ACS 5.1 authentication and ACE

Similar Questions

• Cisco ACS 5.2 authentication and authorization processes

  I am designing a network and I asked me a few questions that I don't know how respond to those so I thought putting it in the forum to see if I can get help.

  First, thank you very much for reading this post and thank you if you can add comments to help out me.

  installation program:

  Two ACS on each center data in Server and application to the switches by dc + hybrid mode the Ganymede and fold to the other on the failure scenario.

  ACS - version 5.2 planning upgrade to 5.8, if she is stable.

  Result of the will

  If users fails authentication AD then it should be rejected.

  If defective AD on ACS and ACS needs to check the other ACS and other ACS has connection AD, then it should demand more diver ACS...

  I'm sure it is not possible, but that it was the main application... I disputed so now the new request

  If AD fails ACS should fall back to the local database. If the local database is not authenticte then it should allow to switch to interrogate the same request of ACS secondary rather then to reject the application.

  Litt: local database is reserved for the network admin but maybe some contractor need to access switches and other devices and they will have the entry in listing so if fails AD, they can always authenticates agaist DC2 AD via DC2 ACS.

  I think to set up

  Authentication rule 1 - authenticate again AD,

  If authentication failed - Reject

  If usernot has been found - reject

  If the process failed - continue

  This should take by default which will be the internal database.

  If authentication failed - Reject

  If the user has not found - drop

  If the process failed - drop

  This should give no answer to switch and then switch should try the second radius server in the list...

  Please someone explain this flow chart for me... and it's correct assumptions...

  I would like to know if there are a few good diagram that I can refer to see the whole process and can use in my presentation...

  Thank you very much for reading and you answer it...

  Hello

  I'm not sure I get your question, but I will try to answer in the way that I understood.

  If you send a drop as a result, this means that ACS deposited the request, causing the AAA client to try again another failure on toward another AAA server.

  A tree had fallen on the community a few years ago:

  (https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11811801/aaa-servers#3931298)

  

  

  I hope that's what you are pregnant.

• Authentication Radius ACS with WLC 5508 and AD 2012 5.5 failure

  Hello

  I need help on these errors.

  Here is my configuration: WLC 5508 7.6.130.0-> ACS 5.5.0.46-> AD 2012

  I have (2) errors in ACS 5.5

  12514 EAP - TLS failed SSL/TLS handshake because of unknown CA in the client certificate chain

  22044 result of identity politics is configured for certificate-based authentication methods but based received password

  Already installed the CA cert and cert local in ACS as well as in the client PC.

  Please see screenshots

  OK, in this case:

  1. you will need to properly configure the Windows pleading before that this can work. You need to set the type of authentication and the trusted certification authority. If the certification authority is not available in the list of certificates, you need to import

  2. If you do PEAP then your identity store should be Active Directory and no profile authentication certificate. The certificate authentication profile is used for the basis of certificates (EAP - TLS) authentication.

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• WLC4402, SSC 4.0, EAP FAST with ACS 4.1.23 and Active Directory

  Hi all

  I have a problem where my client software SSC (Cisco Secure Services)-wireless on laptops don't will authenticate the windows domain users if they enter the user name and passwords manually. The unique signature feature will not work. I am using EAP-FAST. It is an ACS appliance based server that I restored from the recovery CD.

  When I look at the failure of authentication request I can see that she is trying to send [email protected] / * / during an attempt to SSO on. The log shows that it is a bad user name or password. Note that the end of the domain name is missing.

  I can see the authentication attempt in the log of the remote agent (CSWINagent.log) on the domain controller, so I don't know that it sends the connection request to the domain controller. The Remote Agent is the same version as the ACS server. When I authenticate successfully (manually) it sends not the domain part of the user.

  This is a new installation. Initially, I had 2 remote agents, both on the service domain controllers has been run under an account with sufficient privileges windows domain administrator. After a planned turn off weekend windows authentication has stopped working completely. I found a post in this forum that says to use the local system to start the remote agent service. This led windows authentication to life, but now I have this problem. I don't know that until I changed it the manual connection is also required in domain (IE user domain\username). I can't be sure that this is the case!

  Can anyone help me to get windows AD to accept these credentials, because they are sent to the client connection? Otherwise if I can make it work with the user account, he worked with initially then that would be great.

  Thank you very much

  As you mentioned that SSC transmits the username "[email protected] / * /" in SSO.

  Is what I think for the moment, to use the feature of Distribution of Proxy on ACS.

  that is, demand to come as it is "[email protected] / * /', let's make ACS Stip off"@domaine"and"username"to RA for AD verification."

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_server_for_windows/4.1/user/NetCfg.html#wp342969

  After stripping '@domaine' send the request back to the ACS it itself, i.e. in the column forward to, ensure that we have input of the ACS.

  And let me know if it works for you?

  Kind regards

  Prem

• age of empires 3 product lost key.is there a way I can get the key.i have the box and cert of authenticity and all code cd

  age of empires 3 product lost key.is there a way I can get the key.i have the box and cert of authenticity and all code cd

  Hi barryholt,

  You can see the following article for more information on the same.

  How to get a new product key for Microsoft Games for Windows, Streets & Trips, or MapPoint

• Just installed via Steam Fable III. Just after authentication and signature in the game finished

  Just installed via Steam Fable III. Just after authentication and signature in the game finished. Solutions?

  original title: Fable III does not start yet. Solution?

  Hello
  You can try to fix the game and check if it helps. If the problem persists then try to uninstall and reinstall the game.
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/uninstall-or-change-a-program

• Kerberos authentication and use the KTPASS tool

  I work in support to a network analysis software company.  We have the ability to use Kerberos authentication for our product.  Recently, we found that when you generate the keytab file using ktpass on a Windows Server 2003 or 2008, it is a step backwards in the process.  Eventually do you run the ktpass twice to get the keytab file good.

  Our external authentication module is software that uses Kerberos authentication and then he puts it on a remote client computer to access our software. We configure our Kerberos application and then read from the file keytab generated on a Windows Server 2003 or 2008 domain controller by using Kerberos V5 found in the AD domain controllers.

  When you run the ktpass tool, you must submit the username and password to generate the keytab file.  When it is generated, there is a generated KVNO number / incremented in the keytab file.  But it writes the file first and then updates the KVNO + 1 number in the actual key stored in AD.  If your keytab file is always number 1 behind what is actually stored in AD!

  We can fix it by running ktpass once,

  Examine the properties for the KVNO number in the last keytab file

  Re-run the ktpass, but number KVNO + 1

  The keytab file is generated, AD wrote the new KVNO + 1 number in AD

  But now our keytab file matches KVNO number generated by AD

  We lose a step in the ktpass tool?

  is there a way to see what the current number of KVNO is set in AD

  We have tested extensively with Windows 2003 and Windows 2008 R2 domain controllers

  The guests were the two Windows 7 Prof 64 bit

  Was just curious if anyone has had this experience?

  Thanks in advance,

  Terry Ball

  Hello Terry,

  According to the description of the problem, it seems that you are working on Windows server 2003 and 2008. I would recommend posting your query on the Server Forums TechNet for Windows.

  TechNet is watched by other computing professionals who would be more likely to help you. Please check the below link which will redirect you to the appropriate forum.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?Forum=winserver8gen

  Hope that the information provided is useful. Let us know if you have questions related to Windows, we will be happy to help you.

  Kind regards

• Order of port re-auth authentication and switch / stop of the session

  Hi all

  We are implementing an ISE (1,4) and met regarded questions on the agenda of the authentication and a stop of the session after posture in line. We got mab, dot1x as authentication order (priority of authentication is set to dot1x, mab). We have configured a reauthentication in the ports of the switch. Windows uses begging all-connect NAM (see 4.2) to dot1x and posture. During the re-authentication, either all-connecting NAM or switch does not start an eapol start and switch allows the session to the MAB, where - as when seen dot1x and mab authentication switch order generates eapol start. The switches are 3750 (15.0 (2) SE8).

  Any possibility we could force the switch/NAM agent sent an eapol start during re-auth?

  Regarding the posture, posture once conform for an endpoint (after dot1x authentication passes) following a judgment of the ISE manual session for an endpoint, switch creates a new session in ISE changes and switch the State of the unknown port to posture. Posture ise AC client still shows status of complaint of posture in the endpoint. It seems do not know about the stop of the session. During NAM endpoint agent session performs a re-auth component however posture remains unchanged "in line".

  Does anyone have experience this problem?.

  Thanks in advance.

  Concerning

  GA

  Hi Gaj-

  I had the similar problem in the past and for setting the following attribute:

  Termination-action-AVPair attribute modifier = 1

  Give that a go and let us know if you still have any questions.

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Registration for authentication and crossing area of Jabber

  Hello

  I used TMS 13.1.2 as authentication source LDAP for VCS-control and VCS Expressway, but noticed, that not all passwords are synchronized correctly in the LDAP H.350 MSDS database, because the user is recorded in two entries. I went to the local authentication, including the database configuration on VCS - C and the local database with the transmission by proxy SIP VSC-E to the VCS - C records. It works fine and I am able to make calls.

  I created the search on VCS highway rules to replace all aliases MCU to an auto attendant external special. Stored locally on the VCS-E endpoint points are allowed to call internal aliases. I tried to do the same for the Jabber Clients, which is recorded in the crossing area of the VCS - C. This works as expected, because the Jabber Clients are not enrolled in a local area and SIP GUEST is not in dispute.

  I expect that all the Jabber client message will be challenged by the VCSE, but this isn't the case. Accordingly, the guest of the SIP protocol is treated as an external user and not an intern.

  May 9 10:11:28     tvcs: UTCTime="2012-05-09 08:11:28,425" Module="network.search" Level="INFO": Detail="Search rule 'my.domain proxy registrations' did not match destination alias [email protected]/* */'"
May 9 10:11:28     tvcs: UTCTime="2012-05-09 08:11:28,423" Module="network.sip" Level="INFO": Dst-ip="84.113.206.194" Dst-port="62503" Detail="Sending Response Code=100, Method=INVITE, To=sip:[email protected]/* */, [email protected]/* */"
May 9 10:11:28     tvcs: UTCTime="2012-05-09 08:11:28,419" Module="network.sip" Level="INFO": Src-ip="84.113.206.194" Src-port="62503" Detail="Receive Request Method=INVITE, Request-URI=sip:[email protected]/* */, [email protected]/* */"

  These are the rules of research that I was talking about:

  110     Enabled     "local registered to Traversal"     LocalZone      No      Alias pattern match      Regex      ^(.*)@my.domain$      Leave      Continue      TraverselZone
115     Enabled     "authenticated to internal"     Any      Yes      Alias pattern match      Regex      ^(.*)@my.domain$      Leave      Continue      TraverselZone
120     Enabled     "mcu all to 899"     Any      No      Alias pattern match      Regex      ^(900\d*|conference)@nts\.eu$      Replace      Stop      TraverselZone

  Is it possible to allow the Jabber Clients to be authenticated on the VCS-E, so a search rule can aply?

  Thanks for your help!

  You get the 'Preparation device' key for your VCS-E so its free.

  It may require a valid service contract.

  I have the provisioning again running on a cluster of VCS - E in my lab, works very well.

  In ancient times that the deployment has not officially supported, it was running great in any case :-)

  Did not check if its now a deployment with support.

  I don't know enough about your deployment to say what would be the best for you.

  There will be some scenarios where not all features can be deployed together for some reason any.

  Maybe someone can help you by looking at how implementation could be done better.

  If you have authentication and integration of ads, that you need to connect

  the VCS-E announced as well. Endpoints (at least for now) is not auth via AD, but you could

  use a database of h.350 (could also be hosted with AD) or the local authentication database.

  Now, which is also spread by TMS, could be an answer to your question as well.

• order of the authentication and authorization air ISE

  Hello

  I am looking to configure ISE to authenticate joined AD PC (Anyconnect NAM help for user authentication and the machine with the EAP chaining) and profile Cisco IP phones. The Pc and phones connect on the same switchport. The switchport configuration was:

  switchport
  switchport access vlan 102
  switchport mode access
  switchport voice vlan 101
  authentication event fail following action method
  multi-domain of host-mode authentication
  authentication order dot1x mab
  authentication priority dot1x mab
  Auto control of the port of authentication
  MAB
  added mac-SNMP trap notification change
  deleted mac-SNMP trap notification change
  dot1x EAP authenticator

  The configuration above worked well with authentication sessions 'show' of the switch showing dot1x as the method to the field of DATA and mab for VOICE. I decided to reverse the order of authentication/priority on the interface of the switch so that the phone would be authenticated first by mab. As a result, the authentication sessions 'show' of the switch showing mab as a method for both VOICE and DATA.

  To avoid this I created a permission policy on ISE to respond with an "Access-Reject" when the "UseCase = Lookup host" and the endpoint identity group was unknown (the group that contains the PC AD). This worked well worked - the switch would attempt to authenticate the PC and phone with mab. When an "Access-Reject" has been received for the PC, the switch would pass to the next method and the PC would be authenticated using dot1x.

  The only problem with this is that newspapers soon filled ISE with denys caused by the authorization policy - is possible to realize the scenario above without affecting the newspapers?

  Thank you
  Andy

  Hi Andy -.

  Have you tried to have the config in the following way:

   authentication order mab dot1x authentication priority dot1x mab

  This "order" will tell the switchport always start with mab , but the keyword 'priority' will allow the switchport to accept the authentications of dot1x to dot1x devices.

  For more information see this link:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/iOS-NX-OS-software/identity-based-networking-service/application_note_c27-573287.html

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• View 7, Identity Manager 2.6 and Windows authentication, and whether or not real SSO is required for Kerberos

  I am trying to configure our environment so that users can open the Identity Manager web page and be automatically authenticated via their currently logged on credentials of domain.  I activated the Windows authentication and configured Kerberos in Identity Manager.  However, when you select a pool of offices a command prompt is received always ask the user password.  I read https://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US & cmd = displayKC & externalId = 2143567 and understand that maybe expected behavior.  True SSO would solve this problem?  I read that true SSO supports Kerberos.  Is there another way?  The general objective is to allow the user to log on to Windows and be able to access the office pools and applications through identity web page Manager uninvited credentials again.

  I just wanted to know all that true SSO did indeed me reach my goal.

• packages and custom DB for authentication and authorization tables

  I would like to build custom for my APEX 4.1 application authentication.
  I need only a few basic actions and features.
  My idea:
  on these tables the tables USER, ROLES, the USER_ROLES and some package of action and pages (create user, grant the role, authenticate, change password, activate/deactivate the account etc...)
  
  Before starting to write this litle "authentication framework", that I would like to ask you if you know existing solutions.
  
  I would use some existing framework, checked the solution and save time :-)
  
  Thanks for some tips...

  No. I have not found an existing solution. I have developed my own simple solution for authentication and authorization.

  I recommend you do the same thing.

• authentication and authorization

  Hello
  
  We currently lack of several Oracle databases in 2 separate servers - with APEX installed in each database. About authentication (authorization) and we have created a pattern 'user' for each of these databases, then one or more tables for requests for authorization under the table "user". In each of these tables in different databases user, we have a single column to store the name of each user Oracle database account, also 2 columns (username and hashed password) and another column to record his Microsoft Active Directory account name for custom authentication. In this way, different applications using the same schema can use a different way to the authentication method.
  
  The problem is that, for different databases, we had to create at least a 'user' table or the schema for each database because there are a lot of other tables that refer to the PERS_PK. Is an elegant solution for implementing a solution of a store for the repository of user? Again, we must not only authentication and authorization, we also have tables in the different schema and different databases that refer to these PERS_PK.
  
  Thank you.
  Andy

  Hello Andy,

  That is right. As previously mentioned, a FK works only with objects that are located in the same database instance.
  Regarding option 2, bi-directional updates are usually difficult to manage. If you can't make it master / slave somehow, you better use the first option.

  -Udo

• Urgent - Custom authentication and authorization for the application of the ADF

  Hi friends,
  
  Custom implementation for authentication and authorization for the application of the ADF
  
  My project to use the OID , authentication and authorization, we will need to support both OAM and DB tables ( according to the preferences of the client during the installation ).
  
  I am new to this and do not have a clue about the same.
  
  Please guide me how to set up both in JDeveloper 11 g + ADF
  
  Thanks in advance.

  The answers you got up to present every point in the right direction. ADF security see the authentication of WLS, even for business authorization with respect to user roles defined on the WLS server. During the deployment, ADF security defined application roles are mapped to the user enterprise groups

  Application developed using Jdeveloper ADF +.

  This would use WLS for authentication

  Users of authentication - LDAP (OID) - are stored in LDAP

  Use the OID authentication provider in WLS

  Authorization - OAM or database (authorization details are stored in the DB or OAM tables)

  You can't allow users without authentication. If you need create authentication providers additional if they exist for OAM and RDBMS (there is a supplier of existing RDBMA, that you can use to identify users and to assign membership user groups). Then, you set the optional flag so that when authentication fails for additional providers you can always start the application.

  When running Admin users - create users from roles to create and assign permission privileges to the role (for pages and workflows)
  assign (or remove) the roles to/to leave users.

  ADF security uses JAAS to permissions that you can change using Enterprise Manager when running. Permissions are granted to the application roles and application roles are granted to business roles that which then has users become members of the. If you want to change the status of user account, then you don't do this the ADF or EM, but use a direct access to the provider of the user (for example, access OID, RDBMS access etc.) There is no unified administration API available that would allow you to do this via WLS (which uses OPSS).

  If your question is in the context of the ADF, the documentation, with that you should follow is OPSS and WLS authentication providers.

  Frank

• The issue of anonymous authentication and SSO

  Hello
  We have authentication sso as well as anonymous authentication through the same webgate.
  If we change the session time-out setting, which will affect anonymous authentication also?
  
  What is the difference between sso and anonymous authentication session authentication
  mechanism of recovery?
  
  Does obssocookie behavior differs in both cases? Thank you

  The webgate applies the "timing" session on the ObSSOCookie in the same way regardless of the schema used to create the cookie.

  The difference is that, when an anon session expires, the next request on a protected anon resource will result in a new success, anon of authentication and a new ObSSOCookie without the user knowing anything about this activity. (Look at the plugins listed in this scheme to see how it works with a step of mapping of unique identifying information).

  Probably by "sso" you a reference to an another authentication scheme that makes more mapping of credentials just, where it probably prompts for credentials when the next resource protected by this scheme is requested.

  Therefore, the configuration of the system that affects the behavior of challenge.

  Mark