Cross join to Hi in oracle

Hello

I have below the text values.

Platimum

Silver

VIP

Bronze

I want to get cross-from above like four

Platimum	Silver	VIP	Bronze
Platimum	VIP	Silver	Bronze
Platimum	Bronze	VIP	Silver
Platimum	Silver	VIP	Bronze

And so on. It should give me 16 combinations that I guess.

How can I achieve this?

Kind regards

Mahesh

Another way to generate permutations (if nocycle seems suspicious)

with

data in the form of

(select "Platimum" val of union double all the)

Select 'Cash' of all the double union

Select 'VIP' of all the double union

Select "Bronze" double

permutator (swap) as

(select val

from the data

Union of all the

Select swap. «, » || Val

data,.

permutator

where instr (permutation, val) = 0

)

Select the permutation

of the permutator

where regexp_count (permutation, ',') = 3

order by swapping

PERMUTATION
Bronze, Platimum, silver, VIP
Bronze, Platimum, VIP, Silver
Bronze, Silver, Platimum, VIP
Bronze, Silver, VIP, Platimum
Bronze, VIP, Platimum, Silver
Bronze, Silver, VIP, Platimum
Platimum, Bronze, silver, VIP
Platimum, Bronze, Silver, VIP
Platimum, silver, Bronze, VIP
Platimum, silver, VIP, Bronze
Platimum, VIP, Bronze, silver
Platimum, VIP, silver, Bronze
Silver, Bronze, Platimum, VIP
Silver, Bronze, VIP, Platimum
Money, Platimum, Bronze, VIP
Silver, Platimum, VIP, Bronze
Silver, VIP, Bronze, Platimum
Silver, VIP, Platimum, Bronze
VIP, Bronze, Platimum, silver
VIP Bronze, silver, Platimum
VIP, Platimum, Bronze, silver
VIP, Platimum, silver, Bronze
VIP, silver, Bronze, Platimum
VIP, money, Platimum, Bronze

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

Auto cross join

Hello.

Why Cross join on a table without specifying alias does not work properly ?

with
    t1 as (
      select 1 as q1, 2 as q2 from dual union 
      select 3, 4 from dual union 
      select 5, 6 from dual
  )
select *
  from t1
    cross join t1
order by 1
        Q1         Q2         Q1         Q2
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
         1          2          1          2 
         1          2          1          2 
         1          2          1          2 
         3          4          3          4 
         3          4          3          4 
         3          4          3          4 
         5          6          5          6 
         5          6          5          6 
         5          6          5          6 

 9 rows selected

11.2.0.3.0 - 64 bit

2837285 wrote:

Ok.

Why 10 gr 2 we have error ORA-00918 (same self-join) and 11 g works, but the wrong result?

Why don't you ask Oracle via a support request, it's a bug.

You can't say he is working on 11g "but which gives bad result." Clearly if it is to give a wrong result then it doesn't work.

What happens on 11g is the fact that it runs without the exception of ambiguous column. There are a few known bugs in the way SQL ANSI has implemented compared to the regular SQL Oracle syntax. Oracle worked to correct.

I don't have 12 c to test, but it may have already been corrected in this version.

Difference between a CROSS JOIN and a Cartesian product of the noted comma?

Hello everyone,

Oracle version: Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64 bit
OS: Linux Fedora Core 17 (x86_64)

I was practicing on recursive subquery factoring based on oracle examples available in the documentation
http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e26088/statements_10002.htm#i2129904

I was working on an example that displays the hierarchy of each manager with related employees. Here's how

WITH tmptab(empId, mgrId, lvl) AS
(
    SELECT  employee_id, manager_id, 0 lvl
    FROM employees
    WHERE manager_id IS NULL
    UNION ALL
    SELECT  employee_id, manager_id, lvl+1
    FROM employees, tmptab
    WHERE (manager_id = empId)
)
SEARCH DEPTH FIRST BY mgrId SET order1
SELECT LPAD(' ', lvl * 3, ' ') || empId AS empId
FROM tmptab;

Which gives the desired result

EMPID
---------------------
100
   101
      108
      109
      110
      111
      112
      113
      200
      203
      204
      205
      206
   102
      103
      104
      105
      106
      107
   114
      115
      116
      117
      118
      119
   120
      125
      126
      127
      128
      180
      181
      182
      183
   121
      129
      130
      131
      132
      184
      185
      186
      187
   122
      133
      134
      135
      136
      188
      189
      190
      191
   123
      137
      138
      139
      140
      192
      193
      194
      195
   124
      141
      142
      143
      144
      196
      197
      198
      199
   145
      150
      151
      152
      153
      154
      155
   146
      156
      157
      158
      159
      160
      161
   147
      162
      163
      164
      165
      166
      167
   148
      168
      169
      170
      171
      172
      173
   149
      174
      175
      176
      177
      178
      179
   201
      202

107 rows selected.

SQL>

However, by chance, I noticed that if I put CROSS JOIN instead of put a comma between table names, the same query behaves differently.

In other words, if instead of writing

. . .
UNION ALL
    SELECT  employee_id, manager_id, lvl+1
    FROM employees, tmptab
    WHERE (manager_id = empId)

I am writing

. . .
UNION ALL
    SELECT  employee_id, manager_id, lvl+1
    FROM employees CROSS JOIN tmptab
    WHERE (manager_id = empId)

I get the following error message

ERROR at line 4:
ORA-32044: cycle detected while executing recursive WITH query

Any idea?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I remember, oracle supports as many JOIN CROSSROADS notation for Cartesian product (vector product =). For example

SQL> WITH tmptab1 AS
  2  (
  3      SELECT 'a1' AS colval FROM DUAL UNION ALL
  4      SELECT 'a2' AS colval FROM DUAL UNION ALL
  5      SELECT 'a3' AS colval FROM DUAL
  6  ),
  7  tmptab2 AS
  8  (
  9      SELECT 'b1' AS colval FROM DUAL UNION ALL
 10      SELECT 'b2' AS colval FROM DUAL
 11  )
 12  SELECT t1.colval, t2.colval
 13  FROM tmptab1 t1 CROSS JOIN tmptab2 t2;

CO CO
-- --
a1 b1
a2 b1
a3 b1
a1 b2
a2 b2
a3 b2

6 rows selected.

SQL> LIST 13
 13* FROM tmptab1 t1 CROSS JOIN tmptab2 t2
SQL>
SQL>
SQL> CHANGE /CROSS JOIN/,
 13* FROM tmptab1 t1 , tmptab2 t2
SQL> 
SQL>
SQL> LIST
  1  WITH tmptab1 AS
  2  (
  3  SELECT 'a1' AS colval FROM DUAL UNION ALL
  4  SELECT 'a2' AS colval FROM DUAL UNION ALL
  5  SELECT 'a3' AS colval FROM DUAL
  6  ),
  7  tmptab2 AS
  8  (
  9  SELECT 'b1' AS colval FROM DUAL UNION ALL
 10  SELECT 'b2' AS colval FROM DUAL
 11  )
 12  SELECT t1.colval, t2.colval
 13* FROM tmptab1 t1 , tmptab2 t2
SQL> 
SQL> /

CO CO
-- --
a1 b1
a2 b1
a3 b1
a1 b2
a2 b2
a3 b2

6 rows selected.

SQL>

So if the two rated commas and CROSS JOIN have the same semantics, why do I get a cycle mentioned above cites recursive subquery factoring while the same query works pretty well with comma between table instead of CROSS JOIN names? Because if a cycle is detected (= current element ancestor) it means that the product with the CROSS JOIN notation produces duplicates which are absent in the result of the Cartesian product rated comma.

I would appreciate it if you could kindly shed some light.

Thanks in advance,

Kind regards
Dariyoosh

Hello

dariyoosh wrote:
... Oracle terminology could become really confusing. But once again, according to the online glossary, a Cartesian product is apparently regarded as a join
http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e25789/glossary.htm?type=popup#CNCPT44493
>

There is no doubt that a Cartesian product (also called cross join) is a join. If loops in a WITH recursive clause are detected after completing the joins, but before other conditions apply, the relevant question here is "what are the requirements to join?
In the ANSI syntax, the distinction is always clear. Join conditions occur in the... Clause WE

SELECT  employee_id, manager_id, lvl + 1
FROM      employees
JOIN        tmptab          ON  (manager_id = empId)     -- Join condition
;

and other conditions occur in the WHERE (or HAVING or CONNECT BY) clause.

SELECT  employee_id, manager_id, lvl + 1
FROM            employees
CROSS JOIN         tmptab
WHERE  (manager_id = empId)     -- NOT a join condition
;

In the joins of the former, it seems to be the case that any condition involving 2 or more tables (or the + indicator of outer join) is a condtion of join:

SELECT  employee_id, manager_id, lvl + 1
FROM      employees
,         tmptab
WHERE  (manager_id = empId)     -- Join condition
;

CARTESIAN/CROSS JOIN
Hello
I use OBIEE version 11.1.1.6.0. I created made dummy table and column in the physical layer. and join all the dimension table with this fact. but I don't know how the business model to deal with it. can someone help me to create a cross join?
Thank you

Published by: 968086 on October 30, 2012 12:59 AM
Follow this link
http://www.rittmanmead.com/2009/08/Oracle-BI-EE-10-1-3-4-1-reporting-on-non-transactional-dimension-values-equivalence-of-outer-joins/

Score pls help if

Extract multiple lines using the technique of the cross join

Hello.

Can someone suggest a method to return 3 lines of a query when otherwise would return only one line?

I am trying to reach the analog SQL logic to this topic-

SELECT x.foo, p.id, p.name FROM people p CROSS JOIN (SELECT 1 AS foo UNION ALL SELECT 2 UNION ALL SELECT 3) x;

Reason: I want a result three rows (n) force and use GROUP BY with case statements to create 3 levels summary.

Here is a simple SQL logical expression that works for my setup - OBI

SELECT
     "- Nx_CSDG0_Repair_Orders (Depot Repair Views)".Repair_Number saw_0,
     "- Nx_CSDG0_Repair_Orders (Depot Repair Views)".SR_Operating_Unit_Name saw_1
FROM
     "[Noetix-NoetixGlobalRepository] NoetixViews for Oracle Service"     
WHERE 
     ("- Nx_CSDG0_Repair_Orders (Depot Repair Views)".Repair_Number = '338246')

But I think that I can't do--

SELECT
     "- Nx_CSDG0_Repair_Orders (Depot Repair Views)".Repair_Number saw_0,
     "- Nx_CSDG0_Repair_Orders (Depot Repair Views)".SR_Operating_Unit_Name saw_1
FROM
     "[Noetix-NoetixGlobalRepository] NoetixViews for Oracle Service"
     CROSS JOIN (SELECT 1 AS foo UNION ALL SELECT 2 UNION ALL SELECT 3)
WHERE 
     ("- Nx_CSDG0_Repair_Orders (Depot Repair Views)".Repair_Number = '338246')

But what peut do?

Thank you.

-cs

Hi CSeelig,

The BI server uses the ANSI SQL standard. Then all the SQL that follows this specification in OBIEE will work.

I did an example with intensification:
http://gerardnico.com/wiki/dat/OBIEE/logical_sql/obiee_sql_densification

You will see a cross join to make a densification.

See you soon
Nico

[8i] need help with full outer join combined with a cross join...

I can't understand how to combine a full outer join with a different type of join... is it possible?

Here are some create table and insert for examples of database:

CREATE TABLE     my_tab1
(     record_id     NUMBER     NOT NULL     
,     workstation     VARCHAR2(4)
,     my_value     NUMBER
     CONSTRAINT my_tab1_pk PRIMARY KEY (record_id)
);

INSERT INTO     my_tab1
VALUES(1,'ABCD',10);
INSERT INTO     my_tab1
VALUES(2,'ABCD',15);
INSERT INTO     my_tab1
VALUES(3,'ABCD',5);
INSERT INTO     my_tab1
VALUES(4,'A123',5);
INSERT INTO     my_tab1
VALUES(5,'A123',10);
INSERT INTO     my_tab1
VALUES(6,'A123',20);
INSERT INTO     my_tab1
VALUES(7,'????',5);


CREATE TABLE     my_tab2
(     workstation     VARCHAR2(4)
,     wkstn_name     VARCHAR2(20)
     CONSTRAINT my_tab2_pk PRIMARY KEY (workstation)
);

INSERT INTO     my_tab2
VALUES('ABCD','WKSTN 1');
INSERT INTO     my_tab2
VALUES('A123','WKSTN 2');
INSERT INTO     my_tab2
VALUES('B456','WKSTN 3');

CREATE TABLE     my_tab3
(     my_nbr1     NUMBER
,     my_nbr2     NUMBER
);

INSERT INTO     my_tab3
VALUES(1,2);
INSERT INTO     my_tab3
VALUES(2,3);
INSERT INTO     my_tab3
VALUES(3,4);

And, the results that I want to get:

workstation     sum(my_value)     wkstn_name     my_nbr1     my_nbr2
---------------------------------------------------------------
ABCD          30          WKSTN 1          1     2
ABCD          30          WKSTN 1          2     3
ABCD          30          WKSTN 1          3     4
A123          35          WKSTN 2          1     2
A123          35          WKSTN 2          2     3
A123          35          WKSTN 2          3     4
B456          0          WKSTN 3          1     2
B456          0          WKSTN 3          2     3
B456          0          WKSTN 3          3     4
????          5          NULL          1     2
????          5          NULL          2     3
????          5          NULL          3     4

I tried a number of different things, google my problem and no luck yet...

SELECT     t1.workstation
,     SUM(t1.my_value)
,     t2.wkstn_name
,     t3.my_nbr1
,     t3.my_nbr2
FROM     my_tab1 t1
,     my_tab2 t2
,     my_tab3 t3
...

So, what I want, it's a full outer join of t1 and t2 on workstation and a cross join of one with the t3. I wonder if I can't find examples of it online because it is not possible...

Note: I'm stuck dealing with Oracle 8i

Thank you!!

Hello

The query I posted yesterday is a little more complex that it should be.
My_tab2.workstation is unique, there is no reason to make a separate subquery as mt1. We can join my_tab1 to my_tab2 and get the SUM in a subquery.

SELECT       foj.workstation
,       foj.sum_my_value
,       foj.wkstn_name
,       mt3.my_nbr1
,       mt3.my_nbr2
FROM       (     -- Begin in-line view foj for full outer join
          SELECT        mt1.workstation
          ,        SUM (mt1.my_value)     AS sum_my_value
          ,        mt2.wkstn_name
          FROM        my_tab1   mt1
          ,        my_tab2   mt2
          WHERE        mt1.workstation     = mt2.workstation (+)
          GROUP BY   mt1.workstation
          ,        mt2.wkstn_name
                        --
                UNION ALL
                        --
          SELECT      workstation
          ,      0      AS sum_my_value
          ,      wkstn_name
          FROM      my_tab2
          WHERE      workstation     NOT IN (     -- Begin NOT IN sub-query
                                           SELECT      workstation
                                   FROM      my_tab1
                                   WHERE      workstation     IS NOT NULL
                                 )     -- End NOT IN sub-query
       ) foj     -- End in-line view foj for full outer join
,       my_tab3  mt3
ORDER BY  foj.wkstn_name
,       foj.workstation
,       mt3.my_nbr1
,       mt3.my_nbr2
;

Thanks for posting the CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, and very clear expected results!

user11033437 wrote:
... So, what I want, it's a full outer join of t1 and t2 on workstation and a cross join of one with the t3.

She, exactly!
The trickiest part is when and how get SUM (my_value). You could address the question of exactly what my_tab3 must be attached to a cross that's exactly what should look like the result set of the full outer join between my_tab1 and my_tab2 to. To do this, take your desired results, remove columns that do not come from the outer join complete and delete duplicate rows. You will get:

workstation     sum(my_value)     wkstn_name
-----------     -------------   ----------
ABCD          30          WKSTN 1
A123          35          WKSTN 2
B456          0          WKSTN 3
????          5          NULL

So the heart of the problem is how to get these results of my_tab1 and my_tab2, which is done in the subquery FOJ above.

I tried to use auto-documenté in my code names. I hope you can understand.
I could spend hours explaining the different parts of this query more in detail, but I don't know that I would lose some of that time, explain things that you already understand. If you want an explanation of the specific element (s), let me know.

Inline query vs cross join

Hi all
Two tables which have no relationship with each other. For example, an Employees table and a systemparameter with a startworktime table.
We need a query with the data in the two tables:
Get all employees and the startworktime (which is the same for everyone)
Which is cheaper: an inline query or a product Cartesian or crossjoin?
Inine:
Select name, function
(by selecting startworktime in systemparameter)
employees;
Cartesian product:
SELECT name, function, startwoime
rktfrom used
Cross join systemparameter;
Your opinion about this.

Both these do the same thing. I seriously doubt if we would have the benefits of performance on the other.

Kind regards

Pivot + cross join

Hello

I wrote the following query, which works very well:

select * from
(
     select
          to_char(SCB_OPENTIME, 'YYYY-MM') as curr_date,
          SCB_TASK
     from EM_DATA_MSR_SC
)
pivot
(
     count(SCB_TASK) for curr_date in
     (
          '2011-01',
          '2011-02',
          '2011-03',
          '2011-04',
          '2011-05',
          '2011-06',
          '2011-07',
          '2011-08',
          '2011-09',
          '2011-10',
          '2011-11',
          '2011-12'
     )
);

Now, I need to apply a cross thereon join:

select * from
(
     select
          to_char(SCB_OPENTIME, 'YYYY-MM') as curr_date,
          SCB_TASK
     from EM_DATA_MSR_SC
     where
          EMSCG_STATUS = status.name
)
pivot
(
     count(SCB_TASK) for curr_date in
     (
          '2011-01',
          '2011-02',
          '2011-03',
          '2011-04',
          '2011-05',
          '2011-06',
          '2011-07',
          '2011-08',
          '2011-09',
          '2011-10',
          '2011-11',
          '2011-12'
     )
)
cross join
(
    select 0, 'Closed' as name from DUAL union
    select 1, 'Denied' from DUAL union
    select 2, 'Open' from DUAL
) status;

When I try to run this query, I get this error message:

"STATUS"."NAME": invalid identifier

However, SQL is supposed to have brought on a deep level table references.
I'm doing something wrong?

Hello

If this is what you want, then you don't want a cross join. The inner join in the view online with no name is the only reference to beaches you need.

with ranges as
(
    select 0, 0 as mini, 20 as maxi from DUAL union
    select 1, 21, 50 from DUAL union
    select 2, 51, 300 from DUAL
)
select * from
(
     select  r.mini,
          r.maxi,
          to_char (t.DAT, 'YYYY-MM')     as curr_date,
          t.NUM
     from      TEST     t
     join      RANGES     r     on      t.NUM >= r.mini
                    and      t.NUM <= r.maxi
)
pivot
(
     count(NUM) for curr_date in
     (
          '2011-01',
          '2011-02',
          '2011-03',
          '2011-04',
          '2011-05',
          '2011-06',
          '2011-07',
          '2011-08',
          '2011-09',
          '2011-10',
          '2011-11',
          '2011-12'
     )
)
ORDER BY  mini
;

Depending on your data and your needs, you might want an outer join, not an inner join, like this:

...     from          RANGES     r
     LEFT OUTER JOIN     TEST     t     on      t.NUM >= r.mini
                         and      t.NUM <= r.maxi

Published by: Frank Kulash, November 7, 2011 12:20
Alternative ADED of outer join

cross join?
I was asked if the veiw (select what is wrttien to make the view) has a cross join and follwing some ANSI compliance. So my question is... as table 3 below is used by alias tp and same table3 is used by alias tp2... commandeer that be considered as a cross join?

Sorry, I'm very new to SQL...
```
select col1, col2, col3 from table1 t, table2 t1, table3 tp
where
---
---
---
AND tp.phs_id =
                      (SELECT tp2.phs_id
                         FROM table3 tp2
                        WHERE tp2.id = tsp.id
                         AND ROWNUM < 2)
```
Published by: user11168115 on May 14, 2009 12:43
Hello (and welcome)
No, would not be a CROSS JOIN, since your alias tp2 JOINED tp (I guess you mean tp even if you have a TSP). A CROSS JOIN is where no JOIN condition at all is specified for a table (also known as the Cartesian product ), and if it's compatible ANSI SQL will actually be the words CROSS JOIN specified in the JOIN clause. For example:
```
SELECT *
   FROM table1
 CROSS JOIN table2;
```
Otherwise, non-compliant ANSI:
```
SELECT *
  FROM table1, table2;
```

Update/join script to the oracle server

Im trying to create a script using two tables in my oracle server.
Developer SQL im trying to use these two different tables
Table 1: conductorinfo
Table2: calkva
I want to join the two tables based on two fields:
Condsize
Condmatl
(because the two tables have these fields) And based on these games of field, update the field conductorinfo of the table "calckva", because currently we have not these data in the conductorinfo table
This is the script I came up with:
UPDATE conductorinfo
JOIN INTERNAL Calkva
ON conductorinfo.condsize = calkva.condsize
AND conductorinfo.condmatl = calkva.condmatl
SET conductorinfo.calkva = calkva.calculatedkva
WHERE conductorinfo.condsize = calkva.condsize
AND conductorinfo.condmatl = calkva.condmatl
Then I read this update/join cannot be used with an oracle server
Any suggestions?

Hello

Here's a way you can use the MERGE:

MERGE INTO dst conductorinfo

With the HELP of calkva CBC

WE (dst.condsize = src.condsize

AND dst.condmatl = src.condmatl

)

WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE

SET dst.calkva = dst.calculatedkva

;

Joining several tables in Oracle DB

I have the following tables.

1 AddProject
-PROJID
-projName
2 AddLab
-Labrador
-teacher
3 ProjLabAssociation
-PROJID
-Labrador
4 AddResearchArea
-raID
-raName
5 ProjRAAssociation
-PROJID
-raID

AddProject is associated with tables-AddLab and AddResearchArea
ProjLabAssociation and ProjRAAssociation are the association of the tables that contain the primary key of the corresponding tables. The two fields in these 2 tables are primary keys.

If AddProject has 3 entrances - (Proj1, ProjectA) (Proj2 ProjectB), (Proj3, ProjectC)
AddLab has 2 entrances - (Lab1, Bangalore), (Lab2, Chennai)
AddResearchArea has 2 inputs - AM1 (Green Computing) (RA2, Cloud Computing)

ProjLabAssociation has 2 entrances - (Proj2 Lab1), (Proj3, Lab1)
ProjRAAssociation has 3 entries - (Proj2 RA1), (Proj3, AM1), (Proj3, RA2)

If I ask by AddLab given for (Lab1, Bangalore), I should get the following columns in the result table
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table2ID | Table2Name | Table3ID | Table3Name | Table1ID | Table1Name
Lab1. Bangalore | RA1 | Green Computing | Proj2 | Project b
Lab1. Bangalore | RA1 | Green Computing | Proj3 | Project c
Lab1. Bangalore | RA2 | Cloud Computing | Proj3 | Project c
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I tried the following commands but I m getting the expected result

1.

SELECT * FROM AddLab al, ProjLabAssociation pl, AddProject ap WHERE al.labID = pl.labID(+) and ap.projID = pl.projID(+);

A SQLException exception is thrown by saying - java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01417: a table can be external joined as another table

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2.

SELECT * FROM AddLab,AddProject,AddResearchArea WHERE labID in 
(select al.labID from ProjLabAssociation pl,AddLab al  where al.labID = pl.labID)
AND projID in
(select ap.projID from ProjLabAssociation pl,Addproject ap where ap.projID = pl.projID)
AND themeID in 
(select ar.raID from ProjRAAssociation pr, AddResearchArea ar where ar.raID = pr.raID)
AND projID in
(select ap.projID from ProjRAAssociation pr,Addproject ap where ap.projID = pr.projID)
ORDER BY labID;

I do not get results expcted here

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oracle version: 9i 10g / 11g

Can anyone help me in this.

Published by: user9205634 on December 22, 2011 03:40

Hello

Below the code gives the result

with table1 as
(
select 'Proj1' as table1id,'ProjectA' as table1name from dual
union all
select 'Proj2' as table1id,'ProjectB' as table1name from dual
union all
select 'Proj3' as table1id,'ProjectC' as table1name from dual
union all
select 'Proj4' as table1id,'ProjectD' as table1name from dual
)
,table2 as
(
select 'Lab1' as table2id,'Bangalore' as table2name from dual
union all
select 'Lab2' as table2id,'Chennai' as table2name from dual
union all
select 'Lab3' as table2id,'Delhi' as table2name from dual
)
, table3 as
(
select 'RA1' as table3id,'Green Computing' as table3name from dual
union all
select 'RA2' as table3id,'Cloud Computing' as table3name from dual
)
,table1table2 as
(
select 'Proj2' as table1id,'Lab1' as table2id from dual
union all
select 'Proj3' as table1id,'Lab1' as table2id from dual
union all
select 'Proj3' as table1id,'Lab2' as table2id from dual
union all
select 'Proj4' as table1id,'Lab3' as table2id from dual
)
,table1table3 as
(
select 'Proj2' as table1id,'RA1' as table3id from dual
union all
select 'Proj3' as table1id,'RA1' as table3id from dual
union all
select 'Proj3' as table1id,'RA2' as table3id from dual
)
select t2.table2id,t2.table2name,t3.table3id,t3.table3name,t1.table1id,t1.table1name
from table1 t1,table2 t2,table3 t3,table1table2 jt1t2,table1table3 jt1t3
where
jt1t2.table2id=t2.table2id and
t1.table1id=jt1t2.table1id and
jt1t3.table1id(+)=jt1t2.table1id and
t3.table3id(+)=jt1t3.table3id
order by t2.table2name,t3.table3id;

TABLE2ID TABLE2NAME TABLE3ID TABLE3NAME      TABLE1ID TABLE1NAME
-------- ---------- -------- --------------- -------- ----------
Lab1     Bangalore  RA1      Green Computing Proj2    ProjectB
Lab1     Bangalore  RA1      Green Computing Proj3    ProjectC
Lab1     Bangalore  RA2      Cloud Computing Proj3    ProjectC
Lab2     Chennai    RA1      Green Computing Proj3    ProjectC
Lab2     Chennai    RA2      Cloud Computing Proj3    ProjectC
Lab3     Delhi                               Proj4    ProjectD   

 6 rows selected

Kind regards
Prabhu

ANSI join kick off session Oracle

Under query works fine in 11I instance but not in R12. If I remove the text "INNER JOIN" and "LEFT OUTER JOIN" and replace it with the old syntax, then it's job to join. Here join ANSI is used if confused about how convert ANSI join old syntax.
WITH mo_rsrv
AS (SELECT / * + materialize * /)
Mr.organization_id,
Mr.inventory_item_id,
Mr.subinventory_code,
WLP.attribute3 document_type,
Mr.locator_id,
Mr.demand_source_line_id,
Mr.demand_source_name,
Mr.attribute6,
SUM (primary_reservation_quantity)
primary_reservation_quantity
OF mtl_reservations m., wwt_lookups wlp
WHERE mr.demand_source_type_id = wlp.attribute2
AND wlp.lookup_type = 'XXXX '.
AND wlp.attribute1 = 'PO '.
Mr.organization_id GROUP,
Mr.inventory_item_id,
Mr.subinventory_code,
WLP.attribute3,
Mr.locator_id,
Mr.demand_source_line_id,
Mr.demand_source_name,
Mr.attribute6),
po_ship_rec
AS (SELECT polla.ship_to_organization_id,
Polla.po_header_id,
Polla.po_line_id,
SUM (polla.quantity - NVL (polla.quantity_cancelled, 0))
quantity
OF apps.po_line_locations_all polla
-WHERE po_header_id = 191275
Polla.ship_to_organization_id GROUP,
Polla.po_header_id,
Polla.po_line_id)
SELECT "PO" document_type,
poha. Segment1,
Line_number, To_char (pola.line_num),
Ship_set NULL,
Msik.concatenated_segments ordered_item,
Pola.attribute4 config,
Pola.attribute14 material_designator,
Pola.CREATION_DATE needby_date,
po_ship_rec. Quantity,
mo_rsrv.primary_reservation_quantity,
"reservation_status,.
"total_onhand,.
poha.po_header_id,
Pola.po_line_id,
po_ship_rec.ship_to_organization_id,
Pola.item_id,
Ship_set_id TO_NUMBER (NULL),
Top_model_id TO_NUMBER (NULL),
Pola.last_update_date,
Pola.last_updated_by,
Pola.CREATION_DATE,
Pola.created_by
OF po_ship_rec
INNER JOIN apps.po_headers_all poha
WE (poha.po_header_id = po_ship_rec.po_header_id)
INNER JOIN apps.po_lines_all pola
WE (pola.po_line_id = po_ship_rec.po_line_id)
INNER JOIN apps.mtl_system_items_kfv reform
WE (msik.organization_id =
po_ship_rec.ship_to_organization_id
AND msik.inventory_item_id = pola.item_id)
LEFT OUTER JOIN mo_rsrv
WE (mo_rsrv.demand_source_name = poha.segment1
AND mo_rsrv.attribute6 = pola.po_line_id
AND mo_rsrv.organization_id =
po_ship_rec.ship_to_organization_id
AND mo_rsrv.inventory_item_id = pola.item_id)
WHERE 1 = 1;

Suspicion of MATERIALIZATION is undocumented and may cause errors, or bad results. Your query works if you remove the indicator?

SY.

During the week to Daily Record Explosion?
Hello

I'm looking for a way to take a set of documents stamped with a weekend date and explode in a recordset for each day of this week. The data of the entire file would be identical, except for the date column. Here is an example.
```
item_id  week_end_date   some_value
1        2009-12-05      5
1        2009-12-12      10
1        2009-12-19      15
2        2009-12-05      20
2        2009-12-12      25
2        2009-12-19      30
```
What I want on the other end is something like this (I'll do only the first two records from above). I put an asterisk on the 'source' folder
```
item_id  week_end_date   some_value
1        2009-11-29      5
1        2009-11-30      5
1        2009-12-01      5
1        2009-12-02      5
1        2009-12-03      5
1        2009-12-04      5
1        2009-12-05      5*
1        2009-12-06      10
1        2009-12-07      10
1        2009-12-08      10
1        2009-12-09      10
1        2009-12-10      10
1        2009-12-11      10
1        2009-12-12      10*
```
I know I could do with a PL/SQL loop, but I am interested in more than one pure solution of SQL.

My thought was to do a temp of sorts with 7 rows table and a column. It would basically be numbers between 0 and -6. Then in my SQL I assemble and simply add the value of the temporary table to the week_end_date blew up the records on. I would like to know if I'm crazy or on the right track. If I'm heading in the right direction, I would need a little help with the implementation.

Thanks in advance.
Hello

Welcome to the forum!

You have the right idea, with a table 7-row 1-column, but there is no need to create an actual table.
You can use a subquery, as cntr below, created within the application itself and then join the result set of the subquery as if it were a table:
```
WITH     cntr     AS
(
     SELECT     LEVEL - 1     AS n
     FROM     dual
     CONNECT BY     LEVEL <= 7
)
SELECT     item_id
,     week_end_date - n     AS a_date
,     some_value
FROM          table_x
CROSS JOIN     cntr
;
```
In Oracle, it is rarely necessary to create temporary tables.

Join Oracle

Hello
I have the following data
create or replace view offdays as
(
Select 1 empid, to_date('23/01/2015','dd/mm/yyyy') dt, 1 offday for all double union
Select 2 empid, to_date('23/01/2015','dd/mm/yyyy') dt, 1 offday for all double union
Select 3 empid, to_date('21/01/2015','dd/mm/yyyy') dt, 1 double offday
);
create or replace view payrolldates as
(
Select to_date('21/01/2015','dd/mm/yyyy') as dt of union double all the
Select to_date('22/01/2015','dd/mm/yyyy') as dt of union double all the
Select to_date('23/01/2015','dd/mm/yyyy') as dt of union double all the
Select to_date('24/01/2015','dd/mm/yyyy') as dt of union double all the
Select to_date (' 25/01/2015 ',' dd/mm/yyyy') in the double dt
);
Select * from payrolldates and b offdays left outer join on b.dt order = b.empid a.dt, a.dt;
With the above query, I get after release
DATE
EMPID
OFF
23/01/2015
1
1
23/01/2015
2
1
21/01/2015
3
1
22/01/2015
< NULL >
< NULL >
24/01/2015
< NULL >
< NULL >
25/01/2015
< NULL >
< NULL >
But I need the output as follows
DATE
EMPID
OFF
21/01/2015
1
0
22/01/2015
1
0
23/01/2015
1
1
24/01/2015
1
0
25/01/2015
1
0
21/01/2015
2
0
22/01/2015
2
0
23/01/2015
2
1
24/01/2015
2
0
25/01/2015
2
0
21/01/2015
3
1
22/01/2015
3
0
23/01/2015
3
0
24/01/2015
3
0
25/01/2015
3
0
I use oracle 10 g.
Help, please

According to the power requested that each record in the view offdays should be repeated as many times as the number of records in the view of payrolldates-, this could be done via the cross join and a simple CASE statement to get an output of the column offday.

Select a.dt

empid

case when a.dt = b.dt

then offday

0 otherwise

end offday

of payrolldates one

offdays b

order of b.empid, a.dt;

Expected to a join behaviours?

Hello

formalities:

Select * from version of v$.

Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64 bit Production

PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

CORE Production 11.2.0.3.0

AMT for 64-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

the question:

I was just wondering why this "join" between A and B do not work. A has no lines, B a 1 row

> my first answer... it should give 1 rank...

but alas... it doesn't!

the original request:

SELECT A.*,
  B.*,
CASE WHEN A.METH = 'PAL' THEN '1'
  ELSE A.CFGNR_OFRESTPAL 
END VWNR_OFRESTPAL
FROM    CDCROBOTVERDICHTLOCSTATVW A,
  CDCVERDICHTSETTINGSVW B

> No rows returned

so I checked the counts:

Select count (*) in the CDCROBOTVERDICHTLOCSTATVW A;

Select count (*) in the CDCVERDICHTSETTINGSVW B;

Hmmm... very strange

so I ran a few tests more:

SELECT  A.*, B.*, CASE WHEN A.METH = 'PAL' THEN '1' ELSE A.CFGNR_OFRESTPAL END VWNR_OFRESTPAL
FROM    CDCVERDICHTSETTINGSVW B , CDCROBOTVERDICHTLOCSTATVW A

> no line

SELECT A.*, B.*, CASE WHEN A.METH = 'PAL' THEN '1' ELSE A.CFGNR_OFRESTPAL END VWNR_OFRESTPAL
FROM    CDCVERDICHTSETTINGSVW B cross join CDCROBOTVERDICHTLOCSTATVW A

> no line

SELECT A.*, B.*, CASE WHEN A.METH = 'PAL' THEN '1' ELSE A.CFGNR_OFRESTPAL END VWNR_OFRESTPAL
FROM    CDCVERDICHTSETTINGSVW B full outer join CDCROBOTVERDICHTLOCSTATVW A on 1 =1

> This returns the line from B correctly

ARTNR	PROJECTNR	VARIANT	PROVIDER	QMAX	PRIO	METH	PALLETS	SOMQTY	FULLPALS	RESTQTY	RESTPALS	CFGNR_OFRESTPAL	FREELOCS	DUMMYRECIP	GEEN_VERDICHTING	MAXSRCPALS	MAXOPENPICKSETS	NR_OF_RESTPAL	ORDTYPE	PRIO_ARTNR	VERD_INRGRP	VWNR_OFRESTPAL
														VERDICHT		11	4	3	VERDICHT	QSE00918CLL80	CDCROB

SELECT A.*, B.*, CASE WHEN A.METH = 'PAL' THEN '1' ELSE A.CFGNR_OFRESTPAL END VWNR_OFRESTPAL
FROM  CDCVERDICHTSETTINGSVW B left join CDCROBOTVERDICHTLOCSTATVW A on 1 = 1

> it is also returns the same rank B

Does anyone have an idea on how to fix this... or where to look to fix this?

This is a cross join. It is a Cartesian product. If there are no rows in a table, then you get no rows in the result.

SQL> with a as (select 1 x from dual), b as (select 1 y from dual where 1=0)
  2  select a.*, b.*
  3  from a, b;                                                             

no rows selected

A left or right, or full outer join is apparently what you wanted.

DATE	EMPID	OFF
23/01/2015	1	1
23/01/2015	2	1
21/01/2015	3

DATE	EMPID	OFF
21/01/2015	1	0

Cross join to Hi in oracle

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for