High disk usage. What is c?

Similar Questions

• my internet is used with any one using the computer as I think it's because the svchost.exe is corrupt, as a window comes up saying high disk useage has one an idea how to solve this

  the load down on the internet limit is used in about 2 weeks, that it is with a download of large files. also, a window pops up saying that he caused by svchost.exe high disk usage.

  I had a few a look at the problem on the computer and they seemed remedy and the down load was normal for a while, but has since returned to duty.
    

  Hello BrianWallacexx,

  This thread has been created in the forum Desktop and personalization; the Microsoft moderation team has moved this thread in the Forum user accounts, security, and confidentiality.

• problem with high CPU usage audiodg.exe

  While playing the game, I get a message saying that I raised the CPU usage 99% of the base. This is caused by "audiodg.exe. I tried a few bugs that I found online. I was told that they would not work with my computer. I have a Dell XPS15 second-generation i5. Has anyone experience this problem?

  Hello

  1. what you did to solve the problem?

  audiodg.exe [Windows Audio Device Graph Isolation] file hosts the audio engine for Vista and Window s 7.

  All DSP [Digital Signal Processing] and audio processing is done within this file. Suppliers are able to install their own audio effects and DSP in the audio pipeline, which is then processed by audiodg.exe

  In order to correct the high CPU usage, disable audio enhancements addressed by the file audiodg.exe. To disable the audio improvements, follow these steps:
  a. right click on the speaker in the lower corner icon right.

  b. Select the playback device from the menu. A list of devices should appear on the screen.

  c. double-click the device that has a green check mark. The properties for the device windows should open.

  d. click the improvements at the top.

  e. in the list of improvements, uncheck all the, or check Disable all improvements.

  f. click on the OK button to save your changes and close the window.

  g. click OK to close the devices window of reading.

  I would also say that you use resource monitor to monitor the CPU usage.

  Resource monitor is a tool that allows you to analyze the use of the CPU, disk, network, and memory in real time.

  You can use the performance tab in the Manager of tasks to see how the CPU of your computer is used by Windows and other programs running on your computer.

  Reference:

  See use of CPU utilization and other performance information

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/view-CPU-utilization-and-other-performance-information

• Qosmio F60 - alert constantly high CPU usage

  Hello

  About 12 months ago, I bought a Toshiba Qosmio F60 computer laptop 6 GB.

  When exploring using games, facebook etc, I am constantly alert of my Norton informing that there is high CPU usage.

  I have asked around locally and advised to delete Norton because this may be the problem. I'm not eager to do what my subscription is still valid.

  I also learned the other day that this is a common problem with laptops Toshiba using 'Explorer' and that I should use "Mozilla Firefox" instead which would correct the problem.

  I am trying to arrange this.

  Can you please indicate if it is a regular problem with Toshiba laptops and reviewing the options above to try to address this problem.

  It doesn't really seem to my computer, it goes more slowly and when in the Manager tasks, it is constantly fluctuating between 5 and 35%

  I look forward for your reply.

  Thank you

  Melissa

  Hello

  This isn't a problem laptop buddy
  Norton AntiVirus is a good antivirus program, but it uses a lot of resources and my experience locks the CPU.

  I removed this antivirus software and now I m using the avast and Avira Antivir free Antivirus software. Both are freeware software.

  But I still use Internet Explorer. Of course, I also installed the firefox and chrome. All these three browsers are great.

• DAQmx read results 2 ms/s in high CPU usage

  I have an application that reads the 32 channels of 2 ms/s analog input signals, at the same time. The actual hardware will be: SMU-8135 Win7, chassis SMU-1071, 2 x SMU-6368 (16 channels). The SMU-two 6368 will provide 32 channels data acquisition.

  I don't have the material at the moment, but I've been estimate the processor on the alternative configurations needs, because I have concerns about the use of the CPU to data acquisition high speed. Two alternative configurations are:

  (1) SMU-8133 (quad core) WinXP, SMU-1062 q, PXI-6133.

  (2) PXI-8106 (dual-core) WinXP, PXI-6133, PXI-1042.

  Note: PXI-6133 supports high speed HAVE 2 ms/s, at the same time.

  I wrote a simple continuous data acquisition software to allow me to compare the CPU usage. The sample rate and the number of channels are configurable. What I found is:

  (1) at low sampling frequency, for example 100 kech. / s, the CPU usage is minimal on both configurations (bicoeur or image), regardless of the number of channels is 1 or 8. The reading of the CPU was about 1-4%

  (2) at high sampling frequency, for example 2 ms/s, what is the number of channels used, either 1 or 8, the CPU utilization was 50% for dual core and 25% for the quad core, IE. a full core has been fully utilized.

  (3) the passage of the low use of the processor (<5%) to="" high="" cpu="" usage="" (="">45%) increases when the sampling rate is rather steep and shows interesting channel-dependence (note the following has been achieved with a PXI-8106 controller, dual-core).

  • @1 channel, it happened between 950 to 970 k
  • @2 channels, it happened between 470 to 480 k
  • @4 channels, it happened between 230 to 240 k,.
  • @8 channels, it happened between 120 to 130 k.

  This model reminds me of buffer length related question but I double checked a sufficient length of the buffer was used. He suggested also, surprising a few traffic jams occurred when the amount of data increases up to certain level.

  My question is, is this a problem with this particular card (PXI-6133) or driver DAQmx (9.5.5f4). How the problem is when I'm doing an acquisition of 32 channels?

  For your information, I have attached the benchmarking software.

  Thank you!

  Donghui Yin

  I followed this example code (see link below) and used based on events DAQmx, now the excessive CPU utilization problem has been resolved. Playback from the CPU is now less than 10 percent, while it could be 50% (in the case of dual-core) or 25% (case of hearts) at the same sample rate and number of channels.

  http://zone.NI.com/DevZone/CDA/EPD/p/ID/5911

• I get a pop up has a high memory usage when on Internet Explorer.

  MY COMPUTER IS currently RUNNING VERY SLOW WHEN I SURF the INTERNET a POP UP CONSTANTLY APPERARS. TOO HIGH MEMORY USAGE. What CAN I DO TO CURE THIS PROBLEM?

  Original title: pop ups. high memory usage

  try to clean the temporary files, disable unnecessary programs that are running

  in the background and disable add-ons, you don't use

  at the time.

• Disk usage statistics are not available

  Trying to generate a report for Reporting and chargeback-> inventory on the HIGHER-UPS. But the disk usage statistics are not available

  Hi Eric,.

  Not sure why it's empty.  You can check with the support.

• Svchost.exe several process taking high CPU usage

  * Original title: svchost.exe bleeding memory of multiple processes

  I am running Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit Service Pack 1 on decent office equipment.  Intel i7 - 2600 k, 16 GB of memory Corsair, 2 TB HD.  Recently, I noticed that sometimes the Web pages would much to slow while my 5.0 GHz network turned to 15.0 Mbs.  Also online MechWarrior gave me games much more than before lag to the point where I wouldn't be able to play.  This began about five to seven days from 29/09/14 and was regularly do worse.

  So I took a look at my resource monitor and the Task Manager and discovered fifteen process svchost.exe running and a svchost.exe * 32 running.  They were dispersed users (System, Local Service, Network Service), and we were shooting at 150 000 + K.  Sometimes there would be two consuming the same amount of memory, but I have yet to see more on the list do so.

  I'm certainly not an expert, but I take care of my computer.  My network is password protected, I ran a complete virus scan of the system that was detected (and if it is dangerous, I'm not at all more risky than Facebook sites on my PC.  I am saying that it is highly unlikely that I have no virus.)  I also checked the forums for others who have had the same problem and there were few.

  The only change I made is my network hardware, upgrade my modem and router/switch.  My router is a dual band and my computer is the only one on the frequency 5.0 but check on my computers to families that run on the 2.4, they have what seems like unusually high memory usage svchost.exe as well.  I went back two restore points, but that made no difference.

  Syschk control function run as administrator has not resolved the issue as well.  So what else am I missing?

  In order to diagnose your problem, we need run Windows performance toolkit, the instructions that are in this wiki

  If you have any questions do not hesitate to ask

• Cisco 4506 high CPU usage

  Hello

  Yesterday afternoon, one of our 4506 switch has climbed to 96% CPU usage. I did not the configuration changes. Here is the process with high CPU usage

  40 36630921841089949084 3360% 8.63% 10.56% 11,29% 0 Cat4k Mgmt HiPri

  41 30929587802851505705 1084 36,61 36,53% 36.18% 0 Cat4k Mgmt LoPri

  76 72485492 270422107 268 entry IP 7.91% 7.72% 7,68% 0

  113 35661224 40030007 890 21.91 28.13 29,84% 0 DHCPD receive

  After having HS health platform, what are those high:

  S2w-JobEventSchedule 10.00 7.54 10 8 100 500 9 9 7 36703:06

  Stub-JobEventSchedul 10.00 12.23 10 48 100 500 12 12 9 51004:51

  K2CpuMan review 30,00 29,44 30 99 100 500 33 32 25 37067:58

  K2AccelPacketMan: Tx 10.00 12,15 20 1 100 500 12 12 10 11871:22

  And finally sh platform cpu packet statistics gives me this

  Packets dropped in hardware by CPU Subport (txQueueNotAvail)

  UC Subport TxQueue 0 TxQueue 1 TxQueue 2 TxQueue 3

  ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------

  0 11045 14031 149981 188579662

  1               0               0               0         5919279

  2               0          115638               0               0

  RkiosSysPacketMan:

  Falures allowance package: 0

  Package (common software) buffer allocation falures: 0

  Package Buffer (software ESMP) allocation falures: 0

  Package Buffer (software EOBC) allocation falures: 0

  Falures IOS Packet Wrapper buffer allocation: 0

  Packets dropped in the overall treatment

  Total 5 s 1 min, 5 min 1 hour avg avg avg avg

  -------------------- --------- --------- --------- ----------

  146521131 0 0 0 0

  Packets dropped in treatment by event CPU

  AVG s Total 5 1 min, 5 min avg avg avg 1 hour event

  ----------------- -------------------- --------- --------- --------- ----------

  Input Acl 146002289 0 0 0 0

  SA Miss                             27         0         0         0          0

  Packets dropped in the treatment of priority

  AVG s Total 5 priority 1 min, 5 min avg avg avg 1 hour

  ----------------- -------------------- --------- --------- --------- ----------

  Normal 46723179 0 0 0 0

  Medium 518884 0 0 0 0

  High 99797883 0 0 0 0

  Packets dropped in the treatment of the reason

  AVG s Total 5 reason 1 min, 5 min avg avg avg 1 hour

  ------------------ -------------------- --------- --------- --------- ----------

  SrcAddrTableFilt 24 0 0 0 0

  L2DstDrop                             7         0         0         0          0

  L2DstDropInAcl 46 0 0 0 0

  NoDstPorts                           32         0         0         0          0

  NoFloodPorts 146521022 0 0 0 0

  The package 16 total queues

  Packets received from the packet queue

  Total 5 s 1 min, 5 min 1 hour avg avg avg avg queue

  ---------------------- --------------- --------- --------- --------- ----------

  6279742115 238 247 203 193 ESMP

  L2/L3Control 1320811357 57 48 43 41

  Host of learning 24933459 1 0 0 0

  L3 Fwd Medium 5813 0 0 0 0

  L3 Fwd Low 72923122 0 0 0 0

  L2 Fwd high 11130 0 0 0 0

  L2 Fwd Medium 164016 0 0 0 0

  L2 Fwd 242645408 227 237 193 185 Low

  L3 Rx High                           9         0         0         0          0

  L3 Rx 89296999 439 461 378 364 Low

  Failure of the RPF 129420 0 0 0 0

  Packets dropped packet queue

  Total 5 s 1 min, 5 min 1 hour avg avg avg avg queue

  ---------------------- --------------- --------- --------- --------- ----------

  L2/L3Control 18470371 0 0 0 0

  Host of learning 5825831 0 0 0 0

  L2 Fwd Low 405210 0 0 0 0

  L3 Rx Low                         9863         0         0         0          0

  I will be restarting the night switch to see if it helps.

  Thank you.

  Salman

  Hello Salman,

  If DHCP requests are taken over by clients, you will probably want to focus on the limiting of requests DHCP using DHCP snooping.

  ip dhcp snooping limit rate rate

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-4000-series-switches/65591-Cat4500-high-CPU.html#high_cpu

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/switches/LAN/catalyst4500/12-2/25ew/configuration/guide/conf/DHCP.html#wp1073418

  -Ginette

• searchindexer.exe extermemly high CPU usage - days

  Not sure that to do, I rebuilt the index, manually deleted the record of data to index, completely removed, rebooted, and then reinstalled Windows Search from the Add/Remove Windows features, I also chkdsk/f had my records.

  When the Searchindexer.exe uses as much CPU as she can I checked with resource monitor and it is not read to leave or by writing to all files, just chip away cycles CPU.

  Edit: more information

  I created a dump of the searchindexer.exe and its opening with a debugger tool, it is the content

  Microsoft (R) Windows debug 6.2.9200.16384 AMD64 Version
  Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

  Loading dump file [S:\Tools\SearchIndexer.exe.dmp]
  User Mini with full memory dump file: only application data is available

  Symbol search path is: * invalid *.
  ****************************************************************************
  * Loading of the symbol may be unreliable without a symbol search path.           *
  * Use .symfix to get the debugger to choose a symbol path.                   *
  * After adjusting your path to symbols, use .reload to refresh the locations of symbols. *
  ****************************************************************************
  Executable search path is:
  Windows 8 Version 9200 MP (8 procs) free x 64
  Product: WinNt, suite: SingleUserTS
  By: 6.2.9200.16384 (win8_rtm.120725 - 1247)
  Computer name:
  The debugging session: Sun Nov 4 22:01:24.000 2012 (UTC - 07:00)
  System Uptime: 0 days 10:09:39.102
  Running time: 0 days 0:54:31.000
  .........................................................
  Loading unloaded module list
  ..........
  ERROR: The symbol file is not found.  Defaulted to export symbols ntdll.dll.
  ERROR: The symbol file is not found.  By default for exporting symbols for KERNELBASE.dll -.
  ntdll! NtWaitForSingleObject + 0xa:
  000007fc ' ret 5b172c2a c3

  also, I checked the thread problem in hacker process, here is the stack:

  0, ntoskrnl.exe! SeAccessCheck + 0x1ef
  1, ntoskrnl.exe! KeDelayExecutionThread + 0xc32
  2, ntoskrnl.exe! KeWaitForSingleObject + 0x1cf
  3, ntoskrnl.exe! _misaligned_access + 0 x 809
  4, ntoskrnl.exe! SeAccessCheck + 0 x 280
  5, ntoskrnl.exe! SeAccessCheck + 0x4d1
  6, korwbrkr.dll! DllUnregisterServer + 0x2f48
  7, korwbrkr.dll! DllUnregisterServer + 0x243e
  8, korwbrkr.dll + 0 x 12173
  9, korwbrkr.dll! DllUnregisterServer + 0 x 1696
  10, korwbrkr.dll! DllUnregisterServer + 0x62f9
  11, korwbrkr.dll! DllUnregisterServer + 0 x 6117
  12, korwbrkr.dll! DllUnregisterServer + 0x5db9
  13, korwbrkr.dll! DllUnregisterServer + 0 x 5882
  14, korwbrkr.dll! DllUnregisterServer + 0x6fa0
  15, mssrch.dll! DllGetClassObject + 0x3feba
  16, mssrch.dll + 0 x 19425
  17, kernel32.dll! BaseThreadInitThunk + 0x1a
  18, ntdll.dll. RtlUserThreadStart + 0x21

  I also deleted my Outlook data files and started from scratch with my emails, and makes sure the data folders are not on a concert.

  I installed all the updates that are available for Windows 8 and I also ran sfc/scannow.

  I would be grateful if anyone could offer any help at all, thank you.

  Hi entire,

  disable the service in the Services, restart the computer and then re-enable the service.

  I tried, I completely uninstalled from Windows Add/Remove Features service, rebooted the PC and re - he added, and same deal.

  Anyway I found is what the problem is, it's the korwbrkr.dll, it seems to be related to a Korean dictionary, as if the indexer is you are trying to index something with characters Koreans inside (not aware that I have something like that), and he throws a loop for I renamed the korwbrkr.dll to korwbrkr.bak and it has linked the dictionary file and removed from the search index and I allow the indexer to run all night and it shows that indexing is complete, and I have no more high CPU usage.

  I was dealing with high utilization of the processor of the indexer for weeks, now my system is at peace.

• my windows 8 pro responds with indicated 100% disk usage in the Task Manager

  my PC pro 8 windows stops responding and when I check in Manager tasks, it indicates 100% disk usage while the CPU is not used and not even alone is open. I don't know what the problem with my system since this problem started recently. I use windows 8 months that it released until yesterday, I had no problem. I can restore pc to the normal operating mode after several forced off using the power button. This especially happens first start to the top of the day while all day if I'm constantly using pc I don't encounter any problem, but if I put it to sleep and again once I wake up get similar problem. I am really worried please help me solve this problem. When I checked in the Task Manager it is the system that is causing the issue

  It's my system config

  Win 8 pro 64-bit

  AMD fx cpu 4100

  4 GB of ram

  Thank you

  Help, please

  Hello

  Just disable superfetch service...

• RdrCEF high CPU usage

  Hello.
  First of all, sorry for my weak English level.
  
  A few days ago, I installed Adobe Reader DC on all servers of my Citrix XenDesktop 7.6 farm. All started well, but now I have problems with high CPU usage. I have seen that for each user using reader DC open between 1 and 3 processes with the same name, RdrCEF.exe. This process consumes a lot of memory and sometimes, according to the PDF file, use a large part of the performance issues causing CPU in other sessions on the server user.
  
  What is the process of RdrCEF? Phy it's open several times by user ? And above all, how can I prevent the use of this process as much CPU?
  
  I hope someone can help me.
  Thank you.

  
  

  Hi all

  We fixed these issues with our last update. I ask you all to update via Help Adobe software-> check the updates...

  Please let us know if you face this or any problem after update.

  -Thank you

  Sunil Soni

• Periods of high disk latency

  Hello - I just moved to a new company and I am working on virtualization of most of the servers here. It's a small IT shop with 20-30 servers. I bought 3 new HP DL380 G7 servers and I have about half of the 20 converted physical servers. I noticed a problem that appears and it seems random times.

  There are 2 tables (13 6 disks raid, raid 5 disks 5) 2 luns, a VMFS shared LUN between the 3 servers. This is on a HP P2000 G3 FC SAN (already in place before). Every once and a while I notice latency of very high disk it seems that only on the LUNS on the Raid 5 array.

  I've attached a screenshot of ESXTOP running on all servers ESX 3 showing the high latency. I can understand if there was a very high use but is not really yet everything going on at this time, as you can see on the screenshots. The tweak only I made so far is to increase the depth of queue to 64.

  Brocade 8 GB HBA using hanging on the HP (Brocade) switches. Everything works to 8 GB and all readers of the San are 6 GB SAS.

  I'm new on this and HP options without, came from one world IBM DS4xxx, so I do not know that how still to watch the performance on the SAN itself, the web interface does not have all followed what-so-ever.

  Any help is appreciated-

  Thank you

  Well, I agree that it was a question of ownerhip lun.

  The extent of maxing controllers, theres more to the issue than just flow.  Its actually very common on these lowend tables except if you make something trivial like a streaming the CPU controller will not be able to do in the face of a workload of IOPS / s high (or even moderate).  This isn't the bandwidth, it is the CPU on the controller.  His community does even more than you might expect on the bays of large companies (HDS USP, EMC Symm, etc.).

  -Matt

  VCP, VCDX #52, Unix Geek, Nerd of storage

• High CPU usage after upgrading to ESX 4 Update 1

  I just upgraded 2 hosts (IBM HS21 blades) 4 ESX to ESX 4 Update 1, and now I experience high CPU usage.  Before use on each host would turn around 10%, but now after the upgrade, it's about 80 percent on each and now all the virtual machines are running very slow as a result.

  The only change that has been done is that I demoted local readers of hard drives of 500 GB SAS drives to 7 200 RPM 73 GB SAS drives mirrored, 10 000 rpm mirrored and performed a clean installation of ESX 4U1 on each host.  As the VMs 14 are located on a SAN disk array I thought only, it would improve the performance of the hosts.

  Has anyone else had a similar problem or a potential solution?

  See you soon,.

  Josh.

  Seems very strange.

  You have the same number of VM? You have to upgrade the VMware tools?

  There are other changes?

  Local disk is not so important to the overall performance.

  André

• The photos in photo looks blurry, with large pixels. Recorded images were of high resolution, why what is happening?

  I used the migration assistant to transfer all the data from my old macbook pro to my new iMac, now the images in the Photos seem to be blurred, with large pixels. Recorded images were of high resolution, why what is happening? Is it possible to fix it. In the old macbook pro, the image looks ok.

  Migration assistant has a really bad experience with iPhoto and Photos

  If you still your old MB of available space, connect it to your new Mac (network, mode target firewire or use an external to the Mac OS extended (journaled) format hard drive and drag the iPhoto library folder images on the new Mac and heck the iPhoto library to icon in the Dock to migrate Photos)

  I hope this will work better

  LN