Smaller than the actual brush, PS CC 2015 (brush and eraser) cursor help!

PC specs and hardware:

Windows 8, Photoshop CC 2015, Creative Cloud 2015, Intuos 3 tablet, 1920 x 1080 display

I've updated for Creative just a couple of hours there are clouds and have been satisfied with the frustrations without end.

Most of the questions I resolved or can live with, but is not one of these.

Untitled-2.png

In my image, the circle at the bottom has a selection rectangle (which is supposed to be my brush cursor, but when I screen cap it disappears) indicating the size of the cursor, but the cleared area is significantly greater than the slider. I messed up round in 'Sliders' options, but none of those who have had no effect.Untitled-.png

I'll try to be as helpful as possible as well as to answer the questions.

(In addition, tips to make my windows not as big tool?) I have messed with the user interface in the menu options, but that is all fucked up too.)

Size slider should show the range including any flag.

Your screenshot is 1920 x 1080, but for some reason it looks like it has triggered the IU 200%.  Is it perhaps a little notebook?  Set it to 100% like below, and you will have more space, but obviously with more small fonts and icons

Tags: Photoshop

Similar Questions

  • size smaller than the smallest brush, you can choose?

    is it possible to have the smaller than the smallest brush size, which you can choose? BTW should be smaller size of the brush to choose.

    Hi all

    The latest version of animate CC allows to choose from a wide range of sizes of brush along with other improvements

    See here: new feature summary (June and August 2016)

    Improvements to the Brush tool in animate CC

    Download latest update CC animate via Creative Cloud application and try it!

  • Photoshop brush strokes are much smaller than the slider, need to do the same thing.

    My photoshop brush, pencil and duplicate tracks are smaller than the slider, making it very difficult for accuracy. Do not know what made them change, but you want the slider and the strokes are the same.

    Stroke.jpg

    I tried different settings in the dialog box of the brushes, with parameters of advanced differenc, etc., without any result. Also, tried different settings of the preferences/slider. No luck.

    Help!

    In the preferences (cmd-k) > cursors > painting, the parameter sliders should be Normal.

    'Reset tools' as described in the habit of posting 1 help. Have you tried yet?

    Gene

  • "this computer's hard drive is smaller than the original hard drive shipped.

    Computer model: p7-1058uk Hi, I'm trying to reinstall my windows recovery kit 7 I bought from best2serve my OCZ Vertex 60 GB ssd Series 3. But I get this error message "this computer's hard drive is smaller than the original supplied hard disk. The recovery process cannot continue"I actually managed to install this recovery on the same front drive kit when I bought first. Any ideas as to why its not working now? I have formatted the ssd drive, deleted the partition and creates a new one with a program called gparted. I can't access my computer until I can reinstall this recovery again kit. Thank you

    Hello:

    I'm surprised that the same recovery disks set worked the first time.  Unfortunately, the error you are getting is the norm. I don't know any solution other than to get a bigger hard drive to the approximate size as the original.

    I have a solution for you if you want to use...

    If you can read the product key 25 character Windows 7 on the sticker COST Microsoft on your PC, you can download single files Windows 7 ISO to burn it to a DVD for the version of windows (Pro, home) that is installed on your PC, and which is listed on the sticker COST Microsoft on the PC.

    You must also select the language installation provided with your PC, or the product key will not work.

    Burn the ISO with the option to burn the ISO on your DVD burning program and burn it at the slowest possible speed that will allow your program.

    Use the 25-character product key to activate the installation. It's good for the 32-bit or 64-bit version of W7.

    Then go to the support page and drivers for your PC install the drivers you need.

    Link to downloads ISO of W7 is below.

    http://www.mydigitallife.info/official-Windows-7-SP1-ISO-from-Digital-River/

    Paul

  • Panoramic of document while smaller than the canvas image?

    Hello

    In normal display tabbed mode, whenever the zoom level is smaller than the canvas size, it seems that the Pan is not allowed. I had actually fallen on for Photoshop CC workaround before that, but he had lost the info after a re - install. I have for the panorama as shown with a screen of small image with just the SPACEBAR button before that.

    Can someone show me how to do this again? Maybe some parameters of its file change or something?

    If update or download photoshop cc2014.2.0, there is a new preference that allows to enable/disable the module

  • new cDAQ-9178 chassis was smaller than the cDAQ-9172 old buffer?

    Digital waveform features:

    Waveform acquisition (DI) FIFO for cDAQ-9172: 2047 samples

    Waveform acquisition (DI) FIFO for cDAQ-9178: 127 samples per slot

    This means that the new HW (9178) has a much smaller than the old buffer (9172)!

    I want to run a correlation over generation/acquisition at 2 MHz with 2000 samples. Does this mean that the new chassis will not be able to acquire the whole of the data (I use a NI 9401 module inside the chassis)?

    FIFO sizes are misleading and not a true indicator of the chassis supporting the streaming is not the single buffer.  We did some tests comparing the latest and cDAQ-9172 chassis.  You will not notice the difference, especially with your application to a finished task of 2 000 samples at 2 MHz.  With 2 000 samples, you can run your DI task on your chassis cDAQ-9178 at 10 MHz if you wanted without problem (don't try with continuous or even finished tasks).

    The only time where the FIFO size really comes into play is when you run a primary task at high rates, say > 5 MHz, even if it is system dependent.  At these speeds a FIFO that is deeper 2 000 samples you buy only tens or hundreds of additional microseconds when Windows jitter is measured in milliseconds.

    I would be very surprised if there is a practical application that worked on a cDAQ-9172 chassis which did not work on newer USB cDAQ chassis.

  • The buffer is smaller than the specified size.

    Has done a session of webniar via GoToWebinar, that has been saved as a Windows Media audio/video file. It has been downloaded to my desktop without problem, and the original file plays on Windows Media player. I need to send the session recorded with colleagues across the Canada. It's a big file to 55.5 MB, I usually use YouSendIt.com and have done so successfully with the same type of files in the recent past. This time, when I send the file and download it via YouSendIt, it records on my desk in a 55.5 MB file with the correct file name, but when I try to open this file, I get an error message: "the buffer is smaller than the specified size. Any ideas on what may be the problem. How this can be solved?

    Best regards

    Deborah

    I do not have the fix for YouSendIt, but it may be worth trying to
    Download your file on SendSpace... then just send download
    link to your recipients and they can download the file to their
    own convenience.

    "SendSpace.
    http://www.sendspace.com/

    It's very simple... of the SendSpace site steps
    are just what you have to do.

    On the left, click on the Browse button and it will open a window which
    allows you to access the files on your hard drive.

    Go to your video file and select it.

    On the left, click on the download button.

    When the download link appears... left click on the copy button.

    Share this link with your recipients.

  • The screen is smaller than the size of the screen. Help!

    I hit a button on an accident (CTRL with Shift or CTRL with something else) and the screen went black. Now, the screen size is much much smaller than the size of the screen. There is a good inch margin 2 right and left. How can I return the screen to normal size (to match the screen)?

    Hi Rhamad,

    Thank you for visiting Windows Vista Microsoft answers forum.

    Your monitor settings have been changed, and you must set its value by default. To set the default settings screen, you must use the buttons near the power of the monitor buttons. You can take the help of the manufacturer of your computer to do or if any manual was provided with the computer then you can refer to that as well.

    You also try to open graphics settings and change the display settings.

    To change the display settings, follow the steps below:

    1. the right in the empty space on the desktop and select Properties.

    2. click on the settings tab.

    3. click on advanced.

    4. click on the tab on your computer graphics card.

    5. you will need to make changes in the advanced settings under display settings.

    Alternatively, you can perform a system restore to a date when the display settings were normal.

    To restore the operating system to an earlier point in time, follow these steps:

    1. Click Start, type system restore in the search box, and then click System Restore in the list programs.
    If you are prompted for an administrator password or a confirmation, type your password or click on continue.

    2. in the System Restore dialog box, click on choose a different restore point and then click Next.

    3. in the list of restore points, click a restore point created before you started having the problem, and then click Next.

    4. click on finish.

    You can visit the link to the KB Article for reference:
    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/936212

    Please let us know if it helps.

    Thank you and best regards,
    David

  • Problem w / window size is smaller than the size of the screen

    I recently had an automatic installation of Vista sp.  Don't know what version/sp.  After restarting my laptop, the window size is now smaller than the window size of the screen.  It looks like HD video with a 1 1/2 in. vertical black band on the left and right side of the screen.  How can I fix it?

    Hello

    Have you tried to adjust the resolution in the settings of the Control Panel/customize / display? If there is only limited adjustments available, you will probably need to reinstall or update your graphics card driver. This is best done with a download of the manufacturer of the device, not windows update. Good luck, Rick Rogers, aka "Crazy" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com Windows help - www.rickrogers.org

  • Configurator error 'the hard size in the first string of RAID must be smaller than the drive selected in the second Raid channel'

    Hello, I hope this is the forum for this question rigth.

    I am trying to set up a new T330 for one of our customers, and I want to use a Raid 1 + Raid 1 configuration. First raid for the operating system and daily backups, second raid for a database.

    I tried the C15c configuration, but I always get the error "the size of the hard drive in the first RAID channel must be smaller than the selected hard drive in the second Raid channel".

    Is it really necessary to buy an SSD that is bigger than the HD used in the first Raid? The DSS may be relatively low, but I need more space for the backup.

    Is there an alternative solution to this?

    Thanks in advance,

    Stefan

    Yes. In fact, you can mix drive types on the SAME channel... they just cannot be mixed in the same virtual disk (table).

  • The android app icon is smaller than the native applications on Dev Alpha

    It is somehow related to http://supportforums.blackberry.com/t5/Android-Runtime-Development/apk2bar-resizes-the-app-icon-to-8...

    However, even if I have difficulty icon resized, changing the bar produce and pack a 150 x 150 icon, on DevAlpha (10.0.9.388) the icon looks like smaller than the icon of a native application (if WebWorks or Cascades). I also used the setting - os to target only the BB 10 but without results.

    Is there something that I need to specify the apk2bar command?

    Thanks for your help.

    This has been fixed in DevAlpha 10.0.9.1103.

  • Why is my file size "Combined PDF" smaller than the original files?

    Hello!

    I try to combine two individual PDF files into a single PDF file. Each file is 32 MB, but when I use acrobat to combine, the newly created "combined" file is only 19 MB. I think I took the necessary steps to ensure no degradation that happens (e.g. large selection size of the file in the Panel options), but I'm still puzzled as to how the two files can be set up as one and be smaller than the two separate files with out any compression. What Miss me?

    Thanks in advance!

    When you combine a file, it performs an operation of "save under".  This rewrites all the PDF object in the single file and is supposed to clean the file, while the single files may have had several saves which when you look at the inner workings of the PDF file simply add at the end of the file.  In other words, you get a file more cleanly written and optimized is also recorded for a quick display of Web pages.

  • I need to force the width of the columns to values that are smaller than the minimum preset (1 058 mm) indesign.

    Jongware provided two ideas to force the table rows and columns in the heights and widths smaller than the Indesign predefined 1.058 mm.

    For lines: app.selection [0] .properties = {autoGrow:false, height: "0.5 mm"};

    And for columns he sugested: app.selection [0] .width = "0.5 mm;

    The problem is that, while the code for lines works perfectly, for the columns return a error "Unit expected, but received 0.5 mm" I'm under Indesign cs6. Someone has ideas to help fixing such script, or maybe a different approach? Thank you!



    HM, other than the use of InDesign CS5.5 or underneath with scripts?
    Or export IDMS, open and edit (by script of course, it is just a plain text file in disguise), place IDMS and replace the table?

    (IDML as an alternative)

    Laughing out loud

    Uwe

  • Host memory consumption is higher than the comments its use (incl. Cached) and overhead?

    I'm under ESXi 5.1. I don't have any custom reserve configured for memory. I'm running in CVS 'Sandy Bridge' mode.

    I noticed earlier than expected host memory consumed on many of my guests. This example comments running Server R2 2012 with the latest version of VMware tools running.

    VMware reports

    VM-Resource-Memory.PNG

    The guest operating system reports

    VM-GuestOS-Memory.PNG

    My understanding is that the "Standby" and "Modified" on the client contains the ' cache ', and the 'Cached' memory prompt is the typical response to this question that I see when people seek only to the memory of 'In Use'. In my case, I'm factoring in the memory cache, my guest shows 3805 MB of real memory, yet my host shows 7.68 GB of memory consumed host, with only 68 MB of general consumption. According to my calculations, the virtual machine should be only consume about 4.28 GB of memory.

    Post edited by: bradduane Replace the values of text with screenshots.

    I think I found my answer in the guide 'Understanding memory resources management' here: http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/mem_mgmt_perf_vsphere5.pdf

    Section "when to retrieve memory host" page 15:

    «In the high State, the use of global memory machine virtual comments is smaller than the size of the host memory.» Whether or not the host memory is overcommitted, the hypervisor will not recover memory via hot-air balloon or permutation. (It is true that when the limit memory VM is not set).

    If memory free host down to the low threshold, the hypervisor begins to find the memory using the balloon. Balloon happens before free memory has actually reached the soft threshold because it takes time for the balloon pilot to allocate and PIN memory physics reviews. Usually, the balloon pilot is able to retrieve the memory in a timely order to keep free memory in the host above the soft line. »

    I checked esxtop, pressing "m" for the display of the memory, and I see that hosts VMKMEM shows 'State', so the only memory of way either currently retrieved is by sharing the page. Only when I start to run out of memory of the host, that this State becomes 'soft' or 'hard', balloon or Exchange will be held in order to free the "free" memory of comments. ESXTOP show my 'minfree"than 940 MB, while it shows that I physically 6960MB of free memory.

  • Brief, illustrated by the guest is smaller than the configured memory

    Hello

    We organize our virtual machines with the external supplier and asked us to set the virtual host (RHEL) 1024 MB

    At the end of that this has been done, I logged the guest and/cat/meminfo showed less than:

    cat/proc/meminfo

    MemTotal: 896108 kB

    MemFree: 18848 kB

    Buffers: 304120 kB

    Cache: 378700 kB

    SwapCached: 0 kB

    Active principles: 253004 kB

    Inactive: 486740 kB

    HighTotal: 0 kB

    HighFree: 0 kB

    LowTotal: 896108 kB

    LowFree: 18848 kB

    SwapTotal: 2097144 kB

    SwapFree: 2097144 kB

    Sale: 252 kB

    Writeback: 0 kB

    AnonPages: 56932 kB

    Mapped: 14356 kB

    Slab: 120860 kB

    PageTables: 4008 kB

    NFS_Unstable: 0 kB

    Bounce: 0 kB

    CommitLimit: 2545196 kB

    Committed_AS: 149664 kB

    VmallocTotal: 34359738367 kB

    VmallocUsed: 1784 KB

    VmallocChunk: 34359736183 kB

    HugePages_Total: 0

    HugePages_Free: 0

    HugePages_Rsvd: 0

    Hugepagesize: 2048 kB

    I asked supplier what is the reason and that this was their response:

    "Memory is less, on vm servers, because there is an overpass (128-200 MB), which is deducted from the total memory, if you need more RAM you ask accordingly."

    This explanation does not seem right, because I think General cool knowledge happens on the hypervisor and comments should receive all the memory configured, if there are no limits set by resource management policies.

    They sent me a screenshot of VMclient which shows

    Memory: 1024 MB

    Overhead: 104,53 MB

    Use of the memory of the host: 855 MB

    Memory usage comments: 471 MB

    Is there a bad configuration on their side, or am I missing something here?

    There may be a missunderstanding. When you assign 1024Mo to the guest who is the amount of memory the burst enables the OS. Point.

    If you ask me, your provider is pulling on your legs.

    Some useful links:

    http://pubs.VMware.com/vi35/resmgmt/vc_rm__jumpstart.3.3.html

    Find what

    "Memory of the Virtual Machine.

    Each virtual machine consumes memory based on its configured size, more the additional memory overhead for virtualization.

    Configured size.

    The configured size is a building maintained by the virtualization for the VM layer. This is the amount of memory that is presented to the guest operating system, but it is independent of the amount of physical RAM that is allocated to the virtual machine, which depends on the resource (shares, booking, limit) parameters explained below.

    For example, consider a virtual machine with a configured size of 1 GB. When the guest operating system starts, he believes that it is running on a machine with 1 GB of physical memory. The actual amount of memory physical host allocated to the virtual machine depends on its resource settings memory and memory on the host ESX Server contention. In some cases, the virtual machine may charge the full 1 GB. In other cases, he could receive a small stipend. Whatever the actual distribution, the guest operating system continues to behave as if it is running on a machine with 1 GB of physical memory dedicated. "

    here: http://pubs.vmware.com/vi35/resmgmt/vc_basic_mgmt.4.17.html

    AWo

    VCP / VMware vEXPERT 2009

    \[:o]===\[o:]

    = Due to a lack of employees, human beings humans are working here. -Treat it with care, they are rare. =

Maybe you are looking for