With two routers wrt320n wireless bridge

Similar Questions

• Problem setting up Port Forwarding with two routers.

  I can't set up by Linksys RT31P2 and routers port forwarding WRT160Nv3.

  My setup is Webstar Modem = RT31P2 = WRT160N = Mac OS 10.6.5. (No configurable modem and ISP do not prevent port forwarding. It comes with two Linksys routers).

  I had a Monty Python-going around with the support of Cisco cat; and follow up with telephone assistance in which the agent knew nothing about port forwarding and his supervisor expressed the view that it was not possible with two routers. Sigh.

  If anyone can help me with step by step specific and simple instructions to configure routers. I know that the basic procedures. I'm not clear, what exactly changes on routers.

  I read that portforward.com has to say and it does not work so I must be misunderstanding something.

  The ip address of my computer is 192.168.1.103.  Are the last three digits of this speech concluded the two routers in the area on the port forwarding page? What other changes should be done what router?

  I know the port numbers that I use are OK because I can implement successfully if I connect to one or other of the routers (but not both), and my software of p2p shows port are open.

  Any help and suggestions most welcome.

  If you set up as I have suggested that you have only a single LAN that will be using in your addresses * 192.168.15 case. So in your case:

  1. change the address LAN IP of 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.15.2 WRT.
  2 disable the DHCP server.
  3. connect the LAN of the WRT port to port LAN of the RT.

  That's all. Disable the DHCP server will not affect whatever it is that you're connected LAN - LAN and DHCP server on the RT is still operational.

  After the change, previously the WRT computers may require a reboot to get a new address 192.168.15. *.

  Your computer to which you are transferring must have an IP static and not dynamic (or variable). Check the current IP information on this computer. It must have an IP address like 192.168.15.103, mask 255.255.255.0, gateway 192.168.15.1 subnet and DNS 192.168.15.1 server or maybe two other IP addresses instead. Note DNS servers if you do not 192.168.15.1.

  Then configure a static IP address on the computer. Use something like 192.168.15.10, 255.255.255.0 gateway 192.168.15.1 and the DNS servers you found before.

  After this implement 192.168.15.10 port forwarding.

• SRI-WAAS with two routers

  Hello!

  Is it possible to have two routers (including one with RSR-WAAS and the other without) on a remote site router without ISR-WAAS to use the ISR-WAAS of the other router? (I have only finddual router with dual WAAS SRI in the CVD).

  Concerning

  Michael

  Hi Michael,

  Yes it is possible.

  However, the Redirect method depends on what type of router without ISR-WAAS is:

  another report of research international-4000:

  You can use AppNav (the two routers in the same groups of Application Controller & the SRI-WAAS as the sole member af of the AV/Waas node group).

  almost any other router:

  You can use WCCP on both routers redirecting to the SRI-WAAS.

  Best regards

  Finn

• URGENT! Two physical network with two subnets completely - no bridges - interface cannot connect both

  This is my urgent problem:

  I have a physical machine with two physical network interfaces. I have a VMWARE player and a virtual machine that must use cards on two different subnets, a public directly to the router and an intranet within the company.

  How can I just say a net card to go on this submarine and the other on the public void?  Go crazy. Help, please.

  Thank you

  P.

  Use the virtual network editor VMware Player, create an additional bridged VMnet and bind each bridged to a different physical network... card VMnet on a virtual machine, create a virtual network adapter on each subnet and bind each virtual network adapter to an another VMnet jumpered.

  For additional help with virtual network Editor, check this KB: VMware KB: using the VMware Workstation virtual network editor

• What is the right way to extend a network with two stations 80211ac wireless fixed extreme apple via ethernet?

  I my house wired with ethernet and have logged as many devices via cat5e as possible. My problem is when I try to connect together the two apple airport extreme base stations and use the second to extend my network I lose the internet connection.  I am able to extend without problems via radio, but since I plugged in the House tried to take advantage of the fastest method by cable.

  Here's my network setup in a nut shell.

  In the basement, I have my router from Verizon Fios (gateway 80211n) currently configured to provide all the space an Ip address via dhcp (disabled wireless)

  Gigabit ethernet port 8 wired via gigabit switch through the cable between the bridge Fios and port 1 of the switch.

  two iMacs wired directly the fios gateway ports 2 and 3

  Base station extreme elementary apple (call it down at the moment) connected to the Fios bridge

  Extreme basestation secondary apple related to extreme primary apple base station

  Cable to switch TV

  Nintendo Wii connected to the switch U

  Apple TV connected to the switch

  Drive Blu - ray connected to the switch

  My mainly the Airport extreme is configured as follows

  connect via DHCP

  Address of the router is set to the Fios router

  FOR DNS, I used back free servers like Google, and level 3

  Wireless is set to create a wireless network

  Security is set to WPA2 Personal

  Turned on 5 GHz and 2.4 and 5 ghz are set to automatic

  Router mode is set to bridge mode off

  Second or first floor Airport extreme config

  Connect using dhcp

  Address of the router is also the Fios router

  Servers DNS is empty

  Wireless settings

  Network is set to extend a wireless network

  the wireless network name reflects my network

  wpa2 personal wireless security game

  Network

  Router mode is grayed out and pondered or bridge mode

  Second or first floor Airport extreme config...

  .. . Network is set to extend a wireless network

  Given that all routers are interconnected by Ethernet, you don't want to configure AirPort Extreme to "Extend a wireless network." This option should be used only if the connection between the wireless base stations. Instead, the two base stations must be configured to "create a wireless network.  This is because that, with them all connected by Ethernet, you have the basis for a network of mobile type.

  With this type of network, each router will broadcast their own Wi - Fi network, but because they will all use the same network name (SSID) and use the same type of wireless security and the password, all the wireless clients will see them as network «one»

• can a wifi with an airport extreme network be extended with two Airport express wireless?

  I have developed successfully the range of my wifi network by connecting an older brick of Airport express to a new airport extreme. Unfortunately, there is a room more than I would like to achieve, so I'm trying to add a second (newer) to bring in this room to get full coverage. When I try to set up in the airport utility it hits an "unexpected error" message continually or breaks down the network. should I change in the settings? the express environment be on something else (like a relay?) in order to allow the new express to join the network? I have reset the factory default final express and tried to let the wizard implemented to extend my existing network.

  I understand that I will sacrifice speed, but there is no way to connect them at the present time. worst case, I should better results if I break through the floor and the extreme of wire in the Middle express?

  Thank you

  David

  Sorry, but Apple will allow you only to wireless "extend" the network once, not two.

  In other words, just about any device that "extends" the network must connect directly to the 'main' router... not to another router that is already expanding the network.

  Another way of saying the same thing... both your need for extensions at about the same distance from the 'main' router and two extensions should be closer to the main router they are to each other.

  You want to continue trying to implement the 2nd AirPort Express Terminal?

  "I should better results if I break through the floor and the extreme of wire in the Middle express?

  
  

  Yes, that would allow you to do what you want, assuming that the 'remote' Express can pick up a good signal of the Middle Express wireless.
  

• The way of writing to a wireless bridge between two different routers.1:broadband and dir 2:dlink 605 l

  I want to bridge.and wireless I can't do that... Please send me how to write to a wireless bridge between two different routers.

  1:broadband
  and
  2:Dlink dir 605 l,

  Hi Mohammed Ehsan Jourah,.

  Thanks for posting the request in the Microsoft community forums.
  I understand that you need to know how to make a wireless bridge between two different routers

  What version of the operating system is installed on the computer?

  To connect multiple computers, install a network adapter in each and run a network CAT5 cabling to connect each one to a hub (and thus the other.) The computer that will serve as a transition will have a standard network card for wired and a wireless network adapter that will connect to the wireless (WAP) access point or gateway on the second network.

  A network bridge is software or hardware that connects two networks or more so that they can communicate. You can create only a single bridge network on a computer, but a bridge can handle any number of network connections.

  You can try the steps at the bridge between two different routers wireless.
  a. determine the coverage area. When using two or more routers, the coverage area should be divided, and each router should be placed in a central location in each subdivision. If you add a wireless router to an existing network, this may mean moving the first router.
  b. decide which router is the main router. The main router is connected to the Internet, a LAN cable or other networks. It should be as close to the wired network connections or who has the best line of sight to another wireless network. In addition, the main router should be a high range router, allowing large tables of State and more users.
  c. buy a spare antenna, as the antennas that come with most routers do not have very good range. Quality omnidirectional antennas can push the range and signal strength of each of the routers, which, in turn, will reduce the cost by allowing routers less cover more space overall.
  d. deploy the primary router carefully. This router is the most important and requires most of the time of installation and options. Set the WEP (Protocol) encryption Service Set Identifier (SSID) and wireless, set up the Internet connection and test the router with some clients (computers). Once you get the main router deployed, deploy other routers should be easy.
  e. deploy the secondary routers, which must be configured to operate in "mode of transition." Secondary routers should be deployed around the perimeter of a large area or 'hot spots' where users placed - for example, will convene a bench Park or the table.

  Links:
  Create a network bridge:
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/create-a-network-bridge

  Add a connection to a network bridge:
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/add-a-connection-to-a-network-bridge

  Hope this information helps you. If you need to get help or information with decision-making wireless bridge between two different routers, I'll be happy to help you.

• two routers E1000 allows to increase the wireless signal

  I have an E1000 router in my office with a cat5 cable going to my room of girls through several doors and some corners. She (recently brought in) also has a router E1000.

  I need to know how to use both routers to increase the signal wireless in his room. I have not tried anything yet.

  The router in my office is configured with the address 192.168.2.1.

  I think that the E1000 does not support the type of internet connection "clipping". Bridge mode would be preferable to use. Be sure to install the latest firmware and see if it does.

  If not, configure it as follows:

  1. connect a computer to the (second) E1000. Open the web interface at http://192.168.1.1/

  2. on the main configuration page, change the address LAN IP of 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.2.2.

  3. on the same page, disable the DHCP server.

  4. save the settings.

  5. unplug the computer and cable cat5 wire in one of the the second E1000 LAN ports. Do not use the internet port of the second E1000!

  Your daughter can use all three remaining LAN ports and the wireless connections.

  For more of a mobile wireless network, the wireless on the two identical (SSID, wireless security, password), don't forget to enable the SSID broadcast, leaving auto channel or use two channels at least 5 apart (e.g. 1 & 6). Customers thus wireless should be able to walk almost invisible between the two access points.

• Network with wireless bridge and Repeater cable

  Hello

  I'm about to set up a network composed of 3 routers. The first router R1 is in the basement of my house, the second router R2 is on the first floor and the third router R3 is on the second floor. My goal is to have a single network in the House full (no subnetting) and wifi available at the 1. and 2. floor - so that I can spend on these two floors with no disturbance.

  R1 connects to the ISP. R1 is a DHCP server for the local network. It has the IP 192.168.0.1 and creates the 192.168.0.0 network. All devices on the network should have an IP address in the range of 192.168.0.1 - 254. WiFi is turned off. It should be possible to connect a wired switch, then the computers to the switch.

  R2 has a wired to R1. R2 should work as a wireless access point. DHCP on the router must be switched off. Units to connect to this access point should get their IP address from the DHCP server on R1 (or they have a static IP address).

  R3 is a Repeater that extends the network R2 wireless.

  My question - what type of routers must choose which supported this configuration (R1, R2, R3))? In particular, I don't know how to configure R2 and R3.

  The routers are DHCP server that manages the network IP address. If you connect two routers, you disable the DHCP server on the 2nd router and set up as a simple access point whose IP address is within the range of the main router (cascaded via LAN to LAN), or you can change the IP address of the router 2nd at a different range and keep its active DHCP server (cascading through the LAN to WAN).

  Here is an article that would explain it better:

  http://KB.Linksys.com/Linksys/UKP.aspx?VW=1&docid=785463d9ecaf4cac84aed245b08d615f_3733.XML&PID=80&r...

• Two routers on the same network wireless?

  Last night I bought a WRT160N, to replace my old WRT54G. The 160N is now in my room, connected to a cable modem. The 160N ethernet ports, I have a cable that goes from my room, through my attic and comes out in my living room. In my living room, I'm willing to hang the cable that comes from my 160N to my WRT54G. Then ports ethernet on my WRT54G, I want to connect my Playstation 3 and Xbox 360. I have this connected physically this way, but the PS3 does not connect to the internet through this wired connection. (Have not tried the Xbox 360)

  Basically, I'm eager to share the connection from my wall between my PS3 and the Xbox 360 so that they both have wired connections. Also, I would like to know if I can have both routers broadcast wireless on the same channel, so they appear as two wireless networks. Is this possible?

  Looks like you will get almost everything on your wish list.  You can have two wireless routers, and they can both diffuse.  Normally, you would use the same SSID for both routers, but different channels.  Your wireless computer automatically selects the channel harder, so you can "roam" between two routers.  However, this "roaming" is not as good as with cell phones, then you should only "roam" when your wireless connection is idle (i.e. not an active download).

  See my post on this topic for more information on the configuration of your system:

  http://forums.Linksys.com/Linksys/board/message?board.ID=Wireless_Routers&message.ID=108928

• Unable to join a homegroup Windows 7 with a network that spans a wireless bridge

  I have two Windows 7 machines that are at the ends of the face of a wired LAN network which connects via a wireless bridge and I am unable to get Windows 7 machines on each side of the brdige to connect to a homegroup created across the bridge.  Perhaps to better illustrate what I mean, here's my network configuration:

  Wireless router:
  Machine from Windows 7 1 (LAN wired to the router)
  Windows XP machine (for LAN cable to the router)

  Wireless Bridge (connect wirelessly to the wireless router):
  Computer Windows 7 2 (LAN wired to the bridge)
  PS3 (wired LAN to the bridge)
  TV (cable LAN to the bridge)

  I use the bridge wireless set up so that I can connect LAN devices wired to the wireless bridge so that they appear to be on the same local network as all other devices on the wireless router (stops to have at home and the bridge wire wireless allows me to expand the scope of all wireless devices I might have).  While all the machines can meet without a problem and I can't even set Windows Media Player to stream video to the PS3 and the TV through its capabilities of DLNA, Windows 7 network mapping server shows not the systems connected to the other end of the gateway wireless as being on the same network (although it shows them); so Windows 7 Homegroup does not see other machines as being on the same network.

  The only thing I can think to do with limitations in TCP/IP regarding a wireless bridge, from the perspective of wireless router all connected to the wireless gateway devices appear to be a device (they all appear under the same physical MAC address as the device only "wireless" that connects to the network is the wireless bridge - who just happens to have three other devices connected to it) even if they are assigned to different (numbers) IP that are in the same subnet, etc.).  So I guess what I'm wondering Windows 7 has a limiation to recognise the devices connected via a wireless bridge?  Has anyone else encountered this problem and found a work around?

  Thank you.

  I had this same problem (unable to connect to a Windows 7 homegroup) on Windows 7 (64-bit) PC behind a wireless bridge using a D-Link DAP-1522 to a D - Link DIR-655 residing on the main network.

  The solution that worked for me was to allow for the "'wireless MAC CLONING ' with 'Source MAC = Auto" on the DAP-1522. "  It also had the beneficial effect of the side to fix a problem on PC behind the bridge where control Panel\All Control Panel Items\Network card cannot display all the network devices.

• WAG120N wireless bridge with E1500

  I have my internet to come into my WAG120N and out wireless. I want to install a wireless bridge between this and an E1500, so I can connect my TV to the E1500 (via ethernet cable) and have access to the internet. Unfortunately, I can run a cable from the WAG120N to the location of the TV. Then she I can get the E1500 filled the WAG120N wireless, I hope I can work around this problem.

  I have updated the firmware on the E1500 bridging support, but from what I can tell that it provides only fill via a cable. Is it far from fill wireless?

  See you soon

  Mike

  1. routers Wireless Linksys don't support wireless connection.

  2. either install 3rd party firmware like dd - wrt or tomato or buy a dedicated wireless bridge and connect the E1500 to the bridge. This way, you can also use the wireless in the E1500 for wireless connections.

  3. another check power line ethernet. It is often a more reliable and quality solution.

• Having trouble getting a Dlink DWL-G820 wireless bridge to work with wrt610n

  I'm trying to get a few dlink wireless bridges to work with wrt610n, but not having a chance.  I left Wrt610n router with the IP default '192.168.1.1' and configured accordingly bridges with addresses "192.168.1.xxx".

  Wireless bridges is not happy.  Any ideas?  Bridges have been working well when I was with the IPS "192.168.0.xxx" with wrt610n

  Sorry guys, the problem was the security setting wireless that I used on the WRT610N, not the addressing system.

  Sorry for the inconvenience.

• A desk with two GPUS is equipped with an SLI bridge?

  As the title says.

  If you order directly from Dell Office with two or several graphics cards, the bridge is included.

• Wireless Bridge, TV are not not in the sharing of multimedia files

  Hi all - any help appreciated. I have just set up my Sony Bravia TV to the internet through a Linksys Wireless Bridge. Had a little trouble but with resets I connected to my network and internet.

  My Pc Vista show two up as servers but when I click on them, only some of the movies that I have on them appears and plays. Number of files is empty, even if there are the mpgs in them. Those who show your work. When I tried to add the tv media sharing in Windows media player 11 or the bridge or the TV show. The settings are ok, the DHCP is activated and the subnet mask is correct. What I am doing wrong?

  Also the Twonky server help? Can I use twonky server to connect to my hard drive NAS, also unrecognized by TV and has most of my saved movies stored on it.
  Thanks for any help you can give.
  Sue

  I decided to use Directv and attached my wireless bridge. It connected and I was able to play videos but again once my network drive was not appear. I probed more deep - went to administrative privileges and found an article on multimedia. Unfortunately the box shares on the network multimedia player has not verified! Control which allowed me to be able to stream all my video to the TV through directv set-top box. the network drive appeared as a server and all is well.

  I use the wireless bridge to connect directly to the TV when I want to access account netflix to my husband or other internet offerings of SONY, but as a coil of general for my stored photos and video I'll stay connected to the directv because it works very well.
  Sue