I am trying to speed up the performance of my pc.

Similar Questions

• How to speed up the performance of Tecra A4

  How can I speed up my Tecra A4 performance. I don't want the usual diskfrag and the cleaning disc. Is there an I can change to improve the performance of specific parameters?

  Hello

  I put t know how you are familiar with computers, but the best way to optimase performance is to disable unnecessary applications at startup in MSCONFIG. Tecra A4 is beautiful unit. I put t know how much RAM is there, but if you want better performance I recommend you update maximum (2 GB). Upgrading, you can use compatible RAM module:

  512 MB DDR2-400/533 (PA3412U - 1 M 51) and
  1 GB OF DDR2 400/533 (PA3411U-1M1G).

  By the way: If you start the computer under Services management you will find a large number of settings and options. Check them and Google all over the place. Maybe you will find some tips how to disable someyou don t need.

  One last thing: in Device Manager, you can disable all devices, you need t (modem, PCMCIA, or something similar). All these materials cannot be detected at startup.

• Is there a way to speed up the RK4 screws?

  One of the oldest parts of my application is a simulation of a vector with a value of using the integrated RK4 screw to NiGmathlib. Simulations tend to have about 100 k series of this VI, with 1 k will take about 200ms. If I were to use an implementation of RK4 C under a function node, this would maybe go faster? Or do I just reduce the number of time steps?

  Is there a specific lead-time, you must realize, or interest you by speeding up the performance in general?

  If an implementation of code C of the RK4 would go more quickly depends on many factors such as the specific implementation of the code, how compilers translate the code, and if so or not the LabVIEW VI or C code is able to take advantage of parallel execution. If you are interested to know which is faster, your best bet is to try each idea. Change him much time seems like the easier, so why not start there and see what you can do?

• The speed of the processor 1 group 0 is restricted by the system firmware. The processor has been in this state of reduced performance for 4 seconds since the last report.

  The speed of the processor 1 group 0 is restricted by the system firmware. The processor has been in this state of reduced performance for 4 seconds since the last report.

  Event ID: 37
  Source: Kernel-processor-Power
  Task category: 7

  -What it means and how to fix this?

  : S

  Make sure that the system has sufficient cooling, and that you have upgraded the BIOS most recent.

• I tried many combinations of the different pc in order to transfer files from one pc to the other and only max speed I have is from 4 to 10 Mbps.

  Hello

  I tried many combinations of the different pc in order to transfer files from one pc to the other and only max speed I have is from 4 to 10 Mbps.

  I use the switch/cat6 cables only the router is capable of 100 Mbps.

  Also, I connect the pc directly with cable and still the same speed.

  Win7 will get more than that and how?

  I read the other posts on this topic, but all patches are not applicable to me.

  I used various cables and switches and PCs in order to eliminate the possibility of a defective unit.

  Can you please help?

  Thank you

  Andreas

  Hello Andreas,

  The question you posted would be better suited in the TechNet Forums. I would recommend posting your query in the TechNet Forums.

  Forum TechNet Windows 7

  TechNet Windows Server Forum

  Hope this information helps.

• Should we leave how much free space on the C drive before affecting the performance and speed?

  Hello!

  Hard drive of my new PC (C) is 1 TB (processor Samsung 7i, Windows 8.1). It doesn't have any other disk/partition. How this space is safe to use to store large files (videos, esp., stored in the native video library file) without harming the performance and speed?

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Thank you!

  Anna

  Sunday, March 1, 2015 10:59 + 0000, AnaFilipaLopes wrote:

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Planning your Partitions

  The Question

  Partitions, how much should I have on my hard drive, what do I use
  each of them for, and what size should each one be?

  It s a common question, but unfortunately this doesn t have a
  only simple, just answer to all the world. A lot of people will respond with
  the way they do, but their response isn't necessarily best for the
  person seeking (in many cases it isn't right even for the person)
  response).

  Terminology

  First, let's rethinking the terminology. Some people ask "should I".
  partition my drive? That s the wrong question, because the
  the terminology is a little strange. Some people think that the word
  "partition" means divide the drive into two or more partitions.
  That s not correct: to partition a drive is to create one or several
  partitions on it. You must have at least one partition to use
  He who think they have an unpartitioned disk actually
  have a player with only one partition on it and it s normally
  Called C:. The choice you have is to have more than one
  partition, not that it's the partition at all.

  A bit of history

  Back before Windows 95 OEM Service Release 2 (also known as Windows
  95 (b) was published in 1996, all MS-DOS and Windows hard drives have been set
  using the file system FAT16 (except for very tiny to aid
  FAT12). That 16-bit only because were used for addressing, FAT16 has a
  maximum 2 GB partition size.

  More than 2 GB of hard disks were rare at the time, but if you had
  one, you must have multiple partitions to use all the available
  space. But even if your drive was not larger than 2GB, FAT16 created
  Another serious problem for many people - the size of the cluster has been
  more great if you had a larger partition. Cluster sizes increased from 512
  bytes for a partition to no greater than32Mb all the way up to 32 KB for a
  partition of 1 GB or more.

  More the cluster size, the space more is wasted on a hard drive.
  That s as space for all the files is allocated in whole clusters
  only. If you have 32 KB clusters, a 1 byte file takes 32 KB, a file, a
  greater than 32 k byte takes 64 k and so on. On average, each file
  about half of his last group waste.

  If large partitions create a lot of waste (called "soft"). With a 2 GB
  FAT16 drive in a single cluster, if you have 10,000 files, each
  lose half a cluster of 32 KB, you lose about 160 MB for relationships. This s
  back in an important part of a player that probably cost more than $400
  1996 - around $ 32.

  So what did the people? They divided their 2 GB drive in two,
  three or more logical drives. Each of these logical drives has been
  smaller the real physical disk, had smaller clusters, and
  so less waste. If, for example, she was able to keep all the partitions
  less than 512 MB, cluster size was only 8 KB, and the loss was reduced to a
  a quarter of what it would be otherwise.

  People partitioned for other reasons also, but back in the days of
  FAT16, it was the main reason to do so.

  The present

  Three things have changed radically since 1996:

  1. the FAT32 and NTFS file systems came along, allowing a larger
  partitions with smaller clusters and so much less waste. In
  with NTFS, cluster sizes are 4 K, regardless of the size of the partition.

  2 hard drives have become much larger, often more than 1 TB (1000 GB) in
  size.

  3 hard drives have become much cheaper. For example, a 500 GB drive
  can be bought today for about $50. That s 250 times the size of this
  Player 2Gb typical 1996, about one-eighth of the price.

  What these things mean together which is the reason to be old to have
  multiple partitions to avoid the considerable wastage of disk space left.
  The amount of waste is much less than it used to be and the cost of
  that waste is much less. For all practical purposes, almost nobody does
  should no longer be concerned about slack, and it should no longer be
  has examined when planning your partition structure.

  What Partitions are used for today

  There are a variety of different ways people put in place several
  scores of these days. Some of these uses are reasonable, some are
  debatable, some are downright bad. I'll discuss a number of Commons
  partition types in the following:

  1. a partition for Windows only

  Most of the people who create such a partition are because they believe
  If they never have to reinstall Windows properly, at least they
  He won t lose their data and he won t have to reinstall their applications.
  because both are safe on other partitions.

  The first of these thoughts is a false comfort and the second
  is downright bad. See the analysis of the types of partition 2 and 4
  below to find out why.

  Also note that over the years, a lot of people who find their windows
  partition that has begun to be the right size proves to be too
  small. For example, if you have such a partition for Windows and later
  upgrade to a newer version of Windows, you may find that your Windows
  partition is too small.

  2. a partition for installed programs

  This normally goes hand in hand with the partition type 1, a partition for
  just Windows. The thought that if you reinstall Windows, your
  installed application programs are safe if they are in another
  partitions is simply not true. That s because all programs installed
  (with the exception of an occasional trivial) have pointers to the inside
  Windows, in the registry and elsewhere, as well as associated files
  buried in the Windows folder. So if Windows, pointers and
  the files go with it. Given that the programs need to be reinstalled if Windows
  the fact, this reasoning to a separate partition for programs not
  work. In fact, there is almost never a good reason to separate
  Windows of the software application into separate partitions.

  3. a partition for the pagefile.

  Some people think mistakenly that the pagefile on another
  score will improve performance. It is also false; It doesn t
  help and often I hurt, performance, because it increases the movement of the head
  to get back to the page to another file frequently used
  data on the disk. For best performance, the paging file should normally
  be on the most widely used score of less used physical player. For
  almost everyone with a single physical disk than the same drive s
  Windows is on C:.

  4. a partition for backup for other partitions.

  Some people make a separate partition to store backups of their other
  or partitions. People who rely on a "backup" are a joke
  themselves. It is only very slightly better than no backup at all.
  because it leaves you likely to be simultaneously the original losses
  and backup for many of the most common dangers: the head crashes and other
  types of drive, serious glitches to power failure, near lightning
  strikes, virus attack, even stolen computer.  In my opinion,.
  secure backup must be on a media removable and not stored in the
  computer.

  5. a partition for data files

  Above, when I discussed separate Windows on a clean partition,
  I pointed out that separate data from Windows is a false comfort if
  He of done with the idea that data will be safe if Windows ever
  must be reinstalled. I call it a false comfort that's because
  I'm afraid many people will rely on this separation, think that their
  data are safe there and so do not take measures to
  Back it up. In truth the data is not safe there. Having to reinstall
  Windows is just one of the dangers to someone a s hard disk and not
  probably even one. This kind of "backup" falls into the same
  category, as a backup to other partitions partition; It lets you
  sensitive to the simultaneous loss of the original and the backup on many of
  the most common dangers that affect the entire physical disk, not
  just the particular partition. Security comes from a solid backup
  diet, not how partition you.

  However, for some people, it may be a good idea to separate Windows and
  programs on the one hand of the data on the other, putting each of the
  two types into separate partitions. I think that most people
  partitioning scheme must be based on their backup system and backup
  plans are generally of two types: whole hard disk imaging
  or data only backup. If you back up data, backup is
  usually facilitated by the presence of a separate with data only partition;
  to save just the score easily, without having to
  collect pieces from here and elsewhere. However, for
  those who backup by creating an image of the entire disk, there is
  usually little, if any, benefit the separation of data in a partition of
  its own.

  Furthermore, in all honesty, I must point out that there are many
  very respected people who recommend a separate partition for Windows,
  Whatever your backup plan.  Their arguments haven t convinced
  me, but there are clearly two views different here.

  6. a partition to image files

  Some people like to deal with the images and videos as something separate
  other data files and create a separate partition for them. To my
  the spirit, an image is simply another type of data and there is no
  the advantage in doing so.

  7. a partition for music files.

  The comments above related to the image files also apply to music
  files. They are just another type of data and must be dealt with the
  just like the other data.

  8. a partition for a second operating system to dual-boot to.

  For those who manage several operating systems (Windows Vista, Windows
  XP, Windows 98, Linux, etc.), a separate partition for each operating
  system is essential. The problems here are beyond the scope of this
  discussion, but simply to note that I have no objection to s
  all these partitions

  Performance

  Some people have several partitions because they believe that it
  somehow improves performance. That s not correct. The effect is
  probably low on modern computers with modern hard disks, but if
  whatever it is, the opposite is true: more music mean poorer
  performance. That's because normally no partition is full and it
  so are gaps between them. It takes time for the drive s
  read/write heads to cross these gaps. Close all files
  are, faster access to them will be.

  Organization

  I think a lot of people overpartition because they use scores as a
  organizational structure. They have a keen sense of order and you want to
  to separate the apples from the oranges on their readers.

  Yes, separating the different types of files on partitions is a
  technical organization, but then is to separate different types of
  files in folders. The difference is that the walls are static and
  fixed in size, while the files are dynamic, changing size automatically
  as needed to meet your changing needs. This usually done records
  a much better way to organize, in my opinion.

  Certainly, partitions can be resized when necessary, but except with the latter
  versions of Windows, which requires a third-party software (the and the
  possibility to do so in Windows is primitive compared to the third-party
  solutions). These third party software normally costs money and not
  any point and how stable it is, affects the entire disk.
  with the risk of losing everything. Plan your partitions in
  first place and repartitioning, none will be necessary.  The need
  to repartition usually occurs as a result of overpartitioning in
  the first place.

  What often happens when people organize with partitions instead
  records are that they make a miscalculation of how much room they need on each
  This partition, and then when they run out of space on the partition
  When a file is logically, while having plenty of space
  on the other hand, they simply saving the file in the score of "poor".
  Paradoxically, therefore, results in this kind of score structure
  less organization rather than more.

  So how should I partition my drive

  If you read what came before, my findings will not come as a
  surprise:

  1. If your backup set is the image of the entire disk, have just one
  single (usually c partition :));

  2. If you backups just data, have two partitions one for Windows and
  application programs installed (usually c :)), the other for data
  (normally D :).)

  With the exception of multiple operating systems, it is rarely
  any advantage to have more than two partitions.

• Hi Im trying to switch plans but anyway I'm stuck inside a blank page in my adobe account. Oh I live in South Africa I limited the speed of the line and I think I ran... Any help?, Hi Im trying to change the plans but anyway I'm stuck inside some bl

  Hi Im trying to switch plans but anyway I'm stuck inside a blank page in my adobe account. Oh I live in South Africa I limited the speed of the line and I think I ran... Any help?, Hi Im trying to change the plans but anyway I'm stuck inside a blank page in my adobe account. Oh I live in South Africa I limited the speed of the line and I think I ran... Any help?

  Hello

  Please consult phone support | Orders, returns of trade

  Hope this helps!

• What is the impact of the use of a variant on the performance data type, speed memory applications etc.?

  This is one of my sons "allows to get this settled once for all".

  I avoided data types variant when it is possible to track the performance of my apps. Some observatsions, I made over the years, I believe that;

  (1) operations in place cannot carry on variants.

  (2) in the way of a Variant to a sub - VI (regardless of the terminal on the connector of the icon) are always copied.

  I would like confirmation or correction of the foregoing order of we know better this animal we call LabVIEW.

  Thank you

  Ben

  Ben wrote:

  This is one of my sons "allows to get this settled once for all".

  I avoided data types variant when it is possible to track the performance of my apps. Some observatsions, I made over the years, I believe that;

  (1) operations in place cannot carry on variants.

  (2) in the way of a Variant to a sub - VI (regardless of the terminal on the connector of the icon) are always copied.

  I would like confirmation or correction of the foregoing order of we know better this animal we call LabVIEW.

  Thank you

  Ben

  I check I can pass a Variant to a Subvi with a copy, but it is still impossible to do something (scaling limit controls etc.) with a Variant without first copying it in a new buffer the conversion 'of the Variant.

  Thus,.

  For large sets of data, the variants are a bad idea.

  Ben

• Increase the speed of the Internet to watch videos

  Original title: How do my winxp

  Hi Windows Experts,

  I am using Windows XP - SP2 (32 bit).  Compac Presario.   Initially, it came with 500 RAM, but I later increased to 1.5 GB of RAM.  The size of the HDD is 60 GB.
  Recently I tried to look online Chinese drama from Youku.  The streaming is very slow and often paused and continue through the episode intermitantly.
  Can I do any changes on the settings of Windows XP to speed up my streaming online videos?  Perhaps something like the performance or the Visual or settings are?
  Please notify.
  Thank you.
  glemel

  Hi GIGADANIEL12,

  BTW, Ethio is not my name, is the name of one of my favorite jazz bands and Matt summer is one of their songs... Laughing out loud...  Now to the issue. Click on the link below, to check and see if Adobe is installed and running correctly on your computer.

  Detect the flash version and installation.

  http://kb2.Adobe.com/CPS/155/tn_15507.html

  If she runs, and you still have questions, one of the possible fixes is to uninstall and reinstall the software and check if this program for resolution of the issue. To do this, run the uninstaller from adobe from the link below to remove the current installation.

  Program uninstall Adobe flash.

  http://helpx.Adobe.com/Flash-Player/KB/uninstall-Flash-Player-Windows.html#main_Download_the_Adobe_Flash_Player_uninstaller

  When you're done, download a new copy of the latest version of flash player from the link below and install it. Don't forget to uncheck the box with google chrome if you decide that you do not want.

  Get Adobe Flash.

  http://get.Adobe.com/flashplayer/otherversions/

  To solve problems adobe flash, please refer to the link provide below.

  Troubleshoot installation of Adobe flash and other problems.

  http://helpx.Adobe.com/Flash-Player/KB/installation-problems-Flash-Player-Windows.html

  Let us know if you have any other questions.

• How to speed up the process of updating after clean install

  original title: updates after a clean install

  I just performed a facility clean my machine that runs Vista Home Basic Edition and is now trying to download all the updates it has had over the past three years (ex-factory).

  However it will slowly (no surprise) and I was wondering is there something I could do to speed up the process.  Currently, I am just by clicking on start - Windows Update and let it download what they want from there.  However I have noticed saying she "Download 80 updates", it installs then say 5 of those, restarts and then says "Download 75 updates"-have I really downloaded updates and then lost 80 them, or he really download only 5?

  I also thought the oldest download first, but I can't seem to find an opption to do this - is - it possible?  It seems just stupid for me to download updates of 2010 before those of 2008 (assuming that's what he does lol!)

  All advice or pointers that would help to do that, go a little faster would be immensely appreciated.

  See you soon

  Q

  I just performed a facility clean my machine that runs Vista Home Basic Edition and is now trying to download all the updates it has had over the past three years (ex-factory).

  However it will slowly (no surprise) and I was wondering is there something I could do to speed up the process.  Currently, I am just by clicking on start - Windows Update and let it download what they want from there.  However I have noticed saying she "Download 80 updates", it installs then say 5 of those, restarts and then says "Download 75 updates"-have I really downloaded updates and then lost 80 them, or he really download only 5?

  I also thought the oldest download first, but I can't seem to find an opption to do this - is - it possible?  It seems just stupid for me to download updates of 2010 before those of 2008 (assuming that's what he does lol!)

  All advice or pointers that would help to do that, go a little faster would be immensely appreciated.

  See you soon

  Q

  Start by installing the latest Service Pack (see http://support.microsoft.com/kb/935791). You'll have so far fewere updtes to install.

  Also note the following regarding your answer to the question of PA Bear "clean install has been through choice. After 3 years machine has become bloated and slow, and I decided to wipe them fresh, start over and give up unused programs that seemed a good idea at the time. » :

  In my view, it is usually a mistake. With a minimum of care, it should never be necessary to reinstall Windows (Vista or any version). I ran Windows 3.0, 3.1, WFWG 3.11, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7 now, each for the period of time before the next release is out and everyone on two or more machines here. I never reinstalled none of them (with one exception--a problem that I worked on for weeks without success), and I've never had anything more than an occasional minor problem.

  It is my belief that this erroneous notion comes from the technical support people in most of the major OEMs. Their solution to almost any problem, for they know not quickly answer is "reformat and reinstall. It is the ideal solution for them. It gets you phone turned off quickly, it almost always works, and it does not need to do any real troubleshooting (a skill that most of them has obviously not in any great degree).

  But it leaves you with all the work and all the problems. You must restore all backups of your data, you must reinstall all of your programs, you must reinstall all Windows and updates of the application, you must locate and install all the necessary drivers for your system, you will need to recustomize Windows and all your applications to work the way you are comfortable with.

  In addition to all these things being long and painful, you may encounter difficulties with some of them: you will find all your CDs application? You will find all the necessary installation codes? You have data backups to restore? You still remember all the customizations and settings that can be installed to make everything work the way you like it? Sometimes there are problems that are so difficult to resolve that Windows has to be reinstalled properly. But they are few and far between; RESETTLEMENT should not be a substitute for troubleshooting; It should be a last resort, to do that once all other troubleshooting by qualified person attempts have failed.

  And perhaps most important: If you reformat and reinstall without knowing what caused your problem, you will most likely repeat the behavior that caused it and quickly find yourself in exactly the same situation.

• "The speed of the CPU 0 in group 0 is restricted by the system firmware."

  Hello!

  My computer has recently been very slow. I tried to format and reinstall, but it did not help. When I checked the system event log, I saw this warning message repeatedly:

  Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-Processor-Power
  37
  Warning!
  The speed of processor 0 in group 0 is being limited by system firmware. The processor has been in this reduced performance state for X seconds since the last report.
  

  My CPU time are OK, and I've updated the drivers and BIOS. All power saving settings are set for maximum performance. Does anyone know what causes this problem and how it is fixed?

  Model: Pavilion DV7 6010so

  CPU: AMD Turion Dual-Core processor P560

  OS: Windows 7 Home Premium

  EDIT: According to the performance test PassMark, my CPU performance is one-third of the exception. There is definitely something wrong.

  I do not have the main function of parking in any case, it's Intel only, I guess.

  With the help of AMD Overdrive didn't completely solve the problem, as something of force multiplier to 4 a few minutes after changing. I thought it had to be a kind of BIOS-side power save "feature", but the official BIOS of HP sucks and it is not all the options related to it. I installed the modded BIOS (it's risky, I know), disabled AMD Cool ' silent mode and now sticks to 12.5 x multiplier.

  Pretty weird, huh? Cool ' Quiet is supposed to increase multiplier when necessary and lower it when the computer is idle, but for some reason it has stopped working properly a few months ago and stuck the multiplier to 4 x.

• Speed up the CC of Lightroom on new computer when editing lots of sports action scenes.

  Just built a new computer. Asked to be able to perform more precisely the simultaneously lightroom and photoshop and other programs running in the bg, Outlook, a browser, etc...

  Lightroom is even slower I want trying to mass sport edition action shots. What can I do to make it work faster?

  Here's my system of lightroom Info:

  Version of Lightroom: CC 2015.4 [1060496]

  License: Creative Cloud

  Operating system: Windows 10

  Version: 10.0

  Application architecture: x 64

  System architecture: x 64

  Number of logical CPUs: 4

  Processor speed: 3.3 GHz

  Built-in memory: 16267,6 MB

  Real memory for Lightroom: 16267,6 MB

  Real memory used by Lightroom: 3388,5 MB (20.8%)

  Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 4431,4 MB

  Memory cache size: 979,6 MB

  Maximum thread count used by Camera Raw: 4

  Camera Raw SIMD optimization: SSE2, AVX, AVX2

  System DPI setting: 96 DPI

  Composition of the Bureau enabled: Yes

  Exhibition: 1) 1600 x 900, 2) 1920 x 1080

  Entry types: Multitouch: no, built-in touch: No, built-in pen: no, touch external: No, external pen: no keyboard: No.

  Graphic processor News:

  Intel(r) HD Graphics 530

  Check the supported OpenGL: past

  Vendor: Intel

  Version: 3.3.0 - Build 20.19.15.4331

  Renderer: Intel(r) HD Graphics 530

  LanguageVersion: 3.30 - Build 20.19.15.4331

  The application folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Lightroom

  Library path: C:\Users\Tiffany\Pictures\Lightroom\Lightroom Catalog.lrcat

  Settings folder: C:\Users\Tiffany\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\Lightroom

  Plugins installed:

  (1) home canon Plugin

  (2) Facebook

  (3) Flickr

  (4) Imagenomic Portraiture

  (5) attachment Plugin Leica

  (6) home Plugin Nikon

  (7) ON1 Effects 10

  (8) ON1 Improve 10

  (9) ON1 Photo 10

  (10) ON1 Portrait 10

  (11) ON1 Resize 10

  (12) ON1 Resize 10

  Config.LUA flags: None

  Map #1: Vendor: 8086

  Feature: 1912

  Subsystem: 79721462

  Review: 6

  Video memory: 128

  Map #2: Seller: 1414

  Device: 8 c

  Subsystem: 0

  Revision: 0

  Video memory: 0

  AudioDeviceIOBlockSize: 1024

  AudioDeviceName: Speakers (Realtek High Definition Audio)

  AudioDeviceNumberOfChannels: 2

  AudioDeviceSampleRate: 44100

  Build: LR5x102

  Direct2DEnabled: false

  GPUDevice: not available

  OGLEnabled: true

  In Lightroom, go to Preferences, then click on the performance tag, then uncheck the box to disable the GPU acceleration.

• Processor does not reach 100% of the speed of the clock when 'PCI Lock' is disabled in the Advanced Start parameters

  Hi guys,.

  Ran into a strange problem, so thought I'd give this forum to try. Tried to discuss on the Windows forums community but they have been seen nothing of all this.

  I noticed that the machine felt slow in the last month, but never gave him much however. Today, for some reason, I opened the Task Manager and noticed that no matter how much charge the CPU is obtained, the speed does not pass more than 2.28 GHz (Standard clock speed is 2.3 GHz). Now, at first I thought that it could be the power settings, since I got the butterfly processor speed previously by reducing it to 95%. After a few game, I spread the power settings, since the system does not meet them if you cut the State of maximum power, the processor speed drops too. When the value to 100%, it does not more than 2.28 GHz. In other words, since it's a pocessor mode, because it reaches its full capacity, it won't in mode.

  I updated the drivers and BIOS from the manufacturers Web site. The only way to fix this is by checking the box 'PCI Lock' in the advanced in msconfig startup options. When the box is checked, the computer restarts and the processor works properly, increasing up to 3.3 GHz. The only problem with either once the box is checked, problems with other devices, for example, the network card is not recognized at all. Uncheck box reboot and network card functions as it should, but the processor is throttled.

  I don't know if it could have a bearing on the question somehow, but fails the secondary HARD disk spin down according to the power settings. It is supposed to stop after 1 minute, but despite having no activity (in resources, or audible reads/writes monitor) it keeps spinning. If you have any advice on the processor, maybe you have an idea on this instead? His eating his power and producing unnecessary heat and noise because the hard drive is used for backups.

  The specifications are:

  Reference Dell M3800

  Windows Pro 10

  CPU i7-4712HQ 2.3 GHz (up to 3.3 GHz)

  16 GB OF RAM

  512 Samsung SSD (with BONE)

  Secondary 1 to

  I don't know when the issue started, since performance was slow for about a month and I can't blame new facilities for this. The PCI lock seems the only way to solve the problem temporarily. All the drivers are up to date, even tried downgrading and upgrading the BIOS. Only the PCI lock seems to have no effect.

  Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  Hi cc171,.

  Thank you for your continued support.

  After a few more game, I'm desperate and "reset" of the operating system (keeping my files). That, to my surprise, did not help. I've done some windows system checks in the cmd (sfc and dism) and tools are a few corrupted files (which they were unable to repair due to files being corrupted as source). I then provided dism an iso windows fresh to keep system files to and managed to fix the image. Unfortunately, this does not solve my problem.

  Here are the corrupt system file that could not be repaired:

  Could not reproject corrupted file [23 ml:24] "? \C:\WINDOWS\SysWOW64"\[l:10]"opencl.dll"; source file in the store is also corrupted

  I then proceeded to do a complete factory reset (because I lost all my applications anyway, there was nothing else for me to lose). The system restored to W8.1, which is really strange, because I deleted all the files of previous windows.old through disk cleanup. Even if I had retired, good news. The limitation was missing, and the drive turned down when realized. I've been invited to upgrade to W10, I did (the download process and installation is rather time consuming...) and once up and running, the CPU still works correctly.

  Of course, my next step, has been updated all my drivers using my product key on the DELL Web site.

  I downloaded everything manually and kept checking my processor after each installation/reboot. Everything worked fine until I installed the:

  * Intel platform dynamic and thermal setting driver *.

  After a reboot, the Task Manager showed once again to the top of the formidable GHz 2.28. I put a system restore point, just like windows has fully booted, before updating the drivers, so I decided to restore it at this point. No luck, the processor still be strangled. Because I have nothing to lose, once more, I do a reinstall full (which once more, the rolls be back to W8.1. After around an hour, the W10 up and running. I went to update all my drivers, exuding the platform driver and dynamic thermal setting, with reasonable success. The processor is no longer limited. The only problem, after installing the motion sensor driver, the HARD drive stopped spinning down. At this point, I don't have time to play, decided not to back down.

  Thus, at the end of the day, the culprit to my problems were the official DELL drivers:

  System utilities | Intel platform thermal and dynamic framework pilot (104 MB)

  &

  ST Microelectronics LNG3DMTR pilot sensor of movement (35 MB)

  With the new installation of Windows (and the Motion Sensor installed Driver), once more SFC/scannow found errors that cannot be repaired. Thorugh DISM, I managed to repair the image of the system, but the HARD drive always turns freely. More importantly, the limitation is GONE.

  Regarding your questions above, I don't have a chance to check if there is power or the current limit, but there's certainly been no thermal regulation. The CPU is still relatively fresh, and fans did turn, even if very quietly (now with the processor works properly the temperature rises up to 84 degrees (up 3.29 Ghz) and fans spin very hard under prolonged load).

  Regarding the HDD, no system or other utilities consulted the reader (analyses excluded antivirus, indexing and so forth that unchecked, the disc is only used as a manual backup). Even if the HARD drive isn't spinning down, no limit certainly makes life a lot easier. Ill wait for a new version of the driver for the motion detector see if it solves the problem, if not, disconnect the drive from the motherboard may be my only option.

  I don't know why the official Dell drivers could corrupt the file system, since they were after all, designed for this particular system, on this particular operating system. There are no other programs interfere with their installation and operation, given that the pilots were the first things to be updated.

  At the end of the day, I found the problem, it's a good step forward, but it seems that the resolution is out of my reach.

  Thanks for your help!

• Speed up the bqy open time

  Fairly new at Hyperion and I wanted to speed upward my bqy open time. I would like to record my bqy (after treatment) without the result set (using backup with the document from the query results) and thought that I might be able to filter the pivot or the report itself without the result set. Something like the right-click on the pivot and selecting 'focus on the points', but using a dashboard to send the item to filter. I use Hyperion 9.3 and opening the bqy helps interactive client web reporting.
  
  Is this feasible? No luck with something like ActiveDocument.Sections ["My hub"]. TopLabels ['my Nm of Col']. AddFilterValue ("[Division]", bqOperatorEqual)

  False limits are set of limits that ensure rows returned in your BQY that you have 0 (zero). So when you process the BQY all data disappeared but the objects still exist. Then, when you open the file it is empty and the pivot is empty. You must then process the file to refresh data.

  There are other ways to improve the performance of a bqy when it opens in the Interactive Web Client.

  • Save the zipped file before import into the workspace.
  
  
  • Save without results
  
  
  • If you want the file have given inside look at the request and see if you can return within data - data summarized for what you're trying to do.
  
  
  • See how you use calculated items, filters and the kinds in the results
  
  
  • Look at how many sections you out of your results section and what is their purpose
  
  

  without seeing the file or the needs of the business it supports, it is really hard to say what you can do to speed up the file.

  Hope it will be useful.

  Wayne Van Sluys
  TopDown Consulting

• iMac fan runs full speed after the migration wizard

  Hi, just a clean installed 10.9.5 BONES and then I used the migration assistant to transfer my backup time machine from my old computer. He made the transfer, took nearly 4 hours. Then when he was done he rebooted the computer, and as soon as he started the fans in the computer run at full speed. I have a small (HARD drive fan control) software that I have installed to see the temperature and it tells me 119F and fans are 4962 RPM. Why it does this?

  Once the computer restarts, it said it was computer optimization and it can affect performance, can that cause the problem of fan? I did e-mail importing and installing imessage and now I'm looking at the speed of the fan and it is now 118f 4638 RPM... always very noisy. This computer did not a fan NOISE until I migrated my data.  Help, please!

  IMac is a 3.06 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo

  4 GB OF RAM

  27 ", end of 2009

  1 TB harddrive

  Once the computer restarts, it said it was computer optimization and it can affect performance, can that cause the problem of fan?

  Yes. It should settle down after the Spotlight indexing. Which can take some time, depending on the number of files that needed to index.

  119 ° F is on the colder side of normal and no reason for concern.