Export JPG at 100% is to reduce the pixel dimensions?

I'm using the most up-to-date Lightroom (5.5) on a Mac under os 10.9.4.

In the not too distant past (I only used Lightroom since April), I was able to export my images processed in full size JPEG format.  It is the physical dimensions... not the amount of data.

Now I can't figure out why, but Lightroom started to decrease my JPEG files. My test image was 4665 x 4000 pixels and there is a month Lightroom exported the JPGs to exactly these dimensions.  Since then, something changed (probably an update!) and when I try now to export the same image of his reduction of the size of the release of 1985 x 1702!

My export settings are set to 100% quality jpeg, resize options are turned off. Limit the size of file is disabled.

I trashed the preferences of Lightroom and Photoshop.

Is happening?

I need to export these files at full size but Lightroom seems to ignore its own settings!

Help!

Adam

No - it's not it.but thank you for the suggestion

I just figured out the problem.

It seems that Lightroom had lost the original photo and was working on a smart preview file. Once I had located the original it recorded properly.

I guess that serves me right for not reading the manual before jumping into this App!

Adam

Tags: Photoshop Lightroom

Similar Questions

  • How do you find the pixel dimensions of a photo in Illustrator CC?

    We have recently improved our CC CS3 software. I can't determine the pixel dimensions of the picture I want to incorporate into Illustrator. In our old workflow, we have simply clicked on the object in Illustrator and then open a new document in Photoshop, and it would retain the dimensions to the size of our document in Illustrator. It is then a simple matter to paste the picture into the box, position and crop and save as a PSD file and then place in Illustrator. It does not more creative cloud. The object shrinks to 72 DPI, while keeping the resolution setting. We must keep our Illustrator files at least, so more files needed the incorporation is not possible.

    I studied a bit and I see other people having similar problems, but I didn't know a workaround or a way to determine the size in pixels. Info by the document Illustrator gives the 72 dpi pixel settings, even if the document is configured to replicate at 200 dpi.

    It's something that used to be so simple, I don't think a lot of upgrade. Now my workflow is horribly long. I have to rasterize all of the graph and then crop that is the inset photo. If there is an easier way, please tell me. All the literature is back, on the placement of an image already size of PS in Illustrator. I need the other side "round.

    Thanks in advance for any help.

    I think I have a solution: make sure Clipboard settings are on 72 cut and paste a 72 dpi in PS file, because it seems that Illustrator images are seen in this way, regardless of the output resolution. Click on Photoshop and start a new document. It retains the proportions of the Illustrator image in 72 dpi. Open the size of the image, and then make sure that resample is checked. Change the resolution to the desired, in my case 200... Then place and crop your photo and save the PSD file. Open Illustrator and place the PSD file. It works for me.

  • PES 10 suddenly refuses the pixel dimensions

    Hi, I never use anything other than sizes of pixels for resizing. Without any warning, today PSE refuses to allow me. I checked the preferences/units & leaders: leaders and type have the pixel value as they always have been. But now when I try to resize, it gives me the option only per cent, inches, cm, mm, points, picas, and columns; I'm not allowed to use more pixels.

    What has been reached? And how can I work in pixels and this continues?

    First of all, resampling is turned on?

    If it is and you still do not see the pixels, try to delete the preferences: exit the editor and then restart it by pressing ctrl + alt + shift (command + option + shift on a mac). Keep the key down until you see a window asking if you want to delete the settings file. You do.

  • Manually enter the pixel dimensions

    Be a confusion of units of measure here.

    Illy CS5

    For the sake of a clean test: (and not how I normally work, but just to help eliminate any file defining quirks) I create a new doc, using the new Document profile: print.

    Select the Rectangle tool, click the artboard, type in 300px width. Come in.

    In inches, it measures as in 4,1667. Why?

    I expect to be precisely 1 in.

    Also, if I punch in 300pt it comes out to be 4,1667 and more.

    I got lost.

    Illustrator is not a 'resolution' for vector objects based inside the file.

    Pixel is therefore fundamentally. And Illustrator calulates them to 72 dpi.

    There are dozens of threads on this topic in the forum.

  • How to reduce the size of the jpg file, not the size of pixel?

    I prepare images for the web and I really have 2 questions: one on gifs and the other on the jpg files.
    My standard procedure is to reduce the image to the desired at 600 dpi pixel dimensions
    It gives me a little crisp image. can I use this what if the file size is quite low (I try for less than 600 KB) or convert to gif with the save for Web and devices.

    Here are my 2 questions (I'll count this solved with each answer)

    (1) when I convert a gif that I have 4 boxes: one with the original size, the other 3 with options but, often, the options are too low resolution for me how can I change my 3 options starting with a higher res gif?

    (2) if I try to reduce the size of the jpg in the image size box I put the lower resolution (400, 300), which reduces the pixel dimensions and the size of the file, but I don't want to change the pixel dimensions. If I reset the dimensions in pixels to the size I want, even if it is a lower resolution that the file size does not change. How to reduce the size of the jpg file using only the resolution, the pixel dimensions not?  PS I tried to play with the checking and unchecking the 3 small boxes (scale of styles, constrain the proportions and re - sample) but nothing has worked.

    GIF is not a type of large file, especially if you want a sharp image. What are the dimensions of the pixel?

    For the web, it is immaterial that the dpi is, only the last pixel dimensions, so once you have that you want to use 'save for Web and devices' and you can reduce quality - 100% being the maximum and 0% being the lowest. I wouldn't save anything less than 55%. For an image of 600 KB, the size must be large enough.

  • How to reduce the size of an image

    Hello

    Here is my link

    http://BHC.edu.in/GJC/index.html

    Its loading very slowly. I think that the problem would be in the picture. How I could reduce his image of good quality size but have. I tried in photoshop by using ' Save as web. But the quality is not that much good. And as the site loads slowly.

    How can I solve this problem? Please help me.

    Thanks in advance.

    Your images are huge - I downloaded choir.jpg-5456 x 3632 pixel to reduce the pixel dimensions to save for Web.

    When it is maximized on your web page, the images appear about 1336 pixels wide, so I suggest you use this width.

    Quality 60 will be sufficient in most cases. Also be sure to check the Embed profile and convert to sRGB.

    See screenshot below.

  • Reduce the size of the image loses sharpness

    UNTIL YOU GO WITHOUT READING ALL OF THIS, YOU MAY BE ABLE TO HELP BY ANSWERING A SIMPLE QUESTION:

    I have a background that has outside dimensions of 8.5 "x 11".  In the project bin, I am also showing a layer (with transparent edges) that I've resized to 1 "x 1.5".  When I double click on the background to put on the screen, and then drag the layer on the screen, why is she not in look like to a small image at the top of a large?  Instead, it's huge, and I have to drag it to the size with the tool move!

    ===========================================================================

    And now, the history:

    Running PSE9 under Mac OS X 10.6.8 Snow Leopard.

    My project is a montage of images in format stamp on a background of letter size, as in the joint - commemorating the woman in the centerpiece.  I tripped but this kind of effort before with great success.  This small time pictures come out blurry, and it's because this time I have done one thing differently.

    In previous efforts, I remember somehow reducing the external dimensions of an open file at about 2 'x 3' before the revision and finally adding a layer to the great background (with the help of move tool size to fit), though only when editing, I worked with a reasonable size image and not a stamp (probably using command +).  The final images were all sharp.   On this effort, however, my brain of aging has not helped remind me how to do likewise and I ended up working with the original photo, and then when I added it as a layer, I reduced by using the move tool - very awkward, because the edited layer image seems to be larger than the canvas, I was building , and the final images were blurred.

    I started to read help about resizing, but it was much too much information for me to absorb before the end of the year, and I want to complete the work within the next few days. (The attached picture IS the ongoing project, and I whipped out in one day, albeit blurred).   I'd appreciate if someone could give me a step-by-step brute force to make in the way I've done it successfully before.

    Mary Canvas.jpg

    The answer to your first question, and the big one are very closely related. When you combine images, the resolution of the background layer (background) determines the resolution of the whole image. This means that if you have a background of low resolution (say, 72 dpi) and can bring you high resolution images (say, 300 dpi), adding content will be huge compared to the size of the overall picture. When you resize it with the tool move you do yourself a favor if you make significant changes in this way.

    The best way to address the issue is to ensure that all your images are at the same resolution before you start (image > resize > image size). Also, make sure that your background is not a low resolution or the final result will be printed badly little matter how long you spend combining things.

  • Is there a way to reduce the size in pixels of several pictures in a slide show?

    I have a Windows 7 computer and use Photoshop Elements 9 and first Elements 9.  I just finished a slide show containing approximately 360 pictures, much or who exceeds the maximum size of 1000 x 750 pixels.  Is it possible that I can easily reduce the pixel size of each photo?  If the upgrade to the latest versions of Photoshop Elements and Premiere Elements could help me accomplish this I'd be willing to do.  Thank you very much in advance for any advice or suggestions.

    You can batch process your images to resize them in the editor using the menu:

    File > process several files

    Place your photos selected in a separate folder, and then choose a different destination folder; in order not to overwrite the originals.

  • Reduce the size/resolution of the image but will then return to the former size when click ok

    Hello

    Hope this finds you well.

    I'm trying to reduce the size of an image to get the height according to a specific size (360 px) because it's the height of the container it will sit on the web.

    I learned to:

    -go to image/image size

    -Be sure to re - sample image is disabled

    -change the units of the size of the document to points

    -Enter the new height

    -then check out re - sample image

    -Enter the final resolution to 72 (it was 183 front)

    -Uncheck resample image and click ok

    I followed these instructions and except for once (which I can't do redo) the image will return to its original size after the last step to uncheck image re-snack.

    No idea as to what could happen and how can I solve it?

    I appreciate your time and look forward to hearing back from you soon.

    Thank you!

    You don't need to keep check / uncheck resample image.

    Leave resample image checked and enter the size in pixels in the pixel Dimensions section. Enter the resolution box - which should be 72.

  • How can I reduce the resolution of a photo I have integrate it?

    I have some pictures full-resolution images related to a (CS4) Illustrator file. They are part of a conception of flyers for my photography business.

    My problem is, because they are full resolution narrowed down to just an inch or two of the photos overall, they are very high dpi... much higher than necessary they are, I just need them to be 300 dpi.

    I send the Illustrator file to internet printing service to have my printed prospectus. This means I have to integrate the images as the upload must be a single file, there is also a size limit of 8 MB, so to get the full resolution photos on there will be no do, as the file size is greater than 40 MB.

    What I need is the way to lower the resolution, an embedded image, or to select the resolution it will be incorporated in front I integrate it.

    The only way that I can think is to load each picture in Photoshop, calculate the pixel dimensions to be 300 DPI in my flyer design, narrow it down to these dimensions, save each one in a new file, recreate a link to my photos in Illustrator for new files, stir and then delete the new files. But this seems extremely laborious, and I can't help thinking there must be a quicker way than what looks like a very common problem.

    Checking the option of transparency should help.

    I would rather turn their backs, then the pixelation, then turn. This way, you will get cleaner edges.

  • Pixel dimensions and how it differs from the size of the file

    Ihave this photographer who sends me a picture of a print document.

    There he cropped to the correct size:

    Screen Shot 2015-05-29 at 11.27.15 AM.png

    But, the image is grainy and I'm afraid it all there just resampled it. It is hung on the fact that it is of 74.6 M in this screenshot, but the file is a JPG of 10 MB. He repeats to me that image must be big enough, because he is 74.6 MB and I do not have "uncompressed" it properly.

    So my question is, how I clearly explain how the Dimensions in pixels of 74.6 M is really different from a file that is 74.6 MB in size and is not really an indication of the image quality in this case? Or am I missing something, is there a way that I have to process this file so that it is high resolution enough for printing?

    Thanks for your help!

    I really want to add to that. An easy way to see what jpeg compression is doing to an image is to enlarge your image and drag the slider down to 1 it does is "lumpy" colors together and in doing so, throwing the color information to get the size down.

    You will see the "tuft" image as the file size goes down.

    It does not change the number of pixels. If you open your file it will be 74 MB, and the pixel dimensions are the same quality 1 or 10 quality.

    But the image will be "sick" to healthy and 1 to 10. You save space, but that's what you get.

    Here's the "liquidation".  If you want to print, download a flat tiff file. In ancient times the modems and readers of 500 MB, jpeg may have made sense, but there are terabyte, DSL speeds and cloud like Dropbox storage disks. It's cheap send a uncompressed file ready to print.

  • Increase the pixel size?

    How can I increase the pixel sizes

    Hi, can you be more specific in your question? Are you trying to 'rasterize' your image like this?

    Pixellisant image:

    Go to filter > Pixelate > mosaic.

    Then increase the size of the cell to achieve your desired look.

    Or you try to increase the pixel dimensions (i.e. the size of the image)? As Silkrooster said, you would go to image > image size, as shown below.

    Increase the pixel dimensions:

    You would increase the values in the areas of pixel dimensions to enlarge the image. However, your image will not retain the quality, that he was on the smaller size. See this article for more information on this subject.

    Please let me know if you have solved your problem, or if we can offer any assistance more.

  • Is it possible to change the resolution batch, but not the size of the pixels?

    I was changing my digital photos from 180 to 300 ppi resolution individually that I retouched, but sometimes I forget. Because I need a higher resolution for printing, I decided to automate this step by using the "Process Multiple Files" of the PSE feature. I noted that the selection of the resolution was grayed out until I checked 'Resize pictures.' Given that I didn't change the number of pixels, I left these fields empty.

    When I started the automated processing, I noticed it was terribly slow, so I cancelled it and looked at the resulting files. They had more than doubled in size from the file because the PSE has been almost double the pixel Dimensions! I don't want to try a "resizing" for the pixel dimensions current workaround, because the treatment takes about 45 seconds per file, and if I have cropped the photos, the pixel dimensions vary. Is there an automated way to change only the PES resolution... quickly?

    Also, I really want to double the resolution of 180 dpi to 360 DPI, but PSE limited my choices to 300 or 600 or less. I read about Scripts, but I don't think that PSE supports. I have version 6.

    Thank you very much for the help.

    To tell you the truth, changing the resolution of your digital photos is totally meaningless.

    A digital photo that is (for example) 2000 x 3000 pixels and 180ppi is the SAME PHOTO EXACTLY as if you changed the photo of 2000 x 3000 to 300 ppi.

    So my advice to you is to don't bother to make all these changes resolution, because there is no advantage. Additional work, no advantage? I don't like the sound of that.

    The only time you need to worry about the resolution is when you print, and even then, if you say printing software you want a 4 x 6, with most of the software you will get a 4 x 6, regardless of the resolution contained in the image file.

  • The challenge to reduce the size of the PDF file export

    Hi, I recently spent from Quark to InDesign and can't find out how to reduce the size of a PDF file export.

    The file has about 200 pages with about 300 files EPS, which are about 30-40K each. The file uses less than 10 fonts, all from two families of fonts (Bembo Std and Std universe). When I created a similar to Quark file, the exported PDF file is ~ 5MG. However, when I export the file in InDesign, I created, the PDF file is 10xs more large (~ 50MG). I tried to export using the parameters of quality of printing and smaller file size, but the result was the same. (I think it's because there is no images to be compressed JPG, just files that are already tiny vector).

    If you have any suggestions for other settings check, I would be grateful for the help. Overall, other than this issue, I was very happy with InDesign.

    I'm using CS5, v 7.0.4 on Mac OS X (Snow Leopard 10.6.8)

    Thank you

    SH

    Oh yeh I thought I covered that - oops left a little.

    http://InDesignSecrets.com/Creating-smaller-PDFs-from-a-vector-dense-book.php

    It has a pretty cool thing here by using the flattener to convert vector to raster graphics.

    If you need help then just ask.

    If it's just for people online, then the vector graphics could be better as raster for online application.

  • Need to reduce the pictures - Export PDF too big

    Hello

    I am currently working on a portfolio of development on Indesign that has 50 + photos originally on my iPhone.

    On the package and looking at the PDF, the file is too large which I suppose is all attached images.

    Is it possible to decrease automatically the size of the image file in Indesign or should I resize them in Photoshop, and then place them in the Indesign document?

    See you soon.

    Export your files Indesign in Adobe PDF (Interactive) and in the Interactive dialog box, select general > Pages > check the Pages radio button and select "Compress", now in the defined Image Compression JPEG quality: "Max, high, medium, low, Minimum."

    It will help you reduce the size of the pdf file.

    Thank you

Maybe you are looking for

  • Equium L20-264: unknown device PCI after Bios Update

    Hi allI just updated the bios on my Equium L20-264 (PSL2ZE) to V1.80.After restarting windows XP has detected a new PCI device but no driver for it.Everything seems to work and all of the devices, I expected were there.The name of the device is devic

  • I don't have text very often...

    .. .but I already remember what I was typing there is words being invited to select. I do not see those more. Something has changed, or am I out of my mind?

  • Reg: DAQ module (Urgent)

    Hello We're going to design a system to measure the movement and posture of the body by using accelerometer 3 axes.To do this, we will use MMA7260Q, an acceleration sensor that consists of a single chip and even can detect information 3 - axis accele

  • Install OEM DVD

    Hello I got my pxi controller that is infected with the virus have bee comes with the controller shipped NI resettlement OEM DVD not there be problems during formatting and re-install a new operating system on my PXI controller. I got my factory of p

  • I'm not able to install automatic updates. How can I solve this problem?

    I get an error message when I try to install the automatic updates.  It says "some updates could not be installed in the header of the message.  In the retail box, it says "the following updates were not installed".  Just below this is the list of up