Adblock more popup addon 0.9.1 slows down navigation

Similar Questions

• can software spies, junkware slow down the computer. the same as I ask for Add-ons!

  Hello

  1 can spyware, adware or junkware slow down the computer?

  2-can we some add-ons slow open IE?

  Thank you

  Johan

  Hello

  1 Yes, all forms of malicious and unwanted stuff such as spyware, malware, junkware, etc. can slow down your system based on what they have been coded for it.

  2. According to the addon, Yes, it can slow down your system. Also, a large collection of addons installed and running will also slow down your system.

  Kind regards

  Patrick

• If I copy a symbol several times, it will slow down the animation?

  Maybe this is a stupid question.

  I have a very simple symbol playing in my animation. It s a little red dot that changes size from 100% to 50% and then repeats.

  I copied (no duplicate of symbols pannel) this symbolt several times in animation and plan to copy loads more, maybe hundreds. This will slow down the animation, or all points working through this first original symbol?

  Let me add a clarification. If you duplicate a symbol in the control panel of the elements when you change something in one of them, this change also occurs in the other. Here are the instances of the same symbol. If you duplicate a symbol in the library, and then you change something in one, it will not affect the other. You have created a new symbol. You have now 2 distinct symbols.

• Installed Adblock more get but still ads... What now?

  It is said that Adblock Plus has been installed correctly, but I still have a lot of ads. Very annoying - is considering the switch back to my previous browser as at least the adblock worked.

  Adblock more {web link}
  Blocks annoying video ads on YouTube, Facebook ads, banners
  and much more. Adblock Plus blocks all the annoying ads, and
  supports Web sites by blocking is not discrete (configurable) default ads.

  Pop-up Addon Adblock more {web link}
  Adblock Plus pop-up Addon - extends the functionality of blocking of the
  Adblock Plus for those annoying windows pop up that opens on the mouse
  clicks and other actions of the user.

  Forum; Homepage of Adblock Plus {web link}

• The adblock more icon does not appear on my toolbar

  The announcement

  Follow the instructions here to open the Customize toolbar : https://support.mozilla.org/kb/customize-firefox-controls-buttons-and-toolbars#w_how-do-i-customize-or-rearrange-toolbar-items

  If the Adblock Plus icon in the list, you can drag it to your toolbar.

  If it is not shown, try to go to the view menu and clicking on toolbars > toolbar add-on. See if the Adblock Plus icon on the toolbar that appears. (The instructions allowing to drag the icon to a different toolbar are in the article I linked to).

  If the Adblock Plus icon is not shown, try to re - install Adblock more than https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/adblock-plus/.

• I have install the module "adblock more ' on my android furefox browser, but not block, he adds. What can I do?

  I have install the module "adblock more ' on my android furefox browser, but not block, he adds. What can I do? Please help me quickly.

  You should contact the https://adblockplus.org/forum/ extension

• Since I updated to Firefox (v.21), adblock more disappears when I close firefox. I need to download and re-install. How can I install it permanently?

  It was working fine before, but since I upgraded to Firefox adblock 21 more is deleted when I close Firefox. It shows in my modules (by extension) when I set it up, but disappear when I close firefox and re - open.

  Thank you fredmcd. I have reset firefox, reinstalled adblock more and it works fine now.

• my pc slows down whenever I want to play a game. has got more ram czec and new nvidia card don't know what else to do. can you help me?

  my computer slows down whenever I want to play a game. GRIP more memory ram and a new nvidia card.dont not know what else to do. can you help me? game comes on and goes back to the desktop wallpaper.

  What games do you play?

  the 3200 + is OOOOLLD and you would be difficult to run whatever be done in recent years at all

  and you get drivers like that who already have your computer or MB, realtek can be obtained from the realtek site

  Since you don't list the exact model of each card, we cannot say whether you are running a GF2 MX or what

  and uninstall the nvidia cp stuff, then run http://www.guru3d.com/category/driversweeper/ to clear what is not respected

• My Vista crashed and I've switched back to XP. Now I have 1mil more old files compressed that I can't get rid of and it slows down the computer. How can I get rid of these files

  My Vista crashed and I've switched back to XP. Now I have 1mil more old files compressed that I can't get rid of and it slows down the computer. How can I get rid of these files.

  Hello

  1 are. what type of files?
  2. when they are stored?

  3. What is the size of these compressed files?

  Try to perform the clean boot on the computer and check if that helps.

  Reference:
  How to configure Windows XP to start in a "clean boot" State
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/310353

  See the bottom of the articles that might help you resolve this problem.
  How to make a computer faster: 6 ways to speed up your PC
  http://www.Microsoft.com/atwork/maintenance/speed.aspx
  Slow PC? Optimize your computer for peak performance
  http://www.Microsoft.com/athome/Setup/optimize.aspx

• starts to slow down and there is a delay of approximately 15 seconds or more before he realized my statement through my mouse

  I have laptop with system 'vista basic' which works fine most of the time, but after that, I was on it for maybe 10 minutes, that it starts to slow down and there is a delay of 15 seconds or more before he realized my statement through my mouse. I ran "defender", indicating no problem.

  I am not a very experienced operator and am reluctant to perform the instructions given by the guides, etc., in which case I have to delete the files, etc. If some can help me in the simplest of terms to help me with my problem?

  Hello pinkyxc,

  Thanks for the return of the response.  I think first to plug in a USB mouse and see if you are able to reproduce this problem.  Did you go to the manufacturer website and download the drivers for your mouse lates?

  If your laptop has built in the diagnosis provided by the manufacturer test?  You get all the errors when this happens?

  In addition, you may attempt to perform a restore of the system to a point prior to the installation of IE 9 and see if this corrects the problem.

  System Restore:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/what-is-system-restore

  Please let us know status.

• Lumetri slows down the encoding of color correction more "obsolete."

  Based on my own informal tests, I notice that Lumetri effects on an element in a sequence slows down the process of encoding significantly compared to the same general objective realized with effects of correction of the so-called color "obsolete". Other messages on the forum seem to confirm this.

  I guess the older "out-of-date" color correction effects are far from obsolete. Looks more Adobe innovates and push this crowd of material premium to their last, Lumetri, but that the older effects are more obsolete than obsolete, probably to be there for a long time... iow, use them as you wish for you will hit all compat issues in the foreseeable future.

  Is that what that sounds right?

  My goal by asking is to better align myself as a user of first... my tendency is to take the final product as user recommendations, but that can be a trap when it is really a big innovative push who sometimes material/performance hits that make it unrealistic for all users.

  I have a portable old 5 year, the Sony Vaio VPCF215FX w/6 GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce GT 540 M, 1 TB SSD.  I am able to do, but I really need to think intelligently avoiding external USB drives, using smart rendering, etc. When I tried an experiment with older color effects, I saw a significant reduction in the encoding time (General of my test described below). For this reason, I'm stepping back and thinking that the push 'use Lumetri' everything is beautiful for those who really need, want, and also have the material that can reasonably be taken in charge, but maybe not for someone like me, at least if I can avoid using older effects and with all the same. I just can't justify Lumetri in some cases where it slows down encoding medium.

  It is not that my hw is unable to use it but when I can use older effects and get a nice discount time coding for my not pro use, seems useful to avoid the Lumetri currently, until the upgrade hw or something. I wanted to just check-in here on the forum because everything above is me in a vacuum, I felt ready to hear some voices from the community on my point of view.

  Oh, my test...

  Create two sequences, each with the same single element from the same ~ 60 second clip of Canon EOS 70 d (ALL-I, 1920 x 1080, 23.976 FPS, MPEG-4 AVC / H.264, VBR in.) Container MOV), where each sequence has the following effects of color...

  Seq1-UsingLumetri uses the following color effects:

  • Lumetri #1 (primary): globally adjust contrast/tone/WB Correction of basic and secondary HSL to affect parts of the installation image.
  • Lumetri #2 (secondary): none other than the Secondary to affect an object moving on tracks with a circular mask.

  Seq2-NonLumetri uses the following color effects:

  • The fast color corrector: adjust overall contrast/tone/WB (identical to what Lumetri No. 1 above is without its Secondary).
  • #1 RGB color corrector: Color Correction secondary only to affect certain parts of the image (the highest Lumetri #1 only secondary HSL what).
  • #2 RGB color corrector: secondary color Correction only affect an object moving on tracks with a circular mask (what does the #2 above Lumetri).

  I coded then everyone if above with such parameters as input media, none made smart (because I want to see encoding time with effects) and out of type, etc. The result was that Seq1-Lumetri took about 225 seconds, while Seq2-NonLumetri took about 150 seconds, about 50% more time when using Lumetri on the same ~ 60 second clip entry.

  Note, part of the reason why I'm here is to ask my question above one, sort of general/summary, but it is also based on my not not having seen a single Lumetri color correction tutorial that describes these nuances... check in shades that seem to be essential for efficient use of the product by someone like me. I want to know about Lumetri, that's fine, but I also really want to know how to use the product together more effectively... to do this, seems to me, should not take account of the effects of color more older 'obsolete '. I want to at least know if there is agreement, or if I could be missing something here.

  Thank you!

  "Legacy" color tools more elderly are simpler "peripheral" in the code if I understand and don't work... especially... but as has been clearly established by colorists, especially if you do anything with the "" range"in the young or 3-way controls, you can get weird and very... results not correct not...

  That said, if you stick to their tools without using the modifiers of the range and not to push things too far, they work for the most part, kind of like what you would expect.

  Thus, on this laptop old of yours, stick to the Legacy tools is probably a good thing. And works very well for you. If you move up to a more recent material, you probably want to look more like the Lumetri Panel.

  Currently, I am working with the help of a mixture of Lumetri for the 'main' ranking, but using 3-way & RGB secondary additional & such.

  Neil

• I thought that the pc has a lot of files unwanted ex slows down the pc in the last cheq; ther have been more than 1,000 falts so if that is the case why a analysis of microsoft found them and fixd them

  my pc is very slow, it has furms there who announced for pc free cleen upward but thay are not free; There it scans shows on a PC ther 1000 falts. but I have the safety of microsoft in effect on my pc; ISS so it effective I have all thise things slow down my pc and if so why hasent microsoft stopt them or found on sound analysis;

  Many of these products are all fear-mongering, especially products registry cleaner that allows to identify errors in call charges so much. These registry errors make little or no difference in performance of your computer. Without discernment of cleaning the registry can cause your computer problems including programs works only or the computer does not start. Registry cleaners don't consider as a panacea for your computer problems. If you have a specific problem, are looking for a specific answer. People in these forums will be happy to help you.

  For Windows XP, I would follow the advice in this article:

  How to make a computer faster: 6 ways to speed up your PC

  who is simple and generally of course. Even in this case, make sure you have a current backup of your valuable data.

  Microsoft Security Essentials is an anti-virus program only - it is not designed to find related errors other than viruses and vulnerabilities on your PC.

• When I open too many windows, Firefox slows down

  I use Firefox for ever and I am currently using Windows 7 64 bit. As far as I know, that nothing has changed on my end, but Firefox started running slowly after opening the windows of. How I usually use the program and have done for years, is to open pages in a lot of different windows and close them as needed. This does usually cause no problems and I can leave the program running for days at a time, works perfectly well.

  Last week however, something changed. Now when Firefox starts up first, it works very well, as expected, but then after a period of time, usually in a day, sometimes within a few hours, it starts sensational "gunked upward." At this point, when I try to load a page in a new window, instead of load instantly, there a second or two, during which I can not move to any other Firefox window, but all other running programs work very well. This State continues and grows slower and slower to load new pages, until I closed and reopened Firefox, then the cycle repeats.

  Again, this is a new situation, my normal behavior would not normally cause this kind of slowdown even after a week or more of continuous service. I ran a control of viruses and malware, without success control on either and other programs are not affected. I tried to restart as well, but the problem came back shortly after. I also turned off most of my modules, including those that have worked well for months or years, and still no change, it slogs always down after some time. My Firefox is also currently up-to-date, of course (27.0.1).

  What is going on?

  OK, I put some time in troubleshooting and think that I thought about it. After going in and out of safe mode several times, I reduced to a problem with Adblock Plus. With him in the distance, I could open a ton of windows, with it on this subject would begin to slow. A quick workaround solution was that if I went in the menu of the Addon whenever he began to slow down and disabled Adblock and transformed then turn it back on, it would reset the downturn, but I went to their own support site and came across people with the same problem solved by picking up a beta version of the addon. Since the installation, I got no problems.

• OSX El Capitan slows down

  My desktop computer Mac seems to slow down.

  I see too many beachballing when apps.

  Even between tabs accuses Safari.

  Here is my EtreCheck report.

  The inability, according to some of RAM is new to me, I had not seen this before.

  I would like to help to get my Mac back to the current.

  EtreCheck version: 2.9.12 (265)

  Report generated 2016-06-29 14:43:13

  Download EtreCheck from https://etrecheck.com

  Time 05:06

  Performance: Below average

  Click the [Support] links to help with non-Apple products.

  Click [details] for more information on this line.

  Problem: Beachballing

  Description:

  Computer is too slow

  Hardware Information: ⓘ

  iMac (21.5 inch, at the end of 2013)

  [Data sheet] - [User Guide] - [warranty & Service]

  iMac - model: iMac14, 3

  1 2.9 GHz Intel Core i5 CPU: 4 strands

  8 GB of RAM expandable - [Instructions]

  BANK 0/DIMM0

  OK 4 GB DDR3 1600 MHz

  BANK 1/DIMM0

  OK 4 GB DDR3 1600 MHz

  Bluetooth: Good - transfer/Airdrop2 taken in charge

  Wireless: unknown

  Video information: ⓘ

  NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M - VRAM: 1024 MB

  iMac, 1920 x 1080

  Software: ⓘ

  OS X El Capitan 10.11.5 (15F34) - since the start time: about 4 days

  Disc information: ⓘ

  HTS541010A9E662 disk HARD APPLE disk0: (1 TB) (rotation)

  EFI (disk0s1) < not mounted >: 210 MB

  iMac HD (disk0s2) /: 999,35 go-go (388,48 free)

  Recovery HD (disk0s3) < not mounted > [recovery]: 650 MB

  USB information: ⓘ

  Apple Inc. BRCM20702 hub.

  Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB host controller.

  Apple Inc. FaceTime HD camera (built-in)

  Reader SuperDrive for MacBook Air Apple Inc..

  Lightning information: ⓘ

  Apple Inc. Thunderbolt_bus.

  Guardian: ⓘ

  Mac App Store and identified developers

  Kernel extensions: ⓘ

  ~/Library/application support/transmission/transmission Disk.app

  com.panic.TransmitDisk.transmitdiskfs [no charge] (4.0.0 - 10.6 SDK - 2014-10-02) [Support]

  Launch system officers: ⓘ

  [loaded] 8 tasks Apple

  [loading] 145 tasks Apple

  [operation] 80 tasks Apple

  [killed] 5 tasks of Apple

  5 killed process lack of RAM

  Launch system demons: ⓘ

  [loaded] 42 tasks Apple

  [loading] 147 tasks Apple

  [operation] 90 tasks Apple

  [killed] 12 tasks Apple

  12 killed process lack of RAM

  Launch demons: ⓘ

  [loading] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist (2016-06-13) [Support]

  User launch officers: ⓘ

  [loading] com.google.keystone.agent.plist (2016-03-01) [Support]

  Items in user login: ⓘ

  iTunesHelper Application (/ Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/MacOS/iTunesHelper.app)

  Application of activity monitor (/ Applications/Utilities/Activity Monitor.app)

  Request for TransmitMenu (/ Applications/Transmit.app/Contents/MacOS/TransmitMenu.app)

  Other applications: ⓘ

  [operation] 2BUA8C4S2C.com.agilebits.onepassword - osx-helper

  [ongoing] com.etresoft.EtreCheck.118112

  [ongoing] com.panic.Transmit.62432

  [ongoing] com.panic.Transmit.TransmitMenu.78112

  [ongoing] JP.co.Canon.cijscannerregister.68832

  [loading] 376 tasks Apple

  [operation] 202 tasks Apple

  [killed] 16 tasks Apple

  Plug-ins Internet: ⓘ

  FlashPlayer - 10.6: 22.0.0.192 - SDK 10.9 (2016-06-24), [Support]

  QuickTime Plugin: 7.7.3 (2016-05-21)

  Flash Player: 22.0.0.192 - SDK 10.9 (2016-06-24), [Support]

  EPPEX plugin: 10.0 (2015-04-10) [Support]

  Default browser: 601 - SDK 10.11 (2016-05-21)

  PepperFlashPlayer: 22.0.0.192 - SDK 10.6 (2016-06-24), [Support]

  iPhotoPhotocast: 7.0 - 10.8 SDK (2013-11-20)

  Safari extensions: ⓘ

  1Password - AgileBits - https://agilebits.com/onepassword (2016-05-21)

  Adblock more - Eyeo GmbH - https://adblockplus.org/ (2016-03-25)

  AdBlock - BetaFish, Inc. - https://getadblock.com (2016-05-21)

  3rd party preference panes: ⓘ

  Flash Player (2016-06-13) [Support]

  Time Machine: ⓘ

  Skip system files: No.

  Mobile backups: OFF

  Automatic backup: YES

  Volumes to back up:

  iMac HD: disc size: 999,35 GB disc used: 610,86 GB

  Destinations:

  LaCie BU iMac [Local]

  Total size: 599,86 GB

  Total number of backups: 36

  An older backup: 04/04/16-17:04

  Last backup: 24/06/16 11:15

  Backup disk size: too small

  599,86 GB backup size < (disc 610,86 GB X 3)

  Data 2 TB [network]

  Total size: 2.00 TB

  Total number of backups: 145

  An older backup: 16/11/13-15:06

  Last backup: 29/06/16 12:30

  Size of backup drive: adequate

  Size of backup 2.00 TB > (disc 610,86 GB X 3)

  Top of page process CPU: ⓘ

  6% WindowServer

  Transmit and 5%

  hidd 1%

  1% kernel_task

  1% fontd

  Top of page process of memory: ⓘ

  1.93 GB com.apple.WebKit.WebContent (9)

  849 MB kernel_task

  Safari of 467 MB

  Cfprefsd (2) 115 MB

  Mds_stores 106 MB

  Virtual memory information: ⓘ

  1. 48 GB of RAM

  6.52 GB used RAM (1.38 GB being cached)

  54 MB used Swap

  Diagnostic information: ⓘ

  June 29, 2016, 14:20:15 ~/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/Dock_2016-06-29-142015_[redacted].crash

  /System/Library/CoreServices/dock.app/Contents/MacOS/dock

  26 June 2016, 17:34:04 ~/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/PhotoStreamAgent_2016-06-26-173404_[redacted]. Crash

  com Apple.photostream - agent - /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/Library/LoginItems/PhotoStreamAgent.app/Conte nts/MacOS/PhotoStreamAgent

  What I propose to do this is

  Stop

  Remove all external devices except the keyboard and mouse

  Restart in safe mode

  Try safe mode if your Mac does not end commissioning - Apple Support

  and test the system

  If the system seems to behave then restart normally and test devices external one

  If you check the integrity of your hard drive using disk utility and run diagnostics on your hardware

  Using Apple Hardware Test - Apple Support

• How do I disable Adobe Flash - too many sites have Flash ads that slow down the browser unless an analysis.

  Some pages contain 3, 4, 5 or more adobe flash ads running at the same time, which slows down the browser a lot. Then, if you happen to have several tabs open, the browser is dragging virtually interrupted and many times is not responding at all.

  I would like to be able to choose whether or not a page can run flash content - not it be something that works all the time for each page, with the only option being to kill the plugincontainer process in taskmanager - who kills even the Adobe Flash elements you can watch; like a youtube video.

  Why is there not a way to disable Adobe Flash in the browser? I have updated Firefox and Adobe Flash, but nowhere is there at - it an option to turn on or off according to your needs.

  A control can be added to the Internet Options that you can set to have a page request before it is allowed to run the Flash content? Having that kind of control would GREATLY increase the pleasure of sailing on several pages.

  Any information on how to do it, would be appreciated.

  Hello, this is already possible in firefox: go to firefox/tools > addons > plugins and shockwave flash to Activategame. then the plugin will be disabled by default but can be enabled on a site-by-site basis.