Why Firefox truncates by mistake my HTML code?

I'm trying to add and provide specific access on page anchors. I first added a link to the landing page (see "here's the code I came first:" below). I then added the specific anchor (#Vespoli_Single). When I save the HTML code, the portion of the page of the href attribute (' / classified ") disappeared and only the #Vespoli_Single remained. I assumed that it was the fault of the editor, but...

To try to diagnose the problem, I did the following:

(Breakdowns) resolved (1) the browser cache on my PC and I tried again. The same problem.

(2) used Firefox on a MacAir. The same problem.

(3) used Safari on a MacAir. No problem!

(4) occasion IE on my PC. No problem!

Who makes Firefox look like the problem.

Here is the code I am in everything first (and saved my work):

<p>For sale: <a href="/Classified_Ads">Vespoli Single $2000</a></p>

Then I added the specific anchor name and saved my work:

<p>For sale: <a href="/Classified_Ads#Vespoli_Single">Vespoli Single $2000</a></p>

After registration, the result was:

<p>For sale: <a href="#Vespoli_Single">Vespoli Single $2000</a></p>

Note that the reference of the page disappeared and the specific anchor remained

Someone at - there * any * idea what is happening? It is a new problem because I used specific anchor href statements successfully in the past.

Yes, this should normally suffice.

A recharge and bypass cache also sends a specific header that a cached version should not be used.

If the new code is downloaded correctly and it works in other browsers then the old page can still be hidden somewhere if Firefox still displays the previous copy.

Tags: Firefox

Similar Questions

Why I can't see the html code?

I worked with this site for some time already and now I really want to disable the horizontal scroll bar. I can't do without html code and for some reason that I do not see the code. Can someone help me?

1. open the Muse project, you created or the new site you want.

2. go to the page to which you want this to apply

3. If you want to apply to the whole site, apply to master pages.

4 now to apply the same code:

a. right click on the page > page properties.

b. meta data > HTML for

c. Paste the code as provided above and as directed by the screenshot below:

Once completed, re - publish the Muse project to the same site to apply the same.

I would like to know if this helps.

I click. Firefox is strictly. All html codes disappears and I'm looking at lines and lines of purely text.

I don't know how to explain it better. A screenshot would be perfect, but I can't understand how to add that. I uninstalled Firefox and reinstalled. I uninstalled Firefox and all my favorites and everything related to Firefox, restarted my computer and then reinstalled Firefox. The problem persists.

Can solve you the problem for a short time by reloading the page without going through files cached? You can do this by using the CTRL + SHIFT + r keyboard shortcut.

If it works and you have a Samsung system, you may disable or delete the program Samsung Support Center, which can remove the files from the cache of Firefox at unpredictable intervals.

Why firefox 15 displays the hex of size for the html data that make up the page?

Windows 7, 32-bit
Firefox 15.0.1 update Friday
Java 1.7.0_07 Friday update

Management forced a Java Update and restart on Friday. When Firefox started it auto-updated V15.0.1. He had problems immediately; the previous session tabs disappeared all and any page with Flash no longer worked (everything was OK before the two updates).

In the recommendations, I created a new profile, copy only on bookmarks and files with name of user/authentication of the previous profile. When manually reopen the necessary tabs, pointed out that any Sonicwall firewall and Panasonic Netcam both display only a blank page with one or more hexadecimal numbers on it.

Efforts to repair since included completely remove Firefox, the plugin Flash and current Java to run in safe mode, disabling all extensions/plugins, running in a completely default new profile with nothing carried over, try with and without hardware acceleration, etc. The behavior does not change. It does not matter if I go via http or https for devices that support both.

JavaScript IS enabled, and the script _no_ blocking is in place; JavaScript works on other sites that use it.

IE9 on the same PC works fine, so it's apparently not a system problem

Looking at the page source shows that hexadecimal numbers are the length of the data in the row or the piece of HTML code, including the following javascript code. The Sonicwall sets up a larger number (2ea) on the line of the display source page that corresponds to the size in bytes of the code in the following lines.

The Panasonic apparently sends the length of the data in each row if it provides a hexadecimal number for each line of HTML in the source display.

What would make Firefox interpret the data incoming size as displayed, but only for certain pages or peripheral? I can visit other sites that have javascript and they work; a source of these pages view shows all the lines with just a hexadecimal number.

view source example of Sonicwall (between the = lines); everything you see on the screen is the "2ea" in the upper left corner

=
```
2ea
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
	<meta name="SonicWALL Administrator" content="Copyright 2004 (c) SonicWALL, Inc. All rights reserved.">
	<title>SonicWALL - Authentication</title>
	<meta name="id" content="auth" >
	<script type="text/JavaScript">
	
	</script>
</head>
<frameset rows="*,1">
	<frame src="auth1.html" name="authFrm" noresize scrolling="no">
	<frame src="emptyView4.html" name="authTgtFrm" noresize scrolling="no">
</frameset>
</html>
=====

View source sample from the Panasonic; the blank lines are displayed as such in the view source screen.  All you see in the browser window is the series of hex numbers separated by a space on the same line.

=====
0

3b
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Frameset//EN">

8
<HTML>

7
<HEAD>

28
<META HTTP-EQUIV="expires" CONTENT="0">

2e
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Pragma" CONTENT="no-cache">

35
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Cache-Control" CONTENT="no-cache">

24
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="none">

30
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="noindex,nofollow">

29
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="noarchive">

15
<TITLE>Start</TITLE>

8
</HEAD>

3d
<FRAMESET border=0 frameSpacing=0 rows=30,8,* frameBorder=0>

4c
<FRAME name=bar src="CgiTagMenu?page=Top&Language=0" scrolling=no NORESIZE>

3c
<FRAME name=hrbar src="BarFoot.html" scrolling=no NORESIZE>

27
<FRAME name=body src="Top?Language=0">

c
</FRAMESET>

9
</HTML>
=====
```
Try to start the computer in safe mode Windows with network support (on the startup screen, press F8) as a test to see if it works better.

My video Html code does not work with chrome or firefox. What I am doing wrong?

I am fairly new to this and am trying to embed a video from my computer in my site but when I publish it the html code that I use doesn't seem to work with firefox or chrome. What I am doing wrong?
< object id = "MediaPlayer" width = "692" height = "690" type = "video/x-ms-asf" >
< param name = "FileName" value = "S:\2015 Properties\2015 Active Properties\2494 Arnold Palmer Drive, Blaine MN 55449\Property Photos\Arnold Palmer - Video.mp4.en9r5uu.partial ' >
< param name = "autostart" value = "false" >
< param name = "ShowControls" value = "true" >
< param name = "ShowStatusBar is preserved" value = "false" >
< param name = 'ShowDisplay"value ="false">
"" < embed type = "application/x-mplayer2" src = "S:\2015 Properties\2015 Active Properties\2494 Arnold Palmer Drive, Blaine MN 55449\Property Photos\Arnold Palmer - Video.mp4.en9r5uu.partial '.
width = "692" height = "690" ShowControls = '1' ShowStatusBar is kept = "0" ShowDisplay = "0" autostart = "0" / >
< / object >

Hello

As I see you are trying to add a MP4 video for Muse I advise you to use steps or widgets available in the link below

link with the steps to add MP4

How to integrate a mp4 video in my muse site.

Free widget

Musepen::HTML5 video player Widget

Concerning

Vivek

What I see in the CSS is not what appears in the HTML code - why?

I work with 5 TCS and HR 11 FM12, all patched up. I find that any FM works better than linked (a little less crashes and access to the CSS seems better).
However, in many cases, the CSS HR does not show which displays the HTML code. Why?
For example, my style of GlossaryDefinition (FM_GlossaryDefinition) is indented FM (part of a running head construction) and I don't want in the HTML output. But such CSS only displayed in HR shows no dash while the HTML displays a dash. How can this be? What is going on?
Thank you
Sean

@seanb_us - I filed a bug report now on this behavior; You should probably do too. Your experimental project will be probably ideal for them to use if they need to see what is happening.

PS - the recipe SSL is the choice that you make on the pod single Source Layouts (who came out of your help). The term 'recipe' is filched from the large (Rick Stone) @Captiv8r ;>)

Generated html code does not open in firefox/safari when incorporated into an iframe

Hello
I was mingling with robohelp for a few weeks now. I can generate a html from a Framemaker book end site. It is integrated in an < iframe > integrate into our website. It works fine on chrome. "However I get on firefox/safari is all ' i ' '. View the source, it becomes obvious that this weird bunch of characters appears before the < html >. I looked into the real generated html code and I see this < feff > tag prefix before the < html > in each file. Naturally, I advanced and removed and the page will now load correctly on firefox/safari. However, the balls are all screwed up. I read a post somewhere that says < feff > contains information about the css classes.
I use techniques Comm Suite - 3.5(full_version). The webhelp html code is generated using the framemaker publishing feature using a file of saved settings *.isf.
So, how to fix this? Any suggestions are welcome.
Thank you

The "bunch of odd characters" is known as the BOM (Byte Order Mark). The problem is on the server.

I saw the same thing when you first use RoboHelp 8 and this is what I have been told by the company that hosts my site.

"I would therefore conclude that the solution to this problem (on Linux systems running Apache) is to add the directive AddDefaultCharset utf-8 on the site's .htaccess file or the Apache config. The advantage of the latter is that it affects only the individual sites. The Apache default character set comes from the file of locale on Linux and defaults to iso-8859-1. It is the conflict between the Apache header with iso-8859-1 and utf-8 character page, which obviously causes problems Firefox. »

In a post on the chrissy_tissy forum added

My machine is Windows, but this still worked correction - some notes on post-porn the fix:

1. make the fix itself (httpd.conf: AddDefaultCharset utf-8).

2. restart the box to apply the hotfix.

3. once the box is restarted, clear your FireFox cache to ensure that you do not continue to see the cached file.

Once all this is done, you will see the contents of output as expected.

See www.grainge.org for creating tips and RoboHelp

@petergrainge

Why Firefox 3.6.12 truncates file names of attachments containing empty spaces (Windows)?

Whenever someone sends me an attachment and I save it, Firefox truncates the file name if the file name contains spaces. I'm under 3.6.12 under Windows 2000 SP4 now. But this problem persists for a long time, with the previous versions of Firefox and Windows XP. Unfortunately, I can't control the names of people send me attachments. For example, if someone sends me a file named "file name.doc" (without the quotes, of course), Firefox is the poster (via Micro$ oft Word a) or records as "file.doc". If I get 'door', that's how it is stored.

See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Filenames_with_spaces_are_truncated_upon_download

Why the element type style repeats in my html code

I have a Business Catalyst site that I created using a starter template. I made a few changes to customize the model and updated the site in British Colombia. After some changes of pages and a few minor adjustments to the CSS file, I noticed that when I view the HTML code that it contains a repetitive style element in the head section. All pages work correctly. I copied and pasted the code below:
< html >
< head >
< title > scientist # | # .com extension < /title >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< style type = "text/css" >
< / style >
< / head >
No functionality has been affected. Any ideas on my what is happening? Thanks for the ideas.

Change you code using the editor in the admin, if you have errors of syntax html 5 it will try to sort the xhtml standards. Online publishers are not intended for the code.

Why Firefox always tells me that Adobe plug-ins must be updated, when I've just updated beyond the versions them says Firefox update?

On the status of the plug-in page, Firefox said I have potentially vulnerable Adobe Flash player c. 19.0.0.185 and should be updated. I have already taken this opinion but Adobe confirms that my version is 19.0.0.226. I ran the update at least twice (and of course I restarted Firefox several times and refreshed the page for good measure). Why Firefox think I always c. 19.0.0.185?

Essentially the same story with Adobe Reader plug-in 15.9.20069.28170. Firefox said I have this outdated version and should be updated. I ran the update at least twice (but unlike with Flash Player I don't know how to confirm that the update is installed). The version that Firefox says I have and advice to update, has not changed.

I've updated two plug-ins yesterday. Immediately after the update, when I refreshed the page status of the plugin, these plug-ins have disappeared from lists "vulnerable" or "outdated". It's only the Adobe Flash Player and Reader plug-in updates (which I did yesterday) that Firefox seems to blind. I waited a day to see if Firefox would recognize the edits today, but it still does not work. On this page of presentation of the question, "Assumptions" of Firefox on my current browser list older versions of Adobe Flash Player and Reader that I've already updated since.

Plugins are installed on the system and not in Firefox. So he can tell you were the same when you installed know that it is usually because you have two system installed an older version of Flash Player.

https://helpx.Adobe.com/Flash-Player/KB/uninstall-Flash-Player-Windows.html

Maybe try to uninstall all versions of Flash Player (basic plugin) and install the current https://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html (basic plugin), while Firefox is closed.

Why firefox has become bloated and lazy like IE?

I tried like hell to stick with firefox, but it became useless.

Installation of costs, on a new installation of operating system on a PC with 8 cores@3ghz and 32 GB of ram, and firefox is STILL SLOW!

More than 10 tabs == random crash for a few seconds / minutes
Have more than 5 tabs and close one that it blocks a few seconds to a minute.
Have more than 10 tabs open, select "Close other tabs" after the tabs, FF hangs for 30-90 seconds.

After the closure of the tabs, CPU utilization pulls up to this core... I say for this kernel, because the limit of mozilla firefox for one heart, which wouldn't be so bad, except EVERYTHING ON THE SYSTEM HANGS waiting for THAT ONE CORE to CATCH THE FUCK UP!

Add on top of that firefox looking more and more like the chrome... I mean.. Firefox is essentially like having the version slow, delayed, shit smell of chrome...

PLEASE GO BACK TO WHAT MADE YOU FAMOUS!

A light and fast browser.

NOBODY WANTS OR NEEDS ALL THAT USELESS GARBAGE YOU KEEP SHOVELLING AWAY!

Here's an idea, before avant d' ajouter to add more code buggy nonsense that serves nothing real other than to make you look more like a bastardised version of chrome, why don't you actually fix crap buggy, slow garbage code have already set you up?

STOP TRYING TO BE LIKE THE CHROME! IF I WANTED CHROME FUCKING, I HAD TO INSTALL IT!

If the next version of Firefox is nothing else than to fix the many problems causing slow performance and high CPU usage, I'll be moving to chrome and leave Firefox and Mozilla to continue its business of a slow and painful death walk down.

@the-edmeister thanks for the typical canned answer, I am pleased to see that copy - paste works always.

Canned responses do not work, because the situation is based on a new installation of the operating system and a new installation of firefox.
All the drivers on the system is new and up-to-date.

I ALWAYS run through the basic troubleshooting list. If I had found a solution for poor performance and hogging CPU memory/crappy, I him have not posted here.

@jscher2000
Thanks for the link, but I had already tried it, work with no joy.

As for the rest of the answer, I have a few comments and questions:

Statement: "Mozilla's mission is to drive the web forward, which is to introduce new technologies constantly in Firefox."

Comment: Change the GUI to work and look like Chrome is not new and innovative. It is simply duplicating someone else's ideas.

Statement: "at the same time, developers constantly working to improve the efficiency of memory."

Comment: since when? Over the years, whenever FF has "updated" the memory usage has increased. On rare occasions, it has also introduced memory leaks, or attempted to hide or split to its own use of memory in the secondary threads... plugin-container for a good idea, is an example that has been poorly implemented.

Statement: "because the browser code is open source, others have used it to create products that look more like older versions of Firefox, or gathered for 64-bit systems, etc..". You can check those and decide if they are more productive for you than the official version. »

Question: Where might these alternatives. Simply Googling turns a myriad of other browsers, Chrome for most of the results. Versions of firefox based very little I could find are the pale Moon and waterfox.
Others are based on the FF are for most * nix flavors or specialized for users of niche such as cat and iceweasle for gnu and debian ice respectively, and wyzo based on niche media downloads.

I understand that Firefox is open source, and if I had the time team, Fund and development to devote to creating a browser standard, basic, no frills, using their source, I would have already.

My problem is not with Firefox itself, but the struggle continues Mozilla comply Firefox for chrome UI, while gradually adding bloat, instability and some "features" unnecessary which are not needed or requested by users.

I get that Mozilla tries to innovate. But adding bloat and tracking features of data or features that cannot be used unless the tracking data is enabled is a huge slap in the face of almost all those who have started using firefox because it objected to these measures implemented in other browsers at the time.

The entire reason why firefox became so popular was because it worked, was quick and did not use all of the system cpu and ram. Why? because at that time, it had all the bells, whistles, gadgets, door knockers, the banana seat, ape-hanger handlebars and a chrome-plated stand... Remove all trash, and the browser would be more likely to cut its use of CPU and memory in two, if not more.

And Yes... This has turned into a feedback session.
No, I didn't intend to let him be.
No, I will not create a survey of 'feedback '... I've done done several times over the years, and as is typical of mozilla, they simply ignore it and do the opposite.

Modify the html code in the page you are viewing automatically

How to change automatically certain code of html on certain web pages in firefox

As on the Web pages, I can right click inspect element and it will allow me to remove things off the page.

I want that to happen automatically for certain Web pages when it contains some html code

I tend to write scripts customized for this sort of thing, but for a couple of goal solvents more general, you might investigate:
- 'Delete permanently' can be trained to remove items from a page whenever you visit. In my opinion, it works by right-clicking on that you want to delete. https://addons.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/addon/remove-it-permanently/
- Element Hiding Helper, who is a companion for Adblock Plus add-on recommended a review on this page. If you already use Adblock Plus, it's probably a more effective combination. https://addons.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/addon/elemhidehelper/

How we prevent Windows Media Player plug-ins from the substitution of sizing in html code integration?

My html code for integration of Windows Media Player in Firefox but not IE 8 problems recently developed framework. The player displays correctly at the beginning, but then repositions and resizes. It seems that my width setting is to honor, but not my height adjustment. Also, autoplay = "false" (or "0") is also not honored the video starts playing after the repositioning and resizing. I tried different code for integration with the same result. I have the correct Windows Media Player Firefox plugin and it is up-to-date. I tried the update to Firefox version 9.0.1, but the problem persists. I came across web postings applying substituting the parameters of plugin embed code. No workaround solution appreciated. Thank you.

A good place to ask for advice on web development is to the 'Web Standards Development/evangelism' MozillaZine forum.
- http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=25
Aid to this forum are better informed on issues related to web development.

You must register on MozillaZine forum site to post in this forum.

Why firefox 3.0.19 crashes with segfault for regular users while sudo user it dose not?

Why firefox 3.0.19 segmentation fault during a regular users use, when a sudo user it dose not have it?

ID of the Crash

13233

User Agent

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB6.4; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;. InfoPath.2 CLR 3.0.04506.648 .NET; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

Do you use Linux?
If so, then what distribution?
You posted with an IE 8 user agent.

If you're on Linux, using a version of Firefox for your Linux distribution or the normal version of Firefox from the Mozilla site?

Have you checked that your configuration meets the requirements of Firefox?
http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/system-requirements-v3.html - Firefox 3 system requirements

See also http://kb.mozillazine.org/Installing_Firefox

Library publishes not updated HTML Code

Hi guys
I have a library file that controls my side_nav_bar for my entire site.
The LBI file is located in the root directory of my site - the same place where all my html files.
When I make a change to my library folder, it asks me if I want to update the files that are related to it.
I say Yes and let it do its thing, but then I noticed that the HTML code has not been updated for the linked html pages.
I have to manually remove the original code of the library of HTML pages and then drag and drop the file my file library assets force it to bind.
Obviously to do this completely unassign the purpose of having the library files.
Did I miss a step? can someone please help.
See you soon

Yalpi,

I was able to determine the problem.

There was a
tag in the document itself but also good as a
tag in the library. In other words, two
tags... one in the body of the document just above the library and the other in the library itself. When I removed the div tag duplicate in the content of the body, all of my pages updated correctly when I ran library update.

It was obviously a mistake on my part, but I don't think that this type of error should prevent the updated library. Page worked fine with the duplicate div tags but library would not be updated because of this.

Thank you..

Why Firefox truncates by mistake my HTML code?

Similar Questions

=

ID of the Crash

User Agent

Maybe you are looking for