What is a PKI?

Similar Questions

• What are the "keys of PSM private' [Options-Advanced-certificates-security] *? What happens if I "load"?

  By virtue of certificates of the Advanced tab "Safety devices" apparently already in mozilla... but not "responsible". In these safety devices is called «...» The private keys for PSM"that I have the OPTION 'Load', but I can't find any explanation as to what it is (I can guess, but since it is not"loaded"already, I don't think that it has nothing to do with"Private browsing").
  What happens if I have to "load" all (there are others beneath "security devices, also * '), or that *"Security device"..? What function does?

  You need to do nothing. These are part of Firefox and are active.

  • Built in Modules of roots - root certificates used for secure access.
  • Security software - used by the Firefox password manager.
  • NSS internal PKCS #11 - built-in library to manage cryptographic measures that are required for secure connections and encryption names and passwords.

  Other information, including the private keys for PSM (under 'security device' and 'software security device' here - https://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/psm/help_20/glossary.html#1032045 )

  See also:

  • http://www.Mozilla.org/projects/Security/PKI/NSS/overview.html
  • FIPS - https://developer.mozilla.org/FIPS_Mode_-_an_explanation

• Failed to load HTTPS via PKI

  I had many problems to PKI certificates to work correctly on my MBP. My problem is that I use PKard to install to INFRASTRUCTURE certificates to Government US of an ACC on my Mac I use a MBP (late 2012) and an iMac (mid 2011). Until a few weeks ago, I had no problem. Two Macs running the latest updates of the Apple software.

  But now my access to some sites of ICP MS SharePoint is a failure. Not blocked - Safari just tells me that it doesn't have the secure connection. Access multiple ICP MS SharePoint sites, they are controlled by separate domains. And it's only one MS SharePoint site that fails to establish a secure connection, the other charges without any problem. To make matters even more confused, as what is happening only on my MBP, access to the ICP MS SharePoint sites in a field works fine on my iMac.

  I got a new CAC at roughly the same time as the problems are happening. But in the past, it is never presented this as a problem - I automatically delete my certificates PKI of Keychain Access and then reload them using the wizard of PKard (see below). I'm sure I'm missing something with that - but I am at a loss to explain what it is exactly as I can still access ICP MS SharePoint sites in this particular area of my iMac.

  Two Macs access the Internet via my home wi - fi. I tried to access the Internet via a hard line for the modem (CAT5 cable) with two Macs, the problem repeats. I also have Internet access during a connection attached to my iPhone 6 s more. The problem is repeated here also (I test this by attaching my MBP and iMac).

  -I don't think that this is due to Apple by pushing a sort of up-to-date security - that I can access the site of the ICP MS SharePoint on my iMac. It would be a possibility, if it proceeded on two Macs. The same applies to the SharePoint side - I talked (by e-mail) to the admins for the site that I have problems to access to, there is nothing wrong with my permissions. In addition, my PKI certificates work very well with Outlook Web Access (OWA).

  -J' added the specific ClicktoPlugin and Ghostery area. I also tried to disable completely, neither worked (ClicktoPlugin has to interfere, but I figured why not try).

  -J' disabled the GlimmerBlocker entirely. This had no effect.

  -J' created a rule to allow all connections from the area of Little Snitch, but also to disable completely. This had no effect.

  -J' disabled IPv6 via a Terminal, Ethernet and Wi - Fi. This had no effect.

  -J' disabled each component of Intego VirusBundle X 8 and also uninstalled completely. This had no effect.

  -J' deleted and reloaded my my ACC using PKard PKI certificates. This had no effect.

  -J' turned off and turned back on the firewall of Mac. This had no effect.

  -J' deleted all the files of security of Safari preferences ( ~/Library/Preferences/ ). This had no effect.

  -J' followed a recommendation in this thread (link to this post) on the definition of certain certificates not confidence, trust, system default, nothing worked. I also did this for my US Government INFRASTRUCTURE certificates, same inability to establish a secure connection.

  Any help would be appreciated. I use my MBP for work (I still haven't access to a computer in the U.S. Government) and need only to access OWA and MS SharePoint sites. It's a pain to have at home by car (1/2 hour drive) just send an e-mail or update a SharePoint site.

  You can use another browser like Chromeor Firefox ?

• Satellite C650-PKI comes with an internal microphone?

  I had my C650 PKI for several months, but have barely had time to try Skype.

  Internal Mike are not not in the language options. I was told when I bought the laptop he had an internal microphone, but not webcam.

  However I can't get the mike to work if there is one, then wonder a. This portable version has a microphone? and B.

  If I accidentally deleted the software what should I try to install?

  Hello

  > This portable version has a microphone?

  I can't find the model of the laptop Satellite C650-PKI.
  Are you sure that the number is good? What is the full number of this laptop model?

  In General, the internal mic belongs to the webcam so I think that the internal MIC is not available if the webcam is not available.

  > However I can't the microphone to work if there is a
  Usually the Skype should automatically recognize the microphone.
  In Skype settings, you should be able to choose the microphone; an external or internal (as appropriate). If this is not possible, then I guess that the laptop has no internal microphone.

  By the way; in Control Panel-> sound-> recording tab, you should see the available micro device

• Anyone of you happen to know what is the difference with a certificate in certificate authorities roots of trust?

  Hi all

  I am trying to solve the mystery of the ICP and have a question about the certificate stores, it would be very cool to have answered. Anyone of you happen to know what is the difference with a trusted certificate root, Enterprise Trust, intermediate Certification authorities CAs, publishers, to the third-party root CA, Active Directory object and so on?

  And does it matter where the physical store? Is there a difference if you use the registry, Local computer, group policy, AIA and so on?

  I noticed that you use the CA store root of trust to validate the server self-signed https, but apparently not so simple with tokens, access control with the EAP protocol network and so on.

  Best regards
  Alex

  Hi Alexander,.

  Thanks for posting your query on the Microsoft Community.

  With the description, I understand that you have a question about the certificate stores on your Windows 7 computer. I will certainly help you to the query.

  I suggest you refer to the of the items listed below and check if this is useful:

  Operating a Windows PKI: Certification Authority certificate life cycle and renewals

  https://blogs.technet.Microsoft.com/xdot509/2013/05/27/operating-a-Windows-PKI-certification-authority-certificate-lifecycle-and-renewals/

  ICP-the key usage attribute

  https://msdn.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/Windows/desktop/ms679125%28V=vs.85%29.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396

  If the link above is not enough, then please visit the link below to post your query in the TechNet forums:

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?category=w7itpro

  Hope this information is useful. Please come back to write to us if you need more help, we will be happy to help you.

• Name of the PKI trustpoint client?

  I have two routers directly connected to g0/0 R2 R1 g0/0 lab.

  I have IPsec with preshared keys configured and everything works fine.

  I just finished setting up R1 as the CA PKI server and created a better priority isakmp policy to use when certificates are configured finally between R1 and R2.

  My next task is to configure R1 also as client PKI.

  I ran crypto key generate module general key of rsa 512 - everything is good, no problems yet.

  Now I need to create a trustpoint to the CA server and this is my question-

  Can what name be used - which means that what I have to use the same name that the server CA [R1-CA] or any other name of the ol is well?

  My config for R1 below.

  Thank you again once - I will get it working soon - I hope!

  Frank

  R1 #sh run
  start the flash system: c2800nm-advsecurityk9 - mz.151 - 2.T1.bin
  !
  clock timezone IS - 5 0
  summer time clock IS recurring
  !
  IP source-route
  !
  IP cef
  !
  IP TEST domain name. LAB
  IP host 192.168.1.1 R1
  host IP 192.168.1.2 R2
  !
  cryptographic pki R1 - CA server
  database level complete
  name of the issuer cn = R1 - CA UO = Point to point
  EMP flash url database:
  Crypto pki token removal timeout default 0
  !
  Crypto pki trustpoint R1 - CA
  crl revocation checking
  rsakeypair R1 - CA
  !
  R1 - CA crypto pki certificate chain
  certificate ca 01
  3Y82YA98 3Y82YA42 AYY3Y2YA Y2Y2YAYA 3YYDY6Y9 2A 864886 F7YDYAYA Y4Y5YY3Y
  223A2Y3Y AEY6Y355 Y4Y3A3A7 523A2D43 4A2Y4F55 3D5Y6F69 6E742D74 6F2D7Y6F
  696E743Y AEA7YD3A 3Y3A3Y32 363 3335 3835325 HAS A7YD3A33 3A3Y3235 A 3, 333538
  35325A3Y 223A2Y3Y AEY6Y355 Y4Y3A3A7 523A2D43 4A2Y4F55 3D5Y6F69 6E742D74
  6F2D7Y6F 696E743Y 5C3YYDY6 Y92A8648 86F7YDYA YAYAY5YY Y34BYY3Y 48Y24AYY
  B5467D77 A2FYA8A2 YC3ABAFY [not the real key] 8976CBA5 C3522D4F E43629EY
  YC9C5AB8 F397F99F 7E83AYA6 36A2A526 BF2B8552 4A9F4CC3 AAY6EY4F 4B6AE4AD
  Y2Y3YAYY YAA3633Y 6A3YYFY6 Y355ADA3 YAYAFFY4 Y53YY3YA YAFF3YYE Y6Y355AD
  YFYAYAFF Y4Y4Y3Y2 YA863YAF Y6Y355AD 23Y4A83Y A68YA4CE FCCC6448 DFF9B52A
  6BC29CBD BF3DAA93 D6DBAA3Y ADY6Y355 ADYEY4A6 Y4A4CEFC CC6448DF F9B52A6B
  C29CBDBF 3DAA93D6 DBAA3YYD Y6Y92A86 4886F7YD YAYAY4Y5 YYY34AYY 28A92EC2
  AEBYE76D 9A5AA4D2 7529FAA4 B44CC6CB 8773E5EA 894A48E6 E6C6A3B4 598B 8734
  2A32F838 3424DY46 3C74BY6C AAAB8AFD 926YFCAA B5C87AA5 92BC4Y38
  quit smoking
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 10
  BA 3des
  Group 2
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 20
  BA aes 256
  preshared authentication
  Group 5
  .
  .
  . blah blah blah

  You must use a different name. The trustpoint with the same name is automatically created by CA server and you should not change it.

  cisco1 Server cryptographic pki
  database level complete
  name of the issuer CN = cisco1.cisco.com L = RTP C = US
  CRL life 24
  certificate of life 200
  Life 365 ca-certificate
  CDP - url http://192.168.1.2/cisco1cdp.cisco1.crl
  !
  Crypto pki trustpoint cisco1
  crl revocation checking
  rsakeypair cisco1
  !
  Crypto pki trustpoint test< this="" is="" trustpoint="" which="" is="" used="" for="" get="" cert="" from="" local="" ca="">
  Enrollment url http://192.168.1.2:80
  IP 192.168.1.2
  revocation checking no

  bhnd-7600 #sh cry cert ca
  CA
  Status: available
  Serial number of the certificate: 01
  Use of certificates: Signature
  Issuer:
  CN = cisco1. Cisco.com L = RTP C = US
  Object:
  CN = cisco1. Cisco.com L = RTP C = US
  Validity date:
  start date: 17:34:02 UTC on October 26, 2010
  end date: 17:34:02 UTC on October 26, 2011
  Trustpoints associated: test cisco1

  Certificate
  Object:
  Name: bhnd - 7600.cisco.com
  IP address: 192.168.1.2
  Status: pending
  The key usage: general use
  Application for fingerprint MD5: 439016A 1 EF93250E 5F870E5F 13DAADA3
  Application for a certificate fingerprint SHA1: 26CC73B3 8AECADD0 C5045B45 3BDC0A8F B636451E
  Related Trustpoint: test

• Crypto pki Server SH on fails on CA no

  The command ' show cryptographic pki server "provides only valid output during execution of the
  order on the CA server as shown below.

  Is this OK or I do something wrong?

  SPOKE1#sh cryptographic pki SERVER-CA Server
  % Cannot find Certificate Server to label CA-SERVER

  CA-SERVER#sh cryptographic pki SERVER-CA Server
  Certificate Server CA-SERVER:
  Status: enabled
  Status: enabled
  Configuration of the server is locked (enter 'closed' to unlock)
  Name of the issuer: CN =CA-SERVER, OU = DMVPN, O = LAB, L = Lonny-Bin, ST = AA, C = HOME
  Cert CA footprint: A # # # #.
  Licensing mode: manual
  Last serial number of the certificate issued (hex): 1
  CA certificate expiration timer: 11:57:05 EST October 3, 2012
  CRL NextUpdate timer: 11:57:00 GMT October 18, 2010
  Current main repository: usbflash0:
  Database level: Complete - CERT issued all written as .cer

  TKS

  Frank

  Hi, Frank:

  What you have observed, this is the expected behavior, this command is valid only on a CA IOS server.

  Thank you

  Wen

• DMVPN + PKI AAA

  Hi all

  I have a question about the DMVPN hub double and rays on the public internet scenario.

  I'm going to use PKI AAA authentication and I understand that to register a ray that has never been connected to our office LAN and just be deployed remotely at the remote location that I would need to have my CA server be exposed to the internet and the public of the CA server ip address must be configured under "list URLs" on the rays.

  To work around this problem, I could get all rays unpacked and registered with their automatic certificates to the office first and then get deployed to remote locations.

  But another question, is that if the rays will still require access to the CA server before they do authentication to establish VPN tunnels.

  Thus, the VPN tunnel do not settle until that queries of speaking CA and ensure that the certificate of the HUB is always ok, is this correct understanding?

  If this is true, then I wonder what is the workaround not to expose the CA server to the public internet and authentication PKI AAA on the spokes and the hub.

  Thank you!

  .

  There are different ways to solve the mentioned problems:

  Initial enlistment:
  It would be best to do before sending the routers remote site. But of course this is not always possible.
  You can expose your internal certification authority to the internet for registration and don't allow the talk-IP access to the server. You only need tcp/80 for PRACTICE because it is based on HTTP. Another way is to have an additional tunnel in your network who is authenticated with PSK. This tunel must of course use a very strict access control and could even be arrested when is not necessary. This tunnel can also be used for the renewal if your certificate is not valid for some reason (anyone here on the forum who have never made the mistake to note an incorrect expiration date in outlook and lost its VPN the days when autoenrollment was not available?)

  After registration, the rays don't need to reach the CA server more until the certificate must be refreshed. But (and that's what you're referring to): the Department must check the list of revoked CRLs. And the LCR is controlled by the CA. But the LCR should not be stored on the CA. It can also be published for example on a publicly accessible Web server.

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• Server cerificate PKI in the network script: EEM DMVPN

  Hi all

  Before to jump in the topic, I have two questions:

  (1) when the root certificate expire it is possibe to renew automatically?

  (2) when a ray is certificate renew speak it will save the new certificate in NVRAM?

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  What I'm looking for is a solution that might send a log/mail to our customer 2 days (for example) until the certificate expires the certificate authority ROOT/a TALK. It could be a script TCL or EEM.

  All people ideas on how he could do better?

  Thanks in advance.

  Kind regards

  Laurent

  Laurent,

  If you registered via the CEP, as I remember, timers for bearing cert CA indetitiy are kept (you can check in 'See the timer crypto pki').

  We gradin not not automatically the certificate to the running configuration, you must perform a manual "wri" what registration or re-registration is made, it is to be able to recover if things don't go your way.

  I have never created such a script, but depends strongly on your current deployment/configuration scenario.

  Marcin

• Crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed

  Hello

  I have a core (4506e) switch connected to 6 switches (2960) dash...

  Each switch is configured with crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed

  What is it exactly and what is its use?

  Also, when I connect other 2960 with kernel, it automatically takes this encryption config...

  I do not understand this.

  Help me on this

  Hello Vishal,

  the command is a command of security associated with PKI = public key infrastructure.

  The command defines an object which can be approved (trustpoint) with the name TP self-signature, which basically means a security certificate is generated locally

  This should be the default value of the most recent IOS images to prepare devices for secure management via for example SSH and use of certificates

  in other words if you manage your devices with telnet only, these commands have no effect in your scenario.

  See

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS-XML/iOS/security/A1/sec-CR-C5.html#GUID-0447E1FC-0851-4A3F-A727-8CAEEFB84A62

  Edit:

  Here is an example of a series of commands in a router C1811 taken from another thread

  Crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-4147111382

  enrollment selfsigned

  name of the object cn = IOS - Self - signed - certificate - 4147111382

  revocation checking no

  rsakeypair TP-self-signed-4147111382

  !

  
  

  Hope to help

  Giuseppe

• crypto - small issue PKI certificates

  Hey all, just a quick question regarding Cryptography certificate keys. I noticed on our routers DMVPN, appears a large hex key.

  For example:

  TP-self-signed-708137789 crypto pki certificate chain

  certificate self-signed 01

  308201B 6 A0030201 02020101 3082024D 300 D 0609 2A 864886 F70D0101 04050030

  2 060355 04031325 494F532D 53656 C 66 2 AND 536967 6E65642D 43657274 30312E30

  69666963 37303831 33373738 39301E17 313231 31313331 39323230 0D 6174652D

  375A170D 2E302C06 1325494F 03550403 32303031 30313030 30303030 5A 303031

  532D 5365 6C662D53 69676E65 642D 4365 72746966 69636174 652 3730 38313337

  06092A 86 4886F70D 01010105 37383930 819F300D 00308189 02818100 0003818D

  3412 D 002 B6C79947 025566ABF2C7A830...

  quit smoking

  What is the key? Is this related to the star VPN authentication?

  The self-signed certificate can be associated with DMVPN but it can also be associated with other things. For example, if you configure ip http secure server it will cause a self-signed certificate to generate.

  HTH

  Rick

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• What is meant by ICP Net in HFM

  Hi all
  
  What is meant by ICP Net in HFM? How will we get there? Which Member you must call to get the Net PIC?
  
  concerning
  Hubin

  Hello
  As receivables or Payables, may contain amounts due to (or to the) related parties (such as other companies belonging to the same group), as well as any other third-party debtors (or creditors). We usually brake the total amount of these accounts using the dimension of PKI. The 3rd part of the part of the balance of the account go to the Member [no PIC] and apparent sales go to the correct PKI member of the same dimension. Then the balance of the account is summarized in [high PEAK] member, who can be considered to be the amount of the "gross". Then the amount Net of"peak" is the exclusion of all intercompany partner rises - i.e. the amount [no PIC].

  -Kostas

• To what size, we can use if and else in HFM statements rules?

  Hi Experts,
  
  To what size, we can use if and else in HFM statements rules?
  (Scenario, year, time, account, PKI, value, view, entity, Custom1, Custom3, Custom3, Custom4)
  
  concerning
  Dev
  

• PKI Plug account balance

  However, my account card PKI contains a balance to the top-level entity when I run my PIC report it pays 0.

  The corresponding PEAK of report may be correlated not to taken account since both arrived in a very different way. The ICP report performs a mathematical correspondence, including a translation in the currency of the target for each entity. It is based on "" I believe and would not include adjustments or changes of ownership or another codification of the rules introduced in the hierarchy of entities that could alter the balance of card account. If you are taking IsICP account, you should be able to see the amounts in the account on the card to see what entities have contributed to zero balance. Also, make sure that you refuse all journals entered directly on the account of the plug.

  -Chris

• Using [ICP no], [high PEAK] and [PKI entities]

  Dear Experts,
  
  I am a newcomer in HFM application and I have a confusion on the use of PKI Dimension wrote in the title above. As I know, system will use [PKI entities] or [no PIC] based on account of shooting settings. When account settings Plug IsICP =, then the system will store the result of elimination based on each entity (data can be seen in every children [PIC]. When settings of accounts Plug IsICP = N, then the system will store the result of elimination in [no PIC].
  
  For data entry, is there a suggestion or recommended for entry/load data only in [no PIC] or do I put data into a specific entity under [PKI entities]? What is the most and less of it? Also, I tried to find on [PIC] but could not find an answer on how to use it.
  
  Appreciate any help for my questions.
  
  Thank you
  -Anna

  If you checked "ConsolidationRules = Y" in the application settings, then you need to write a rule.