block based query clause

Similar Questions

• Block based on the stored procedure cannot modify Default_where clause

  Hi all

  I tried to create a block based on the stored procedure that it works very well with the result set for the refcursor. But if I need to add filters on the block using where clause in the palette of goods or

  using the property block set in where clause, it does not error but does not review filters .

  tried everything to you please let me know. This is a restriction whereby we can set filters on the block when we create the block based on the stored procedure.

  Thank you

  Check in Form Builder Help:

  Creating a block of data from a procedure that uses a ref cursor

  ... You can't pass a WHERE or ORDER BY clause clause in a stored procedure.

  But you can send your WHERE condition using the query Source Arguments.

  If the procedure is on the side of the database (not in the forms module), ensure that the procedure is not vulnerable to injection of SQL code.

  Kind regards

  Zlatko

• Query clause ignores to export records

  Hi all;

  I am trying to export a few records from table but query clause the customer the throwing error.

  SCOTT > customer desc

  Name                                      Null?    Type

  ----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------

  NUMBER OF CUST_ID

  CUST_NAME VARCHAR2 (15)

  VARCHAR2 (15) REGION

  NUMBER OF CUST_CREDIT_LIMIT

  $ expdp System/Manager dumpfile = dp:1.dmp tables = scott.customers query = scott. "CUSTOMERS:" where exists (select cust_id from CUSTOMERS c where cust_credit_limit > 12400 and ku$ .cust_id = c.sust_id) "" reuse_dumpfiles = yes

  Export: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production on Fri Aug 7 17:11:32 2015

  Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle and/or its affiliates.  All rights reserved.

  Connected to: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production

  With partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options

  Start "SYSTEM". "" SYS_EXPORT_TABLE_01 ": System / * dumpfile = dp:1.dmp tables = scott.customers query = scott. CUSTOMERS: "where exists (select cust_id from CUSTOMERS c where cust_credit_limit > 12400 and ku$ .cust_id = c.sust_id)" reuse_dumpfiles = yes "

  Current estimation using BLOCKS method...

  Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA

  Total estimation using BLOCKS method: 64 KB

  Object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE processing

  ORA-31693: Table object data 'SCOTT '. "' CUSTOMERS ' could not load/unload and being ignored because of the error:

  ORA-00942: table or view does not exist

  Main table 'SYSTEM '. "" SYS_EXPORT_TABLE_01 "properly load/unloaded

  ******************************************************************************

  Empty the file system set. SYS_EXPORT_TABLE_01 is:

  /U01/DataPump/1.dmp

  Work 'SYSTEM '. "" SYS_EXPORT_TABLE_01 "completed with error (s 1) at 17:11:50

  Hello

  I think the problem is that you run the job as system by default, all object references are to the system, you need to change

  $ expdp System/Manager dumpfile = dp:1.dmp tables = scott.customers query = scott. "CUSTOMERS:" where exists (select cust_id from CUSTOMERS c where cust_credit_limit > 12400 and ku$ .cust_id = c.sust_id) "" reuse_dumpfiles = yes

  TO

  $ expdp System/Manager dumpfile = dp:1.dmp tables = scott.customers query = scott. "CUSTOMERS:" where exists (select cust_id scott. CUSTOMER c where cust_credit_limit > 12400 and ku$ .cust_id = c.sust_id) "" reuse_dumpfiles = yes

  I also recommend that you use one parfile to avoid problems of interpretation of the characters by the shell

  See you soon,.

  Rich

• IDS sensor blocking based on received syslog denied ACL messages.

  Hi / Help

  How to set up the sensor 4230 (from the CSPM) to receive and generate alarms (and block) syslog messages send a Cisco router when an ACL denied is detected. For example, how the sensor generates an alarm (and block) based on a like this syslog message:

  % S 6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 120 denied tcp 1.1.1.1 (80)-> 2.2.2.2 (1031)

  I would be grateful if you could explain/describe the solution in detail.

  In particular how the sensor to interpret the text of syslog and how he 'read' what to block.

  What is the correct "text syntax" syslog to send before the sensor 'understand' and do the blocking.

  Thank you.

  Gert Schaarup

  The following link shows how to configure by IDM on the sensor itself.

  You will need to do the same steps using CSPM:

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/iaabu/csids/csids8/13876_01.htm#xtocid35

  When an ACL is created the user can put a keyword "journal" at the end of a line to refuse to have a message from sylog created when this line refuses a package. Syslogs are sent to the sensor router (router must be configured to di it). For ACL syslog messages have a specific format that the sensor has been coded to identify. In this format, the IP is in a specific location. So if the sensor is configured correctly, then the sensor will create an alarm for this acl deny syslog message.

  NOTE: The alarm is for that fact that the sensor has received an acl deny syslog message from the router. The acl who refused the package might have been created by the user or created sensor.

  NOTE2: The alarm would be an acl that has already been created, it blocks the alarm would generate a new acl to block address that is already blocked. So it blocks these alarms is not common practice.

• JDeveloper does not support the SQL expert, cannot add query clause to view link

  For developers who can know:
  
  I use JDeveloper 10.1.3.4 and I have two tables, we're STUDENTS, the other is the PRICE, with a one-to-many relationship (a student may have several awards), and ID is the foreign key:
  

  STUDENTS
  ------------------------
  ID    NAME    DOB
  ------------------------
  9999  JOHN    01/02/1990
     |  
     |  
     |  
     |           AWARDS
     |           ------------------------
     |           ID      DESC      AMOUNT
     |           ------------------------
     ----------- 9999    PELL      500
                 9999    PERKINS   800
                 9999    LOAN      900

  In the application, when a student (9999, JOHN) connects, the information above is displayed. I need to add up all the awards for the student and to display not only the elements of price, but also the total amount of all awards. To do this, I created another object to view named TotalAwards in the object entity the price just to get the total amount. The SQL code of the VO's
  

  SELECT SUM(Awards.AMOUNT) AS TOTAL
  FROM AWARDS Awards

  Then, a link is created between the students and the TotalAwards, and use of the new link to the view is added to the application module. TotalAwards is now available in the data control palette to be drag-and - drop to pages.
  
  Problem occurs when the application is invoked. An error is caught before the application can begin. The error message indicates that "the ends or the link view do not specify an attribute.
  
  It seems that the TOTAL 'SUM (Awards.AMOUNT) AS TOTAL' is not recognized as an attribute. I have reviewed the query clause in the display link to see if it is there, such as:
  

           Attribute        Bind Variable
           ------------     --------------
           Students.ID      :Bind_Id
  
  
  WHEHE    :Bind_Id = Awards.ID

  There is no such clause in the query clause page. And I can not add a no more, because the page is grayed out and disabled. I think maybe it's for the same reason: TOTAL is not recognized as an attribute of the price.
  
  How to get around the problem? Or are there other ways to summarize the total amount and view it in the browser?
  
  Thank you very much for help!
  
  
  Newman

  Hello

  Here you have a solution for the TOTAL:
  http://www.freewebalbum.com/blogs/faces/bjanko/blogs.jsp?blog=bjanko20070725180020

  Kind regards

  Branislav

• How to query the master block based on one of the values of the detail block

  Hello
  In the form of version 6i, I have a field in data block which is not defined as a database element. I use this field to store a block of retail value. If I want to ask the form using this field (which represents one of the values of retail block), how should I do this? Pointers?
  
  TIA,

  Yes, as Ammad10786 says, the ID's I mentioned are just placeholders for your real values. And done MASTERBLOCKID refers to columns in the masterblock which is the primary key or the join condition to the retail block.

• Fill called block based on the criteria of the previous block

  I have a form where the query is based on the zip code provided. I have a button in block has that calls another block b to display all records with this particular zip code. I want to display on the block b to display only the records for the specified zip code. Please help and tell me how to make this happen?

  -In the property WHERE-Clause of block b, enter:
  : BLOCK_A.ZIP_CODE

  -Put a button next to the postcode of the block has
  in the WHEN BUTTON PRESSED trigger, enter:
  GO_BLOCK ("BLOCK B");
  EXECUTE_QUERY;

  Another option would be to use a relationship between the two blocs.

• Query clause

  Hello

  I use this query in a from clause

  SELECT PM.PATIENT_FILE_NO,
         PE.EPISODE_NO,
         DECODE(CURRENT_LANG_P_S,
                'P',
                PATIENT_NAME_P || ' ' || PATIENT_NAME_2_P || ' ' ||
                PATIENT_NAME_3_P || ' ' || PATIENT_NAME_F_P,
                PATIENT_NAME_S || ' ' || PATIENT_NAME_2_S || ' ' ||
                PATIENT_NAME_3_S || ' ' || PATIENT_NAME_F_S) PATIENT_NAME,
         PE.START_DATE,
         PE.END_DATE,
         EXSYS.GET_AGE(PM.DATE_OF_BIRTH) AGE,
         CODES_PKG.GET_DESCRIPTION(PM.GENDER, 103) GENDER,
         PE.ATTENDANCE_TYPE,
         PATIENT_CATEGORY
    FROM RC_PATIENTS PM, RC_PATIENT_EPISODES PE
   WHERE PM.PATIENT_FILE_NO = PE.PATIENT_FILE_NO
     AND PE.STATUS != 'C'
  
  

  The query works in "pl/sql Developer", but when I run the form I had 'query caused no records to retrieve.

  -I wrote

  go_block ('block_name');

  execute_query;

  in a trigger w-n-f-i

  -J' have elements compatible with the number and names of the collected columns of the query, but I have more elements in the same block

  ??

  I found it, thanks

  There are certain triggers prevent execution of code

  Thank you

• BLOCK based ON PROCEDURES in the FORMS

  I'm looking to create a stored procedure-based forms (10 gr 2) block and I am unable to get all records to display in the form after the interrogation.
  
  So far, I have:
  
  1) created a package that defines a Ref Cursor
  (2) created a procedure in this package that returns the ref cursor. The package has 2 arguments: the first is the ref cursor, defined as in OUT. The second is a parameter used in the SELECTION that fills the ref cursor.
  (3) only tested the procedure by writing a routine of PL/SQL separated and proved that the procedure works and returns the expected values.
  (4) using the wizard block, I created the forms block according to the procedure.
  (5) define the QUERY DATA SOURCE ARGUMENTS to provide the second argument required for the procedure. The argument is hardcoded to the same value I used during the test in step 3.
  
  When I run the form, and run the query in the menu (QUERY-> EXECUTE), absolutely nothing happens.
  
  Where should I start to solve this problem?
  
  Thank you

  Have you tried the forum search? a block on the stored database procedure

• Master detail form: block details query by description field

  Hello
  
  I have a form master detail where detail block has LOV by querying the master block, the block of retail is filled with the values of description not code values in the secondary table which I am able to do using Post-requete trigger on block of retail.
  
  When go to mode query in detail block and enter the description and the query I get not all records. How to do the query mode works by description
  
  Help, please
  
  Thank you

  Yes... you have to...

  ((table_col_desc comme: m_desc ou: m_desc est null))
  and (as table_col_desc: m_desc_1 or: m_desc_1 is null)
  and (as table_col_desc: m_desc_2 or: m_desc_2 is null)
  )

  or include the clause to exist...

  Guess it works for you... Post the result

  Published by: Dora on December 15, 2009 08:25

• block based on two tables

  Hello
  
  There are three blocks: block 1 is based on two tables Table1 and Table2 block 2 is based on table 3.
  Block 1 includes the fields: when enter query for Sku: 123, then it should show more results.

  Sku       : 123       Price  : $100        Qty : 10   (Primary)
  Sub Sku   : 345       Price  : $110        Qty : 8   (Level 1)
  Sub Sku   : 456       Price  : $90         Qty : 12 (Level 2)

  If primary Sku is not available then substitute with level 1 and if level 1 is out of stock then replaced by level 2.
  Data of table 1:

  Client Sku       Sub_Sku    Level
  20     123        345         1
  20     123        456         2

  Data in table 2:

  Client    Sku     Price     Qty
  20        123      100       10
  20        345      110        8
  20        456      90        12

  I created the database based on the Table1 block and Table2.The problem I have is
  How to view price information and amounts Sku1 Sub and Sub Sku2. I intend to use the drop down menu to
  levels 1 and 2. When level 1 is selected, it will display all levels 1infor and so on.
  
  Thank you very much in advance
  Sandy
  
  Published by: sandy09 on August 13, 2009 12:42

  What is the difference between the block and block2. I thought that all the information you see comes from table 2?

• Connect By hierarchical query clause-

  Hello
  
  I wrote a query using the Connect By clause to generate the table data structure tree with appropriate levels.
  
  But given could not correct as there may be data that did the trick. As Table1 is parent from table 2 and table 2 is parent from table 3 and table 3 is again Parent from table 1. If these incorrect data then I get error Oracle "ORA-01436: CONNECT loop in the user data" which is correct.
  
  What I need is, whenever this error message is triggered I give my own error instead of this Oracle error message in the SQL statement. Please note that I do not use any PLSQL block, I have just one SQL statement. Appreciate any help on this topic. Thank you.

  Hello

  Outside of PL/SQL, I don't know anyway to substitute your own error messages for those that oracle provides.

  In Oracle 10 (and more), you can write a query using the CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE pseudo-column. Using CONNECTION BY NOCYCLE, the query will never actually throw the error ORA-01436, but you can get it to display your message in the case there, you not used CONNECT BY NOCYCLE.

  Here's how:
  Equip your actual query, CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE, the WITH clause.
  Get this subquery (CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE) MAX. We'll call this max_cbi.
  Do a UNION ALL of two pins:
  (1) selects everything (except, pehaps, CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE), subquery, WHERE max_cbi = 0
  (2) allows you to select your 'error message' double, WHERE max_cbi = 1.

  Published by: Frank Kulash, November 26, 2008 14:09

• How to show total for an Object(read only, not based on entity) view based query

  Hi Experts,

  JDEV version 12.1.3.0

  I want to show the total of column salary for reading only VO (not based on the entity, but the query based).

  The readonlyVO has some display criteria to display the data. So the total should appear only for values, I see in the user interface.

  Thank you

  Roy

  Looks like JDEV problem which was not allowing me to add the transition attribute. After the reboot of jdev im able to add the transition attribute.

• Rewriting query clause error

  Hi all;
  
  I did not finish the rewrite of the query (M.view) clause, trying to activate I get the error message
  and I asked this question "https://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=2543789".
  Question incorrectly displayed data communication model. -If this isn't a duplicate thread.
  
  Please answer me what was missing here?
  
  

  SQL > alter system set query_rewrite_enabled = 'TRUE' scope = SPFILE;

  SQL > grant query rewrite in *;
  Grant succeeded.

  conn xxx/xxxx@xxxxxx
  1 SQL > ALTER SESSION SET OPTIMIZER_MODE = FIRST_ROWS.
  Altered session.

  2 SQL > alter session set query_rewrite_enabled = true;
  Altered session.

  3 SQL > execute dbms_stats.gather_table_stats ('rose', 'mv1');
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

  4 SQL > exec dbms_mview.explain_rewrite ("select * sales ', but 'MV1'");
  BEGIN dbms_mview.explain_rewrite ("select from sales, 'MV1'"); END; *
  * ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-30380: REWRITE_TABLE does not exist
  ORA-06512: at "SYS." DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 3085
  ORA-06512: at "SYS." DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 3206
  ORA-06512: at line 1

  thanks in advance...

  Hello

  Run utlxrw.sql to create the table.

  concerning

• [10g] need help with order by hierarchical query clause

  I have the following data samples:

  CREATE TABLE     bill_test1
  (     parent_part     CHAR(25)
  ,     child_part     CHAR(25)
  ,     line_nbr     NUMBER(5)
  ,     qty_per          NUMBER(9,5)
  );
  
  INSERT INTO bill_test1 VALUES ('ABC-1','ABC-10',100,1);
  INSERT INTO bill_test1 VALUES ('ABC-1','ABC-20',200,2);
  INSERT INTO bill_test1 VALUES ('ABC-1','ABC-30',300,3);
  INSERT INTO bill_test1 VALUES ('ABC-1','HARDWARE-1',401,10);
  INSERT INTO bill_test1 VALUES ('ABC-1','HARDWARE-2',402,5);
  INSERT INTO bill_test1 VALUES ('ABC-10','ABC-155',100,2);
  INSERT INTO bill_test1 VALUES ('ABC-10','HARDWARE-1',200,1);
  INSERT INTO bill_test1 VALUES ('ABC-155','RAW-2',100,4.8);
  INSERT INTO bill_test1 VALUES ('ABC-155','HARDWARE-3',200,3);
  INSERT INTO bill_test1 VALUES ('ABC-20','RAW-1',100,10.2);
  INSERT INTO bill_test1 VALUES ('ABC-30','RAW-3',100,3);

  And the following query gives me exactly what I want, in the order I want. However, I wonder if there is a way to get this order without creating the column SEQ, given that I don't need in my results

  SELECT     part_nbr
  ,     parent_part
  ,     child_part
  FROM     (
       SELECT     CONNECT_BY_ROOT b.parent_part                         AS part_nbr
       ,     b.parent_part
       ,     b.child_part
       ,     SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(b.line_nbr,' ')                    AS seq
       FROM     bill_test1 b
       ,     dual
       CONNECT BY     parent_part     = PRIOR child_part
       )
  WHERE          part_nbr     = 'ABC-1'
  ORDER BY     seq
  ;
  
  Results of above query, except with SEQ included in SELECT (just to show what I'm sorting off of):
  PART_NBR                     PARENT_PART                  CHILD_PART                   SEQ
  ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- -----------------
  ABC-1                        ABC-1                        ABC-10                        100
  ABC-1                        ABC-10                       ABC-155                       100 100
  ABC-1                        ABC-155                      RAW-2                         100 100 100
  ABC-1                        ABC-155                      HARDWARE-3                    100 100 200
  ABC-1                        ABC-10                       HARDWARE-1                    100 200
  ABC-1                        ABC-1                        ABC-20                        200
  ABC-1                        ABC-20                       RAW-1                         200 100
  ABC-1                        ABC-1                        ABC-30                        300
  ABC-1                        ABC-30                       RAW-3                         300 100
  ABC-1                        ABC-1                        HARDWARE-1                    401
  ABC-1                        ABC-1                        HARDWARE-2                    402

  Hello

  As long as there is that a single root, brothers and SŒURS of ORDER BY, you say, but you can not do in a subquery (well, you can, but usually there is no interest in a subquery). If the CONNECT BY in a subquery, there is no guarantee that the main request will preserve the hierarchical order which provides the subquery.

  The query you posted does not require a query of Tahina, so you can say:

  SELECT     CONNECT_BY_ROOT b.parent_part                         AS part_nbr
  ,     b.parent_part
  ,     b.child_part
  --,     SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(b.line_nbr,' ')                    AS seq
  FROM     bill_test1 b
  WHERE          CONNECT_BY_ROOT b.parent_part     = 'ABC-1'
  CONNECT BY     parent_part     = PRIOR child_part
  ORDER SIBLINGS BY     b.line_nbr
  ;
  

  I said the query you posted does not require a subquery. It also does not require double, so I guess that what you posted is a simplification of what you are really doing, and that could have a subquery. In particular, if you want to GROUP BY part_nbr, you need the subquery. We can use CONNECT_BY_ROOT expression in the WHERE clause (or, come to think of it, use a START WITH clause instead WHERE), but, for some reason, we cannot use CONNECT_BY_ROOT in a clause GROUP BY; We need to calculate CONNECT_BY_ROOT in a subquery, give it a name (like part_nbr) and Super GROUP OF this column in a query.

  This requires that there is that one node root. ORDER OF brothers and SŒURS means just that: children of a common parent will appear in the order, but the root nodes, which have no parents, may not be in order.

  Here's what I meant by using START WITH place WHERE:

  SELECT     CONNECT_BY_ROOT b.parent_part                         AS part_nbr
  ,     b.parent_part
  ,     b.child_part
  --,     SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(b.line_nbr,' ')                    AS seq
  FROM     bill_test1 b
  START WITH     b.parent_part     = 'ABC-1'
  CONNECT BY     parent_part     = PRIOR child_part
  ORDER SIBLINGS BY     b.line_nbr
  ;
  

  This should be much more effective, because it reduces the results before waste you your time by getting their descendants.
  With the help of a clause START WITH here is analogous to me sending you an email, saying "come to a meeting one my office at 03:00."
  By using a WHERE clause here is similar by sending me an e-mail to all members of society, saying: "come to a meeting one my office at 3:00" and then, as people get here, tell everyone except you could go back.

  Brothers and SŒURS ORDER BY was introduced in Oracle 9.

  Published by: Frank Kulash, December 9, 2010 14:39
  Added version with the START WITH clause