Reapproval IN.

We have a purchase order that has been approved for 415 k, and later it was changed to 385 k.

It was rerouted for approval again.

The price was 1 and the amount has been changed from 415 k to 385 k, which is less than 10%.

Shouldn't it be automatically approved, as the initial purchase order has been approved for a higher amount.

Pls. suggest as to what caused his reapproval routing... ?

Appreciate your help.

Thank you

I don't think that the system has the approval logic coded in a way that it will mark the fi automatically approved IN. its a lesser amount than the previous amount. Its as if there is no change on the PO it will be submitted again for approval. The system also provides revisions that are made. Take a look at the rev field near the PO number.

Thank you

Tags: Oracle Applications

Similar Questions

  • How to reapprove a request approved?

    My problem is that I've changed an approved purchase order, which requires the re-registration due to the tolerance of price, but the system has sent a message of error that the application related to ALSO requires re-registration. However the requisition cannot be opened because it is approved. It seems to be a vicious circle. What is the solution in this case? Thanks in advance... Szabolcs

    Hello

    Maybe after action plan help you...

    (1) cancel the line of PO in which you this review.
    (2) returns the PR using automatic creation.
    Navigation path: Autocreate > requisition find corresponding in. > tools > request return

    (3) it will take your request to the State of RETURN.
    (4) open PR, make the necessary changes and create the PO again with add to the PO / IN. new option.

    concerning
    Sanjay

  • Sites on the list are now blocked

    Summary of the issue
    Other issues of Windows Live family safety

    What version of Windows Live Family Safety do you use?
    Version 2011 (15.4.3538.513)
    Choose your operating system version:
    Windows 7

    Additional details
    My son has a filter "allowed list only" on his account, however, sites I have on the list of my son are now blocked and even if I try to reapprove them, they are always blocked.  I tried everything I can think of.  It is obviously not a computer problem because it does the same thing on the computer and the laptop.  Help, please!

    I did the following and it fixed the problem where the authorized sites were blocked:

    1. remove the PC from the parental control Web site (they get automatically added when you go through the following steps)
    2 turn off parental control on the PC under control panel, the Parental control (in the drop-down list, select 'None')
    3 reset (perhaps not required, but I still just to be sure everything is reset)
    4 re - activate parental control on the PC under control panel, the Parental control (in the drop-down list, select "Windows Live Family Safety")
    5. from the Parental control, select the user account that you want to activate for parental control and go through the standard process
    6. connect to the family Web site security and web to DISABLE filtering for the account, click Save.
    7. right click on the parental control in the right lower bar icon and select "open family safety filter.
    8. click on the circular icon blue arrows in the upper right corner of the dialog box to refresh the parental control settings.
    9. open a few websites to ensure that you can access.
    10 sign in to the family safety website again and ENABLE web filtering for the account, click Save.
    11. yet once, click on the circular icon blue arrows in the upper right corner of the dialog box to refresh the parental control settings.
    12 should now work (work sites permit, unauthorized sites do not work)

    I did these steps on each of my children PCs and they work now.

    Rensul

  • Problem with PO matching with invoice

    Hi gurus,

    My question is, I have an order form located in the State of OPENING and APPROVED and having the PO amount is $ 100.

    now, I have received an invoice from vendor with the amount of $70 against this in. so now that I have to pay this Bill because of the amount of $70 by matching with the PO and I must close this IN. because it remains a last match and I don't want the salary amount remains. so if make he going to make permanent the amount balance? How can I handle this scenario?

    any suggestions?

    Thanks in advance.

    Rama

    Hello

    1:If case no reception only is made then you can ask the buyer to the purchase order to adjust the amount in the PO and reapprove, then you can match it to reception of invoice

    Case 2:

    If you have finished with the receipt of $100, then Bill with $70 game and create a $ 30 for the vendor debit memo

    Case 3:

    If you did receive $ 70 and then pair it with our $70 Bill and let IN. stay open for $30 each time that you receive the invoice against it is the same and close for invoicing.

  • check the craeting GL account in shopping

    Hello

    I met warning meesage when executing accountant creation in Purchasing and I hope that we canresolve with your help.

    After that I ran the creation request purchase of business accounting, out of putting warning indicates execution and receipt number with a transaction date that is within a close period. Here is the error message:

    The GL date July 17, 2014 is not in an open or a future period entrable.
    Please select a valid date of GL or open the period.

    I found the problem in the application, I got there a problem (No. 740) which has been receive and deliver on unfounded period (July) but the transmitted IN. againg and reapprove in the new period. (the last update is in the month of August), I think that's the reason sysstem wants there once again, but I'm not sure that this PO is counted on July or not?

    I'm kinda newbie question finance in oracle, and I don't know how to write a query that I can be sure that this PO is in July?

    and how can I fix this problem? ignore the thewarning or something else?

    Dears

    I had this receieved users and delivered a few items after the creation of accounting last month and they changed the date of the operation manually in the period from July, it was my fault, because I didn't close the month after the creation of accounting.

    for anyone who has the same problem, I did this:

    run create accounting with just a transfer to GL = Yes post GL = no, then I went through GL entry and change the period.

  • Document re-registration rules - IN. configurations

    Hi team,

    Can you please help us to identify the related configurations Document reapproval Application rules.
    Here are the details we wanted to check workflow or request of related facilities.

    Date promised
    Need-per day

    We're on 11i Application. Tell us the navigation to find them.

    If you open the PO approval workflow, you'll see a process called ' changes require reapproval.
    Open the process, locate the package used.
    In the package, Oracle sets the status of the purchase order to the re-registration required. Put the stated case that looks like by date in comment.

    Sandeep Gandhi

  • Approval and change the order of the IN.

    EBS 11.5.10.2

    He observes and seems the standard features that, when changes are made to approved PO, it revises and modifies the State in the re-registration required. This seems to happen even when the fields as the description of the object, etc. this need per day are changed and metalink says it's intended function. MetaLink shows ER requesting this feature.

    Our requirement is

    1. he should go for the re-registration only when the amount is changed by 1%. It seems that this can be achieved by using workflow tolerances.
    2. he should not go to the reapproval when other fields are changed. or at least it shouldn't go through the hierarchy when the other fields are changed. The buyer who made the change should be able to approve whatever the authorized ceiling.

    For large amount of PO, even small changes made by a buyer goes through the trust hierarchy and senior management is not like that.

    Please advice if you came across this and how did you get this.

    Thank you
    RK

    Published by: RK on July 11, 2011 08:55

    Approval of Oracle IN. w/f has a step called
    "Changes require reapproval. (Process) »

    You can change this step to add your custom logic (such the m slipped by less a week the date change, jump approval)

    Hope this helps,
    Sandeep Gandhi

  • Impression of PO at the exit of approved only IN.

    Hi gurus,

    Currently, output PO to the Communication provides an exit even if the purchase order is not yet approved. What changes should I apply this report planted so that it will provide output only if the OP is already approved. I use R12.

    Thank you.

    I tried on my system, that it works correctly when I enter YES for the "Approved" parameter
    I agree with a PO and it prints.
    I change status becomes reapproval requires.
    It does not print.
    I submit for approval, so status changes in the process.
    It does not print.
    I reject so status changes to rejected.
    It does not print.
    I reapprove it.
    It prints.

    Make sure you are running correctly.

  • Query in detail what are the join conditions that miss me in the PO

    Hi Experts,

    I have the query below, without a DISTINCT after SELECT keyword it returns the lines 496 605, but when I include SEPARATE just 6 898 files.
    Please help me to avoid duplicates, if there are means other than the use of SEPARATE.
    SELECT DECODE(hou.organization_id, 103, 'HQ', 104, 'RCBU', 158, 'JCBU', hou.name) "Operating Unit"
         , h.attribute4 "PR Number"
         , h.segment1 "PO Number"
         , h.creation_date "Creation Date"
         , DECODE(h.cancel_flag, 'Y', 'Cancelled',
                                  DECODE(h.authorization_status, 'APPROVED', 'Approved', 
                                                                 'REJECTED', 'Rejected', 
                                                                 'IN PROCESS', 'In-Process',
                                                                 'REQUIRES REAPPROVAL', 'Reapproval',
                                                                 'Incomplete'))"Status"
         , d.document_subtype "Type"
         , p.full_name "Buyer"
         , h.currency_code "Currency"
         , pv.vendor_name "Vendor"
         , pvs.vendor_site_code "Vendor Site"
         , ll.inspection_required_flag "Acceptance Required"
         , l.quantity * l.unit_price "PO Amount"                            
         , l.line_num "Line No."                                            
         , plt.line_type "Line Type"                                        
         , mc.concatenated_segments "Category"                              
         , msi.segment1 "Item"                                              
         , l.item_description "Item_Description"                            
         , l.unit_meas_lookup_code "Unit"                                   
         , l.unit_price "Unit Price"                                        
         , hla.location_code "Ship-To Location"                             
         , ll.promised_date "Promised Date"                                  
         , l.quantity * l.unit_price "Quantity/Amount Ordered"              
         , rsl.quantity_received * l.unit_price "Quantity/Amount Received"
         , rt.amount_billed "Quantity/Amount Billed"
    FROM po.po_headers_all h
       , po.po_lines_all l             
       , po.po_document_types_all_b d
       , po.po_agents poa
       , hr.per_all_people_f p
       , apps.po_vendors pv
       , apps.po_vendor_sites_all pvs
       , po.po_line_locations_all ll
       , apps.po_line_types plt
       , apps.mtl_categories_b_kfv mc
       , inv.mtl_system_items_b msi
       , hr.hr_locations_all hla
       , hr.hr_all_organization_units hou
       , po.rcv_shipment_lines rsl
       , po.rcv_transactions rt
       --, apps.po_lookup_codes lc
    WHERE h.po_header_id = l.po_header_id
    AND ll.po_line_id = l.po_line_id
    AND p.person_id = poa.agent_id 
    AND pv.vendor_id = h.vendor_id                                     
    AND pvs.vendor_site_id = h.vendor_site_id
    AND mc.category_id = l.category_id
    AND msi.inventory_item_id = l.item_id
    AND d.document_subtype = h.type_lookup_code
    AND l.line_type_id = plt.line_type_id          
    AND hla.location_id = h.ship_to_location_id    
    AND rsl.po_line_id = l.po_line_id              
    AND rt.shipment_line_id = rsl.shipment_line_id 
    AND rt.po_header_id = h.po_header_id           
    AND rt.po_line_id = l.po_line_id               
    AND h.creation_date BETWEEN p.effective_start_date AND p.effective_end_date
    AND pv.vendor_id = pvs.vendor_id
    AND hou.organization_id = h.org_id    
    AND h.org_id = pvs.org_id                                          
    AND ll.po_header_id = h.po_header_id
    AND ll.ship_to_location_id = hla.location_id
    AND d.document_type_code = 'PO'
    Thank you
    Nestor

    You're certainly missing the following

    and poa.agent_id = h.agent_id
    and rt.transaction_type='RECEIVE'
    and msi.organization_id = ll.ship_to_organization_id 
    

    and you may need the following

    and rt.po_line_location_id = ll.line_location_id
    and rsl.po_line_location_id = ll.line_location_id 
    

    Hope this helps,
    Sandeep Gandhi

  • Does CPSA net against approved applications

    Hi all

    I pulled a few Requistions approved CPHA Workbench tool. After this, I restarted my data collection process & launched CAWC plan reviewing fresh recommendations. However, I still see CAWC asking me to release new applications well that I published in my last run. I have not changed the forecast nor have I added new sales order requests. Is - this net CAWC against approved applications?

    Thanks for the help.

    Sandeep

    Hi Sandeep,

    First check if you can see the PO/PR in data collection (collections workbench).
    If you don't see it then it is probably a problem with not updated Planning Manager MTL_SUPPLY. Select the % of members in MTL_SUPPLY columns if they are met for the PO/PR in question.
    If they are not check that planning Manager works well (MRP - setup - planning Director).
    To run and % of MEPs columns are null, then make a slight change to the PO/PR and reapprove. Wait until Planning Manager has done at least one cycle. MTL_SUPPLY must be updated then.
    Subsequently remember PO / PR

    It may be useful
    Geert

Maybe you are looking for

  • Location of the file of LabVIEW for Instrument custom

    We have a DLL for a developed in-house CAN interface we call a HOLY area.  One of our engineers has written a DLL it and uses in the testbed.  We were hoping to use LABView.  I guess I have two questions... 1. If it works on test bench, can expect us

  • Insert an individual to cells - EXCEL

    Hello world I would write my measurement results in an excel file. In Excel, I need a well-organized structure. Not just throw the values in the file. I need to start writing in excel from a cell specific, e.g. B1, 3. Is this possible with the standa

  • How can I access my music folder by using the start menu. I'm used to be able to do.

    When I turned on my computer this morning, I wanted to go to my music folder that I normally have access using the 'start' button in the lower left corner of the screen. Normally, I get instant access. Today, I get a message that needs to close Inter

  • A way to load external files in applications WebWorks

    Hi all I am facing the following problem. My application is able to play the animation sequences of 16 colors on a screen of matrix of LED 34 x 18. I am working on a set of tools that make it relatively easy for people to create their own animations

  • problems with signal activeTabChanged

    Hello Ive tried to trigger an action when some tabs are launched for this that I though "Hey the activeTabChanged signal is perfect!", but for some reason any (I may implement the wrong way) it ever triggers the signal. That's how I apply: QObject::c