VPN CISCO RV110W fail.

Hello

I have a router Aztech DSL1015EW (S) and Cisco RV100w. Here's my setup.

Phone - RJ11---> DSL1015EW (S) - RJ45---> RV110W

-J' tried to build the portable computer remote VPN connection to RV110W (failed)

-Also failefk quick VPN

-PPTP failed

Port forwarding on DSL1015EW

I don't have the public ip address

I use dydns.

What can I do? Please help me.

Fast VPN error message is "bridge not answer do you expect ot.

PPTP error code is cannot estiblishe to the remote host.

Hello

Hi, thank you for using our forum, my name is Johnnatan I left the community of support to small businesses.

I apologize for your stress, in this case I advise you to check this link with useful information about the VPN fast https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-29399

I hope you find this answer useful,

"* Please mark the issue as response or write it down so others can benefit from.

Greetings,

Johnnatan Rodríguez Miranda.

Support of Cisco network engineer.

Tags: Cisco Support

Similar Questions

  • Configuration VPN Cisco RV110W.

    Hello

    We have a new RV100W router. I would like to use it for iPhone, PC and MAC for you connect via IPSec (QuickVPN) or PTTP.

    Whenever I go to the VPN configuration, it tells me that I need to set up a 10.x.x.1 network. How can I use VPN without doing?

    Thank you!

    Hi bndbrennan,

    Try to change the IP address, set up your VPN clients, and then restore the IP 192.168.1.1. The reason for which the router wants to change is because there are so many routers out there that have 192.168.1.1. If you always try to connect from one of these routers, the connection will fail. We see a lot of people that use 192.168.2.1 and it works fine.

  • Cisco RV110W supports up to 1 VPN policies

    Best regards

    I use a router Cisco RV110W to 20 natoinwide of branches with a central site for interconnection, however, although VPN correctly between a branch and the central location it is not possible to add another tunnel in the RV110W to another secondary site (see photo)

    In the data sheet RV110W it is said that this router supports up to 5 VPN tunnels, but apparently these 5 tunnels are supposed to establish via the software QuickVPN from a computer.

    so: is there a real limit to VPN site to site (router to router) 1 with RV110W?

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Please contact Cisco,

    The RV110w supports only 1 site to tunnel

    Of the data sheet:

    1 tunnel IPSec Site to Site

    The RV130W will allow 10 site to site tunnels, datasheet below:

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/small-business-...

    Best regards

  • Install Cisco Anyconnect failed

    I tried to installed Anyconnect to a computer for VPN access but failed with a rating below.  I read and impossible to get anything out of it.  Can anyone help?

    Hi Edward,.

    Ok thank you. But can you tell us how to install the anyconnect on the machine? Are download you it from the unit head of network VPN (ASA, router...) or you use the package to download from Cisco's Web site?

  • Cisco RV110W

    Hi all

    I have the following question: I have 3 router CISCO rv110w. One of them is the most important for me is in my warehouse. The other two are in my shop. I want to do the first router (in-store) to the vpn server and the other two to be its vpn customers. Can you explain in detail how to proceed.

    Thanks in advance

    Dear Lubo,

    Thank you to the small community of Support Business.

    Please refer to the following document for a "VPN client" configuration on routers RV110W; "

    http://sbkb.Cisco.com/CiscoSB/Loginr.aspx?login=1&PID=2&app=search&VW=1&articleid=2501

    For a step by step over procedure detail consult the Administrator's guide, p.96;

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/routers/CSBR/RV110W/Administration/Guide/rv110w_admin.PDF

    I hope you find this information useful and please let us know if there is any other assistance, we can help you.

    Kind regards

    Jeffrey Rodriguez S... : | :. : | :.
    Support Engineer Cisco client

    * Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.

  • Order of operations NAT on Site to Site VPN Cisco ASA

    Hello

    I have a question about the order of operations NAT on Site to Site VPN Cisco ASA 8.2.x. I have a scenario where the internal IP address of the range 10.17.128.x are NATTED IP public 31.10.10.x. below is the config:

    Tunnel normally passes traffic to dmz - 31.10.11.10, 31.10.11.11 servers.

    But the servers NATTED (10.17.128.x <->31.10.10.x) does not work.

    inside_map crypto 50 card value transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA

    tunnel-group 100.1.1.1 type ipsec-l2l

    tunnel-group 100.1.1.1 General-attributes

    Group Policy - by default-PHX_HK

    IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 100.1.1.1

    pre-shared key *.

    internal PHX_HK group policy

    PHX_HK group policy attributes

    VPN-filter no

    Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec svc webvpn

    card crypto inside_map 50 match address outside_cryptomap_50

    peer set card crypto inside_map 50 100.1.1.1

    inside_map crypto 50 card value transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA

    inside_map crypto 50 card value reverse-road

    the PHX_Local object-group network

    host of the object-Network 31.10.11.10

    host of the object-Network 31.10.11.11

    host of the object-Network 31.10.10.10

    host of the object-Network 31.10.10.11

    host of the object-Network 31.10.10.12

    host of the object-Network 31.10.10.13

    host of the object-Network 10.17.128.20

    host of the object-Network 10.17.128.21

    host of the object-Network 10.17.128.22

    host of the object-Network 10.17.128.23

    the HK_Remote object-group network

    host of the object-Network 102.1.1.10

    inside_nat0_outbound list extended access permitted ip object-group PHX_Local-group of objects HK_Remote

    ACL_INSIDE list extended access permitted ip object-group PHX_Local-group of objects HK_Remote

    ACL_OUTSIDE list extended access permitted ip object-group HK_Remote-group of objects PHX_Local

    outside_cryptomap_50 list extended access permitted ip object-group PHX_Local-group of objects HK_Remote

    Route outside 102.1.1.10 255.255.255.255 30.1.1.1 1

    public static 31.10.10.10 (Interior, exterior) 10.17.128.20 netmask 255.255.255.255

    public static 31.10.10.11 (Interior, exterior) 10.17.128.21 netmask 255.255.255.255

    public static 31.10.10.12 (Interior, exterior) 10.17.128.22 netmask 255.255.255.255

    public static 31.10.10.13 (Interior, exterior) 10.17.128.23 netmask 255.255.255.255

    He started to work when I did another group of object by name PHX_Local1 and added to the list of access inside_nat0_outbound, instead of the object group PHX_Local, as below:

    the PHX_Local1 object-group network

    host of the object-Network 31.10.10.10

    host of the object-Network 31.10.10.11

    host of the object-Network 31.10.10.12

    host of the object-Network 31.10.10.13

    No inside_nat0_outbound access list extended only to allowed ip object-group PHX_Local-group of objects HK_Remote

    inside_nat0_outbound list extended access permitted ip object-group PHX_Local1-group of objects HK_Remote

    Can you please help me understand why group object PHX_Local failed with access-list inside_nat0_outbound, but he began to work with the Group of objects PHX_Local1.

    Also, if you could tell me the order of operations to NAT via VPN Site to Site, it would be useful.

    Thank you

    Kind regards

    Thomas

    Hello

    I think you could have said the original question in a way that could be missleading. In other words, if I understand now.

    From what I understand now, you have the DMZ set up the server that are measured with a public IP address on the real servers. And for those that you have configured NAT0.

    Then you have other servers that do not have public IP addresses themselves, but they are translated on the SAA.

    If this is the case, then the next question would be. The server with the NAT should attend the L2L VPN connection with their real IP or address IP NAT.

    Of course if you configure static NAT for the same servers and NAT0 the NAT0 will always win.

    You have these guests who were not able to use the VPN L2L

    31.10.10.10 10.17.128.20

    31.10.10.11 10.17.128.21

    31.10.10.12 10.17.128.22

    31.10.10.13 10.17.128.23

    IF you want them to go to the VPN L2L with their original IP address then you must configure

    object-group, LAN

    host of the object-Network 10.17.128.20

    host of the object-Network 10.17.128.21

    host of the object-Network 10.17.128.22

    host of the object-Network 10.17.128.23

    object-group, REMOTE network

    host of the object-Network 102.1.1.10

    inside_nat0_outbound list extended access allowed ip-group of objects LOCAL object-group remote

    outside_cryptomap_50 list extended access allowed ip-group of objects LOCAL object-group remote

    IF you want to use the L2L VPN with the public IP address, then you must configure

    object-group, LAN

    host of the object-Network 31.10.10.10

    host of the object-Network 31.10.10.11

    host of the object-Network 31.10.10.12

    host of the object-Network 31.10.10.13

    object-group, REMOTE network

    host of the object-Network 102.1.1.10

    outside_cryptomap_50 list extended access allowed ip-group of objects LOCAL object-group remote

    EDIT: in this case you naturally do not configure any NAT0 for actual IP addresses we want precisely the IP addresses to be visible to the L2L VPN with the IP NAT address.

    Or you can of course use the same "object-group" as currently but change the content in an appropriate manner

    Be sure to mark it as answered if it was answered.

    Ask more if necessary

    -Jouni

  • Check the ISE for the VPN Cisco posture

    Hello community,

    first of all thank you for taking the time to read my post. I have a deployment in which requires the characteristic posture of controls for machines of VPN Cisco ISE. I know that logically once a machine on the LAN, Cisco ISE can detect and apply controls posture on clients with the Anyconnect agent but what about VPN machines? The VPN will end via a VPN concentrator, which then connects to an ASA5555X that is deployed as an IPS only. Are there clues to this?

    Thank you!

    The Cisco ASA Version 9.2.1 supports the change in RADIUS authorization (CoA) (RFC 5176). This allows for the gesticulations of users against the ISE Cisco VPN without the need of an IPN. Once a VPN user connects, the ASA redirects web traffic to the LSE, where the user is configured with a Network Admission Control (NAC) or Web Agent. The agent performs specific controls on the user's computer to determine its conformity against one together configured posture rules, such as the rules of operating system (OS) patches, AntiVirus, registry, Application, or Service.

    The posture validation results are then sent to the ISE. If the machine is considered the complaint, then the ISE can send a RADIUS CoA to the ASA with the new set of authorization policies. After validation of the successful posture and CoA, the user is allowed to access internal resources.

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/Adaptive-Security-Appliance-ASA-software/117693-configure-ASA-00.html

  • Fall of connection Cisco RV110W

    Hi guys,.

    I was wondering if someone could help me,

    I bought a box of Cisco RV110W about a month ago and finally got around to setting up, but I have connection problems and have to reboot the box to make it work again, I am currently under the latest version of the firmware 1.2.0.10.

    I have a PPPOE connection on the WAN port with the correct credentials as the status page shows my IP address internet and WAN light is green, I have also 4 VLAN is configured.

    Trying to access the router outwardly I can't and I have to ask someone to restart while I can, but after a few minutes it will start to play. Y at - it somewhere I can access log files to see if the connection is down on the router.

    Thanks, Nick

    I am pleased to hear that it was a simple solution as the MTU. :)

    I believe you must have a syslog server to obtain complete connects (especially when you have a problem of blocking/restart as you did), although looking at the logs incoming and outgoing can be good for the basic diagnostic.  I hope that you can never look at the logs, now that everything works!

  • Client VPN Cisco router Cisco, MSW CA + certificates

    Dear Sirs,
    Let me approach you on the following problem.

    I wanted to use a secure between the Cisco VPN client connection
    (Windows XP) and Cisco 2821 with certificate-based authentication.
    I used the Microsoft certification authority (Windows 2003 server).
    Cisco VPN client used eTokenPRO Aladdin as a certificate store.

    Certificate of MSW CA registration and implementation in eToken ran OK
    Customer VPN Cisco doesn't have a problem with the cooperation of eToken.
    Certificate of registration of Cisco2821 MSW ca ran okay too.

    Cisco 2821 configuration is standard. IOS version 12.4 (6).

    Attempt to connect to the client VPN Cisco on Cisco 2821 was
    last update of the error messages:

    ISAKMP: (1020): cannot get router cert or routerdoes do not have a cert: had to find DN!
    ISAKMP: (1020): ITS been RSA signature authentication more XAUTH using id ID_FQDN type
    ISAKMP (1020): payload ID
    next payload: 6
    type: 2
    FULL domain name: cisco - ca.firm.com
    Protocol: 17
    Port: 500
    Length: 25
    ISAKMP: (1020): the total payload length: 25
    ISAKMP (1020): no cert string to send to peers
    ISAKMP (1020): peer not specified not issuing and none found appropriate profile
    ISAKMP (1020): Action of WSF returned the error: 2
    ISAKMP: (1020): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
    ISAKMP: (1020): former State = new State IKE_R_MM5 = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

    Is there some refence where is possible to find some information on
    This problem? There is someone who knows how to understand these mistakes?
    Thank you very much for your help.

    Best regards
    P.Sonenberk

    PS Some useful information for people who are interested in the above problem.

    Address IP of Cisco 2821 10.1.1.220, client VPN IP address is 10.1.1.133.
    MSW's IP 10.1.1.50.
    Important parts of the Cisco 2821 configuration:

    !
    cisco-ca hostname
    !
    ................
    AAA new-model
    !
    AAA authentication login default local
    AAA authentication login sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1 local
    AAA authorization exec default local
    AAA authorization sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 LAN
    !
    ...............
    IP domain name firm.com
    host IP company-cu 10.1.1.50
    host to IP cisco-vpn1 10.1.1.133
    name of the IP-server 10.1.1.33
    !
    Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel
    !
    Crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-4097309259
    enrollment selfsigned
    name of the object cn = IOS - Self - signed - certificate - 4097309259
    revocation checking no
    rsakeypair TP-self-signed-4097309259
    !
    Crypto pki trustpoint company-cu
    registration mode ra
    Enrollment url http://10.1.1.50:80/certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll
    use of ike
    Serial number no
    IP address no
    password 7 005C31272503535729701A1B5E40523647
    revocation checking no
    !
    TP-self-signed-4097309259 crypto pki certificate chain
    certificate self-signed 01
    30820249 308201B 2 A0030201 02020101 300 D 0609 2A 864886 F70D0101 04050030
    .............
    FEDDCCEA 8FD14836 24CDD736 34
    quit smoking
    company-cu pki encryption certificate chain
    certificate 1150A66F000100000013
    30820509 308203F1 A0030201 02020 HAS 11 092A 8648 01000000 13300 06 50A66F00
    ...............
    9E417C44 2062BFD5 F4FB9C0B AA
    quit smoking
    certificate ca 51BAC7C822D1F6A3469D1ADC32D0EB8C
    30820489 30820371 A0030201 BAC7C822 02021051 D1F6A346 9D1ADC32 D0EB8C30
    ...............
    C379F382 36E0A54E 0A6278A7 46
    quit smoking
    !
    ...................
    crypto ISAKMP policy 30
    BA 3des
    md5 hash
    authentication rsa-BA
    Group 2
    ISAKMP crypto identity hostname
    !
    Configuration group customer isakmp crypto Group159
    key Key159Key
    pool SDM_POOL_1
    ACL 100
    !
    the crypto isakmp client configuration group them
    domain firm.com
    pool SDM_POOL_1
    ACL 100
    !
    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac 3DES-MD5
    !
    crypto dynamic-map SDM_DYNMAP_1 1
    the transform-set 3DES-MD5 value
    market arriere-route
    !
    card crypto SDM_CMAP_1 client authentication list sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1
    map SDM_CMAP_1 isakmp authorization list sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 crypto
    client configuration address map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto answer
    map SDM_CMAP_1 65535-isakmp dynamic SDM_DYNMAP_1 ipsec crypto
    !
    ................
    !
    end

    status company-cu of Cisco-ca #show cryptographic pki trustpoints
    Trustpoint company-cu:
    Issuing CA certificate configured:
    Name of the object:
    CN = firm-cu, dc = company, dc = local
    Fingerprint MD5: 5026582F 8CF455F8 56151047 2FFAC0D6
    Fingerprint SHA1: 47B 74974 7C85EA48 760516DE AAC84C5D 4427E829
    Universal router configured certificate:
    Name of the object:
    host name = cisco - ca.firm.com
    Fingerprint MD5: E78702ED 47D5D36F B732CC4C BA97A4ED
    Fingerprint SHA1: 78DEAE7E ACC12F15 1DFB4EB8 7FC DC6F3B7E 00138
    State:
    Generated keys... Yes (general purpose, not exportable)
    Authenticated issuing certification authority... Yes
    Request certificate (s)... Yes

    Cisco-ca #sh crypto pubkey-door-key rsa
    Code: M - configured manually, C - excerpt from certificate

    Name of code use IP-address/VRF Keyring
    C Signature name of X.500 DN default:
    CN = firm-cu
    DC = company
    DC = local

    C signature by default cisco-vpn1

    IMPORTANT: I don't have a Cisco IOS Software: 12.4 (5), 12.3 (11) T08, 12.4 (4.7) PI03c,.
    12.4 (4.7) T - there is error in the cryptographic module.

    Hey guys, it's weird that the router is not find cert after IKE is the cert and validates, it is certainly not reason, but I would go ahead and set up the mapping of certificate on this router to force the client to associate with Group of IKE, for that matter, that you need to change your config a bit for use iskamp profiles :

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/12_3t/12_3t8/feature/guide/gt_isakp.html

  • IPSec vpn cisco asa and acs 5.1

    We have configured authentication ipsec vpn cisco asa acs 5.1:

    Here is the config in cisco vpn 5580:

    standard access list acltest allow 10.10.30.0 255.255.255.0

    RADIUS protocol AAA-server Gserver

    AAA-server host 10.1.8.10 Gserver (inside)

    Cisco key

    AAA-server host 10.1.8.11 Gserver (inside)

    Cisco key

    internal group gpTest strategy

    gpTest group policy attributes

    Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec

    Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

    value of Split-tunnel-network-list acltest

    type tunnel-group test remote access

    tunnel-group test general attributes

    address localpool pool

    Group Policy - by default-gpTest

    authentication-server-group LOCAL Gserver

    authorization-server-group Gserver

    accounting-server-group Gserver

    IPSec-attributes of tunnel-group test

    pre-shared-key cisco123

    GBA, we config user group: VPN users. all VPN users in this group. ACS can visit his political profile: If the user in the 'VPN users' group, access ACS.

    When we connect from a VPN Client to the server, all users connect to success. When you see the parser in ACS journal, each user success connect also get

    error:

    22040 wrong password or invalid shared secret

    (pls see picture to attach it)

    the system still works, but I don't know why, we get the error log.

    Thanks for any help you can provide!

    Duyen

    Hello Duyen,

    I think I've narrowed the issue. When remote access VPN using RADIUS authentication we must keep in mind that authentication and authorization are included on the same package.

    Depending on your configuration, the ACS is defined as a server RADIUS (Gserver Protocol radius aaa server) and becomes the VPN Tunnel authenticated and 'authorized' on this server group:

    authentication-server-group LOCAL Gserver

    authorization-server-group Gserver

    As noted above, the RADIUS of request/response includes authentication and authorization on the same package. This seems to be a problem of incorrect configuration that we should not set up the 'permission' in the Tunnel of the group.

    Please remove the authorization under the Tunnel of Group:

    No authorization-server-group Gserver

    Please test the connection again and check the logs of the ACS. At this point there are only sucessful newspaper reported on the side of the ACS.

    Is 'Permission-server-group' LDAP permission when authenticating to a LDAP server so to retrieve the attributes of permission on the server. RAY doesn't have the command as explained above.

    I hope this helps.

    Kind regards.

  • Customer Cisco IPSec vpn cisco ios router <>==

    Hello

    I need to implement ipsec vpn for all users of 10-15. They all use the vpn cisco 5.x client and we have a router for cisco ios at the office. We already have a situation of work for these users. However, it has become a necessity which known only devices (laptops company) are allowed to install a virtual private network.

    I think that the only way to achieve this is to use certificates. But we don't won't to buy certificates if there is a free way to implement. So my question is

    (1) what are the options I have to configure vpn ipsec, where only known devices can properly configure a vpn and all unknown devices are blocked?

    (2) if the certificate is the only way. Can I somehow produce these certificates myself using cisco router ios?

    (3) someone at - it an example of a similar installation/configuration?

    Thanks in advance.

    Kind regards

    M.

    Unfortunately if you connect to the router IOS, there is no other way except using the certificate. If you connect to a Cisco ASA firewall, then you can identify the laptop company using DAP (Dynamic Access Policy).

  • What clients VPN Cisco 2811 supports?

    Is the solution of VPN Cisco 2811 locked customers cisco or that market with other brands too?

    Best regards Tommy Svensson

    Hello

    With the correct IOS feature set, it will support IPsec VPN clients. This includes not only the Cisco VPN client but almost any standard IPsec client.

    In addition, if on the 2811 can accept any browser SSL VPN connections, or even use the AnyConnect SSL client.

    It will be useful.

    Federico.

  • Connection with the client VPN for RV110W problem

    Hi guys: I just installed a RV110W router to my small business and I try to connect via VPN from home client.  I was unable to do so, no matter what I try.  Relevant information:

    1. I can connect to the router via remote very well management, so I know that the router is accessible from the Net.

    2. internal address of the router: 10.81.208.1

    3. active PPTP.  PPTP server IP address: 10.0.0.1

    4 IP addresses for PPTP clients: 10.0.0.10 - 14

    5. two VPN clients added - one with PPTP, with the QuickVPN Protocol Protocol.  Both are enabled (and Yes, I triple checked passwords)

    6 encryption MPPE and Netbios active.

    7 IPSec, PPTP and L2TP all active gateways.

    8 VPN client: 1.4.1.2

    9. computer: laptop running Windows 7 family (64-bit), with the firewall Windows is activated.

    10 home network: 192.168.2.196

    It is causing to tear my hair out.  What Miss me?

    Shannon

    Hi Shannon,

    I am pleased to see that you're progress.

    Shannon Rotz wrote:

    I changed the RM port to 443.  Unfortunately, now I can't connect to the router via browser, either by remote management or from the local network - I get the usual "page cannot be displayed".  How do I get back into the router configuration GUI?

    You should be able to reach the GUI by typing https://192.168.1.1(assuming that you have not changed the default IP address) normally once you replace http (port 80) with https (port 443) the internal router web server automatically will redirect you to the https page if you type http. Open your command prompt and try to do a ping of the IP address of the router to ensure that it still meets this address

    With regards to the VPN client:   Up until I changed the port, the same error message kept coming up, i.e. "Unable to establish connection" (or something like that), with a list of possible reasons why it couldn't connect. Now the message has changed - I'm getting "Server's certificate doesn't exist on your local computer".  If I continue trying to connect, then it says "Activating Policy", followed by "Verifying Network", then "The remote gateway is not responding.  Do you want to wait?"  This is definitely progress, since I never got this far before.

    You are a quarter inch offline. If you look at the log.txt in C:\Program Cisco Small Business\QuickVPN Client, in my view, you will see "Failed to ping router remote VPN! This means that your PC is blocking the ping to the router response. Usually, if you look at this point the status of Client VPN in the router (first of all need to remote management) you will see that your user status is "connected." If the router thinks that the connection is established, but the PC does not work. You might want to try another PC at this stage to verify that it is indeed a problem with your PC. This problem is usually caused by the 3rd party software antivirus/firewall blocking the ping response. Microsoft Security Essentials can do this as well, so if you turn it off. If you do not have another PC to test from, call Cisco Small Business Support and ask a technician, try to connect to the lab. You can find the number to call here

    On an impulse, I tried setting up a Windows VPN connection, i.e. created a new VPN connection in Network and Sharing Center, using a PPTP client ID that I had created.  That connection actually worked, except for one problem:  I can't see the remote network.  If I could solve that problem, I'll just tell the other clients to use a Windows connection rather than QuickVPN.

    Good thought. If you do not see the remote devices, make sure that they do not block VPN connections. (Windows or third-party firewall, antivirus, antispyware) With a connection, PPTP or QuickVPN, you should be able to go to run, type the IP address of the device that you want to connect to (i.e. \\192.168.1.101 ) and see the list of shared folders. After the PPTP connection is established, try to ping the address LAN IP of the router. If it is successful, try to ping a LAN device such as a network printer or a PC. Again, PCs may block ping requests if they have a firewall running watch so for this.

    Answer please if you have any questions.

  • Configuration of VPN Cisco RV220W wireless

    Hello expert support.

    We have a RV220 Wireless Network Security Cisco Firewall.  It is currently configured to provide access only to select users.  Asked me to configure it to provide access to users of hotspots or home networks.  Thought which is on the road, or at home that they would use their home network or a location of hot point to the VPN to the RV220 to access the documents they needed.

    My hypothesis was set up VPN with the users who access the QuickVPN client.  I followed the setup steps, but VPN access failed.

    Anyone who has tried or succeeded in a configuration like that?  I have read a number of posts with users having problems, just configure the VPN and access with QuickVPN.

    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Best regards

    Michael

    Try this first.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/routers/CSBR/app_notes/QuickVPN_an_OL-25680.PDF

    If the problem persists, please call the support help center.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html

  • AnyConnect licenses for Cisco RV110W

    Hi all

    Thank you in advance for taking the time to respond - I tried for the last hour and seek more information on the AnyConnect client for an entry level firewall - CiscoRV110W, but I'm still confused.

    To say simple things, my questions are:

    If I buy this firewall of entry-level VPN connections supports 5 + 5, can users download the AnyConnect client and connect to the VPN for free (once it is set up), or do I have to pay extra for the AnyConnect licenses? How much would that cost?

    My experience with AnyConnect has been so far limited to the end user, use it to connect to the network through the VPN at work, but now I take into account set up something similar for a small office with a few teleworkers.

    Connection of the device:

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/RV110W-wireless...

    I already read the FAQ for AnyConnect, but it is still is not clear.

    Thank you for your time!

    Hi mmihai.toma,

    As far as I know, is not supported on devices RV Anyconnect.  If you want to use Anyconnect you must have a Firewall ASA or IOS, router IO - XE.

    According to the documentation it looks like the only VPN options for the device of RV are: quick VPN, Site to Site, and PPTP.

    It may be useful

    -Randy-

Maybe you are looking for

  • Repair or wait and buy a new MacBook

    Hello people I'm a student I mid 2009 macbook pro unibody 13 inches, which works very well for my computing needs problems are 1. the DVD player does not work that I didn't need it anyway 2. the battery backup is very low as 10 minutes it seems a lit

  • Satellite click 2 P30W Pro is not compatible with the monitor LG 29EA73 Ul

    My LG monitor works perfectly with all my other devices, but it can not detect the signal when I connect a cable HDMI Toshiba whith.I tried all types of resolution for Windows 8.1.

  • Mail blocks on each drag and drop operation

    I click on an e-mail address to move it to a folder, and with the first mouse movement email crashes. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- Process: Mail [7742] Pa

  • Direct filmmaker delete my video!

    For some reason, it asks for me to find my video when I load my project. After it, if I scroll it removes some of the video why (about half) is what is happening?

  • CERT has expired

    Sorry BBRY but this must not happen! The certificate of *. cp5255.pushapi.Eval.BlackBerry.com has expired two days ago! To this effect, I can't use the api push without accepting a certificate expired.