Why the TB think the 0Auth2 problem is fixed at 38.1.0

Similar Questions

• Why the spellchecker of Firefox fixes in Spanish instead of English?

  Firefox fixes in Spanish if current browser and Op system is set to English. I tried English installation as an add-on dictionary and it gives me a message "cannot install update in this version of Firefox 3.6.3. It was a recent download of firefox.

  This has happened

  Each time Firefox opened

  == I have installed firefox in the new system with Win 7, April 2010

  You certainly seem to have two dictionaries (GB, British-English and Spanish, es - are) installed correctly, no problem.

  You don't mention what version of Firefox you have installed essentially, the English or the Spanish version, but I'll assume English here - it may even indifferent, as long as both dictionaries are installed properly, they must be usable.

  When you enter text in a text box, you should be able to click right in the region and in the context menu, have a point "language > ' under which you can select which dictionary to use in the page.

  To make it even more practical and user-friendly to yourself, I can strongly recommend an add-on Firefox that I use myself to control the selection of the dictionary; the Dictionary Switcher addon. You can get it here: Mozilla Addons or authors homepage.

  I hope it's useful for you - if not, please let us know so that we can investigate on where this fails and include no matter how much detail you can come up with what could help us track down the problem.

• Why the version of Windows 7 to Windows DVD Maker product a blurry video of Windows Live Movie Maker?

  When I do a DVD (using Windows DVD Maker) of a film produced by Windows Live Movie Maker photos are blurred and contained very low quality video.  The photos that I use in the project are very sharp, as is the video that I use in the project.

  The movie makes WLMM project is strong on the computer but when it is published on the DVD in Windows DVD Maker it produces a result blur this film as seen on the computer and any DVD player.  It's nothing to do with transitions because the film WLMM is strong.  Other DVD manufacturers produce a sharp image of the film WLMM even, but I prefer the way Windows DVD Maker makes the DVD with scenes, etc...

  The problem seems to lie with the WLMM. creating Windows DVD DVD movie conversion - are they incompatible?  This seems to happen with the version of Windows 7, everything worked fine with versions of Vista on my old computer.  I find it very frustrating to have this return back.  Please suggest a solution.  The version of WLMM is Version 2011 (Build 15.4.3502.0922); I can't find a version number for Windows DVD Maker.

  Update:

  Thanks to Irfan for a potential solution.  I did another DVD with all the filters off but unfortunatey it made no difference.  Having had another close watch the DVD video, the problem is to double everything up like a photo on a slow speed where you have shaking of the camera.  In particular, a girl with wire rim glasses has a rim double wire and even a girl with hair each double strand.  When further looked at what gives the appearance of an image finery.  Again, I must say that the film from which the DVD-video has been done had this failure and from DVD of this film by any other manufacturer of DVD Windows DVD Maker does not exhibit this problem.  The operating system is Windows 7.

  Hello Charley Farley,

  1. What is the operating system installed on your computer?

  You may experience this problem of there are incompatible filters installed on your computer. I suggest that you turn off the filters and check if you have the same problem.

  Video filters in Windows Movie Maker: frequently asked questions for Vista

  Video filters in Windows DVD Maker: frequently asked questions for Windows 7

  You can check out the link below that wil

  You can also ask your question to the Windows Live community to see if someone has had the same problem and fixed it. Please visit the link below to find a community that will support what ask you:

  https://windowslivehelp.com/product.aspx?ProductID=5

  Thank you
  Irfan H, Engineer Support Microsoft Answers. Visit ourMicrosoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Yesterday, I paid $29.99 thinking I was getting Grime Fighter, as I have some dirt, but he tells me that I don't have this feature, why the audit!

  Yesterday, I paid $29.99 thinking I was getting Grime Fighter, as I have some dirt, but he tells me that I don't have this feature, why the audit! What are the characteristics of fact fees cover $29.99

  Do you mean that Avast program: https://www.avast.com/en-us/grimefighter

  We can not probably help you with that here on the Firefox support site, but Avast has a page of support here: https://www.avast.com/en-us/support#grimefighter

• I am trying to install an antivirus program. The program will not install because it establishes that there is another present anitvirus program. Why the new software does think that the other program is still there?

  The antivirus program that program anitvirus I try to install claims is still on my computer came with the computer when it was bought a little more than a year before.  This antivirus program was followed by another antivirus program.  The antivirus program on the computer at the time wherever he bought has been removed until the following antivirus program has been added.  The second antivirus on the computer program has been removed before my attempt to install the third-party antivirus program which States that the original anti-virus software came with the computer is always on it.  The antivirus program that is allegedly still on the computer is not on the list of installed program computer.  None of the two antivirus programs that were on the computer is on the list of installed programs computer.  How can I remove a program that is no longer on the computer?  Why the antivirus program that I try to install again could think that a program is still present on the computer where this program has been deleted if long ago?

  Give this program a go. It is effective to clean up the damage.

  http://www.revouninstaller.com/

  I hope this helps.

• Clock on windows 8 is wrong time, I tried to set the time of the internet but its still not working, think theres a bug in the clock time, anyone have the same problem for windows 8 and know how to fix?

  Clock on windows 8 is wrong time, I tried to set the time of the internet but its still not working, think theres a bug in the clock time, anyone have the same problem for windows 8 and know how to fix?

  It sets obtained :-) Sorry for the delay

  Thank you very much! has worked perfectly!

• Why Lightroom CC will not download Nikon D610 photos, the same problem, I got with lightroom 3 and told me that I had to upgrade.

  Why Lightroom CC will not download Nikon D610 photos, the same problem, I got with lightroom 3 and said to upgrade?

  Make sure you sort the display you are looking at instead of file name recording time. It is in the context menu with a small sign of a to z just below images. Make sure also that you have no active filters.

• My 1st generation iPod touch can not save on my iMac El Capitan but can to my MacBook Snow Leopard ' 08. Why the iMac think that the backup is corrupt?

  Of course, I'm using my iMac El Capitan, but when I bought the music today and went to add to my iPod touch iTunes ended up freezing. Long story short, I could delete the files from the iPod but can not add one; Adding a single song led to suspended iTunes and the cancellation of the synchronization via the iPod of course makes no difference.

  After going through all the rigamarole any attempt to delete all backups for iPod, both through preferences and in/Library/Application Support / MobileSync / Backup, I always had the same problem. I can't add music on my iPod via the iMac, nor can I save it there. Yes, I rebooted.

  And so, after many tears, I pulled out my MacBook ' 08, who narrowly missed the cut for El Capitan and so still has Snow Leopard. And now my iPod backed up very well! (I cursed myself for not to copy previous backup before it was replaced, but hey.) They are all under the same Apple ID, so at this point, I'm simply redownloading all of my new purchases on the ol' MacBook ' so I can add it to the iPod... but how long this will be a viable solution? (I realize using products Apple since 2008 is an affront, but you've got to do what you do I do, and I don't currently have pocket for 32 GB change.)

  So the question. Is there an incompatibility of software between my 1st generation iPod touch (3.1.3) and my iMac (El Capitan with iTunes 12.3.2.35 10.11.3)? Is there really a degree of corruption here than Snow Leopard with iTunes 10.6.8 11.4 (18) does not recognize?

  TL; Dr: I can do my iPod touch backup of my iMac?

  (My apologies for what is the format, I still haven't managed to brevity, and these a few hours researching in it made me frustrated).

  Edit: I forgot to mention that I tried to copy on the backup freshly prepared from the MacBook on the iMac and received the same exact error message.

  See:

  Sync 1 G iPod touch with iTunes 12.3

• Why the message (wuauclt.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close) when I start the computer?

  Operating system - XP

  Message asking if I want to send the problem to Microsoft.

  Hello

  I suggest you to follow these steps and check if that helps:

  Method 1:

  Start the computer in safe mode and check if the same problem occurs:

  http://www.Microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/XP/all/proddocs/en-us/boot_failsafe.mspx?mfr=true

  Method 2:

  Try to perform the clean boot and check if it helps:

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/310353

  NOTE: When you are finished troubleshooting, make sure that you reset the computer in start mode normal such as suggested in step 7 of the above article.

  It will be useful.

• Why the Polish support page does not work?

  Why the Polish support page does not work?

  http://PL.consumer.Toshiba.EU/PL/support/home/support_home?

  I think the error message is pretty clear:

  + Service temporarily unavailable +.
  + The server is temporarily unable to process your request due to downtime or maintenance capacity problems. Please try again later. +

• Why the last Satellite L850-138 display driver is older?

  Last June, Toshiba update the display drivers for my laptop to 9.0... But a few days ago they just pulled out an older version. Why?

  Look at this:

  18/06 / 13--> 9.012 - 121219 a-15688

  24/09 / 13--> 8.932.5.3 - 120120 a

  WTF?

  > But a few days ago they just pulled out an older version. Why?

  Why? I think that this could be answered by Toshiba only. But this is a user to user forum.
  However, I found this doc on the Support from Toshiba page:

  [After sleep mode, a distorted image or a split screen may be displayed: http://aps2.toshiba-tro.de/kb0/TSB3903IB0000R01.htm]

  Display driver AMD V9.12.0.0, which was automatically installed through the Windows Update feature cause some problems. Another update has solved this problem.

  By the way: the drivers are not only for the L850 series but released also for other series.

• Why the key changes from d minor to ground minor Middle song in Garageband?

  Title says it all, why the key automatically changing? I don't even think that you were able to change the key mi song in Garageband 10. It is a problem what I record in garageband after that Exchange (at the 42nd bar) not get moved down to adapt the new change of key. Also it doesn't let me change it back to d minor as anything I click has no effect. How can I stop the key to evolution?

  Thank you.

  Check the path to the conversion.

  In the track menu > see Transposition.

  You can define a conversion on the track, which changes the tone of the song from bar 42.

  

• Why the disc retains when reading startup satellite A500-1GL

  Does anyone know why the disk keeps reading at the start of the A500. I was wondering if this has something to do with the Toshiba startup items - if so, how much is really needed in msconfig?

  The disk is defragmeted and there is no hardware problems.

  There is a normal Internet security so I don't think it's that.

  My a500 guard disc too begins as all computers/laptops.

  To decrease the time of system boot, you must remove some programs/utilities to as boot option below (administration tools)

  http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/2996/startrup.jpg

  As I know tempro takes start system as he scans the updates.

• error code 1 occurs with the construction of the .exe (problem VI) attached

  The problem that I have been with a particular project was published several times by others.  I read through many threads related to this (or rather related to it).  I tried some things but not all.  I finally started turning off sections of my code to see if the error disappeared.  I have followed the attached VI.  The error code is also attached.  Can someone analyze this VI and see what might be the problem?  It uses .NET objects, so I don't know exactly what the compiler is looking for.  I would point out that this isn't my VI, but the one I copied from the forum here.  As far as the e-mail, the VI works very well in development mode, but obviously I desire a standalone application.

  Also note that I have created a new project and dropped this VI on the first level VI and he built a .exe very well, which makes no sense to me. Maybe someone can shed some light on this issue.  When I tried to return to the initial project, it doesn't have the build.  If you have disabled all instances of this VI in my project (using a diagram to disable), generates the project without an error.  Thanks in advance for your help.

  Reese

  Well, I found a solution, but I still don't know why the original VI would not build in my application.  I just created a new VI copied each code section of the original, little by little, build and then copy some more until all has been copied to.  It built without error every time.  It's a head scratcher, but the only thing I can think is, given the original VI was not my code, there may be a current compatibility issue.  But even once, he worked in a new project, so I'm not sure.  The lesson that I learned from this (and I know better), is not to wait until the end of your project in order to perform a build.  Lesson learned!

• Dual Boot with windows XP Pro with 2 HARD drive, error on secondary windows install: "Windows did not start because of a configuration of the disk of the computer problem. Could not read the selected boot disk. Check boot path and disk hardware... »

  Hi, I recently bought a new Hitachi 1 TB internal hard drive. I wanted to do a clean install on the new drive (d), be able to dual boot my computer and leave my old 300 GB disk (C :) as the primary windows installation. After physically installing the new HARD drive, I noticed that "new hardware found" and the the brand name flashed in the bottom right corner. I thought I'd see the new hard drive in my computer, but I did not. I initialized the new HARD drive with the computer management window (right click on my computer - manage) and I also formatted in NTFS (I had to change my printer hard drive letter to assign the new HARD drive with the letter D, but I've made other changes after this step). Now, I could see and use in my main windows on the C: installation. I then installed a windows new copy XP pro with the installation CD I got for my C: but on the D: (Note: I have a Dell computer (and the Dell reinstallation CD) and my current version of windows has SP3 while the installation CD is only SP2) (I also reformatted my HARD drive during the installation of windows to NTFS)

  Now when I try to start on installing the new on my D: I get "Windows did not start because of a configuration of the disk of the computer problem. Could not read the selected boot disk. Check startup disk and hardware access path. "and another line saying to refer to manuals HARD drive and windows.

  My Boot.ini file at this time was:

  [boot loader]
  Timeout = 5
  default = multi (0) disk (0) rdisk (0) partition (2) \WINDOWS
  [operating systems]
  "multi (0) disk (0) rdisk (0) partition (2) \WINDOWS="Microsoft Windows XP Professional "/ noexecute = optin/fastdetect
  "signature (ac516a5c) disk (0) rdisk (0) partition (1) \WINDOWS="Microsoft Windows XP Professional own "/ noexecute = optin/fastdetect

  I looked towards the top of this help page, but for now I'm unlucky:

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/314477

  (The next steps I took by throwing from the Windows CD and go into the repair console)

  I tried to use the bootcfg /rebuild but the line to boot.ini for my secondary HARD drive still does not work.

  He gave me something like:

  [boot loader]
  Timeout = 5
  default = multi (0) disk (0) rdisk (0) partition (2) \WINDOWS
  [operating systems]
  "multi (0) disk (0) rdisk (0) partition (2) \WINDOWS="Microsoft Windows XP Professional "/ noexecute = optin/fastdetect
  "signature (ac516a5c) disk (0) rdisk (1) partition (1) \WINDOWS="Microsoft Windows XP Professional own "/ noexecute = optin/fastdetect

  I also tried to change the signature() to multi (0), but it did not work. (or try almost all possible permutations of disk() and rdisk() partition() 0 to 2).

  I also tried to use expand F(dvd-drive):\i386\ntkrnlmp(I_have_a_duo-core).ex_ D:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe and a few other combinations, but I when I login as D:\windows simply, it fails to extend with a message like "could not develop" or C:\windows I get "restricted access".

  I have not yet tried CHKDSK/r, but since I did a clean install on a newly formatted drive... I don't think it would work.

  I've also marked the partition on the D: as active (in computer management), but it did not help me.

  I've done a first installation of windows repair, strangely, I couldn't fix this one... Still does not work...

  My default windows installation yet works very well & I see that windows has been installed on the D: but I'm ideas from how to operate the dual-boot, can someone throw me a BONE on what to do?

  Maybe try to do something with the Boot Manager (whatever it is?) Create a new partition and use it as a boot manager? I don't really want to do this, because if I made a mistake I will be unable to use my computer and dual boot should work without going through all this trouble... But I found this page: http://technet.microsoft.com/fr-fr/library/ee829686%28WS.10%29.aspx

  Could a clean install two HDD help? I hope I won't have to do...

  Someone has an idea?

  PS: I'm not such an advanced user so I need a solution step by step, thanks!

  Edit: I also noted that I can't see my new HARD drive in my BIOS... weird... SATA-0 is my old drive HARD 1 and 2 are my dvd 3-5 readers are 'off' and it doesn't seem to be anything that it is plugged in. I also have 4 bays for internal HARD disks. Now, 2 are busy.

  Edit2: I looked inside my case and enabled the good Sata in the Bios after a reboot it detected the drive correctly. Dual boot doesn't always work well... The fact that it was disable in the BIOS while I was installing the new HARD drive could change anything? Hmm...

  In case I wasn't clear enough: I had a windows XP Pro installed on my C:, bought a new hard drive and installed the same copy of windows on it (d). I think that should allow me to double boot between the two installs different. Even if for some reason I can't boot from one on my D:. Andrew, I do not understand why you so far physically disconnect the other drive, the point of the whole operation is to build a boot.ini file so that the BIOS knows that it y facilities 2 windows and you allow to choose (and not have conflicting problems between the 2 systems), someone correct me if I'm wrong? "Expand" the part of my first post made reference to one of the solutions provided by Microsoft in the first link that I have included in my previous post (but I can't seem to work).

  In addition, it is the procedure that I followed: http://www.ehow.com/how_5950826_boot-two-different-hard-drives.html

  (except I've had the first installation already done).

  Andrew "also, once a new hd is plugged on the pc & running, most of the BIOS will place (them) as 1st priority hd, set the BIOS to do this", you mean that by installing separately from windows on each unit when the other is not plugged in, I could choose what disk to start from defining their priority in the BIOS once they are all plugged back? It's too tedious (as I intend to move frequently between the 2 installs) and requires a computer to other users of the lack of computer knowledge. Unfortunately, it is not a viable option.

  EDIT: I DID IT! Hmmm... Well, I double checked in the recovery console, the path of the new HARD drive with the arc command Scan. Tried to start again with the MULTI (0) in my boot.ini and it worked... I also had my windows install CD in. Maybe that is why I could not start, windows needs the CD to complete the installation? Weird, I don't know what I did to the difficulty it... but hey, it works! Thanks for your ideas guys!