Why my filezilla only concert to a server?

Similar Questions

• Why can not only print from widows 7 to my hp6100

  Why can not only print from widows 7 to my hp6100

  Hello

  Probably, you need drivers, please download the following package and install on your Windows 7 computer:

  http://ftp.HP.com/pub/softlib/software12/COL42284/bi-108861-3/OJ6100_1321.exe

  Kind regards.

• Is it possible to use Dreamweaver with WordPress (has the classes by Joseph Lowery) only uses a test server AWS and not an environment local localhost?

  Is it possible to use Dreamweaver with WordPress (has the classes by Joseph Lowery) only uses a test server AWS and not an environment local localhost?

  Yes, I want to talk and EC2 instance and I am able to do Dreamweaver to easily connect using SFTP which I believe is a SSH protocol. See the image below. This method works.

  I currently have a test instance and will finally have an instance of production when the site is finished.

  Local environment is not installed on my workstation and my thought was that put it on the server would allow transparent operation including scripts on the server side. The testing station is not public.

  

• I payd with my credit card for the CC costumes... why can I only download trial versions?

  I payd with my credit card for the CC costumes... why can I only download trial versions?

  Hi APS investment.

  I checked your account and I see that you have subscribed for the creative cloud for teams in which you have a license that you have assigned to the same Adobe ID, but the invitation is still not accepted.

  In order to activate the license, please accept the invitation of your receipt for the same email, then sign on the CC from Adobe and reconnect.

  Sign in, sign out | Creative office cloud app

  Kind regards

  Sheena

• Why can't I get an Adobe server to download LR6CC and ACR9?

  Why can't I get an Adobe server to download LR6CC and ACR9?

  Hi Donald,.

  Kindly share the details mentioned below so that we can help you properly.

  Version of the OS.

  Any messages or popup you get:

  Meanwhile, be sure to follow the below mentioned steps.

  Download lightroom 6: digital photography of software | Free download Adobe Photoshop Lightroom CC trial

  Update CAB 9:

  1 rename 1.0 ~1.0

  • Mac: ~/Library/Application Support/Adobe/AAMUpdater/1.0/
  • Win: C:\Users\[Username]\AppData\Local\Adobe\AAMUpdater

  Perform the update.

  2. try to download and install the update manually.

  • 2014 all updates of Adobe CC: directly download for Mac OS links | ProDesignTools
  • 2014 all updates of Adobe CC: Direct for Windows download links | ProDesignTools

  If you are not able to install the patch, please try

  • Activation and use of the user 'root' on OS X - Apple support
  • Admin hidden (Windows): enable and disable the built-in Administrator (Standard 7 SP1) account
  • Perform the update.

  You can also try: update troubleshooting problems | CS5, CS5.5, CS6

  Thank you

  Atul Saini

• On my menu CC drop down why is that only Lightroom app that doesn't have a CC

  I historically used Lightroom as a single product purchased and recently I bought the creative cloud.

  As a new user, I am very familiar with things, but I've noticed on my cloud creative drop-down list containing a list of all my applications, I noticed that each of my apps conclude with CC in the end.

  with other words

  Photoshop CC

  Bridge CC

  Edge inspect CC

  Scout CC

  Lightroom NOTHING?

  On my drop CC why is that only Lightroom app that doesn't have a CC at the end of Lightroom.

  
  

  The system has recognized my old Lightroom and there no installed a CC version or is it the same for everybody out there and if so why?

  
  

  Why no CC on the drop-down list after the word Lightroom?
  

  Why no CC on the drop-down list after the word Lightroom?

  Nothing to worry about. It's the same for everybody and it's normal.

  Lightroom does not follow the version numbering (again) Cloud. She always had her own version numbering.

  When the cloud came out, there was no included Lightroom.

  Added Adobe Lightroom to the cloud later but never added CC to the numbering. So yet another layer of confusion has been added to the management software Cloud versions.

  There are now two separate versions of Lightroom:

  • 5.6 Lightroom (perpetual license, does not include Lightroom Mobile)
  • 5.6 Lightroom (a cloud which includes Lightroom Mobile)

• Created by external computer files are read only on the file server.

  Is not a question of indesign, but have searched and searched but cannot find an answer, hoping that someone here had the same problem and find out if it can be fixed.

  Systems:

  MacPro running snow lepoard as the file server

  iMac, read and write files in the Macpro have access to shared files.

  Problem:

  When the iMac saves any type of file, or create directories everything the iMac on the Macpro system is read only the user to Macpro.

  Only solution so far has been to give the iMac user an admin on the MacPro account, then everything they create is not read-only.

  It works but it's not the best of ideas for them to access the system files and you have.

  Is there a way to make the iMac to create files that are not read only without obtaining the server version of Mac OS x or giving them administrative rights to the Macpro.

  For any idea or suggestion would be great

  Thank you

  Problem solved!

  All this is down to the property not sharing or perrmissions.

  For anyone who would need to know:

  in the dialog box get info select "property to ignore on this volume."

  tonyharmer:

  You right where people above in the apple forums where it is very useful

• [WLS 10.3] Why I didn't "Use SSL JSSE" (Server-> configuration-> SSL)

  WebLogic Server version: 10.3
  
  Why I didn't "Use SSL JSSE" (Server-> configuration-> SSL)

  Because you're using WL 10.3?

  The feature is available in 10.3.3 (version 11g)

• When you set the outgoing SMTP server, why not specifying the SMTP server 'by' is not working, but only the first specified server?

  I have several options for the outgoing SMTP server. I put a default and attempt to send. It fails and uses the first condition in the list.

  I restart Thunderbird and try to send. It uses the first condition in the list.

  I eliminated all SMTP servers in the list but the one I want, and it works.

  What escapes me, that I have observed this problem on all my systems for a long time?

  Kind regards

  Carl

  your lack of anything that account having a SMTP server associated with them, which, if your 'in' an account more wrinkles 'default '.

  Right click on a folder in account, and then select settings.
  Click on the account name in the settings and on the right is a drop down list and the value 'default' smtp for this account.

• Copy the new Gmail message to a local folder in Thunderbird-, and mark it as read ONLY on the Gmail server

  Hi forum,

  for a long time, I tried to set up a filter which copies new messages in the Gmail inbox to a folder in local mail in Thunderbird, and defines in addition/unread state correctly on both ends.

  However, no matter what I try, it doesn't work.

  There seems to be no way to set the playback on the IMAP server to 'read' State after the copy action and at the same time keep the "unread" status for mails that have been copied to the local folder in Thunderbird.

  It does not work even if I created an intermediate folder on the IMAP server where mail is first moved to and only then is copied to the local Thunderbird folder later.

  I also tried all sorts of combinations with the 'move later' and other actions to FiltaQuilla.

  I'm really at a loss. I'm the only one who wants to copy the message from Gmail to a local Thunderbird folder and get the status of unread / read appropriate on the server, as well as in Thunderbird?

  Bunch help, thank you

  Bravo David.P

  Why is that every time I ask about any TB support forum, I find myself explaining things instead of getting an answer?

  I need to mail to stay on the server, even if I delete it locally. What part of this is not understandable?

  In any case, don't bother. I fixed it myself at the same time by putting in place the new Gmail account in Thunderbird.

  See also:
  http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=31 & t = 2877149

• Why Firefox denies my request for websocket server upgrade? (It works using Chrome)

  I have a simple web page that I use to test my server websocket manipulation.

  < meta charset = "utf-8" / >
  < title > WebSocket Test < /title >
  < script language = "javascript" type = "text/javascript" >

   var wsUri = "ws://192.168.1.18/";
   var output;
  

   function init()
   {
     output = document.getElementById("output");
     testWebSocket();
   }
  

   function testWebSocket()
   {
     websocket = new WebSocket(wsUri);
     websocket.onopen = function(evt) { onOpen(evt) };
     websocket.onclose = function(evt) { onClose(evt) };
     websocket.onmessage = function(evt) { onMessage(evt) };
     websocket.onerror = function(evt) { onError(evt) };
   }
  

   function onOpen(evt)
   {
     writeToScreen("CONNECTED");
     doSend("WebSocket rocks");
   }
  

   function onClose(evt)
   {
     writeToScreen("DISCONNECTED");
   }
  

   function onMessage(evt)
   {
     writeToScreen('RESPONSE: ' + evt.data+'');
     websocket.close();
   }
  

   function onError(evt)
   {
     writeToScreen('ERROR: ' + evt.data);
   }
  

   function doSend(message)
   {
     writeToScreen("SENT: " + message);
     websocket.send(message);
   }
  

   function writeToScreen(message)
   {
     var pre = document.createElement("p");
     pre.style.wordWrap = "break-word";
     pre.innerHTML = message;
     output.appendChild(pre);
   }
   window.addEventListener("load", init, false);
  

  < /script >

  WebSocket test

  I use a TI CC3200 to run the Web server code.

  It turns out TI implementation expects to find the upgrade header followed by the key in the query. This is the reason why he was working for the chrome.

  FireFox has the key before the upgrade header. TI code was not the key and just using a string NULL for her. So the answer accept had something to reasonable search, but didn't.

  It would have been nice if firefox didn't would be out something on the data of accept being wrong.

  In any case, TI is aware of the issue.

• Why remove the only element used, the bar addons?

  Why their v29 change log done said 'additional options', when the only thing that most of us see is deleted the options, including the most widely used single section: bar of the addon? I don't want to install an addon to display the bar of the addon, which is present from pre-Firefox Mozilla days. So why delete the single most used item? Done the previous CEO Pro-life as it too and the new direction isn't that? Looks like Firefox is going backward, not forward.

  NO.... I'm not citing specific examples, but put MORE junk at the top after we are inundated with having TO use the tabs (which are redundant copies of windows below only cramped in to the top at the same time bar) bar, now I have 22 size icons and even drop my space window of text buttons lower in my workspace. It is not that the buttons/icons/addons don't work. (I swear to you that I don't know how people who work in support might need these detailed explanations) It is the fact that, to keep the premium screen, space open, to crush the tabs windows and Firefox destroyed this option. So we went with opening and closing of the bar of the addon whenever we need an add-on. Not to mention the addons as a certain addon Instagram that shows when new photos have arrived, or my safety bar that shows how much the ads and the sites have been blocked, as well as a mouse on display them separately in a concealed popout. Firefox developers are so stuck on their own crud they REALLY think that everyone has and uses on a Galaxy phone apps and crunches all icons like a 13 year old? Those of us who are older, more mature and use addons for something else than sharing photos... (as my Google Voice addon that does not work now to accept calls to open a bar and clicking on the icon until it accepts the click, oops dropped call or went to voicemail because you did not 3-ring)... Phone, Flash development, download videos from websites, eBay, Amazon shopping sales, torrents and each model of business platform has their own INHOUSE addon. You DESTROYED, DECIMATED, no. the model of less clicks is longer, for A SUPPOSEDLY SLIM BROWSER SIMPLIFIED! It's no wonder Execs of Firefox are clueless. Block us who care, our usage patterns and thus only the details on the use of the games for children under 15 to noticed by telemetry from FF.

  The basic concept, delete something, at least that replace you it with something equality in employment and work.

  Make users create a toolbar addon to replace the bar of the addon is stupid! Pointblank and simple.

  Add more clicks to get to the new bar addon was stupid and dumber still was the destruction of a top level bar with a value of the space in the window by the new addon bar be an addon or a creation of the user between the Bookmark Bar and address bar. STUPID!

  Finally, why is Firefox simplify anything. It is at the discretion of the user during the construction of its browser him or her self. That's what means be a modular browser. It is not Mr. potato head with only 4 types of eyes, nose and mouth. It's supposed to be a free canvas to work and create our idea of art works.

• How to synchronize only in the direction "Server computer" for one-off restoration?

  A malware scan erased some of my addons. I want to restore it, but think that if I simply synchronize then the server will interpret it as if this new configuration is what I want (and so change the server). So, how can I make sure that sync is only from the server from my computer (hand)-?
  Seems like a pretty fundamental question for me but I can not simply to find advice on this in the archives, etc.

  In case anyone is wondering, I ran the vacuum cleaner "Junkware Removal Tool" (or possibly "Malwarebytes Anti-Malware") and the addons that were removed were: anonymoX, Flash Video Downloader, thumbnail Zoom more among many others.

  Thank you.

  Thank you both for your kind replies. Philipp, if I understand it right, that would work there had not been this case that I had added bookmarks and other things I want to keep.
  .
  In any case, I decided that I will reinstall the addons are deleted manually (which unfortunately very probably means that I'm missing out on a few). The thing is, I fell on this issue before and at this time there resolved manually, so I expected at this time was a more general solution.
  .
  Nevertheless, thank you for your kind suggestions!

• So, for the 3rd TIME WHEN I REQUEST SUPPLICANT why NOT update only FF updated my browser?

  You see, I ask myself this same question twice before, because Firefox has once more for the third time last updated browser DESPITE MY PLAIDANT ASK TWICE BEFORE NOT to DO SO. but now I have a platform to make public DISHONESY of Firefox, put to task for defying a very adamant demand, specifically NOT UPDATE MY BROWSER, CIRCUMSTANCES THAT systematically, repeatedly occurred throughout all these years I've been with Firefox since 2005.

  How is it that Firefox continues to deliberately defy, ignore the wishes of its customers most loyal me inflamed beyond words, when I repeatedly made KNOWN QUITE WELL NOT to HAVE MY BROWSER updated.

  BUT NOW, AFTER ALL THIS TIME, TOGETHER WITH THE INSIGHT I HAVE RUN AS ONE INDUSTRY COMPUTER SPECIALIST I know very well why Firefox CONTINUES THIS PRACTICE WITH ABANDON.

  1. they do not like anyone was sleeping with the subject: config (then why did you never included it in the first place) as I do.

  2. they don't like anyone made modules incompatible extensions again as I do.

  3. they do not like someone tampering Firefox as I do.

  And all Firefox should do to reduce to nothing all the meticulous work I spend change about: config. configurations to accommodate my own and the needs of my company and all the hard work. spend time of activation of newly incompatible extensions, I need to work as effectively as possibleamong other things that I tweaked, THAT I EXACTLY WHAT YOU DO for THE REASONS I GAVE. YOU deliberately, to DO so hatefully. And that's the final reason for YOUR contempt total without taking account of the request of a customer. In addition, YOU, fIREFOX feel that since you wrote the code, and the owner of the code, YOU can insist USERS to follow the protocols of Firefox exactly as I ask.

  Another example of YOUR dictatorial to browse the web - what approach YOU feel that no one should dare to take a peek to content that is not the level of WHAT YOU BELIEVE IS purity AND ALL OTHER CONTENT CORROMPRE THE MORALS OF OUR YOUTH.

  In one of the cases where my browser has been updated despite my unyielding position against it, someone in YOUR ORGANIZATION has removed several sites for adults STRICTLY STRAIGHT to my favorites.

  SO now, NOT ONLY DO you HAVE AN ATTITUDE INTRUSIVE big BROTHER THAT NOBODY DARE DEVIATE FROM the OFFICIAL FIREFOX BROWSING PROTOCOLS BUT NOW YOU have put in PLACE A CENSURER CAMPAIGN ON WHAT YOU CAN READ, WATCH at all SIMPLY BOOKMARK or.

  BUT IT IS EVEN WORSE, MUCH WORSE. THE LAST TIME TWO YOU UPDATED MY BROWSER AGAINST MY WILL, YOU GAVE ME THE REASON MORE LAME MORE STUPID, INSULTING, STUPID WHY YOU UPDATED TWICE BEFORE AS IF THEY WERE JUST CIRCUMSTANCES THAT OTHERWISE NEVER WOULD HAVE VIOLATED AS WELL AS THE PRIVACY BEING THE TERRIBLE REBEL COMMERCIAL PRACTICES, ARROGANT AND SIMPLY TO YOUR MITIGATING CUSTOMER. BUT NOW IN ADDITION TO PROVE YOURSELF TO BE A MEGALOMANIACAL SOCIOPATH YOU HAVE REVEALED YOURSELF TO BE ABSOLUTE LIARS CHRONICLES.

  AND IT OF BECAUSE I AM RESPONSIBLE FOR MY COMPUTER SERVICE COMPANY AND HAVE A LOT OF COMPUTERS UNDER MY CONTROL AND SUPERVISION. I HAVE ONLY RECENTLY PASSED ON SOME OF OUR COMPUTERS FROM IE TO FIREFOX AS A TEST AND I AM DEPRIVED OF WHAT HAPPENED BETWEEN THE COMPUTERS THAT WERE USING FIREFOX AS A TEST STUDY.

  AND WHILE THE TRUTH BEING WHAT IT IS, YOU ARE CAREFUL NOT TO MESS WITH MY BROWSER, AS IT IS WELL CONFIGURED TO NOT UPDATE, WHICH, IN YOUR HONOR, YOU GAVE HIM A LARGE DOCK, BUT YOU GRIMLY UPDATED SIX COMPUTERS THAT WERE PART OF OUR TEST STUDY
  WHO HAD THE SAME CONFIGURATION OF BROWSER REQUEST NOT TO BE UPDATED BUT THAT YOU UPDATED HOWEVER. THESE COMPUTERS WERE PART OF A STUDY OF PRODUCTIVITY WHICH, BY UPDATING IT SET ALL THE SMALL EXPERIENCE OF OUR BACK A LITTLE BIT.

  SO, WHAT AM I GOING TO DO WITH YOU? I HAVE TO REALLY THINK LONG AND SERIOUSLY ON HOW TO RESPOND TO AN ORGANIZATION THAT HAS SHOWN NOTHING BUT THE WORST KIND OF APATHY, PRACTICES DISHONEST COMMERCIAL I'VE SEEN SINCE BEING IN THE COMPUTER SECTOR.

  Automatic updates can sometimes damage the files in the profile, and I always read several web for a complaint indicating that it has not changed. This is one of the reasons why I don't like the automatic updates.

• Satellite Pro A200 - 1 MI: Why Vista see only 3070MB Ram

  Hi guys, another problem of RAM...

  I have improved my A200 - 1 MI to 2xGB RAM kingston 667 Hz (2 x 1024 667 Mhz) settings BIOS and Toshiba are OK, they accept 4096 MB of RAM, but Vista (32, business) does claim that 3070 MB! What's wrong? Why does not my vista accept, left, about 1 GB of RAM?

  In addition :) Vista poster performance index the same result after upgrade... help please

  Maybe this doc from Toshiba will help you;

  + Why my laptop recognizes only about 3 GB instead off the coast of all 4 GB of memory, I installed? +
  http://support.toshiba-tro.de/KB0/TSB7601WE0007R01.htm

  Always is that the Windows OS may not recognize all of the 4 GB of memory due to the limitation of the 32 bit OS.

  Just FYI;
  Some people have suggested that after the installation of the 4 GB Vista SP1 are listed in system properties.
  Currently, only the beta version of SP1 was released. The final version should be relsed in the next two weeks.