#NOACCESS

Hi guys,.

While trying to post a journal (11.1.1.3 version), I realized that I can't access a cell (received the message of #noaccess to SV). It's weird, because I have security rights (granted by being in a group) for classes of accounting and security principals.
I'm not quite sure how to solve this problem. I think I'm missing something, but not very well what.

Hope you can help me.

Thank you!

You can consult in order to "make adjustments" has been defined for the entity. Also the period opened for journals. Also the management of this process has been started (if you use it).

Tags: Business Intelligence

Similar Questions

  • Role of ESXi 4.1 ROOT have accidentally changed NoAccess. Help!

    Hello world.

    We have an ESXi 4.1 server. One of our administrator accidentally changed the role of the user root of vSphare NoAccess.
    The big question is to know how to restore the role of the root user, because there is no other way to control our server.
    (Of course we have if necessary physical controll, so we could do something with the consol)

    It is possibble sort to recover the root user or need to reinstall the server?
    (DCUI have the Administrator role...)

    Thanks in advance.

    Found and tested solution:

    We applied the menu item reset the configuration of the system , that re added all the VM-s.

    It has solved all of our problems in 10 minutes.

    Thanks for all tips.

  • HFM: NoAccess while process is submitted

    We noticed that we are not able to see the data in HFM (reception NoAccess) when process is submitted unless the user has the role of the issuer or the role of supervisor for review. Is this correct? Or is there another setting that we are missing?

    Any input is greatly appreciated.

    Thank you!

    I may be misinterpreting your response, but I think you misunderstand what "submitter" actually means. If the user must load data, they must have a review role. In other words, at least 1 the examiner. "Author" is a term that means that the data has been submitted for final exam before becoming published. It has no connection with the Act of sending data (loading).

    -Chris

  • NoAccess error

    I have trouble editing recorded for FMS3-Flash stream. From time to time, the NetStream will publish a FLV, but most of the time, successfully it fails due to an error of NoAccess. I have two instances of my SWF publish two video netstreams, each to send live video to the other SWF and one to record the video at SGF. Publication names are only created whenever I run the SWF and there are no subscribers to the netstream registered, but I still get the error.

    The code is derived from the class that I use for video streaming, and according to which instance of the SWF file, it publishes / subscribes to the other SWF.

    Hope someone can give me a clue as to why this error occurs.

    I got around the NoAccess error somehow saying the netstream 'Add' instead of 'record', but now I can't play my flv files. I have other ones in a different directory and these play very well, and even when I move the FLV stored in the directory, that they still won't play. But an another flv I recorded earlier plays in the first directory.

    Flash is so unpredictable sometimes, it makes me crazy.

  • NOACCESS to data from a network of HFM

    Hello

    I am not able to see the data for a particular in HFM POV when I assigned the default role and default security for this user class. So do I need assign a different role to display data of HFM?

    It's URGENT

    Hello

    Assuming that you have enabled the management of the process, you will need to start the period and move in the level of the exam, that usage has access. For more information, see Chapter 12, page 224, hfm_user.pdf.

    If you can not do... just disable processmanagement...

    Kind regards

    Thanos

  • The user .js: capability.policy is gone for good?

    user_pref ("capability.policy.policynames", "nojsbroken");
    user_pref ("capability.policy.nojsbroken.javascript.enabled", "noAccess");
    United Steelworkers

    Seems to have stopped working with Firefox 29. He's coming back, or is he gone for good?

    He went. You can use the modules as YesScript (black list) or NoScript (white list).

  • Analysis sax XML parser

    Hello...

    I would like to publish this example to help pasring xml or live feed from a URL.

    SAXParserFactory plant = SAXParserFactory.newInstance ();
    SAXParser saxParser = factory.newSAXParser ();

    DefaultHandler Manager = new DefaultHandler() {}

    ' public void startElement (String uri, String localName, String qName,
    Attributes attributes) throws SAXException {}
    If (qName.equalsIgnoreCase ("an element of xml"))
    {

    vector.addElement (attributes.getValue ("attribute of an element"));

    }

    ElseIf (qName.equalsIgnoreCase ("second item FRO xml"))
    {

    attributteValue = attributes.getValue ("title");

    }

    ' public void endElement (String uri, String localName, String qName)
    throws SAXException {}

    currentElement = false;

    If (qName.equalsIgnoreCase ("end of the element"))
    {
    do something
    }

    }

    };
    S StreamConnection = null;

    s = (StreamConnection) Connector.open ("enter the url that provides the xml file");
    HttpConnection httpConn s = (HttpConnection);

    If (httpConn.getResponseCode () is 400)

    {
    Dialog.Alert ("internett noaccess");

    }

    InputStream input = null;
    entry = s.openInputStream ();

    Reader reader = new InputStreamReader(input,"UTF-8");
    InputSource is = new InputSource (reader);
    is.setEncoding("UTF-8");

    saxParser.parse (, Manager);
    }

    Add the required elements of the XML in the analysis to the vectors and do something.

    SAX (Simple API for XML) is a parser based on the events in sequential access API developed by the XML - DEV list for XML documents. SAX provides a mechanism for reading data from an XML document that is an alternative to that provided by the DOM (Document Object). When the DOM works on the document as a whole, SAX parsers function on each element of the XML document in order.

    SAX parsers have certain advantages over DOM-style parsers. A SAX parser doesn't need to declare every event analysis what happens and almost all of these once-reported information normally rejects (he does, however, keep some things, for example a list of all the elements that have not been closed yet, in order to intercept errors later as the end tags in the wrong order). Thus, the minimum memory required for a SAX parser is proportional to the maximum depth of the XML (i.e. the XML tree) and the maximum data involved in a single XML event (for example, the name and the attributes of a single tag start, or the content of a processing instruction, etc.).

    This amount of memory is generally regarded as negligible. A DOM parser, however, usually built a representation of the tree of the entire document in memory at first, using memory that increases with the length of the entire document. It takes a lot of time and space for large documents (memory allocation and the construction of data structures take time). The advantage of compensation, of course, is that once loaded no matter what part of the document are accessible in any order.

    I hope this post was helpful.



    Welcome on the support forums.

    Thank you for contributing. There is however a minor problem: all blocking operations must be made on a separate thread. You cannot use Dialog.alert on a thread without use invokelater or synchronization on the eventlock, you should fix that.

    In addition, there are a lot of response codes, and you should check for 200 continue, otherwise trigger an error.

    There is also a xmldemo in the samples provided with the eclipse plugin or JDE, but it uses DocumentBuilder, no Sax.

  • LDAP on SAA with the attribute-map

    Hi all

    I have problems to set up authentication of VPN clients on a LDAP server.  The main problem is when the ASA needs to decide a strategy group for users of the non-compliance.

    I use the LDAP attribute cards in the SAA to map the parameter memberOf attribute group Cisco-policy, can I associate the ad group that the user must belong to a VPN and rigth memberOf Group Policy access.  This method works correctly.

    But the problem is when the remote user is not in the correct group AD, I put a group by default-policy - do not have access to this type of users.  After that, all users (authorized and unauthorized) fall into the same default - group policy do not have VPN access.

    There are the ASA configuration:

    LDAP LDAP attribute-map
    name of the memberOf Group Policy map
    map-value memberOf "cn = ASA_VPN, ou = ASA_VPN, OU = my group, dc = xxx, dc is com" RemoteAccess

    AAA-Server LDAP protocol ldap
    AAA-Server LDAP (inside) host 10.0.0.3
    or base LDAP-dn = "My group", dc = xxx, dc is com
    LDAP-scope subtree
    LDAP-naming-attribute sAMAccountName
    LDAP-login-password *.
    LDAP-connection-dn cn = users, ou = "My group", dc = xxx, dc = com
    microsoft server type
    LDAP-attribute-map LDAP

    internal group NOACCESS strategy
    NOACCESS group policy attributes
    VPN - concurrent connections 0

    internal RemoteAccess group strategy
    Group Policy attributes RemoteAccess
    value of server DNS 10.0.0.3
    Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec
    field default value xxx.com

    tunnel-group RemoteAccess type remote access
    attributes global-tunnel-group RemoteAccess
    address-pool
    LDAP authentication group-server
    NOACCESS by default-group-policy
    tunnel-group ipsec-attributes RemoteAccess
    pre-shared key *.

    As you can see, I followed all of the examples available on the web site to solve the problem, but I can't get a good result.

    Does anyone have a solution for this problem?

    Kind regards

    Guzmán

    Guzman,

    It should work without a doubt, that is the part to refuse already works well and the user who has the correct memberOf attribute should certainly are mapped to Allow access policy and should therefore be allowed in.

    I think that's a bug as well, but I had a quick glance and see nothing correspondent, and if it was a bug in 8.2.3. so I'm not expecting you to be the first customer to discover this, so I'm still more inclined to think that it's something in the config that we neglect (I know frome experience typo can sometimes be very difficult to spot).

    Could you get "debug aaa 255 Commons", so please, maybe that will tell us something.

    BTW, just to be sure: you don't don't have anything (such as vpn - connections) configured in the DfltGrpPolicy, did you? Just double check since your access policy Allow would inherit that.

    Maybe another test, explicitly configure a nonzero value for this parameter in the policy allow access, i.e.

    Group Policy allow access attrib

    VPN - 10 concurrent connections

    Herbert

  • Access to the LDAP VPN ASA group

    Hello, I have configured the access remote vpn on asa with ldap authentication. But I can't limit access vpn with specific ldap group.

    Here is my config:

    AAA-server AZPBTDC01 (DC_Internal) host 192.168.10.250
    LDAP-base-dn dc = company, dc = com
    LDAP-scope subtree
    LDAP-naming-attribute sAMAccountName
    LDAP-login-password *.
    LDAP-connection-dn cn = Netuser, OU = Services users, or is ASM HQ, dc is company, dc = com
    microsoft server type
    LDAP-attribute-map AZPBTDC01

    LDAP attribute-map AZPBTDC01
    name of the memberOf Group Policy map
    map-value memberOf "CN = VPN_Admin, OU = ASM group, OU = ASM HQ, DC = company, DC = com" RA_ADMIN_GP

    internal group NOACCESS strategy
    NOACCESS group policy attributes
    VPN - concurrent connections 0
    client ssl-VPN-tunnel-Protocol ikev1
    address pools no

    internal RA_ADMIN_GP group policy
    RA_ADMIN_GP group policy attributes
    value of server DNS 192.168.10.251
    VPN - connections 3
    Ikev1 VPN-tunnel-Protocol
    Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
    value of Split-tunnel-network-list IPSEC_RA_ACL_ADMIN

    attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup
    NOACCESS by default-group-policy

    type tunnel-group IPSEC_RA_ADMIN remote access
    attributes global-tunnel-group IPSEC_RA_ADMIN
    authentication-server-group LOCAL AZPBTDC01
    authorization-server-group AZPBTDC01
    Group Policy - by default-RA_ADMIN_GP

    The problem is all the domen users can connect to the vpn. ASA does not ranking filter in a group, no VPN_Admin group users can connect, but the man should not be able to connect.

    If it is possible to make this approach work, I wouldn't do it this way.  Use rather DAP (Dynamic Access Policy).

    The instructions for this are here:

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-next-generation-firewalls/108000-DAP-Deploy-Guide.html

    Search for "Active Directory group" to jump directly to the corresponding section.  Note that you may need two policies DAP.  One to match users living in VPN_Admin and another default policy to deny access to everyone.

    Note for the default "opt-out" policy, that I often make it pop up a message to the end user, saying that they do not have VPN access and contact xxx if they want to fix it.

  • Unable to connect to the ASA vpn Android client

    secHello, I have problem with android client. So I've solved many problems and finally could get the PHASE 1 and PHASE 1 COMPLETED messages in newspapers :). In any case, I have a problem different, even if the client of the phase 1 and 2 completed failed to connect again. Here are the logs:

    | 21456 | *** | 500 | Built of UDP connection entrants for outdoor 600577524: * / 21456 (* / 21456) identity: * / 500 (* / 500)
    | 27262 | *** | 4500 | Built of UDP connection entrants for outdoor 600577567: * / 27262 (* / 27262) identity: * / 4500 (* / 4500)
    Group = ANDROID_PROF, IP = *, automatic NAT detection status: remote endpoint IS behind a NAT device this end is behind a NAT device
    Group = ANDROID_PROF, IP = *, floating NAT - T of * port 21456 to * port 27262
    Group = ANDROID_PROF, IP = *, PHASE 1 COMPLETED
    Group = ANDROID_PROF, IP = *, IPSec initiator of the substitution of regeneration of the key time of 0 to 4608000 Kbs
    IPSEC: Remote access out HIS (SPI = 0x0429CEA7) between * and * (user = ANDROID_PROF) was created.
    Group = ANDROID_PROF, IP = *, the security negotiation is complete for user (Responder), Inbound SPI = 0xc95803fc outbound SPI = 0x0429cea7
    IPSEC: Incoming remote access between HIS (SPI = 0xC95803FC) * and * (user = ANDROID_PROF) was created.
    Group = ANDROID_PROF, IP = *, PHASE 2 COMPLETED (msgid = 9aab13ed)
    | 27262 | *** | 1701 | Built of UDP connection entrants for outdoor 600577657: * / 27262 (* / 27262) identity: * / 1701 (* / 1701)
    L2TP tunnel created, tunnel_id 24, remote_peer_ip is *, 1/ppp_virtual_interface_id, client_dynamic_ip is 0.0.0.0, user name is *.
    Tunnel L2TP deleted, tunnel_id = 24, remote_peer_ip = *.
    IPSEC: Remote access out HIS (SPI = 0x0429CEA7) between * and * (user = ANDROID_PROF) has been removed.
    IPSEC: Incoming remote access between HIS (SPI = 0xC95803FC) * and * (user = ANDROID_PROF) has been removed.
    Group = ANDROID_PROF, IP = *, Session is to be demolished. Reason: The user has requested
    Group = ANDROID_PROF, user name =, IP = *, disconnected Session. Session type: IPsecOverNatT, duration: 0 h: 00 m: 07 s, xmt bytes: 1021, RRs bytes: 955, reason: the user has requested

    As you can see session was demolished immediately, said Android failure. The Android settings:
    Name: ANDROID_PROF

    Type: L2TP/IPsec Psk

    The IPsec identifier: ANDROID_PROF

    Pre-shared key IPsec: cisco

    The ASA config:

    attributes global-tunnel-group ANDROID_PROF
    address IPSEC_RA_POOL pool
    Group-LDAP LOCAL authentication server
    LDAP authorization-server-group
    NOACCESS by default-group-policy
    IPSec-attributes tunnel-group ANDROID_PROF
    IKEv1 pre-shared-key *.
    tunnel-group ANDROID_PROF ppp-attributes
    CHAP Authentication
    ms-chap-v2 authentication

    ANDROID_PROF_GP group policy attributes
    value of DNS server *.
    VPN - 4 concurrent connections
    Protocol-tunnel-VPN l2tp ipsec
    Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
    value of Split-tunnel-network-list ANDROID_PROF_USERS
    Cisco.local value by default-field
    the address value IPSEC_RA_POOL pools

    Hello

    Your problem is with Android L2TP/IPsec client that connects to the AAS has been caused by: CSCug60492 (Android phone disconnected from l2tpoveripsec and reconnect asa hung)

    It is Android actually issue, not a bug of the SAA. This resolution is based on Android.

    I hope this helps.

    Thank you

    Vishnu

  • ASA 9.0.2 - LDAP, MS AD, ldap-base-dn CN problem

    Hello

    I configured the LDAP on ASA authentication for VPN users. In MS AD, I have a group called 'VPN_Users' but this is CN.

    LDAP-base-dn CN = VPN_Users, OR = users, DC = company, DC = local

    The path identified in AD shows:

    DN: CN = VPN_Users, OR = users, DC = company, DC = local

    I want to allow only the users who are in the group mentioned. But it does not work. It seems that '' CN = VPN_Users '' is not one recognized as a group but it is.

    Any idea? or experience? Its IOS bug or what.

    Thank you.

    HI Matus,

    This is what you need.

    Configuration to limit access to a particular group of windows on AD

    LDAP LDAP of attribute-map-MAP

    name of the memberOf IETF-Radius-class card

    map-value memberOf CN = VPN_Users, OR = users, DC = company, DC = local

    !

    ! --- Name of group policy should be the group policy that you have configured on ASA-

    !

    AAA-Server LDAP-AD ldap Protocol

    AAA-Server LDAP-AD

    Server-port 389

    LDAP-base-dn DC = company, DC = local

    LDAP-scope subtree

    LDAP-naming-attribute sAMAccountName

    LDAP-connection-dn

    LDAP-login-password

    microsoft server type

    LDAP-attribute-map LDAP-map

    !

    !

    Group Policy internal

    attributes of group policy

    VPN - connections 3

    Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec...

    value of address pools

    !

    !

    internal group noaccess strategy

    attributes of the strategy group noaccess

    VPN - connections 1

    address pools no

    !

    !

    type of tunnel-group-remote access

    global-tunnel-group attributes

    Group-AD-LDAP authentication server

    NoAccess by default-group-policy

    Just in case, it does not work for you. Get the following information:

    Turn on the 'debugging ldap 255' group on the SAA and to connect with a user account that belongs to the Users of VPN

    1.] show run ldap

    2.] show aaa Server

    3.] see the tunnel-group race

    4.] show run Group Policy

    OR

    You can provide SH RUN of the SAA.

    Jatin kone
    -Does the rate of useful messages

  • ASA 5520 - VPN using LDAP access control

    I'm setting up an ASA 5520 for VPN access.  Authorization & authentication using an LDAP server.  I have successfully configured tunnel, and I can access internal resources.  What I want to do now is to limit access to a specific ad group membership.  In the absence of this belonging to a group, a user cannot access the VPN.

    My VPN client software testing is Cisco Systems VPN Client 5.0.05.0290 Version.  The Group authentication is configured in a connection entry that identifies the Group of Tunnel. I think I wrote that correctly.

    The Version of the software on the SAA is 8.3 (1).

    My current challenge is getting the VPN to stop letting each request for access through little matter belonging to a group.  I found the thread below to be significantly useful, but there is obviously something which is not entirely mesh with my situation.

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/3232649#3232649

    Thanking all in advance for everything offered thoughts and advice.

    Configuration (AAA LDAP, group policy and group of tunnel) is below.

    AAA-Server LDAP protocol ldap
    AAA-Server LDAP (inside) host x.x.y.12
    Server-port 636
    LDAP-base-dn dc = domain, dc = com
    LDAP-scope subtree
    LDAP-naming-attribute sAMAccountName
    LDAP-login-password *.
    LDAP-connection-dn cn = svcacct, or = svcac, or = users, or = svcad, dc = domain, dc = com
    enable LDAP over ssl
    microsoft server type
    LDAP-attribute-map LDAP_MAP
    AAA-Server LDAP (inside) host x.x.y.10
    Server-port 636
    LDAP-base-dn dc = domain, dc = com
    LDAP-scope subtree
    LDAP-naming-attribute sAMAccountName
    LDAP-login-password *.
    LDAP-connection-dn cn = svcacct, or = svcac, or = users, or = svcad, dc = domain, dc = com
    enable LDAP over ssl
    LDAP-attribute-map LDAP_MAP
    AAA-Server LDAP (inside) host x.x.y.11
    Server-port 636
    LDAP-base-dn dc = domain, dc = com
    LDAP-scope subtree
    LDAP-naming-attribute sAMAccountName
    LDAP-login-password *.
    LDAP-connection-dn cn = svcacct, or = svcac, or = users, or = svcad, dc = domain, dc = com
    enable LDAP over ssl
    microsoft server type
    LDAP-attribute-map LDAP_MAP

    AAA-Server LDAP (inside) host x.x.y.10
    Server-port 636
    LDAP-base-dn dc = domain, dc = com
    LDAP-scope subtree
    LDAP-naming-attribute sAMAccountName
    LDAP-login-password *.
    LDAP-connection-dn cn = svcacct, or = svcac, or = users, or = svcad, dc = domain, dc = com
    enable LDAP over ssl
    LDAP-attribute-map LDAP_MAP
    AAA-Server LDAP (inside) host x.x.y.11
    Server-port 636
    LDAP-base-dn dc = domain, dc = com
    LDAP-scope subtree
    LDAP-naming-attribute sAMAccountName
    LDAP-login-password *.
    LDAP-connection-dn cn = svcacct, or = svcac, or = users, or = svcad, dc = domain, dc = com
    enable LDAP over ssl
    microsoft server type
    LDAP-attribute-map LDAP_MAP
    !
    internal group NOACCESS strategy
    NOACCESS group policy attributes
    VPN - concurrent connections 0
    Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec webvpn
    address pools no
    attributes of Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy
    VPN - 10 concurrent connections
    Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec webvpn
    enable IPSec-udp
    vpn group policy - pro internal
    vpn - pro group policy attributes
    value x.x.y.17 x.x.y.27 WINS server
    Server DNS value x.x.y.19 x.x.y.29
    VPN - 50 simultaneous connections
    Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec svc
    group-lock value vpn - pro
    field default value domain.com
    value of address ip-vpn-pro pools
    WebVPN
    client of dpd-interval SVC no
    dpd-interval SVC 1800 bridge
    !

    attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup
    LDAP authentication group-server
    LDAP authorization-server-group
    Group Policy - by default-vpn-pro
    authorization required
    type group tunnel vpn - pro remote access
    attributes global-tunnel-group-vpn - pro
    LDAP authentication group-server
    Group-server-authentication (LDAP outside)
    LDAP authorization-server-group
    Group Policy - by default-vpn-pro
    band-Kingdom
    password-management
    band-band
    authorization required
    type tunnel-group NOACCESSGROUP remote access
    attributes global-tunnel-group NOACCESSGROUP
    LDAP authentication group-server
    NOACCESS by default-group-policy

    Hello

    The configuration of what you are looking for is a feature called DAP (Dynamic Access Policy)

    The following link will explain how to set up the same.

    http://www.ciscosystems.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_white_paper09186a00809fcf38.shtml

    I hope this helps.

    Kind regards

    Anisha

    P.S.: Please mark this thread as answered if you feel that your query is resolved. Note the useful messages.

  • CIsco Anyconnect VPN with LDAP AAA

    Hi there, I was hoping that someone can point me in the right direction here. I created a VPN connection profile to match anyconnect SSL entering customers. I would like to use LDAP group membership as a sine qua non for authentication. I found a few online pages on what to do about it, I followed. Unfortunately, it seems my connection profile to allow access to any user in the ldap, not only those of the ldap group database. I'll post the relevant bits of the config here in hopes that someone can point my mistake!

    The idea of the config is to have the map of connections 2 by default a noaccess policy which has 0 simultaneous connections and the profile card (SSL_VPN) connection ssl to anyconnect to group_policy_SSL_VPN group policy.

    local pool CONTOSOVICVPN_DHCP_POOL 10.0.5.51 - 10.0.5.254 255.255.255.0 IP mask

    NAT (inside_int, any) static source NetworkGroup_Internal_networks NetworkGroup_Internal_networks Network_VPNRANGE_10.0.5.0 Network_VPNRANGE_10.0.5.0 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

    LDAP attribute-map AuthUsers
    name of the memberOf Group Policy map
    map-value memberOf memberOf CN = NETWORK_CONTOSO_ASA_VPN_DLSG, OR = network, OU = resources, OU = CONTOSO, OU = security, OU = Groups, DC = CONTOSO, DC = group

    ynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy

    AAA-server CONTOSOVIC_LDAP protocol ldap
    AAA-server CONTOSOVIC_LDAP (inside_int) 10.0.0.45
    LDAP-base-dn DC = CONTOSO, DC = group
    LDAP-group-base-dn DC = CONTOSO, DC = group
    LDAP-scope subtree
    LDAP-naming-attribute sAMAccountName
    LDAP-login-password *.
    LDAP-connection-dn CN = ASA_LDAP_USER, OU = network, OU = accounts, DC = CONTOSO, DC = group
    microsoft server type

    No vpn-addr-assign aaa
    No dhcp vpn-addr-assign

    SSL-trust ASDM_TrustPoint4 outside_int point
    WebVPN
    Select outside_int
    AnyConnect essentials
    AnyConnect image disk0:/anyconnect-win-2.4.1012-k9.pkg 1
    AnyConnect enable
    tunnel-group-list activate
    internal NoAccess group strategy
    Group Policy attributes NoAccess
    WINS server no
    VPN - concurrent connections 0
    Ikev1 VPN-tunnel-Protocol, l2tp ipsec ikev2 ssl-client
    value by default-field CONTOSO.group
    disable the split-tunnel-all dns
    attributes of Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy
    VPN - concurrent connections 0
    client ssl-VPN-tunnel-Protocol ikev1 l2tp ipsec
    internal GroupPolicy_SSL_VPN group strategy
    attributes of Group Policy GroupPolicy_SSL_VPN
    WINS server no
    value of server DNS 10.0.0.45
    VPN - connections 1
    Ikev1 VPN-tunnel-Protocol, l2tp ipsec ikev2 ssl-client
    value of group-lock SSL_VPN
    Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
    value of Split-tunnel-network-list VPN_SPLIT_TUNNEL
    value by default-field CONTOSO.group
    activate dns split-tunnel-all
    the address value CONTOSOVICVPN_DHCP_POOL pools

    attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup
    authorization-server-group CONTOSOVIC_LDAP
    NoAccess by default-group-policy
    authorization required
    tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup webvpn-attributes
    message of rejection-RADIUS-
    attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultWEBVPNGroup
    NoAccess by default-group-policy
    type tunnel-group SSL_VPN remote access
    attributes global-tunnel-group SSL_VPN
    address CONTOSOVICVPN_DHCP_POOL pool
    authentication-server-group CONTOSOVIC_LDAP
    authorization-server-group CONTOSOVIC_LDAP
    Group Policy - by default-GroupPolicy_SSL_VPN
    authorization required
    tunnel-group SSL_VPN webvpn-attributes
    message of rejection-RADIUS-
    Proxy-auth sdi
    enable CONTOSOvicvpn.CONTOSOgroup.com.au group-alias

    You must specify the NoAccess group policy as group policy by default for the Group of the SSL_VPN tunnel.

    Remember to rate helpful answers. :)

  • AnyConnect: User based authentication certificate filtering Configuration

    Hello colleagues in the network.

    recently I needed to configure AnyConnect SSL VPN with certificate authentication to meet the needs of connection at the request of the features of Cisco Jabber.

    Everything is ok, but I need to filter users based on their personal certificate information. For example - all those who have a personal certificate from our CA can now access this VPN. I want to set the users by e-mail of the certificate and only these users are granted access.

    I used this command:

    WebVPN

    allow outside

    AnyConnect image disk0:/anyconnect-win-3.1.04072-k9.pkg 1

    AnyConnect enable

    tunnel-group-list activate

    Certificate-Group-map Cert - filter 10 company-Jabber

    map of encryption ca Cert certificate - filter 10

    name of the object attr eq ea [email protected] / * /

    The problem is that I have to go can visit his profile - if I change [email protected] / * / to

    On the AnyConnect client - I connect to the GroupURL of the connection profile Company-Jabber

    Hi Alexandre

    There are several ways to approach this and this depends somewhat on the rest of the config, for example if you have other groups of tunnel etc..

    I guess the easiest way (if it does not interfere with the rest of your configuration) is to add something like this:

    crypto ca certificate map Cert-Filter 65535 subject-name ne ""

    This would attract all users/certificates does not not from your previous rules.

    Under webvpn you map these users to another tunnel-group (connection profile):

    certificate-group-map Cert-Filter 65535 NoAccess

    And configure the NoAccess group so that access is denied (for example, by setting simultaneous connections to 0 in the corresponding Group Policy).

    Other means would be to use DAP (dynamic access policies) to pretty much the same as the certmap, or permission to LDAP (for example retrieves the user name for the certificate, then perform an LDAP search to see if the user is allowed to use the VPN - in this scenario, there is no need to list all the users on the ASA but for example you need to create a new group on your LDAP server that contains all VPN users).

    Let me know if you want to go further in the foregoing

    see you soon

    Herbert

  • LDAP authentication problems

    Hello

    I am able to get the LDAP authentication works for the VPN, but when I go to test a user that is not defined in the VPN group in the ad, they are still able to authenticate and access to the VPN. I'm at a loss for what is the real problem, because everything seems to be set correctly.

    I joined newspapers in debugging ldap for a user that works properly and that a user that does not work properly. I think that they should be able to authenticate to a group JOB_ADMINS_VPN and if they are not in this group then they should be denied rights of VPN connection.

    LDAP attribute-map JOB_ADMIN_MAP

    name of the memberOf Group Policy map

    map-value memberOf CN = JOB_ADMINS_VPN, OU = VPN, DC = test, dc = net JOB_ADMINS

    AAA-server JOB_ADMINS protocol ldap

    AAA-server JOB_ADMINS (Prod) 10.5.1.11

    LDAP-base-dn DC = test, DC = net

    OR LDAP-group-base dn = VPN, DC = test, DC = net

    LDAP-scope subtree

    LDAP-naming-attribute sAMAccountName

    LDAP-login-password *.

    LDAP-connection-dn CN = saVPNLDAP, CN = Users, DC = test, DC = net

    microsoft server type

    LDAP-attribute-map JOB_ADMIN_MAP

    I don't know miss me something small, but I don't know what I'm missing. Any contributions to this number will be grately apperciated.

    Thank you!

    Please review the below listed config and see what hand you lack of other "sh run" of the SAA.

    Configuration to limit access to a particular group of windows on AD

    internal group noaccess strategy

    attributes of the strategy group noaccess

    VPN - connections 1

    address pools no

    LDAP LDAP of attribute-map-MAP

    name of the memberOf IETF-Radius-class card

    map-value memberOf

    AAA-Server LDAP-AD ldap Protocol

    AAA-Server LDAP-AD

    Server-port 389

    LDAP-base-dn

    LDAP-scope subtree

    LDAP-naming-attribute sAMAccountName

    LDAP-connection-dn

    LDAP-login-password

    microsoft server type

    LDAP-attribute-map LDAP-map

    Group Policy internal

    attributes of group policy

    VPN - connections 3

    Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec...

    value of address pools

    .....

    .....

    type of tunnel-group-remote access

    global-tunnel-group attributes

    Group-AD-LDAP authentication server

    NoAccess by default-group-policy

    !

    !

    attributes of the strategy group noaccess

    VPN - concurrent connections 0

    Jatin kone

    -Does the rate of useful messages-

Maybe you are looking for