Change of shape joining multi tables SQL...

Similar Questions

• SELECT - INNER JOIN / multi-table question

  I have a few pages where I can:
  register a new user
  Open as this user which brings me to a home page. from there I can go to 'my page' users where I can see their fine of the initial registry data. I have a link here where I can go to add to their additional profile data that I didn't want to bore in the original registration.
  
  It perfect all worked with the original test data, I've created in the database.
  
  After that I added the additional tables needed to feed the profile further I ran into trouble. I could create a new user, see in the database is fine. I see them on the homepage with their information through the Recordset. However when I'd go to their 'my page' none of their information would be fill and go to extra profile update page haven't fired a no records found message.
  
  Finally, I realized that the reason for this is because the SELECT statement is waiting for the other tables to fill. I filled in the missing data and the query to work. So... Now that I know what is causing the problem I need help to find a solution. Also, I'm still new to find work around me even after 4 days of research and reading messages.
  
  So when a new user registers, I need to be able to display data from the initial registration on the "my page" and get their user_id for profile tables add somehow so that when I go to the add profile page, there is a link.
  
  I don't know if I need to do something in the database or in my query. It there any sense to anyone? I need to create the user_id on other tables during registration of origin occurs? If so, how would I go all this?
  
  Thanks in advance. My INNER JOIN is attached in case it helps.
  
  

  I have a few pages where I can:
  register a new user
  Open as this user which brings me to a home page. from there I can go to 'my page' users where I can see their fine of the initial registry data. I have a link here where I can go to add to their additional profile data that I didn't want to bore in the original registration.

  It perfect all worked with the original test data, I've created in the database.

  After that I added the additional tables needed to feed the profile further I ran into trouble. I could create a new user, see in the database is fine. I see them on the homepage with their information through the Recordset. However when I'd go to their 'my page' none of their information would be fill and go to extra profile update page haven't fired a no records found message.

  Finally, I realized that the reason for this is because the SELECT statement is waiting for the other tables to fill. I filled in the missing data and the query to work. So... Now that I know what is causing the problem I need help to find a solution. Also, I'm still new to find work around me even after 4 days of research and reading messages.

  So when a new user registers, I need to be able to display data from the initial registration on the "my page" and get their user_id for profile tables add somehow so that when I go to the add profile page, there is a link.

  I don't know if I need to do something in the database or in my query. It there any sense to anyone? I need to create the user_id on other tables during registration of origin occurs? If so, how would I go all this?

  Thanks in advance. My INNER JOIN is attached in case it helps.

• SQL +-PROBLEM OF QUERY IN MULTI TABLE

  HAI ALL,
  
  ANY SUGGESTION PLEASE?
  
  SUP: SQL +-PROBLEM OF QUERY IN MULTI TABLE
  
  
  SQL + QUERY DATA:
  -----------
  SELECT PATIENT_NUM, PATIENT_NAME, HMTLY_TEST_NAME, HMTLY_RBC_VALUE,
  
  HMTLY_RBC_NORMAL_VALUE, DLC_TEST_NAME, DLC_POLYMORPHS_VALUE,
  
  PATIENTS_MASTER1 DLC_POLYMORPHS_NORMAL_VALUE, HAEMATOLOGY1,
  
  DIFFERENTIAL_LEUCOCYTE_COUNT1
  WHERE PATIENT_NUM = HMTLY_PATIENT_NUM AND PATIENT_NUM = DLC_PATIENT_NUM AND PATIENT_NUM
  
  = & PATIENT_NUM;
  -----------
  RESULT:
  
  & PATIENT_NUM = 1
  no selected line
  ---------
  & PATIENT_NUM = 2
  no selected line
  ------------
  & PATIENT_NUM = 3
  PATIENT_NUM 3
  
  PATIENT_NAME KKKK
  
  HMTLY_TEST_NAME HEMATOLOGY
  
  HMTLY_RBC_VALUE 4
  4.6 - 6.0 HMTLY_RBC_NORMAL
  
  DLC_TEST_NAME LEUKOCYTE COUNT PREMIUM
  
  DLC_POLYMORPHS_VALUE 60
  
  DLC_POLYMORPHS_NORMAL_VALUE 40-65
  
  -------------
  -------------
  
  REAL WILL BE:
  
  & PATIENT_NUM = 1
  
  PATIENT_NUM 1
  
  PATIENT_NAME BBBB
  
  HMTLY_TEST_NAME HEMATOLOGY
  
  HMTLY_RBC_VALUE 5
  4.6 - 6.0 HMTLY_RBC_NORMAL
  
  -----------
  
  & PATIENT_NUM = 2
  
  PATIENT_NUM 2
  
  PATIENT_NAME GEORGE
  
  DLC_TEST_NAME LEUKOCYTE COUNT PREMIUM
  
  DLC_POLYMORPHS_VALUE 42
  
  DLC_POLYMORPHS_NORMAL_VALUE 40-65
  ---------------
  & PATIENT_NUM = 3
  PATIENT_NUM 3
  
  PATIENT_NAME KKKK
  
  HMTLY_TEST_NAME HEMATOLOGY
  
  HMTLY_RBC_VALUE 4
  4.6 - 6.0 HMTLY_RBC_NORMAL
  
  DLC_TEST_NAME LEUKOCYTE COUNT PREMIUM
  
  DLC_POLYMORPHS_VALUE 60
  
  DLC_POLYMORPHS_NORMAL_VALUE 40-65
  ----------------------------
  
  4 TABLES OF LABORATORY CLINIC FOR DATA ENTRY AND GET REPORT ONLY FOR THE TESTS CARRIED OUT FOR PARTICULAR
  
  PATIENT.
  
  TABLE1:PATIENTS_MASTER1
  COLUMNS: PATIENT_NUM, PATIENT_NAME,
  
  VALUES:
  PATIENT_NUM
  1
  2
  3
  4
  PATIENT_NAME
  BENAMER
  GIROT
  KKKK
  PPPP
  ---------------
  TABLE2:TESTS_MASTER1
  COLUMNS: TEST_NUM, TEST_NAME
  
  VALUES:
  TEST_NUM
  1
  2
  TEST_NAME
  HEMATOLOGY
  DIFFERENTIAL LEUKOCYTE COUNT
  -------------
  
  TABLE3:HAEMATOLOGY1
  COLUMNS:
  HMTLY_NUM, HMTLY_PATIENT_NUM, HMTLY_TEST_NAME, HMTLY_RBC_VALUE, HMTLY_RBC_NORMAL_VALUE
  
  VALUES:
  HMTLY_NUM
  1
  2
  HMTLY_PATIENT_NUM
  1
  3
  MTLY_TEST_NAME
  HEMATOLOGY
  HEMATOLOGY
  HMTLY_RBC_VALUE
  5
  4
  HMTLY_RBC_NORMAL_VALUE
  4.6 - 6.0
  4.6 - 6.0
  ------------
  
  TABLE4:DIFFERENTIAL_LEUCOCYTE_COUNT1
  COLUMNS: DLC_NUM, DLC_PATIENT_NUM, DLC_TEST_NAME, DLC_POLYMORPHS_VALUE, DLC_POLYMORPHS_
  
  NORMAL_VALUE,
  
  VALUES:
  DLC_NUM
  1
  2
  DLC_PATIENT_NUM
  2
  3
  DLC_TEST_NAME
  DIFFERENTIAL LEUKOCYTE COUNT
  DIFFERENTIAL LEUKOCYTE COUNT
  DLC_POLYMORPHS_VALUE
  42
  60
  DLC_POLYMORPHS_NORMAL_VALUE
  40-65
  40-65
  -----------------
  
  
  Thank you
  RCS
  E-mail:[email protected]
  --------

  I think you want an OUTER JOIN

  SELECT PATIENT_NUM, PATIENT_NAME, HMTLY_TEST_NAME, HMTLY_RBC_VALUE,
   HMTLY_RBC_NORMAL_VALUE, DLC_TEST_NAME, DLC_POLYMORPHS_VALUE,
   DLC_POLYMORPHS_NORMAL_VALUE
  FROM PATIENTS_MASTER1, HAEMATOLOGY1,  DIFFERENTIAL_LEUCOCYTE_COUNT1
  WHERE PATIENT_NUM = HMTLY_PATIENT_NUM (+)
  AND PATIENT_NUM = DLC_PATIENT_NUM (+)
  AND PATIENT_NUM = &PATIENT_NUM;
  

  Published by: shoblock on November 5, 2008 12:17
  the outer join brands became stupid emoticons or something. try hard

• SQL database need to change single user for multi user mode.

  Hello

  I have a name of database sql as kumar.

  I changed the mode to multi user in single user mode, but unfortunately I forgot to change the mode.

  So, now I can't able to connect at the base of his error showing as already access that a single user can connect at the same time.

  Please help me solve this problem.

  Concerning

  Kumar

  Hello

  The problem has been resolved.

  Ground:

  We restarted the database and then changed the single-user mode to multi user mode.

  We now have access to the database.

  Thank you

  Kumar

• SQL: JOIN two table also corresponding column NULL how?

  Hello
  
  I'm trying to join two tables which works fine,
  But if there are NULL values, then, JOIN does not.
  I have two tables TEMP_DD AND TEMP_EE, in which two line
  is the column: allocation A_ID,.
  IE: 112 and NULL and I want both my sql output, but how?
  
  I tried under sql as it returns only a single line of 112 and does not return a null row which is a football game.
  
  
  

  SELECT * FROM TEMP_DD
  JOIN TEMP_EE
  ON (TEMP_DD.A_ID = TEMP_EE.A_ID);

  How to remedy this situation?
  
  

  create table TEMP_DD
  (
    A_ID VARCHAR2(3),
    B_ID VARCHAR2(4),
    C_ID VARCHAR2(10)
  );
  
  create table TEMP_EE
  (
    A_ID VARCHAR2(3),
    B_ID VARCHAR2(4),
    C_ID VARCHAR2(10)
  );
  
  insert into TEMP_DD (A_ID, B_ID, C_ID)
  values ('112', '1123', '12345678');
  insert into TEMP_DD (A_ID, B_ID, C_ID)
  values (NULL, '1123', '12345678');
  insert into TEMP_DD (A_ID, B_ID, C_ID)
  values ('212', '1123', '12345678');
  
  
  insert into TEMP_EE (A_ID, B_ID, C_ID)
  values ('112', '1123', '12345678');
  insert into TEMP_EE (A_ID, B_ID, C_ID)
  values (NULL, '1123', '12345678');
  insert into TEMP_EE (A_ID, B_ID, C_ID)
  values ('312', '1123', '12345678');

  OUTPUT
  ---------
  
  "112', ' 1123," "12345678".
  (NULL, ' 1123","12345678 ".

  Hello

  Wrap both sides in an NVL IE. NVL (col1, 'X'), WHERE = NVL(col2,'X').

  See you soon

  Ben

• Outer join complete Multi Table

  What is the syntax to make a full outer join on three tables. All the examples I can find use using the clause, but in my case, the column names are not the same in the three tables

  Hello

  Use IT instead of USE.

  Assuming that all the 3 tables will have a common value in a column (whatever it is called):

  ...
  FROM           table_x  x
  FULL OUTER JOIN      table_y  y     ON     y.idy     = x.idx
  FULL OUTER JOIN      table_z  z     ON     z.idz     = COALESCE (x.idx, y.idy)
  

  When comes the time to join table_z, you won't know which of the previous tables match, so you must use COALESCE to try them all.

  If you need to join several tables in this way, the expression of COALESCE for the nth table will have (n - 1) arguments.

• Joins of tables in the inventory

  Hi all

  Can you please give me the join conditions (request format as where to use an outer join or internal)?

  mtl_material_transactions,

  mtl_system_items_b,

  mtl_parameters

  mtl_item_locations,

  mtl_serial_numbers,

  mtl_lot_numbers

  Here's the sql code.

  We do not have the serial controlled items so I have all the data to validate this sql.

  You need to add a large number of columns in the place where clause change conditions.

  each table has some kind of column field or flag status.

  You can figure that out based on the configuration of your company.

  ======

  Select * from

  mtl_material_transactions mmt,

  MSI mtl_system_items_b,

  mtl_parameters mp,

  mil mtl_item_locations

  mtl_serial_numbers msn,

  mtl_lot_numbers CHF million

  where

  MMT.inventory_item_id = msi.inventory_item_id

  and

  MMT.organization_id = msi.organization_id

  and

  MMT.organization_id = mp.organization_id

  and

  -Outer join MIL incase you don't have parameters of Articles Locators

  MMT.inventory_item_id = mil.inventory_item_Id

  and

  MMT.organization_id = mil.organization_id

  and

  -an outer join on MSN snack items are not control series

  MMT.inventory_item_id = msn.inventory_item_id

  and

  MMT.organization_id = msn.current_organization_id

  and

  -an outer join on mln point snack is not the outer join

  MMT.inventory_item_id = mln.inventory_item_id

  and

  MMT.organization_id = mln.organization_id

  -settings

  and msi.segment1 = «& itemnumber»

  and mmt.organization_id = &org_id;

  =====================

  NOTE: not all run great sql open, it will never be over. Having so many outer joins will not use the index unless you spend in the settings I have used at least.

  all the best.

• BAD RESULTS WITH OUTER JOINS AND TABLES WITH A CHECK CONSTRAINT

  HII All,
  Could any such a me when we encounter this bug? Please help me with a simple example so that I can search for them in my PB.
  
  
  Bug:-8447623
  
  Bug / / Desc: BAD RESULTS WITH OUTER JOINS AND TABLES WITH a CHECK CONSTRAINT
  
  
  I ran the outer joins with check queries constraint 11G 11.1.0.7.0 and 10 g 2, but the result is the same. Need to know the scenario where I will face this bug of your experts and people who have already experienced this bug.
  
  
  Version: -.
  

  SQL> select * from v$version;
  
  BANNER
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
  PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
  CORE    11.1.0.7.0      Production
  TNS for Solaris: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
  NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production

  Why do you not use the description of the bug test case in Metalink (we obviously can't post it here because it would violate the copyright of Metalink)? Your test case is not a candidate for the elimination of the join, so he did not have the bug.

  Have you really read the description of the bug in Metalink rather than just looking at the title of the bug? The bug itself is quite clear that a query plan that involves the elimination of the join is a necessary condition. The title of bug nothing will never tell the whole story.

  If you try to work through a few tens of thousands of bugs in 11.1.0.7, of which many are not published, trying to determine whether your application would be affected by the bug? Wouldn't be order of magnitude easier to upgrade the application to 11.1.0.7 in a test environment and test the application to see what, if anything, breaks? Understand that the vast majority of the problems that people experience during an upgrade are not the result of bugs - they are the result of changes in behaviour documented as changes in query plans. And among those who encounter bugs, a relatively large fraction of the new variety. Even if you have completed the Herculean task of verifying each bug on your code base, which would not significantly easier upgrade. In addition, at the time wherever you actually performed this analysis, Oracle reportedly released 3 or 4 new versions.

  And at this stage would be unwise to consider an upgrade to 11.2?

  Justin

• Join several Tables versioned

  Hello

  We are working on a data warehousing project and wonder how do to join several tables that each are versioned separately (type SCD 2 with a valid and valid to date).

  Because for example, we get our client from a single source of information (id customer, name, etc.) and the information on the rate of customer from another source.  The sources are different, we have the separate tables for them and each of them gets versioned independently.

  Here's my customer table (with its own valid and valuable to the columns).

  ID	Name of the customer	Valid from	Valid until the
  1	CitiBank	1 JANUARY 14	JANUARY 1, 15
  1	New CitiBank	2 JANUARY 15	FEBRUARY 1, 15
  1	Latest CitiBank	2 FEBRUARY 15	APRIL 1, 15

  And similarly the Client side ID and rating information.

  ID	Note	Valid from	Valid until the
  1	Platinum	1 JANUARY 14	FEBRUARY 1, 14
  1	Premium	FEBRUARY 1, 14	1ST MARCH 15

  I want to merge the two tables above and present information at a glance.  I have some difficulty to determine validates the valid columns.

  ID	Name of the customer	Note	Valid from (Calculated)	Valid until the (calculated)
  1	CitiBank	Platinum	1 JANUARY 14	FEBRUARY 1, 14
  1	CitiBank	Premium	FEBRUARY 1, 14	JANUARY 1, 15
  1	New CitiBank	Premium	2 JANUARY 15	FEBRUARY 1, 15
  1	Latest CitiBank	Premium	2 FEBRUARY 15	1ST MARCH 15

  And it's the query I used to get the above result:

  SELECT client. id ,

         customer . name ,

         CRM . level ,

         Greatest (client. vld_fm , crm. vld_fm ),

         Least (client. vld_to , crm. vld_to )

  DE    client client,

         client_rating crm

  OÙ   client. id = crm. id

         AND ( client. vld_fm <= crm. vld_fm

               AND client. vld_fm <= crm. vld_to

               AND client. vld_fm >= crm. vld_fm

               AND client. vld_fm >= crm. vld_to )

          OR ( client. vld_fm BETWEEN crm. vld_fm AND crm. vld_to )

          OR ( client. vld_to BETWEEN crm. vld_fm AND crm. vld_to );

  
  

  
  The problem is we have several data sources (and each with its own versions) and joins become so very very complex.  Is there a better way to write the query?

  Or maybe a better way to design our tables?

  Thanks for your help.

  Anand

  Hello

  you only need ranges that overlap to join.

  Re: How do to sql query in a loop

  Is a simpler way to test if the x_start to x_stop range comes into conflict with the range of y_start to y_stop

  WHERE     x_start <= y_stop AND     y_start <= x_stop
  

  In other words, two overlapping if and only if everyone will start before the other ends one. If this is not obvious (and it was certainly not clear to me when I heard it), then look at it this way: two ranges are not overlapping if and only if one of them starts after the end of the other.

  Concerning

  Marcus

• JOIN the question... Join two tables without omitting lines

  I came across a problem that should be an easy fix (I hope), but I'm having a hard time to come up with a solution.

  Basically I have two tables, one with the actual amounts with the budget. I have to write a sql statement select that joins these tables together and includes all of their lines. I was able to join the tables by using JOIN, LEFT JOIN and RIGHT JOIN, but it always fails the lines I need.

  Below, I have examples of my tables (AMOUNT_TABLE and BUDGET_TABLE). For simplicity, I built the examples to show the same values in the first four columns, with the 5th and 6th columns (SUB_ACCOUNT, AMOUNT, BUDGET) as the only values that are different. My actual tables are not quite that simple, but I don't think it was relavent to this issue.

  AMOUNT_TABLE

  FISCAL_YEAR	PERIOD	ACCT_UNIT	ACCOUNT	SUB_ACCOUNT	AMOUNT
  2013

  111111555555000010020131111115555551000100201311111155555520001002013111111555555300010020131111115555554000100

  BUDGET_TABLE

  FISCAL_YEAR	PERIOD	ACCT_UNIT	ACCOUNT	SUB_ACCOUNT	BUDGET
  2013

  1111115555553000200201311111155555540002002013111111555555500020020131111115555556000200

  Here's what I hope. Note that SUB_ACCOUNTs 0000, 1000, and 2000 show without budget amounts since there is not a corresponding line in the BUDGET_TABLE. And same for SUB_ACCOUNTs 5000 and 6000, they show budgets with no amount because there is not a corresponding line in the AMOUNT_TABLE.

  (exit)

  FISCAL_YEAR	PERIOD	ACCT_UNIT	ACCOUNT	SUB_ACCOUNT	AMOUNT	BUDGET
  2013	1	11111	555555	0000	100	0
  2013	1	11111	555555	1000	100	0
  2013	1	11111	555555	2000	100	0
  2013	1	11111	555555	3000	100	200
  2013	1	11111	555555	4000	100	200
  2013	1	11111	555555	5000	0	200
  2013	1	11111	555555	6000	0	200

  If all goes well, my question is clear. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

  Use the join ANSI - FULL OUTER JOIN syntax:

  with amount_table like)

  Select fiscal_year 2013, 1 period, 11111 acct_unit, 555555, 0000 sub_account, amount 100 of all the double union

  Select 2013,1,11111,555555,1000,100 from all the double union

  Select 2013,1,11111,555555,2000,100 from all the double union

  Select 2013,1,11111,555555,3000,100 from all the double union

  Select double 2013,1,11111,555555,4000,100

  ),

  budget_table like)

  Select 1 time, 11111 acct_unit, account 555555, sub_account 3000, 2013 fiscal_year, budget of 200 Union double all the

  Select 2013,1,11111,555555,4000,200 from all the double union

  Select 2013,1,11111,555555,5000,200 from all the double union

  Select double 2013,1,11111,555555,6000,200

  )

  Select nvl (a.fiscal_year, b.fiscal_year) fiscal_year,

  period of NVL (a.period, b.period),

  NVL (a.acct_unit, b.acct_unit) acct_unit.

  account of NVL (a.Account, b.Account),

  NVL (a.sub_account, b.sub_account) sub_account.

  Amount NVL(a.amount,0),

  NVL(b.budget,0) budget

  of amount_table one

  full join

  budget_table b

  on)

  a.Fiscal_Year = b.fiscal_year

  and

  a.period = b.period

  and

  a.acct_unit = b.acct_unit

  and

  a.Account = b.account

  and

  a.sub_account = b.sub_account

  )

  /

  FISCAL_YEAR PERIOD ACCT_UNIT ACCOUNT SUB_ACCOUNT AMOUNT BUDGET
  ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------
  2013 1 11111 555555 0 100 0
  2013 1 11111 555555 1000 100 0
  2013 1 11111 555555 2000 100 0
  2013 1 11111 555555 3000 100 200
  2013 1 11111 555555 4000 100 200
  2013 1 11111 555555 6000 0 200
  2013 1 11111 555555 5000 0 200

  7 selected lines.

  SQL >

  SY.

• date max with multiple joins of tables

  Looking for expert advice on the use of max (date) with multiple joins of tables. Several people have tried (and failed) - HELP Please!
  
  The goal is to retrieve the most current joined line of NBRJOBS_EFFECTIVE_DATE for each unique NBRJOBS_PIDM. There are several lines by PIDM with various EFFECTIVE_DATEs. The following SQL returns about 1/3 of the files and there are also some multiples.
  
  The keys are PIDM, POSN and suff
  
  Select NBRJOBS. NBRJOBS.*,
  NBRBJOB. NBRBJOB.*
  of POSNCTL. Inner join of NBRBJOB NBRBJOB POSNCTL. NBRJOBS NBRJOBS on (NBRBJOB. NBRBJOB_PIDM = NBRJOBS. NBRJOBS_PIDM) and (NBRBJOB. NBRBJOB_POSN = NBRJOBS. NBRJOBS_POSN) and (NBRBJOB. NBRBJOB_SUFF = NBRJOBS. NBRJOBS_SUFF)
  where NBRJOBS. NBRJOBS_SUFF <>'LS '.
  and NBRBJOB. NBRBJOB_CONTRACT_TYPE = 'P '.
  and NBRJOBS. NBRJOBS_EFFECTIVE_DATE =
  (select Max (NBRJOBS1. NBRJOBS_EFFECTIVE_DATE) as 'EffectDate '.
  of POSNCTL. NBRJOBS NBRJOBS1
  where NBRJOBS1. NBRJOBS_PIDM = NBRJOBS. NBRJOBS_PIDM
  and NBRJOBS1. NBRJOBS_POSN = NBRJOBS. NBRJOBS_POSN
  and NBRJOBS1. NBRJOBS_SUFF = NBRJOBS. NBRJOBS_SUFF
  and NBRJOBS1. NBRJOBS_SUFF <>'LS '.
  and NBRJOBS1. NBRJOBS_EFFECTIVE_DATE < = to_date('2011/11/15','yy/mm/dd'))
  order of NBRJOBS. NBRJOBS_PIDM

  Welcome to the forum!

  We don't know what you are trying to do.
  You want all of the columns in the rows where NBRJOBS_EFFECTIVE_DATE is the date limit before a given date (November 15, 2011 in this example) for all rows in the result set with this NBRJOBS_PIDM? If so, here is one way:

  with         GOT_R_NUM     as
  (
       select       NBRJOBS.NBRJOBS.*,
              NBRBJOB.NBRBJOB.*     -- You may have to give aliases, so that every column has a unique name
       ,       rank () over ( partition by  NBRJOBS.NBRJOBS_PIDM
                                 order by      NBRJOBS.NBRJOBS_EFFECTIVE_DATE     desc
                        )             as R_NUM
       from          POSNCTL.NBRBJOB NBRBJOB
       inner join      POSNCTL.NBRJOBS NBRJOBS       on    (NBRBJOB.NBRBJOB_PIDM = NBRJOBS.NBRJOBS_PIDM)
                                          and      (NBRBJOB.NBRBJOB_POSN = NBRJOBS.NBRJOBS_POSN)
                                    and      (NBRBJOB.NBRBJOB_SUFF = NBRJOBS.NBRJOBS_SUFF)
       where       NBRJOBS.NBRJOBS_SUFF             != 'LS'       -- Is this what you meant?
       and        NBRBJOB.NBRBJOB_CONTRACT_TYPE   ='P'
       and       NBRJOBS.NBRJOBS_EFFECTIVE_DATE  <= to_date ('2011/11/15', 'yyyy/mm/dd')
  )
  select       *     -- Or list all columns except R_NUM
  from       GOT_R_NUM
  where       R_NUM          = 1
  order by  NBRJOBS_PIDM
  ;
  

  Normally this site does not display the <>inequality operator; He thinks it's some kind of beacon.
  Whenever you post on this site, use the other inequality operator (equivalent), *! = *.

  I hope that answers your question.
  If not, post a small example of data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT, only relevant columns instructions) for all the tables involved and the results desired from these data.
  Explain, using specific examples, how you get these results from these data.
  Always tell what version of Oracle you are using.
  You will get better results faster if you always include this information whenever you have a problem.

• Deliver the trigger, multi-table insert logging of errors

  I find that if I try to perform an insert multi-table with logging of errors on a table that has a trigger, then some violations of constraints result in a raised exception being as connected:
  < pre >
  SQL > select * from v version $;
  
  BANNER
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
  PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
  CORE 11.2.0.1.0 Production
  AMT for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
  NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
  
  SQL > create table t1 (primary key of all id ;)
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL > create table t2 (id integer, t1_id integer primary key,
  2 constraint t2_t1_fk foreign key (t1_id) refers to t1);
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL > exec dbms_errlog.create_error_log ("T2");
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  SQL > insert all
  2 in t2 (id, t1_id)
  3 values (x, y)
  4 errors in the journal in err$ _t2 limit unlimited rejection
  5. Select 1 x, 2 double y;
  
  0 rows created.
  
  SQL > create or replace trigger t2_trg
  2 before insert or update on t2
  3 for each line
  4 start
  5 zero;
  6 end;
  5 m
  
  Trigger created.
  
  SQL > insert all
  2 in t2 (id, t1_id)
  3 values (x, y)
  4 errors in the journal in err$ _t2 limit unlimited rejection
  5. Select 1 x, 2 double y;
  Insert all
  *
  ERROR on line 1:
  ORA-02291: integrity constraint (enhanced oil recovery. T2_T1_FK) violated - key parent not found
  < code >
  
  This does not seem to be a documented restriction. Anyone know if this is a bug?

  Hi Tony,.

  Looks like you ran into Bug 9539578: INSERT ALL AND TRIGGER CAUSES ERROR LOGGING to FAIL (ROLLBACK)

  Concerning
  Peter

• Outer join, 3 tables

  Please see the attached link for table structures and data of the sample.
  
  There will be several lines in the table of SALES with different SALETYPEs. There may be several lines in the table RETURNS, corresponding to some of the points of SALE. RETURNS the table has a foreign key to the SALE. The report that I am trying to generate with a select sql statement must include a line for each type of sale (from table SALETYPE) and the sum of sale amounts corresponding to this type of sale of the SALES table. The table may not return the entries for all types of sales and the amount of Scripture must be reported as zero. The SQL I use is below, but does not work. I hope that I have explained this correctly. Please see the doc attached for typical data that I work with. Can someone please?
  
  https://spreadsheets.Google.com/pub?key=0AnDmnUJXOChwdGF2ZjdjdHFtMGF1MkJ3MWtjQ2JfUmc & hl = in & Single = true & gid = 0 & output = html
  
  Select SUM (s.amount) as sum_amount, t.sale_type from SALES s, SALETYPE t, r RETURNS
  where s.id = r.id
  and s.sale_type_id = t.id
  T.sale_type group;
  
  Published by: 801941 on October 12, 2010 15:02

  Hello - the second displays almost had. what you want to do is joining several tables at once - impossible with the syntax of the oracle, but possible if you use ANSI SQL.

  Wrote file afiedt.buf
  
    1  WITH s AS
    2   (SELECT 1 id, 1 sale_type_id, 10 amount   FROM dual
    3    UNION ALL
    4    SELECT 2, 1, 10  FROM dual
    5    UNION ALL
    6    SELECT 3, 2, 10   FROM dual
    7    UNION ALL
    8    SELECT 4, 2, 10   FROM dual
    9    UNION ALL
   10    SELECT 5, 3, 10    FROM dual
   11    UNION ALL
   12    SELECT 6, 4, 10 FROM dual),
   13  r AS
   14   (SELECT 2 sale_id   FROM dual
   15    UNION ALL
   16    SELECT 3 FROM dual
   17    UNION ALL
   18    SELECT 4 FROM dual),
   19  t AS
   20   (SELECT 1 sale_type_id, 100 sale_type    FROM dual
   21    UNION ALL
   22    SELECT 2, 200    FROM dual
   23    UNION ALL
   24    SELECT 3, 300    FROM dual
   25    UNION ALL
   26    SELECT 4, 400 FROM dual)
   27  SELECT nvl(SUM(s.amount),0) total_amount, t.sale_type
   28    FROM t
   29     join r on (1=1)
   30     left outer join s on (s.id = r.sale_id and s.sale_type_id = t.sale_type_id)
   31   --WHERE s.id(+) = r.sale_id
   32  --   AND s.sale_type_id(+) = t.sale_type_id
   33   GROUP BY t.sale_type
   34*  order by t.sale_type
  SQL> /
  
  TOTAL_AMOUNT  SALE_TYPE
  ------------ ----------
            10        100
            20        200
             0        300
             0        400
  
  4 rows selected.
  

  The two commented lines are what you are trying to achieve using the syntax of the oracle, but which will give you an error.

• Join of tables?

  Hello
  
  
  My 1st question
  

  Sometimes i have hard time in deciding the weather to use equi join or left join or right join ?? 
  
  After looking at the data model i can understand how the tables can be joined on what attribute but i lack in making decision weather to use left join or right join for one to many or many to one relationships 
  
  I know the concept of right join and left join but i get confused in what scenario i need to use left join or right join and what join to use for one to many relationships or many to one relationships
  
  If you have any techniques or suggetions how to use them that will be great!!

  My 2nd question
  
  
  
  
  ___Table1___ TableA
  | | | |
  Table2, table3 table 4 < - TableC - TableB-|
  
  Table 1 a 1 of many relationships of table2, table 3, table 4
  
  I, e Table1-> table 2, table 3, table 4
  
  Table A has many relationships in table 1 B, i, e TableA-> table B
  
  Table B has 1 in-several in Table C, i, e table B-> table C
  
  Table C has many relationships in table 4, i, e 1 C table-> table 4
  
  
  I know the attributes to use to join these tables, but my question is what join what I use left join or right join or Equi join (I don't think I can use this)
  
  
  Something like that in my SQL query in where clause (I don't know if this is right).
  
  Where
  Table1. ID = table2. ID
  or table1.my_field = table3.id
  or table1.my_field = table4.id
  or tableA. ID = tableB.id---(ce que je dois opérateur OR ou opérateur AND???)
  or tableB.id = TableC.id
  or tablec.id = table4.id
  
  I don't know if this right or do I have to use the left join on right join or and or operator operator 'OR' is something I m really confued subject.
  
  
  
  
  Any advice greatly appriciated thank you!
  
  Published by: user642297 on May 12, 2010 09:49
  
  Published by: user642297 on May 12, 2010 09:51

  Apart from referring to various documents and examples...
  Use the following examples as 'Playground' and experience to get an idea of the various "joins".

  -- SETUP for examples...
  drop table A;
  drop table B;
  drop table C;
  
  create table a (ca int, sa varchar2(50));
  
  create table b (cb int, sb varchar2(50));
  
  create table c (cc int, sc varchar2(50));
  
  insert into A
  select * from
  (
  select level myid, to_char( to_date( level,'J'),'Jsp') mystr
  from dual connect by level < 11
  );
  commit;
  
  insert into B
  select * from
  (
  select level myid, to_char( to_date( level,'J'),'Jsp') mystr
  from dual connect by level < 21
  )
  where mod(myid,2) = 0;
  commit;
  
  insert into C
  select * from
  (
  select level myid, to_char( to_date( level,'J'),'Jsp') mystr
  from dual connect by level < 11
  )
  where myid < 6;
  commit;
  
  -- Verify the setup
  select * from A;
  
  select * from B;
  
  select * from C;
  
  -- **************************************************************
  -- Requirement EQUI JOIN 1. (AKA INNER JOIN)
  -- To select rows from A and MATCHING rows from B
  -- use A JOIN B or B JOIN A
  --
  -- ANSI SQL syntax
  select * from
  A JOIN B
  on (A.CA = B.CB)
  ;
  -- **** OR ****
  select * from
  B JOIN A
  on (A.CA = B.CB)
  ;
  -- OR Traditional Oracle syntax
  select * from A, B
  where A.CA = B.CB
  ;
  
  -- **************************************************************
  -- Requirement EQUI JOIN 2. (AKA INNER JOIN)
  -- To select rows from A and MATCHING rows from B and matching
  -- rows from C
  -- use A JOIN B JOIN C
  --
  -- ANSI SQL syntax
  select * from
  A JOIN B
  on (A.CA = B.CB)
  JOIN C
  on(B.CB = C.CC)
  ;
  -- OR Traditional Oracle syntax
  select * from A, B, C
  where A.CA = B.CB
    and B.CB = C.CC
  ;
  
  -- **************************************************************
  -- Requirement OUTER JOIN 1.
  -- To select ALL rows from A and ONLY MATCHING rows from B
  -- use A LEFT OUTER JOIN B or B RIGHT OUTER JOIN A
  --
  -- The columns for table B will have NULL value where a
  -- match for A is not found
  --
  -- ANSI SQL syntax
  select * from
  A LEFT OUTER JOIN B
  on (A.CA = B.CB)
  ;
  -- **** OR ****
  select * from
  B RIGHT OUTER JOIN A
  on (A.CA = B.CB)
  ;
  -- OR Traditional Oracle syntax
  select * from A, B
  where A.CA = B.CB(+)
  ;
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  -- The queries above are EQUIVALENT - return the same
  -- result set.
  -- **** However note the "order" in which the rows are
  --      returned by default.
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  
  -- **************************************************************
  -- Requirement OUTER JOIN 2.
  -- To select ALL rows from B and ONLY MATCHING rows from A
  -- use B LEFT OUTER JOIN A or A RIGHT OUTER JOIN B
  --
  -- The columns for table A will have NULL value where a
  -- match for B is not found
  --
  -- ANSI SQL syntax
  select * from
  B LEFT OUTER JOIN A
  on (A.CA = B.CB)
  ;
  -- **** OR ****
  select * from
  A RIGHT OUTER JOIN B
  on (A.CA = B.CB)
  ;
  -- Traditional Oracle syntax
  select * from A, B
  where A.CA(+) = B.CB
  ;
  
  -- **************************************************************
  -- Requirement OUTER JOIN 3.
  -- To select ALL rows from A and ONLY MATCHING rows from B
  -- AND select those rows from C that match rows from B
  --
  -- ANSI SQL syntax
  select * from
  A LEFT OUTER JOIN B
  on (A.CA = B.CB)
   LEFT OUTER JOIN C
  on (B.CB = C.CC)
  ;
  -- OR Traditional Oracle syntax
  select * from A, B, C
  where A.CA = B.CB(+)
    and B.CB = C.CC(+)
  ;
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  -- and So on...
  
  -- **************************************************************
  -- Requirement FULL JOIN 3.
  -- To select ALL rows from A and ALL rows from B
  -- AND MATCH the rows from A and B that match, but return even
  -- the unmatching rows.
  --
  -- ANSI SQL syntax
  select * from
  A FULL OUTER JOIN B
  on (A.CA = B.CB)
  ;
  -- OR Traditional Oracle syntax
  -- There is no equivalent for FULL OUTER join in traditional
  -- syntax. (Though it can be achieved using other means)
  -----------------------------------------------------------------
  

  VR,
  Sudhakar B.

• BI multi evil SQL transaction

  After that we upgrade to OBIEE 10.1.3.3 7.8.2, our report does not work. The report is based on tables OPLT Siebel life sciences. I checked the RPD, it is almost exactly the same as in 7.8.2. However, the SQL code generated by the BI server in 10.1.3.3 contains a join that would return no records.
  Here are the two SQLs:
  
  In 7.8.2:
  
  Select distinct D1.c1 as c1,
  D1. C2 C2,
  D1. C3 as c3,
  D1. C4 as c4,
  D1. C5 as c5,
  D1. C6 as c6,
  D1. As c7 C7
  Of
  (select distinct T1027. PTCL_NUM C1,
  T10664. SITE_NUM C2,
  T52895. Name as c3,
  T52895. TODO_CD as c4,
  T52895. EVT_STAT_CD like c5,
  T52895. DOC_RCVD_DT as c6,
  T52895.comments as c7
  Of
  S_PTCL_SITE_LS T10664 / * Site of the Protocol * /,.
  S_CL_PTCL_LS T1027 / * protocols * /,.
  S_EVT_ACT T52895 / * activity * /.
  where (T10664. ROW_ID = T52895. CL_PTCL_ST_ID
  and T1027. ROW_ID = T10664. CL_PTCL_ID
  and T52895. SUBTYPE_CD = 'Document')
  ) D1
  order by c1, c2, c3, c4, c5, c6, c7
  
  
  In OBIEE 10.1.3.3, shows SQL as follows. The join ' T438245. ROW_ID = T443245. ROW_ID' is between 'S_EVT_ACT' and 'S_CL_PTCL_LS', their row_id would not match.
  
  Where should I look for the index to such a problem?
  
  
  Select distinct T438245. PTCL_NUM C1,
  T442683. SITE_NUM C2,
  T443245. TODO_CD as c3,
  T443245. Name as c4,
  T443245. EVT_STAT_CD like c5,
  T443245. DOC_RCVD_DT as c6,
  T443245.comments as c7
  Of
  S_PTCL_SITE_LS T442683 / * Site of the Protocol * /,.
  S_CL_PTCL_LS T438245 / * protocols * /,.
  S_EVT_ACT T443245 / * activity * /.
  where (T438245. ROW_ID = T442683. CL_PTCL_ID
  and T438245. ROW_ID = T443245. ROW_ID
  and T442683. ROW_ID = T443245. CL_PTCL_ST_ID
  and T443245. SUBTYPE_CD = 'Document')
  order by c1, c2, c3, c4, c5, c6, c7
  
  Thank you very much!

  Check the join in the physical layer between S_CL_PTCL_LS and S_EVT_AC.

  What you say (they do not match), they should not be reached. Ensure THAT RPD has only the correct joins so that the BI server can join your tables properly.
  I wander if RPD 7.8.2 the join was there but BI Server never used it, can you confirm for us?