Invalid block size Stored - Oracle 12 c DB in OEL6 installation error

Similar Questions

• dependent on the block size of oracle on the block o/s size

  Dear all,
  
  
  What is dependent on the block size of oracle on the size of block o/s?
  
  Concerning

  Oracle data block is the smallest logical unit to store oracle data and that's usually multiple o/s block size.

• Oracle Jinitiator 1.3.1.22 installation error in window7

  Hi all

  I have in my small agency

  Server system: Microsoft server windows 2003 Service Pack1(32bit) Oracle Application Server Enterprise Edition (10.1.2.0.2) 32-bit

  in the customer system access us the application IE: 6 OS: windowns xp (32 bit) through Oracle Jinitiator 1.3.1.22 works very well

  now the system of updating windows IE:8 7 (32 bit) Mei install oracle Jinitiator 1.3.1.22

  Cannot install the software completely IAM's problem as below:

  Oracle Jinitiator installation is complete. If you are using netscape as your web browser, you will need to close and restart before netscape

  using jinitiator.

  I have installation 1.3.1.26 installation also iam get the same problem.

  all can help me which Jinitiator is needed how to access the application in IE 8 window7

  
  

  Thank you

  Simply convert your installation of JInitiator/config in a jar of stand alone that will work with any new JRE (I use 1.6, but I think it also works for the 1.7), you just need to run the forms EXEJar and enter the URL of your application forms, the program will do the rest. You can download the tool here: http://www.talkingbyte.com/?p=3&productDownload=FormsEXEJar

• Block size is too small - reformat the data store or create files VMDk 2?

  Hello

  I'm new to VMware and so far I absolutely love everything about her!  Well, I was not too happy when I realized that I can't create more than 256 GB a drive without reformatting the VMFS datastore.   Apparently, I accepted the block size of 1 MB by default during the installation...   I now need to configure a file server with about 500 GB of storage.  The data store with a larger block size (4 MB would be fine for me) reformatting is easy enough?  I am currently working on the first host ESXi 4.1 and will move to set up 2 more hosts in the coming weeks.  I read somewhere on the forum that ESXi 4.0 doesn't let you change the block size by default of 1 MB - is this true or relevant to 4.1?

  Currently, I have only 2 small VMs on that host, and these can be easily saved and put offline for a few hours, if necessary.  When starting the server, I created a single RAID array that holds ESXi and all virtual machines - does that mean that I have to reinstall ESXi in order to increase the size of the block?

  An alternative that I can get to is to simply create 2 255 GB VMDK each and load distribution of storage in the guest operating system (Win 2008).   Performance wise, is a disc more great and better (or worse) than the two smaller disks?

  On a related note, what should I choose for the "Independent" option when you add a new virtual disk?  Default is disabled (not independent).

  Your thoughts, focus and expertise are welcome and will be greatly appreciated!

  Thanks in advance,

  Dothan

  Dothan,

  You should power (after the virtual machine backup) remove the current data store and create a new one with the new block size. I did not have this on ESXi 4.1 again, however, he worked on ESXi 4.0.

  The maximum size of VMDK. If you want ot be able to take pictures, make sure you subtract twice the size of block in GB of the documented maximum size.

  Block size 1 MB--> 254 GB (= 256 GB, 2 GB)

  Block size of 2 MB--> 508 GB (= 512 GB - 4 GB)

  Size of block 4 MB--> GB 1 016 (= 1 024 GB - 8 GB)

  Block size of 8 MB--> GB 2 032 (= 2 048 GB to 16 GB)

  André

  EDIT: Just the KB for the maximum sizes. http://KB.VMware.com/kb/1012384

• ORA-00344 (impossible to recreate the online newspaper) due to the OSD-04001 (invalid logical block size (BONE 512)

  Windows (well Yes...) Sorry)... Server 2008 Enterprise SP1

  Oracle 12.1.0.1

  I have provided a seller a COLD backup and a BACKUP CONTROLFILE to TRACE file.

  When they go to OPEN RESETLOGS ORA-00344, ora-27040, while they receive the operating system support (OSD-04001)

  I don't have access to the restoration site... so I'll have the seller try things... my next step is to change the db_block_size to 4096 vs 8192

  They are able to build the controlfile: CREATE CONTROLFILE SET DATABASE 'XXXXX' resetlogs noarchivelog

  the issue is in the open air

  It has even deleted the LOG file groups to let the o/s to build it... still committed an error... ideas?

  RESOLVED: redo block size must be a multiple of the db_block_size, which it was (512 k again and 8192 db).

  A few internet searches / messages supposed to reduce the db_block_size... we did it... to 4096 and it worked.  Don't know why it worked in an o/s to 8 k and had to be reduced to another (same configuration... supposedly)

• OS and Oracle block size block size

  [Condition] If the size of the block of BONE [512 b - 64K] is greater than the size of block Oracle [2K - 16K]

  Assume: BONES Block Size: 32K and Oracle block size: 8K

  Quebec: One-to-many relationship will always be true? or block Oracle will use 8K to 32 K, and the rest will be unused? or it will return the error at the time of the creation of the data file?

  This will challenge the relationship "one to many".

  Leader: Oracle logical and physical storage diagram.svg - Wikimedia Commons

  Refer to the basis of the diagram.

  " --------------------< "="" show's="" one="" to="" many="" relation.="" one="" x="" can="" contain="" many="">

  ">-------------------<" show's="" many="" to="" many"="" i.e="" many="" x="" can="" contain="" many="">

  You don't seem to be read or understand what everyone says.

  There is NO such "one to many" relationship. Like I said above

  There is no 'validation of one to many '.

  1. the operating system uses a given block size

  2. you choose an Oracle block size

  All these "one to many" is just the result of the choices you made in #2 above. There isn't any 'validation' that occur.

  This likely diagram shows this relationship based on the recommendation of Oracle to select a block size that is a multiple of the block size of OS. If you do that this diagram will NOT reflect the case of NORMAL use.

  You can't believe everything you see on the internet. Articles/diagrams and others are often from unknown or reliable sources.

  2.

  'Validation' is not any process.

  I just wanted to write the Validation of the theory, the relationship.

  Re-read what I just said again above.

  There is NO validation. There is NO theory of validation.

  All there is is the reality of the block size, you choose and the reality of the OS block size you use. Any relationship between these two values is just a reflection of these two values.

  If you choose two different values, they have a completely different relationship to each other.

  Oracle works with blocks of the Oracle. The operating system works with the BONE blocks. Oracle does not care really what size a block of BONE is in connection with an Oracle block.

• Oracle and the segment size of external storage block size

  Hi all.
  I have a storage which will host an instance of Oracle data files. The RAID should be configured and for this, my colleague needs set the segment size. Its options are 16 k, 32 k, 64 k.
  The db Oracle will essentially the size of block 8 k value. The oracle block size must be synchronized with the size of the minimum of 16 k segment?
  How this change may affect performance?
  Thank you.

  rp0428, nice answer.

  Balu, as I suggested use 64K and call it a day.

  HTH - Mark D Powell.

  Edited by: Mark D Powell on August 10, 2012 12:12

• in regards to oracle block size os and monobloc io call!

  Hi all
  
  My db(10gr2) block size is 8 k, and
  the BP is on the file system raw device on an aix machine.
  
  OS block size is 512 KB.
  
  How block is read from disk when a call to io unique oracle occurs?
  Which is current, 8K, or 512K?
  
  If the block size for a single e/s call depends on the size of the bone (512 k) block,
  I think that the os block size need to be tuned for oracle block size (8 k).
  
  If we use the raw device file system, operating system level block size has no meaning?
  
  
  Thanks in advance.
  Best regards.

  Hello
  Please refer to the following oracle doc:

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B28359_01/server.111/b32009/appa_aix.htm

  excerpt from it:

  Setting the database block size

  You can configure the Oracle database block size for a higher flow of input-output. On AIX, you can set the value of the initialization parameter DB_BLOCK_SIZE for between 2 KB and 32 KB, with a default value of 4 KB. If the Oracle database is installed on a journaled file system, then the block size must be a multiple of the block size in file system (4 KB on JFS, 16 K to 1 MB on GPFS). For databases on raw partitions, the Oracle database block size is a multiple of the physical block (512 bytes on AIX) operating system size.

  Thank you and best regards,
  Raj K.

• block size histogram

  Hello

  I would like to know if there is an option to get a histogram to remake written in a time block size.

  The output should be in the same format of the histogram of event wait but for block sizes

  Thank you

  A quick answer to that is to pass to 12.1 and write some code against v$ sysstat, which brings together the following statistics:

  again writing to the size (4KB)

  again writing account size (8 KB)

  again writing to the size (16KB)

  again writing account size (32KB)

  again writing account size (64KB)

  again writing to the size (128KB)

  again writing account size (256KB)

  again writing account size (512KB)

  again writing account size (1 024 KB)

  again writing account size (inf)

  I don't think there is a way to get similar results in earlier versions of Oracle.

  Respect of

  Jonathan Lewis

• Can't choose one block size, another from 8 KB to 12 c DBCA

  DB version: 12.1.0.2.4 (July 2015, power supply)

  OS: Oracle Linux 6.6

  I tried to create a database using DBCA. But the drop-down list is disabled, as shown below.

  I tried to click on "All initialization parameters" circled in red above. But I don't get to change the value 8 to another

  

  My network connection has been a little slow. But I don't think that this has nothing to do with this issue.

  If you have chosen a database template that includes data files, then the block size will be limited to the size of the block of data that was originally from the model.

• Error ORA-19502 writing on the file ' / INT1/arch/D/arch_1_1629_754400291.dbf ', block number 94209 (block size = 1024), ORA-27072

  Hi all

  In my database DVLUX226, in the alert logs, I get error ORA-19502. partners to archive newspapers. Here are the details:

  Wed Apr 16 18:26:58 2014

  Errors in the /INT1/sw/D/oracle/diag/rdbms/dvlux226/DVLUX226/trace/DVLUX226_arc1_22234.trc file:

  ORA-19502: write error on file ' / INT1/arch/D/arch_1_1629_754400291.dbf ', block number 94209 (block size = 1024)

  ORA-27072: IO file error

  HP-UX-ia64 error: 2: no such file or directory

  Additional information: 4

  Additional information: 94209

  Additional information: 638976

  Wed Apr 16 18:27:11 2014

  ARCH: Stopped archiving, error occurred. Will continue to retry

  ORACLE Instance DVLUX226 - check-in error

  ORA-16014: log 3 sequence # 1629 not archived, not available destinations

  ORA-00312: wire 3 1 online journal: ' / INT1/oraredo2a/D/DVLUX226/redo03.log'

  Errors in the /INT1/sw/D/oracle/diag/rdbms/dvlux226/DVLUX226/trace/DVLUX226_arc0_22231.trc file:

  ORA-16014: log 3 sequence # 1629 not archived, not available destinations

  ORA-00312: wire 3 1 online journal: ' / INT1/oraredo2a/D/DVLUX226/redo03.log'

  SQL > select * from v version $;

  BANNER

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64 bit Production

  PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production

  CORE Production 11.1.0.7.0

  AMT for HP - UX: 11.1.0.7.0 - Production Version

  NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production

  Please let me know how can I manipulate this alert as seems its related archive.

  Kind regards

  Michel

  > - rw - rw - 1 int1orad s/n 99222528 Apr 15 15:27 arch_1_1628_754400291.dbf

  > - rw - rw - 1 int1orad s/n 99222528 Apr 18 03:24 arch_1_1629_754400291.dbf

  What happened between Apr 15 15:27 and 18 April 03:24?

• storage on the block sizes and vmfs5 issue

  We just bought a new table with a feature called FlashDisk SSD read caching.

  the implementation of suppliers of this technology is the following: it basically puts cached applications frequently read blocks that are 16 KB or smaller in dedicated controller SSD, up to 1.6 TB per controller.

  We worry about what we paid extra money for SSD read cache and I was wondering if it will ever come into play because VMFS5 file system uses the block size of 1 MB.

  WE have Oracle DB currently set to use 8 k block size.  Now if VMFS collects the Oracle 8 KB please and puts them in blocks of 1 MB, then Im I right to believe that the read SSD cache pool will never be used?  y at - it a way to allow the Oracle 8 KB blocks to get to take advantage of the SSD cache using file vmfs5 reading system?  or is the necessary RDM here?

  Thank you!

  Now if VMFS collects the Oracle 8 KB please and puts them in blocks of 1 MB, then Im I right to believe that the read SSD cache pool will never be used?

  No, your assumption is incorrect. The size of the block VMFS is only for the sake of allocation/address of the files on the will. The size of the block VMFS has no influence IO issued by the virtual machines.

  This means that a request for/o 8 k of a VM will arrive as an application of e/s of the same 8 KB on the backend storage.

  The VMFS block size is completely independent and transparent to both, the back-end storage device and the behavior of the computers own IO virtual.

• Pointer of RDM / vmfs block size?

  We run ESX 4.0 on Dell R710s connect to a network SAN IBM N-Series on CF.

  This week we had a major outage due to a server RedHat MySQL fall.

  Off firstly the server wouldn't boot past virtual POST-sachant a RDM disk I have it deleted from the configuration. The server would then boot to OS, but every time that the ROW was reconnected it would either fall or unbootable.

  I remembered we had farily recently expanded space on this server and the RDM was now 300 GB in size. However the space used was only 85% on the lun (255GB). Then I remembered the limits of block size. The server was sitting on a partition vmfs with a block size of 1 MB (256GB max). So I removed the RDM and svMotion had the server in a data store that have a block size of 2MB, reconnected the RDM and the server starts very well. After a consistency check DB we were back running.

  This survey of fault, I went to read the document of maximum rates of the white paper

  http://www.VMware.com/PDF/vSphere4/R40/vsp_40_config_max.PDF

  to be honest - had some vague information on RDM

  and then I found VMware KB

  http://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US & cmd = displayKC & externalId = 1029697

  surprising to me, which clearly states the pointer RDM files are affected by the block vmfs sizes.

  However, there is a difference of opinion in this thread

  http://communities.VMware.com/message/1507498

  And look further in my own environment, we have several production server running with connected RDM which are excessive in size until the limits of said block size.

  I need clarity defined on it because as he sits down we could have several production machines in an unstable state, or I'm just left with no explanation for the disc lock, we witnessed and a power outage that caused a substantial loss of business.

  concerning
  wolfsonmicro

  Post edited by: wolfsonmicro Click accidental - it is always a request without response

  My understanding is that the LUN cannot be greater than the maximum size supported by the data store on that of RDM file pointer is created.  Pointer RDM file does not need to be stored on the same data store, Setup or other files vmdk files, for example you could have moved the file pointer RDM from a store of data with a larger block and left the vmx file and the data store other files vmdk with a block of 1 MB.

  Are you sure that files of pointer RDM for running virtual machines, you have on data with blocksizes warehouses NOT supporting the LUN size they point?

• restore the block size of buffer on ASM journal

  I know that redo logs are not written using oracle block size but with OS block size.
  
  When we put our recovery logs in ASM what is the block size used for redo?
  
  Thanks in advance

  Please see below link

  http://www.DBA-Oracle.com/t_redo_logs_multiple_disk_blocksize.htm

  I hope this should help,

  Concerning
  http://www.oracleracexpert.com
  Compatibility matrix and Oracle version support
  http://www.oracleracexpert.com/2012/05/Oracle-version-compatibility-and.html
  ORA-01427: einreihig subquery returns multiple rows
  http://www.oracleracexpert.com/2012/05/ora-01427-single-row-subquery-returns.html

• How to create a store of data with the small block size

  Hello

  I want to create a data store on two 160 GB drives. All the VI Client allows me to do is to create a data store of whole disc with 1 MB block. But for reasons of performance with the virtualized Oracle RAC, which is 8K organized, I want to go down to a smaller block size. But how?

  Is it possible to split my drive to (lets say) four parts, each with a smaller block size and putting them all together like extends in a data store? To create partitions with fdisk does not work, as the VI Client wants to use the unpartitioned disk. Any ideas?

  Robert

  Hello

  It is not possible. The smallest block size is 1 MB on a VMFS partition.

  Best regards

  Lars Liljeroth

  -