Failover active/active pix

Hello

First of all, thank you for your time. I have a question on a pix with 7.0 active/active failover implementation. I have two pix 535 with 3 Ethernet networks (inside, outside and failover). So far, they were in Active/pasive but I would like to implement active/active. Is it possible to do this without HAVING to install the ethernet cards more? More and more, is possible using a single context? I found this info:

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008045247e.html#wp1096075

I can it implement another way?

Sincere greetings,

Fernando

CCIE #144XX CCNP CCDP

Hello

IMHO the "active/active" is just sales talk. Cisco mean when they saids active/active in pix7 / ASA is just load balancing if you run multiple contexts of fw.

For each virtual firewall install you a physical fw as active and the other passive. If you have 4 virutal fw:s (contexts), you define A Fw as active for context 1 and 2 and B Fw as active for context 3 and 4. In this way, when a device does not work, two contexts that are active on this unit will switch to the other device.

If you run no multiple contexts in your firewall, you cannot use Active/active failover.

Sorry, it disappointed me too, when I realized...

Consider Jimmy

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • on the stateful failover active / standby

    Hello guys.

    I have two ASA, same model and material. ASA have configured stateful failover active / standby by someone a few years ago. It worked normally until recently and no one changed the configuration. Then the secondary unit can't. Ping between 2 interfaces is ok. Please help me solve this problem.

    on the main site

    interface Management0/0

    STATE failover Interface Description

    management only

    interface GigabitEthernet1/1

    Failover LAN Interface Description

    failover

    primary failover lan unit

    failover lan interface failover GigabitEthernet1/1

    The link with failover Management0/0 status

    failover failover interface ip 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 ensures 172.16.1.2

    State of the failover interface ip 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.0 ensures 172.16.0.2

    on the secondary site

    interface Management0/0

    STATE failover Interface Description

    management only

    interface GigabitEthernet1/1

    Failover LAN Interface Description

    output of the show failover on PRIMARY

    Show execution of failover

    failover

    primary failover lan unit

    failover lan interface failover GigabitEthernet1/1

    The link with failover Management0/0 status

    failover failover interface ip 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 ensures 172.16.1.2

    State of the failover interface ip 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.0 ensures 172.16.0.2

    See the resumption of F1 #.

    Failover on

    Unit of primary failover

    Failover LAN interface: GigabitEthernet1/1 failover (maximum)

    Frequency of survey unit 1 seconds, 15 seconds holding time

    Survey frequency interface 5 seconds, 25 seconds hold time

    1 political interface

    Monitored 5 256 maximum Interfaces

    Version: Our 8.2 (2), Matt 8.2 (2)

    Last failover to: 08:03:11 ULAST January 1, 2003

    This host: primary: enabled

    Activity time: 5755203 (s)

    slot 0: ASA5550 hw/sw rev (status 2.0/8.2(2)) (upward (Sys)

    Interface Backup2 (10.2.5.1): Normal (pending)

    Internet (202.131.225.90) interface: No link (pending)

    Interface Backup1 (10.3.5.1): Normal (pending)

    The interface server (192.168.227.1): Normal (pending)

    Bank interface (10.20.1.1): Normal (pending)

    Slot 1: rev hw/sw ASA-SSM-4GE-INC (State of 1.0/1.0(0)10) (top)

    Another host: secondary - failed

    Activity time: 0 (s)

    slot 0: ASA5550 hw/sw rev (status 2.0/8.2(2)) (upward (Sys)

    Backup2 (0.0.0.0) interface: no connection (pending)

    Interface (0.0.0.0) Internet: No link (pending)

    Interface (0.0.0.0) Backup1: Normal (pending)

    The interface server (0.0.0.0): Normal (pending)

    Bank interface (0.0.0.0): Normal (pending)

    Slot 1: rev hw/sw ASA-SSM-4GE-INC (State of 1.0/1.0(0)10) (top)

    Failover stateful logical Update Statistics

    Link: State Management0/0 (top)

    Stateful Obj xmit rcv rerr xerr

    General 76184539 0 767513 6

    sys cmd 767328 0 767326 1

    up time         0          0          0          0

    RPC services 0 0 0 0

    25878669 0 11 5 TCP Conn

    Conn UDP 40545710 0 40 0

    ARP 8987688 0 136 tbl 0

    Xlate_Timeout 0 0 0 0

    Tbl IPv6 ND 0 0 0 0

    VPN IKE upd 1140 0 0 0

    VPN IPSEC upd 4004 0 0 0

    VPN CTCP upd 0 0 0 0

    VPN SDI upd 0 0 0 0

    VPN DHCP upd 0 0 0 0

    SIP session 0 0 0 0

    Logical update queue information

    Heart Max Total

    Q: recv 0 7 6522961

    Xmit Q: 0 34 106685671

    output of the secondary recovery

    See the resumption of F1 #.

    Failover on

    Secondary failover unit

    Failover LAN interface: GigabitEthernet1/1 failover (maximum)

    Frequency of survey unit 1 seconds, 15 seconds holding time

    Survey frequency interface 5 seconds, 25 seconds hold time

    1 political interface

    Monitored 5 256 maximum Interfaces

    Version: Our 8.2 (2), Matt 8.2 (2)

    Last failover at: 03:36:23 ULAST December 15, 2013

    This host: secondary - failed

    Activity time: 0 (s)

    slot 0: ASA5550 hw/sw rev (status 2.0/8.2(2)) (upward (Sys)

    Backup2 (0.0.0.0) interface: no connection (pending)

    Interface (0.0.0.0) Internet: No link (pending)

    Interface (0.0.0.0) Backup1: Normal (pending)

    The interface server (0.0.0.0): Normal (pending)

    Bank interface (0.0.0.0): Normal (pending)

    Slot 1: rev hw/sw ASA-SSM-4GE-INC (State of 1.0/1.0(0)10) (top)

    Another host: primary: enabled

    Activity time: 5743217 (s)

    slot 0: ASA5550 hw/sw rev (status 2.0/8.2(2)) (upward (Sys)

    Interface Backup2 (10.2.5.1): Normal (pending)

    Internet (202.131.225.90) interface: No link (pending)

    Interface Backup1 (10.3.5.1): Normal (pending)

    The interface server (192.168.227.1): Normal (pending)

    Bank interface (10.20.1.1): Normal (pending)

    Slot 1: rev hw/sw ASA-SSM-4GE-INC (State of 1.0/1.0(0)10) (top)

    Failover stateful logical Update Statistics

    Link: State Management0/0 (top)

    Stateful Obj xmit rcv rerr xerr

    General 765518 0 35843181 874

    sys cmd 765518 0 765516 0

    up time         0          0          0          0

    RPC services 0 0 0 0

    TCP 0 0 12671303 80 Conn

    UDP 0 0 13432853 133 Conn

    ARP 0 0 8968384 661 tbl

    Xlate_Timeout 0 0 0 0

    Tbl IPv6 ND 0 0 0 0

    VPN IKE 0 0 1137 upd 0

    VPN IPSEC 0 0 3988 upd 0

    VPN CTCP upd 0 0 0 0

    VPN SDI upd 0 0 0 0

    VPN DHCP upd 0 0 0 0

    SIP session 0 0 0 0

    Logical update queue information

    Heart Max Total

    Q: recv 0 9 72011189

    Xmit Q: 0 1 765518

    You have a couple no link on your high school as well as a message no link on your primary.

    Backup2 (0.0.0.0) interface: no connection (pending)

    Interface (0.0.0.0) Internet: No link (pending)

    I recommend that you check these cables.  Don't forget that if you changed the default configuration, a failure of the single, or problems of connectivity even interface between an interface on the two ASAs fail.

    If this does not help, try entering the command interface of the monitor for the interfaces.

    --
    Please do not forget to rate and choose a good answer

  • Help about LAN-based failover active / standby on pix 7.0

    Hello

    I wonder why my status active / standby faiover having to wait. And when I do sh failover state he failed on Hello not hear talk of companion to the standby state (see attachment)

    Failover on

    Status of cable: n/a - active LAN failover

    Unit of primary failover

    Failover LAN Interface: failover GigabitEthernet1 (top)

    Frequency of survey unit 1 seconds, 3 seconds hold time

    Interface frequency of survey 15 seconds

    1 political interface

    Watched 3 Interfaces maximum 250

    failover replication http

    Last failover to: 02:39:25 MYT on April 15, 2006

    This host: primary: enabled

    Activity time: 184985 (s)

    Interface inside (10.103.1.15): Normal (pending)

    Interface to the outside (210.187.51.2): Normal (pending)

    DMZ (210.187.51.81) of the interface: Normal (pending)

    Another host: secondary - ready Standby

    Activity time: 0 (s)

    Interface (0.0.0.0) inside: Normal (pending)

    Interface (0.0.0.0) outdoors: Normal (pending)

    Interface (0.0.0.0) dmz: Normal (pending)

    Failover stateful logical Update Statistics

    Link: failover GigabitEthernet1 (top)

    Stateful Obj xmit rcv rerr xerr

    101718 General 0 419 0

    sys cmd 419 0 419 0

    time 0 0 0 0

    RPC services 0 0 0 0

    Conn 74719 TCP 0 0 0

    Conn 21655 UDP 0 0 0

    ARP tbl 4928 0 0 0

    Xlate_Timeout 0 0 0 0

    VPN IKE upd 0 0 0 0

    VPN IPSEC upd 0 0 0 0

    VPN CTCP upd 0 0 0 0

    VPN SDI upd 0 0 0 0

    VPN DHCP upd 0 0 0 0

    Logical update queue information

    Heart Max Total

    Q: recv 0 2 419

    Xmit Q: 0 2 104936

    Is there something wrong with my setup?

    I use active LAN failover / standby.

    I am attached to my firewall configuration, failover, failover state sh sh and sh story of failover.

    looking at your configs... IP addresses for the rescue unit are missing... It should read something Central this:

    interface Ethernet0

    nameif outside

    IP 209.165.201.1 255.255.255.224 watch 209.165.201.2

  • Fast-Start Failover & Active Data Guard

    Hi experts,

    I set up a 2-nodes with fast failover-Dataguard!

    While tesing the system I have seen that the backup database is to read only State (no editing).

    It means I have a watch guard of active data!

    Active data guard standby is a necessary condition to run the accelerated shift (the license is required?)

    Thanks and greetings

    hqt200475

    To be more precise: READING ONLY one OPEN does not mean that you use queries in real-time, who need the option Active Data Guard. Only if you redo apply while being read-only that is open has Active Data Guard. You can determine by the column OPEN_MODE from v$ database with11.2.

    Kind regards
    Uwe Hesse

    http://uhesse.WordPress.com

    Published by: Uwe Hesse on 25.10.2011 16:26
    Corrected an actress-> Active

  • PIX failover: failover cable disconnected and active the unit off

    Hi all

    We have 2 PIX 515E 6.3 (3) in the failover configuration (not stateful failover). Basically, the failover works very well. Recently, we did some testing of failover and had the following situation:

    When we force the active PIX failover cable is disconnected, the rest-aid box inactive and has not changed in the active state.

    It is the 'normal' behavior or is there something wrong?

    Thank you for your response.

    Daniel Ruch

    Daniel,

    As mentioned previously, the behavior you report is expected. If the failover cable is removed from a pair of PIX failover during the race, each PIX will maintain it's State as active it or standby PIX. Remove the failover cable in effect, disables the failover of both units to avoid having two devices moving to an active state.

    Does make sense? I'm still confused what about * why * you test this though. Is this something you think that will happen in your environment?

    Scott

  • ASA in transparent mode with LAN base active failover / standby?

    Is it possible to have a pair of the SAA in transparent mode with LAN-based failover active / standby? I configured the portion of failover and then configured the transparent mode and it erased my failover configuration. Is this supported configuration, and if so are there at - it an example?

    Thanks in advance

    Yes. It is possible to have a pair of ASA in transparent mode with LAN-based failover active/Standy. You must perform the configuration of failover after conversion of the appliance in transparent mode.

    I saw an example on the cisco site, but I'll give you an example of one of the projects I run. Infact its very easy to configure failover in transparent mode. Less work.

    I have listed the configs on both the firewall for your reference

    Main firewall

    ============

    interface GigabitEthernet0/0

    nameif outside

    security-level 0

    No tap

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0/1

    nameif inside

    security-level 100

    No tap

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0/2

    Shutdown

    No nameif

    no level of security

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0/3

    Failover LAN Interface Description

    !

    192.168.9.2 IP address 255.255.255.0 watch 192.168.9.7

    failover

    primary failover lan unit

    local failover FAILINT GigabitEthernet0/3 network interface

    failover abcdef keys

    failover interface ip FAILINT 172.16.9.1 255.255.255.0 watch 172.16.9.7

    The secondary firewall

    =================

    failover

    secondary failover lan unit

    local failover FAILINT GigabitEthernet0/3 network interface

    failover abcdef keys

    failover interface ip FAILINT 172.16.9.1 255.255.255.0 watch 172.16.9.7

    int GigabitEthernet0/3

    No tap

    Hope the above helps.

  • VPN works in Active Active Firewall failover mode?

    I want to clarify these two things!
    1. what VPN works in active/active mode failover mode?

    2. what failover active/Pasive mode?

    Kind regards!

    Hello

    With the help of an active/active failover means that firewalls will be in Multiple context mode. In other words the virtual firewall.

    This means that you can ONLY use the L2L IPsec VPN connections on the virtual firewall if you run level software on the firewall 9.x. Any form of Client and clientless VPN is not supported in multiple context Mode right now.

    Now with active / standby, it must make a distinction (if that is the word).

    IF you run a pair of active failover / normal standby time of ASAs IS NOT in Multiple context mode, YOU CAN use any type of VPN support ASAs.

    IF you run a pair of ASAs in several Mode of context and active / standby, you will naturally meet the limitation of VPN in Multiple Mode of context support and do WILL NOT be able to use any other VPN other than IPsec VPN L2L connections as long as you run the 9.x software that supports.

    Hope this helps

    -Jouni

  • Deleting a failover of PIX

    We have two PIX 515 currently configured in a failover. We must remove the additional pix for a few days, is there something special we have to do, or should we just unplug it and let it do its normal failover. And since we're on the subject, which would need to be done when we put the pix in. Thanks in advance.

    If you delete the previous day, just turn it off and remove it, the active PIX remains active.

    If you remove the active PIX, do a "active failover" on the day before to make it active and then turn it off.

    Remember however that if your secondary PIX is a failover only license, then it restarts every 24 hours or so if it detects that the primary is not connected. When it happens you will have to do an another "active failover" manually in this topic, that it will not automatically become the active unit. Make sure you leave the failover cable connected to this unit, otherwise it starts up at all.

  • PIX 515E failover

    I have a pair of PIX 515E (6.3) running in failover mode. They are currently connected to a single chassis base. We are upgrading our network with the heart, dual 6500's. Is there a way to connect each PIX to a separate kernel (1 PIX - Core1, PIX 2 - Core2) to allow a failure of the base?

    Core 1 and Core 2 will have a L2 link between them. If the current active PIX is connected to Core1 and Core 1 dies, this would not lead to support PIX failover. All LAN traffic would go through Core 2, but since he does not have an active path to the active PIX 1, traffic would drop. My reasoning is correct?

    Is there a way to connect the PIX to two cores running V6.3?

    Hello

    If you use the cable-based failover, you can change the basis of LAN failover.

    Read http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/pix/pix63/configuration/guide/failover.html#wp1024836

    I hope this helps.

    Best regards.

    Massimiliano.

  • PIX 515E failover restart problems

    Thursday, November 23, we went from the PIX cluster to version 7.1 (2) 6.2 (2) with the default memory (64 MB) in each PIX. The Active PIX then suffered what appeared to be leaking memory (attributed to process ARP Thread). This continued for a few days? with the result that we force reloaded the Active PIX every 8 hours to ensure the continuity of the service. Monday 27 after a reload? It has been noticed that the Active PIX leaked is more memory per process threads ARP? the same day, we went from the cluster PIX to 128 MB of memory. Then, we have had failovers active / standby every 2 hours? that seems to be attributed to missed? Hello? in the e-mail of failover? We decided then to configure LAN failover on the PIX cluster. In the process of activation of this secondary feature PIX (which was the current asset) crashed

    You have any explanation as to why these events took place.

    Hi Carlton,

    I can tell you that maybe the method you used to upgrade starts the chain of problems. I used for the migration of these products and I've never met before. In general I WINS configurations, program a service stop and I leave the unit of failover working alone while I do the upgrade of the unit the ex-active. After the upgrade, I had loaded the software configuration I saved before and made the customizations.

    For the PIX without restrictions, is real memory of 128 MB required. For the restricted permission, you can use the default of 64 MB.

    After that, you can place the active unit instead of the recovery. You improve the unit of failover so and connect again in active, already in production and restart the synchronization.

    For all my clients, it worked.

    It will be useful. If Yes, please rate.

    Kind regards

    Rafael Lanna

  • PIX failover

    We have a PIX 515e failover bundle. In the documentation, I read that the PIX failover will restart even 12 hours min. This also occur in a failover design 'ordinary '?

    If the status of the lan failover interface connection is in place:

    * The only FO PIX will start and becomes automatically active if it fails to detect the primary UR PIX.

    * The device recharges itself all 24 hours, becomes automatically active whenever.

    If the lan failover interface link status is down:

    * The only FO PIX will start and are online but not become active.

    Active failover ordering must be run manually to the active unit.

    * The device recharges itself all 24 hours, requiring another manual failover active to make it active each time.

    This is precisely why we suggest to to connect with PIX failover through a switch instead of a crossover cable.

  • PIX 6.2 (primary failover)

    I recently joined a company where the PIX firewall is installed. but the active link on the failover is red, I want to make the active primary pix. How can I do?

    There seems to be some confusion with primary, secondary, active and standby. In your scenario, it's whatever pix is 'active' who will always have the adresse.190, whether primary or secondary, and similarly, the pix "pending" will always be the adresse.180. It is the 'active' pix, you need to set up, not the "standby", as the rescue unit will not replicate the changes to the active unit, and this is the error you see. You must telnet to the 190 address in order to set up the pair.

    Hope that helps

  • ASA 5520 Active standby and ssl vpn loadbalancing

    I have a pair of Asa 5520 failover active rescue running. Can I use these two machines in a cluster of ssl vpn load balancing?

    N ° when a couple active / standby is part of a cluster of VPN, the rescue unit is still pending - she will not be actively terminate user sessions. Only the active cluster members (and non-failover) will do.

  • Activation of VPN-3Des-AES

    Hello!

    I need activate VPN-3DES-AES on an ASA5540.  See the version provided this info below.

    The devices allowed for this platform:

    The maximum physical Interfaces: unlimited

    VLAN maximum: 200

    Internal hosts: unlimited

    Failover: Active/active

    VPN - A: enabled

    VPN-3DES-AES: disabled

    Security contexts: 2

    GTP/GPRS: disabled

    VPN peers: 5000

    WebVPN peers: 2

    AnyConnect for Mobile: disabled

    AnyConnect for Linksys phone: disabled

    Assessment of Advanced endpoint: disabled

    Proxy UC sessions: 2

    This platform includes an ASA 5540 VPN Premium license.

    After doing some poking around I came across a link to apply for a free license, but when the email came, he warned that the requested license was lower than that currently assigned to the serial number provided.  I have all the old license information as this has been implemented years ago and was way before my time with the company.  Can someone point me in the right direction on how to activate the feature as well as maintaining the functions my vpn premium license.

    Thank you

    Andrew

    Hi André,.

    As far as I know, it shouldn't affect the existing license, since it is precisely for 3DES / AES.

    HTH.

    Please note all useful messages.

  • Boring for pix failover message

    Hello

    >

    > I have two firewalls of PIX525 editing just with dynamic rollover and they

    > sewing to work properly except that I'm getting the message...

    >

    > Warning, lack of ip address or the inside interface failover

    >

    > The inside interface has an ip address and I don't want to use it for

    > failover, so why I get this message?

    >

    > I'm under 6.3.4

    Hello

    When you set up failover, you must assign each ip address, interfacean @,.

    When you assign an ip @ to a failover interface, the pix continues to display decreasing message. It assumes that there is an error.

    If you must give to each interface of your pix failover ip @.

    failover ip inside everything that...

    hope this helps.

Maybe you are looking for