WRT160N2 Firewall conflict with McAfee

Similar Questions

• Last updated 15/09/2010, white problem Vista task bar and comes into conflict with McAfee

  After a recent automatic update of microsoft windows (10 updates) my taskbar is white and the options in the presentation to return to the colours of vista disappeared, also my real time analysis disabled McAfee.  I restored my laptop updated before updates and reinstalled updates five times and the same problems appear.  I have now the option turned off completely updated.

  Restarting the computer seems to have solved this problem.

  Read this: http://social.answers.microsoft.com/Forums/en/vistawu/thread/03aee0e9-af74-4024-b279-94bdb9a13ebf

  ... and the following links given by the moderator Support Ms.

  Since you already did system restore, I advise you to disable McAfee and run Windows Update.

  P.S if you're open to the evolution of your AV, consider using Avast or Microsoft Security Essentials - both are FREE and are effective.

• How can I resolve conflict with Thunderbird and my ISP (Shaw.ca) provided McAfee?

  When "Real-time scanner" is on, Thunderbird goes to "not responding" for a minute or two and often goes to 100% CPU usage. If I disable "Real-time scanning" TB seems to work very well, but I think I'm vulnerable to viruses. This problem is going on for a few weeks.

  I used to use "Avira" without any problem, but McAfee is provided 'free' for subscribers.

  I saw a report here today of someone who got a chat session with McAfee support and they have "changed some settings" and everything is Ok now. Then I suggest that you contact McAfee for more of the same.

• Windows Defender is legitimate and can be used with McAfee?

  I never noticed before Windows Defender and do not download it.  So I wonder if my copy is legitimate or harmful.  And I use McAfee antivirus.  If it is legitimate, do I use it with McAfee?

  I noticed in the Panel of the icon next to the time in the lower right corner, but it has now disappeared.  It was a symbol of an exclamation mark, then he had a rotating blue circle saying it was scanning after that I started the scan McAfee because I was not familiar with Windows Defender.  But he finished what he was doing and it has now disappeared.  I just wanted to know if it was true or harmful, and if there was all I had to do about it.

  Thank you!

  If you use Vista, Windows Defender is part of the system. It comes with it. It can not be uninstalled either.
  operating
  McAfee has his own defender and run 2 defenders in the same machine allows to create conflicts. McAfee is supposed to close Windows Defender.
  That should explain what you saw, i.e. exclamation mark and others.

  It is ok. You have no problem in this regard.

  For the benefits of others looking for answers, please mark as answer suggestion if it solves your problem.

• Public static political static NAT in conflict with NAT VPN

  I have a situation where I need to create a VPN site-to site between an ASA 5505 using IOS 7.2 and a Sonicwall NSA4500. The problem arises where the LAN behind the Cisco ASA has the same subnet an existing VPN currently created on the Sonicwall. Since the Sonicwall cannot have two VPN both run on the same subnet, the solution is to use policy NAT on the SAA as well as for the Sonicwall, the new VPN seems to have a different subnet.

  The current subnet behind the ASA is 192.168.10.0/24 (The Sonicwall already has a private network virtual created for another customer with the same subnet). I try to translate it to 192.168.24.0/24. The peer LAN (behind the Sonicwall) is 10.159.0.0/24. The ASA relevant configuration is:

  interface Vlan1

  IP 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0

  access extensive list ip 192.168.24.0 outside_1_cryptomap allow 255.255.255.0 10.159.0.0 255.255.255.0

  list of access VPN extended permit ip 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.159.0.0 255.255.255.0

  public static 192.168.24.0 (inside, outside) - list of VPN access

  card crypto outside_map 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap

  In addition, there are other static NAT instructions and their associated ACLs that allow certain traffic through the firewall on the server, for example:

  public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface smtp SERVER smtp netmask 255.255.255.255

  The problem is this: when I enter the static strategy statement NAT, I get the message ' WARNING: real-address conflict with existing static "and then it refers to each of the static NAT statements reflecting the external address to the server. I've thought about it, and it seemed to me that the problem was that policy NAT statement must be the first statement of NAT (it is the last one) so that it is run first and all traffic destined to the VPN to the Sonicwall (destination 10.159.0.0/24) tunnel would be properly treated. If I left him as the last statement, then the other static NAT statements would prevent a part of the 10.159.0.0/24 network-bound traffic to be correctly routed through the VPN.

  So, I tried first to my stated policy NAT upward in the ASDM GUI interface. However, moving the declaration was not allowed. Then I tried to delete the five static NAT statements that point to the server (an example is above) and then recreate them, hoping that would then move up the policy statement NAT. This also failed.

  What Miss me?

  Hello

  I assumed that we could have changed the order of the 'static' , the original orders, but as it did not work for some reason any then it seems to me that you suggested or change, that I proposed should work.

  I guess that your purpose was to set up static political PAT for the VPN for some these services, then static PAT of public network access, then static NAT to policy for the rest of the network in-house.

  I guess you could choose any way seems best for you.

  Let me know if get you it working. I always find it strange that the original configuration did not work.

  Remember to mark a reply as the answer if it answered your question.

  Feel free to ask more if necessary

  -Jouni

• Firefox is in conflict with pxhlpa64.sys

  (1) installed firefox 25 and auditor of race and got the 1st BSOD pxhlpa64.sys

  (2) installed run fix automatix and fix all clicked again.

  (3) restarted with the Auditor, got the 2nd pxhlpa64.sys BSOD

  (4) automatic fix does not resolve pxhlpa64.sys.

  (5) Firefox uninstalled, run the checker no. BSOD

  100000% sure for my conclusion that firefox is in conflict with pxhlpa64.sys.

  With firefox installed, two of my discs were read and write, but not safe for writing perfect.

  Fix it please I run win7 64 bit, registered.

  http://www.SevenForums.com/BSOD-help-support/295136-BSOD-restart-watching-DVD-incomplete-start-11.html#post2611617

• Satellite R840 - 12 c - conflict with the RFBUS "Bluetooth."

  My Toshiba Satellite R840 - 12 c has a problem with bluetooth.

  On the Device Manager tab, I see a conflict with the RFBUS "Bluetooth."
  So my bluetooth setting does not work... In other words my laptop cannot detect bluetooth despite being bluetooth devices "on"...

  > Tab in Device Manager, I see a conflict with the "Bluetooth RFBUS.
  So uninstall the device first, then download the stack of BT from Toshiba BT portal and after reboot again install this new.
  http://APS2.toshiba-tro.de/Bluetooth/

• Re: Satellite P300 - conflict with the display driver

  Yesterday, I suddenly had a conflict with my display driver. While working on my laptop, a blue screen appeared and then the screen went black and stayed like that. When you use an external monitor, it is possible to start in SafeMode (in normal mode, a blue screen appears). It is possible that a Windows Update has occurred, but I can nog
  cancel anything (no Windows recovery point).

  I uninstalled the display driver and downloaded the latest version, but it doesn't seem to help. Reinstalling Windows won't work or the other cause the installation DVD detects a hardware error (the display driver).

  Does anyone knows how to fix this?

  Kind regards
  Jeroen

  Hey Buddy,

  > Reinstall Windows won't work or the other cause the installation DVD detects a hardware error (the display driver).
  What Windows disk, you used exactly?
  Normally before starting with the installation of Windows, you must format the hard disk and create partitions. If everything is clean at the disk Windows installation starts.

  I advise to use the Toshiba recovery disc. This disk can restore the original settings of the case and before Installation starts the drive HARD to wipe completely.

• El capitan is in conflict with my printer.

  El capitan upgrade is in conflict with my Kodak printer. I would like to delete el capitan from my computer. How can I do?

  El Capitan is the operating system. You can not remove it. The computer would not go.

  What do you mean, exactly, by "competitor" with your printer?

  Barry

• 800 - 030qe envy: conflict with the new video card

  I bought and installed an EVGA GEForce GTX960 graphics card and discovered a conflict with the SATA cable on the motherboard connector. EVGA has recommended that I find a SATA cable with a connector at right angles. Can anyone suggest a source for a suitable cable? Mine is red (?).

  @bobsun2, welcome to the forum.

  This is a cable that should work for you.

  Please click on the button + Thumbs up if I helped you and click on accept as Solution If your problem is resolved.

• Problems with Mcafee and Windows 7

  Running with * Windows 7 *.

  Since the renewal of the subscription with * mcafee *, was nothing else than problems trying to update / download the new version of mcafee, resulting * bluescreen crashes *.

  Has anyone else experienced this problem?

  If so you managed to fix the problem and how?

  Hello

  Do you have uninstalled the previous version and clean the registry? Personally, I don't use Mcaffee. I took it at the beginning. :)

• Toshiba software conflicts with Microsoft and prevent the wireless connection

  The Toshiba Software on this laptop I have is causing a conflict with Microsoft software and I can't connect wirelessly to an ad - hoc network. Wireless Auto configuration does not automatically start as Toshiba Software is causing a conflict, above, this rolling. If you have also encountered this problem please can you me what you can do to permanently solve this problem? For the moment, I have to go through a process of manually start the Wireless Zero Configuration services and fiddling around with disable and then re-enable wireless network connections if I'm lucky then it finally works, and I have internet! If you are unsure how to permanently solve this problem you know what the telephone support number is for Toshiba UK?

  Thank you very much

  John

  Hello John

  What model of laptop and operating system are you using?
  Do you use the preinstalled original Toshiba OS?

  If you want to talk with Toshiba Toshiba s call hotline in the United Kingdom. The number is on the Toshiba UK support page.

• HP laptop Pavilion 15 PC - 'rootkit' file scanned with McAfee

  When running an analysis of complete systems using McAfee, scan has stalled on a file named "rootkit".  I chatted with McAfee, and they asked for a tool that has corrected the problem.  However, when I ran another scan I noticed that one of the files that have been done scroll as the performed analysis was "rootkit" - which contained no other identifiers.  This time the scan does not get stalled on the file, but I wonder if this file has to be on my computer?

  At the heart of the expression 'rootkit' is two words-'root' and 'kit '. Done root referring to the Almighty, "Administrator" account on Unix and Linux, and kit refers to a set of programs or utilities that allow someone to maintain the root-level access to a computer. However, another aspect of a rootkit, beyond maintaining root level access, is that the presence of the rootkit must be undetectable.
  
  Related: http://netsecurity.about.com/od/frequentlyaskedquestions/f/faq_rootkit.htm
  
  See this:
  
  http://service.mcafee.com/faqdocument.aspx?id=TS102052&lang=en-US&prior_tid=1165787117&AnswerID=16777216&turl==http%3A%2F%2Fkb.mcafee.com%2Fagent%2Findex%3Fpage%3Dcontent%26id%3DTS102052%26actp%3Dsearch%26viewlocale%3Den_US&searchid=1403288518673
  
  https://community.McAfee.com/thread/60548

• Windows system error: there is an IP address conflict with another system with the network. How do I remove this error message?

  I just installed a new internet provider and all of my connections are working fine, but I constantly get this "Windows system error: there is an IP address conflict with another system with the network." I have my electrician of the internet modem connected to my office. I have also two wireless devices connected to the appearance of the Modem wireless. I constantly get this error message mentioned above, and I want to get rid of it.

  This means that all that he says.  Your Windows system has an address that already exists on your local network.  Turn your system off and use a working system to locate this address and to which unit he belongs.  In most LANs, the router's DHCP server.  You may be able to ask the router which addresses are used and see what device uses this address, but I suspect not.

  Duplicate addresses can occur when two systems received the same address manually, or when we got an address in the DHCP of the router range. It is unclear when this happened because he is not in control of the address and puts the address duplicate to a second system.  You need to track down, ensuring that all addresses manually asigned are out of the DHCP range, that you book the address of the router, if you want the device to use this address, or configure all devices to request the address of the router using DHCP.

• SQL statement error INSERT The conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint

  I recently installed a reporting for vmware vsphere software, but I get a SQL error. I opened a request for assistance with vmware, but so far they have not come up with a solution. The error is caused by: com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: instruction INSERT The conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint 'FK_CB_VSM_NETWORK_VC_ID '. The conflict occurred in database 'VCChargebackVCC02', table "dbo." " CB_VSM_SERVER', column 'VC_ID '. I don't know a lot about SQL, so I'm lost in the extent of troubleshooting is concerned. If anyone has any ideas I'd love to hear them.

  SQL questions are better posed on Technet.  They are better equipped to manage the

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/categories/