Relationship between AP refund on receipt of the AR

Hi all

In fact, I have an invoice number a refund, now I want to know the receipt number in a.r who has been associated with this invoice number.

There are tables for this scenario.

Thank you

Sudhir Reddy

This query will be more useful to you.

SELECT ara.application_ref_id, acra.receipt_number ar_receipt_number,

AIA.invoice_num ap_invoice_number, aia.invoice_amount

Of ar_receivable_applications_all ara,.

ap_invoices_all, aia,

Aida ar_cash_receipts_all

WHERE aia.invoice_id = ara.application_ref_id

AND acra.cash_receipt_id = ara.cash_receipt_id

AND aia.invoice_type_lookup_code = "REQUEST for PAYMENT"

Tags: Oracle Applications

Similar Questions

  • Relationship between a block of data and the latch

    Hello Experts,

    I just read an article on the full table scan and index by Richard Foote. http://richardfoote.WordPress.com/2009/04/16/indexes-on-small-tables-part-i-one-of-the-few/

    I thought that each block required only a single lock for each operation. However, I don't undersand that, why a single block required 2 locks? The qoute is the following,

    Note that Yes, indeed, he did 4 gets done and that none of the uniform becomes corresponded to the "cheapest" gets reviews. Therefore, the 4 in line gets used in the performance of the FTS of the required a single block table 4 x 2 = 8 snaps.

    Can someone explain the above quote it please?

    Thanks in advance.

    in most of the cases the latch fails while the buffer is pinned - it is only necessary get pin code, then again to remove (although for very quick access operations, there is also the "get consistent - review" that holds the lock while accessing the buffer). Randolf Geist explained the reason of the PIN and unpin in related things Oracle: e/s logic - evolution: part 1 - Reference:

    Why not simply Oracle retains all tampons pinned rather than go through the exercise of hash/latch/PIN again and again? Very probably for reasons of scalability / concurrency, for example:

    -A pinned buffer can not be deleted/replaced even if she was eligible according to the logic of the LRU, so potentially prevent other caching buffers

    -A pinned buffer is not accessible by other sessions that want to pin incompatible mode (exclusive vs. shared), although several sessions can pin simultaneously in compatible mode (shared). These two sessions are in the queue behind (that's what a "buffer busy wait" is on) or they may be able to create a clone of the block copy and to continue their work on copy of the clone.

  • Explain the relationship between libraries, albums and photos in pictures.  Where are the images stored?

    Looking for info on the relationship between libraries, albums and photos in the Photos app.  I can create several libraries containing photos and unique albums.  Can I put the same photo in libraries and the different albums?  By making a copy it creates a link to the original or a new photo?  Where are located the photo files?  When scanning photo to my Mac Pro files are placed in a folder structure, copy these photos in an album Photos using the original file or he places a copy in a database?

    Bottomline, I'm frustrated by the method of collection, the albums, the place and date.  I want store related photos in a separate album.   Example: A library for a family, containing albums of members of their family. Maybe the photos have duplicate in different albums.

    Some of your questions are answered by Leonie contributor in this thread:

    Re: Too many libraries...

    More answers can be found by using help in Photos app, or in general to help the Viewer.

    Apple Support website has links to information in articles; a search on the web is sometimes useful

    to locate the Apple pages faster than the company's site. Others in line include:

    Photos for OS X FAQ:

    http://www.IMore.com/photos-OS-x-FAQ

    How to use the Photos for OS x:

    http://www.IMore.com/how-use-photos-OS-x-ultimate-guide

    Good luck!

  • What is the relationship between the library of Photos and the iPhoto library?

    I'm asking this question here because I can't find all the relevant information online.

    I was dealing with imac a client recently who had a full boot drive. I noticed that his old iPhoto library used 126GB while she had already made the transition to the Photos. His photo library said that he was using a lot more (200 + if I remember correctly). I copied the iPhoto on an external drive library and deleted. Then, I opened the contents of the package and imported pictures remains in program pictures to make sure that I wasn't actually remove all of his memories. Once the work is finished, I was surprised to see that there are more than 6 GB of free space on his computer. What gives? Is there a relationship between the old iPhoto library and new photo library? If so, what is it? Is what I did without danger? I understand at the time that she will not be able to return to iPhoto. But what I'm missing?

    Thanks in advance for your comments.

    No - they are totally separate - connection or relationship of any kind is not

    or the other can be deleted without any effect on the other - but it won't save much space at all and is not recommended - which is exactly what you have seen- Photos saves disk space to share images with your iPhoto or Aperture - Apple Support libraries

    LN

  • Relationship between the samples through the second rate and sampling

    I was wondering if someone could clarify the relationship between the samples through second rate and sampling.

    I have USB6008 and USB6363 of the tips that I work with in Measurement Studio.

    For the nec USB6008 entry differential (up to four channels of HAVE), if I put a sampling frequency to 8192 samples per second, and I updated 2048 samples per channel with:

    Task.Timing.ConfigureSampleClock ("", 8192, SampleClockActiveEdge.Rising, SampleQuantityMode.ContinuousSamples, 2048)

    Am I right in assuming that:

    • through the 4 analog inputs 8192 samples will be collected every second
    • 2048 samples will be taken by way of analog input for each scan
    • The time between two successive data points is 1/2048 seconds (about 0.5 ms)

    Hi DKIMZEY,

    The help page for the "Timing.ConfigureSampleClock method" should have a hypertext link to the page "Sample clock" in NOR-DAQmx help, that contains this text: "this sample clock sets the interval of time between samples. Each tick of the clock starts the acquisition or the generation of one sample per channel. "When the sample clock frequency is 8192, then the time between two successive data for a single channel is 1/8192 seconds. The time between the data points on two adjacent channels is controlled by the clock to convert, which can be controlled independently on most devices (up to a point).

    Brad

  • I keep getting "the trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed" error windows 2008R2

    Hi all

    I appreciate your help. And I hope that this issue has been addressed previously, although I couldn't find any solution there.

    I manage a domain windows 2008 with 3 domain controllers. Recently my workstations continue to fall out of the field. I get "the trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed" to many workstations.

    I know how to fix properly, use netdom.exe. But the mistakes keep coming back. I don't know where to look for the source of this error. A possible problem might be the time in any field is out of sync. But all my workstations synchronize with the domain controller with the primary domain controller role and seems to work correctly.

    Are there other sources, that I need to check? This is getting frustrating.

    Thank you much for the help.

    Sincerely,

    Hello

    Post your question in the TechNet Server Forums, as your question kindly is beyond the scope of these Forums.

    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?category=WindowsServer

    See you soon.

  • What is the relationship between the source code (LKS) file and the process file (L4P)?

    I know that Lookout produces a file of source code with an LKS extension when you save a file to process.  Can someone explain the relationship between the two files, especially while the (L4P) process is running?

    1. Is this just a backup file can be recompiled in a process file?
    2. A file corrupt LKS cause strange problems with operation process file?

    I currently have a very strange intermittent behavior with a process file run.  I first thought that the problem was associated with my Fieldpoint and/or their configuration modules.  Since then, I found that my process file has a file corrupt LKS.  I repaired and recompiled my LKS file to a new file to process.  I still don't know if I have solved the problem or not.  So, the problem is intermittent, I did that about 20-30 SECONDS to resolve the problems there before he goes.  Then he can not show up again for another 2-3 days.

    The .lks file is just the source code of your process. It can be opened by a different version of lookout, but does not have the .l4p file.

    The .lks file is not be used while a process is running. Lookout does not read the file more after his execution. So it should not affect the running process.

    What kind of problem, is it?

  • the trust relationship between this machine and the primary domain failed

    Hi I have a virtual server (Server 03) with a vista machine, I can log on to the vista computer, but it happens with the trust relationship between this machine and primary domain failed. I tried to delete the domain vista machine, but he says you need to keep a main area

    Any suggestions gratefully received

    Hello

    Your question is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for Windows Server on Technet. Please post your question in the Technet forums. You can follow the link to your question:

  • How to fix Windows 7 32 Bit error: the trust relationship between the th workstation and primary domain failed

    How to fix Windows 7 32 Bit error: the trust relationship between the th workstation and primary domain failed

    Hi João,.

    To help solve the problem, remove the PC from the domain and then connect the computer to the domain.

    Click the Microsoft KB Article below for troubleshooting steps.

    The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed

    Let us know how it goes.

    Thank you

  • When you connect to Windows 7, get the error "the trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed."

    You open a session in Windows 7, you get an error stating "the trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed."
    Can someone help me please...

    AC of Phil wrote:
    > As you connect to Windows 7 you get an error saying "the trust relationship.
    ' > between this workstation and the primary domain failed.
    > Can someone help me please...

    Contact your domain administrator for the domain of the computer account
    recreated or reactivated, as appropriate.

    --

    Bruce Chambers

    Help us help you:
    http://www.CatB.org/~ESR/FAQs/smart-questions.html

    http://support.Microsoft.com/default.aspx/KB/555375

    They who can give up liberty for a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~ Benjamin Franklin

    A lot of people could die rather that thinking; in fact, most do. ~ Bertrand Russell

    The philosopher never killed the priests, while the priest was
    has killed a large number of philosophers.
    ~ Denis Diderot

  • Problem of password of account, without that we can connect to the network on this computer. The error indicates, "the trust relationship between this device and the network is no longer valid.

    Hi, I hope you can help with this problem. A friend has 6 computers networked to a Tower Server and have a problem. A worker student put computers into hibernation, and since then, nobody can connect to the network on this computer. The error indicates, "the trust relationship between this device and the network is no longer valid. I tried to get into the pc to try removing network and replace it, but I can't get on the Administrators account because it has been disabled. I'm at a loss on how to proceed. My friend cannot afford a service call, so I'll try to help him.  Thank you

    If the computer is on a domain then there are at least two accounts that can be used to remove the computer from the domain:

    • A domain administrator account.
    • A local administrator account.

    When your friend has launched Windows for the first time after buying the machine, he was prompted to enter the name of an account. This account is created automatically with administrator privileges. He should use it now.

  • The trust relationship between this workstation primary domain failed

    During log on, I am faced with an error "of the trust relationship between this workstation primary domain failed. If I disconnect the connection to the local network, then I lon on. What is the permanent solution easily?

    Hi Laurent,.

    This error message can occur if the computer is not connected to the same domain (or is connected to a working group) which is connected to the server computer (or the field on which is connected to the computer that is running Active Directory). Additional assistance can be provided the forum TechNet Service directory.

    "The relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed approval" error on a computer that is running Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2

    https://support.Microsoft.com/kb/2914474/en-us?WA=wsignin1.0

    You can post the question on the TechNet link below.

    https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?Forum=winserverDS

    Let us know if you need assistance on our part.

  • Relationship between the list and ListField...

    Hey people of Java...

    I can't thank you enough for your answers because I'm really starting to "grok" the paradigm of Java.

    Another came today I'm having problems understanding I deconstruct this app MemoryDemo...

    In the screen of the demo is these two lines:

    Get and display the list of customers.
    _customerList = CustomerList.getInstance ();
    _customerListField = new MyListField (_customerList.getNumCustomerRecords ());

    Well, now I understand the first line perfectly. She develops an object with the contents of the customers it contains.

    The second line calls a custom ListField routine that I show below:

    the final private class MyListField extends ListField
    {
    public MyListField (int numEntries)
    {
    Super (numEntries);
    }

    }

    Here is the part that I don't understand:

    It seems to appeal to both the MyListField() and the super() is simply the NUMBER of elements required, but not * that * list to use.  Exactly how is MyListField() or super() knows how to use the list of customers?  I ask because this exact routine is used a few lines more later (in the part of the main screen) to do the same thing for a list of the records of the order - even once without any reference to which list to use.

    It doesn't seem to be an explicit connection or the relationship between the _customerList and ListField is building.  Is somehow deconstruct '_customerList.getNumCustomerRecords ()' to its root and use _customerList somehow?  I don't think that I changed the call to this:

    _customerListField = new MyListField (_customerList.getNumCustomerRecords ());
    _customerListField = new MyListField (PICK_A_NUMBER);

    Where the constant is: public private static final int PICK_A_NUMBER = 50;

    And he ALWAYS displays a list of customers (though now with only 50 files).  How to do know?

    Thanks in advance!

    -John

    "I guess that somewhere in the interior architecture of the ListField, he knows that he has to paint the whole - one at a time - when put on the screen - that's it."

    Fix.

    This is the great thing about ListField.  It attracts only those who are on the screen.  If you use ListField draw a list of 10,000 rows (I tested), and it will only extract and draw the 10 that he needs.

    "Again, I don't find any explicit loop where it is through each element and then calling drawListRow()."

    Good yet once, it is not there.

    "Maybe one day I'll be able to pay it back here."

    It would be great.

  • The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed.

    The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed.  This only happens on the Windows 7 desktop.  It is sporadic.   Add the computer account to the domain is not a viable solution.  It happens far too often.

    There is nothing coherent we found on systems that are removed from the field.  Some time its workstations users, sometimes its laptops to students and sometimes he posts of laboratory work.  Different types of systems use different images.  All images are syspreped before creating the image.

    Hi Geoffrey,.

    Your question of Windows 7 is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question on the Technet Windows 7 Security Forum

    Lisa
    Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
    Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

  • I get an error, 'relationship between the workstation and the field has no confidence. "

    I have a 2003 domain controller, this a job gives me an error "trust in relationship between the workstation and the domain failed" so I read I have to reset the server, remove the object and remove the workstation from the domain, but my problem is that I can not even log in as administrator to do. My admin login details work perfect on other machines, but not this one. Help, please!

    On computers that are connected to a domain, you always have the choice to get authenticated by the controller of domain or the local computer. You must select the local computer, and then use a local administrator account.

Maybe you are looking for