attempt to establish a call and depends on what protocol endpoint is saved for use, pg 84 SX20 Administrator's Guide :

    Allows the automatic selection of the memorandum of Appeal based on what protocols are available. If several protocols are available, is of the order of priority: 1) SIP; (2) H323; (3) H320. If the system is unable to register, self-selection chooses H323

    Endpoint won't try the first Protocol in the list and then switch to the other, he tries only one he can and that's all.  If you subscribed using SIP, but you need to make a call to a registered endpoint H323, you must set the Protocol to call to serve as a H323 or allow interoperability on the VCS to allow SIP-H323 calls.

  • Calls H323

    Hello

    I have some problems with the internet through ok with SIP h323 calls, can not be. the topology of the network is less to:

    SX20 A, B SX20, SX20 C-> pack of Stater (double nic) VCS-> firewall-> internet-> tandberg c60 (not registered in VCS)

    in this scenario, since internet can I make calls to any interior sx20 registered in VCS?

    I appreciate your comments.

    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Juan,

    of course, you can place a call to any internal endpoint. If your public DNS SRV record properly configured something like this:

    A Cisco.com. 60370 IN A 72.163.4.161
    ABDELKADER Cisco.com. 60330 IN ABDELKADER 2001:420:1101:1: a
    SRV _h323ls._udp. Cisco.com. 3599 IN SRV 1 0 1719 vcsgw.cisco.com.
    SRV _h323cs._tcp. Cisco.com. 3600 IN SRV vcsgw.Cisco.com 1 0 1720.
    SRV _sips._tcp. Cisco.com. 3600 IN SRV 1 0 and 5061 vcsgw.cisco.com.
    SRV _sip._tcp. Cisco.com. 3095 IN SRV 1 0 5060 vcsgw.cisco.com.

    then, when a call such as H323:[email protected] / * / arrives at VCSE, VCSE looks upward through his search rule (if properly configured) and route the call to the endpoint registered (as a pbx).

    Best regards, Ahmad

  • SIP spam attack and MCU and vcs - e call

    as far as I know sip call spam attacks is done against the videoconference, connected with a public ip address, I disabled the sip but im not sure if my mcu and vcs - e with sound are vulnerable to them? they pose no threat to security for them? and if so, how? and what can we do about it?

    It is a well known problem and it affects H.323 and SIP, take a look at the below threads:

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/12340591/nuisance-h323-calls-SX20

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/12336591/sourceh323idcisco-incomingcalls

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/12508641/Cisco-source-spam-calls-stepped-complexity

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/12613681/attack-vcse

    There are many more discussions on this issue, the above, this is just a small selection. :)

    You do not need to disable SIP on the VCS-E, all you need to do is turn SIP UDP unless you need it for voice services.

    You can protect yourself by using a CPL on the VCS-E who will avoid calls to go through your MCU, or anything else you have sitting behind the VCS-E. This is assuming that you are using a combo of VCS-C/VCS-E, with the VCS - C behind a firewall and the VCS-E outside the firewall, for example in the demilitarized zone.

    Having just trouble ask points of termination or MCU sitting in nature with public IP addresses.

    These scans, moreover, mainly looking for systems that will allow them to make free international calls.

    /Jens

    Please evaluate the answers and makr as 'answered' questions as appropriate.

  • EX90 two autonomous with the public IP address can make video calls among them self on the Internet or not?

    Dear expert;

    I am very new to VCS and TP Cisco.

    We implement now presence Cisco TV with VCS - C, VCS-E TMS, TCS, MCUS and endpoints with Jabber in a single edit.

    and in another configuration CUCM 10.5, UCCX 10.5 IM & P, Jabber with some 10 officers.

    Now the question is in our building on the 2nd floor we have an EX90 and on the 5th floor an EX90 and on local network, we can make video calls using the IP address.

    In the same way is it possible to make a video call between 2 devices EX90 (both have public IP) present in a location different in the same city on the Internet without the participation of VCS - C and VCS-E.

    It's the client request :)

    Concerning

    Paiva

    Yes, but leaving these systems outside in nature with public IP addresses, leaving you are vulnerable to a number of questions. See for example http://www.videonationsltd.co.uk/2014/11/h-323-cisco-spam-calls/

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/12336591/sourceh323idcisco-incomingcalls

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/12340591/nuisance-h323-calls-SX20

    The offers above with H.323 calls, in addition to this, you will encounter similar problems using SIP where the systems will be analyzed by tools such as SIPVicious

    /Jens

    Please note the answers and mark questions as "answered" as appropriate

  • Questions about VCS, MCU, ISDN gateway license

    Dear Expert.

    I question of license on my next device.

    (1) I have:

    VCSC - 10 calls Non-traversal, crossing 100 calls license license

    vcse - 5 traversal calls

    If I register the mcu and the endpoint to the VCSC as the guardian h323.

    I should have a 15 (5 calls traveral and 10 calls non-traversal) sites h323 conference call simultaneously on the MCU?

    > If I record my MCUS and endpoints to the ISDN gateway as the guardian h323.

    > I should be able to do an 18 sites (1 h323 calls and ISDN 17 * 128 Kbps) conference at the same time call

    > on the MCU?

    GK embarked on telepresence ISDN Gateway has no limitation for the number of concurrent calls.

    Limitation is only for the registration number.

    As gateway ISDN support audio connection gateway exclusively, with simultaneous simple T1 (T1 = 24 b, PRI = 23 b = D), maximum number of calls is superior to '18' as audio call consume only 1 b-channel.

  • Encryption of video calls

    Hello...

    I have a question about video encryption endpoints. I use a SX80 to call a MX300. When I unsubscribe from our 10.5.2 CUCM and H.323 allows to establish a the call is successful and I get a pop up "encrypted call."

    When I enter them on the CUCM as SIP endpoints and try to make a call I get 'impossible to establish the encrypted call' and the call fails.  Our CUCM is in unsafe Mode, but he says that he has supported for TLS and SRTP encryption 256 and 128. If I put the two end points to Besteffort the call goes through but I get the pop up "unencrypted call.

    It must be in mixed mode for all encrypted sessions?

    Any help is appreciated.

    The CUCM must be in mixed mode for secure communication. (See guides attached below for the required reference parameters and config.)

     

    Cisco TelePresence management endpoints TC on CUCM 10.5.1 (TC7.2)

    (p.11)

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/Telepresence/endpoint/codec-c-series/TC7/Administration-Guide/administering-endpoints-running-tc72-on-ucm1051.PDF

     

    * NOTE *.

     

    • CUCM must operate in mixed mode for secure communication.

     

    • You must define a security profile of device for each type of endpoint.

     

    • If you want to allow several modes for the same type of endpoint authentication, you must set up a profile for each mode.

     

    • See the Safety Guide of CUCM for more information:

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/voice_ip_comm/CUCM/security/10_0_1/secugd/CUCM_BK_C68276B4_00_cucm-Security-Guide-100.html

  • VI front panel does not close when it is done executing, when this vi was called by reference.

    I created a simple vi set to indicate the problem I'm having. I run dynamically under vi to leave a main application. Simply the main application is my test exec and the Subvi I call dynamically is different tests. In the example I have write here the criterion vi is called Test electric 1(vi). I configured this electric Test 1 vi to see the front when it is called and close later while initially closed.  Problem is that it doesn't close before.

    Other things to keep in mind

    • I want to be able to run the vi test and do not wait until it is done.

    I'm using LabVIEW 2012 SP1.

    Basically the fence after that call questions only if the VI is called as a Subvi (as if you open you a VI and run it, it does not close when it's done).  Are two ways to work around this or have your app high lvl close the VI when it's done, it's explained here:

    http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/987B2026B41BD39786256CF800032E8C

    or having your VI close when it's done.  A reference of the VI and the front panel: Close call node.

    I hope this helps.

  • WebEx h323 dtmf relay

    Hello

    I am facing a problem with endpoint h323 calling for webex.

    It connects to the right if has been previously logged by an organizer. When I try to connect as an organizer with the h.323 endpoint, it fails. The endpoint is autonomous, not registered in any guard.

    I can hear the tones generated in the endpoint, but webex does not seem to receive.

    So I would like to know what h323 dtmf relay mechanisms are supported in webex.

    Anyone know where I can find this info?

    Hello Ignacio,

    If you are referencing a CMR-Cloud here, for H.323 DTMF CMR-Cloud room would support h245-signal only.

    -Jonathan

Maybe you are looking for