Wait for the mechanism in the parallel execution of packages

Dear all,

I submit two packets in parallel as below, which works very well.

I present this in a shell script which is registered as a front end program.

Front end program completed in a second, while the data are not visible in the tables, the data is visible only when the execution of the package completed.

Please can you suggest a mechanism so that I can make the plsql block in shell script to wait for both the delivery of completed packages.

#!/bin/sh                                                                                 |
. $CUST_TOP/bin/CUST_ID_CM.env
export INFA_USER=$INFA_USER
export userpass=`(echo $1 | cut -f2 -d'"' | cut -d '"' -f3)`
ploadtype=$5 
pyear=$7
#####################################################################
if [ "$ploadtype" = "Restatement" ]; then
sqlplus -s $userpass <<EOF
set heading off feedback off verify off serveroutput on
spool /usr/tmp/tmp_tph_load.txt
DECLARE
  l_cnt NUMBER;
BEGIN
  DBMS_SCHEDULER.CREATE_JOB(job_name            => 'YEARLY_RESTATEMENTS',
                            job_type            => 'STORED_PROCEDURE',
                            job_action          => 'RESTATEMENTS_DATAFEED_PKG.INSERT_RESTATEMENTS_P',
                            number_of_arguments => 1,
                            enabled             => FALSE,
                            auto_drop           => TRUE);
  DBMS_SCHEDULER.SET_JOB_ARGUMENT_VALUE(job_name          => 'YEARLY_RESTATEMENTS',
                                        argument_position => 1,
                                        argument_value    => '$7');
  DBMS_SCHEDULER.ENABLE('YEARLY_RESTATEMENTS');
  DBMS_SCHEDULER.CREATE_JOB(job_name            => 'YEARLY_ACTUALS',
                            job_type            => 'STORED_PROCEDURE',
                            job_action          => 'ACTUALS_DATAFEED_PKG.INSERT_ACTUALS_P',
                            number_of_arguments => 1,
                            enabled             => FALSE,
                            auto_drop           => TRUE);
  DBMS_SCHEDULER.SET_JOB_ARGUMENT_VALUE(job_name          => 'YEARLY_ACTUALS',
                                        argument_position => 1,
                                        argument_value    => '$7');
  DBMS_SCHEDULER.ENABLE('YEARLY_ACTUALS');
  LOOP
    SELECT COUNT(1)
      INTO l_cnt
      FROM DBA_SCHEDULER_RUNNING_JOBS
     WHERE UPPER(job_name) IN
           (UPPER('Yearly_Actuals'), UPPER('Yearly_Restatements'));
    EXIT WHEN l_cnt < 1;
  END LOOP;
END;
/
EOF
#
fi
exit

Your problem is the timing. You can perform the check at DBA_SCHEDULER_RUNNING_JOBS before the entry is actually in there.

Here is an example. I just submitted a PLSQL_BLOCK waiting for 60 seconds.

SQL> DECLARE
  2    l_cnt NUMBER;
  3  BEGIN
  4    dbms_output.put_line(systimestamp || ' - Started');
  5    DBMS_SCHEDULER.CREATE_JOB(job_name            => 'YEARLY_RESTATEMENTS',
  6                              job_type            => 'PLSQL_BLOCK',
  7                              job_action          => 'BEGIN DBMS_LOCK.SLEEP(60); END;',
  8                              enabled             => FALSE,
  9                              auto_drop           => TRUE);
 10    DBMS_SCHEDULER.ENABLE('YEARLY_RESTATEMENTS');
 11
 12    LOOP
 13      SELECT COUNT(1) into l_cnt
 14        FROM DBA_SCHEDULER_RUNNING_JOBS
 15       WHERE UPPER(job_name) IN
 16             (UPPER('Yearly_Actuals'), UPPER('Yearly_Restatements'));
 17
 18      EXIT WHEN l_cnt < 1;
 19      dbms_output.put_line(systimestamp || ' - Waiting');
 20      dbms_lock.sleep(10);
 21    END LOOP;
 22    dbms_output.put_line(systimestamp || ' - Completed');
 23  END;
 24  /
04-DEC-14 02.32.00.075794000 AM -05:00 - Started
04-DEC-14 02.32.00.121862000 AM -05:00 - Completed

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

Now it ends immediately. But you can see that the job is still running.

SQL>     SELECT COUNT(1)
  2        FROM DBA_SCHEDULER_RUNNING_JOBS
  3       WHERE UPPER(job_name) IN
  4             (UPPER('Yearly_Actuals'), UPPER('Yearly_Restatements'));

  COUNT(1)
----------
         1

Now I make my code to wait 5 seconds before the audit

SQL> DECLARE
  2    l_cnt NUMBER;
  3  BEGIN
  4    dbms_output.put_line(systimestamp || ' - Started');
  5    DBMS_SCHEDULER.CREATE_JOB(job_name            => 'YEARLY_RESTATEMENTS',
  6                              job_type            => 'PLSQL_BLOCK',
  7                              job_action          => 'BEGIN DBMS_LOCK.SLEEP(60); END;',
  8                              enabled             => FALSE,
  9                              auto_drop           => TRUE);
 10    DBMS_SCHEDULER.ENABLE('YEARLY_RESTATEMENTS');
 11
 12    -- Wait for a wile before checking
 13    dbms_lock.sleep(5);
 14    LOOP
 15      SELECT COUNT(1) into l_cnt
 16        FROM DBA_SCHEDULER_RUNNING_JOBS
 17       WHERE UPPER(job_name) IN
 18             (UPPER('Yearly_Actuals'), UPPER('Yearly_Restatements'));
 19
 20      EXIT WHEN l_cnt < 1;
 21      dbms_output.put_line(systimestamp || ' - Waiting');
 22      dbms_lock.sleep(10);
 23    END LOOP;
 24    dbms_output.put_line(systimestamp || ' - Completed');
 25  END;
 26  /
04-DEC-14 02.33.09.294256000 AM -05:00 - Started
04-DEC-14 02.33.14.347866000 AM -05:00 - Waiting
04-DEC-14 02.33.24.369777000 AM -05:00 - Waiting
04-DEC-14 02.33.34.389725000 AM -05:00 - Waiting
04-DEC-14 02.33.44.410508000 AM -05:00 - Waiting
04-DEC-14 02.33.54.430561000 AM -05:00 - Waiting
04-DEC-14 02.34.04.450684000 AM -05:00 - Waiting
04-DEC-14 02.34.14.462191000 AM -05:00 - Completed

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL>

Now you can see the code entered in the loop and waited.

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

Latch free waits with the parallel execution
Hello

I have a table in a DB 11.1.0.7 with millions of lines I need of aggregation after a search on each line operation. The operation consisted in the determination of a small, constant lookup table the highest value that is less than a column. So I have this array of so-called transation, with some traits of hundreds:
```
CREATE TABLE ref_trad (
  entry     varchar2(50) PRIMARY KEY,
  id        integer      NOT NULL );
```
and a small function that gets the value of your choice (after an additional mapping):
```
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION translate_num(num IN varchar2)
  RETURN integer RESULT_CACHE RELIES_ON (ref_block)
AS
  nm_id integer;
BEGIN
  SELECT m.number_id
    INTO nm_id
    FROM ref_number_map m INNER JOIN ref_trad t ON (m.block_id = t.id)
   WHERE t.entry = (SELECT max(entry) FROM ref_trad WHERE entry <= num);

  RETURN nm_id;
  
  EXCEPTION
    WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN
      RETURN 0;
END;
```
Now when I try to aggregate the table using parallelism, I get a lot of waits 'latch free '. With 4 parallel sessions for example, looking at the graphs in 'EM, I get about 2.5 sessions on CPU and 1.5 on waiting 'latch free '. I have the impression of reading around that the wait could be due to a hot block in index table of ref_trad or something similar. I tried several things, such as the use of the tables of index_organized or the partitioning of the tiny table_reference, hoping to get more parallelism, without spectacular results. So my questions to those who know it are the following:

-How to determine with precision the cause for waiting latch_free events? (e.g., the hot block, the piece of PL/SQL code, etc.)
Is there some sort of mode of implementation of a standard and efficient lookup table? (I've heard on the loading table in a PL/SQL table, would it be useful? No matter what pointer on how to do this? )
-Why should there be contention in the first place in this case, because all the search logic is read-only?

Thanks for all your help!
Chris
Hi Chris,

-How to determine with precision the cause for waiting latch_free events? (e.g., the hot block, the piece of PL/SQL code, etc.)

Trace your SQL, search slaves PX trace files, look for the settings for event wait - and you here. Another option is to use one of the scripts of Tanel Poder - waitprof.

Is there some sort of mode of implementation of a standard and efficient lookup table? (I've heard on the loading table in a PL/SQL table, would it be useful? No matter what pointer on how to do this? )

Not sure about a 'standard', but it's a good thing at least do a table index.

-Why should there be contention in the first place in this case, because all the search logic is read-only?

Since Oracle should have the means of access of sinchronizing to a shared structures - LMS - since they are used simultaneously by several processes.

A good thing to make your faster SQL is to get rid of PL/SQL - it's not a good thing to use SQL [even with RESULT_CACHE | http://www.pythian.com/news/598/oracle-11g-query-result-cache-rc-latches]. Write your logic in a single pure SQL, it might be very beneficial even without special setting.

While trying to see Planner installation and operation, the test in local mode, the EXECUTION fails with message "Waiting for the number of virtual machines to register.

While trying to see installation and operation Planner, the test in local mode with only 1 VM the EXECUTION fails with message "Waiting for the number of virtual machines to register.

There may be a lot of problems in the desktop VM. Agent service see Planner is not running in VM Office. You can check in the event viewer to see what kind of error occurs. The most usual error missing file IP.txt c; drive or harness IP in the IP.txt produce if there is.

Looking for a Boolean function similar to or, but do not wait for the second entry in case he gets a 'real' a single entry

my program works in 2 processes in parallel inside a while loop and should stop when one of them ends.

How can I do? Uses the function 'Or' wire loop the stop condition will not do the job, waiting for the two processes to give their comments before running.

What I really need is a function that waits until she gets a 'true' through one of its entry and then executes without waiting than the other.

Y at - it such an option?

If not, does anyone have an idea how to achieve what I have described here?

Thanks in advance!

What you need is a "not synchronous or", i.e. "do something if Item 1 becomes real GOLD point 2 becomes true. One way that comes to mind to do is with a design of producer/consumer model (event), where the consumer is a State Machine with a shutdown state. Get 1 point to trigger an event (perhaps using a user event or property Value Change (follow the signs)) when it turns out true, and have it send to the consumer the Stop State. Download point 2, to do the same thing. Now one of them becoming true will cause the shutdown state be registered (without taking care of doing the other element), in other words, that becomes a real, (consumer) loop stops.

Bob Schor

Enter the following command without waiting for the current order to fill

There is a switch to use that will enter a powercli command without waiting for the command to finish running. Can someone please tell me what the switch is?

Hello, MNKrantz

You can use the parameter - RunAsync for several of the PowerCLI cmdlets. This will cause continuous execution to the next statement once the command is run.

You can view the cmdlets are supported the RunAsync parameter using the parameter - ParameterName to Get-Command, which was introduced in v3 PowerShell. So, for example, to search for these Core PSSnapin cmdlets:
```
Get-Command -ParameterName RunAsync -Module VMware.VimAutomation.Core
```
Enjoy.

SRM does not wait for the guests of the DPM enabled

Hello
We are testing our environment vsphere 5/SRM and essentially 5, everything goes very well except for wake up initiated by the SRM to the DPM active guests.
--------------------------------
The SRM 5.0 doco States:
SRM temporarily disables DPM for the cluster, and ensures that all guests there are lit before recovery begins. After the recovery or the test is completed, SRM reactive DPM for the cluster, but it hosts are found in the current state of execution while DPM is able to feed them downwards as needed.
--------------------------------
The question that we see is that SRM send indeed wake up for guests in mode standby and milestone of recovery as a success. The problem is that SRM does not wait until the guests are completely turned on before before feeding on the VMs. The day before hosts to wake the system correctly storage access newly presented no problem. The problem is that the bubbles to test network is not created on the hosts of the day before and no VMs are assigned to these hosts during the entire test.
That said, I checked the advanced settings and I cannot find a setting that will force SRM to wait for the standby hosts to be fully integrated in the cluster before you perform additional steps.
Everyone knows this behavior? Am I missing a setting somwhere? My fear is that this behavior will happen during a real failover and potentially cause problems.
Thank you for your time,
Smokey

Hello

This should not happen.

Can you please open a SR, download bundle Journal, engineers will be able to understand what is happening?

Once you open a case, display the number of SR.

Michael.

Ive been waiting for 20 minutes waiting for the consultant to apple. Must be a lot of problems apple these days

Ive been waiting for 20 minutes waiting for the consultant to apple. Must be a lot of problems apple these days

A twenty minute wait is not at all unusual.

Delay (30000 milliseconds) waiting for the SNMP service to communicate.

When I start the SNMP service in Windows Server 2003 Enterprise 64-bit (SP2), the event ID 7009 (Timeout (30000 milliseconds) waiting for the SNMP service to communicate.), kindly help me to solve this problem.

Hello

Note that your computer is under domain, you must contact the TechNet forum, where we are the support technicians who are well equipped with knowledge on the issues of domain, do please visit the link provided below.

http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/winserverfiles/threads

remote desktop hang at 'Please wait for the system event notification' during logoff

When I disconnect a remote connection, sometimes the GET logoff screen stuck at "Please wait for the system event notification" next time I try to open a session.
This can also happen if that I disconnect the user, but the user seems to weigh on this same screen as well.

There is a particular difficulty for this? I can connect as long as administrator to another account, I can't kill connection attached somehow to be registered in the next time?

Thank you

Hello

I suggest you to take a look at the answer in this thread and check if it helps.

http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/windows_vista-security/Sens-could-not-connect-to-the-system-event/4e5a04e9-88f8-4017-9416-2ca67c5ce7c5

Hope this helps,

When I turn my laptop I have wait for the screen to come, or I have to wait for it to connect to the internet, what I do for this

I have a computer gateway laptop and when I turn it on, I have to either wait for the screen to appear or for my laptop to connect to internet, I tried several different things, and none of them seem to work.before id turn on my laptop and within seconds it would connect, now it seems that it takes forever to connect. Thank you

Hello

1. any hardware or software changes made recently before the problem?

I suggest that you follow all the steps in this article to resolve the problem.

Optimize Windows Vista for better performance
http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/optimize-Windows-Vista-for-better-performance

Start stuck on "Please wait for the Local Session Manager."

I would say that this problem started a couple of days. Went to start my laptop (Toshiba) and he sat on the "Please wait" message forever.

Had no problems to start in safe mode. Looked up various ways of addressing the problem.

Was able to change the resume date and back a few weeks ago. Still no luck. Happened to read something on a printer Epson being perhaps the problem driver (it was installed a day before the date of restoration chosen). Uninstalled the drivers, computer still does not start.

Tried restarting running. I do not have the CD it came with Vista, but it was an option when you hold F8 during startup (I think?) Couldn't find any problems.

Ran check on memory. No problem either.

Changed settings for a verbose startup and ran a Diagnostic startup - all good for this. Then tried selective startup load system services... This is when the error occurs. When starting, it hangs on "Please wait for the Local Session Manager" and does nothing more.

I looked in the event viewer to see what came that time and a couple mistakes were:

Event ID 6000: winlogon notification subscriber was unavailable to handle a notification event.

Event ID 7026: the next (s) start or start failed to load system
spldr
Wanarpv6

It would be very useful for me not having to run my computer in safe mode automatically all the time, although it is useful that I at least have that option. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Hello

1. by chance your computer is connected to a domain environment?

2. as you mentioned in your article that you tried the selective startup, I want to confirm if you have disabled the services left 3rd after hide Microsoft services?

If you did not disable these services make sure you disable and then check if it works.
See the article below for more information.
How to troubleshoot a problem by performing a clean boot in Windows Vista or in Windows 7
http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135
Note: When the diagnosis is complete, don't forget to reset your computer to normal startup. Follow step 7 in the above article.

I hope this helps.

Thank you, and in what concerns:
Shekhar S - Microsoft technical support.

Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.
If this post can help solve your problem, please click the 'Mark as answer' or 'Useful' at the top of this message. Marking a post as answer, or relatively useful, you help others find the answer more quickly.

Please wait for the customer to political group - stop questions

Hello

I have problems with the closing of a machine. When the machine is connected to the corporate network, everything works fine. However, if the computer is connected to the VPN (1 hour or more) it is always suspended when it stops. First step in the shutdown process is:

Please wait for the system event Notification service.

This change after 3 minutes exactly. Next step:

Please wait for Group Policy client windows 7

is never exceeded (even after a few hours). Machine never off.

Under newspapers there are always these 4 events when the machine stops in vain:
1. 6005: the winlogon notification subscriber takes a long time to handle the notification event (Logoff).
2. 4627: the event COM + a system expired attempt to fire the method of logging on the event {D5978650-5B9F-11D1-8DD2-00AA004ABD5E} class for the Publisher and the Subscriber. The Subscriber has not responded within 180 seconds. The full name of the subscription is "ISensLogon2". The HRESULT is 80010002
3. 6006: the winlogon notification subscriber took 180 second (s) to handle the notification event (Logoff).
4. 6005: the winlogon notification subscriber takes a long time to handle the notification event (Logoff).
Sense has expired after 3 minutes while there is no event 6006 for GPClient and machine is stuck there for centuries (Please wait for the customer to group policy). I noticed in the system logs that before the machine hangs during the shutdown process there are these errors and warnings:
- 5783: the session configuration for the Windows NT or Windows 2000 Domain Controller \\server for the domain X is not admissible. The current CPP of Netlogon call on \\machine to \\server was canceled.
- 1014: name resolution for the name of the server has expired after none of the configured DNS servers answered.
- 131: NtpClient could not set a domain peer to use as a source of time due to the DNS resolution error on ". NtpClient will try again in 3473457 minutes and double the reattempt interval thereafter. The error was: the requested name is valid, but no data of the requested type was found. (0x80072AFC).
There is more than 1014 events for different servers and some 131. 5783 is always alone.

I did a group policy log, because I thought that I will be able to see where the machine stuck. Below you can see the part of the newspaper GPSVC when the machine stops in vain:

GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: incoming with the event 0xe58
GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asynchronous recording is in progress
GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: cancellation pending appeals
GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0x71a
GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: cancelled waiting for calls
GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: dating dwStatus = 0 x 0
GPSVC (438.1a04) 21:31:24:327 waiting for user group wire political end.
GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: incoming with the event 0xe10
GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asynchronous recording is in progress
GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: cancellation pending appeals
GPSVC (218.C88) 21:31:24:327 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0 x 525
GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0x71a
GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: cancelled waiting for calls
GPSVC (2d4.9C8) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::OnNotificationTriggered: Completenotification failed with 1317
GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: incoming with the event 0xdcc
GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: incoming with the event 0x20cc
GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asynchronous recording is in progress
GPSVC (2d4.9C8) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::OnNotificationTriggered: Completenotification failed with 1317
GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: incoming with the event 0xd90
GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asynchronous recording is in progress
GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asynchronous recording is in progress
GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: dating dwStatus = 0 x 0
GPSVC (218.D48) 21:31:24:342 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0 x 525
GPSVC (218.D48) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::OnNotificationTriggered: Completenotification failed with 1317
GPSVC (218.1c04) 21:31:24:327 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0 x 525
GPSVC (218.1c04) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::OnNotificationTriggered: Completenotification failed with 1317
GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asynchronous recording is in progress
GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: dating dwStatus = 0 x 0
GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: entering with the event 0 x 2100
GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asynchronous recording is in progress
GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: dating dwStatus = 0 x 0
GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: entering with the event 0 x 1264
GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asynchronous recording is in progress
GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: dating dwStatus = 0 x 0

I excluded 1 GP machine and left on the VPN for a few hours, several times. He always stopped correctly.

However I tried with the VPN disconnection before turning off the machine, I even turned off WiFi but machine still hanging. If I tried to get GP results it takes ages before stopping the machine and he's stuck in the step "to get the user name. Gpupdate/force will never update policy (it stops at policy update...). I tired with the installation of different patches that has not solved the problem.

I think that there is that DNS issues while the machine is on VPN which led the GP cannot be applied. When the machine tries to close it is always somehow connected. There is no problem with the connection, no GP application script when the user disconnects, not roaming profiles.

Does anyone have the same problems? All machines are Dell with Juniper NC (VPN).

Thank you

Hello

The question you posted would be better suited in the TechNet Forums. I would recommend posting your query in the TechNet Forums.

TechNet forum: For Windows 7

Hope this information helps.

BlackBerry Q10 in waiting for the new Q10 hit sprint but what will happen to my email?

Currently, I am waiting for the new Q10 hit sprint. but I hear that I have will no longer be able to use my email with the new blackberry blackberry.net. I currently use it as my email address. 1 it's true they won't E-mail blackberry and if so what steps do I need to take to make a smooth transition?

1. Yes, the blackberry.net email is no longer available... and quite honestly, in my opinion, it's a good thing. Blackberry.net email is not available elsewhere ON your BlackBerry, you can view it on the handheld device itself and no backup otherwise. Get a free gmail, yahoo or Outlook.com account.

2. read this: Article ID: KB33260 (hosted) BlackBerry e-mail address reference for BlackBerry OS 10

Then, create and start using another free email account now. When you finally go to the thread at BlackBerry10, you will have your solution in place for shipping the blackberry.net email account.

waiting for the task to the end host window.

My computer startrd to show, when I restart or shutdown windows 7, I get a message saying that windows is waiting for the task host window to end what it means...?

Hi Sanaaalsadouni,

Thanks for posting your question in the Microsoft Community forums.

The TASKHOST is a generic process, which acts as a host for the processes that are running DLL instead of exe files. Up TASKHOST checks the part Services of the registry to construct a list of services focused on the DLLS it needs to load, then load them.

I suggest you try the procedure described in the article and see if it helps.

Why my computer won't turn on or off quickly?
http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/why-wont-my-computer-turn-on-or-off-quickly

See the article for more information.

See details about your computer's performance using Task Manager
http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/see-details-about-your-computers-performance-using-Task-Manager

Hope this information helps you. If you need additional help or information on Windows, I'll be happy to help you.

new SSD HP Pavilion HPE win 7 home Premium Error: Driver_Power_State_Failure Bluescreen from 30 to 45 minutes waiting for the stop down.

Hello all, there

I recently installed a new SSD in a HP Pavilion HPE with windows 7 Home premium. After this event I get bluescreen Driver_Power_State_Failure after about 30-45 minutes waiting for the computer to stop. I have a minidump file if this will be useful and I would be very grateful if someone could help me solve this problem :D

Minidump: http://www.mediafire.com/?hy7so6n9af5f73v

I hope this helps and all support is most appreciated!

The tihub3.sys seems to be in question:

BUCKET_ID: X64_0x9F_3_POWER_DOWN_IMAGE_tihub3.sys

The tihub3.sys, which is dated January 14, 2011, is a Texas Instruments USB 3.0 driver so try to update this driver by installing the next update:

http://h10025.www1.HP.com/ewfrf/WC/softwareDownloadIndex?softwareitem=CP-108667-1&CC=UK&DLC=en&LC=en&os=4063&Product=5144370&sw_lang=

Wait for the mechanism in the parallel execution of packages

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for