VPN with usernames in the pix firewall

Similar Questions

• Username in the Pix Firewall

  When I do a command 'See logging' in my Cisco Pix Firewall (6.3), I am able to see the message below

  605005: x.x.x.x/33652 for eth1:y.y.y.y/telnet for the user authorized login «»

  In the message above, why the user name is not printed?

  your config has.

  Console telnet AAA authentication GANYMEDE + | RAY | LOCAL '?

• Another tunnel to the PIX firewall Site2Site

  I have PIX 506 Firewall and configured site2site VPN with router on the other side and also remote VPN on PIX and both work well. I want to add an another VPN on PIX site2site with another site router can someone guide me in this regard how accompalish it. I have attached the configuration file.

  Mohammed,

  Please see the attachment; I changed the configuration and added a 2nd peer IPSec of course you will need to change the remote router accordingly too!

  Hope this helps and pls rate post if it isn't.

  Jay

• To block P2P traffic on the PIX firewall

  What will be the mechanism, and how we can block the traffic of P2P applications like eDonkey, KaZaa and Imesh etc on the PIX firewall.

  Hello

  You can find the info here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_tech_note09186a00801e419a.shtml

  I hope this helps.

  Jay

• How to limit the ICMP on the PIX firewall.

  Guys good day!

  I have a dilemma with regard to limiting ICMP users browsing to other networks such as other demilitarized interns.

  I know that, to allow ICMP to pass through interfaces, you will need to create an ACL such as below:

  access-list DMZACL allow icmp a whole

  Users require this config ping a server on the DMZ, but it is a security risk.

  To minimize, I have a group of objects created in order to identify hosts and networks is allowed to have access to the echo-replies.

  Again, this is a problem since many host who extended pings just to monitor the connectivity server and its application.

  Do you have other ideas guys?

  As to limiting the echo answers on the PIX. As first 5 echo request succeed with 5 echo-replies and the rest would be removed.

  This could be done?

  Thank you

  Chris

  Hello.. I don't think you can do this by using an ACL on the PIX, however, you might be able to stop the ICMP sweeps by activating CODES signatures using the check ip command you... For more information see the link below

  Guidelines of use Cisco Intrusion Detection System (IDS Cisco) provides the following for IP-based systems:

  ? Audit of traffic. The application of signatures will be audited only as part of an active session.

  ? Apply to the verification of an interface.

  ? Supports different auditing policies. Traffic that matches a signature triggers a range of configurable

  actions.

  ? Disables signature verification.

  ? Always turns the shares of a class of signature and allows IDS (information, attack).

  The audit is performed by looking at IP packets to their arrival at an input interface, if a packet triggers

  a signature and the action configured does not have the package, and then the same package may trigger another

  signatures.

  Firewall PIX supports inbound and outbound audit.

  For a complete list signatures of Cisco IDS supported, their wording and whether they are attacking or

  informational messages, see Messages in Log System Cisco PIX Firewall.

  See the User Guide for the Cisco Secure Intrusion Detection System Version 2.2.1 for more information

  on each signature. You can view the? NSDB and Signatures? Chapter of this guide at the following

  website:

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/iaabu/csids/csids1/csidsug/SIGs.htm

• a way vpn with asa to the 800 router

  people

  I have a site to site vpn set up between a asa 5540 and a 800 router

  I want only the vpn to be initiated from the asa with the 800 remote listen incoming connections

  I know that I can define the type of connection on the asa as only come but I can find an equivalent command to answer only for the 800 remote

  can anyone point me in the right direction or is it enough to simply configure the asa as are created only for this encryption card

  Thanks to anyone who takes the time to answer

  Hello

  I recommend you configure the tunnel as a dynamic to static tunnel VPN, the ASA will be the static counterpart, so it will be the initiator and the router will never be able to establish the connection.

  The ASA will be a common L2L configuration, but the router will use a dynamic encryption card.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a008051a69a.shtml

  The PIX in the example is old, then you can simply adjust the controls to your current version, the important thing is to understand the concept.

  Please let me know if that answers your question,

  Thank you.

• Event ID: 7024 with error message: "the Windows Firewall service stopped with the error service specific data are invalid.

  Original title: cannot start Service Windows Firewall: Error Code 13

  Hello.

  Anyway, the Action Center has begun randomly telling me that the Windows Firewall is disabled. When I try to start or return to the default settings, it tells me that it is not able to do.

  I went to Services and Windows Firewall is set to automatic, but it is not started. I try to start it and it tells me that it is not able to do the same. The error code is 13.

  I am an administrator.

  MalwareBytes did find and delete a virus named "Disable.SecurityCenter", but after removing that I am still unable to start the Service.

  Can someone help with this problem?

  Edit: The journal ID is 7024 and description:

  "The Windows Firewall service stopped with the error service specific data are not valid... '. ».

  Hello, Connor

  You can try to perform a system restore to before that the problem started. For instructions on how to proceed, see the following ink: System Restore: frequently asked questions

  You can also try running a SFC scan to check (and repair) system corrupt/modified files. To do this, go to start, all programs, accessories, click with the right button on command prompt and choose Run as administrator. In the command prompt, type the following command and press ENTER: SFC/scannow

  David
  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Passive routes with OSPF on the PIX

  Hello

  Having just upgraded my PIX to software v8 finally hoping to participate in OSPF on the network.

  The PIX have all many DMZ I want to advertise on OSPF to remove a * much * of fragile static routes but of course I would * not * advertise or get OSPF of these demilitarized. I thought I could do these interfaces passive - or better still, question:

  router ospf 1
  passive-interface default

  And then exempt only the internal interface.

  However, (unlike IOS) it seems to be without notion of passive in the implementation of OSPF from the PIX - a place where I thought it would be very useful...

  How to distribute the these DMZ on OSPF without advertising OSPF in them?

  I had planned to use:

  redistributed connected subnets

  However, which redistributes things like the public interface of the Internet, I don't want to. In addition, even if there is a way to stop there including the public interface, it seems more prone to the error of the user than passive by default with one exception.

  Any ideas? If this is not the case, can I restrict the interfaces in connected subnets redrawn?

  Thanks for all the ideas!

  Hi Peter,.

  Thank you, Yes... I was suggesting to remove network dmz under the OSPF process commands.  As you said, it used to really do what you want to do with the removal of the static since its disabling ospf for this network.

  Start-up eigrp would seem to be a lot of extra work just to eliminate the static if that's what it will be used for, but it would allow you to make the passive interface that would not accomplish snd/RRs eigrp on the specific interface.

  I just re-read your first message and I think I understand now what you're after - which goes back to your first survey of redistribution... you can redistribute static electricity and use a road map to control what roads you want to redistribute.  You can then remove the networks for the demilitarized zone under router ospf process.

  example:

  access-list ospfredist standard permit 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0
  
  access-list ospfredist standard permit 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
  
  route-map static-ospf
  
    match ip address ospfredist
  router ospf 10
  
    redistribute static subnets route-map static-ospf
  this should redistribute only the statics that you listed above.
  hope this helps a bit.
  -scott

• The upgrade of the PIX firewall

  I currently have two firewalls Pix 515 (v4.4 and v6.2). I want to update the v4.4, but am unable to download the software from Cisco. Whenever I try to download using the link 'download pix software', it times out.

  I have already set up a tftp server and plan on the use of monitor mode to perform the upgrade. I already did a "write net:" to save the current configuration. " In addition, the original configuration remains intact, or they will be lost after the upgrade.

  Thanks in advance.

  Looks like you may have a problem with the download or the browser proxy. Try another host and/or browser and see if it works better.

  Since the PIX 4.4 software and versions later, you can go directly to any newer version of the software. To preserve your config, but it's always a good idea to back it up before an upgrade as you did. The config in the PIX is actually not get converted when PIX is restarted with the new software - what happens the first time you do a "write mem" under the new software, it is so important to remember to do as part of the upgrade process. You can then check the config freshly recorded against your configuration of backup for all differences. In addition, it is important to check the Release Notes before upgrading, but if you have a config PIX relatively simple it will probably be fine. One thing you want to do is migrate away from lines on access lists. Cisco is a utility that allows to convert them for you, and it does a very good job as long as your config is not too complex, so I might suggest to give it a try and see how it works for you. The downloadable version of this utility must be on the same page as other PIX software download, and there are versions for Windows and Sun Solaris.

  Good luck!

• Cannot access the VPN server located behind the corporate firewall.

  The VPN server was created by myself, in my Department. I can access the server from anywhere when I am in my business network. When I'm at home, I can't even ping the VPN server WAN interface. When I try to connect via the cisco VPN client, I get the message ' reason 412: peer remote not responding. "

  The main my company firewall blocks external traffic?

  Should I change anything in the VPN server?

  I heard about port forwarding, but have no knowledge about this. Port forwarding is done on the VPN server or the main firewall?

  Also should I go and ask the company system administrator to enable certain ports for the public IP address that I use for my server?

  I hope you can help

  Concerning

  Yes, quite correct. Please open ESP protocol UDP/500 and UDP/4500 for IPSec VPN.

• How to monitor connections dropped and rejected on the PIX Firewall / ASA?

  I need to monitor the SNMP OID of the connections dropped and rejected on the PIX and ASA firewalls. Is this possible?

  If this is the case, what SNMP OID should I monitor?

  Syslogs and Netflow (introduced in version 8.2) are your options.

  No MIB can give you the numbers of conn.

  PK

• Ping on the PIX firewall

  Is it possible to ping directly from low security high security without translations on a PIX?

  For example, 192.168.2.90 is currently natted to 10.0.0.4 by the pix. I want to ping directly from 192.168.2.4 to 10.0.0.4.

  I can certainly ping directly from 10.0.0.4 to 192.168.2.4.

  Please let me know if you would like to see the complete config.

  I hope I understand your question completely. You try to ping from one interface to another on your PIX. This URL explains how this can be done.

  http://www.Cisco.com/warp/public/110/31.html

• Configuration of the PIX firewall Interface

  Hello

  On a PIX 525 running ver 6.3 4 port 10/100 card installed it will be possible to configure interfaces as follows:

  E0 - inside interface

  E1 - failover stateful Firewall

  E2 - Firewall failover monitoring link

  E5 - outside interface

  I'm basically is unsure as to if it is possible to move the external interface to its default configuration as e0 to E5, and even if it will be possible to specify e0 as the interface instead of the default E1 confiuration inside = inside.

  Another quickie - I guess that with the additional 4 port 10/100 card installed my interfaces will be numbered e0 - e5. Is this correct?

  Thank you.

  Said Cisco documentation is not possible to change the name and the security level of inside interface, but I experience it is possible:

  nameif ethernet1 failover security50

  nameif ethernet5 off security0

  etc...

  I would not recommend doing in a production environment because it would create a lot of confusion...

  525 has two fixed interfaces e0 e1 - card expansion port 4 should therefore be numbered e2, e3 (from left to right)

  M.

  Hope that helps the rate if it isn't

• Outlook web app on the pix firewall

  Hi guru firewall,.

  Can someone here help me install my firewall cisco to work for external outlook web access. I changed a few settings and do turn internally... However I can't access outside.

  That means, when I open outlook web app on our LAN that it works, but when I try to open it via internet ISP I can not open it... "page not found".

  Pls advice how you it is resolved through the configuration of firewall pix if anyone of you has met the same thing.

  Any help is greatly appreciated.

  Best regards

  Jeric

  Jeric,

  I am very surprised to read this thread. I really appreciate your effort to do this task.

  I said, listen to me, don't forget to add a statement static so that this works, but I'm not saying you port coz I'm still looking for it.

  I had a good conversation with our cisco consultant Ken. I show him the config and it's what Ken told me to do.

  We lack this static entry.

  public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface www inside_mail_server www netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  also add to this list of access

  ACL_OUT list access permit tcp any host 203.125.100.246 eq www

  Pls let me know the result. Hope that the system will work.

  PLS, do not forget to 'Clearly Xlate' and save it.

  See you soon.

  Dennis

• Helps to configure the pix firewall 507e for e-mail access

  Dear experts,

  I called our provider cisco and ask for technical help regarding our current problem as we know on our set-up.

  She told me to convey my concern to the Cisco TAC. My friends told me to post it here under discussion Netpro.

  I am writing today to ask a few questions about my pix 506 firewall configuration.

  To give the implementation Details pls find below and attached seizures of the show tech command.

  We have subscribed the service DSL and Singtel give us 2 addresses valid public IP that is 203.125.100.246 255.255.255.252.

  I used 203.125.100.246 for my external interface of my firewall pix and singtel assign 203.125.100.245 to the DSL router. In this case, we will only use PAT for internet connection.

  Currently he works very well our Mail Server is resided in the Singtel Office having the ip address of 165.21.111.22. Not work that we can receive and deliver electronic mail on the internet, and we can also surf the internet.

  Now we intend to put our mail in our own network server, because sometimes we encounter slowness on receiving and sending emails. Pls check on the IP address below

  Our LAN IP address is 192.168.1.X 255.255.255.0

  default gateway, which is the IP address of the firewall pix inside interface is 192.168.1.1

  The new mail server IP address is 192.168.1.4.

  Here's what I've done so far.

  I created a static mapping for my mail server is here

  public static 203.125.100.246 (inside, outside) 192.168.1.4 mask subnet 255.255.255.255 0 0

  and modify the access list to allow smtp on our networks.

  192.168.2.0 ip access list ACL_OUT permit 255.255.255.0 any

  ACL_OUT list access permit icmp any host 203.125.100.246

  ACL_OUT list access permit tcp any host 203.125.100.246 eq smtp

  ACL_OUT list access permit tcp any host 203.125.100.246 eq pop3

  ACL_OUT list access permit udp any host 203.125.100.246 EQ field

  Access-group ACL_OUT in interface outside

  After doing it... I have loss all the internet connection, the email does not work... so I deleted immediately. because it causes network failure.

  I have rather edit it and create a static map like this.

  public static 203.125.100.246 (exterior, Interior) 192.168.1.4 mask subnet 255.255.255.255 0 0

  and modify the access list to allow smtp on our networks.

  192.168.2.0 ip access list ACL_OUT permit 255.255.255.0 any

  ACL_OUT list access permit icmp any host 203.125.100.246

  ACL_OUT list access permit tcp any host 203.125.100.246 eq smtp

  ACL_OUT list access permit tcp any host 203.125.100.246 eq pop3

  ACL_OUT list access permit udp any host 203.125.100.246 EQ field

  Access-group ACL_OUT in interface outside

  Saw what it did not cause a failure of network or interruption. I thought that it will already work with the config, I keep it and this is the current config now... But when I change the POP and SMTP settings so that it points on 192.168.1.4 which is the new mail server on our LAN. his does not work.

  To this day, we are in a discussion with my boss or not possible to create a static mapping on our new mail server address 192.168.1.4 to 203.125.100.246 which is already assigned as external IP address and is used for PAT.

  We are asking your help to know how to set up our internal mail server statically match our public IP address that is already used for PAT.

  Please check attached the tech release see the.

  Thank you very much!

  I'd appreciate your quick response.

  Your truth.

  Dennis Pelea

  Dennis,

  Can you please send to me your configuration full pix (unscrew sensitive information) to [email protected] / * /

  I am puzzled, why this configuration does not for you. I have several clients who use a public ip address for external intf more than several other services that use this single ip address.

  Thank you / Jay