Tests EX60 UCM and VCS registration

Hello

I did a few test with Cisco EX60 a few days ago a the following infrastructure:

-UCM 8.6.2

-Cisco VCS control X7.2.2

-Cisco EX60 series

-Csco EX90 series

-Cisco CPIC

-Cisco IP Phone

The goal was to try to save the EX60 in SIP mode with UCM and H.323 mode in VCSC and make some calls with EX60 register in both devices, because I have found no documents where it was stated that only I can save EX60, EX90 in VCS or Complutense University of MADRID, but not in both at the same time.

I recorded the EX90 in VCS and EX60 in VCS (H.323) and UCM (SIP).

All calls to H.323 devices EX60 send control VCS and all calls all works fine without any problems. If I try to call EX90 to EX60 in SIP mode, the call will be fails. When the EX90 with EX60 H.323 call is connected, the University Complutense of MADRID and using RTMT I saw that the EX60 was on appeal or in busy state.

-Audio call of the registered IP phone or CPIC to the AAU to EX60: I saw the call in the call control in the EX60 and RTMT and Complutense University of MADRID, but I did not see the call to the control VCS Cisco. If I try to call to EX90 to EX60 using H.323 right now, I got an EX60 busy tone. Also, if I make an audio call to EX60 for an IP phone I can do another audio EX60 call to an IP phone or an EX90. EX90 try to video negotited but calls finally was audio only.

-The presence does not work when the EX60 is under appeal with the other end H.323 in the Complutense University of MADRID, too the BLFs do not work and does not appear the call at the Complutense University of MADRID.

-Si EX60 is videoconferencing with EX90, the EX60 can receive an audio call to UCM get connect and the presence and the BLFs working properly.

I find no more problems at the moment.

Kind regards.

This isn't a Setup program that you want to use, or register them both to the VCSC or

Let CUCM control your end point, then h323 must be disabled.

Tags: Cisco Support

Similar Questions

  • Where can I find documentation on how to get the VCS - C and VCS-E to Exchange presence information

    I turned presence on my VCS - C and VCS-E, but depending on whether I am VPNed or not, I don't see the State of the presence of my side of the firewall.

    I checked for x7.1 Administrator's guide, I looked in the guide of authentication devices, and I'm at a bit of a loss.

    Is what I'm trying to do as possible, and if so, what do I have to do to make this work?

    I have a pretty simple setup - that works very well, could give you some ideas;

    Two VCS - Independent C (soon to be clustered) and a VCS-E;

    all internal clients of the JabberVideo register with a VCS - C, and when external registers with the VCS-E (all of my users of Singapore recorded with the VCS-E).

    Authentication is directly with AD and is made on the a WHAT VCS - C regardless of the user is registered with the VCS - C or the VCS-E.

    PUA and presence disabled on VCS-E and activated on the VCS - C, which is used as SIP registrar.

    Authentication on VCS - e:

    Default subfield "do not check".

    Default zone "do not check".

    Traversal server box "do not check".

    Authentication on VCS - C:

    Default subfield "audit powers.

    MOVI area 'audit powers.

    Point final SIP registration box "treat as authenticated.

    Course customer area 'audit powers.

    Authentication works well, the users cannot sign up for the VCS-E with the wrong password or user name, and presence works well too - both inside and outside.

    /Jens

  • C VCS registration issues

    Hello, I am facing problems of a new endpoint SX20 recorded in the control of the VCS, we received it with version 7.3.0 and each time it was recorded as a H323 device in the control of the VCS, has shown in the point of termination and VCS as good, but the h323 calls cannot be forwarded I checked the record in the VCS control and the RAS RAS Signaling as a 0.0.0.0:1719 location, the first thing that comes to mind was that a firewall can be malforming the package, I checked open ports too just in case about to endpoint and h323/q931 was open, otherwise he could not register at all. The I did a logging extended in the endpoint to capture recording debugged and found that endpoint sent the RAS location, signage with 0.0.0.0, generated from the endpoint itself, my question is, what could be caused by this problem? I upgraded to version 7.3.1 TCS endpoint, but the same thing happens, would it be a hardware problem? Whenever the system retrieves the IP endpoint of the NIC, to send it in the form of signs of RAS/places, there must be something wrong, the process or it receives the ethernet config? I have many other features of h323 of registered endpoints and works very well. Because now I have registered in the system as a SIP device, and works very well, which makes the VCS not interoperability, including the SIP registration confuses me, because it also retrieves the ip configuration and registry endpoint SX20 very well.

    Found the problem - under configuration H323 there is a parameter to the NAT, which had failed on 'On '.

    Set to 'Off' correction of the problem.

    I hope this helps...

  • Cisco BE6k and VCS Center/periphery

    Hi all

    There is a new Be6k high density in the test environment.

    However, we have no clear idea about the VCS Core/edge with the CUCM deployment in the BE6k.

    1. We install the VCS core and edge on the same server BE6k? After that, the edge of the VCS awarded with a DMZ ip address? Or install the other edge of VCS of the device?
    2. What the configuration between CUCM and VCS? Because I can not any related document of the Cisco.com.

    Best regards

    Ben Lai

    1 both work, you just need to make sure good design and configure the underlying network and ports that connect each VM

    2 MANY West information on this

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/unified-communications/Telepresence...

  • having an iphone 6.  The ringtone does not make a noise.   I tested the ringtone and it sounds however when I receive a call or text or email, the Bell is silent

    I have an iphone 6.  The ringtone does not make a noise.   I tested the ringtone and it sounds however when I receive a call or text or email, the Bell is silent

    Hello Jimmy10 66,

    Thank you for reaching out to the Community Support from Apple. I know how it is important to follow your alerts, and I want to help you get your work again.

    Before we get too far, it's always a good idea to check that your 'secret' button just above your volume controls is not engaged. If you see that the yellow indicator go ahead and switch to the other position to turn it off.

    Alternatively, you can drag up from the bottom of the screen and make sure that the control of "do not disturb" is disabled.

    If those who are for the time off, go ahead and restart your phone and retest alerts. If the behaviour continues or if you encounter any problems, please reach out again and let the community know what other steps you have tried. The entire community is here to help.

    Best regards

  • When I wear the watch on my left wrist and Iset the orientation of the digital Crown for the side LEFT it also stops receiving notifications? I tested it again and again, but if the digital Crown is set to left on left wrist ir stops receiving notificatio

    When I wear the watch on my left wrist and I set the orientation of the digital Crown also for the side LEFT, he ceases to receive notifications, I tested it again and again, as soon as counsel for the Attorney general setting is left on the left wrist... notifications stops on the watch?

    Hello

    How notifications behave depends on the State of your devices and on the configuration of your watch. In order to provide notifications to your attention as soon as possible:

    -If your iPhone is unlocked, you will receive notifications on your iPhone instead of on your watch.

    -If your iPhone is locked or asleep and that your watch is unlocked and on your wrist, you will receive notifications on your watch.

    -If your watch is locked or allowed to do not disturb, notifications will be sent to your iPhone.

    More information: on your Apple Watch - Apple Support notifications

  • Device simulated in MAX, auto test without error and has work Test panels, but is not displayed in the DAQ assistant.

    I am trying to create a development machine, where we can test the new code without using our physical hardware. I followed this guide to set up a system of simulation. I get to step 3.2 b, but the device does not appear in the DAQ assistant. MAX, the device self test and gites calibrated successfully, and when I open the test panels, I see some sort of signal. I guess that's a default entry simulated since I didn't that device to look for anything? Note that two devices, I am creating the show upward into the devices section and Interfaces, but that, even after running auto calibrate, automatic Calibration date is not yet specified.

    When I try to test the device and create a voltage according to the guide, I can't see a device in the creator of data acquisition task.

    Steps 1 and 2 of this guide are of course met. Step 3 is not, but this is not surprising because a simulated device is in device in any case manager. Also, I'm not under RT, so step 4 is satisfied.

    Someone at - it ideas?

    That would be because the PXI-5124 is a digitizer not an analog input device.  You must use the NI SCOPE not NOR DAQmx driver

  • Why an I get the test page yellow and black with each print job. I have a HP PSC 1350

    Why an I get the test page yellow and black with each print job? I have a HP PSC 1350

    Hi - I assume that the page that you see printed is the alignment page.  This happens usually if the alignment process has not been made.  All you should have to do is take the printed alignment page and place it face down on the scan scanner glass and press.  Who must complete the alignment process and eliminate the page printing every time.  If you have problems, try following the procedure described in this document.

    Hope that helps.

  • I understood the problem, but don't know how to fix it. It is said to run dxdiag because of the direct 3D, so I run dxdiag and it finishes loading, I test direct 3D and it works very well...

    I understood the problem, but don't know how to fix it. It is said to run dxdiag because direct 3D, so i run dxdiag and it finishes loading, I test direct 3D and it works fine, so I re-run halo, but then it still doesn't work. so I went online for patches, but when I downloaded a patch for windows 7, but I have windows xp. so I go back to the internet and search for patches for windows xp, but there is no result. so I thought change to windowed mode halo would work but it dident work when I ran halo 3rd becose my color depth is low, I have 24-bit color quality, but I don't know how to change, so I look for a way to change this for months and no results.so to microsoft answers site please help me because I have nothing else in my mind to the difficulty of halo

    I have:
    (1.halo of the trial
    (custom edition 2.halo (full)
    Halo is ever going to work on my computer
    because he never did
    I play with my cousins that I visit about 3 times a year

    Hello

    I suggest you go through the link.

    Minimum system requirements for Halo: Combat Evolved
    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/829479

    Please check if the computer meets the minimum system requirements to play HALO game
     
    You can also refer to:
  • SIP spam attack and MCU and vcs - e call

    as far as I know sip call spam attacks is done against the videoconference, connected with a public ip address, I disabled the sip but im not sure if my mcu and vcs - e with sound are vulnerable to them? they pose no threat to security for them? and if so, how? and what can we do about it?

    It is a well known problem and it affects H.323 and SIP, take a look at the below threads:

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/12340591/nuisance-h323-calls-SX20

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/12336591/sourceh323idcisco-incomingcalls

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/12508641/Cisco-source-spam-calls-stepped-complexity

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/12613681/attack-vcse

    There are many more discussions on this issue, the above, this is just a small selection. :)

    You do not need to disable SIP on the VCS-E, all you need to do is turn SIP UDP unless you need it for voice services.

    You can protect yourself by using a CPL on the VCS-E who will avoid calls to go through your MCU, or anything else you have sitting behind the VCS-E. This is assuming that you are using a combo of VCS-C/VCS-E, with the VCS - C behind a firewall and the VCS-E outside the firewall, for example in the demilitarized zone.

    Having just trouble ask points of termination or MCU sitting in nature with public IP addresses.

    These scans, moreover, mainly looking for systems that will allow them to make free international calls.

    /Jens

    Please evaluate the answers and makr as 'answered' questions as appropriate.

  • VCS - C and VCS-E switch to x8.7

    Hi, I plan on upgrading to VCS version x8.7 (of x8.2) to meet the needs of encryption for a RMC-cloud deployment and looking for some feedback from the community on a number of things:

    -I shouldn't need a key to unlock because the upgrade is the same version, correct?

    -J' need to upgrade the VCS - C and VCS - E with the same version of software, correct?

    N ' needs nothing to do away with the MCU? We are currently at version 4.5 software (1.45).

    Thanks for your help,

    Brad

    Release keys are only required if the major software version changes, minor changes for example, ranging from X8.2 to X8.7 does not require a key to unlocking.

    VCS - C and E must be on the same version, the only time where they should be on separate versions is when software updates.

    Nothing should be changed from the MCU.

  • Call the flow of VCS-E and VCS - C

    Hi all

    I'm looking for some documents describing the call flow of VCS-E and VCS - C in H.323 as the jpg I have attached.

    (Especially when endpoint dials on internet to the intranet)

    Are there documents like tthat?

    Best regards

    Kotaro Hashimoto

    Call the stream while VCS - E uses the SANCTION for traversal Protocol (almost identical even use H.460.18 to signal flow).

    Please note that this call flow only not understand key messages each Exchange of messages between VCS & endpoint as well as VCS-E & VCS - C.

  • Issue with LINK ISDN and VCS

    Dear Expert

    Link ISDN is capable of working with VCS?

    As I go through the link Cisco TelePresence ISDN administrator guide, he said that endpoint must be registered at VSC when you use the mode ISDN PRI E1 and ISDN BRI Euro type.

    Is that means whenever I want to make a call ISDN with ISDN LINK, I de-register endpoint of VSC on gateway H323 and SIP pox

    Currently my endpoints use VCS as gateway H323 and SIP pox

    Thank you

    Tung

    Hello Tung!

    I wasn't looking for it, but I would say that the Administrator's guide shows just examples, which could

    be configured, not exclusive requirements.

    See the section called "Complete example with an IP infrastructure" and VCS

    In short, endpoint is connected to ISDNlink device and the ISDN link records for VCS.

  • Control of Cisco and VCS VCS Expressway

    Dear team,

    We bought Cisco VCS and VCS Expressway 7.X.

    Need download link for the model of the FVO and software and please guide how to install Cisco VCS and VCS Expressway 7.X?

    Thank you

    Cisco_VCS_Virtual_Machine_Deployment_Guide_X7-2 may exceed OVA installation and initial configuration.  Additional configuration and deployment guides that they can be found here.

  • Is it possible to send an alert through TMS when a crossing box fails between a VCS - C and VCS-E?

    Hi all

    TMS has many features to alert, but I don't see an easy way to alert us to the fact that a crossing area may have failed between a VCS - C and VCS - E, or even neighbor or other types of areas than peers with other devices. Is this possible?

    As we now have a large number of VCS, it is important for us to know that these peering is active. It is not necessarily the case that individual machines become inaccessible, just the interconnection network fails for some reason any.

    Thank you very much

    Chris

    As much as I know tms cannot do that, she must be a feature request.

    / Magnus

    Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

Maybe you are looking for