MERGE or PL/SQL statement? (and ORA-30926: failed to get a stable set of rows in the source tables)

Similar Questions

• Using Merge in oracle 11g this error SQL Error: ORA-30926: failed to get a stable set of rows in the source tables

  whenever I run this code I get this error

  SQL Error: ORA-30926: failed to get a stable set of rows in the source tables

  30926 00000 - "impossible to get a stable set of rows in the source tables.

  * Cause: A stable set of rows could not be achieved due to the large dml

  activity or one not deterministic where clause.

  * Action: Remove any non deterministic of the clauses and reissue of the dml.

  Don't know wht goes wrong!
  

  
  

  SQL:

  MERGE IN VENDORS_ACTIVE_DATE s

  USING (nvl (d.VENDOR, s.VENDOR) selection of the SELLER,

  NVL (d.COMPANY_CODE, s.COMPANY_CODE) COMPANY_CODE.

  (case when ((d.VENDOR = s.VENDOR) and (d.COMPANY_CODE = s.COMPANY_CODE)))

  )

  then "MATCH".

  When d.COMPANY_CODE is null

  then 'DELETE '.

  When s.COMPANY_CODE is null

  then "INSERT."

  else 'UPDATE '.

  chck end)

  from (select * from VENDORS_ACTIVE_DATE where COMPANY_CODE = 2) s

  full outer join (select * provider where COMPANY_CODE = 2) d

  on (d.COMPANY_CODE = s.COMPANY_CODE AND s.COMPANY_CODE = 2)

  ) d

  WE (d.COMPANY_CODE = s.COMPANY_CODE AND d.chck in ('UPDATE', 'GAME', 'DELETE'))

  WHEN MATCHED THEN

  UPDATE SET s.VENDOR = d.VENDOR

  WHERE d.chck in ('UPDATE', 'DELETE')

  DELETE WHERE d.chck = 'DELETE '.

  WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN

  INSERT (SELLER, COMPANY_CODE)

  VALUES (d.VENDOR, d.COMPANY_CODE)

  Work request: (deleted the duplicate data in tables (source and target))

  MERGE IN VENDORS_ACTIVE_DATE s

  USING (nvl (d.VENDOR, s.VENDOR) selection of the SELLER,

  NVL (d.ACTIVEDATE, s.ACTIVEDATE) ACTIVEDATE.

  NVL (d.COMPANY_CODE, s.COMPANY_CODE) COMPANY_CODE.

  (case when ((d.VENDOR = s.VENDOR))

  - AND D.ACTIVEDATE = S.ACTIVEDATE

  and NVL (d.ACTIVEDATE, trunc (sysdate)) = NVL (s.ACTIVEDATE, trunc (sysdate))

  and (d.COMPANY_CODE = s.COMPANY_CODE)

  )

  then "MATCH".

  When d.COMPANY_CODE is null

  then 'DELETE '.

  When s.COMPANY_CODE is null

  then "INSERT."

  else 'UPDATE '.

  chck end)

  from (select * from suppliers where COMPANY_CODE = 2) d

  full outer join (select * from vendors_active_date where COMPANY_CODE = 2) s

  on (d.COMPANY_CODE = s.COMPANY_CODE and s.vendor = d.vendor)

  ) d

  WE (d.COMPANY_CODE = s.COMPANY_CODE AND d.VENDOR = s.VENDOR AND d.chck in ('UPDATE', 'GAME', 'DELETE'))

  WHEN MATCHED THEN

  S.ACTIVEDATE = UPDATE SET d.ACTIVEDATE

  WHERE d.chck in ('UPDATE', 'DELETE')

  DELETE WHERE d.chck = 'DELETE '.

  WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN

  INSERT (VENDOR, ACTIVEDATE, COMPANY_CODE)

  VALUES (d.VENDOR, d.ACTIVEDATE, d.COMPANY_CODE)

• FUSION IN: ORA-30926: failed to get a stable set of rows in the source tables

  Hi all

  Database Oracle 12 c Enterprise Edition Release 12.1.0.1.0 - 64 bit Production 0
  

  PL/SQL Release 12.1.0.1.0 - Production 0

  CORE 12.1.0.1.0 Production 0

  AMT for 64-bit Windows: Version 12.1.0.1.0 - Production 0

  NLSRTL Version 12.1.0.1.0 - Production 0

  When you use the MERGE clause, if executed more than once, I get the below error

  ORA-30926: failed to get a stable set of rows in the source tables

  create table CBC (nums number, sname varchar2 (10))

  create tar (tnum number, tNom varchar2 (10)) table

  Insert in src values (1, 'a')

  Insert in src values (1, 'b')

  Insert in src values (2, "c")

  merge into tar

  using the CBC

  on (nums = tnum)

  when matched

  then

  update the value tNom = sname

  When not matched

  then

  Insert the values(snum,sname);

  What expect, it's that first time itself (when inserted), he must raise the error. But it's not.

  Select * from tar

  TNUM TNOM

  1 b

  1 a

  2 c

  But if we run for the second time it shows the error.

  I saw the document of the Oracle and he said

  MERGEis a deterministic statement. You cannot update the same row in the target table multiple times in the same MERGE statement.

  I've seen below cela son but failed to get the solution for this.

  MERGE STATEMENT ORA-30926: failed to get a stable set of lines in the source

  Nondeterministic fusion?

  Someone at - it make a clarification?

  I don't want to insert records into the first time itself. for example, to run the first time he must raise the error. can I do this using MERGE?

  Thank you

  Hello

  O - O wrote:

  Thanks knani, Frank.

  One more doubt.

  When you run the MERGE statement, the first time, there is no rows in the target table, so no rows in the target table is what it is.

  So we cannot perform below sqls using MERGE when the target table is empty?

  insert into tar values (1, 'a')

  updated tar tNom = 'b' set where tnum = 1

  insert into tar values (2, "c")

  Is - that means that the MERGER will be only works with validated data?

  Right; a MERGE statement will not update a line which has been previously inserted into the same MERGE statement.  All fact tables reference to the data in the tables by the time the MERGER began.

• ORA-30926: failed to get a stable set of rows in the source table

  Dear all
  
  When I try to load my cube I get the error "ora-30926: failed to get a stable set of rows in the source table.
  Any idea? Googling for this error has not returned all the solutions.
  
  My env:
  
  Source: Oracle 10g (10.2.x)
  Target: Oracle 11g (11.1.0.7)
  
  I use the generator to warehouse 11.1.0.7 on Linux
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  Yes, I'm very sure. The error is revived by the MERGE statement.
  If the cube is empty, it is not a problem. All of the rows from the source Gets a surrogate key.
  If you run the cube for the second time, and you have two or more lines with exact in the attributes values as you use for correspondence, this error occurs.

  Kind regards
  Carsten.

• ORA-30926: failed to get a stable set of rows in the source tables

  Hello

  Please suggest me I get the error message when running under code MERG. Please suggest

  Below the two tables are the same in the code not to structure no change that I just need to update the real table when data in the temporary table.

  MERGE WITH CEMLI_ASSESMENT CM

  USING (SELECT DISTINCT * FROM TEMP_CEMLI_ASSESMENT) TCM

  WE (CM.PRO_ID = TCM.PRO_ID AND)

  CM CEMLI_NAME THE GROUP TCM. CEMLI_NAME)

  WHEN MATCHED THEN

  GAME UPDATE

  CM CEMLI_TYPE THE GROUP TCM. CEMLI_TYPE,

  CM CEMLI_CODE_UNIT_EXEC THE GROUP TCM. CEMLI_CODE_UNIT_EXEC,

  CM LAST_USAGE_DT THE GROUP TCM. LAST_USAGE_DT,

  CM REQUIRED GROUP TCM. Mandatory

  CM.COMPLEXITY = TCM.COMPLEXITY,

  CM HIT THE GROUP TCM. AFFECTED,

  CM RE_DEVELOPMENT THE GROUP TCM. RE_DEVELOPMENT,

  CM IMPACT_DESC THE GROUP TCM. IMPACT_DESC,

  CM CEMLI_GROUP THE GROUP TCM. CEMLI_GROUP,

  CM REVISED_COMPLEXITY THE GROUP TCM. REVISED_COMPLEXITY,

  CM RETRO_PLANNED_START_DT THE GROUP TCM. RETRO_PLANNED_START_DT,

  CM RETRO_PLANNED_END_DT THE GROUP TCM. RETRO_PLANNED_END_DT,

  CM RETRO_ACTUAL_START_DT THE GROUP TCM. RETRO_ACTUAL_START_DT,

  CM RETRO_ACTUAL_END_DT THE GROUP TCM. RETRO_ACTUAL_END_DT,

  CM FUT_PLANNED_START_DT THE GROUP TCM. FUT_PLANNED_START_DT,

  CM FUT_PLANNED_END_DT THE GROUP TCM. FUT_PLANNED_END_DT,

  CM FUT_ACTUAL_START_DT THE GROUP TCM. FUT_ACTUAL_START_DT,

  CM FUT_ACTUAL_END_DT THE GROUP TCM. FUT_ACTUAL_END_DT,

  CM UPDATE_FLG THE GROUP TCM. UPDATE_FLG,

  CM.COMMENTS = TCM.COMMENTS

  WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN

  INSERT (CM.PRO_ID, CM. CEMLI_NAME, CM. CEMLI_TYPE, CM. CEMLI_CODE_UNIT_EXEC, CM. LAST_USAGE_DT, CM. IF NECESSARY, CM.COMPLEXITY, CM. HIT, CM. RE_DEVELOPMENT, CM. IMPACT_DESC, CM. CEMLI_GROUP, CM. REVISED_COMPLEXITY, CM. RETRO_PLANNED_START_DT, CM. RETRO_PLANNED_END_DT, CM. RETRO_ACTUAL_START_DT, CM. RETRO_ACTUAL_END_DT, CM. FUT_PLANNED_START_DT, CM. FUT_PLANNED_END_DT, CM. FUT_ACTUAL_START_DT, CM. FUT_ACTUAL_END_DT, CM. UPDATE_FLG, CM.COMMENTS)

  VALUES (TCM.PRO_ID, TCM. CEMLI_NAME, TCM. CEMLI_TYPE, TCM. CEMLI_CODE_UNIT_EXEC, TCM. LAST_USAGE_DT, TCM. IF NECESSARY, TCM.COMPLEXITY, TCM. HIT, TCM. RE_DEVELOPMENT, TCM. IMPACT_DESC, TCM. CEMLI_GROUP, TCM. REVISED_COMPLEXITY, TCM. RETRO_PLANNED_START_DT, TCM. RETRO_PLANNED_END_DT, TCM. RETRO_ACTUAL_START_DT, TCM. RETRO_ACTUAL_END_DT, TCM. FUT_PLANNED_START_DT, TCM. FUT_PLANNED_END_DT, TCM. FUT_ACTUAL_START_DT, TCM. FUT_ACTUAL_END_DT, TCM. UPDATE_FLG, TCM.COMMENTS);

  Thank you

  Shilpa

  This means that there are several lines in traditional Chinese with the same TCM.PRO_ID and TCM. CEMLI_NAME. And the MERGER cannot be updated same line several times. You must decide what to do in such cases. If you don't care which line of lines with the same TCM.PRO_ID and TCM. CEMLI_NAME to take, use:

  MERGE WITH CEMLI_ASSESMENT CM
  WITH THE HELP OF TCM (SELECT T.*, ROW_NUMER () OVER(PARTITION BY PRO_ID,CEMLI_NAME ORDER BY 1) RN TEMP_CEMLI_ASSESMENT T)
  WE (CM.PRO_ID = TCM.PRO_ID AND)
  CM CEMLI_NAME THE GROUP TCM. CEMLI_NAME AND
  TCM. RN = 1)
  WHEN MATCHED THEN
  GAME UPDATE
  CM CEMLI_TYPE THE GROUP TCM. CEMLI_TYPE,
  CM CEMLI_CODE_UNIT_EXEC THE GROUP TCM. CEMLI_CODE_UNIT_EXEC,
  CM LAST_USAGE_DT THE GROUP TCM. LAST_USAGE_DT,
  CM REQUIRED GROUP TCM. Mandatory
  CM.COMPLEXITY = TCM.COMPLEXITY,
  CM HIT THE GROUP TCM. AFFECTED,
  CM RE_DEVELOPMENT THE GROUP TCM. RE_DEVELOPMENT,
  CM IMPACT_DESC THE GROUP TCM. IMPACT_DESC,
  CM CEMLI_GROUP THE GROUP TCM. CEMLI_GROUP,
  CM REVISED_COMPLEXITY THE GROUP TCM. REVISED_COMPLEXITY,
  CM RETRO_PLANNED_START_DT THE GROUP TCM. RETRO_PLANNED_START_DT,
  CM RETRO_PLANNED_END_DT THE GROUP TCM. RETRO_PLANNED_END_DT,
  CM RETRO_ACTUAL_START_DT THE GROUP TCM. RETRO_ACTUAL_START_DT,
  CM RETRO_ACTUAL_END_DT THE GROUP TCM. RETRO_ACTUAL_END_DT,
  CM FUT_PLANNED_START_DT THE GROUP TCM. FUT_PLANNED_START_DT,
  CM FUT_PLANNED_END_DT THE GROUP TCM. FUT_PLANNED_END_DT,
  CM FUT_ACTUAL_START_DT THE GROUP TCM. FUT_ACTUAL_START_DT,
  CM FUT_ACTUAL_END_DT THE GROUP TCM. FUT_ACTUAL_END_DT,
  CM UPDATE_FLG THE GROUP TCM. UPDATE_FLG,
  CM.COMMENTS = TCM.COMMENTS

  SY.

• [Error code: 904, SQL State: 42000] ORA-00904: "G". "' NAME ': invalid

  When I run the SQL below, I get the following:
  
  08:00:08 [SELECT - 0 row (s), dry 0.000] [error Code: 904, SQL State: 42000] ORA-00904: "G". "" NAME ": invalid identifier
  
  When I comment the lines "BOLD", it works fine. I tried to fully qualify the column without success. I'm sure it's a matter of formatting.
  
  ************************************************
  
  Select
  SR. SCHOOLID,
  SR. StudentID, sr.coursenumber,
  SR. REGISTREQ_ID,
  (select
  min (rr.ID |) » -'|| URI COURSEGROUP)
  Of
  REGISTREQ rr
  where
  RR.grade_level = (select s.sched_nextyeargrade from student s where s.id = sr.studentid)
  and rr.yearid = 2100
  and rr.id not in (6426,6415)
  and rr. COURSEGROUP in
  (select
  g.Name
  Of
  g GEN
  where
  g.CAT = "coursegroups".
  and instr (g.valuet, sr.coursenumber) > 0
  and g.schoolid = sr.schoolid)
  and ((g.name as 'ALT %' and sr. GLOBALALTERNATECOURSE = 1)
  or (g.name not as 'ALT %' and sr. GLOBALALTERNATECOURSE = 0))
  ) as New_RegID
  Of
  SCHEDULEREQUESTS sr
  where
  SR. SCHOOLID = 703
  and sr.yearid = 2100

  This is because the lines that you have Ringing are out of reach for the alias 'g', which is part of the inner query.

  Maybe you want to just 'name' without the prefix "g.".

• When you try to install fix - it files, diagnostic and cleaning Center. I get a message that it is in the wrong format

  original title: format of the troubleshooting tool

  When you try to install fix - it files, diagnostic and cleaning Center. I get a message that it is in the wrong format. How can I fix it so I can clean or remove the unwanted [for example registry files]?

  Hi RandyHunter,

  1. what you trying to accomplish?

  2. What is the question you are facing on the computer?

  3. you try to install Microsoft fixit tool?

  4. did you of recent changes on the computer?

  If you try to install Microsoft fixit tool then I would suggest that you post your query in the Sub forum mentioned.

  http://social.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/fixitcenter/threads

  Your question does contain all the required information necessary for us to help you. Please provide more relevant information to continue troubleshooting as a result.

• Error: ORA-16757: failed to get the value of this property

  Hi all
  I have an error:
  DGMGRL > see the database dbname_stb LogXptStatus;
  Error: ORA-16757: failed to get the value of this property
  I check:
  DGMGRL > see the configuration;
  
  Configuration - dbname_dg
  
  Protection mode: MaxPerformance
  Databases:
  dbname_pr - primary database
  dbname_stb - physical of the standby database
  
  Fast-Start Failover: DISABLED
  
  The configuration status:
  SUCCESS
  
  drcdbname_stb.log:
  RSM0: Received the request the property Get: rid = 0 x 01010000, pid = 54
  2012-10-17 15:21:14.702 of database Resource: get the LogXptStatus property
  RSM 15:21:14.702 2012-10-17 error: trying to interview a 'LogXptStatus' primary type property on a standby database resource.
  2012 10-17 error 15:21:14.702 database resource GetProperty (16501,16757)
  
  I don't understand this error?
  Thank you all.

  Take a look on this

  Re: ORA-00254 | Trouble with dataguard

• MV for replication. No PK in the source table and the LOB column

  I would like to replicate tables between 2 instances in 2 different hosts. Mixed 11 GR 1 material and Oracle 10 g 2. I have my doubts:
  
  1. some tables from the source is not PK, and I understand that MV with rowid is not supported. Is there no workaround known workaround on this case without changing the structure of the source table? Full/complete update is acceptable.
  
  2 one of the table has the CLOB data type. Can I just ignore this column in MV? A known issue with this kind of approach?

  #1. You must use WITH ROWID MV and I believe it is supported up to the latest version, unless you can find any document, please give me the code of Notes.
  #2. CLOB column is supported in MV, so no need to jump.

• Interrupted SQL statement and start several times with several SQL_EXEC_ID

  Hi all

  We meet a strange phenomenon, maybe someone can help.

  We see that sometimes, when our client runs a single statement, implemented Oracle to process the statement with a special SQL_EXEC_ID, but after a while stops and starts processing the statement along with different SQL_EXEC_ID. Then, after a while, it happens again - stop Oracle processes the statement and start from the beginning with the new SQL_EXEC_ID. This happens again and again until we kill all of the other sessions on the database (then it ends).

  What we see exactly: Client executes the statement (sql_id = "2tp7pz6yv87qp"). Monitor us v $ SQL_MONITOR and get this:

  SELECT Sql_id, sql_exec_id, to_char (SQL_EXEC_START, "HH24:MI:SS MON-DD-YYYY) SQL_EXEC_START, status OF V$ SQL_MONITOR where sql_id = '2tp7pz6yv87qp' ORDER BY SQL_EXEC_START DESC;

  2tp7pz6yv87qp 16777216 28 may 2015 07:19:14 the EXECUTION

  After a while check us again and see this:

  2tp7pz6yv87qp 16777217 28 may 2015 07:36:17 the EXECUTION

  2tp7pz6yv87qp 16777216 28 may 2015 07:19:14 FACT

  After a while, we see this:

  2tp7pz6yv87qp 16777219 28 may 2015 08:09:58 the EXECUTION

  2tp7pz6yv87qp 16777218 28 may 2015 07:53:37 FACT

  2tp7pz6yv87qp 16777217 28 may 2015 07:36:17 FACT

  2tp7pz6yv87qp 16777216 28 may 2015 07:19:14 FACT

  and so on — will happen again and again until we kill all of the other sessions in the database.

  When comparing the follow-up of the different SQL_EXEC_IDs SQL reports, we see that each of them did exactly the same job: used the same execution plan, beginning treatment she even read/wrote the same amount of e/s and each of them stopped at the same point during execution. You can see that for each SQL_EXEC_ID execution 'stops' in the middle and never reach the end of the plan. She always stops in the JOIN by HASH and never continue to the next steps in the implementation plan.

  When you look more deeply, we see in V$ ACTIVE_SESSION_HISTORY always last thing that happens for every SQL_EXEC_ID is HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER (SQL_PLAN_OPERATION = HASH and SQL_PLAN_OPTIONS = RIGHT OUTER JOIN). Then comes the new SQL_EXEC_ID and it starts to do the same thing as the previous SQL_EXEC_ID did when it was launched.

  Kill all other sessions, run finally ends. We see that the final (successful) SQL_EXEC_ID work and completes his plan to run to completion.

  When executing the same single statement (when it comes to the single session in the database), it ends with a single SQL_EXEC_ID. Its SQL monitoring report looks like the final execution when the phenomenon occurs after killing all other sessions.

  -We checked that the customer executing the query only once. AWR also only shows simple execution of the query.

  -We have reproduced in many different clients (plus SQL, JDBC thin client OIC and DBMS_SCHEDULER job).

  -It has no PARALLEL in the query or table.

  -In this case for different statements (different INSERT-SELECT and MERGE instructions).

  -Version: Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64 bit Production

  Does anyone have an idea?

  Finally found the root cause of the problem.

  This phenomenon occurs when the cursor of the active query being invalidated. This can occur in several scenarios, in our case, what happens when we work on a single partition (read or write) and perform DDL operations on different partitions of the same or the tables.

  Steps to reproduce:

  1 launch long command DML that affect the single partition

  2. in the course of executing this SQL, do one of the following values in a session different all 1 minute:

  2.1 do the indexes to a different partition unusable: ALTER TABLE X EDIT PARTITION Y UNUSABLE LOCAL INDEX

  2.2 rebuild the unusable index of different partition: ALTER TABLE X EDIT PARTITION Y REBUILD UNUSABLE LOCAL INDEX

  2.3 a partition different truncate

  Support of Oracle we were told that this problem is known and there are several requests for bugs and improvements thereon, for example this one:

  Bug 12905327 : TRUNCATE to an INVALID PARTITION TABLE UNNECESSARILY IMMEDIATELY all THE SLIDERS

  In our case (ETL process), we used to perform all these operations DDL and DML operations long (we work on different partitions in parallel). In order to solve, we have separated these operations to the different phases in our process and don't be DDL and DML operations at the same time more. This solved the problem for us.

• ORA-19573: failed to get exclusive enqueue for datafile 4

  Hello
  
  I have the database to Oracle 10 g on AIX.
  I take a full backup since the database isn't that big.
  The users.dbf has been deleted accidentally at the OS level.
  I'm trying to restore and recover the users tablespace. I'm rman documentation and that's what I tried to do.
  RMAN > run {}
  SQL 'alter tablespace offline users;
  Restore tablespace users;
  recover tablespace users;
  SQL 'alter tablespace users online ';
  }
  
  but I get the error below:
  using the control file of the target instead of recovery catalog database
  SQL statement: alter tablespace users offline
  RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
  RMAN-00569: = ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS =.
  RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
  RMAN-03009: failure of the sql command to the default channel at 14/04/2010 18:04:38
  RMAN-11003: failure in parsing / execution of the SQL statement: alter tablespace users offline
  ORA-01116: error opening the database file 4
  ORA-01110: data file 4: ' / u01/app/oracle/oradata/BKUPDB/users01.dbf'
  ORA-27041: could not open the file
  IBM AIX RISC System/6000 error: 2: no such file or directory
  Additional information: 3
  
  
  I did some research and it looks like I need to close the database, bring it back to get State and then do the restore and recover.
  I thought since storage space is not SYSTEM, I should be able to make the tablespace recovery without putting the database in offline mode.
  
  Can someone help me understand.
  
  Thank you.

  "alter tablespace offline users" is a NORMAL offline trying to control point the data file.

  Make an "alter tablespace users offline immediate.

  Hemant K Collette

• Formulation of condition CQL with the source table and Javabean event

  Hello
  
  I managed to create a State in CQL that compares 2 values of TIMESTAMP between a source table and a Java bean.
  
  I did this by complying with the standard DATETIME SimpleDateFormat in the docs.
  
  But the format does not include milliseconds. Is there another way I can do this, without losing the value of millisecond of the Javabean?
  
  The request is something like
  
  Select table.*
  table, beans
  where table.sometimestamp < bean.startdate
  and table.sometimestamp > bean.enddate
  
  
  where bean.startdate and bean.enddate is a java.util.Date? (or all)
  
  I tried all kinds of combinations like to_timestamp (bean.startdate.getTime ()) but it is not the correct timestamp.
  
  Also tried to use types of java.sql. * but came through different CQL syntax errors.
  
  
  Any tips?
  
  Thank you!
  Jarell

  Hello

  I think you have two options:

  (1) to use SimpleDateFormat the of ' pattern. For example: "' yyMMddHHmmssSS', where the last two are the number of milliseconds.

  2) keep as a long (e.g. System.currentTimeMillis)

  Best regards
  Alex

• Add more than 2 lines for a select statement without inserting rows in the base table

  Hi all
  
  I have a below a simple select statement that is querying a table.
  
  Select * from STUDY_SCHED_INTERVAL_TEMP
  where STUDY_KEY = 1063;
  
  but here's the situation. As you can see its return 7 ranks. But I must add
  2 rows more... with everything else, default or what exist... except the adding more than 2 lines.
  I can't insert in the base table. I want my results to end incrementing by 2 days in
  measurement_date_Taken on 01-APR-09... so big measurement_date_taken expected to
  end at study_end_Date...
  
  
  
  IS IT STILL POSSIBLE WITHOUT INSERT ROWS IN THE TABLE AND PLAYIHY ALL AROUND WITH
  THE SELECT STATEMENT?
  
  Sorry if this is confusing... I'm on 10.2.0.3
  
  Published by: S2K on August 13, 2009 14:19

  Well, I don't know if this request is as beautiful as my lawn, but seems to work even when ;)
  I used the "simplified" version, but the principle should work for your table, S2K.
  As Frank has already pointed out (and I fell on it while clunging): simply select your already existing lines and union them with the 'missing documents', you calculate the number of days that you are "missing" based on the study_end_date:

  MHO%xe> alter session set nls_date_language='AMERICAN';
  
  Sessie is gewijzigd.
  
  Verstreken: 00:00:00.01
  MHO%xe> with t as ( -- generating your data here, simplified by me due to cat and lawn
    2  select 1063 study_key
    3  ,      to_date('01-MAR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') phase_start_date
    4  ,      to_date('02-MAR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') measurement_date_taken
    5  ,      to_date('01-APR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') study_end_date
    6  from dual union all
    7  select 1063, to_date('03-MAR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') , to_date('04-MAR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') , to_date('01-APR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') from dual union all
    8  select 1063, to_date('03-MAR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') , to_date('09-MAR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') , to_date('01-APR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') from dual union all
    9  select 1063, to_date('03-MAR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') , to_date('14-MAR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') , to_date('01-APR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') from dual union all
   10  select 1063, to_date('03-MAR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') , to_date('19-MAR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') , to_date('01-APR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') from dual union all
   11  select 1063, to_date('22-MAR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') , to_date('23-MAR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') , to_date('01-APR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') from dual union all
   12  select 1063, to_date('22-MAR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') , to_date('30-MAR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') , to_date('01-APR-09', 'dd-mon-rr') from dual
   13  ) -- actual query:
   14  select study_key
   15  ,      phase_start_date
   16  ,      measurement_date_taken
   17  ,      study_end_date
   18  from   t
   19  union all
   20  select study_key
   21  ,      phase_start_date
   22  ,      measurement_date_taken + level -- or rownum
   23  ,      study_end_date
   24  from ( select study_key
   25         ,      phase_start_date
   26         ,      measurement_date_taken
   27         ,      study_end_date
   28         ,      add_up
   29         from (
   30                select study_key
   31                ,      phase_start_date
   32                ,      measurement_date_taken
   33                ,      study_end_date
   34                ,      study_end_date - max(measurement_date_taken) over (partition by study_key
   35                                                                          order by measurement_date_taken ) add_up
   36                ,      lead(measurement_date_taken) over (partition by study_key
   37                                                          order by measurement_date_taken ) last_rec
   38                from   t
   39              )
   40         where last_rec is null
   41       )
   42  where rownum <= add_up
   43  connect by level <= add_up;
  
   STUDY_KEY PHASE_START_DATE    MEASUREMENT_DATE_TA STUDY_END_DATE
  ---------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
        1063 01-03-2009 00:00:00 02-03-2009 00:00:00 01-04-2009 00:00:00
        1063 03-03-2009 00:00:00 04-03-2009 00:00:00 01-04-2009 00:00:00
        1063 03-03-2009 00:00:00 09-03-2009 00:00:00 01-04-2009 00:00:00
        1063 03-03-2009 00:00:00 14-03-2009 00:00:00 01-04-2009 00:00:00
        1063 03-03-2009 00:00:00 19-03-2009 00:00:00 01-04-2009 00:00:00
        1063 22-03-2009 00:00:00 23-03-2009 00:00:00 01-04-2009 00:00:00
        1063 22-03-2009 00:00:00 30-03-2009 00:00:00 01-04-2009 00:00:00
        1063 22-03-2009 00:00:00 31-03-2009 00:00:00 01-04-2009 00:00:00
        1063 22-03-2009 00:00:00 01-04-2009 00:00:00 01-04-2009 00:00:00
  
  9 rijen zijn geselecteerd.
  

  Is there a simpler way (in SQL), I hope that others join, and share their ideas/example/thoughts.
  I feel that it is using more resources there.
  But I have to cut the daisies before now, they interfere my 'grass-green-ess";)

• COMPARING TWO ROWS IN THE SAME TABLE AND DELETE THEM USING DELETION BLOCK

  Hi all
  I have a problem. I have an Employee table
  
  employee
  
  Emp_name Emp_id Emp_status Emp_date
  
  John 1 P 11-27-2010
  
  Mike 2 26/11/2010 S
  
  Simon P 3 22 / 11 / 2010
  
  Dennis C 4 25/11/2010...
  
  
  I compare the rows in the table and their employee_status if 'P', should I remove the... Here, I should delete lines 1 and 3 as their Emp_status is 'P '. I only use BULK DELETE... I tried to use the join query internal and deletion, but it does not work... Can someone help me...

  Ooops, it should be:

  and e2.emp_status in ('P', 'C')

  not

  and e2.emp_status in ('P', 'A')

  Here it goes:

  SQL> select  *
    2    from  employees
    3  /
  
  E EMP_NAME      EMP_KEY          X
  - ---------- ---------- ----------
  C John              123          1
  P Mike              123          2
  P Paul              123          6
  C Harry             124          5
  A Gass              125          7
  C Gass              125          7
  
  6 rows selected.
  
  delete  employees e1
    where 2 = (
               select  count(distinct e2.emp_status)
                    from  employees e2
                    where e2.emp_key = e1.emp_key
                      and e2.emp_status in ('P','C')
                 )
  /
  
  3 rows deleted.
  
  SQL>
  

  SY.

• Sign up between 2 tables without correspondence with values and keep the number of rows in the first Table

  Hello Experts,

  I have a problem that is a little tricky. Requirement is if 2 columns (region and Code in the tables below) match exactly, then it is Best Fit, if one of the columns match while it is average in shape, if the two columns do not match then it's worse to adapt.

  Create Table Table1 (varchar2 (10), varchar2 (10) of the filter region, Code varchar2 (10), revenue Number (15), owner varchar2 (5));

  Table1:

  Insert into Table1 values ('Test1', 'Midwest', '0900', 3000286, 'P1')

  Insert into Table1 values ('Test1', 'Midwest', '0899', 36472323, 'P2')

  Insert into Table1 values ('Test1', 'Midwest', '0898', 22472742, "P3")

  Insert into Table1 values ('Test1', 'West', '0901', 375237423, 'P1')

  Insert into Table1 values ('Test1', 'West', '0700', 34737523, null)

  Insert into Table1 values ('Test1', 'West', '0701', 95862077, "P3")

  Insert into Table1 values ('Test1', 'South', '0703', 73438953, 'P4')

  Insert into Table1 values ('Test1', 'South', '0704', 87332089, 'P1')

  Insert into Table1 values ('Test1', 'South', '0705', 98735162, 'P4')

  Insert into Table1 values ('Test1', 'South', '0706', 173894762, "P9")

  Insert into Table1 values ('Test1', 'South', '0902', 72642511, 'P6')

  Create Table Table2 (filter varchar2 (10), region varchar2 (10), Code varchar2 (10), plafond1 Number (15), Limit2 Number (15));

  Table2

  Insert into Table2 Values ('Test1', 'ALL', ' 0902', 15000, 10000)

  Insert into Table2 Values ('Test1', 'ALL', 'ALL', 20000, 12000)

  Insert into Table2 Values ('Test1', 'Midwest' ' 0900', 10000, 5000)

  Insert into Table2 Values ('Test1', 'Midwest', 'ALL', 18000, 8000)

  Insert into Table2 Values ('Test1', 'West', 'ALL', 16000, 6000)

  Insert into Table2 Values ('Test1', 'West', '0901', 10000, 5000)

  Final output

  Filter the income Code region owner plafond1 Limit2

  Test1 0900 3000286 P1 10 000 5 000 - Best Midwest (region because both Code Matches)

  Test1 0899 36472323 P2 Midwest 18 000 8 000 - way (because the region corresponds to only), we consider 'ALL' for the Code

  Test1 0898 22472742 P3 Midwest 18 000 8 000 - way (because the region corresponds to only), we consider 'ALL' for the Code

  Test1 West 0901 375237423 10 000 5 000 - Best P1 (region because both Code Matches)

  Test1 West 0700 34737523 16 000 6 000 - medium (because the area corresponds to only), we consider 'ALL' for the Code

  Test1 West 0701 95862077 P3 16 000 6 000 - way (because the region corresponds to only), we consider 'ALL' for the Code

  Test1 South 0703 73438953 P4 20 000 12 000 - worse (because region both Code DON T Match ' "), we consider option as worst 'ALL', 'ALL '.

  Test1 South 0704 87332089 P1 20 000 12 000 - worse (because region both Code DON T Match ' "), we consider option as worst 'ALL', 'ALL '.

  Test1 South 0705 98735162 P4 20 000 12 000 - worse (because region both Code DON T Match ' "), we consider option as worst 'ALL', 'ALL '.

  Test1 South 0706 173894762 P9 20 000 12 000 - worse (because region both Code DON T Match ' "), we consider option as worst 'ALL', 'ALL '.

  Test1 South 0902 72642511 P6 15 000 10 000 - way (because the Code corresponds to only) we consider 'ALL' for the region

  In the final result, we should have row count equal to Table1, and as soon as there's game (best first, then middle, then the worst), then if is once again, that we should ignore.

  There are other columns in the tables as well.

  Thank you very much!

  As you wish...

  select filter, region, code, region2, code2,
  revenue, owner, limit1, limit2, match
  from (
    select filter, region, code, region2, code2,
    revenue, owner, limit1, limit2, match,
    row_number() over(
      partition by filter, region, code order by match
    ) priority
    from (
      select a.filter, a.region, a.code, a.revenue, a.owner,
      b.region region2, b.code code2, b.limit1, b.limit2,
      case
        when (a.region, a.code) = ((b.region, b.code)) then 'Best'
        when a.region = b.region or a.code = b.code then 'Medium'
        else 'Worst'
      end match
      from table1 a
      join table2 b
      on a.filter = b.filter
      and (b.region, b.code) in (
        (a.region, a.code),
        (a.region, 'ALL'),
        ('ALL', a.code),
        ('ALL', 'ALL')
      )
    )
  )
  where priority = 1
  order by region, code;