The image quality with the Canon 5Dmark 2 vs... The 5Dmark3?

Similar Questions

• How to keep from losing the image quality with environments found on the web. I drag the image in PS CC and it is all pixelated.

  I am PS CC for the first time. So what I'm trying to do, is to drag the different environments found on the web mainly 800 x 800 or near. When I drag the image in the page the image using Photoshop default PS is pixelated. How can I fix it. I run Windows 7 64 bit.

  Get a picture of higher resolution.

• Images Photoshop CS6 and Canon Mark II RAW G7X: open?

  Photoshop CS6 cannot open RAW images taken with a Canon G7X Mark II. I downloaded and installed Adobe DNG Converter 9.6 but still cannot open these images. Help.

  Canon G7X Mark II raw requires 9.6 cab if you need to create DNG for your G7X Mark II of Canon files. RAW files use CS6 ACR 9.1.1.

  Devices supported by Adobe Camera Raw

• I recently updated the Canon mark II to the mark iii, and the images taken of the mark iii will not make previews in bridge. Bridge will show previews for the images taken with the mark ii, but not the mark iii. I have adobe cc and use

  recently updated the Canon mark II, mark iii, and the images taken of the mark iii will not make previews in bridge. Bridge will show previews for the images taken with the mark ii, but not the mark iii. I have adobe cc and am using camera raw 9.2. I checked the updates and it is said that there is not. I also tried to purge the cache several times and that didn't work either. Any help with this would be so appreciated its driving me crazy!

  Take a look at this: generic icons | Files camera raw | Adobe Bridge

• Using a format 16 x 9 with my Canon M3, HDR merge seems to "squash" height of the image

  Using an image with my Canon EOS 16: 9 format M3, HDR merge seems "squash" (in height) the merged image from the same (but with different exposure values) images submitted to "merge". Why? Happening today?

  In addition, please refer to 'CC with merger HDR Lightroom problems'

• IdeaPad Yoga 13 - HDMI of bad image quality on the TV 1080 p screen?

  Hi people, I have recently connected my Yoga via HDMI to my TV Samsung 40 ". Unfortunately, the image quality does not as good as my old T61 via VGA hooked up to my TV. Image via HDMI on my TV has some sort of "shadows" around the edges at all. I use a HDMI Basics Amazon cable that is capable of 3D and Ethernet over HDMI - I think this cable should be ok.

  Did it someone else faced with problems with the picture quality of the Yoga on a TV via HDMI before?

  Just for completeness: it was my TV sharpness settings. I had to turn off completely disable the artifacts.

• Compress and the same image quality

  Hi there thank you in advance...

  Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Prod

  PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production

  CORE Production 10.2.0.5.0

  AMT for Linux: Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production

  NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production

  I tried this code, unfortunately the image is blurred after a scale. My question is how to scale and compress, but the image is not blurred... I mean same quality with the original:

  / * Formatted on 29/07/2015 11:12:46 (PS5 v5.139.911.3011) * /.

  DECLARE

  obj ORDSYS.ordimage;

  b BLOB;

  BEGIN

  NULL;

  SELECT DOC

  B

  OF ORDMGMT. IB_LOVE

  WHERE CONTRACT_NO = '401000011210'

  UPDATE;

  obj: =.

  () ORDSYS.ordimage

  () ORDSYS. ORDSOURCE

  b,

  NULL,

  NULL,

  NULL,

  SYSDATE,

  1

  ),

  NULL,

  NULL,

  NULL,

  NULL,

  NULL,

  NULL,

  NULL VALUE

  );

  obj.setProperties ();

  obj. Process ('maxScale = 150 150');

  obj. Process ('fileFormat = GIFF, compressionFormat = GIFLZW');

  b: = obj.getContent ();

  UPDATE ORDMGMT. IB_LOVE

  SET DOC = b

  WHERE CONTRACT_NO = '401000011210'; -20976

  END;

  Unless the image is already 150 x 150 pixels, you will rarely be able to scale to this size without some loss of quality. According to the characteristics of the image, you can play with the operators to try to mitigate some of the adverse side effects - contrast, quantification or gamma.may using different image processing. Try something like

  obj. Process ('maxScale = 150 150 fileFormat = GIFF compressionFormat = contrast GIFLZW = "60" "");

  (Note that you can scale and compress in a statement).

  • Is the photographic, or synthetic image (a screenshot or a document scanned, for example)?
  • What is the size of the original image?
  • Is the original color, grayscale or black and white image?
  • Is the result must be 150 x 150? More you get more results.
  • Should the result be a GIF? Photographic images dimensionnera probably better using something like JPG.

  Oracle 11.2 has also added a new operator 'sharpen' which may help, but you're on 10.2 so unless you upgrade that is not an option.

  If fileFormat = JFIF is an option, then you can also play with the compressionQuality operator.

  Kind regards

  Bob

• The upgrade and image quality [compare the elements to Photoshop]

  Hello:

  I've been using 6 items (yes I know, pre-historic) to edit and organize my photos. My collection of items has about 2600 images. Time to upgrade and I am convinced that Lightroom is the way forward for the organization. My question is for the Assembly. Almost all of my editing has been managed by the elements basic stuff. I wonder if I need the full Photoshop provided with Creative Cloud.

  My first question is program Photoshop will produce a better quality in a picture if I did the same editing with my old Elements 6. There was an improvement in the image processing program?

  Notice please.

  Jim Rendos

  Hi Jim

  Camera RAW is certainly improved, the come of great change with PV2012 (process Version 2012 aka ACR 7) introduced with Photoshop CS6.  Other changes have been made to Camera RAW, and Lightroom even more, but their impact on the image quality is zero (AFAICR).  Of course, you'd have the same version of treatment with the recent versions of Lightroom if you take this route.

  The difference between PV2012 and PV2010 are noticeable in the shadow and highlight recovery.  Especially to hide him.  You remember produces bad artifacts setting shadows / highlights.  PV2012 allows you to push the bejazus from a RAW file while keeping things at least somewhere near sensitive.  I've always hated the shadows / highlights and could never understand the fuss people do about it.

  Who help me?

• Fortunately, I have download my Canon 7 d CR2 files using Photoshop elements 11; but when I do the same thing with a Canon G7X files are not recognized.  I downloaded the latest update of Adobe for RAW files.  Advice gratefully received.

  Fortunately, I have download my Canon 7 d CR2 files using Photoshop elements 11; but when I do the same thing with a Canon G7X files are not recognized.  I downloaded the latest update of Adobe for RAW files.  Advice gratefully received.

  You need Adobe raw camera 8.7 version. Unfortunately your software is earlier than the camera. ACR 8.7 is only compatible with PSE13. But it is possible to download and install the free DNG Converter to convert your raw files to the universal Raw format files and Adobe will be open in all versions of PSE (keep your originals as backups and for use in the software of the camera factory)

  Download Windows (.exe file) click here DNG Converter 8.7

  Download Mac (.dmg file) click here DNG Converter 8.7

  You can convert an entire folder of images raw with a single click. See this quick video tutorial:

  You Tube click here for the DNG Converter tutorial

• Who has the highest image quality?

  I'm working on a huge project, analysis of the thousands of books, documents and files that I have collected over the years in the form of PDF files. I use a scanner high speed when possible, using a dish only for items that cannot be digitized with a scanner high speed (large size files and folders in several pages for example). My plan is to digitize everything as quickly as possible, so I can have a digital copy safely stored in my computer and some external hard drives. This is probably what I need to do for only text files, which I can throw then (the copy of the paper, that is).

  However, I want to make a new image analysis (and perhaps some elements of text) at a higher resolution on my scanner so I can have copies of higher quality. Then I'll try to figure out the best resolution and what file type to save as. I use a scanner Epson Perfection V33. Am I right in thinking that quality would be offered by a .tiff file, followed by a .jpg with a .pdf file file lower quality?

  The quality of most of my material is not extraordinary, and I probably won't be much as TIFF, scanner due to the huge file size. So I think that the best option for images (and the text that I might want to scan as an image) is jpg. Is there any particular optimal resolutions that you would recommend?

  Thank you.

  "Image quality" in a document PDF is created by the image quality of the image that is presented in the PDF document.

  A PDF file can and often there are a lot of images with each having a different image resolution.

  If you have content text on paper and that you want to scan it, go to TIFF and then create a PDF of TIFF.

  This optimises the accuracy of OCR recognition.

  JPEG production involves typically "ugly" compression (compression by destructive removal of content) - not too goof to images of text that you want to pass by OCR.

  Analysis of the text to TIFF - 300 dpi will suffice in most situations. Avoid JPEG compression.

  Be well...

• A question about the image quality?

  I create my menus by using an image that is offered by selected relative when positioning.

  That's by the by... However my menu option is set on the screen as 30 pixels wide.

  If I create the actual image as 30 pixels wide so that the text is very unbalanced and is horrible.

  So if my menu shows 400px by 30px w h and image real must be 800px w h how do I create a good quality image without having such quality terrible 30px?

  I create higher resolution and then somehow reduce the width of the bottom?

  Thank you

  Terry

  Do you use a high-resolution Retina Display?

  Image quality is determined by the total number of pixels in your image - h X w, 325 x 200 500 x 400 vs and the 72 vs 96 ppi vs 300.  So if your screen has a pixel density of high, normal web images may appear grainy on your device but is generally not a problem for the screens with a normal pixel density.

  Consider using the Bootstrap Glyphicons or Fonts-Awesome icons and SVG.

  Open your PSD into illustrator and SaveAs SVG (scalable vector) that is much sharper than bitmaps.

  See the following article:

  A guide to creating a better web of retina - Ivo Mynttinen / User Interface DDesigner

  Nancy O.

• How to get the best image quality when you insert PDF into Word?

  I am able to insert a PDF file as an object in Word, but the image quality is a bit fuzzy.  Is this what I can adjust in order to improve the clarity of the image in Word?

  You can try to extract the images with the help of extract all Images or select only the parameters of the screen recording you get when you save in a DOC, but I think that the general result is that the image recorded with the same resolution as shown in the PDF document. It may be that you simply adjust your screen in WORD. You can look at the picture in WORD and see if it is used at 100% or some other resolution. Bitmaps are not very forgiving if the resolution is changed to the document and not as something other than the small number of fractions of resolution appears change.

• The flattening (or economy without diapers) compromises image QUALITY?

  I'm save a large .tiff with multilayered image, but do not need to access the different layers, so my question is simple, if I can save the image without layers in order to reduce the size, or which would also reduce the image QUALITY?

  Long as you save it as a TIFF, PSD, PSB or PDF, also there is no loss of quality.

  It's perfectly fine in principle, if you are absolutely certain "have really no need to access the different layers later.

  If you have vector layers or text that you need to print, it is much better not to flatten the image like that rasterizes all layers.

  Just stay far, far away from JPEG files, which are deteriorating in quality whenever you save or resave them.

• Problem of image quality when you print the brochure in PDF format

  Hello!

  I searched the whole web, trying to find a solution for my problem, but I couldn't find anything...

  I created a vertical page A5 document in InDesign CS6, filled with high quality photos. Now, I want to print in a brochure (in PDF format) in order to save it and print it in a professional facility.

  The problem is when I do this, the image quality turns out to be terrible...

  I checked my print settings and I can not find something wrong...

  Installation - A4 horizontally, and Graphics - Images - send data - is set to all.

  Is there anything else I can / try? What can I do it wrong?

  Here is a picture of my print settings:

  

  When I export the document normally in format PDF the image quality is fine, but it doesn't have the booklet layout I need, it exports all single A5 pages one after the other. If I try to print this pdf file as a booklet in Adobe Reader, the same thing happens to the images, they lose quality.

  Help, please!

  Thanks :))

  tepatroni wrote:

  Now, I want to print in a brochure (in PDF format) in order to save it and print it in a professional facility.

  Have you checked withthei 'professional establishment' as to what they want. Printers will not, in general, impose you the document. It's their job and they do it in a way that corresponds to the study and the equipment they use for printing.

  That said, your problem with low quality images is probably the default PDF settings. Change them to something useful in Pringter in the Windows properties, or click the settings button in the print dialog box to access the driver from there and set them as you want. I'm sure that when the default installed PDF printer is 'standard' gives you the output of RGB 72 ppi.

• A movie or slideshow of .psd files that preserves the image quality? (v10)

  Hello

  I spent a lot of time creating hundreds of. PSD images that I thought I would open first and create a movie with - incorporating a pause of 5 seconds on each photo.

  The problem is even if the images are superb, the movie looks like shit.  The image and text on the image is blurred.  If I hit the break he straightens up and looks great (just like the original. PSD files).

  This happens in the 'snapshot' film and slide show.

  Please tell me that I don't have to create a PowerPoint slide show to keep the image quality!  Please, I beg you!  I tried it with and without "Autoanalyze" and "autoedit".

  I don't understand, but I know I'm missing something!

  Optionally you can offer guidance will be greatly appreciated.

  If the reading of psd files is the problem (I think), you can try to right click on the monitor and then select the playtback quality to be 'Up' this ensure a display an image complete and do not have the artifacts you mentioned.

  The exported sequence will not have the issues you mentioned regardless of the quality of reading... You can see this or something is broken in PrE10?