Hi my image (#88692521) is significantly smaller than announced can you help me to provide the correct format? Thank you

Similar Questions

• Adobe starter edition has the photo of the image as DSCO0283 number. JPG, where can I find this number on the photos in PHOTOSHOP ELEMENTS 12 - reason being that photoshop elements will not convert my catalogue in version 12. If I had this number I neck

  Adobe starter edition has the photo of the image as DSCO0283 number. JPG, where can I find this number on the photos in PHOTOSHOP ELEMENTS 12 - reason being that photoshop elements will not convert my catalogue in version 12. If I had this number that I could manually reconstruct that my collections in photoshop 12 items, but everything I see in photoshop elements is dates and I have several images from the same dates. Help! I have

  Hello

  If you look at the thumbnails in the Organizer, try going into the menu display and check that the Details and file names are checked. The name of the file and the date must appear below each thumbnail. If they do not appear, you may need to increase the size of the thumbnail using the slider to zoom (lower-right).

  Good luck

  Brian

• Media encode more than 7.0 does not recongnise SD images with the correct format of the pixels

  Hello

  I logged this bug with Adobe last year, but even through the last versions else bug and is a real problem for everyone editing in SD via first Pro CC.

  Effectvely when you create a PAL in sequence to breast of first Pro CC using SD 720 x 576 pixels (4:3) you have 2 options to export, the queue or export. If you export the images directly from the application of PP in MPEG2 SD, then the resulting files are perfect, however if you use the option queue and send to Media Encoder then the resulting files are misinterpreted and subsequently file looks like crushed. I suspect that the Media Encoder is defaulting to square pixels and not 1.09xx which is the default for PAL 4:3 SD

  The issue only began on Media Encoder version 7.1 but I also checked 7.2 and it still has the bug.

  I can't believe that's not making a lot of people and its takes so long to solve. Adobe at the time acknowledged the problem but did not provide a time scale to repair.

  If anyone has the words of wisdom, I'd love to hear from you. Maybe I'm missing a simple workaround solution? That could be just export and NO queue, but because I use the batch function a lot is not always viable.

  Thank you

  
  Steve

  And I already have a workaround for this one:

  1. open the preferences of SOUL

  2. turn off the power "import of the sequences in native mode.

  I don't know yet why the native path is ruin, but this will get you fixed up without having to re - interpret each source file.

  Tom

• Saving images in photoshop in the correct format

  Hello

  I'm working on a fairly large document in indesign cs5.5 (100 pages) and I place all the images that I need in the document and don't know what format I have to save the images and more. I've always learned to save to an eps or tif file because jpg is a lossy format. Designers more and more that I'm talking to say they're saving their images in JPG because of the size of the files, etc., that I understand if you have a large document. Any recommendations?

  I created a guestbook of astrophotography, a few years ago.

  It has about 100 images full pages.  My master files are 16-bit/channel PSDs, but when you work on the layout of book itself using Microsoft Word, I used JPEG 300 ppi images, recorded at a high quality level, for pages 10 x 12 inches.  Individual JPEGs were on average only 3 megabytes and change.

  Even in JPEG the document done if large as Publisher (Springer) actually threw it back to me, arguing their desktop computers "were not at the height of the opening of a 340 MB file".  They demanded a version with images to HALF of this DPI value for the purposes of the review and drafting of the comments.  I was floored - it's no editor of small-name!  But I complied reluctantly, and he did a little more work for me that I had to replace each of the images.

  He is found to have consequences.

  I'll give you three guesses as to which version they tried and VERY NEARLY used to the final publication, and you won't need two of them.

  By my own efforts HEROIC beyond, eliminating the editor as the intermediary and find a way to speak directly to the printer in India, I was able to get the right images printed in the final version.  Even then, it took 4 tries before they got each of them is good.

  Moral of the story: think about who will receive this document and maybe even ask them what they need.

  -Christmas

• When I try to open CC or LR my completely computer summer freezes.  He worked less than a week ago when I finally used the computer.  Thanks, Chuck

  one

  I would advise you to contact the customer service where the agent can remotely on your machine and help you solve the problem.

  * Be sure to stay connected with your Adobe ID before accessing the link above *.

• Small question. Can you recommend the appropriate software I can do motion graphics work? I am a dancer and want to make visual representations of our movement. I found a ted video and if you look at the specific 3 minutes 15 seconds of the video.

  Here's that video I was talking about:

  YouTube.com/Watch?Feature=youtu.be & v = L8fHca3NWeQ

  I have good experience as a photographer. Comfortable with photoshop and first. And I want to learn new software. I appreciate some guidance here.

  As I said before, æ is your most profitable and powerful solution. Everything that you saw in a movie that has animated graphics or composition can be accomplished with AE.

  Nuke, Houdini, or any other professional solutions vary from slightly more expensive way more expensive. If you do not go to work for a Visual effects House that does not specifically something like Nuke so I spent my time to learn AE.

  Here's a quick example of movements using motion tracking AE. Real amateur stuff, but I think that's what you're looking for.

• The Lightroom export file size: why it's so small? How can I maximize the picture quality?

  My image file size is much smaller after editing and export through Lightroom. It is impossible to maintain the size of the original file in order to preserve image quality? This small file size will have a negative impact on the prints? Any help is appreciated!

  The file size is not an indicator of picture quality! You are looking at the wrong measure.

  File size is determined by the number of pixels you have, the quality slider in the dialog box export and of a dozen other things, most of which you cannot control.

  Want to watch the number of pixels (width and height) and not the size of the file.

  It is impossible to maintain the size of the original file in order to preserve image quality?

  Not only is impossible, that it is also meaningless (see above)

  This small file size will have a negative impact on the prints?

  Instead look at the size of the file, you must look at the number of pixels of the exported photo (width and height), and this will determine if you get a decent impression. The usual standard is that you need 300 pixels per inch.

• I am on a new computer with windows 10 it won't beyond a raw im image Photoshop cs6 can someone help me?

  I am on a new computer with windows 10 it won't beyond a raw im image Photoshop cs6 can someone help me?

  I got it thank you very much, there was an update I've not seen

• I have five-point-something Lightroom thing set up on a laptop and a desktop Apple computer. Both will import images from a CD or a DVD (I have my film scanned and the images on a disk). I can't change the images on the Mac, but I can edit images on the P

  I have five-point-something Lightroom thing set up on a laptop and a desktop Apple computer. Both will import images from a CD or a DVD (I have my film scanned and the images on a disk). I can't change the images on the Mac, but I can edit images on the PC. What is going on? Also, when I try to export edited disk images, where are they going? I can't find them on my hard drive. Thank you!

  Your entire development is off? You may be able to disconnect and reconnect. You can check this thread for more suggestions:

  Lightroom 5.5 'develop module is disabled. Please renew your membership to reactivate the develop module.

  I was expecting an error message indicating that the development module is disabled, however. If this isn't what you're talking about, please show us a screenshot of the 'dark' buttons

  Mike

• In editing in the browser can create you new text boxes and images or can you only replace pre-existing text/images?

  Editing in the browser can you create new areas of text and images in your muse site? Or can you only replace pre-existing text/images?

  You can only replace the existing content, do not change the structure of the page. See the respective help sections.

  Mylenium

• How to resize the print size of an item within my PDF to multiple pages? For example a receipt or another image that can scan in bigger or smaller than my 8.5 x 11 Bill?

  How to resize the print size of an item within my PDF to multiple pages? For example a receipt or another image that can scan in bigger or smaller than my 8.5 x 11 Bill?

  Hello

  In the print dialog box, you would get options to resize your document.

  Try them and see if that helps.

  Once you choose the print option, it would give options to change the size of the page you need.

  Please check and see if it suits you or not.

  Concerning

  Sukrit diallo

• Panoramic of document while smaller than the canvas image?

  Hello

  In normal display tabbed mode, whenever the zoom level is smaller than the canvas size, it seems that the Pan is not allowed. I had actually fallen on for Photoshop CC workaround before that, but he had lost the info after a re - install. I have for the panorama as shown with a screen of small image with just the SPACEBAR button before that.

  Can someone show me how to do this again? Maybe some parameters of its file change or something?

  If update or download photoshop cc2014.2.0, there is a new preference that allows to enable/disable the module

  

• Smaller than the actual brush, PS CC 2015 (brush and eraser) cursor help!

  PC specs and hardware:

  Windows 8, Photoshop CC 2015, Creative Cloud 2015, Intuos 3 tablet, 1920 x 1080 display

  I've updated for Creative just a couple of hours there are clouds and have been satisfied with the frustrations without end.

  Most of the questions I resolved or can live with, but is not one of these.

  

  In my image, the circle at the bottom has a selection rectangle (which is supposed to be my brush cursor, but when I screen cap it disappears) indicating the size of the cursor, but the cleared area is significantly greater than the slider. I messed up round in 'Sliders' options, but none of those who have had no effect.

  I'll try to be as helpful as possible as well as to answer the questions.

  (In addition, tips to make my windows not as big tool?) I have messed with the user interface in the menu options, but that is all fucked up too.)

  Size slider should show the range including any flag.

  Your screenshot is 1920 x 1080, but for some reason it looks like it has triggered the IU 200%.  Is it perhaps a little notebook?  Set it to 100% like below, and you will have more space, but obviously with more small fonts and icons

  

• Image jpeg files too small shot of Canon 6 d

  Canon 6 d only recently started to get incredibly small image files. When the large jpeg option, which should produce 20 MB files, the results are now between 5 MB and 4 MB image files. Jpeg image of small and medium-sized settings are also much smaller than what they should be. The problem does not affect the RAW settings.

  I formatted the SD card and reset the camera settings without a bit of luck.

  Everyone knows it / give me advice?

  Not that I shoot jpg, but you never never have 20 MB jpg of your 6 d? Perhaps at the highest ISO in a dark place.

• Whenever we start to use our computer, the screen goes black and the message 'Auto adjust is in Prgress'. Then, all of our screen is small and all the icons and pages are smaller than before.

  original title: Auto Adjust

  Hello.

  Whenever we start to use our computer, the screen goes black and the message 'Auto adjust is in Prgress'. Then, all of our screen is small and all the icons and pages are smaller than before.

  I tried restoring the system that works and that gets our screen back to normal but every day that this Auto setting is coming and we can't seem to stop it.

  Any help would be appreciated... Thank you

  Try this:

  Go to the Web site of the manufacturer of your laptop computer-graphics/computer card > drivers and downloads Section > key in your model number > look for the latest Vista drivers > download/install them.

  Then:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-AU/Windows-Vista/change-screen-resolution

  Change the screen resolution

  Screen resolution refers to the clarity of the text and images on your screen. At higher resolutions, items appear sharper. They appear also smaller, so more items adapted to the screen. At lower resolutions, fewer items adapted to the screen, but they are larger and easier to see. At very low resolutions, however, images may have serrated edges.

  See you soon.

  Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner