Failure signatures required 881 missing (COMINCO, AUTHOR)

Similar Questions

• author of the 881 failure application does not match the author token of debugging

  Hello

  I can't launch my app Android of Eclipse for the BlackBerry PlayBook.

  Error:

  Impossible to deploy the project MYPROJECT
  Info: Send request: install
  Info: Action: install
  Info: File size: 1076852
  Info: installation...
  Info: Treatment 1076852 bytes
  actual_dname:
  actual_id:
  actual_version:
  result::failure 881 the application author does not match the author token of debugging

  Thank you

  Delete the special character of the author fixed the issue.

• Tool signature indicates that "no signature not required" and the code always displays warnings "Signature required".

  Well, it's confusing!

  I signed my application with the keys and "Ask" Signature tool button a dialog box indicating "no signature not required" and I can see the status of the mandatory and optional .cod, signing as "signed". But yet when I look at the code, the code of example database, it still shows the ugly warning

  "Signature required: RIM Runtime API (0 x 52525400)": protected class net.rim.device.api.database.Database ' "

  Am I missing something?

  I don't use the plugin Eclipse of JDE. CAP can be configured to generate warnings about the need for signing - they are indeed intended to remind you that you could use APIs that are restricted, but they have nothing to do with your code is not being signed. I wonder if these are the warnings you see differently but only returned by the JDE Eclipse plug-in. In JDE, there is a check box for enable/disable these warnings for various key - there must be a similar setting somewhere in the plugin Eclipse of JDE. I believe that by default, only warnings are disabled automatically if the Signature tool is registered to receive signatures with these keys.

• Options of signature required to package the IPA

  Hi, I'm trying to compile ISO app with command-line

  ADT-package - target the ipa-test - useLegacyAOT no hideAneLibSymbols - No Yes - implementation service-profile C:/OpenSSL/bin/augmented_test_profile.mobileprovision - stores pkcs12 - keystore C:/OpenSSL/bin/iphone_dev.p12 - storepass xxxxxx ios_aug.ipa ios_aug - app.xml ios_aug.swf - ane extdir

  and adt returns an error:

  Options of signature required to package the IPA

  use:

  ADT - checkstore SIGNING_OPTIONS

  ADT-certificate - cn < name > (-UO < org - unit >)? (o < org - name >)? (-c < country >)? (- validityPeriod < years >)? 2048 - RSA < pfx file > < password >

  ADT-help

  ADT-migrate SIGNING_OPTIONS (< air-file-in > | < flown-file-in >) < fichier_resultat >

  ADT-package SIGNING_OPTIONS (-aerial target)? <>Package-output (FILE_OPTIONS < app-desc > | < input-package >)

  ADT-package SIGNING_OPTIONS-target flown < output-package > (< app-desc > FILE AND PATH OPTIONS | < input-package >)

  ADT-package - target (apk | apk-debug | emulator apk | apk-captive-runtime) (CONNECT_OPTIONS? |) LISTEN_OPTIONS? ) (- airDownloadURL < url >)? (ARCH_OPTIONS)? SIGNING_OPTIONS < output-package > (< app-desc > PLATFORM-SDK-OPTION?) FILE-AND-PATH-OPTIONS | PLATFORM-SDK-OPTION < input-package >? )

  ADT-package - target (ipa-test | ipa-debug | ipa-app-store | ipa-ad-hoc: ipa-test-interpreter | ipa-debug-interpreter | ipa-test-interpreter-Simulator | ipa-debug-interpreter-simulator) (CONNECT_OPTIONS? |) LISTEN_OPTIONS? ) (- sampler)? ANE_LINK_OPTIONS? AOT_MODE_OPTIONS? SIGNING_OPTIONS < output-package > (< app-desc > PLATFORM-SDK-OPTION?) FILE-AND-PATH-OPTIONS | PLATFORM-SDK-OPTION < input-package >? )

  ADT-package SIGNING_OPTIONS? -target native SIGNING_OPTIONS? <>Output-package (< app-desc > FILE AND PATH OPTIONS | < input-package >)

  ADT-package SIGNING_OPTIONS? -migrate SIGNING_OPTIONS-target native SIGNING_OPTIONS? OPTION-PATH < output-package > < app-desc > FILE_OPTIONS

  ADT-package SIGNING_OPTIONS? -bundle target SIGNING_OPTIONS? <>Output-package (< app-desc > FILE AND PATH OPTIONS | < input-package >)

  ADT-package SIGNING_OPTIONS? -target the donkey < output-package > < ext-desc > ANE_OPTIONS

  ADT-prepare < airi-file > < app-desc > FILE_AND_PATH_OPTIONS

  ADT-sign SIGNING_OPTIONS (-target (air: flown | ane))? (< airi-file > | < unsigned-ane-file >) < fichier_resultat >

  ADT-devices OPTION of platform PLATFORM-SDK-OPTION?

  ADT - installRuntime OPTION of platform PLATFORM-SDK-OPTION? DEVICE OPTION? (- < apk file > package)?

  ADT - installApp OPTION of platform PLATFORM-SDK-OPTION? DEVICE OPTION? -package < apk file. IPA-file >

  ADT - uninstallRuntime OPTION of platform PLATFORM-SDK-OPTION? DEVICE OPTION?

  ADT - uninstallApp OPTION of platform PLATFORM-SDK-OPTION? DEVICE OPTION? -appid < app - id >

  ADT - launchApp {OPTION of platform PLATFORM-SDK-OPTION? DEVICE OPTION? (port - debuggerPort)? -appid < app id >}

  ADT - runtimeVersion OPTION of platform PLATFORM-SDK-OPTION? DEVICE OPTION?

  ADT - appVersion OPTION of platform PLATFORM-SDK-OPTION? DEVICE OPTION? -appid < app - id >

  ADT-version

  SIGNING_OPTIONS:-< type > stores (-< store > keystore)? (- storepass < pass >)? (- alias < aliasName >)? (- keypass < pass >)? (- providerName < name >)? (- tsa < url >)? (- service-profile <>layout)?

  FILE_OPTIONS: < fileOrDir > * ((C-< dir >< fileOrDir > +) |) (-e < file > < path >)) *

  ARCH_OPTIONS:-arch (armv7 | x 86)

  CONNECT_OPTIONS:-connect < host >

  LISTEN_OPTIONS:-listening < port >

  ANE_LINK_OPTIONS:-hideAneLibSymbols (yes | no)

  ANE_OPTIONS:-CFC < EFA > (-platform < name > (-platformoptions < file >). < fileOrDir > * (C - < dir > < fileOrDir > +) *) *.

  FILE-AND-PATH-OPTIONS: (OPTION-PATH |) FILE - OPTIONS) - AND-PATH-FILE OPTIONS?

  OPTION: PATH - extdir < dir >

  Platform-OPTION:-platform (android: ios)

  PLATFORM-SDK-OPTION:-platformsdk < platform-sdk-home-dir >

  OPTION: DEVICE-device (deviceID | ios simulator)

  AOT_MODE_OPTIONS:-useLegacyAOT (yes | no)

  what Miss me?

  found the issue in adt switch positions - hideAneLibSymbols Yes, then - useLegacyAOT not

  full order adt: adt-package - target the ipa-test - useLegacyAOT no hideAneLibSymbols - No Yes - implementation service-profile C:/OpenSSL/bin/augmented_test_profile.mobileprovision - stores pkcs12 - keystore C:/OpenSSL/bin/iphone_dev.p12 - storepass xxxxxx ios_aug.ipa ios_aug - app.xml ios_aug.swf - ane extdir

• xpinstall.signature.Required false but firefox is still blocking the pentadactyl plugin to be installed

  Hello everyone, I have ' tries to install the plugin pentadactyl (Ref: http://5digits.org/nightlies) , but Firefox keeps blocking because it is not signed. About: config variable xpinstall.signatures.required is set to False, what else am I missing?

  Thank you very much

  Addon signature is applied in firefox since version 48 release - mentioned preference is no longer in use: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Addons/Extension_Signing

  If you want to run unsigned addons please use rather developer edition of firefox: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Developer_Edition

• The index.xml file required is missing. Cannot open documents. 10.10.5 sys

  The index.xml file required is missing. Cannot open documents. 10.10.5 sys

  You have two versions of installed Pages, where the Pages ' 09 document format use it internal document index.xml, and all Pages v5 releases use a different document format that does not incorporate the index.xml file. If you have Pages ' 09 running without window, and double-click a v5 document Pages, you will get a Pages ' 09 dialog box indicating that the index.xml file is missing.

  Exit Pages ' 09 and then double click on the document to open correctly in your version of v5 Pages.

• SQLite signature required

  I try to connect database sqlite. I gave this warning. It's not just signalling of error.

  Signature required: RIM Runtime API (0 x 52525400): class net.rim.device.api.system.CodeModuleManager protected

  Is how important it? If it is, how can I fix this?

  If you run the application on a real device then your application must be signed.  on the Simulator, there is no need to sign your application.

• I get this error message when I try to install "the resources required are missing" what is this all?

  I get this error message when I try to install "the resources required are missing" what is this all?

  I've had photoshop for years, it has stopped working last week - I think he suggested I have try to reinstall so I uninstalled and when I try to reinstall is give me this error message!

  "Required resources" that is that all?

  The product is not tested on the operating system you are using, so it may or may not work on it.

  I suggest you to upgrade to creative cloud and use the latest Adobe Photoshop CC 2015. See, Lightroom and Photoshop | Plan of creative photography of cloud of Adobe

• Patch 4247037 required component missing oracle.sdo.locator, 11.2.0

  Hi Hussein & Srini,
  
  You need help again once. After installation 11.2.0.3 software x86_64 (files 1of7.zip and 2of7.zip of patch 10404530) & run the example setup...
  part of upgrading the version of database Vision of 11.1.0.7 to 11.2.0.3 EBS 12.1.1 according to [837570.1 ID] and MOS Doc 1058763.1 }
  
  I followed the steps mentioned in http://chavalis.blogspot.in/2012/10/upgrading-r12-11-vision-database.html#! /2012/10/upgrading-R12-11-vision-database.html
  
  When I try to apply it patch 4247037 get this error... Please advise..
  
  [oracle@ebs ~] $ echo $ORACLE_HOME
  /Oracle/vis/DB/tech_st/11.1.0
  
  
  [oracle@ebs ~] $ /oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/11.2.0.3/OPatch/opatch applies/home/oracle/4247037
  
  
  Patch 4247037 : Required or missing components: [oracle.sdo.locator, 11.2.0.3.0]
  [April 6, 2013 02:36:25] [Error during the prerequisite to apply phase] Detail: YES - 67074:ApplySession failed when prior checks: checking prerequisites 'CheckApplicable' failed.
  [April 6, 2013 02:36:25] YES - 67035:System intact, OPatch will not try to restore the system
  [Apr 6, 2013 2:36:25 AM] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  [April 6, 2013 02:36:25] The following warnings occurred during execution of OPatch:
  [April 6, 2013 02:36:25] 1) YES - 67620:Interim patch 4247037 is a superset of the patches [4247037] in the House of the Oracle
  [Apr 6, 2013 2:36:25 AM] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  [April 6, 2013 02:36:25] Finishing ApplySession on sat APR 06 02:36:25 GMT + 05:30 2013
  [April 6, 2013 02:36:25] Total time spent waiting for user input is 0 seconds. Finish at Sat Apr 06 02:36:25 GMT + 05:30 2013
  [April 6, 2013 02:36:25] Location of the log file: /oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/11.1.0/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2013-04-06_02-36-18AM.log
  [April 6, 2013 02:36:25] Description of the battery: oracle.opatch.PrereqFailedException: Prerequisites check 'CheckApplicable' failed.
  [April 6, 2013 02:36:25] StackTrace: oracle.opatch.OPatchSessionHelper.runApplyPrereqs(OPatchSessionHelper.java:4835)
  [April 6, 2013 02:36:25] StackTrace: oracle.opatch.ApplySession.processLocal(ApplySession.java:3888)
  [April 6, 2013 02:36:25] StackTrace: oracle.opatch.ApplySession.process(ApplySession.java:5853)
  [April 6, 2013 02:36:25] StackTrace: oracle.opatch.OPatchSession.main(OPatchSession.java:1787)
  [April 6, 2013 02:36:25] StackTrace: oracle.opatch.OPatch.main(OPatch.java:651)
  
  
  
  Could not understand even after going the Readme in the patch... Do I need to set the Oracle_Home new Oracle_home to /oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/11.2.0.3 because it is not specifically mentioned
  in the Readme of the Patch or http://chavalis.blogspot.in/2012/10/upgrading-r12-11-vision-database.html#! 2012/10/upgrading-R12-11-vision-database.html...
  Or maybe I couldn't do... Please suggest
  
  
  Thank you
  Priya
  
  Published by: 971054 on April 5, 2013 14:39

  Patching component oracle.sdo.locator, 11.2.0.3.0...
  4247037 patch applied successfully
  Location of the log file: /oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/11.2.0.3/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2013-04-06_03-07-37AM.log

  OPatch succeeded.

  This indicates that the hotfix has been applied with success - you can also confirm the same by issuing the command "opatch lsinventory.

  I don't know if it's the right way to do it. as a parameter the ORACLE_HOME to the new is not mentioned in the Readme of the Patch file
  Or certainly I could not understand... Please suggest

  As you have downloaded the patch for 11.2.0.3 you need to set your ORACLE_HOME to the 11.2.0.3 a. And the Readme of the fix for the 11.2.0.3 version clearly indicates (Product Version #: 11.2.0.3)-https://updates.oracle.com/Orion/Services/download?type=readme&aru=14211388

  Thank you
  Hussein

• Last updated top 40 Pages causes "the index.xml file required is missing."

  I just upgraded to 4.1 Pages, and now I can't open my existing files.  "The required index.xml file is missing."

  See if this explanation by PeterBreis0807 helps you

  The required index.xml file is missing from the Pages how to solve

• "" Windows 7 SP1 - error Code: 0x800F0A12 "one or more components of the system service pack requires are missing.

  I tried to install windows 7 SP1 and I got this error:

  "One or more system components that require the service pack are missing. For more information, click on the link below. »

  I tried everything but to no avail. Reinstall my OS is not an option.

  Thank you!

  I think I'll skip this...

  Answer yourself, but please be aware that there will come a point in the not-too-distant future where the computer will not be offered new updates of Windows unless & until that SP1 is installed.

  Free unlimited installation and compatibility support is available for any questions related to the Service Packs of Windows 7. Availability of support chat, telephone or electronic mail differs depending on your location. Some questions may require more support to there have advanced a charge: https://support.microsoft.com/oas/default.aspx?&gprid=14496&&st=1&wfxredirect=1&sd=gn

  Welcome & thank you for your comments.

• new call taskflow - required child missing in call workflow element

  When you add a new 'call taskflow' to a taskflow, the 'child required missing in call workflow element' warning.
  
  I don't know how to solve this problem. I have attached the control flow to and from a page fragment.

  Hello

  This refers valid task call flow

      
        /WEB-INF/called-task-flow.xml
        called-task-flow
      
  

  I guess that yours is missing the element

  Frank

• I have a WIndows 7 Ultimate operating system failure and required a drive for a clean install. I have the product key, but Microsoft offers no English option.

  I have a Windows 7 Ultimate active computer that was swarming (STRONGLY) of malware/virus/junk files/adware...

  I think I have cleaned out, but want to do a clean to be sure install, but I have no partition recovery (may be erased by a virus?) and no recovery dick.

  I went to the Microsoft website and entered my product key.  He has been recognized as Windows 7 Ultimate, but when I had to choose a language, English was not available.

  Any solution, or should I continue to use the computer and all hope is clean?

  EDIT - I installed the windows 10 (using an ISO image) on Windows 7.  I do not enter the product key when asked (the program said I could jump at this stage of the installation).  Installation went well.

  I then checked to activate Windows 10 - it activated without any difficulty.

  I will now try a clean install...

  For 5 years, Microsoft made it fairly easy for users of the Windows 7 operating system to get reinstall media. If you have lost your support disc or installation retail collection; either it has been damaged or defective; You can download a copy of the edition that you have licensed from a membership site called Digital River. More recently, Microsoft ended the availability to reinstall media that you can download as a. File ISO in Digital River, which is a digital reproduction of an optical disc.

  It was particularly convenient for people who could not easily get the manufacturer's recovery media, did not want to pay the fees required to get or preferred a clean configuration without the software packaged manufacturers or even a recovery partition does not work. It's easy to use, all you had to do was reinstall and reactivate using the product key located on the certificate of authenticity and download all the drivers on the manufacturers website.

  Given that this option is no longer available, what are your options? See the article for more details:

  How to: What are my options for Windows 7 reinstall media?

• Key signature required information

  Hi all

  I'm working on BlackBerry. I have not much idea about signing keys.

  I fill out the form and pay 20USD for Signature keys. Hope they will send in a few days.

  In fact, I work as a team so we all members of the team can use signature keys on our systems.

  or must be purchased separately for each. and how many times I can assign to applications.

  Thanks for your replies.

  as far as I know, they are limited to a single machine (by license, and not by the system).

  If you sign all on this machine, it should be good, but I suggest that you read the license agreement.

• 2nd signature required is not requested for: document finalised after the first signature!

  We are VERY DISAPPOINTED that it is obviously not more direct support of this product, or is phone - this not correct? If so, we don't remember this change notification.

  Speaking of which, without any alteration to a form of signature which includes three steps: 1) Prefil, 2) all the information and signed by the client and 3) countersign date by us and all of a sudden after working for months, he comes back and is supposed to be completed once step 2 is completed. There is no way later to fill the countersignature. I checked that the fields are still reported as such, but very recently, the third stage (without date or signature even filled) ends from step 2 is done. Something is broken and it is apparently not possible to get immediate assistance from Adobe on this.

  Things change suddenly in the way that documents are processed without warning advanced e-mail, then suddenly things break and there is nobody to contact directly for assistance. It turns out that if we go back to the classic shape everything works fine because you still have the box "I have need to sign. The 'new' shape (of shit) said anything about it? NO! Instead, he proposed adding a "me" and various other areas, with absolutely no explanation of what they are and how they are supposed to work!  Thank you, Adobe, make the new procedure so obvious and undocumented. NOT.  I should send you a bill for all the time spent trying to figure this on my own because of the absence of any reasonable support more. You are a paper company, but you seem unable to adequately document your own products. Taking the human support was a horrible move on your part - it could have been resolved in 5-10 minutes. In any case, it is marked and done and resolved and I hope and pray I will never work on a question like that again. You're just better not take the classic option.