Refresh is beta compatible with VS2010 SP1?

Similar Questions

• LV2010 is compatible with LV2010 SP1?

  So if I save a file in LV2010 SP1... can it be opened in LV2010?

  Thank you!

  Yes.

• I want to buy a better graphics card for games - what graphics cards are compatible with my pc

  I need help on graphics cards is compatible with the motherboard in my PC...

  I need a better graphics card, one for games with 2 GB of video ram. Need help choosing a graphics card on my PC.

  PC name: Pavilion Slimeline s5730y

  Hello

  Yes. and Yes.

  The issue of power supply is theoretical, as, once again, is not necessary to insert a graphics card on the system board.

  You have zero options to upgrade graphics card.

  Jay

• My Vista SP1 is not compatible with my Family Tree Maker version 16. __

  I have the program windows Vista SP1 and my Family Tree Maker version 16 is not compatible with it. What should I do so that I can use this program on this Vista computer? Thank you

  Hi tondsmith,

  Family Tree Maker is compatible with Windows XP? (You don't actually say if it worked on Vista but is no longer works since installing SP1). If this worked on XP and then try to install in compatibility mode.

  1 / locate the "setup" for Family Tree Maker file and right-click on it.

  2 / in the drop-down menu, click Properties.

  3 / in the Properties window, click the Compatibility tab.

  4 / in the compatibility window you will see a section (top) marked 'compatibility mode '.

  5 / in this section, you will see a box with the words "run this program in compatibility mode for" to the right.

  6 / click in the box to appear a "tick".

  7 / in the dialog box below, you should see "Windows XP (Service Pack 3)."

  8 / If you don't see it, click the arrow to the right of the box and select Windows XP (Service Pack 3) from the drop-down list.

  9 / Finally, click OK.

  10 / your Family Tree Maker software should now begin to install in compatibility mode for Windows XP.

  If this does not work (it usually works) then you may need to upgrade to a version of Family Tree maker that supports Windows Vista.

  This forum post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or the opinion of Microsoft, its employees or other MVPS.

  John Barnett MVP: Windows XP Expert associated with: Windows Desktop Experience: www.winuser.co.uk | vistasupport.mvps.org | xphelpandsupport.mvps.org | www.silversurfer-Guide.com

• Beta 12R3 - deployed app fails due to DataProvider is not not compatible with EF6

  Hello

  I developed an application with the ODAC 12 R3 beta and EF6 successfully. Everything works fine on my local machine. I deploy using ClickOnce. On the target machine, the installation works fine, but the application throws an exception saying that the data provider is not compatible with EF6.

  The assemblies Oracle.ManagedDataAccess and Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.EntityFramework are both set to copy local = True and specific Version = True.

  In the app.config file, I have the following:

  <? XML version = "1.0" encoding = "utf-8"? >

  < configuration >

  < configSections >

  < section name = "EF" type = "System.Data.Entity.Internal.ConfigFile.EntityFrameworkSection, Entity Framework, Version = 6.0.0.0, Culture = neutral, PublicKeyToken = b77a5c561934e089' requirePermission ="false"/ >"

  < / configSections >

  < Entity Framework >

  <>providers

  < invariantName = "Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.Client provider" type = "Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.EntityFramework.EFOracleProviderServices, Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.EntityFramework, Version = 6.121.1.0, Culture = neutral, PublicKeyToken = 89b483f429c47342" / > "

  < / providers >

  < / Entity Framework >

  < connectionStrings >

  "< name = 'name' connectionString =" "providerName =" Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.Client "/ >

  < / connectionStrings >

  < / configuration >

  It may be that there is an older version of the Oracle.ManagedDataAccess in the GAC on the target computer. Can this be a problem? And - if so - what can I do about it?

  Kind regards!

  Have you checked the deployed to the target computer config file? You must set the reference to system.data/DbProviderFactories - either in the machine.config file or the local configuration file.

  I use the following, as well in the app.config file in my library of data and the configuration of the finished application file:

  .. If you want to use tnsnames.ora, you can use instead:

  To get the version of the dll two s, also for other computers, install the last prerelease Nuget package ODP.Net - it contains Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.dll and Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.EntityFramework.dll, and if you install this Nuget package and refer to the included dll, any computer will be able to build the solution and create an installation package, as long as they get the Nuget package.

  Edit: The Nuget package I found contained the correct files, but did not write by Oracle, so I took off and I'm using other references - I'm looking forward to the official Nuget package...

  See also http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13721025/deploying-and-configuring-odp-net-to-work-without-installation-with-entity-frame

• MSSQL2012 Standard Edition SP1 is compatible with VC5.1U1a

  
  Dear team,

  In our environment, we have 5.1 U1a VC (1123961), I just want to confirm that MSSQL 2012 Standard edition (SP1) is compatible with this IS that we have installed in our environment.

  Also I would like to know how to check compatibility.

  concerning

  Mohammed Ahmed

  This does not mean that it will not work. However, if something goes wrong, our ESG can support not you since you are in an environment that is not supported. My advice is to always be in a supported configuration.

• You had better make it compatible with Kazpersky Firefox 6.0.2 or I EVER use Firefox again. You left my unprotected browser and that is not acceptable!

  You asked me to the latest update of Firefox. Yes, I did. then a box appears on the screen and says that the latest Firefox and my antivirus, Kazpersky protection, were not compatible. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!

  Your antivirus software from kaspersky, itself is not affected as the message was referring to the Extension he installed in Firefox.

  Internet Security 2012 is supposed to be compatible with Firefox 6.

  For example http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php?showtopic=215472

• 5.5 beta sdk will be compatible with the web client 5.1?

  Hello

  We are studying options for vsphere web clinet plugin. We use the 5.1 sdk for our plugin currently. Now we continue to hear a lot of new features coming with 5.5 Sdk. So we intend to spend 5.5 sdk, visitors will also migrate to version 5.5 web client to use our plugin?

  Concerning

  Built with the SDK 5.1 plugins must be compatible with the Web Client 5.5.  Our goal is to ensure backward compatibility for at least 1 major release.

• Windows 7 Professional is not compatible with the WPS ENABLED?

  Hi all:
  I have a desktop (HP Pro 3500 Series) with Windows 7 Professional and another laptop (HP COMPAQ CQ58) with Windows 8, 1 pro.
  My internet provider is Jasstel, and it worked perfectly in my two computers.
  I decided to activate the WPS of the router (comtred AR 5387un) and they started the problems. The laptop with Windows 8, 1 runs normally.
  The desktop with Windows 7 without work and it does not allow the connection to the Internet. The generated error is security configuration, it is incorrect.
  I erased the net so that I have again the password. You ask that I introduce the safety key from the net. I introduce the key (which she's right, because it works in another computer), and he told me that I should he Nail or the sentence of the password is not right and there is not the case.
  The only thing you change is the operating system. Windows 7 is not compatible with active WPS?
  I thank any help no I don't know what to do.

  A cordial greeting.

  Text of the Decree No. presidential East I translated it with a commercial translator. I am ignorant of the quality of the translation. Excuse me, otherwise it is all about what is good who do.

  Hello colambrero,

  This model is a class computer business and would be better asked in the forum of the Business Enterprise community.

  Here is the link to the appropriate section. http://h30499.www3.HP.com/T5/business-PCs-Compaq-Elite-Pro/BD-p/BSC-271

  I offer you my thoughts.

  I was wondering why you have decided to activate the WPS? It's easier to connect wifi devices but also creates security problems.  WPA2 with a good password is more reliable in my opinion.

  In addition, your Wifi adapter must be compatible WPS and I can't confirm if your model has one or not (I assume it does).

  Windows 7 that has Service Pack 1 installed? SP1 has a fix for problems with connections WPS for Windows 7.

  Personally, I would consider not not using WPS for security issues.

  Here is an article to example of Sophos Security explaining why not to use WPS.

  http://nakedsecurity.Sophos.com/2014/09/02/using-WPS-may-be-even-more-dangerous/

  It will be useful.

• 7 Verizon iPhone is compatible with LTE of Verizon's Straight Talk network?

  The answer to this question may seem like it's obviously - almost tautological - Yes, but according to three on three Straight Talk representatives (who claim to be supervisors) and one on a representative of Apple, he is not necessarily the case.

  They all said there is no way of knowing without the IMEI of the phone, if it is compatible with the network of Verizon LTE/CDMA of Straight Talk.

  I told them that I do not understand how an iPhone Verizon 7 maybe couldn't work on Verizon's CDMA/LTE network, if I try to activate it with a Straight Talk Verizon-network sim card. None of these representatives could give me a clear answer. They said quite simply the only way to check is to give them the IMEI number.

  I said that I don't have the IMEI number, because I didn't buy the phone again, and my whole point on appeal is to see if I need to buy this phone, because I can't risk to buy it, only to find out that it is not compatible. In other words, I feel like I'm stuck in a Catch 22.

  Why don't I just buy and return it, if it's not compatible? Because I intend to use my line of credit $ 1000 Paypal to buy electronic gift cards to target online and use the gift cards to buy the iPhone, because I don't have $1000 cash. So if I go back to the phone, I'll be stuck with a value of $ 1,000 worth of e-gift cards not returnable (that I don't need), a $ 1,000 balance on my line of credit of Paypal and no iPhone 7 - not a situation I want to find me.

  (I would buy the phone directly with my Paypal credit line, but target didn't allow customers to pay with Paypal in-store, and I have to pay for the iPhone in store since I pre ordered for in-store pickup. I would have paid for the phone target, Best Buy, or the site of Apple, but so far, the only way to do, is to sign up with one of the four major carriers [that I don't want to do], or already have an account with one of the big four carriers [which I did not]. Meanwhile, the 'sim-free' [i.e., not tied to any carrier] iPhone 7 is not yet available at Apple, or someone else, with no word on when it will become available.)

  Between me and my girlfriend, we have a 6 s iPhone and iPhone 5 c, that run on the network of Verizon CDMA/LTE of Straight Talk, so I can't imagine that the iPhone 7 would not. However, even Apple's site is not clear on this issue, as https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204039 shows that Straight Talk support LTE, http://www.apple.com/iphone/LTE/ shows that the Straight Talk support LTE on the iPhone 5 C / 5/6/6 s, but does not support LTE for the iPhone list 7.

  Straight Talk was told that even if the iPhone 7 does not end work with the Verizon CDMA/LTE of Straight Talk network, it should at least work with AT & T or T-Mobile network. However, AT & T and T-Mobile coverage *, where I live (as the Sprint of), so I really want to work with the Verizon network.

  Can anyone confirm that iPhone Verizon 7 will work with the network of Verizon CDMA/LTE of Straight Talk, or suggest how I can get around this tricky dilemma?

  I realized after posting the message above, it would have been better if I had written "CDMA iPhone 7" instead of "Verizon iPhone 7.

  It would have been clearer I wrote "of Straight Talk Verizon network' instead of 'network of Verizon's Straight Talk.

• My Yahoo Mail is "" forcing me to switch to Firefox by turning my functions in basic. Firefox is compatible with windows 7 for home and student?

  Hi, I have a Yahoo Mail account for many years. Now, they have turned my account in base saying that my IE9 is no longer supported and they are "" forcing me to download Firefox otherwise I have to continue with basic messaging. Firefox is compatible with windows 7 for home and studens? If I download firefox it will affect all the files I have on my computer? Will this affect my windows mail? Thanks for a quick reply.

  Fortuna2015 said

  Firefox is compatible with windows 7 for home and studens?

  As far as I know, Firefox runs on all variants of Windows 7. Firefox works better with a lot of memory, so if your system has 2 GB of memory, you may be limited in the number of windows and tabs you can open simultaneously before things get bogged down compared to a system that has 4 GB of memory.

  If I download firefox it will affect all the files I have on my computer? Will this affect my windows mail?

  As a web browser, you can configure Firefox to your default program to open web pages and links. If you do this, while some icons may change, for example, links to web pages can change to an icon of Firefox. In addition, Firefox has a built-in PDF reader, but you can still use Adobe Reader or another program to read PDF files if you want.

  Are you using Windows Live Mail or another standalone program to retrieve messages? Firefox be involved with it because these programs to get the mail directly, not not using your browser. But if you make Firefox your default for links Manager, when you click on a link in the e-mail software, it will open in Firefox instead of Internet Explorer.

  Other things:

  (1) attention to the download links at random in search engine results. You can get Firefox here (scroll to your preferred language):

  https://www.Mozilla.org/Firefox/all/

  (2) I'm sure after Firefox is started the first time, you will have many questions. The program should give you a little tour of routine, and you can use our support articles for more information: https://support.mozilla.org/products/firefox

  (3) you must install IE11 because there are still a few sites that use patented technologies and are not displayed in Firefox, such as Windows update

  http://www.Microsoft.com/en-us/download/Internet-Explorer-11-for-Windows-7-details.aspx

• Firefox is compatible with Panda Antivirus free, 2015?

  I would get a better FREE antivirus program. After reviewing the comments, I am interested in Panda Antivirus free, 2015, however they list the requirement to use Internet Explorer as your browser, & I don't want to lose my beloved Firefox. Firefox is really compatible with Panda or am I stuck with another anti-virus program? Thanks for your anticipated help.

  Hello

  Panda Antivirus must be compatible; on its download page it asks me a browser that I use and not inform me of any limitations.

  I'd be skeptical on an antivirus software download page if it says that it requires you to use only Internet Explorer to work. Make sure that you are accessing the correct web page and does not download from a third party site (where you can download anything other than a security suite, without your knowledge). The official link for Panda Security is

  • http://www.pandasecurity.com/USA/homeusers/downloads/

• Old favorites are not compatible with the version 20 + Firefox

  General information:
  I use the old client version 3.6 given that an old utility addon author stopped update and will not work with the new revisions. Despite disabling the update featured on: config and in preferences, the browser refreshes still finished (initially I was using 3.4 and would prefer to use that, but no matter how I try I can is no longer cancel 3.6 to 3.4 even if I reinstall using an Installer 3.4). Accordingly, I had the habit of keeping a copy of my directory of firefox where it updates again without asking, she has. This could help the guy out to meet countless people who have lost their favorites because of the upgrade released this year and I hope that someone to investigate and release a patch/utility to fix the problem.

  Question:
  I checked that the most recent customer since at least version 20 and leave, are not compatible with the old bookmark JSON files. Those who have been upgraded to the latest revision not only lose their favorites, but cannot restore them either, as Firefox only returns the error message: "unable to process the Backup File.

  I confirmed that the files themselves are perfectly intact with no sign of corruption and are as expected. Restore ok old revisions of browser (in my case specifically 3.6), they will not restore the most recent customer reviews. This isn't a fault with bookmark backups, but with new clients (I guess they changed the way they store information in the JSONs at some point. I note in the code for the JSONs GUID has never been used in old revisions, but it is in the most recent revision. Maybe it's causing an incompatibility problem? You just need to adjust the client so that it looks for the GUID and if none can be found to ignore it rather than decide that the file is corrupted.

  Old JSON Code snippet: {"title":"","id":1,"dateAdded":1306666129870000,"lastModified":1306670152435000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"placesRoot","children":[{"title":"Bookmarks Menu","id":2,"parent":1,"dateAdded":1306666129870000,"lastModified":1381254048121000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"bookmarksMenuFolder","children":[{"title":"Recently Bookmarked","id":6,"parent":2,"annos":[{"name":"Places/SmartBookmark","flags":0,"expires":4,"mimeType":null,"type":3,"value":"RecentlyBookmarked"}],"type":"text/x-moz-place","uri":"place:folder=BOOKMARKS_MENU&folder=UNFILED_BOOKMARKS&folder=TOOLBAR&sort=12&excludeQueries=1&excludeItemIfParentHasAnnotation=livemark%2FfeedURI& maxResults = 10 & queryType = 1 "}, {'index': 1,"title":"Recent Tags", 'id': 7, 'parent': 2,"annos": [{'name':" places/SmartBookmark', 'flags': 0, 'expires': 4, 'mimeType': null, 'type': 3, 'value': 'RecentTags'}], 'type': ' text/x-moz-place', 'uri' ":" place: sort = 14 & type = 6 & maxResults = 10 & queryType = 1 ""}, {'index': 2, 'title': id '',' ': 8, 'parent': 2, 'dateAdded': 1294868015246000, 'lastModified': 1294868015246000, 'type': "text/x-moz-place-separator"}

  New JSON Code Snippet: {"title":"","guid":"5rkFafJ6AnRZ","id":1,"index":0,"dateAdded":1396387525168000,"lastModified":1396387525168000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"placesRoot","children":[{"title":"Bookmarks Menu","guid":"m7vLM41-lzQi","id":2,"index":0,"parent":1,"dateAdded":1396387525168000,"lastModified":1396387526173000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"bookmarksMenuFolder","children":[{"title":"Recently Bookmarked","guid":"BEffyw6xva93","id":13,"index":0,"parent":2,"dateAdded":1396387526172000,"lastModified":1396387526172000,"annos":[{"name":"Places/SmartBookmark","flags":0,"expires":4 ,"value":"RecentlyBookmarked"}],"type":"text/x-moz-place","uri":"place:folder=BOOKMARKS_MENU&folder=UNFILED_BOOKMARKS&folder=TOOLBAR&queryType=1&sort=12&maxResults=10&excludeQueries=1"},{"title":"Recent Tags","guid":"WmnlbVv38Bjv","id":14,"index":1,"parent":2,"dateAdded":1396387526172000,"lastModified":1396387526172000,"annos":[{"name":"Places/SmartBookmark","flags":0,"expires":4,"value":"RecentTags"}],"type":"text/x-moz-place","uri":"place:type=6&sort=14&maxResults=10"}

  Solution?
  In my case, I had a copy backup of the old directory for review. To restore I opened the copy and export bookmarks as an HTML, that I restored in the most recent client. If you don't have a copy of the former client, the best thing would be to try and re-install an older revision of the customer and either make a copy of the program folder and use another copy of that you can use the new and old customers and you worry about the loss of an older revision, since you'll always have 2 copies of the former client (the one you use the one that you use to restore in the case of at level). Or export bookmarks to an HTML element, and then upgrade the client to the newest and import the HTML instead of JSON files.

  Please review and create a more simple solution to a problem of stupid incompatibility. ^_^

  There are a number of operations in the file places.sqlite which are obsolete.
  For example,.

  setItemGUID (aItemId, aGUID) obsolete since Gecko 14.0 - returns a unique global identifier for the element. This is mainly for use by extensions that synchronize data between different profiles bookmark.
  
  
  
  Former id snippit:
  "title": "','id': 1,"dateAdded": 1306666129870000,"
  New snippit
  {"title": "","guid": "5rkFafJ6AnRZ",""id ": 1, 'index': 0, 'dateAdded': 1396387525168000"}

  There are other identifier here has changed, I think in version 14
  «Note: the importHTMLFromFileToFolder() method has been removed in Gecko 14.0 (14.0 Firefox / Thunderbird 14.0 / SeaMonkey 2.11).»

  But more likely the former is Netscape format: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libra.../aa753582%28VS.85%29.aspx

  I tried this however: I installed the old version (3.5) and updated to the current version. All my favorites were there. I had to check the updates and could not skip certain steps of 3.5 to 3.6 for example. He then went from 3.6 to 12, then with todays update went straight to 30. They're all here. However nothing is perfect, backup is recommended as well.

  Back to your question, makes it easier for backward compatibility, my hypothesis is that they changed with the updates and ignored some versions. Saved profiles or places.sqlite files may be missing this change because the format changes in the update?

  My suggestion would be filing a bug at this request, providing a few cases where this would be necessary. Currently only the current version of Firefox is supported, which can leave us to the work around that you are currently using.

  Reference documentation for the developer of the places :

• The myfitnesspal website is most compatible with you? It will not connect, but works with all other browsers. I did help out. Did not work.

  Yesterday, I had problems with the Myfitnesspal.comwebsite. I have a tab set to open automatically when I start the browser every day. I could not connect any information in the site, so I tried a log off and log in. It doesn't let me log on to the site. I contacted, myfitnesspal and we worked through many steps in troubleshooting. I also tried all the steps of troubleshooting your site. I even made a full stop and start my computer. Nothing has solved this problem. I had the same problem with a couple of store that I like to go. The shop site work finally after more than six months of frustration. Myfitnesspal works on all other browsers. So with everything which has been tried and done, the problem seems to be your side somewhere. I'm running Windows 7 Professional 32 bit.

  I really hope that this could be solved because the site appears better on your browser. If you have any questions, feel free to send me an email.

  Thank you for what you can do about it, and for your time.

  Hello.

  I used to have this problem with Firefox only for some time. I was frustrated beyond. MyFitnessPal is 100% compatible with Firefox, however, some extension (type of) can cause significant headaches. I hope that this fix also helps.

  Do you by chance the https everywhere extension installed? It's a great add-on and I strongly recommend using it, however, unless you "disable" its use with MyFitnessPal, you will not be able to connect to your account, add food, weight update, see graphics, etc..

  So don't panic. Your question is likely to be what I had as well. I just went in the https everywhere extension and where it says "MyFitnessPal" with a checkmark (saying it is ACTIVE for the site), I simply clicked to disable the add-on for a site.

  Simple and it works instantly. I hope it does for you too! If you do not have this add-on so it is probably related to some thing similar so good luck to you!

  D

• Is a version of Firefox that is compatible with a Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 to come forth?

  The Firefox for Android that is currently available is not compatible with my Samsung Galaxy Tab 3. Is there a new version in the works that would be compatible?

  Update:

  The mobile Firefox 26.0 published on 10 December and is on Google game now takes supported mobile chipsets Intel x 86. You don't need to test beta versions more in order to use Firefox on Intel as Galaxy Tab 3 tablets.

  https://blog.Mozilla.org/futurereleases/2013/12/10/Firefox-for-Android-optimized-for-devices-that-support-Intel-x86-chipsets/