Why is there the questionmarks on files?

Similar Questions

• Why is there the photos that I am importing out grayscale.

  Why is there the photos that I am importing out grayscale.

  I'm the dragging in a tabloid paper that I normally use and my photos are without any color, even after I place.

  Look at the documents tab and see how you are. If she says grayscale, then all of the imported pictures will also be grayscale.

• Why is there the databases for two Web sites in my appdata roaming default firefox profile folder?

  Www.fling.com _ C:\Users\user\appdata\Roaming\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles\i4unw84s.default\databases\http_

                                                                                                                                                                        C:\Users\user\appdata\Roaming\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles\i4unw84s.default\databases\https_cashier.bovada.lv_
  

  Two of these databases of site are 64 KB and io_temp.sqlite files. I want to know how they were created and what information is that are stored there. I know that my boyfriend goes to the website of bovada much, but want to know if he has information of personal connection stored for two of these sites. I know that they are not cookies because I saw the list of cookies and delete the and these files are still there. I really want to know if the only way that the sites Web could be in the folder because he saved intentionally information stored on these sites and if not, then why they are part of a roaming profile?

  Hello, I could not find any documentation on what the data in the profile or an io_temp.sqlitefolder - file would do in firefox (perhaps it was a first version of dom storage or indexeddb).
  If you have questions about the use of these sites by your boyfriend, you should probably talk with him directly about this, instead of finding an answer in this way...

• Configuration of backups from iCloud drive: why are there two Mobile Documents files?

  I've recently started using iCloud drive to synchronize documents between my Mac and iOS devices. Now, I want to assure you that I have local backups of these documents.

  I understand that the documents synchronized via iCloud are store locally in my Mobile user home/library/Documents folder. But when I check I made 2 folders: Documents Mobile and Mobile Documents.90391253.  The Documents Mobile folder seems to keep all the records that I created using Pages, drafts and TextEdit.  The second folder has files with obscure names such as ' JFJWWP64QD ~ com ~ goodiware ~ GoodReader. ". Records of Documents that I checked are empty.

  Here is a screenshot of the second folder:

  

  Why are there two folders of Documents Mobile? When you add a folder to a backup program, I would add two folders or just the folder Documents Mobile?

  The second folder (the one your screenshot) is a backup of an iPhone, iPad, or iPod Touch, which was made via iTunes. More information: finding and managing your backups iTunes - Apple Support

• There the opening Style "File names" & "Names of Version" in LR?

  I (finally) move to Aperture and LR plans. My opening workflow was to import the original image file (a file camera RAW or TIFF file scanned) under its original name, make changes (which creates one or more 'versions'). I then rename the version based on a date-sequence numbering system, so that the original (unaltered) maintains its "original name.

  This method is possible in LR? Is there a file system and similar versions? It seems pretty basic info, but couldn't find anything in the forum search.

  Thanks, Dave

  If the version that you want to rename a file as a second saved from the original TIFF file, you can change its name by editing the file name field in the metadata Panel. If you want to rename by using a file name template, you can choose library > rename Photo (or press F2).

  If the version that you want to rename is a virtual copy, you must use the feature to copy name to name this virtual copy (a virtual copy being its own name any file). You will see the name field of the copy in the file name field when the metadata Panel is set to "Default" or "EXIF and IPTC.

  

  If you want to export a virtual copy as a new file version and have this new file using the name of the copy, include the name of the copy token in the filename template that you use for the exported file.

  Here is an example that I used recently:

  Original raw file. File name: 0001.RAW

  Virtual version of this raw file, cropped to 1:1 copy. Copy the name: Instagram

  Virtual copy exported JPEG file is automatically named: 0001 - Instagram.JPG

  (because I exported using a template configured with chips 'File Name' file name and then '-' then 'copy name')

• Why are there too many vmdk files?

  I use vmware workstation 8 to end of software testing. Both the guest and the host Windows 7 64 bit.

  I have 12 shots with the guest. I found that there are 283 files vmdk, which takes about 420 GB of disk space.

  Now, I deleted all of the snapshots, but there are still 259 files vmdk, who take 395 GB of disk space.

  As I deleted all of the snapshots, now the guest is just a pure installs Windows 7. It should take no more than 10 GB.
  Any suggestion?

  Thank you.

  Wow! The directory listing shows 281 snapshots that dose of course not jive with the dictionary of snapshot (file .vmsd) If you have a mess on your hands.

  Not completely sure that you are the ultimate goal here is however I suggest creating a new virtual hard disk using vmware-vdiskmanager pointing towards "w7 64 - 000281.vmdk" as source and then swap out.

  Also the list of directories being incomplete, it displays only the hard files, I can't you what else to clean the other then delete the file .vmsd if you choose to consolidate snapshots of the "w7 64.vmdk" file using vmware-vdiskmanager.

  Note: DON'T do anything without having a full and correct virtual machine backup before you continue!

• Why is there the icons collection (with blue arrows) on my files and folders network?

  I've never seen before, it has just appeared this morning.

  That is right.

  You can check your offline files by going to start-> Controlpanel-> offline files

  Here you can also turn it off if you have not (especially useful on laptops)

  Kind regards
  Joel

• Why not place the Oracle data files on local disks

  Hi, I want to ask a fundamental question.
  
  Almost any Oracle installation I've seen, data files have been placed on Mount points, disk etc..
  
  Is there a reason for this? Why no one does place for local disks oracle data files? I couldn't find the answer on the installation guide
  
  I ask this because I will install oracle (10g) on vmware and trying to decide whether to put data on the vmdk (virtual computer local disk) files...
  Is - this recommended? If not, why it is recommended to put data files to a disc of fixation for point/external etc..
  
  
  Thanks in advance

  Hello

  People store data files on separate disks
  (1) bettter performance
  (2) the data can be in a centralized storage
  (3) if the OS crashes always files are safe
  (4) configurable with raid options
  (5) hot Swapping
  (6) easily can add additional storage

  Kind regards
  Delphine K

• Why is there the lag when you press the SPACEBAR for playback in edit mode?

  When I press the SPACEBAR to start playback of a file in edit mode, a second of 2-3 delay before playback starts ago, this makes editing very difficult competently. does anyone know of any settings that may resolve this problem or may have another reason for why this might be happening?

  It may happen if the sampling frequency of your hearing file does not match that of your audio interface as hearing should make a conversion of the prior sampling rate it loads the audio buffer.

• Why is there the constant disk activity since I upgraded to 30.0?

  Since Firefox has been upgraded to v 30.0 (and it has been updated automatically, I don't like) there is the constant disk activity. Is there a way to revert to a previous version until this problem is solved?

  I created a new profile and all the disk activity is gone. Thanks cor - el.

• Why is there the lag when the controls of the transformation of an image are changed

  I have not noticed this until the course of the latest updates.   When I manipulate the anchor point, position or scale an image using the sliders to entry in Control Panel under Motion effects image redrawn in the timeline is behind the entrance to the value of the slider with the mouse.   So when I click and drag the x value of the position property of the image does not seem to move at the same speed that the value is changed by the mouse.    It feels like the image try constantly catching up to the value being edited.    It makes it quite difficult to use visually control transform simple handling.

  My best guess is that the most recent update uses the GPU to redraw the images in a way that causes redraw poor and problems behind.   Unfortunately I found the user interface of many Adobe products becoming more and more difficult to use because of problems of refreshment and buggy redrawing issues.

  Can I solve this problem of lag when you change the values for transform a sequence or an image in the Panel effects/movement in some way?

  As I discovered under file > Project Settings > General in the rendering engine: only the Mercury playback engine software and was gray.    I had to update the Nvidia Quadro 5000 drivers version 340.84 to market the MPE GPU accelerated rendering engine.  This solved the problem of lag in refreshment for the images I use on the timeline.

  * I found it strange the GPU of MPE VAC. become disabled without warning until an update of my pilots was completed.

• Why are there "The Hobbit" looking so weak?

  For many fans of Tolkien the first tranche of the Hobbit trillogy was one of movies dissapointing most of his life.

  Simply, it does not anywhere close to film height of the Lord of the RINGS.

  The quality by a large number was tacky beyond belief. The CG looked less convincing than the rings.

  The story was boring.

  There was very little atmosphere.

  I could go on and...

  But, since it is a Visual Effects forum, I would like to know the reason that there is such little depth to the scenes of the atmosphere and asethetics.

  Is it because it was shot digitally?

  My wife and I watched the Hobbit twice in the same day. First on a normal screen with normal projection then in the ultimate theater with HFR and 3D. The first viewing was acceptable for me but great film not because there was so much CGI that the 'magic' went on a lot of shots. Just too many things in the framework in a large number of sequences. Say what you like on CGI, but when you throw in the miniatures and mix the practical effects with CGI screen experience is much better. Take an example of The Dark Knight.

  When we walked in the 3d version of extreme high refresh rate my wife stayed for about 10 minutes. She leaned over to me and said: I can't watch this. I feel like I'm watching TV on the biggest screen in the world. It's driving me crazy and gives me a headache. BTW, our seats were theoretically almost perfect.

  There are some color classification differences with the show being much cooler HFR. I saw of Douglas Troubull Showscan experiences with 60 fps and j70mm projection and they have been wonderful to look at, so I can't blame all on HFR. Only, he has not worked for me. Too many times the 3D and the intensification by CGI scenes were just too. Large images + great direction can overcome a poor script. 50 cooks trying to throw everything in their pantry in a single pot in fact weak and tasteless stew. I think it was the problem here. Too creative in pushing their own technology and being close to the project that they thought they were doing something wonderful. All that remains in this case long enough actually their own Howard the duck. At least the Hobbit didn't sink that low.

• Why is there the unordered lists displaying bullet as ordered, numbered lists?

  I'm a developer web front end and whenever I have an unordered list < ul > on a Web site, the new version of Firefox is switching balls (which is the standard for non ordered lists) numbers (which is the norm for ordered lists, or < ol >). Is it possible that this can be corrected? Those are the Web standards and all the sites that we use < ul > then it will be very difficult for us to go back through and give each site a list-style-type.

  You can post a link to a page accessible to the public (i.e. no authentication or signature required)?

  You can right click on the list item and inspect element allows to open the Inspector and check what are the rules are applied to the UL and LI elements.

  • https://developer.Mozilla.org/Tools/Page_Inspector

• Why is there the occasional corrupted video images/photos on my MKII and MKIII?

  

  

  The above plans are an image from the video and the photo taken on my Canon MarkIII, respectively, during a session at the other week in Omaha, DON'T. Every once in a while in some clips, maybe every minute or so, a corrupt pixelated image will appear as seen above. Thus, in the course of a couple of my timelapses a number of corrupt executives would be manifested, as seen in the image at the bottom.

  Everyone knows something like that? I found this prognosis in another thread:

  «It can also be an early symptom that begins the reading circuit / write failure - sometimes a capacitor or a transistor works fine but when warm (lots of photos with time or the camera over a long period) begins to flee and sends abnormal signals.» If this is the case it usually worsens over time. It may also just be external interference: an electronic or magnetic strong radio signal interfering with the electronics of the camera. "I saw someone whose shoot together turns like that because he would be put in place very close to a large power transformer.

  Thanks in advance for the help,

  -Gabe

  I am inclined to think that you won't encounter read/write failure simultaneously on the MkII circuit some and the MkIII regardless. Cameras tend to follow their own adgenda and rarely conspire against the photographer so mischeeviously.

  Apart from this finding, I would seek a similar State. You buy and use the same memory cards in both cameras. You live in a hostile environment or you work in a hostile environment. (Hey, it's a good question! Ha Ha.) You're like me and tend to drop your posessions darlings. Your memory cards are not designed for data that you save, and you're the buffer overflow.

  Good luck.

• Why is there the oscillations during sampling a signal by steps?