UDP is blocked...

There is no work around?

We have developers on various networks of flaky and this causes some hiccups RTMFP development...

With our thanks!

RTMFP is a UDP protocol only.  in general, if UDP is blocked, RTMFP will not work.

Flash Player can talk to/via a UDP - UDP proxy running pre - RFC draft 8 of the TOUR:

https://Tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-behave-turn-08

You can configure Flash Player to use a proxy in mms.cfg (the location varies depending on your platform).  the property in this file is RTMFPTURNProxy =.

Tags: Adobe

Similar Questions

  • Why is the port udp 137 used during a remote desktop session?

    I am currently seeing a lot of messages on my firewall indicating port 137 udp is blocked.  I think that when I use remote desktop to a remote system, which attempts to connect to me via the udp port 137 remote systems.  If this is true, why?  This is necessary or if I can change this behavior?

    Hello

    UDP 137 is used by NetBIOS in Windows 7 file sharing.

    According to what you are doing when you use Remote Desktop on your network, it can call the UDP137.

    If it does not interfere with something functional you need to do, leave him alone. The Job firewall is to block aspects of network traffic. You don't have to feel 'sorry' to him do his job.

    Jack-MVP Windows Networking. WWW.EZLAN.NET

  • The lights blink and the error error message: 0x887dd03a

    I have a printer all-in-One of 2600.  At random, all the control panel lights will be flashing quickly, and display "blue out" and read only this error message "error: 0x887dd03a.  I can always print, scan or copy with the printer, if I hit the power button and let it charge.  But shortly after that work is done, it will start to Flash again and display the error message.  I run a new computer with Windows 7, but this was happening on my old computer running windows XP.  I thought a fresh load of software and CPU would solve the problem, but it still exists.  Any ideas why this might be happening?

    the solution,

    block protocol SMB from your computer to the printer.

    -assign a staic ip address to the printer

    -create two outgoing roles in windows firewall 7 - one for the tcp - one for udp

    -block tcp 139 and 445 on the ip of the printer

    -block udp 137 and 138 to the ip of the printer

    -forget the card slots

    andreashabl

  • VPN - Pix 515e for Cisco router

    I have the following Setup and I can't seem to get the next tunnel. My end is a PIX 515e race 7.2 (4). The other end is a Cisco router-not sure of the model or version of the IOS.

    PIX:

    90 extended access-list allow ip host a.a.a.a host b.b.b.b

    NAT (inside) - 0-90 access list

    correspondence address card crypto mymap 20 90
    card crypto mymap 20 peers set x.x.x.x
    map mymap 20 set transformation-strong crypto
    mymap outside crypto map interface
    ISAKMP crypto identity hostname
    crypto ISAKMP allow outside
    crypto ISAKMP policy 8
    preshared authentication
    3des encryption
    sha hash
    Group 2
    life 86400

    tunnel-group x.x.x.x type ipsec-l2l
    tunnel-group ipsec-attributes x.x.x.x
    pre-shared key 12345

    Router:

    / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Table Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 à 5.4pt 0 à 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;} / * Définitions de style * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Table Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 à 5.4pt 0 à 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

    SDM_5 extended IP access list

    permit ip host b.b.b.b host a.a.a.a

    ISAKMP crypto key 12345 address y.y.y.y no.-xauth

    map SDM_CMAP_1 5 ipsec-isakmp crypto

    Description vpn for laboratory

    defined peer y.y.y.y

    game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA

    match address SDM_5

    I'm running him debugs following:

    Debug crypto ipsec enabled at level 1
    ISAKMP crypto debugging enabled at level 1

    I get the following debug output:

    August 16-04:16:10 [IKEv1]: IP = x.x.x.x, counterpart of drop table counterpart, didn't match!
    August 16-04:16:10 [IKEv1]: IP = x.x.x.x, error: cannot delete PeerTblEntry

    Isa HS her

    IKE Peer: x.x.x.x
    Type: user role: initiator
    Generate a new key: no State: MM_WAIT_MSG2

    Any ideas?

    Thank you

    Dave

    If you see the MM_WAIT_MSG2, which means that her counterpart (the other side) does not answer and this side where you can see the status MM_WAIT_MSG2 sent the first message IKE, however, did not hear of the peer.

    You can check if UDP/500 is stuck on the way between the 2 sites.

    Try running traffic on the other side and see if you also get the same status of MM_WAIT_MSG2. If you do, that confirms 100% 500/UDP is blocked on the way between the 2 sites.

  • LabVIEW block port UDP 6000

    Hello

    I noticed that when LabVIEW (8.6 but before as well) application that uses VISA is installed (by building the Installer) port UDP 6000 is blocked and no other program can use it.

    Does anyone know how to check that the other ports are blocked by VISA?

    Thank you

    Pawel


  • XP Pro SP 3 firewall blocking UDP 137 and 138 even though exception "File and Print sharing" is selected

    I am running XP Pro SP 3 on a working group. I'm trying to access the files from a Windows 7 machine on the same workgroup. But the XP firewall blocking UDP 137 and 138 even though exception "File and Print sharing" is selected. When I disable the XP firewall, all right.

    Here are a few entries in the firewall exception log file:

    2012-06-01 09:53:25 DROP UDP 192.168.2.190 192.168.2.255 137 137 78 - RECEIVE
    2012-06-01 09:53:26 DROP UDP 192.168.2.190 192.168.2.255 137 137 78 - RECEIVE
    2012-06-01 09:53:27 DROP UDP 192.168.2.2 192.168.2.255 138 138 202 - RECEIVE
    2012-06-01 09:53:28 DROP UDP 192.168.2.190 192.168.2.255 137 137 78 - RECEIVE
    2012-06-01 09:53:28 DROP UDP 192.168.2.190 192.168.2.255 137 137 78 - RECEIVE
    2012-06-01 09:53:29 DROP UDP 192.168.2.11 192.168.2.255 138 138 202 - RECEIVE

    I did some research on another site, and I came up with the FIX for this issue. It has to do with the node XP somehow getting ready to type "Peer-to-peer". I applied the fix in this article:

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/903267

    and the problem is now solved.

    Please come back and let everyone know how you fixed the end!

    However, the fact that this has happened and you don't know how concerned me (if it was my machine).

    Here's what I propose for extra cleaning:

    Search for malware:

    Download, install, execute, update and perform analyses complete system with the two following applications:

    Remove anything they find. Reboot when necessary. (You can uninstall one or both when finished.)

    Search online with eSet Online Scanner.

    The less you have to run all the time, most things you want to run will perform:

    Use Autoruns to understand this all starts when your computer's / when you log in. Look for whatever it is you do not know usingGoogle (or ask here.) You can hopefully figure out if there are things from when your computer does (or connect) you don't not need and then configure them (through their own built-in mechanisms is the preferred method) so they do not - start using your resources without reason.

    You can download and use Process Explorer to see exactly what is taking your time processor/CPU and memory. This can help you to identify applications that you might want to consider alternatives for and get rid of all together.

  • Navigation for the AVG firewall Windows XP - network sharing and occasionally be blocked due to uknown UDP outgoing local traffic remotely different ports... Repeatedly enters FilterDevice in the firewall log

    Various involved Ports:
    Local: 257 remotely: 513
    Local: 513 remotely: 6146
    I also saw port 259 and a few others...
    The firewall settings work for various other users, but seem to don't like is not something in my configuration.

    As a member of a domain running Windows XP Pro SP3
    When it blocks the traffic, they are always directed to a remote IP address of a domain within my local network controller. I uninstalled a lot of applications, and made sure I have no services for unix/linux installed.  For a bit, I thought he may have something for security certificates because my computer and user accounts are configured with our local CA... I doubt, however, that is related...

    I also know that my domain name is not the configuration as tight as we would like to see because we had to reduce some of the security settings for old Windows 98 and AS / 400 systems.  So I remember an old key "reg" which might not help:
    Location: HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\lanmanworkstation
    \Parameters
    Key: enablesecuritysignature
    Initial value: 0
    New value: 1
    This changed seemed to help but then after another it reboot started appearing again...

    Amaranth Hello,

    Thank you for visiting the website of Microsoft Windows Vista Community. The question you have posted is related to the area and would be better suited to the TechNet Forums community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the support you want.

    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/categories/

    Keith
    Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
    Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think

  • Looking to block Ports on AirPort Extreme

    I'm looking to block specific ports when you access a particular service online. I the number of ports I need to block already, but I do not know how to block. I use an iMac running OS X El Capitan 10.22.6 and an AirPort Extreme v7.6.7. Any tips?

    To the airport

    By default all IPv4 ports on an AirPort base station are closed (not ' hidden') to the incoming traffic from the Internet, like the base station uses a simple based on NAT "firewall." However, all ports are open going out.

    If you use a service on the Internet that you send the traffic, the return traffic will access specific ports that the application told him, to complete the loop. If your goal is to 'close' this loop, then you will need to port forward that return traffic to a client is no local network as a potential solution. Not sure how your app will be with some communications being blocked.

    Nevertheless, the solution is to port before the unwanted incoming ports to a local IP address that is outside the DHCP for the network scope. By default, the DHCP of the airport service provides addresses in the 10.0.1.2 - 10.0.1.200 range. You would then be the port forward to attack from 201 up to 254.

    For example, if you want to block the 800 port, you would put in place a port card in AirPort Utility as follows:

    • Run the AirPort Utility.
    • Select the base and then station, select change.
    • Select the network tab.
    • Select it '+' plus button under Port settings.
    • Enter a description in the Description box.
    • Public UDP ports: 800
    • Public TCP ports: 800
    • Private IP address: 10.0.1.201
    • Private UDP ports: 800
    • Public TCP ports: 800

    For your Mac

    To block all incoming connections to a specific application, use the system preferences, as follows:

    • System Preferences > Security & privacy > select it '+' plus button to add the application.
    • Select the option "Block incoming connections" for this application.
    • Click OK.

    Note: If you want more control over the software firewall in OS X, you need to look into a third party app that does this. Some of them are: Murus and Little Snitch

  • UDP EDNS packet size

    Hey everybody

    I have a BIND server 9.8.1 - P1 on the local network behind a firewall UTM5 running firmware 1.3.15 - 28.

    My DNS lookups are horribly slow to BIND. Ask the journal I found that server complains that, "after having reduced the size of package UDP EDNS announced at 512 bytes", it can make a successful determination.

    Now, that tells me that the UTM5 cannot accept UDP greater than 512 EDNS packets.

    ISS this correct?

    I also see a lot of these errors:
    error (no valid RRSIG) resolve "prosecure.com/DS/IN": 4.2.2.2 #53

    The maximum size of the DNS default UDP packets is 512. Most of the routers on the Internet will be blocking the packets UDP exceeds this size.

    http://StackOverflow.com/questions/1098897/what-is-the-largest-safe-UDP-packet-size-on-the-Internet

  • free proxy block

    Anyway is to block the use of a free proxy that some people use in browser?

    Maybe I'm missing something, but depending on how tight you want to lock your outgoing traffic, you can block all except the common standard ports very well. In my environment, I block all outgoing except 80 (TCP) traffic, 443 (TCP) and 53(UDP/TCP) (only to the servers of our DNS provider) via LAN WAN outbound rules. If you can get away with it without flipping user companies wanting to use the company to social networks and other network, it eliminates so an important band of shenanigans that can happen (anonymity many of them). It does not block all, of course (80/443 anonymizers work), but it will at least make it more difficult.

    The only time wherever it does not work is if you need to take charge of the protocols/applications that redirect the client computers on a random port on the server (not passive FTP, for example). In any case, the only way to really stop most proxies/anonymizers (as adit said above) is to use the features of the UTM to content filtering.

  • UDP Port forwarding

    I opened the ports on my Airport for HTTP, TCP, and UDP.

    By using the website canyouseeme, I confirmed that the TCP and HTTP ports are open.

    However, the UDP port is indicating 'connection refused '.

    Port forwarding is configured to be the same for each.

    Any thoughts would be appreciated...

    I opened the ports on my Airport for HTTP, TCP, and UDP

    FWIW, only the HTTP protocol is a 'standard' port already assigned. It is port 80. This port can be a type TCP or UDP port. On the other hand, generally TCP or UDP ports vary from 0 to 65535... so your statement «I open ports on my Airport...» TCP and UDP"does not tell us what are the ports really tried to open and for what reason.

    Some ports are blocked by ISPS, so this may be a reason that the method used, canyouseeme, can not 'see' she also open.

    Is your 802.11ac AirPort Extreme router "main"? In other words, it is directly connected to a simple Internet modem via an Ethernet connection between them?

  • Stand-alone application cannot receive UDP message

    Hi all!

    I have a small work of vi (part of a larger program) to receive udp messages sent by another device on the local network. It works well when it is a normal vi, but

    When I built an exe of this vi, I don't see any udp message received by the exe. Someone has an idea for this? Here's my vi and thanks in advance!

    Definitely check the firewall rules. An application is by default not automatically right to create sockets on random ports. Usually, you get a dialog box by the firewall software at first startup of an application, if you want to allow to access network features. But it is easy to close this dialog box without reading carefully and sometimes Windows seems not even to solicit you. And then the firewall rule is normally set to deny network access for the executable.

    For do not push viruses and other malignant software with the nose on the fact that he was blocked, a firewall rule will often calls API succeed but simplyact as if there is no network available.

    And firewall rules are affected depending on the executable name AND location of the executable in the file system. If moving the executable somewhere else will be basically means a new request and requires its own firewall rules.

  • UDP read too Long timeout, Async Custom Dev fail Shutdown

    Hello

    I've got a simple custom UDP for VeriStand receiver device that uses a timed loop. She has an infinite timeout so that I can listen on port constantly. I cancel the deployment every time I cause an error: 307730 Error Message: NI Veristand: one or more asynchronous custom devices did not close properly and has been abandoned by the Veristand engine.

    Does anyone know how to stop the function Read UDP when it expects a package? What's doing VeriStand when she replaces this behavior, for example he closes the network connection, as the unit cancels? The "Stop.vi" of the device model custom runs?

    Similar question for Visa Read with a long time (> 10 s). VeriStand closes the Visa Session? VeriStand just kill the timed loop and leave the rest of the finishing of custom device?

    Please note that if I shorten the timeout to 1 s or less the custom device can cancel the deployment without any problem.

    Thank you

    Brent

    Brent,

    You should have a way to interrupt your UDP activities to check the system status. Open UDP will create the buffer to the data to be received on this port. As long as reading occurs to clear the buffer before too much data overruns the buffer memory capacity, then you should be fine. Leaving a deadline of waiting-1 loop which blocks it is why VeriStand is having to stop the loop.

    You should have a case of time-out period for your operations of UDP/TCP for the periods of low activity in order to check a channel to shut down the device custom.

  • Receiving UDP does not receive messages

    Hello. I have problem with UDP receiver.

    I can receive messages from the same port you write.

    Stream: open vi--> vi--> read vi UDP UDP writing.  Transmitter and receiver usinf th test port.

    When I try to use vi UDP listen port to just read, I get all the data.

    Program flow. I use vi to send the command on the serial port to MCU. Answer MCU return by sending data to the network port using UDP.

    I start vi to listen to a port UDP (see attached), then I sent the order to MCU. I can see the response on Wireshark, but UDP vi does not receive anything.

    I checked the IP address. Lokks all the same. IP address of the PC and decice is the same as when I write and read at the same time. Any other port.

    Any help please.

    Is the port that you want to use to open? For safety that many IT services will be blocked in ports that don't think they are necessary, or don't want to use.

  • How to implement an ethernet without TCP or UDP communication?

    I know there are blocks to transmit/receive data via the Protocol TCP or UDP in Labview,.

    but I need to pass data between one compactRIO and another device that is not NEITHER device.

    They communicate via Ethernet, BUT this unit has its own Protocol (TCP or UDP),

    So just me LabVIEW to transmit raw data via Ethernet without any header (for example TCP or UDP, etc.) because I will deal with it by myself,.

    What is the best work in Labview can I use for this?

    Thank you!!

    None! You must call directly into the OS API Jack for a raw configuration network socket, and then use read() and write() on it. Note that raw sockets are all modern operating systems preferred Office of resources which can only be opened by a process granting access rights. On Windows, it is reserved for processes with administrator rights. In Linux, there are just special access that must be given to a process for this.

    Under cRIO this right of access is probably not a problem, but you may encounter problems that raw sockets are only partially taken in charge there.

Maybe you are looking for